判决
三星Galaxy XCover7 Pro 在许多方面都比 XCover7 好，但价格也更高。两款产品各有千秋，对于潜在买家来说都是不错的选择。
XCover7 Pro 支持 WiFi 6E，因此 WLAN-plus 的速度更快，性能更好，其广角摄像头使其在拍摄照片和视频时更加灵活。它配备了所有必要的保护机制，以应对艰巨的日常工作。
虽然 XCover7 Pro 的显示屏亮度不高，但它的面板不会出现 PWM 闪烁。
它的全新音响系统表现出色，而 7 年的软件更新也确实是一个有力的证明。
手机的可拆卸电池可能是大多数买家的决定因素之一。遗憾的是，它没有热插拔功能。
还有一点值得批评的是 XCover7 Pro 的存储配置：128 GB 的数据存储空间和 6 GB 的运行内存对于这个价位的手机来说有点过时了。
现在你可以选择了：廉价的 XCover7 还是功能更强大的 XCover7 Pro。如果你正在寻找一款经久耐用的手机，用于日常使用或商务用途，那么这两款手机都不会是错误的选择。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
截至发稿时，三星Galaxy XCover7 Pro 可在亚马逊等主要在线零售商处购买，目前售价为 599.99 美元。
规格
外壳 - 坚固的外壳内装有可拆卸电池
乍一看，XCover7 Pro 的正面几乎与三星 XCover7 Pro 完全相同。 三星Galaxy XCover7.另一方面，如果你看一下背面，就会发现 Pro 版还配备了第二个摄像头模块。
您无需使用任何工具就可以取下手机背面，从而可以接触到可拆卸电池。即便如此，它的外壳仍符合 IP68 防水防尘标准，这意味着它可以在浅水淡水中生存。
其尺寸变化不大，重量仍为 240 克。与 XCover7一样，它的显示屏由大猩猩玻璃 Victus+ 保护。
连接性 - 存储空间有限的Galaxy 手机
这款手机拥有 6GB 内存和 128GB 的大容量存储空间。考虑到它的价格，这有点微不足道：同价位的 ThinkPhone 25的数据存储空间是它的两倍。
好在三星看到了设备的 USB 端口：现在该机型的数据传输速率高达 5GBit/s，甚至还可以连接外接显示器。
microSD 读卡器
这款手机的读卡器可处理的 microSD 卡最大容量为 2 TB。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中，它的工作速度相当快，因此您可以毫不犹豫地使用这种存储扩展方式。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Cubot KingKong AX (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 58.9, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - 长期更新
该设备已安装Android 15，并可在三星 OneUI 7.0 上运行。在测试时，最新的安全补丁是从 2025 年 5 月开始的，所以仍然是最新的。制造商承诺提供 7 年的安全补丁和功能更新。
当然，三星Galaxy XCover7 Pro 还配备了一些人工智能功能，例如，你可以在图片上圈出日期，系统会自动据此创建约会。设备上的数据可以通过三星 Knox 进行保护，如果你是为企业购买，还可以轻松管理多部手机。
可持续性
得益于可拆卸电池、长期的软件更新和保护完好的外壳，XCover7 Pro 应该可以使用很长时间，这在可持续发展方面是值得欢迎的。
遗憾的是，我们无法找到Galaxy XCover7 Pro 使用寿命的二氧化碳具体数值。XCover7 Pro 的包装不使用任何塑料，采用大豆油墨印刷。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 可靠的定位服务
三星Galaxy XCover7 Pro 与 XCover7 Pro 相比也有了飞跃。 XCover7在通信模块方面也有了飞跃：它现在支持 WiFi 6E。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器测得的速度在 553 到 1,620 MBit/s 之间。这意味着我们的测试设备击败了许多其他户外手机。
手机可使用 nano SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡访问蜂窝网络，因此支持双 SIM 卡操作。提供大量 4G 和 5G 频段。
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Cubot KingKong AX | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
正如我们在实际测试中发现的那样，它的卫星定位能力同样出色。Galaxy XCover7 Pro 只在极少数情况下让我们稍稍偏离航线，例如在过桥时。在其他情况下，它的定位精度都很高，因此即使在紧急情况下，您也可以信赖手机的导航数据。
电话功能和通话质量 - 噪音抑制功能
在我们的测试中，手机听筒和内置麦克风的通话质量相当清晰，背景噪音也被很好地过滤掉了。
激活特殊模式可以获得更好的降噪效果，但通话者的声音清晰度可能会因此受到一定影响。
相机 - 包括广角镜头
XCover7 Pro 配备了超广角摄像头，让用户在日常生活中拍照时更加灵活。但遗憾的是，传感器的分辨率只有 800 万像素。虽然拍出的照片色彩丰富，但细节稍显不足。
我们用主摄像头拍摄的照片色彩还原度很高，但明亮区域往往曝光过度。在光线非常暗的情况下，清晰度尚可，但动态范围很低。
录制视频时，可以在两个镜头之间切换，但并不流畅。录制视频的帧频为 30fps，幸好还可以录制 4K。质量不错，自动对焦反应也很快。
1300 万像素摄像头负责自拍。自拍效果相当不错，只是暗部图像的动态范围还有待改进。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle camera
配件和保修 - 长达 3 年
除了智能手机本身，包装盒里只有一根 USB 数据线。
三星为普通版智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务，甚至为企业版智能手机提供 36 个月的保修服务。
输入设备和操作 - XCover 7 Pro（120 赫兹
该设备的显示屏刷新率高达 120 Hz，因此在某些情况下比 XCover7 上的 60 Hz 面板反应更灵敏。 XCover7.即使在湿手或戴手套的情况下操作，触摸屏通常也能准确响应。
XCover 按钮位于机壳左侧，可以相对自由地分配命令和应用程序。
XCover7 Pro 配备了指纹传感器。它集成在待机键中，解锁手机的速度相当快，而且非常可靠。面部识别也可用于解锁手机。
显示屏 - 户外手机，亮度一般
它的显示屏采用 PLS 面板，尺寸为 6.6 英寸，最大分辨率为 2,408 x 1,080 像素。
我们在测试中测得其亮度为 466 cd/m²，平均略低于其他户外手机的水平。另一方面，XCover7 Pro 在显示小图像摘录时，亮度刚刚达到制造商规定的 600 cd/m²。
在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行测试时，我们的测试设备出现了明显的蓝色偏光。不过，我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 495 cd/m²
Contrast: 853:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Oukitel WP200 Pro AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 p-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4" | Cubot KingKong AX IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 15% | 20% | 80% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 495 | 600 21% | 512 3% | 1125 127% | 553 12% |
| Brightness | 466 | 561 20% | 511 10% | 1109 138% | 521 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 98 14% | 97 13% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.58 | 0.57 2% | 0.5 14% | ||
| Contrast | 853 | 1053 23% | 1106 30% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.85 | 5.07 13% | 5.01 14% | 1.95 67% | 7.18 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.78 | 8.1 17% | 6.93 29% | 3.37 66% | 10.23 -5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7 | 5.7 19% | 3.5 50% | 2.4 66% | 7.1 -1% |
| Gamma | 2.231 99% | 2.249 98% | 2.241 98% | 2.099 105% | 2.291 96% |
| CCT | 8691 75% | 8162 80% | 7137 91% | 6336 103% | 8964 73% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). | ||
性能 - 相当强劲的动力
XCover7 Pro 配备了 高通骁龙 7s 第三代处理器这是一款功能强大的现代中端 SoC。这使得这款手机在我们的测试中表现优于许多其他户外手机。
在日常使用中，即使运行要求稍高的应用程序，它通常也足以流畅运行。不过，三星并没有因为安装了相对较慢的 UFS 2.1 存储系统而给自己带来任何好处。
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (8460 - 8857, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | Oukitel WP200 Pro | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | Cubot KingKong AX | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 87% | 267% | 174% | 144% | 22% | 294% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1043.4 | 488.2 -53% | 997.7 -4% | 975.43 -7% | 1000.7 -4% | 763 ? -27% | 2057 ? 97% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 232.6 | 501 115% | 936.4 303% | 856.48 268% | 915.2 293% | 297 ? 28% | 1671 ? 618% |
| Random Read 4KB | 194.4 | 212 9% | 368.5 90% | 287.4 48% | 230.6 19% | 153.3 ? -21% | 285 ? 47% |
| Random Write 4KB | 63.5 | 240.2 278% | 494.1 678% | 308.11 385% | 233.2 267% | 131 ? 106% | 327 ? 415% |
排放物 - 发热较高
温度
在我们的测试过程中，在长时间负载后，机箱温度有时会升至 50 °C以上，尽管只是局部的。这可能会令人不快，尤其是我们是在室温下测量这些数值的。
不过，在压力测试中，我们仅在多次运行基准测试后注意到轻微的性能损失。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Cubot KingKong AX | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
| Cubot KingKong AX | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
发言人
三星这款坚固耐用的手机配备了混合立体声扬声器。这意味着听筒支持设备底部边缘的全功能扬声器。只要不把音量调到最大，听起来就会很不错，因为这样会变得高音很重。
外部音频设备可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接。在我们的测试中，这两种方式都能正常工作，但事实证明，三星对其无线音频编解码器相当吝啬。
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 耐用且可更换
耗电量
Galaxy XCover7 Pro 的良好性能是以稍高的功耗值为代价的。
手机的最大充电功率为 15 瓦，充满一次电最长需要 2:30 小时。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  0.7 / 1.3 / 1.7 Watt |
| Load |
4.1 / 8.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 4350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 4050 mAh | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 4310 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 30% | 3% | -23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 1 -43% | 0.6 14% | 0.898 ? -28% | 0.872 ? -25% |
| Idle Average * | 1.3 | 1.2 8% | 0.8 38% | 1.383 ? -6% | 1.412 ? -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.7 | 1.3 24% | 1.1 35% | 1.498 ? 12% | 1.563 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 4.1 | 2.3 44% | 3.1 24% | 3.7 ? 10% | 7.02 ? -71% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.9 | 4.5 49% | 5.4 39% | 6.48 ? 27% | 10.5 ? -18% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
三星对手机的电池容量做了一些改进，现在提供容量高达 4,350 mAh 的可更换电池。
这为 XCover7 Pro 带来了良好的续航时间：在电池需要充电或更换之前，你可以上网 14:49 小时。
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 4350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 4050 mAh | Oukitel WP200 Pro 8800 mAh | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 4310 mAh | Cubot KingKong AX 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | 74% | 32% | 19% | |
| H.264 | 967 | 861 -11% | 1604 66% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 889 | 803 -10% | 1544 74% | 859 -3% | 1058 19% |
| Reader / Idle | 1405 | 1711 | |||
| Load | 284 | 204 |
Notebookcheck 总评分
XCover7 Pro 拥有充足的电量、许多方面的实用功能以及 7 年的更新，所有这些都让它成为一个不错的选择，尤其是对于公司和员工来说。
三星本可以给它更多的存储空间。
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
- 06/05/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
