Honor 魔力Vs智能手机评测。一款相对便宜且经久耐用的可折叠手机

Name: Honor Magic Vs
Brand: Honor

终于有三星的对手了？

只有少数可折叠智能手机能从中国飞跃到欧洲，但Honor Magic Vs将在几周后上市，其目的是以创新的铰链、大量存储和强大的电池赢得买家。它是否对头牌三星Galaxy Z Fold4构成威胁？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/20/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Foldable Smartphone

最重要的狗，即 Galaxy Z Fold4。在欧洲的可折叠市场上独占鳌头。它几乎没有面临任何竞争，因为大多数制造商只在远东市场推出其可折叠智能手机。但去年发生了一些事情。一些设备，如华为Mate Xs 2或微软的 Surface Duo 2也在欧洲试水。

尽管如此，对于那些羞于从中国进口而又想在欧洲购买可折叠手机的人来说，三星设备的替代品少之又少。Honor ，现在正寻求改变这种状况。去年，这家前华为子公司凭借其首款独立设备在西方国家声名鹊起。

但今年，时机已到。继任者，Honor Vs，已经在欧洲正式宣布，鉴于充足的存储和创新的铰链等有吸引力的特点，其价格具有竞争力，为1599欧元。让我们仔细看看Honor's advance against Korean top dog Samsung can achieve.

Test device courtesy of Honor Deuschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Magic Vs (Magic Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

12 GB

Display

7.90 inch 10:9, 2272 x 1984 pixel 382 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Cover display: 6.45-inch, 2560x1080, 21:9, 120Hz, OLED, HDR 10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 490 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.1 x 160.3 x 141.5

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 66 Watt Honor SuperCharge

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 54 MPix f/1.9, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @3840p/30fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/2.2, phase comparison-AF, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2); 8.0MP, f/2.4, phase comparison-AF, OIS, telephoto lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.5 (inner screen), 16 MPix, f/2.5 (outer screen)

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, back cover, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM support, fanless

Weight

261 g

Price

1050 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Honor Magic Vs SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	261 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.90"	2272x1984
89.8 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	263 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.60"	2176x1812
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	262 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8.02"	2160x1914
84.1 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Huawei Mate Xs 2 SD 888 4G, Adreno 660	255 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.80"	2480x2220
91.1 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	233 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80"	3080x1440

案例--创新材料

展开后，Honor Magic Vs是一个名副其实的迷你平板电脑，屏幕直径为7.9英寸，屏幕几乎是方形的。打开时的厚度为6.1毫米，比其竞争对手三星的产品略薄。即使在折叠时，它也不会太笨重，只有12.9毫米。

这款智能手机使用了现代材料，如外部显示屏的框架使用了镁合金，内部屏幕的框架使用了钛合金，这两种材料都是为了减轻重量。事实上，这似乎很有效，因为Honor Magic Vs的重量与大多数竞争对手一样，尽管它的电池明显更强。

背面由玻璃制成，有黑色和青蓝色两种颜色。它有一个高光泽的表面，因此相当容易受到指纹的影响。我们喜欢这个箱子的稳定性和做工；Honor Magic Vs看起来非常坚固，几乎不可能被扭曲。

重新设计的铰链据说有少得多的部件，使其不容易逐渐崩溃。铰链本身非常光滑。然而，屏幕中间因折叠而产生的折痕是清晰可见的，很明显。Honor 承诺40万次折叠循环的耐久性。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Huawei Mate Xs 2 Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Honor Magic Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G DIN A6 ❌

设备--为欧洲提供充足的内存

我们的测试设备配备了12GB的内存和512GB的大容量存储。据报道，这是唯一进入欧洲市场的变体，但在国际上也有8GB内存和256GB的较小存储选项。Honor ，在欧洲的出厂价是1599欧元，这使得Magic Vs对于可折叠手机来说价格合理。

USB端口传输数据的速度高达5Gbit/s，而其他高端智能手机目前也没有更快。当然，你可以用NFC来支付你的智能手机，还有一个红外线端口，如果需要，它可以作为电视的遥控器使用。

智能手机可以同时安装2张SIM卡，同时还可以安装eSIM。然而，缺少一个microSD读卡器，所以没有存储扩展的机会。

软件 -Android 13伪装

MagicOS 7.1是Honor'的用户界面的名称，它基于Android 13。任何以前拥有华为或Honor 智能手机的人都会发现这个软件很熟悉--尽管是分拆出来的，MagicOS仍然让人想起HarmonyOS。

Honor 魔术系统还预装了许多自己的应用程序，其中一些重复的功能已经被谷歌的应用程序所覆盖。因此，如果你想整理一下，你应该看看你想使用哪些应用程序，如果可能的话，删除对应的应用程序。

Honor 将为智能手机提供3年的新软件版本和5年的安全更新，也就是到2028年。在审查时，安全补丁是从2023年2月开始的，因此仍然是相当最新的。

通信和GNSS -Honor 智能手机上的快速WLAN

Honor Magic Vs支持WiFi 6E，这意味着它也可以利用稀少的6GHz网络，但我们的测试设备只能连接到华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器的5GHz频段。这并不影响传输速度，因为每个通道有160兆赫的带宽，在接收方向可以达到1.5GBit/s，在发送方向可以达到1.4GBit/s。数据速率也相对稳定。

Wi-Fi接收情况也令人满意：在靠近路由器的地方可以获得全部信号强度。在10米的距离和穿过3堵墙时，仍然是50%，可以看到页面加载速度有些慢。

在移动通信方面，5G和4G支持，以及广泛的频率范围，所以你可以在世界任何地方使用智能手机。在这里，我们也对该智能手机的信号质量进行了随机测试。Honor Vs是可靠的，并提供强大的天线功率，因此在大多数情况下，它可以跟上其他高端智能手机。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1496 (1387^min - 1627^max) MBit/s +14%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1315 (1162^min - 1385^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	882 (836^min - 927^max) MBit/s -33%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	808 (737^min - 839^max) MBit/s -39%
Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=182, last 2 years)	720 MBit/s -45%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	653 (585^min - 686^max) MBit/s -50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1671 (801^min - 1815^max) MBit/s +14%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1467 (1101^min - 1534^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	915 (858^min - 945^max) MBit/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	913 (455^min - 948^max) MBit/s -38%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	844 (415^min - 880^max) MBit/s -42%
Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1806, n=184, last 2 years)	730 MBit/s -50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1754 (1618^min - 1808^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (521 - 1945, n=81, last 2 years)	1430 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1504 (1343^min - 1604^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1864, n=81, last 2 years)	1372 MBit/s

Honor Magic Vs; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1315 (1162-1385)

Honor Magic Vs; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1467 (1101-1534)

Honor Magic Vs的定位系统支持所有主要的卫星系统，但缺乏用于更高精度的SBAS。在室内，我们的位置经常以高达5米的精度被定位。在户外，智能手机需要很短的时间才能达到3米的良好精度。

我们还带着Honor Magic Vs骑车，对智能手机的定位能力进行了实际测试。Garmin Venu 2智能手表作为我们的对比设备。

这款可折叠的智能手机在这里几乎没有显示任何弱点，提供了非常精确的跟踪数据。撇开最小的不完善之处，我们可以向那些对定位精度要求极高的人推荐这款智能手机。

电话和语音质量 - 罕见的掉线现象

Honor 安装自己的手机应用程序。这很好用，但如果需要的话，也可以很容易地用谷歌的标准应用或Play Store的另一个电话应用来代替。

听筒位于外部显示屏上方，但你也可以听到智能手机内的对话伙伴，这样你就可以把展开的智能手机放在耳边，进行通话。这里唯一需要注意的是，附近的其他人可以很清楚地听到对方在说什么。

我们的对话伙伴可以很好地理解，即使在最大音量下，声音也不会过大。最多，耳机在嘈杂的环境中偶尔会有点太安静。我们的声音也能通过麦克风清晰地传输，但在测试过程中，无论我们使用的是移动网络还是WLAN电话，都很少出现掉线现象。

通过扬声器也能很好地理解对方的意思，声音也能清晰地传输。然而，免提麦克风使我们的声音听起来有点尖锐，而且不能最佳地捕捉较柔和的声音。

摄像机 - 顶级设置

索尼的IMX800传感器有5400万像素，被用于主摄像头。两年前，它首次被安装在高端智能手机上，今天仍被用于高质量的中端手机，如Honor 70因此，正如我们的测试图像所显示的，拍摄吸引人的照片是肯定可能的。

