Notebookcheck Logo

谷歌 Pixel Fold 评测：可折叠智能手机，拍照效果不错

怕光。 关于谷歌推出可折叠智能手机的传言已流传多年，现在它终于来了。这款手机的规格令人期待，但由于缺乏创新，其价格并不具有竞争力。在我们的评测中，您将了解谷歌首款可折叠手机的表现如何。
Android ARM Foldable Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

继Pixel 7 &Pixel 7 Pro 、Pixel 7a 打入高端市场、Pixel 7a 打入中端市场之后，这家美国巨头又首次涉足可折叠智能手机领域，推出了 Pixel Fold。

从外观上看，Pixel Fold 与目前的 Pixel 7 家族的隶属关系不容忽视，但与三星、华为和Honor 不同的是，Pixel Fold 在外形设计上尤其不同，它更容易让人联想到 Oppo Find N2。

就在上市之前，谷歌还针对平板电脑和可折叠设备进一步优化了Android ，从而使自家产品受益匪浅。我们来仔细看看 Pixel Fold。

Google Pixel Fold
Processor
Google Tensor G2 8 x 1.8 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex X1 / A76 / A55, Titan M2 Security Chipset
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
7.60 inch 6:5, 2208 x 1840 pixel 378 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, Cover display: 5.8 inches, 2092x1080, OLED 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 241 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, UWB
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 42, 46, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79), 5G mmWave (Band 257, 258, 260, 261), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.05 x 158.7 x 139.7
Battery
4821 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, 25 mm, 1/2", 0.8 µm, OIS) + 10.8 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/3.1, 112 mm, 1.22 µm) + 10.8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 1/3", 1.25 µm); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 9.5 MPix (f/2.2, 1.12 µm, 84°, Fixfocus) + 8 MPix (Inside, f/2.0, 1.12 µm, 84 °, Fixfocus)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-C cable, OTG adapter, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a), QZSS, NavIC; DRM Widevine L1, Body-SAR: 1.39 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg, IPX8, fanless, waterproof
Weight
283 g
Price
1899 Euro
Links
Google homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.7 %
08/2023
Google Pixel Fold
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		283 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1840
89.1 %
08/2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		253 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2176x1812
86.3 %
06/2023
Huawei Mate X3
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.85"2496x2224
87.2 %
03/2023
Honor Magic Vs
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		261 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.90"2272x1984
86.3 %
12/2022
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		262 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.02"2160x1914

在对比领域，Google Pixel Fold 的厚度与Galaxy Z Fold5或 Honor Magic Vs展开时厚度为 6.05 毫米；带摄像头时厚度增加了 2.5 毫米。折叠时厚度为 12.1 或 13.6 毫米。它的重量也相当重，为 283 克。

而外形和做工则令人信服。尤其是前者，它是欧洲市场上的一个独特卖点。Pixel Fold 的缝隙齐平，配合完美，但在轻微的扭转压力下会发出吱吱嘎嘎的声响。显示屏与表面的比例为 83%，还可以做得更好。IPX8 认证证明谷歌可折叠手机具有防水功能，这是一个积极的方面。

不锈钢铰链给人非常坚固和高质量的印象，可折叠显示屏也显得很稳定，但其接缝非常明显。这也是由于 Pixel Fold 无法以 180 度角完全打开，而是停在 178 度左右。

这款智能手机有黑曜石 和瓷两种颜色。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
161.6 mm 144.7 mm 5.4 mm 262 g160.3 mm 141.5 mm 6.1 mm 261 g158.7 mm 139.7 mm 6.05 mm 283 g156.9 mm 141.5 mm 5.3 mm 239 g154.9 mm 129.9 mm 6.1 mm 253 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - Pixel Fold 配备 USB 3.2 和 UWB

谷歌 Pixel Fold 采用快速 USB 3.2 端口（第 2 代），不支持图像输出。不足为奇的是，该设备没有音频插孔，也不能通过 microSD 扩展内存。

作为回报，谷歌提供了两种存储版本：较小的 256 GB 机型，也是我们的测试设备，售价 1799 美元；512 GB 版本，售价 1919 美元。后者也只有黑色。

配备了 NFC、蓝牙 5.2 和 UWB。

顶部（打开）：扬声器、毫米波天线、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部（打开）：扬声器、毫米波天线、麦克风
左（打开）（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左侧（打开）
右（打开）：电源/指纹、音量摇杆（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
右侧（打开）：电源/指纹、音量摇杆
底部（展开）：麦克风、USB、扬声器、麦克风、SIM 卡（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部（展开）：麦克风、USB、扬声器、麦克风、SIM 卡
顶部（闭合）：毫米波天线、麦克风、扬声器（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部（闭合）：毫米波天线、麦克风、扬声器
左（闭合）：铰链（照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
左（关闭）：铰链
右（闭合）：电源/指纹、音量摇杆（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
右侧（闭合）：电源/指纹、音量摇杆
底部（闭合）：麦克风、USB、扬声器、SIM 卡、麦克风（照片：Daniel Schmidt）
底部（闭合）：麦克风、USB、扬声器、SIM 卡、麦克风

软件 -Android 可折叠设备的优化应用程序

谷歌 Pixel Fold 预装了Android 13，并计划在至少五年内接受安全更新和三次重大升级，即升级至Android 16。

现在，应用程序和系统已针对大尺寸显示屏进行了更好的优化。在设置中，你可以在左侧滚动菜单，而相应的内容则显示在右侧。天气预报 或Gmail 等一些应用程序也进行了相应的优化。还可以并排运行两个应用程序，并通过拖放在它们之间移动内容。虽然这并不适用于很多应用程序，但今后数量会越来越多。

Pixel Fold 的安全补丁在我们评测期间（8 月份）已经更新，因此非常及时。

外部显示屏
外部显示屏
主显示屏：主屏幕
电子邮件
天气应用程序
设置
两个应用程序并行运行
分组应用程序在任务管理器中保持连接

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 5G 毫米波，但没有 Wi-Fi 7

谷歌 Pixel Fold 支持所有现代手机标准，频率范围堪称典范。这款智能手机甚至支持毫米波 5G。虽然这在欧洲还不能使用，但它绝对是一款面向未来的智能手机。我们在城市中进行测试时，信号强度非常好，无可挑剔。

Pixel Fold 支持 IEEE 802.11 标准，即 a/b/g/n/ac/ax（Wi-Fi 6E），可在 2.4、5.0 和 6.0 GHz 频段工作。这与我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合得天衣无缝，因为传输速率和传输功率都非常稳定。

Networking
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
950 (min: 481) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1714 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1684 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
886 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
924 (min: 456) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1631 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1601 (min: 1511) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
928 (min: 851) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
934 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼64%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1315 (min: 1162) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1467 (min: 1101) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
808 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼62%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
687 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
708 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1456 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1344 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1686 (856-1766)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1075-1812)
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1447-1788)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1511-1667)
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (888-932)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø884 (764-954)
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (481-980)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (456-950)

在室内，Pixel Fold 可以快速准确地定位。Foldable 支持双频模式下的所有全球卫星网络。

在一次短途自行车骑行中，谷歌智能手机要与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一较高下。路线清楚地显示，Pixel 查询位置的频率较低，因此 Fold 的覆盖距离也相应较长。特别是在房屋之间，它显示出与实际路线的明显偏差。但在导航任务方面，预计不会有太大的限制。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试骑行：环路
全球导航卫星系统测试骑行：环路
全球导航卫星系统试乘：总结
全球导航卫星系统试乘：总结

电话和语音质量

谷歌 Pixel Fold 拥有一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽，可以使用 eSIM 卡，也可以实现双 SIM 卡操作。用户可以为每个存储的电话号码单独分配一张 SIM 卡，还可以在每次通话前选择使用哪个号码。但不能为额外的 SIM 卡选择单独的铃声。同样，智能手机也不能自动切换数据连接。双卡用户还不能在双模式下安装信使应用程序。支持 VoLTE 和 WiFi 通话等基本功能。

Pixel Fold 的语音质量在贴近耳朵时非常好，能可靠地过滤掉大部分背景噪音。在扬声器模式下，可折叠手机的音质也很好，回声很小。

摄像头--谷歌像素折叠屏的三摄像头性能良好

Pixel Fold 有两个前置摄像头。一个集成在正面显示屏中，另一个集成在可折叠面板的边框中。两个摄像头都有固定焦距。不过，外侧的摄像头可以录制高达 60 FPS 的超高清视频，而内侧的摄像头只能录制 30 FPS 的全高清视频。自拍效果相当不错，尤其是盖板显示屏的光学效果。在人像模式下产生的虚化效果令人愉悦，但对拍摄对象的过渡有点粗糙。使用主摄像头可以获得更好的自拍效果，主摄像头的前面板可用作取景器。

后置摄像头的主传感器像素为 4800 万像素，采用像素分档技术，可生成 1200 万像素的图像。照片具有均衡的色彩平衡和良好的白平衡。在日光下，照片的清晰度令人满意；只有背景的虚化看起来有点结块，可以再柔和一些。尽管如此，用户仍然可以根据自己的意愿进行调整。当光线不足时，自动模式会迅速切换到夜景模式，使拍摄对象更加明亮，但也会忽略一些细节。

超广角的画质一般。动态范围和景深都不错，但很多细节都丢失了，显得还原不干净。潜望镜变焦提供 5 倍光学放大和最大 20 倍数字放大。只要光线充足，效果还是令人满意的。所有镜头都不提供专门的微距模式。

使用所有三个镜头都能以最高 60 帧/秒的超高清速度录制视频。如果将帧频降低到 30 FPS，还可以录制色彩深度为 10 位的 HDR 视频。

主摄像头还可用于自拍。
主摄像头还可用于自拍。
与内置相机自拍
与内置相机自拍
使用外置摄像头自拍（肖像模式）
使用外置摄像头自拍（肖像模式）

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light

谷歌 Pixel Fold 在可控光照条件下拍摄测试图的表现非常出色。许多细节都保留了下来，即使是外围区域也不例外。

色彩表现也令人信服，没有发现任何明显的异常值（DeltaE > 10）。

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel Fold: 4.55 ∆E min: 0.65 - max: 9.96 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
16 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel Fold: 24.17 ∆E min: 12.18 - max: 36.84 ∆E

附件和保修 - 折叠件不含电源适配器

谷歌 Pixel Fold 的供货范围相当小：一条 USB-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡针和一个 OTG 适配器。仅此而已。电源适配器不包括在内，但可以选择从谷歌购买。此外，还可以使用第三方电源适配器。

谷歌还提供两种可选的保护套。一个由透明塑料制成，另一个有三种颜色可供选择。不能购买特殊保险。德国的保修期为 24 个月，其他地区可能有所不同。因此，建议买家在购买前仔细检查

输入设备和操作 - 仅使用前置摄像头进行面部识别

两款电容式触摸屏都具有非常好的滑动特性，能快速准确地执行输入。遗憾的是，这两块屏幕都不支持笔。可折叠面板的接缝也非常明显，无论是视觉效果还是触觉效果都是如此。

在生物识别安全方面，电源按钮上有一个指纹传感器，也可用于启动谷歌助手。这提供了良好的识别率，并能快速解锁可折叠智能手机。面部识别也可用于外部显示屏上的摄像头。

显示屏 - 时尚明亮的 OLED 显示屏，像素折叠频率高达 120 赫兹

亚像素矩阵（可折叠显示屏）
亚像素矩阵（可折叠显示屏）
子像素矩阵（外部显示）
子像素矩阵（外部显示）

在外观上，谷歌采用了 5.8 英寸 OLED 显示屏，分辨率为 2092x1080 像素，刷新率高达 120 Hz。较小的盖板显示屏亮度比可折叠显示屏高得多，在激活环境光传感器的纯白显示屏上，图像中心亮度可达 1225 cd/m²。主显示屏的峰值亮度为 1,559 cd/m²，亮区和暗区分布均匀（APL18）。如果手动调节亮度，最高亮度可达 597 cd/m²。
。

内部主显示屏尺寸为 7.6 英寸，宽高比为 6:5，分辨率为 2,208 x 1,840，运行频率高达 120 Hz。亮度较低，在启动环境光传感器时平均亮度为 997 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量中，亮度上升到 1318 cd/m²，在手动模式下达到 608 cd/m²。两款显示器均支持 HDR 标准 HLG、HDR10 和 HDR10+。
。

不过，在测量亮度时，我们注意到环境光线传感器周围的区域在受到大量光线照射时会迅速过热，系统会将面板严重调暗。在这种情况下，我们测得的亮度仅为 465 cd/m²。在炎热的天气里，这肯定会成为一个问题。

Pixel Fold 的显示屏也会出现典型的 OLED 闪烁，而且效果相同。我们用示波器测得的频率相当稳定，为 120 赫兹。虽然频率不是很高，但由于调制水平很低，振幅曲线也很均匀，应该很少有人会抱怨。不过，也不能排除特别敏感的人可能会出现这种情况。

1) X-Rite i1Pro 3 - Cover Screen 2) X-Rite i1Pro 3 - Foldable Screen
1235
cd/m²		1231
cd/m²		1220
cd/m²
1227
cd/m²		1225
cd/m²		1212
cd/m²
1227
cd/m²		1228
cd/m²		1213
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3 - Cover Screen
Maximum: 1235 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1224.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1225 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
1017
cd/m²		1004
cd/m²		998
cd/m²
1019
cd/m²		993
cd/m²		979
cd/m²
1017
cd/m²		985
cd/m²		961
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3 - Foldable Screen
Maximum: 1019 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 997 cd/m² Minimum: 1.76 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 993 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Google Pixel Fold
OLED, 2208x1840, 7.6"		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"		Huawei Mate X3
OLED, 2496x2224, 7.9"		Honor Magic Vs
OLED, 2272x1984, 7.9"		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
OLED, 2160x1914, 8"
Screen
-28%
5%
-45%
-6%
Brightness middle
993
1104
11%
948
-5%
803
-19%
1015
2%
Brightness
997
1107
11%
969
-3%
809
-19%
1022
3%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
94
0%
97
3%
98
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
3.1
-121%
1.4
-0%
2.27
-62%
1.6
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.2
4.2
-31%
2.6
19%
5.99
-87%
3.4
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
3
-43%
1.7
19%
3.9
-86%
2.6
-24%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.01 109%
2.15 102%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
6796 96%
6594 99%
6539 99%
6234 104%
6506 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小化显示
分钟
25 % 显示功能
25 %
50 % 显示功能
50 %
75 % 显示功能
75 %
最大程度的手动显示功能
100 %

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

在使用卡尔曼分析软件测试显示屏的色彩和显示精度时，我们使用自然色彩配置文件取得了最佳效果。外部显示屏甚至比可折叠屏幕更精确：其数值非常好，肉眼无法看到偏差。

如果使用默认设置，显示效果会明显变冷，但也可以使用更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间。

灰度（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（外部显示器，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（可折叠显示屏，色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7815 ms rise
↘ 0.808 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 3.187 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

在户外，Google Pixel Fold 的表现非常出色，在阴天也能始终保持可读性。由于面板会明显变暗，内容的可读性可能并不总是最佳，尤其是在温暖和阳光充足的日子里。

阴天的室外
阴天的室外

我们喜欢 Pixel Fold 可折叠 OLED 显示屏的视角稳定性。在平视角度下，亮度会略有下降，但不会造成困扰。显示屏的温度也会随之降低。

谷歌 Pixel 折叠屏（主显示屏）的视角稳定性
谷歌 Pixel 折叠屏（主显示屏）的视角稳定性

性能 - 配备 12GB 内存的张量 G2

与谷歌当前的其他智能手机一样，Pixel Fold 采用了谷歌张量 G2和 12GB LPDDR5 内存。

虽然 SoC 定位在高端，但它无法赶上骁龙 8+ Gen 1的差距。与目前的 骁龙 8 代 2的差距也相应拉大。

不过，在系统基准测试中，我们可以明显看到，Pixel Fold 也落后于采用相同 SoC 的同类产品。这一方面是因为 Pixel Fold 需要处理的像素更多，另一方面也是因为 SoC 的散热效果较差，我们将在温度 部分详细讨论。

Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1999 Points +35%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1806 Points +22%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1480 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1428 - 1480, n=4)
1452 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=143, last 2 years)
1361 Points -8%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5384 Points +52%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4656 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=143, last 2 years)
3798 Points +8%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (3383 - 3967, n=4)
3638 Points +3%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3533 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1135554 Points +83%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057225 Points +71%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
985150 Points +59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=117, last 2 years)
783427 Points +26%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
782013 Points +26%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (619727 - 773857, n=5)
692109 Points +12%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
619727 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16311 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13195 Points +14%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12606 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=193, last 2 years)
12453 Points +7%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11617 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11296 Points -3%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (10530 - 11736, n=5)
11184 Points -4%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1253 Points +40%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1117 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
975 Points +9%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
911 Points +2%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (886 - 934, n=5)
900 Points +1%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
895 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1474, n=153, last 2 years)
850 Points -5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9337 Points +64%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7236 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7003 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11438, n=153, last 2 years)
6068 Points +6%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (5704 - 6419, n=5)
6057 Points +6%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5704 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5642 Points -1%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14032 Points +69%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12326 Points +48%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11275 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=153, last 2 years)
9958 Points +20%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (7803 - 9601, n=5)
8791 Points +6%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8750 Points +5%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
8318 Points
Memory
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8846 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8467 Points +86%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7342 Points +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=153, last 2 years)
6551 Points +44%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (4556 - 6548, n=5)
5416 Points +19%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
4556 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3871 Points -15%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31928 Points +97%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
23174 Points +43%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20974 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18021 Points +11%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16243 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (15766 - 16375, n=5)
16151 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=153, last 2 years)
15841 Points -2%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2032 Points +18%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1720 - 1838, n=5)
1750 Points +2%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1720 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1612 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (747 - 2145, n=153, last 2 years)
1537 Points -11%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1291 Points -25%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1198 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
73962 Points +96%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (37656 - 44323, n=5)
42050 Points +12%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
37656 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 78964, n=146, last 2 years)
17406 Points -54%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8502 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1267 Points -97%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 245629, n=129, last 2 years)
18451 Points +3620%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1201 Points +142%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1001 Points +102%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (496 - 1008, n=5)
840 Points +69%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
496 Points

图形加速由ARM Mali-G710 MP7处理。它能提供很高的性能，但显然要逊色于目前高通公司的 Adrenos。由于主显示屏的分辨率较高，屏幕速率也低于 Pixel 7 Pro 等产品，这意味着帧速率降低了约 30%。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3892 Points +127%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2757 Points +61%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2735 Points +60%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2726 Points +59%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1711 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3901 Points +122%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2821 Points +60%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2799 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2795 Points +59%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1760 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14599 Points +113%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11041 Points +61%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11022 Points +61%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10893 Points +59%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6849 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7433 Points +18%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6278 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6030 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5983 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5847 Points +18%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4973 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24283 Points +130%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20549 Points +94%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20220 Points +91%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10577 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14482 Points +71%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13386 Points +58%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13077 Points +55%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8459 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -26%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
434 fps +43%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps +38%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
329 fps +9%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps +12%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +9%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
238 fps +164%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
222 fps +147%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps +134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps +82%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps +29%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps +27%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +9%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
146 fps +85%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
145 fps +84%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +41%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +61%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +30%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps +24%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +110%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +92%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps +63%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +132%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps +61%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +14%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +11%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +103%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +72%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps +41%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +34%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps +120%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +69%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +46%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +46%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
138 fps +116%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps +95%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +88%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps +66%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +121%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +64%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps +36%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps +29%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps

在网上冲浪方面，Google Pixel Fold 表现出色，在基准测试中也取得了不错的成绩。同样实用的是，访问的网站可以直接以桌面版显示在大显示屏上。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
188.652 Points +77%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
111.449 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=159, last 2 years)
111.4 Points +5%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
106.562 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (96.3 - 117.8, n=5)
104.7 Points -2%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
103.364 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
76.341 Points -28%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
127 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=147, last 2 years)
119.3 runs/min -6%
Average Google Tensor G2 (100 - 134, n=5)
118 runs/min -7%
Honor Magic Vs (Chome 111)
99.4 runs/min -22%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
185 Points +83%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=150, last 2 years)
105.9 Points +5%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
101 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (90 - 111, n=5)
98.6 Points -2%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
97 Points -4%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
81 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Points -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
60317 Points +38%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
50732 Points +16%
Average Google Tensor G2 (43817 - 47939, n=5)
45221 Points +3%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
43817 Points
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
36606 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years)
34402 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
29168 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1676 ms * -56%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
1530.8 ms * -42%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
1074.5 ms *
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
1055.4 ms * +2%
Average Google Tensor G2 (920 - 1075, n=5)
992 ms * +8%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
880.8 ms * +18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
693.3 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

谷歌 Pixel Fold 仍在使用 UFS 3.1 存储系统，而不是更先进的 UFS 4.0，原因很简单，因为它还不被 Tensor G2 支持。张量 G2.虽然对比领域的智能手机使用的是较早的标准，但它们的速度都更快。与 Galaxy Z Fold5或 Magic V2的差距要大得多，因为它们使用的是 UFS 4.0。

Google Pixel FoldHuawei Mate X3Honor Magic VsXiaomi Mix Fold 2Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
41%
17%
53%
20%
18%
16%
Sequential Read 256KB
1606.37
1953.41
22%
1695.2
6%
1882.11
17%
1854.98
15%
1756 ?(1004 - 2037, n=94)
9%
1715 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
7%
Sequential Write 256KB
1169.32
1479.42
27%
1296.5
11%
1783.27
53%
1251.57
7%
1152 ?(452 - 1873, n=94)
-1%
1327 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=197, last 2 years)
13%
Random Read 4KB
219.11
261.78
19%
270.2
23%
342.67
56%
321.87
47%
285 ?(173.5 - 543, n=94)
30%
265 ?(22.2 - 543, n=197, last 2 years)
21%
Random Write 4KB
238.72
466.74
96%
300.1
26%
446.48
87%
265.9
11%
316 ?(132.1 - 499, n=95)
32%
291 ?(9.4 - 709, n=197, last 2 years)
22%

游戏 - 像素折叠延迟和卡顿

普通的休闲游戏对 Google Pixel Fold 来说不成问题，但在大显示屏上玩图形要求较高的游戏时，情况就会发生变化，我们使用GameBench 对其进行了仔细的测试。.

