Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (Full-HD-Video)
Price comparison
Average of 37 scores (from 60 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Chunky mainstream. Apart from the display size, the Huawei Mate 10 Lite does not have much in common with its namesake, the Mate 10 Pro. The Lite costs less than half as much as the Pro and is a very alluring mid-range smartphone. Our extensive review is going to reveal not only its strengths but also its flaws.
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIn the end, 'you get what you pay for' is true for smartphones in this day and age as a general rule. There are exceptions, but the Mate 10 Lite isn't one of them. Life with it won't be entirely niggle-free, but if your tolerance is pretty high it will make for a good companion.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Source: Phone Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe rest are annoyances rather than big issues: the outdated microUSB port used instead of the newer USB-C, the slightly clunky looks of the Emotion UI interface, the lack of the latest Android version and certainty about future updates, the just-okay battery life and the slow charging, and the lack of extras like water-proofing and wireless charging. If some of these sound a bit nit-picky for an affordable phone, it is because… well, the Mate 10 Lite is actually quite a good phone. Ultimately, it is a safe recommendation if you are looking for a well-rounded phone that does not break the bank.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe OnePlus 5T is still the midrange king, but Huawei’s Mate 10 Lite is a great choice if you can get it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Huawei Mate 10 Lite gets some good stuff from the Mate 10 in terms of screen, imaging experience and battery backup. A Mate in looks and a Lite in price sounds like the right balance and the output is well up to standard. Worth a try.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone World
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionHuawei Mate 10 Lite is one of the finest smartphones for the mid-range customers. From its display to camera section and its processor, it has worked amazing in every part. I didn’t get any major bad point for this device and if you are seeking a good smartphone under 30K then you must look at Huawei Mate 10 lite- won’t disappoint.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2017
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIn the time we spent with the Honor 9i/Mate 10 Lite, we did come to appreciate many things about it. The design is really quite impressive and makes the device stand out in its segment. The so-called FullView display is also quite nice and apart from the novelty is actually useful since it shows a lot more content. The software experience and general performance was also quite good.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: A1 Blog
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Android Mag
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 91%
Source: Area DVD
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2018
Source: Android Mag
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 91%
Source: Allround-PC.com
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2017
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Netzwelt
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 59% features: 50% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Stage
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Android Pit
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 83% mobility: 84%
Source: FAQsAndroid
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2018
Source: Computerhoy
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Guia
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Pplware
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/31/2018
Source: Ridble
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tecno Cino
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Source: Everyeye.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/20/2017
Source: Saggiamente
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/13/2017
Source: Androidiani
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2017
Source: HDblog.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 68% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto Android
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 78% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 87% ergonomy: 79%
Source: Portablegear
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/26/2018
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2017
Source: All About Phones
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2017
Source: Portablegear
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/15/2017
Source: Fredzone
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Frandroid
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tabletowo
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: 90 Sekund
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2018
Source: Android.com.pl
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2017
Source: Chip Online TR
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Log.com.tr
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Tek.no
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Dinside
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2017
Source: Alt om Data
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80%
Source: Input
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 95% performance: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Alt om Data
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Mobil DK
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobil.se
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro
 →zh-CN Archive.org version
 →zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/15/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 659: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