颜色非常鲜艳，传感器对特写对象产生了很好的虚化效果，但与iPhone 14的照片相比，主要对象的细节明显丢失。 iPhone 14例如。

Honor Magic Vs在环境照片中显示出的锐度比，例如，Magic4 Pro，要低一些。 Honor 魔术4 Pro，但在其他方面能够保持成像性能。然而，与iPhone相比，锐度明显下降。

主摄像头能够在弱光和高对比度下拍摄出相当清晰的照片，但照片的暗部却没有那么好的亮度。

一个5000万像素的摄像头被用于广角和微距拍摄。不幸的是，它在边缘处以物体周围的彩色边缘的形式显示出色差。否则，我们喜欢广角照片，但它们也可以提供更多动态和细节。

一个3倍变焦相机也是设置的一部分，导致0.5倍至30倍的混合变焦。如果有必要，各个镜头拍摄的图像都会通过人工智能合并成一个，以便所有区域都尽可能的清晰。

8K视频可以用相机设置来记录，但最高为30帧/秒。在4K中，60帧也是可能的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - plant Main camera - environment Main camera - low light Wide angle camera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

1600万像素的前置摄像头的自拍效果相当不错，内屏和外屏上都有。然而，我们希望在放大的图像中获得更多的清晰度和亮度。

在实验室里，主摄像头在全光照下非常清晰；只有非常精细的结构没有那么清晰的呈现。颜色显示得很鲜艳。在只有1勒克斯的照明条件下，图像仍然很容易辨认，但边缘变得稍微不干净，在深色前面的黑色文字缺乏对比。

ColorChecker Honor Magic Vs: 11.66 ∆E min: 3.13 - max: 25.27 ∆E

配件和保修 - 免费提供快速充电器

Honor Magic Vs配有一个66瓦的充电器，包括一条USB线，一个SIM卡工具，以及一个智能手机背面的保护罩，可以用可重复使用的胶膜贴在铰链一侧。

相应的电源适配器可以在Honor "在线商店 "购买，价格为30欧元。花30欧元购买。

制造商在欧盟地区为该设备提供24个月的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同，所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

输入设备和操作 - 精确的生物识别技术

内侧的大触摸屏的最大刷新率为90赫兹，而外侧的显示屏则能达到120赫兹。然而，我们没有注意到这里的反应能力有任何真正的差别：在两个屏幕上滚动都非常流畅。

可折叠手机对小手来说有点难用，Honor Magic Vs也很难例外。遗憾的是，单手模式在显示屏展开时无法使用。内屏中间的折痕清晰可见，在操作过程中有时会很烦人。

指纹扫描仪位于机箱右边缘的待机按钮中。当屏幕打开时，最好用右手的拇指登记，它通常放在这个位置上。扫描仪能非常可靠地识别我们的手指，并毫不拖延地解锁设备。

面部识别也是可能的，在日常生活中工作没有问题。然而，与之不同的是Honor Magic4 Pro。没有额外的硬件，所以这种方法并不十分安全。

▶ load Youtube video

显示器 - 明亮的显示器，有轻微的颜色偏差

Honor Magic Vs配备了两个OLED屏幕。在外面，有一个细长的21：9格式的显示屏。这是电影格式的理想选择，但在传统的16:9视频中，右侧和左侧可以看到相当宽的黑色条纹。该分辨率对应于FullHD。

120赫兹的显示屏使用起来非常流畅。Honor ，选择了一个相当冷的颜色表现前工作，但你可以从预定义的设置中选择，或在色轮中手动改变白平衡。外部显示器的图像质量是生动和锐利的。

真正的明星当然是可折叠显示屏，它几乎是10:9的正方形。这对于16:9的视频来说并不理想，因为这些视频不能比传统手机显示屏上的屏幕更大。但它非常适合处理文本或并排运行两个应用程序。

内屏的亮度不高，只提供90赫兹的帧率，但只有专业的游戏玩家才可能看到外屏响应速度的真正差异。我们希望在黑暗环境下，最低水平的发光度更少。

1) Honor Magic Vs outer display (X-Rite i1Pro 2) 2) Honor Magic Vs inner display (X-Rite i1Pro 2)


1154 cd/m²	1192 cd/m²	1121 cd/m²
1188 cd/m²	1207 cd/m²	1226 cd/m²
1177 cd/m²	1197 cd/m²	1203 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with Honor Magic Vs outer display (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Maximum: 1226 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1185 cd/m² Minimum: 11.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1207 cd/m²
Contrast: 219:1 (Black: 5.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27


804 cd/m²	808 cd/m²	821 cd/m²
795 cd/m²	803 cd/m²	816 cd/m²
799 cd/m²	812 cd/m²	822 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with Honor Magic Vs inner display (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Maximum: 822 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 808.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 803 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

	Honor Magic Vs OLED, 2272x1984, 7.9"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"	Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 OLED, 2160x1914, 8"	Huawei Mate Xs 2 OLED, 2480x2220, 7.8"	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"
Screen		26%	27%	-7%	26%
Brightness middle	803	913 14%	1015 26%	763 -5%	1117 39%
Brightness	809	929 15%	1022 26%	769 -5%	1133 40%
Brightness Distribution	97	96 -1%	98 1%	95 -2%	97 0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.27	1.7 25%	1.6 30%	2.8 -23%	2.2 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.99	3.6 40%	3.4 43%	5.9 2%	3.9 35%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.9	1.5 62%	2.6 33%	4.3 -10%	2.3 41%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.16 ^102%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	6234 ^104%	6515 ^100%	6506 ^100%	6457 ^101%	6572 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在我们用分光光度计和CalMan软件进行的测量中，使用了色彩配置文件 "正常 "和暖白平衡。然而，一些色调不能准确显示，特别是两个面板上的棕色和浅蓝色。

Honor 承诺直流调光的频率超过1,500赫兹，所以敏感的用户应该不会在屏幕上遇到任何问题。示波器也只向我们展示了屏幕的刷新率。响应时间对于快速动作游戏来说是足够的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

这两块显示屏在处理明亮的日子时都没有困难，而且内部显示屏的反射率也不像传统显示屏那么高，这是在强光下的另一个优势。

由于采用了OLED技术，可视角度毫无异议。因此，两个人可以轻松地从不同角度观看屏幕。

性能--Snapdragon不能完全释放其力量

的高通骁龙8+ Gen1是去年的一款高端SoC。与此同时，已经有了一个继任者，它被用于三星Galaxy S23 Ultra。比如说。

在Honor Magic Vs中，它在我们的基准测试中无法完全发挥其威力。这可能是由于未完全成熟的软件和未优化的驱动程序，但具有相同SoC的其他设备在某些情况下提供明显更多的性能。

另一方面，这种差异在日常使用中几乎不明显，因为Honor 手机也非常快，对大多数应用来说足够强大。只有在要求非常高的应用或几个复杂的应用分屏时，这款手机才会出汗。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1556 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1334 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1324 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=25)	1281 Points +43%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	1107 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2437, n=160, last 2 years)	1094 Points +22%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	897 Points
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	5082 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4237 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=25)	4167 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4065 Points +7%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3782 Points
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 8816, n=160, last 2 years)	3693 Points -2%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	3334 Points -12%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1226224 Points +57%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1057225 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=23)	997431 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	973843 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=74, last 2 years)	817893 Points +5%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	782013 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	15991 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 20841, n=24)	15090 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13983 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)	13982 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13195 Points +17%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	11296 Points
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	11230 Points -1%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1226 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1178 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=23)	1033 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)	990 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	975 Points +7%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	911 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	9091 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7858 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=23)	7450 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7003 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)	6801 Points +21%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	5722 Points +1%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5642 Points
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	14275 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12839 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=23)	11726 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	11275 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)	10640 Points +22%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	10078 Points +15%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8750 Points
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	9075 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7782 Points +101%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)	7516 Points +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=23)	7492 Points +94%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7342 Points +90%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	7081 Points +83%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3871 Points
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	28497 Points +23%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	23174 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16194 - 26660, n=23)	21146 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	19418 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	19283 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	18021 Points -22%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	15539 Points -33%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1982 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1850 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=23)	1699 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1612 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)	1612 Points +25%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1291 Points
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192	967 Points -25%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	84787 Points +897%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	73962 Points +770%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=21)	43831 Points +416%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)	18171 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	16511 Points +94%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8502 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (887 - 147801, n=11)	37778 Points +3674%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)	27735 Points +2671%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1312 Points +31%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1201 Points +20%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1001 Points

ǞǞǞ Adreno 730也是一个非常强大的图形单元，可以轻松处理最复杂的游戏和图形应用。在图形计算方面，Honor Magic Vs的速度也很快，与同类设备相当。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3791 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2766 Points +1%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2735 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2726 Points 0%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1449 Points -47%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3829 Points +37%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2799 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2795 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2778 Points -1%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1494 Points -47%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14369 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11098 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11022 Points +1%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10893 Points
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5666 Points -48%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7433 Points
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5717 Points -23%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	492 fps +17%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	419 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	381 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	298 fps -29%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	262 fps -37%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +97%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps +85%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -18%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	261 fps +10%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	238 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	211 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	179 fps -25%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps -69%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps +32%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +23%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -68%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	190 fps +30%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	146 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	145 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -21%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -48%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65 fps +18%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -22%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps -69%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps +31%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps -18%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +33%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -29%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -56%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +63%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -5%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -34%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps +42%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -14%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	157 fps +31%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -25%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -40%

在网上冲浪方面，Honor Magic Vs的性能值在基准测试中相当复杂。

不过，在日常使用中，网站的加载速度非常快，除了偶尔的小停顿外，可以相当流畅地滚动浏览。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	159.102 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)	152.211 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)	137.7 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)	125.2 Points +12%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	111.449 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)	76.341 Points -32%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	169 runs/min +70%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	143 runs/min +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)	119.6 runs/min +20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)	116 runs/min +17%
Honor Magic Vs (Chome 111)	99.4 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)	145 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)	131 Points +62%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)	128.2 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21)	113.9 Points +41%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	81 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2	Points -100%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)	174 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=68, last 2 years)	160.9 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)	159.4 Points +30%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	123 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	59214 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)	52642 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)	43074 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)	42193 Points +15%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	36606 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)	29168 Points -20%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 (Huawei Browser 12.1)	26010 Points -29%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)	1530.8 ms * -45%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)	1364 ms * -29%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	1055.4 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)	1023 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)	799.9 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	685 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Honor Magic Vs通过UFS 3.1存储提供相对较短的加载时间和快速数据传输。

然而，在2023年，新的UFS 4.0闪存将是最先进的。该三星Galaxy S23 Ultra例如，它证明了数据块的移动速度可以快得多。

	Honor Magic Vs	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G	Xiaomi Mix Fold 2	Huawei Mate Xs 2	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra	Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		4%	31%	-10%	32%	7%	16%
Sequential Read 256KB	1695.2	1854.98 9%	1882.11 11%	1850.72 9%	3426.56 102%	1852 ?(1023 - 2023, n=29) 9%	2054 ?(270 - 4384, n=186, last 2 years) 21%
Sequential Write 256KB	1296.5	1251.57 -3%	1783.27 38%	739.83 -43%	1389.84 7%	1227 ?(575 - 1876, n=29) -5%	1667 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=186, last 2 years) 29%
Random Read 4KB	270.2	321.87 19%	342.67 27%	260.49 -4%	449.77 66%	286 ?(208 - 386, n=29) 6%	286 ?(47.6 - 504, n=186, last 2 years) 6%
Random Write 4KB	300.1	265.9 -11%	446.48 49%	301.38 0%	152.92 -49%	348 ?(221 - 533, n=29) 16%	327 ?(9.4 - 964, n=186, last 2 years) 9%

游戏--可折叠智能手机上的稳定帧率

在大屏幕上进行游戏是相当不错的，尽管屏幕的几乎正方形格式自然地限制了对左右两边的概述，这在射击游戏中可能是个问题。在这里，外部屏幕可能更适合。

从性能上看，没有理由抱怨。PUBG移动 版在UltraHD中的运行速度接近40帧，《暗黑破坏神：不朽 》持续在60帧。帧率是用我们的GameBench工具测量的。

还提供了一个游戏覆盖，显示系统负载并提供一些可选的设置，尽管这些设置最多只能对性能产生最小影响。尽管如此，它提供了一些有用的快速设置，如防止通知或截图工具。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器的控制功能完美无缺。

Honor Magic Vs; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.5.0: Ø58.7 (54-60)

Honor Magic Vs; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.5.0: Ø39.2 (37-41)

Honor Magic Vs; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 1.7.5: Ø59.7 (59-60)

Honor Magic Vs; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 1.7.5: Ø59.6 (58-60)

排放 - 负载下有相当大的热量

温度

在长时间的负载下，智能手机会变得相当热，特别是在摄像头模块周围的区域。在这里，我们测得室温下的最高温度为46.9℃。在炎热的环境中，这可能是更大的问题。

这种强烈的废热在长时间负载后的性能值中可以感觉到。我们在3DMark Wild Life的20次运行后测得了近70%，因此牺牲了很大一部分性能。

Max. Load

Idle


46.9 °C	45.4 °C	37.7 °C
37.6 °C	36.1 °C	34.6 °C
30.2 °C	32.2 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 36.7 °C


35.3 °C	38 °C	40.2 °C
35.1 °C	38.8 °C	43.5 °C
28.1 °C	28.9 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 35.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	70.3 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 % -2%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55.9 % -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.6 % -24%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95.2 % +37%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.3 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.7 % -16%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.1 % -17%

Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.1 (11.6-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12 (10.4-16.6)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (15.9-16.7)

Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø6.91 (5.45-9.37)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23)

Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.5 (44.4-63.1)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø42.2 (33.4-62.3)

Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø24.1 (19.8-35.5)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (53.6-77.7)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)

发言人

Honor Magic Vs在外壳的顶部和底部都有一个带有外部显示屏的扬声器。如果你正确持有智能手机，这使得立体声效果成为可能。然而，由于扬声器的宽度很小，它们几乎听不到。

此外，扬声器的功率不大：即使在最大音量下，也只能达到75.3分贝（A）。例如，三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的声音明显更大，超过90 dB(A)。

在最大设置下，声音有些偏重于高音。声音听起来非常清晰，但有点过度强调，特别是在唱歌的时候。如果你降低音量，声音会变得更加紧凑，声音与背景音乐融合得更好。

有许多编解码器可用于无线声音传输，即BLE、SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD。外部音频设备的连接，无论是通过USB-C还是蓝牙，都没有问题。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Magic Vs audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--持续时间长......对于一个可折叠的智能手机来说

消耗功率

当然，像Honor Magic Vs这样大的屏幕需要更多的能量，但与其他可折叠智能手机相比，Honor 智能手机的能耗相当高。操作时最多需要10.1瓦，最低负荷时至少需要1.3瓦。

你可以用最大的66瓦特给智能手机充电，包装中包括一个相应的充电器。充满电需要一个多小时，但你在充电几分钟后就能恢复几个百分点的电池寿命。无线充电是不可能的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.3 / 1.7 / 2 Watt
Load	7 / 10.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor Magic Vs 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G 4400 mAh	Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		38%	29%	36%	10%	13%
Idle Minimum *	1.3	0.89 32%	0.97 25%	0.9 31%	1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21) 23%	0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=159, last 2 years) 33%
Idle Average *	1.7	0.96 44%	1.37 19%	1.05 38%	1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21) -8%	1.415 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=159, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	2	1.13 43%	1.48 26%	1.1 45%	1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21) 1%	1.556 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=159, last 2 years) 22%
Load Average *	7	4.32 38%	3.98 43%	3.99 43%	5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21) 19%	7.04 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=150, last 2 years) -1%
Load Maximum *	10.1	6.56 35%	6.83 32%	7.82 23%	8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21) 16%	10.6 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=150, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Magic Vs; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.18 (1.782-11.5)

Honor Magic Vs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.794 (1.553-2.18)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Magic Vs; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.98 (7.02-10.8)

Honor Magic Vs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.794 (1.553-2.18)

电池寿命

尽管电源要求很高，但在我们的电池测试中，Honor Magic Vs被证明是相当耐用的，至少对于一个可折叠的智能手机来说是如此。 12.在我们的WLAN测试中，36小时告诉我们，你有可能度过一个工作日。强大的5,000毫安时电池在这里肯定发挥了作用。

总体而言，运行时间适合日常使用。但对于那些主要追求耐力的人来说，Magic Vs和大多数可折叠手机一样，很难成为经典智能手机的替代品。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		23h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 31min

	Honor Magic Vs 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G 4400 mAh	Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 4500 mAh	Huawei Mate Xs 2 4600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-25%	-40%	46%
Reader / Idle	1435	1276 -11%			2139 49%
H.264	1089	1153 6%			1543 42%
WiFi v1.3	756	663 -12%	567 -25%	454 -40%	1100 46%
Load	271	238 -12%			400 48%

Pros

+ 稳定的铰链

+ 别致和高质量的外壳

+ 明亮的屏幕

+ 可靠的直流调光

+ 适合日常使用的运行时间

+ 在游戏中表现良好

+ 价格合理

+ 快速充电

+ 良好的存储配置

+ 长时间的更新承诺

+ 快速的WLAN

+ 准确定位

Cons

- 平庸的扬声器

- SoC不那么强大

- 显示屏上有明显的折痕

- 没有无线充电

- 强大的加热功能

- 没有IP认证

- 广角拍摄中的色差问题

结论 - 好的翻盖手机，价格合理

Honor Magic Vs的售价为1,599.00欧元，对于可折叠手机来说，价格相对低廉，并提供顶级功能，然而，这些功能不能完全跟上今年的高端智能手机。例如，没有WiFi 7，没有超快的UFS 4.0存储，相机虽然不错，但没有最好的传感器。

可折叠性方面仍然令人着迷：在你的口袋里有一个折叠的7.9英寸平板电脑是一件好事。然而，方形屏幕更有利于处理多个应用程序或文本；与传统智能手机相比，宽屏格式的电影，显示屏并没有赋予任何尺寸优势。

屏幕之间的折痕是清晰可见的，也是有形的，但Honor Magic Vs的外壳仍然令人印象深刻。据制造商称，平稳运行的铰链是为了持久。高科技材料的使用推低了重量，并为一个非常强大的电池腾出了空间。然而，考虑到巨大的屏幕，你必须在电池寿命方面做出某些妥协。

CPU性能并不完全令人信服，广角摄像头在物体周围显示出彩色边缘，防尘和防水功能在可折叠智能手机中仍然是缺乏的。另一方面，Honor 承诺提供长时间的软件支持，定位能力令人信服，充电也非常快。

Honor Magic Vs是一款价格适中的可折叠智能手机，具有良好的运行时间。它令人着迷，但无法解决其产品类别的所有问题。

同时三星Galaxy Z Fold4的价格已经下降了很多，所以在amazon.de上可以找到它，价格刚刚超过1300欧元。顺便说一句，三星的可折叠智能手机也支持手写笔。此外，还有华为Mate Xs 2，价格略高于1,300欧元。

注：我们收到了一个生产型的评论，但它带有不完整或未完全优化的软件。因此，性能值或相机显示可能在最终模型中得到改善。

价格和可用性

在审查时，Honor Vs尚未在中国以外的全球市场上市，但据制造商称，它将在第二季度推出。

Honor Honor Magic Vs的售价为1599欧元，使其在上市时比 Z Fold4少200欧元。Galaxy

Honor Magic Vs - 03/18/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 93%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 76%

Weight

87%

Battery

90%

Display

90%

Games Performance

70 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

81 / 86 → 94%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

65 / 90 → 72%

Camera

77%

Average

81%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1646 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 534395 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor 魔力Vs智能手机评测。一款相对便宜且经久耐用的可折叠手机

Florian Schmitt, 2023-03-20 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Honor 魔力Vs智能手机评测。一款相对便宜且经久耐用的可折叠手机

终于有三星的对手了？

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例--创新材料

尺寸比较

设备--为欧洲提供充足的内存

软件 -Android 13伪装

通信和GNSS -Honor 智能手机上的快速WLAN

电话和语音质量 - 罕见的掉线现象

摄像机 - 顶级设置

配件和保修 - 免费提供快速充电器

输入设备和操作 - 精确的生物识别技术

显示器 - 明亮的显示器，有轻微的颜色偏差

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能--Snapdragon不能完全释放其力量

游戏--可折叠智能手机上的稳定帧率

排放 - 负载下有相当大的热量

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Honor Magic Vs audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

电池寿命--持续时间长......对于一个可折叠的智能手机来说

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 好的翻盖手机，价格合理

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison