三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测：有些怪诞的高质量智能手机

Name: Samsung Galaxy S20
Brand: Samsung

紧凑的Galaxy。 三星的Galaxy S20是最著名的智能手机系列之一的最新更新。紧凑的尺寸和强大的性能是肯定的，但是最新的Galaxy智能手机还应该具有改进的摄像头和更长的续航时间。在我们的全面评测中了解三星是否成功实现了这一目标。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/01/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S20 (Galaxy S20 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G77 MP11

Memory

8 GB

, DDR5

Display

6.20 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 566 PPI, 10点触控, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB Type-C电缆, Card Reader: 高达1 TB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，陀螺仪，接近传感器，指南针，气压计

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900); UMTS (1, 2, 4, 5, 8); LTE (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 151.7 x 69.1

Battery

4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix f / 2.0，相位检测AF，OIS，视频@ 4320p / 24fps（相机1）; 12 MP，f / 1.8，相位检测自动对焦（双像素），OIS，LED闪光灯（2号相机）; 12.0MP，f / 2.2，广角镜头（3号相机）
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix f / 2.2，相位检测自动对焦（双像素），视频@ 2160p / 30fps

Additional features

Speakers: 混合立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, S-Pen，SIM工具，S-Pen使用指南，USB Type-C耳机，适配器, 24 Months Warranty, 下载-LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA 2 Gbps；上传-Cat.20 3CA 316 Mbps。 SAR值：身体– 1.523 W / kg，头部– 0.209 W / kg。 ANT +; IP68认证。无风扇，防水重量：机身：163克；充电器：49克, fanless, waterproof

Weight

163 g, Power Supply: 49 g

Price

899 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.7 %	06/2020	Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	163 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.20"	3200x1440
86.5 %	10/2019	Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	194 g	64 GB SSD	6.10"	1792x828
87.4 %	04/2019	Samsung Galaxy S10 Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12	157 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.10"	3040x1440
85.8 %	10/2019	OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640	190 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
89 %	10/2019	Huawei Mate 30 Pro Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16	198 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.53"	2400x1176
83.3 %	11/2019	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	966 (923^min - 995^max) MBit/s +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	637 (584^min - 715^max) MBit/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	882 (847^min - 902^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (558^min - 592^max) MBit/s -34%
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	529 (204^min - 603^max) MBit/s -40%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	422 (238^min - 447^max) MBit/s -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	327 (321^min - 333^max) MBit/s -63%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1010 (912^min - 1092^max) MBit/s +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	533 (468^min - 602^max) MBit/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	827 (791^min - 846^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (612^min - 683^max) MBit/s -23%
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	563 (490^min - 597^max) MBit/s -32%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	430 (374^min - 485^max) MBit/s -48%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -55%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	331 (317^min - 341^max) MBit/s -60%

Samsung Galaxy S20; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (791-846)

Samsung Galaxy S20; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø882 (847-902)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

Galaxy S20 with patch G980FXXU1ATCH applied

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20: 8.75 ∆E min: 3.08 - max: 13.83 ∆E


743 cd/m²	731 cd/m²	737 cd/m²
750 cd/m²	745 cd/m²	747 cd/m²
741 cd/m²	731 cd/m²	739 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 750 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 740.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 745 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.092

	Samsung Galaxy S20 AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.20	Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.10	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.10	OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Huawei Mate 30 Pro OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen		23%	-25%	-24%	-14%	-44%
Brightness middle	745	679 -9%	701 -6%	693 -7%	592 -21%	625 -16%
Brightness	740	671 -9%	705 -5%	703 -5%	605 -18%	607 -18%
Brightness Distribution	97	93 -4%	98 1%	96 -1%	96 -1%	89 -8%
Black Level *		0.68
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.67	0.8 70%	3.7 -39%	3.42 -28%	2.5 6%	4.38 -64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.52	2.4 47%	10.3 -128%	6.12 -35%	5.5 -22%	6.83 -51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	1.1 45%	1.4 30%	3.3 -65%	2.6 -30%	4.1 -105%
Gamma	2.092 ^105%	2.24 ^98%	2.1 ^105%	2.265 ^97%	2.16 ^102%	2.251 ^98%
CCT	6240 ^104%	6610 ^98%	6553 ^99%	6799 ^96%	6173 ^105%	7251 ^90%
Contrast		999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	903 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	781 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	543 Points -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (903 - 944, n=5)	929 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points +1%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2731 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3062 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1727 Points -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2731 - 2899, n=5)	2800 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points +9%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3670 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4043 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	920 Points -75%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3670 - 3804, n=2)	3737 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=52, last 2 years)	7719 Points +110%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	14708 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9750 Points -34%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10286 Points -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	13947 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	9052 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (13627 - 14760, n=5)	14391 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10431 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7595 Points -27%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8702 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10322 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7558 Points -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (10008 - 11784, n=5)	10612 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +4%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5646 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8136 Points +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6815 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (5646 - 8097, n=5)	6920 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6388 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10781 Points +69%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7671 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3498 Points -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6388 - 11488, n=5)	9004 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4015 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4377 Points +9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4900 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3191 Points -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3846 - 4124, n=5)	3990 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7981 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	9199 Points +15%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8531 Points +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7098 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3535 Points -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (7385 - 8485, n=5)	7798 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11301 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	17853 Points +58%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11433 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7970 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3646 Points -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (9470 - 11868, n=5)	10329 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3935 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3411 Points -13%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4517 Points +15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5133 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3193 Points -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3935 - 4455, n=5)	4240 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6732 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4400 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4383 Points -35%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6319 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6048 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2394 Points -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6544 - 6896, n=5)	6733 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)	2738 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8411 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5726 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5176 Points -38%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7150 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6478 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2237 Points -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (8005 - 8469, n=5)	8260 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)	2733 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3963 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2429 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2854 Points -28%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4492 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4909 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3171 Points -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3963 - 4267, n=5)	4091 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)	3156 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6638 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6067 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4551 Points -31%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6875 Points +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6382 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2561 Points -61%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6638 - 7459, n=5)	7083 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)	6705 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8106 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	8119 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5358 Points -34%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7977 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6657 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2425 Points -70%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (870 - 9190, n=5)	7112 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)	9675 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4063 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3219 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2981 Points -27%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4635 Points +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5576 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3188 Points -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4063 - 4495, n=5)	4284 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)	4216 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5139 Points
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5530 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5570 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2265 Points -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (5042 - 6355, n=5)	5599 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=100, last 2 years)	2654 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6315 Points
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6640 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6369 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2153 Points -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6136 - 8783, n=5)	7254 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=100, last 2 years)	2829 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3112 Points
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3489 Points +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3870 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2768 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3104 - 3230, n=5)	3154 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=100, last 2 years)	2672 Points -14%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (60 - 119, n=5)	81.8 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	199 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	322 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	143 fps -28%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps -58%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (145 - 200, n=5)	186.8 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +24%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -12%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (59 - 90, n=5)	65.8 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +20%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	108 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	175 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps -21%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	112 fps +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	106 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -62%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (96 - 126, n=5)	108.8 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +30%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	59 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	30 fps -49%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	58 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	73 fps +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps -54%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (58 - 61, n=5)	59 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +3%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	85 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	117 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -38%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	56 fps -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (65 - 85, n=5)	77.4 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +16%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	43 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps -47%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	34 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (34 - 45, n=5)	42 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +1%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	73 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps -30%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	41 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (38 - 51, n=5)	47.6 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +20%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	25 fps -50%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	40 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (49 - 52, n=5)	50.8 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)	43.9 fps -12%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	54 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	87 fps +61%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	44 fps -19%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps -13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (43 - 58, n=5)	53.4 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)	64 fps +19%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +173%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps -27%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	27 fps +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	26 fps +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (22 - 34, n=5)	29.8 fps +35%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)	32.7 fps +49%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	20 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps -15%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	18 fps -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps -50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (20 - 23, n=5)	21.8 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)	25.5 fps +28%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	504192 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	483224 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	266417 Points -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (296746 - 527820, n=5)	469996 Points -7%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	71.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.35 (8.77^min - 77.53^max) fps -46%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	33.9 (9.36^min - 74.72^max) fps -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15.63 fps -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (71.4 - 71.6, n=2)	71.5 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	42.32 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.16 (8.36^min - 61.33^max) fps -36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31.12 (11.09^min - 63.1^max) fps -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	14.01 fps -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (42.3 - 63, n=2)	52.7 fps +25%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	84.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	33.04 (9.22^min - 75.78^max) fps -61%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	29.22 (4.07^min - 95.16^max) fps -65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17.2 fps -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)	84.9 fps +1%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4786 Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4997 Score +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2036 Score -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4607 - 4957, n=3)	4783 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +25%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4764 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4320 Points -9%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5124 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5389 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3392 Points -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4764 - 4915, n=5)	4815 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +21%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8843 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7476 Points -15%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8988 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9309 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6445 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (8843 - 9478, n=5)	9209 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4271 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4570 Points +7%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4869 Points +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6130 Points +44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4281 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3775 - 4497, n=5)	4037 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10703 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7361 Points -31%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10611 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10112 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3878 Points -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (10646 - 10803, n=5)	10744 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +33%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1274 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1385 Points +9%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1485 Points +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1462 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1237 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (1270 - 1439, n=5)	1351 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +17%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	132.9 Points +147%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +97%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	65.9 Points +22%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	65.3 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	53.9 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)	53.8 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	46.04 Points -15%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	293.4 Points +214%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	120.8 Points +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	115.5 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	93.5 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)	92.8 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	84 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	79.2 Points -15%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	157 runs/min +209%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +111%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	74.1 runs/min +46%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)	69.1 runs/min +36%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)	60.4 runs/min +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	54 runs/min +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)	50.8 runs/min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	43.3 runs/min -15%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	184 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	119 Points +23%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	100 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	97 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)	94.4 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	77 Points -21%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	48819 Points +169%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points +84%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	25353 Points +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	23568 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20286 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)	19019 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	18162 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	16241 Points -11%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	2770 ms * -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	2511 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)	2387 ms * +5%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	2021 ms * +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	1963 ms * +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1924 ms * +23%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +36%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	573 ms * +77%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S20	Samsung Galaxy S10	OnePlus 7T	Huawei Mate 30 Pro	Xiaomi Mi Note 10	Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-35%	-45%	7%	-57%	-6%	26%
Sequential Read 256KB	1542	832 -46%	1406 -9%	1781 15%	480.5 -69%	1520 ?(1406 - 1692, n=13) -1%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) -2%
Sequential Write 256KB	670	193.2 -71%	218.4 -67%	401.8 -40%	243.6 -64%	546 ?(213 - 740, n=13) -19%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 67%
Random Read 4KB	205.3	137.4 -33%	170.1 -17%	226.4 10%	106.2 -48%	206 ?(170.1 - 253, n=13) 0%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 20%
Random Write 4KB	228.1	24.44 -89%	29.9 -87%	259.2 14%	118.9 -48%	193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13) -15%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	66.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 17%		82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card) 24%		67.3 ?(34.6 - 81.6, n=8) 2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	57.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%		69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card) 20%		55.7 ?(30.7 - 66.4, n=8) -3%

Samsung Galaxy S20; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø39.4 (35-42)

Samsung Galaxy S20; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø39.6 (32-42)

Samsung Galaxy S20; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (59-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (59-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø58.5 (40-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø57.8 (38-61)

Max. Load

Idle


45.4 °C	44.9 °C	41.2 °C
46.2 °C	45.3 °C	41.6 °C
46.7 °C	45.2 °C	41.1 °C

Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 44.2 °C


37.5 °C	41.3 °C	41.4 °C
38.8 °C	42.3 °C	43.3 °C
37.6 °C	41.7 °C	42.2 °C

Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 40.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 72.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 72.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 72.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Load	4.8 / 11.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 990	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-9%	16%	-2%	11%	4%	2%	7%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.56 38%	0.61 32%	0.9 -0%	0.87 3%	0.7 22%	0.846 ?(0.65 - 1, n=5) 6%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	1.5	2.99 -99%	1.27 15%	1.4 7%	1.75 -17%	1.8 -20%	1.534 ?(1.06 - 1.91, n=5) -2%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Maximum *	2	3.02 -51%	1.3 35%	2.9 -45%	1.83 8%	2.2 -10%	1.858 ?(1.49 - 2.3, n=5) 7%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	4.8	4.17 13%	6.17 -29%	4.7 2%	3.85 20%	5.2 -8%	5.14 ?(4.72 - 5.8, n=5) -7%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -16%
Load Maximum *	11.5	5.44 53%	8.55 26%	8.3 28%	6.64 42%	7.5 35%	10.7 ?(9.99 - 11.8, n=5) 7%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		35h 05min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 39min

	Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh
Battery Runtime		22%	-29%	10%	8%	43%
Reader / Idle	2105	2765 31%	1259 -40%	2003 -5%	2174 3%	2134 1%
H.264	809	1147 42%	842 4%	967 20%	1098 36%	1423 76%
WiFi v1.3	726	866 19%	427 -41%	896 23%	823 13%	1127 55%
Load	279	267 -4%	170 -39%	283 1%	219 -22%	387 39%

Pros

+ 纤薄轻巧的外壳

+ 最新的软件

+ LTE宽带支持

+ 支持8K视频

+ 出色且非常明亮的120 Hz显示屏

+ 60 Hz游戏

+ 续航时间长

+ 5G可选

Cons

- 没有aptX HD

- 定位服务有时并非特别准确

- 许多视频支持仅高达FHD / 30fps

- Exynos SoC降频明显

- 负载下高温

- 没有真正的长焦镜头

Verdict – Very Good, but not Best of the Best

三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测. Review united provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Galaxy S智能手机是一台优秀的高端设备，但已经几乎无法在智能手机的所有方面跟上竞争对手，这已经成为一种传统。例如，网络更慢，续航更短，充电时间更长，Wi-Fi性能更低，其他智能手机以相同的价格提供更多的存储空间。使用基于Exynos的S20设备的欧洲客户受到的打击尤其严重，因为这些SKU的性能比其骁龙产品低，并且对5G的支持不够灵活。

话虽如此，三星Galaxy S20仍然是一款非常出色的高端智能手机，手小的人会比较喜欢其纤薄而纤巧的外壳。它还提供了现代却保守的设计，而且重量轻。

最新的UI非常受用户欢迎，手机提供了多种支持的LTE频率，以及非常快的4G甚至5G调制解调器。它的相机可以拍摄出精美的照片，尤其是在弱光条件下。最新的补丁修复了早期的许多问题。它的三镜头相机具有可微调的混合光学变焦，可以被认为是高端智能手机领域的平均水平，但这并不能阻止我们喜欢它。这款屏幕再次表现出色，并且可以轻松轻松地超越所有竞争对手，并且亮度和色彩准确性均比其前身有所提高。

我们并不特别喜欢它在负载下的高温以及CPU严重的热节流。考虑到S20的电池寿命显着提高，这实在可惜。

三星Galaxy S20本可以延长续航时间，提供超亮显示屏和出色的相机。不幸的是，它也有其独特的‘怪癖’。

三星Galaxy S20的智能手机都具有非常独特的缺陷和怪癖，并且很难跟上华为，苹果或OnePlus之类的产品。但是，如果您不追求最高的性能，如果您喜欢灵活的相机，并且正在寻找紧凑型智能手机，那么三星Galaxy S20绝对值得您考虑。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy S20 - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

51 / 70 → 73%

Weight

91%

Battery

89%

Display

92%

Games Performance

56 / 64 → 87%

Application Performance

75 / 86 → 87%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 89%

Camera

78%

Average

81%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测：有些怪诞的高质量智能手机

Florian Schmitt, 2020-06- 1 (Update: 2020-06- 1)

三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测：有些怪诞的高质量智能手机

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy S20 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Verdict – Very Good, but not Best of the Best

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare