Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPhone SE 2022智能手机评测--拥有5G和复古魅力的平价iPhone小矮人

虽小,但令人惊叹! iPhone SE在2022年变得更加昂贵,但仍然继续成为最实惠的Apple 智能手机。得益于其非常先进的A15芯片,就性能而言,它在同价位产品中应该很难被击败。但是,考虑到强大的内部替代品,iPhone SE是否仍然值得关注?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Apple ARM 5G iPhone Smartphone
Apple iPhone SE 2022年

在过去,事情是可以预测的:每年都有新的iPhone,你只能买到老一代的库存剩余产品或二手产品。如今,Apple ,提供了一个更广泛的产品系列,仍然在销售两年前的 iPhone 11也提供iPhone SE,其目标是那些喜欢支付中档价格,不需要任何高端噱头的人。

在这次测试中,我们仔细看看最新的更新,即iPhone SE 3,也叫iPhone SE第三代或iPhone SE 2022。 虽然上一代产品是在2020年诞生的,但从视觉上几乎无法区分它们。当你购买后看一看账单,你可以看到制造商将价格提高了40欧元(约44美元)。

让我们来看看,新的iPhone SE 2022在我们的测试中表现如何。

Apple iPhone SE 2022
Processor
Apple A15 Bionic 6 x - 3.2 GHz
Graphics adapter
Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
4.70 inch 16:9, 1334 x 750 pixel 326 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Retina HD, IPS, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB SSD, 64 GB 
, 52 GB free
Connections
Audio Connections: audio via Lightning port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, Lightning port
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B30/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B46/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n28/​n30/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78/​n79) , LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 138.4 x 67.3
Battery
2018 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20 Watt charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, OIS, quad-LED flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/​2.2, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, USB-C to Lightning cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.980W/​kg (head), 0.990W/​kg (body); IP67-certified , fanless, waterproof
Weight
144 g
Price
519 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.1 %
04/2022
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
144 g64 GB SSD4.70"1334x750
85.2 %
04/2020
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.70"1334x750
89.8 %
10/2020
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
133 g128 GB NVMe5.40"2340x1080
83.2 %
06/2021
Sony Xperia 10 III
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
169 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2520x1080
84.9 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
87.2 %
12/2021
Google Pixel 6
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080

只有一个微小的细节可以让你区分目前的模型和2020年的iPhone SE:老款智能手机的背面有两个符号标签,一个是CE认证,另一个是告诉你电子设备不应该被扔进普通垃圾桶。新款iPhone SE没有显示这些标签,尽管它们当然仍然有效。

总的来说,外观仍然对应于 iPhone 82017年的产品,而且有白色、黑色和红色,Apple ,也没有改变颜色的选择。显示屏上下的宽边框也依然存在,而且在Home键上,继续有一个物理键来返回主屏幕。iPhone SE 2022是Apple ,是唯一一款官方提供的仍然包括这个的iPhone。

外壳继续由铝和玻璃制成,显示出高质量的工艺。正面和背面现在采用了iPhone-13系列的新保护玻璃,这应该是为了使智能手机更加坚固。Apple ,与前代产品相比,它能够减去一点重量,但与前代产品相比,4克(约0.14盎司)的重量在日常使用中应该很难被发现。虽然iPhone SE 2022的尺寸并不像目前的iPhone mini那样小,但它仍然是目前最紧凑的智能手机之一。

这款手机壳通过了IP67标准的认证,所以它仍然是防尘的,并且可以在掉入水中后存活。

Apple iPhone SE 2022年
Apple iPhone SE 2022年
Apple iPhone SE 2022年
Apple iPhone SE 2022年
Apple iPhone SE 2022年
Apple iPhone SE 2022年

尺寸比较

158.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.9 mm 207 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g154 mm 68 mm 8.3 mm 169 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 144 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g131.5 mm 64.2 mm 7.4 mm 133 g

设备--价格略高,有更多的工作记忆

与前代产品相比,设备的变化原来很小。继续有一个Lightning ,根据USB2.0标准传输数据。在这一点上,Apple"的智能手机中的NFC芯片可以被更广泛地使用,但NFC不能像Android 那样被停用。

最新的蓝牙版本仍然无法使用,你必须满足于蓝牙5.0。

虽然存储选项保持不变,为4GB,但现在有了更多的内存。所有的价格都提高了40欧元(约44美元)。

  • iPhone SE 2022 4GB内存/64GB存储。519欧元(约合人民币565元)
  • iPhone SE 2022 4GB内存/128GB存储。569欧元(约合人民币619元)
  • iPhone SE 2022 4GB内存/256GB存储空间。689欧元(约合人民币750元)
左边:通知滑块,音量摇杆
左边:通知滑块,音量摇杆
右边。SIM卡插槽,待机键
右边。SIM卡插槽,待机键
顶部:没有连接
顶部:没有连接
底部:麦克风、Lightning 端口、扬声器
底部:麦克风、Lightning 端口、扬声器

软件 - 现代iOS 15.4

许多Apple 用户认为,Apple 为其设备提供非常长的更新周期是最重要的优势之一:通常智能手机提供的更新至少为5年,有些甚至更长。比如说 iPhone 7仍应该得到iOS 16。

在iPhone SE 2022上,安装了现代的iOS 15.4,这是最新的版本,其所有功能都可用。 例如,你可以使用FaceTime的扩展功能,在视频通话中分享内容,为你的房子或汽车存入虚拟钥匙,或默认在照片中使用光学字符识别。

Apple iPhone SE 2022年iOS 15.4软件
Apple iPhone SE 2022年iOS 15.4软件
Apple iPhone SE 2022年iOS 15.4软件

通信和GNSS - iPhone SE是一款拥有5G的世界手机

在通信选项中,我们终于发现了一个重要的区别,即 iPhone SE 2020由于其在4G网络中广泛而丰富的频率覆盖,你也可以毫无问题地在该网络中进行全球冲浪。此外,高达1.2Gbit/s的数据速率比前代产品略高。

iPhone SE 2022在5G和4G网络中的接收效果很好,在我们的随机样本测试中可以与高端智能手机相比。

在WLAN方面,有WiFi 6与2x2 MIMO。在与我们的华硕GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中,传输速率略高于前代产品,但仍然无法完全跟上最快的智能手机。另一方面,速度非常稳定,我们也喜欢有障碍物阻挡时的WLAN范围和接收强度。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼92%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
802 (421min - 857max) MBit/s ∼90%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
792 (711min - 841max) MBit/s ∼89%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
504 (479min - 524max) MBit/s ∼57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=236, last 2 years)
481 MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
895 (870min - 907max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s ∼98%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼69%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
578 (496min - 596max) MBit/s ∼65%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (513min - 573max) MBit/s ∼62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=236, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
746 (599min - 768max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
888 (869min - 906max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø746 (599-768)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø888 (869-906)

为了确定iPhone的位置,支持目前最重要的卫星系统,包括GPS、Glonass、Galileo、QZSS和BeiDou。在我们的测试中,智能手机总是能够非常迅速地找到足够的卫星。

在我们的实际测试中,以Garmin Venu 2作为比较导航设备的自行车之旅,iPhone的定位系统显示其相当准确。尽管路线记录有时除了实际的路线之外,还很少,但当你依赖准确的导航信息时,你一般也可以使用iPhone SE 2022。

iPhone SE 2022年的定位 - 概述
iPhone SE 2022年的定位 - 概述
iPhone SE 2022年的定位 - 转
iPhone SE 2022年的定位 - 转
iPhone SE 2022年的定位--桥梁
iPhone SE 2022年的定位--桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的定位--转向
Garmin Venu 2的定位--转向
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁

电话功能和语音质量--有时很清晰,有时又有点闷。

即使只有一个SIM卡插槽,你仍然可以利用Apple 手机的eSIM功能实现双SIM功能。当然,也支持VoLTE和VoWiFi。

使用听筒的语音质量令人满意,即使我们对话伙伴的声音听起来并不完全干净,特别是在高音量下。另一方面,麦克风可以非常清晰地传递我们自己的声音。然而,噪音抑制的操作速度可以再快一点。使用免提模式,我们的对话伙伴的声音被传输得很容易理解,但稍微有点闷。在这种模式下,我们也不应该说得太小声,因为否则,麦克风将无法识别我们的声音。

相机 - 良好的单镜头相机,选择不多

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

背面的单镜头相机提供光学图像稳定功能,传感器具有1200万像素的分辨率。闪光灯包括四个不同颜色的LED,其照明是自动组合的。

乍一看,后面的相机传感器的规格看起来与 iPhone SE 2020。然而,新版本的紧凑型智能手机受益于前几年由Apple ,如智能HDR 4,深度融合,以及图像质量的自动改进。这对那些只想点击拍照的人来说是很好的,但那些喜欢自己调整记录参数的人将需要自己的应用程序,因为Apple's标准相机软件在这方面只提供了一点自由。

来自主摄像头的图像继续显示出良好的质量,色彩鲜艳,细节多,清晰度高。在周围环境的示例图片中,天空看起来非常清晰,几乎没有显示任何像素伪影。对于同价位的智能手机来说,iPhone SE 2022在白天拍摄的照片确实不错。虽然iPhone SE在低光照条件下的照片亮度相当好,但照片很快就变得浑浊。没有特别的夜间模式。

用iPhone SE拍摄的视频看起来也很有吸引力,制造商支持以高达60帧/秒的速度拍摄4K视频。

前置摄像头继续提供700万像素的分辨率,这里拍摄的照片也显示出许多细节和良好的图像清晰度。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images

在我们的实验室里,我们还看了一下主摄像头在受控光线条件下的图像质量。在充分照明的情况下,图像很清晰,甚至在角落里也是如此。较大颜色区域的再现在这里也相当干净。在只有1勒克斯的照明下,图像清晰度明显下降,但你仍然可以相当清楚地识别图像内容。

ColorChecker
13 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2022: 10.88 ∆E min: 3.73 - max: 16.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.1 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
49.9 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
36 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2022: 35.17 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 49.87 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不带充电器,只有12个月的保修期

Apple 不再包括iPhone SE 2022的充电器了。上一代产品也只有一个非常弱的充电器,没有充分利用手机可能的充电性能,所以留下这个也不是什么损失。除了iPhone SE,包装盒现在只包括一条USB-C-to 电缆,一个SIM卡工具,以及常规的文件和 贴纸。Lightning Apple

保修期仍然只有12个月,但可以通过Apple Care+来延长,甚至可以选择防盗保护。89欧元(约合97美元),这个保修期扩展的基本版本与前代产品相比变得更加实惠。

输入设备和操作 - 可靠的触摸识别

虽然通常在iPhone中无处不在的FaceID在SE 2022中无法使用,但有TouchID,这是一个位于Home键的指纹传感器。如果你在待机状态下只轻轻地按一下,如果指纹被识别,设备就会被解锁。这工作非常可靠,但解锁时间比这方面最好的设备稍长。

触摸屏是一个60-Hz的面板。在这一点上,那些习惯于更快显示的人将认识到差异。然而,该系统的操作仍然很流畅,没有任何迟缓。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向

显示屏--在iPhone SE3中采用了明亮而准确的IPS显示屏

子像素网格
子像素网格

在显示屏方面,iPhone SE没有什么新东西,Apple ,在2022年的机型中也使用了分辨率为1334 x 750像素的独特IPS显示屏。与其他大多数这个价位的手机相比,还有 iPhone 12 mini,你将得到一个全高清分辨率的OLED显示屏。

