Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测:有些怪诞的高质量智能手机

紧凑的Galaxy。 三星的Galaxy S20是最著名的智能手机系列之一的最新更新。 紧凑的尺寸和强大的性能是肯定的,但是最新的Galaxy智能手机还应该具有改进的摄像头和更长的续航时间。在我们的全面评测中了解三星是否成功实现了这一目标。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Zewei Shen),
Android ARM Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Galaxy S20 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR5
Display
6.2 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 566 PPI, 10点触控, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB Type-C电缆, Card Reader: 高达1 TB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计,陀螺仪,接近传感器,指南针,气压计
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900); UMTS (1, 2, 4, 5, 8); LTE (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 151.7 x 69.1
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f / 2.0,相位检测AF,OIS,视频@ 4320p / 24fps(相机1); 12 MP,f / 1.8,相位检测自动对焦(双像素),OIS,LED闪光灯(2号相机); 12.0MP,f / 2.2,广角镜头(3号相机)
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix f / 2.2,相位检测自动对焦(双像素),视频@ 2160p / 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 混合立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, S-Pen,SIM工具,S-Pen使用指南,USB Type-C耳机,适配器, 24 Months Warranty, 下载-LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA 2 Gbps; 上传-Cat.20 3CA 316 Mbps。 SAR值:身体– 1.523 W / kg,头部– 0.209 W / kg。 ANT +; IP68认证。无风扇,防水 重量:机身:163克;充电器:49克, fanless, waterproof
Weight
163 g, Power Supply: 49 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
163 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.2"3200x1440
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
87 %
04/2019
Samsung Galaxy S10
Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12
157 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.1"3040x1440
86 %
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
89 %
10/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
83 %
11/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
827 (min: 791, max: 846) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼63% -23%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼56% -32%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼43% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼33% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=553)
264 MBit/s ∼26% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
882 (min: 847, max: 902) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼60% -34%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼55% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼44% -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼34% -63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=553)
250 MBit/s ∼26% -72%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (791-846)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø882 (847-902)
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – turnaround
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – turnaround
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turnaround
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turnaround
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Galaxy S20 with patch G980FXXU1ATCH applied
Galaxy S20 with patch G980FXXU1ATCH applied
Wide-angle lens photo
Wide-angle lens photo
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
3x hybrid-optical zoom photo
3x hybrid-optical zoom photo
Maximum digital zoom photo
Maximum digital zoom photo
ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
31 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20: 26.85 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 36.45 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20: 8.75 ∆E min: 3.08 - max: 13.83 ∆E
743
cd/m²
731
cd/m²
737
cd/m²
750
cd/m²
745
cd/m²
747
cd/m²
741
cd/m²
731
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 750 cd/m² Average: 740.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 745 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.092
Samsung Galaxy S20
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
23%
-25%
-24%
-14%
-44%
Brightness middle
745
679
-9%
701
-6%
693
-7%
592
-21%
625
-16%
Brightness
740
671
-9%
705
-5%
703
-5%
605
-18%
607
-18%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
98
1%
96
-1%
96
-1%
89
-8%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.67
0.8
70%
3.7
-39%
3.42
-28%
2.5
6%
4.38
-64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.52
2.4
47%
10.3
-128%
6.12
-35%
5.5
-22%
6.83
-51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.1
45%
1.4
30%
3.3
-65%
2.6
-30%
4.1
-105%
Gamma
2.092 105%
2.24 98%
2.1 105%
2.265 97%
2.16 102%
2.251 98%
CCT
6240 104%
6610 98%
6553 99%
6799 96%
6173 105%
7251 90%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18084 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3670 Points ∼91%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points ∼23% -75%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3670 - 3804, n=2)
3737 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=64)
1663 Points ∼41% -55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2731 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼56% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=3)
2815 Points ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=80)
1987 Points ∼65% -27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
903 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼58% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=3)
929 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=80)
567 Points ∼61% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10431 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10255 - 10583, n=3)
10423 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=481)
5778 Points ∼55% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14708 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (14307 - 14760, n=3)
14592 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=639)
6320 Points ∼43% -57%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3112 Points ∼80%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼90% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼72% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3112 - 3230, n=3)
3181 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=141)
2641 Points ∼68% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6315 Points ∼80%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼84% +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼27% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6315 - 8783, n=3)
7919 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=141)
2919 Points ∼37% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5139 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼93% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼94% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼38% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5139 - 6355, n=3)
5925 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=141)
2627 Points ∼44% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4063 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼58% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼53% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼83% +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼57% -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=3)
4335 Points ∼78% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5766, n=487)
2155 Points ∼39% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8106 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼92% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼61% -34%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼90% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼75% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼28% -70%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8106 - 9190, n=3)
8818 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=487)
2041 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6638 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼85% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼63% -31%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼96% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼89% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼36% -61%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=3)
7170 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=488)
1895 Points ∼26% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3935 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼66% -13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼88% +15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼62% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=3)
4275 Points ∼83% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5721, n=517)
2065 Points ∼40% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11301 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼45% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼20% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11301, n=3)
10081 Points ∼56% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=517)
2713 Points ∼15% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7981 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼38% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7563 - 7981, n=3)
7707 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=517)
2282 Points ∼25% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3963 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼49% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼58% -28%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼92% +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼65% -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=3)
4137 Points ∼84% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=567)
2040 Points ∼42% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8411 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼27% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8257 - 8469, n=3)
8379 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=567)
1706 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6732 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼64% -35%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼93% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼35% -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6732 - 6896, n=3)
6821 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=568)
1630 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4015 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼89% +9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼65% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3889 - 4124, n=3)
4009 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=609)
1906 Points ∼39% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6388 Points ∼59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100% +69%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼71% +20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼32% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=3)
8089 Points ∼75% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=608)
2232 Points ∼21% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5646 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼84% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼42% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8010, n=3)
6451 Points ∼79% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=611)
1926 Points ∼24% -66%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼44% -28%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼47% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼26% -58%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (199 - 200, n=3)
199 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=763)
43.2 fps ∼13% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼74% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=3)
79.7 fps ∼100% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=772)
30.2 fps ∼38% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
108 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼49% -21%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼61% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼23% -62%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (100 - 126, n=3)
111 fps ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=668)
25.4 fps ∼15% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=676)
21.5 fps ∼36% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼45% -38%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼48% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼26% -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (72 - 85, n=3)
80.7 fps ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=531)
20.5 fps ∼18% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼41% -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼79% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼37% -54%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 59, n=3)
58.7 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=533)
18.7 fps ∼26% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45% +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼43% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼17% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 33, n=3)
29.3 fps ∼49% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=279)
11.1 fps ∼19% -50%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
20 fps ∼61%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼52% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼55% -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼58% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼30% -50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼65% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=277)
8.02 fps ∼24% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼42% -50%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼67% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 52, n=3)
51 fps ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=283)
16.5 fps ∼28% -67%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
54 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼51% -19%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54% -13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼21% -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (54 - 58, n=3)
56 fps ∼64% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=282)
19.1 fps ∼22% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼68%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼48% -30%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼23% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 51, n=3)
50.3 fps ∼69% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=456)
13.9 fps ∼19% -72%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
43 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼38% -47%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼57% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 45, n=3)
44 fps ∼73% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=460)
12.3 fps ∼21% -71%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
504192 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 504192, n=3)
433215 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=85)
314485 Points ∼62% -38%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
84.06 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼39% -61%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼34% -65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17.2 fps ∼20% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼23% -77%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
42.32 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼52% -36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
14.01 fps ∼27% -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼30% -62%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
71.58 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼54% -46%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼47% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15.63 fps ∼22% -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼28% -72%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4786 Score ∼96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2036 Score ∼41% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=82)
2609 Score ∼52% -45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1274 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼93% +9%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼98% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1378, n=3)
1307 Points ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=700)
801 Points ∼54% -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10703 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼68% -31%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼36% -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10703 - 10803, n=3)
10762 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=700)
2390 Points ∼22% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4271 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼75% +7%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼79% +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=3)
4181 Points ∼68% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8398, n=700)
1769 Points ∼29% -59%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8843 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼80% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼97% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼69% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=3)
9201 Points ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=700)
3334 Points ∼36% -62%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4764 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼80% -9%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼95% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼63% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=3)
4819 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6205, n=700)
1690 Points ∼31% -65%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +147%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼50% +22%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
53.863 Points ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 53.9, n=3)
52.1 Points ∼39% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼35% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=163)
39.7 Points ∼30% -26%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +214%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼39% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
93.499 Points ∼32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 93.5, n=3)
90.8 Points ∼31% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
84.005 Points ∼29% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼27% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=593)
45.9 Points ∼16% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +209%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼47% +46%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44% +36%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 63.7, n=3)
59.1 runs/min ∼38% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
54 runs/min ∼34% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)
50.8 runs/min ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼28% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=147)
42.7 runs/min ∼27% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +90%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼65% +23%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
97 Points ∼53%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 97, n=3)
89.7 Points ∼49% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼42% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=227)
69.6 Points ∼38% -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +169%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52% +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼42% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 19122, n=3)
18459 Points ∼38% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
18162 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼33% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=758)
7596 Points ∼16% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=784)
9968 ms * ∼100% -297%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼28% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
2511.2 ms * ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2345 - 2511, n=3)
2448 ms * ∼25% +3%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼20% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼20% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼19% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +77%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S20Samsung Galaxy S10OnePlus 7THuawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-45%
7%
-57%
-6%
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
20%
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
3%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
24%
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
9%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
4%
Random Write 4KB
228.1
24.44
-89%
29.9
-87%
259.21
14%
118.9
-48%
182 (29.9 - 230, n=9)
-20%
32 (0.14 - 319, n=846)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
205.3
137.4
-33%
170.1
-17%
226.38
10%
106.2
-48%
194 (170 - 207, n=9)
-6%
56.1 (1.59 - 324, n=846)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
669.9
193.24
-71%
218.4
-67%
401.79
-40%
243.6
-64%
527 (213 - 697, n=9)
-21%
119 (2.99 - 911, n=846)
-82%
Sequential Read 256KB
1541.7
831.94
-46%
1406
-9%
1780.5
15%
480.5
-69%
1511 (1406 - 1632, n=9)
-2%
323 (12.1 - 1802, n=846)
-79%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø39.4 (35-42)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø39.6 (32-42)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (59-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (59-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø57.8 (38-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø58.5 (40-61)
Max. Load
 45.4 °C44.9 °C41.2 °C 
 46.2 °C45.3 °C41.6 °C 
 46.7 °C45.2 °C41.1 °C 
Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 44.2 °C
37.5 °C41.3 °C41.4 °C
38.8 °C42.3 °C43.3 °C
37.6 °C41.7 °C42.2 °C
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.341.32537.538312933.54031.633.15033.237.36328.328.88023.325.410023.323.812524.231.216020.540.92001945.825017.650.231516.952.540016.255.450016.463.263018.365.180016.166.7100014.772.7125014.276.6160014.777.2200013.976.2250014.377.4315014.975.8400014.873.8500015.369.4630014.965.280001567.41000015.5691250016.462.6160001662.7SPL72.427.585.9N26.1159.7median 16median 65.2Delta210.739.434.728.327.118.722.126.726.333.235.722.629.221.824.224.423.923.834.918.551.817.151.517.858.915.561.314.164.51468.813.86714.770.815.473.415.275.314.375.514.576.413.977.414.678.714.180.314.377.514.575.214.871.614.866.814.8611555.426.8880.872median 14.8median 68.81.510.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S20Samsung Galaxy S10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Load midlight 4.8 / 11.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
16%
-2%
11%
4%
-4%
9%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.56
38%
0.61
32%
0.9
-0%
0.87
3%
0.7
22%
0.887 (0.76 - 1, n=3)
1%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=859)
2%
Idle Average *
1.5
2.99
-99%
1.27
15%
1.4
7%
1.75
-17%
1.8
-20%
1.703 (1.5 - 1.91, n=3)
-14%
1.751 (0.6 - 6.2, n=858)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
2
3.02
-51%
1.3
35%
2.9
-45%
1.83
8%
2.2
-10%
2.09 (1.96 - 2.3, n=3)
-5%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=859)
-2%
Load Average *
4.8
4.17
13%
6.17
-29%
4.7
2%
3.85
20%
5.2
-8%
5.11 (4.72 - 5.8, n=3)
-6%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=853)
15%
Load Maximum *
11.5
5.44
53%
8.55
26%
8.3
28%
6.64
42%
7.5
35%
11.2 (10.2 - 11.8, n=3)
3%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=853)
48%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
35h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 39min
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Battery Runtime
22%
-29%
10%
8%
43%
Reader / Idle
2105
2765
31%
1259
-40%
2003
-5%
2174
3%
2134
1%
H.264
809
1147
42%
842
4%
967
20%
1098
36%
1423
76%
WiFi v1.3
726
866
19%
427
-41%
896
23%
823
13%
1127
55%
Load
279
267
-4%
170
-39%
283
1%
219
-22%
387
39%

Pros

+ 纤薄轻巧的外壳
+ 最新的软件
+ LTE宽带支持
+ 支持8K视频
+ 出色且非常明亮的120 Hz显示屏
+ 60 Hz游戏
+ 续航时间长
+ 5G可选

Cons

- 没有aptX HD
- 定位服务有时并非特别准确
- 许多视频支持仅高达FHD / 30fps
- Exynos SoC降频明显
- 负载下高温
- 没有真正的长焦镜头

Verdict – Very Good, but not Best of the Best

三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测. Review united provided by notebooksbilliger.de
三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测. Review united provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Galaxy S智能手机是一台优秀的高端设备,但已经几乎无法在智能手机的所有方面跟上竞争对手,这已经成为一种传统。例如,网络更慢,续航更短,充电时间更长,Wi-Fi性能更低,其他智能手机以相同的价格提供更多的存储空间。使用基于Exynos的S20设备的欧洲客户受到的打击尤其严重,因为这些SKU的性能比其骁龙产品低,并且对5G的支持不够灵活。

话虽如此,三星Galaxy S20仍然是一款非常出色的高端智能手机,手小的人会比较喜欢其纤薄而纤巧的外壳。它还提供了现代却保守的设计,而且重量轻。

最新的UI非常受用户欢迎,手机提供了多种支持的LTE频率,以及非常快的4G甚至5G调制解调器。它的相机可以拍摄出精美的照片,尤其是在弱光条件下。最新的补丁修复了早期的许多问题。它的三镜头相机具有可微调的混合光学变焦,可以被认为是高端智能手机领域的平均水平,但这并不能阻止我们喜欢它。这款屏幕再次表现出色,并且可以轻松轻松地超越所有竞争对手,并且亮度和色彩准确性均比其前身有所提高。

我们并不特别喜欢它在负载下的高温以及CPU严重的热节流。考虑到S20的电池寿命显着提高,这实在可惜。

三星Galaxy S20本可以延长续航时间,提供超亮显示屏和出色的相机。不幸的是,它也有其独特的‘怪癖’。

三星Galaxy S20的智能手机都具有非常独特的缺陷和怪癖,并且很难跟上华为,苹果或OnePlus之类的产品。但是,如果您不追求最高的性能,如果您喜欢灵活的相机,并且正在寻找紧凑型智能手机,那么三星Galaxy S20绝对值得您考虑。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy S20 - 03/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
91%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
56 / 64 → 87%
Application Performance
75 / 86 → 87%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
78%
Average
80%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S20智能手机评测:有些怪诞的高质量智能手机
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06- 1 (Update: 2020-06- 1)