在 PUGB Mobile 中，由于采用了大尺寸面板，游戏体验确实不错。即使在最高细节级别，高清设置也能以几乎恒定的 40 FPS 非常流畅地运行。不过，要求非常高的《源氏冲击》的粉丝们会感到失望，因为游戏偶尔会出现卡顿，即使在最低细节级别也是如此。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Google Pixel Fold; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 3.8.0_15672274_15939604: Ø44.7 (20-61)
Google Pixel Fold; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 3.8.0_15672274_15939604: Ø29.9 (18-50)
Google Pixel Fold; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø57 (47-61)
Google Pixel Fold; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.7.0: Ø39.6 (31-41)

废气排放 - 谷歌折叠机冷却能力较弱

温度

不出所料，谷歌 Pixel Fold 在最大显示亮度下空闲时的表面温度较低。而在游戏过程中，折叠屏的右侧也会明显发热，最高温度可达 44 °C。

我们使用 3DMark 压力测试来检查 SoC 在负载情况下的发热情况。与其他 Pixel 智能手机相比，Pixel Fold 的性能最多下降了 50%，速度也更慢。作为对比 Magic Vs在负载情况下性能也会下降约 30%，但在冷启动时仍比 Pixel Fold 快。

Max. Load
 30.7 °C40.9 °C46.5 °C 
 30.6 °C39.2 °C43.9 °C 
 30.7 °C41.7 °C44 °C 
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
44.8 °C42.2 °C30.5 °C
43 °C41.5 °C30.6 °C
37.6 °C39.6 °C29.8 °C
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70.3 % +39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.9 % +19%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50.4 %
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40.7 % -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % +61%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.6 % +18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % +14%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 %
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.9 % -26%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.7 (6.38-10.8)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.93 (8.31-11)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø17.2 (15.6-23.3)
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø26 (20-39.6)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (26.2-38.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.3 (50.1-83.6)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø36.5 (30.7-39.8)

发言人

谷歌 Pixel Fold 的两个扬声器能发出动人的声音，中高音均衡。只有低音略显单薄。激活空间音频后，也只能稍稍改变这种情况。

耳机必须通过 USB-C 接口连接，可能需要一个适配器。蓝牙音频编解码器中缺少 aptX TWS+ 和 aptX Adaptive，除此之外，产品组合非常完整，还包括 LC3 和 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.933.22522.330.33123.223.54025.423.25031.136.46320298017.82510017.528.812517.341.11601550.320015.147.925016.355.631513.561.940013.959.550013.466.563013.370.280011.773.910001470.312501469.9160013.369.220001368.7250013.569.1315014.373400013.473.4500014.770.4630013.667.9800014.170.1100001468.71250014.264.91600013.858.7SPL25.882.5N0.756median 14median 68.7Delta0.76.230.937.222.325.323.225.625.42731.137.82026.317.82217.531.217.340.41555.215.154.816.358.113.556.713.956.113.463.813.365.311.769.61471.91475.413.377.21379.613.577.414.378.513.479.414.778.413.674.914.171.91467.314.26413.85725.888.40.771.1median 14median 69.60.710.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel Fold audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 支持无线充电和 PD3

耗电量

作为一款可折叠手机，谷歌 Pixel Fold 的耗电量并不明显，而且相当节俭。

充电速度在很大程度上取决于所使用的电源，因此可能需要很长时间。由于谷歌智能手机也支持 PowerDelivery 3.0（PD 3.0），我们使用合适的电源适配器进行了尝试，充电速度确实很快：充满电需要 92 分钟。14 分钟后电池电量为 25%，31 分钟后为 50%，56 分钟后为 80%，69 分钟后为 90%。

Pixel Fold 还支持无线充电，但不能为其他设备无线供电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.07 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.7 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 9.1 / 11.06 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
4400 mAh		Huawei Mate X3
4800 mAh		Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh		Average Google Tensor G2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
25%
-62%
-6%
24%
-1%
14%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.55
36%
0.81
6%
1.3
-51%
0.97
-13%
0.896 ?(0.62 - 1.33, n=5)
-4%
0.91 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=147, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Average *
1.7
0.9
47%
4.26
-151%
1.7
-0%
1.37
19%
1.984 ?(0.87 - 4.67, n=5)
-17%
1.441 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=147, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
1
44%
4.45
-147%
2
-11%
1.48
18%
2.07 ?(0.95 - 4.78, n=5)
-15%
1.607 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=147, last 2 years)
11%
Load Average *
9.1
9.58
-5%
10.11
-11%
7
23%
3.98
56%
6.32 ?(3.27 - 9.81, n=5)
31%
6.22 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=146, last 2 years)
32%
Load Maximum *
11.06
10.74
3%
11.58
-5%
10.1
9%
6.83
38%
10.8 ?(5.5 - 19.8, n=5)
2%
9.17 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=146, last 2 years)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.6 (0.943-5.71)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (1.023-13.7)
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.013 (0.939-1.303)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.12 (3.67-8.19)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.01-13.1)
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.013 (0.939-1.303)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)

电池寿命

在我们的测试中，谷歌 Pixel Fold 的电池续航时间相当不错。在激活平滑显示功能并将大屏幕显示器亮度调整为 150 cd/m²的情况下，连续浏览网页的续航时间将近 11 个小时，这与Galaxy Z Fold4只有 Magic Vs的续航时间明显更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 22min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 115)
10h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 17min
Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh		Huawei Mate X3
4800 mAh		Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
4400 mAh
Battery Runtime
-27%
6%
-13%
-1%
Reader / Idle
1582
1435
-9%
1276
-19%
H.264
960
1089
13%
1153
20%
WiFi v1.3
651
476
-27%
756
16%
567
-13%
663
2%
Load
257
271
5%
238
-7%

Pros

+ 出色的外形设计
+ 精确的 OLED 显示屏
+ 更新时间长
+ 防水
+ UWB 和无线充电

Cons

- 环境光线传感器的过热问题
- SoC 在负载情况下严重节流
- 无 WIFI 7
- 显示屏折缝明显
- 沉重

评语--谷歌的首次亮相表现不俗

回顾：谷歌 Pixel Fold。测试设备由谷歌德国公司提供。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
回顾：谷歌 Pixel Fold。测试设备由谷歌德国公司提供。

谷歌 Pixel 折叠手机之所以能在竞争中脱颖而出，尤其是因为它的外形设计。这款可折叠智能手机也不算太厚，而且可以完全平齐闭合，但由于其显示屏与表面的比例一般，因此丢了几分。

谷歌智能手机在性能方面也没有赢得任何奖杯。在正常系统运行时偶尔会出现卡顿，但在游戏中则更为常见，即使是去年的竞争设备在配置上也要好得多。

谷歌成功地打造了 Pixel Fold 这款强大的首款可折叠手机，但仔细观察还是会发现一两个弱点。

好的摄像头是一个优点，Pixel Fold 的电池续航时间也很稳定。环境光传感器的问题比较严重--如果我们把它暴露在强光下，它就会发热并使显示屏变暗。这对某些用户来说可能是个问题，尤其是在夏天。

在价格方面，谷歌可折叠手机与 Galaxy Z Fold5.那些不太看重外形的用户可能会觉得 Fold4是一个令人兴奋的选择，因为它的价格已经大幅下降。同样便宜得多的还有 Honor Magic Vs.

价格和供应情况

在美国，Pixel Fold 黑曜石色在百思买有售，售价 1799 美元。

价格截至 2023 年 8 月 13 日，可能会有变动。

Google Pixel Fold - 08/11/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
57 / 70 → 82%
Weight
87%
Battery
89%
Display
83%
Games Performance
50 / 64 → 78%
Application Performance
83 / 86 → 96%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
78%
Average
80%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Google Pixel Fold (Pixel Fold Series)

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 谷歌 Pixel Fold 评测：可折叠智能手机，拍照效果不错
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-08-14 (Update: 2024-08-15)