它在分辨率方面的不足,在亮度方面得到了弥补,这里的平均亮度几乎达到650cd/m²。亮度分辨率是相当均匀的。黑色区域具有平均亮度,可以达到1655:1的良好对比度。

625
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
654
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
642
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Retina HD
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 678 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 647.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 662 cd/m²
Contrast: 1655:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.44 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.179
Apple iPhone SE 2022
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Apple iPhone 12 mini
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.40
Sony Xperia 10 III
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Google Pixel 6
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Screen
21%
18%
13%
-46%
12%
Brightness middle
662
688
4%
623
-6%
536
-19%
594
-10%
805
22%
Brightness
647
659
2%
623
-4%
540
-17%
594
-8%
805
24%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
98
7%
97
5%
99
8%
98
7%
Black Level *
0.4
0.28
30%
Contrast
1655
2457
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.44
1
31%
1
31%
1.1
24%
2.74
-90%
1.4
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.74
2.2
54%
2.1
56%
1.9
60%
6
-27%
3.7
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
1.3
24%
1.3
24%
4.2
-147%
1.8
-6%
Gamma
2.179 101%
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
2.27 97%
2.278 97%
2.29 96%
CCT
6746 96%
6790 96%
6258 104%
6494 100%
7322 89%
6507 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们在这里也没有注意到任何PWM。

在我们用CalMAN软件套件进行的测量中,我们发现该显示器相当准确地再现了颜色和灰度,但你应该为此关闭TrueTone。我们测试装置的显示屏完全覆盖了sRGB色彩空间。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼的色彩准确度
卡尔曼的色彩准确度
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

即使从非常陡峭的视角看显示屏,内容也不会显得苍白,色彩失真最多是最小。

在户外,你可以在阴天使用这款智能手机,没有任何问题。然而,在明亮的阳光下,你应该退到阴凉处,因为否则,事情会变得对眼睛很不利。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 比大多数人更快

在性能方面,Apple iPhone SE 2022是毫无疑问的:Apple ,为其小型智能手机配备了目前的 Apple A15 Bionic,这也被用于目前所有其他的iPhone手机中。有了这个,制造商使iPhone SE成为目前最快的智能手机之一。特别是在其价格级别中,iPhone SE第三代打败了任何Android 的智能手机。

在GPU方面也没有任何限制,采用的是具有5个核心的版本。这意味着,即使是目前最流行的手机游戏也可以毫无问题地以60帧运行。我们还在下面的 "游戏 "部分对此进行了仔细研究。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1741 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1590 - 1755, n=7)
1720 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
1604 Points ∼92% -8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points ∼77% -23%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1041 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points ∼46% -54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=263, last 2 years)
651 Points ∼37% -63%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
590 Points ∼34% -66%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
4788 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (4559 - 4914, n=7)
4767 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
4201 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points ∼69% -31%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
2805 Points ∼59% -41%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=263, last 2 years)
2147 Points ∼45% -55%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1716 Points ∼36% -64%
Metal Score 5.3
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
12819 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (10572 - 14115, n=6)
12657 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7252 - 14115, n=8, last 2 years)
10986 Points ∼86% -14%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
9272 Points ∼72% -28%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (8357 - 9680, n=6)
9139 Points ∼100% +9%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
8357 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7275 Points ∼80% -13%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6954 Points ∼76% -17%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
6652 Points ∼73% -20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points ∼46% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=171, last 2 years)
3298 Points ∼36% -61%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
826 Points ∼9% -90%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (8909 - 11700, n=6)
10513 Points ∼100% +18%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
8909 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
8014 Points ∼76% -10%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
7806 Points ∼74% -12%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7064 Points ∼67% -21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points ∼40% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=169, last 2 years)
3387 Points ∼32% -62%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
826 Points ∼8% -91%
Wild Life Extreme
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (2243 - 3080, n=6)
2687 Points ∼100% +12%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
2399 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
2288 Points ∼85% -5%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
2067 Points ∼77% -14%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1901 Points ∼71% -21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points ∼48% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=123, last 2 years)
1007 Points ∼37% -58%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
252 Points ∼9% -89%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1877 - 2864, n=6)
2441 Points ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
1982 Points ∼81% +6%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1877 Points ∼77%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1823 Points ∼75% -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1402 Points ∼57% -25%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points ∼51% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=120, last 2 years)
985 Points ∼40% -48%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
247 Points ∼10% -87%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
67.5 fps ∼75% +13%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼67%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 60.1, n=6)
60 fps ∼67% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps ∼66% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
54 fps ∼60% -10%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (358 - 440, n=6)
403 fps ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
358 fps ∼89%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
264 fps ∼66% -26%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps ∼62% -30%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps ∼44% -50%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
144 fps ∼36% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 428, n=204, last 2 years)
133.6 fps ∼33% -63%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
72 fps ∼18% -80%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +32%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 60.2, n=6)
60.1 fps ∼76% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼76% 0%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼76% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps ∼76% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
54.5 fps ∼69% -9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
30 fps ∼38% -50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (165.9 - 237, n=6)
211 fps ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
187 fps ∼89%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps ∼71% -20%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
148 fps ∼70% -21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps ∼59% -34%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
90 fps ∼43% -52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=204, last 2 years)
76.8 fps ∼36% -59%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
36 fps ∼17% -81%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 60.1, n=6)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps ∼97% -3%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
42 fps ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
21 fps ∼35% -65%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 154.2, n=6)
128.8 fps ∼100% +115%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
115 fps ∼89% +92%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps ∼72% +55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps ∼60% +28%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
60 fps ∼47% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=204, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼40% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps ∼20% -57%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (53.2 - 60, n=6)
57.2 fps ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
52 fps ∼87% -13%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps ∼68% -32%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=203, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼44% -56%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
12 fps ∼20% -80%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (68.8 - 99.2, n=6)
89.1 fps ∼100% +9%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
82 fps ∼92%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
66 fps ∼74% -20%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼66% -28%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps ∼53% -43%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
40 fps ∼45% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
31.4 fps ∼35% -62%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps ∼17% -82%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (59.1 - 60.1, n=5)
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps ∼80% -20%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
47 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=260, last 2 years)
27.8 fps ∼46% -54%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps ∼22% -78%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (95.9 - 119, n=6)
108 fps ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
95.9 fps ∼89%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
79 fps ∼73% -18%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps ∼67% -25%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps ∼50% -44%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
49 fps ∼45% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=261, last 2 years)
33.3 fps ∼31% -65%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
16 fps ∼15% -83%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (51.8 - 60, n=6)
56.4 fps ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
53 fps ∼88% -12%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
40 fps ∼67% -33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps ∼52% -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=261, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼32% -68%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8 fps ∼13% -87%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
39 fps ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (34.6 - 41.2, n=6)
38.1 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼74% -26%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
23 fps ∼59% -41%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps ∼54% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=261, last 2 years)
12.8 fps ∼33% -67%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps ∼15% -85%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (722973 - 813876, n=6)
774307 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
733484 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
708280 Points ∼91% -3%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
702981 Points ∼91% -4%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points ∼78% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=102, last 2 years)
550205 Points ∼71% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
344070 Points ∼44% -53%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (104532 - 107460, n=5)
105796 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
104532 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
91892 Points ∼87% -12%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points ∼67% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=121, last 2 years)
63547 Points ∼60% -39%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60807 Points ∼57% -42%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
40708 Points ∼38% -61%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
5723 Points ∼5% -95%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1132 - 1145, n=3)
1137 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1132 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
1002 Points ∼88% -11%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
856 Points ∼75% -24%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
849 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=44, last 2 years)
740 Points ∼65% -35%

在上网时,iPhone SE 2022的速度也变的非常快。由于屏幕分辨率低,它在基准测试中甚至比 iPhone 13,例如。网页的渲染速度快如闪电,大多数时候,图片在滚动时就已经加载完毕。这款智能手机在处理高要求的HTML-5网页时甚至没有出汗。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
182.6 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (173.5 - 182.6, n=6)
179.6 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 12 mini (Safari Mobile 14)
158.2 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.7 Points ∼77% -23%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
90.1 Points ∼49% -51%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=178, last 2 years)
60 Points ∼33% -67%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points ∼28% -72%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
45.36 Points ∼25% -75%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
414.4 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (383 - 414, n=6)
401 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 12 mini (Safari Mobile 14)
367.5 Points ∼89% -11%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.6 Points ∼67% -33%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
180.4 Points ∼44% -56%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=185, last 2 years)
111.4 Points ∼27% -73%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.8 Points ∼26% -74%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
82.5 Points ∼20% -80%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chome 99)
239 runs/min ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (228 - 244, n=6)
239 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 12 mini (Safari Mobile 14)
193 runs/min ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min ∼66% -34%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
104 runs/min ∼44% -56%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=163, last 2 years)
59.2 runs/min ∼25% -75%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min ∼21% -79%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
41.2 runs/min ∼17% -83%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
265 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (219 - 265, n=6)
246 Points ∼93% -7%
Apple iPhone 12 mini (Safari Mobile 14)
191 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points ∼55% -45%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
110 Points ∼42% -58%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=190, last 2 years)
89.9 Points ∼34% -66%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
74 Points ∼28% -72%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼26% -74%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
65969 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (57143 - 65969, n=6)
62743 Points ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone 12 mini (Safari Mobile 14)
57431 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points ∼74% -26%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
43376 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points ∼40% -60%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=194, last 2 years)
22238 Points ∼34% -66%
Sony Xperia 10 III
16866 Points ∼26% -74%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=196, last 2 years)
3268 ms * ∼100% -557%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
2506 ms * ∼77% -404%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * ∼55% -264%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
1034 ms * ∼32% -108%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
550 ms * ∼17% -11%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
497.2 ms * ∼15%
Apple iPhone 12 mini (Safari Mobile 14)
459.6 ms * ∼14% +8%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (414 - 497, n=6)
440 ms * ∼13% +12%

* ... smaller is better

游戏--60帧的游戏没有任何问题

我们使用Google Play商店的Armajet和PUBG Mobile游戏测试iPhone SE 2022的游戏能力。我们用软件套件GameBench来确定帧率。.

在我们的测试中,我们看到,即使是PUBG的UltraHD模式也可以毫无问题地使用。虽然你在这里不会得到60帧,但你会得到一个稳定的40帧和非常有吸引力的纹理。如果你稍微降低你的要求和图形设置,在高清分辨率下60帧也是可能的,没有任何问题。即使是快速的Armajet射击游戏也能达到稳定的60帧。

准确的触摸屏和位置传感器使游戏变得简单。然而,控制区域在屏幕上往往非常小。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.4 (58-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.9.0: Ø59.4 (58-60)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø59.2 (54-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.9.0: Ø39.2 (36-40)

排放--大幅节流

温度

智能手机的外部再次明显升温,但这些温度值仍然不是关键。

与之前其他使用A15处理器的iPhone一样,在较长时间的负载下,性能无法维持。在3DMark Wild Life和Wild Life Extreme测试运行20次后,该手机的性能分别降低了20%和40%。然而,考虑到该处理器的高性能能力,这应该对日常操作几乎没有任何影响。

Max. Load
 40.5 °C39 °C36.1 °C 
 38.7 °C37.3 °C36 °C 
 37.8 °C36.7 °C35.8 °C 
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
36.7 °C40.3 °C44.4 °C
37.7 °C39.9 °C41.2 °C
36.7 °C39 °C39.9 °C
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 39.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 (822min) % ∼100% +25%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
79.5 (39min) % ∼80%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
69.7 % ∼70% -12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
64.1 (29.3min) % ∼64% -19%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.4 (2587min) % ∼62% -23%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.1 (22.2min) % ∼53% -33%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.2 (250min) % ∼100% +62%
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
67 (1283min) % ∼68% +9%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.6 (858min) % ∼67% +8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
62.2 (7.66min) % ∼63% +1%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
61.4 (9.12min) % ∼62%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.9 (7.06min) % ∼55% -11%
051015202530354045Tooltip
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.7 (9.12-14.9)
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø8.44 (7.66-12.3)
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.78 (7.06-12.9)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.3 (39-49)
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.1 (29.3-45.7)
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.5 (22.2-41.9)
热图--正面
热图--正面
热图 - 背面
热图 - 背面

发言人

正如之前的前辈一样,立体声扬声器听起来相当响亮,总体上令人愉快。然而,在最大音量下,扬声器强调的高音有点太多,听起来不再那么饱满。它们足以让你偶尔听一段音乐,但那些想要真正好声音的人应该连接耳机或外部扬声器。要做到这一点,你可以使用Lightning ,但你需要购买一个3.5毫米音频端口的适配器。

你还可以通过蓝牙连接外部设备。然而,由于Apple 系统仍然缺乏高通公司的aptX编解码器,蓝牙声音输出仅限于SBC和AAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.551.12535.542.73131.733.64030.831.95032.236.36325.1318019.427.310020.932.312517.639.516015.847.22001348.125011.747.731510.649.940010.556.350011.963.563013.867.680015.469.6100012.771.212501674.5160012.475.9200011.675.8250013.176.5315013.174.4400013.774.2500014.271.6630014.770.4800015.375.81000015.9761250016.565.11600017.165.6SPL26.185.9N0.764median 13.8median 69.6Delta1.810.531.830.82423.416.121.127.621.132.334.423.422.62217.32222.52137.117.949.113.350.515.254.413.252.611.554.212.262.712.368.513.372.914.57512.273.911.27411.773.612.172.412.773.613.678.313.179.113.671.213.168.313.672.713.671.113.5612586.30.665.8median 13.3median 71.11.29.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone SE 2022Google Pixel 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--电池小,但电池寿命长

消耗功率

Apple的电源管理在前些年被证明是非常成功的。虽然iPhone SE 2022在空闲运行时也显示出相当高的效率,但在满负荷情况下最多只有11瓦,它也能迅速耗尽其电池。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.9 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 6.5 / 11 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 mini
2226 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 III
4500 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Google Pixel 6
4614 mAh
Average Apple A15 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
14%
20%
43%
-12%
9%
-6%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.44
27%
0.62
-3%
0.44
27%
0.8
-33%
0.68
-13%
0.663 ?(0.51 - 1.1, n=6)
-11%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=206, last 2 years)
-53%
Idle Average *
0.9
1.56
-73%
1.18
-31%
0.65
28%
1.2
-33%
1
-11%
1.42 ?(0.9 - 2.2, n=6)
-58%
1.702 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=206, last 2 years)
-89%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.63
-9%
1.21
19%
0.69
54%
1.6
-7%
1.02
32%
1.93 ?(1.3 - 4.2, n=6)
-29%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=206, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Average *
6.5
2.32
64%
2.1
68%
2.99
54%
5.7
12%
5.39
17%
4.49 ?(2.65 - 6.7, n=6)
31%
4.47 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=206, last 2 years)
31%
Load Maximum *
11
4.12
63%
5.71
48%
5.42
51%
10.9
1%
9
18%
7.19 ?(3.56 - 11.4, n=6)
35%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=206, last 2 years)
33%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
: Ø5.05 (0.888-11.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.10.30.40.60.70.911.21.31.51.61.81.92.12.22.42.52.72.8Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.73 (2.41-2.98)
; Idle 1min: Ø0.932 (0.853-1.092)

电池寿命

iPhone SE 2022的电池只带来了2,018毫安时的容量。Android 设备,如 谷歌Pixel 6OnePlus Nord 2提供了两倍于此的容量。

然而,iPhone在功耗方面的优化总是令人印象深刻,在我们的WLAN测试中,新的iPhone SE也设法持续了12:49小时的体面时间。当然,它不能跟上一个 一加Nord 2,但电池寿命对于日常工作来说仍然是可以接受的,它可以轻松地处理一个完整的工作日而不需要充电。

当你最终需要一个插座时,由于电池小,它的充电速度也相当快,最大功率为20瓦:iPhone SE 2022的电池在大约一小时后就完全充满了,即使它完全耗尽了。只是你必须自己搞定一个充电器,因为Apple ,这款价格低廉的iPhone中也没有包含充电器。

根据Qi标准的无线充电也被再次支持。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 9min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 44min
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 mini
2226 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 III
4500 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Google Pixel 6
4614 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
19%
71%
32%
28%
Reader / Idle
2049
1938
-5%
1537
-25%
2272
11%
1926
-6%
2020
-1%
H.264
797
681
-15%
968
21%
1411
77%
1126
41%
1219
53%
WiFi v1.3
769
694
-10%
655
-15%
809
5%
958
25%
627
-18%
Load
164
143
-13%
316
93%
479
192%
272
66%
291
77%

Pros

+ 紧凑和高质量
+ 5G功能
+ 世界手机
+ 非常强大
+ 通过IP认证

Cons

- 只有60-Hz的显示屏
- 屏幕分辨率低
- 设计老化
- 不灵活的单镜头相机

结论 - 一个紧凑和闪电式的5G智能手机

测试iPhone SE 2022
测试iPhone SE 2022

Apple 仍然保持iPhone 8也与iPhone SE 2022一样,所以你继续不得不接受顶部和底部的宽边框。这可能是一个品味问题,你是否喜欢Home键,但它的操作包括指纹传感器再次完美无瑕地工作。

此外,iPhone SE 2022的功能非常强大,这要归功于它的 Apple A15,而且几乎不会有任何类似价格的智能手机能达到类似的性能。甚至一些目前更昂贵的iPhone,如 iPhone 11iPhone 12 mini在性能方面也被甩在了后面,相反,在这两款手机上,你可以得到明显更现代的设计和更灵活的相机系统。

价格低廉的iPhone SE带来了与最昂贵的Apple iPhone一样多的动力。它结构紧凑,现在还能支持5G。另一方面,在这一点上,设计已经相当老化。

iPhone SE终于也能支持5G了,这很好,同样,软件也应该会有很长一段时间的更新。然而,我们仍然希望Apple ,下次能给其最实惠的iPhone一个现代的外观,同时仍然保持其紧凑的尺寸。

那些不能适应设计的人可以在以下产品中找到更现代且仍然紧凑的替代品 iPhone 12 miniiPhone 13 mini.而那些正在寻找紧凑型智能手机的人,目前可能无法绕过iPhone,因为类似的小型Android ,只能从一些不知名的制造商那里找到。的 索尼Xperia 10 III可能是唯一比较知名的替代品,但它的性能明显较差。

价格和可用性

你可以直接从以下网站购买iPhone SE 2022 Apple,以及许多供应商,如 亚马逊百思买也提供这款智能手机。然而,作为典型的iPhone手机,你不应该指望在这一点上有一个更实惠的价格。

Apple iPhone SE 2022 - 04/11/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 69%
Weight
93%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 93%
Application Performance
91 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
64%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 314 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 233204 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple iPhone SE 2022智能手机评测--拥有5G和复古魅力的平价iPhone小矮人
Florian Schmitt, 2022-04-13 (Update: 2022-04-13)