Notebookcheck

Blackview AceBook 1笔记本电脑评论。适合低负荷使用,但其他方面不尽人意

不算是黑桃A。 AceBook 1以其低于400美元的价格吸引了很多人的眼球,但它也有一堆买家应该注意的注意事项。这款被动冷却的赛扬笔记本电脑只能让你走这么远,然后就会慢下来。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...
Laptop / Notebook Chinese Tech
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

一个月前刚刚发布的 就在一个月前,AceBook1是黑视的第一台Windows笔记本电脑,这意味着它的性能有很大的影响,有可能启动一系列不同的模型。该公司因其廉价的耐用Android 智能手机系列而闻名,如具有5G功能的BL5000模型。

14英寸的AceBook1笔记本电脑更为朴实,其低调的赛扬N4120处理器、4GB内存和微薄的128GB固态硬盘,在销售时将价格控制在500美元或400美元以下。这个领域的竞争者包括其他价格低廉的副笔记本,如 楚威CoreBook X,英菲尼克斯INBook X1 Pro, Honor MagicBook 14, 或泰可拉斯F7 Air.

更多关于Blackview的评论。

Blackview AceBook 1
Processor
Intel Celeron N4120 4 x 1.1 - 2.6 GHz, Gemini Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel UHD Graphics 600, DDR4, 27.20.100.9168
Memory
4096 MB 
, Crucial DDR4-2666, Single-Channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Panda 1402L01, IPS, Dell P/N:, VP088, Controller: NCP002B, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Storage
SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA, 128 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Gemini Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.8 x 325 x 214.8
Battery
45 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.3 kg, Power Supply: 134 g
Price
400 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
74 %
08/2021
Blackview AceBook 1
Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600
1.3 kg16.8 mm14.00"1920x1080
79 %
08/2021
Chuwi CoreBook X
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
1.5 kg20.6 mm14.00"2160x1440
80 %
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.5 kg16.3 mm14.00"1920x1080
85 %
05/2021
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg15.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
75 %
Teclast F7 Air
Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600
1.2 kg17 mm14.00"1920x1080
79 %
06/2020
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.6 kg19.9 mm14.00"1920x1080

案例

金属底座和盖子是AceBook 1的主要亮点。在视觉上,该系统看起来与流行的预算和中档超极本一样好,如 华硕VivoBook戴尔Inspiron,或惠普Pavilion ,这些产品的零售价往往更高。底座的刚性也比预期的要好;扭动底座或盖子会导致没有吱吱作响,只有轻微的翘起。

整体尺寸和重量非常接近Infinix INBook X1或Honor MagicBook 14。该系统有可能在长度上更小,因为其底部边框仍然相当厚。

很高兴在低端系统上看到更多的金属,而不仅仅是在昂贵的系统上。
很高兴在低端系统上看到更多的金属,而不仅仅是在昂贵的系统上。
稍微粗糙的金属表面可以很好地阻止指纹,但任何划痕都会更清楚地显示出来。
稍微粗糙的金属表面可以很好地阻止指纹,但任何划痕都会更清楚地显示出来。
铰链打开到最大角度(~140度)。
铰链打开到最大角度(~140度)。
铰链的硬度偏弱,特别是在较宽的角度下。
铰链的硬度偏弱,特别是在较宽的角度下。
在塑料铰链杆的下面有通风栅栏
在塑料铰链杆的下面有通风栅栏
底部面板只需用飞利浦螺丝刀就能轻松拆除
底部面板只需用飞利浦螺丝刀就能轻松拆除
327.1 mm 241 mm 19.9 mm 1.6 kg325 mm 214.8 mm 16.8 mm 1.3 kg323 mm 209 mm 17 mm 1.2 kg323.5 mm 219.5 mm 16.3 mm 1.5 kg322.5 mm 214.8 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg310 mm 229.5 mm 20.6 mm 1.5 kg

连接性

对于这样一台廉价的笔记本电脑来说,有很多的端口。USB-C和3个USB-A端口可能足以满足大多数家庭用户的需求。USB-C端口支持DisplayPort和Power Delivery,这意味着用户可以通过第三方USB-C适配器连接外部显示器和充电。

前面。没有端口
前面。没有端口
右边。微型SD读卡器、USB-A 2.0、USB-A 3.0、3.5毫米耳机
右边。微型SD读卡器、USB-A 2.0、USB-A 3.0、3.5毫米耳机
后方。没有端口
后方。没有端口
左边:AC适配器、USB-A 3.0、HDMI、USB-C w/ DisplayPort + Power Delivery
左边:AC适配器、USB-A 3.0、HDMI、USB-C w/ DisplayPort + Power Delivery

SD卡阅读器

从我们的UHS-II测试卡向桌面传输1GB的图片非常慢,超过50秒。此外,插入和弹出MicroSD卡可能很麻烦,因为卡是平放在边缘的。

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Chuwi CoreBook X
  (AV PRO V60)
25.5 MB/s ∼100% +25%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
  (AV Pro V60)
23.8 MB/s ∼93% +17%
Teclast F7 Air
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
23.2939 MB/s ∼91% +14%
Blackview AceBook 1
  (AV Pro V60)
20.4 MB/s ∼80%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.3 MB/s ∼76% -5%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.9 MB/s ∼100% +33%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
  (AV Pro V60)
27.4 MB/s ∼86% +15%
Chuwi CoreBook X
  (AV PRO V60)
26.82 MB/s ∼84% +12%
Teclast F7 Air
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
26.75 MB/s ∼84% +12%
Blackview AceBook 1
  (AV Pro V60)
23.9 MB/s ∼75%

沟通

无线网络很慢,但其他方面很稳定,可以进行可靠的浏览和视频流。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1352 (674min - 1509max) MBit/s ∼100% +651%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
973 (903min - 1083max) MBit/s ∼72% +441%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 (596min - 672max) MBit/s ∼48% +258%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
433 (230min - 462max) MBit/s ∼32% +141%
Teclast F7 Air
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
213 (184min - 230max) MBit/s ∼16% +18%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
180 (152min - 205max) MBit/s ∼13%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1191 (1067min - 1275max) MBit/s ∼100% +262%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
799 (392min - 1067max) MBit/s ∼67% +143%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
658 (627min - 678max) MBit/s ∼55% +100%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
607 (195min - 675max) MBit/s ∼51% +84%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
329 (259min - 351max) MBit/s ∼28%
Teclast F7 Air
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
240 (221min - 256max) MBit/s ∼20% -27%
050100150200250300350342331339338331347344331272259314324343342342343320299329299329330344337351345337342326346342331339338331347344331272259314324343342342343320299329299329330344337351345337342326346176180189158195185164180183152176205183187190176169182167180178184157181190175188197185176Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (259-351)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø180 (152-205)

网络摄像头

720p的网络摄像头很差,就像大多数其他笔记本电脑上一样。然而,AceBook 1的情况更糟糕,因为颜色看起来比正常情况下要暖和得多。没有网络摄像头快门,也没有与Windows Hello兼容。

ColorChecker
20.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
20 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Blackview AceBook 1: 19.72 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 29.87 ∆E

维护

用户可以维修M.2 2280 SSD或2个SODIMM插槽。WLAN模块在铜板下面,它可能是焊接的。

配件和保修

零售包装盒只包括文件和一个欧式交流适配器。标准的一年有限保修期适用,但买家必须支付运费。

输入设备

键盘

打字的体验是不合格的,因为按键很浅,反馈很弱。空格键和回车键比其他键更响亮、更硬,感觉不均匀。

触摸板

Precision 启用的点击板比XPS 13上的点击板要大。 XPS 13(12 x 6.8 cm vs. 11.2 x 6.5 cm),理论上应该更容易进行光标控制和多点触摸输入。不幸的是,情况并非如此,其略微粗糙的表面非常粘稠。用手指滑过应该感觉毫不费力,但在AceBook 1上几乎是累人的。屏幕上的光标甚至倾向于弹跳,使准确的点击变得令人沮丧。只要有可能,你就会想要一个外部鼠标。

键盘不包括背光。键盘上的字母和符号也可能随着时间的推移而擦掉。
键盘不包括背光。键盘上的字母和符号也可能随着时间的推移而擦掉。
键的行程较浅,反馈相对较弱
键的行程较浅,反馈相对较弱
点击板在按下时声音很大,很牢固。不幸的是,其粘性表面的牵引力使用起来令人沮丧。
点击板在按下时声音很大,很牢固。不幸的是,其粘性表面的牵引力使用起来令人沮丧。
欧式回车键和布局
欧式回车键和布局

显示

考虑到价格,14英寸的IPS显示屏还不错。虽然颜色很窄,但对比度很好,亮度也很好,足以满足舒适的室内使用。请注意,在25%及以下的亮度水平上会出现闪烁,这可能会导致少数用户的眼睛疲劳。

这款 Chuwi CoreBook X和Honor Magicbook 14都有更好、更准确的显示屏,但它们的零售价也更贵一些。

没有边缘到边缘的玻璃或触摸屏选项
没有边缘到边缘的玻璃或触摸屏选项
相对较窄的侧边框
相对较窄的侧边框
没有重大的背光不均匀出血问题
没有重大的背光不均匀出血问题
哑光面板只是略带颗粒感
哑光面板只是略带颗粒感
233
cd/m²
238.4
cd/m²
237.7
cd/m²
209.7
cd/m²
249.9
cd/m²
218.6
cd/m²
199.7
cd/m²
231.4
cd/m²
211.9
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Panda 1402L01
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 249.9 cd/m² Average: 225.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24.36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 249.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1470:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.72
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Blackview AceBook 1
Panda 1402L01, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Chuwi CoreBook X
Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14.00, 2160x1440
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
BOE NV140FHM-N62, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
BOE092E, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Teclast F7 Air
IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
LG Philips LP140WFA-SPD1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Display
60%
48%
55%
10%
-9%
Display P3 Coverage
41.6
67.2
62%
65.7
58%
64.77
56%
45.57
10%
37.76
-9%
sRGB Coverage
62.4
98
57%
86.6
39%
96.35
54%
68.66
10%
56.63
-9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43
68.8
60%
63.3
47%
66.14
54%
47.08
9%
39.05
-9%
Response Times
1613%
-22%
12%
127%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.8 (16, 14.8)
36.4 (18.4, 18)
-18%
43.2 (24.8, 18.4)
-40%
31.2 (14.8, 16.4)
-1%
32.4 (14.8, 17.6)
-5%
39 (21, 18)
-27%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 (13.2, 12.4)
26.4 (13.2, 13.2)
-3%
32 (19.6, 12.4)
-25%
19.2 (10.8, 8.4)
25%
28.4 (16, 12.4)
-11%
24 (14, 10)
6%
PWM Frequency
201.6 (25)
10000 (99)
4860%
200 (99)
-1%
1000 (99)
396%
Screen
-27%
-52%
15%
-83%
-54%
Brightness middle
249.9
355.3
42%
282
13%
341
36%
235.6
-6%
292
17%
Brightness
226
344
52%
271
20%
313
38%
234
4%
260
15%
Brightness Distribution
80
94
18%
74
-7%
87
9%
78
-2%
80
0%
Black Level *
0.17
0.34
-100%
0.24
-41%
0.27
-59%
0.46
-171%
0.36
-112%
Contrast
1470
1045
-29%
1175
-20%
1263
-14%
512
-65%
811
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.89
6.2
-59%
6.1
-57%
1.76
55%
9.43
-142%
6.92
-78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
16.39
10.96
33%
14.05
14%
4.85
70%
13.5
18%
19.36
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.72
1.23
28%
3.94
-129%
1.01
41%
3.82
-122%
5.13
-198%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
7.9
-229%
8.7
-263%
3.3
-38%
8.7
-263%
3.94
-64%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.02 109%
2.14 103%
2.26 97%
1.983 111%
2.83 78%
CCT
6772 96%
7450 87%
8672 75%
7233 90%
8137 80%
6737 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66
44
36
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
69
56
Total Average (Program / Settings)
549% / 318%
-9% / -26%
27% / 23%
18% / -23%
-25% / -38%

* ... smaller is better

色彩覆盖率仅限于sRGB的62%,这表明是一个预算面板。大多数价格较高的超极本覆盖95%以上的sRGB,颜色更深更准确。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

令我们惊讶的是,显示屏开箱后的校准效果不错,这对廉价笔记本电脑来说是不寻常的。平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别为2.4和3.89。蓝色似乎比其他颜色表现得更不准确。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 201.6 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15345 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

如果在户外工作,预计会出现眩光和洗出的颜色。即使在阴凉处,显示屏的亮度也不足以减轻环境光线的不利影响。

在一个明亮的阴天,在户外
在一个明亮的阴天,在户外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
在一个明亮的阴天,在户外
在一个明亮的阴天,在户外
宽广的IPS可视角度。在极端角度下,颜色和对比度会下降
宽广的IPS可视角度。在极端角度下,颜色和对比度会下降

业绩

ǞǞǞ 赛扬N4120是一种被动冷却的处理器,通常出现在非常便宜的笔记本电脑上,包括那些不太知名的制造商,如Chuwi。它的排名远远低于酷睿i3笔记本电脑,仅略高于Atom系列,只适合于要求不高的浏览或文字处理任务,是一个合格的解决方案。

处理器

原始的CPU性能与Core m3-6Y30在五年前的 MacBook 12.即使是入门级的第十代 酷睿i3-1005G1在大多数情况下,可以运行至少快两倍。这毕竟是一台被动冷却的机器。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225233.66226.86227.97227.63227.97227.18227.63226.66227.49226.86227.55227.35226.9227.65227.13227.31228.71228.4227.59228.46228.67228.01228.4227.65226.52226.28225.47226.92226.78228.05227.71228.52228.65226.82229.22229.18229.1229.41228.62228.83227.63227.39229.05228.97229.38228.83227.87228.65228.18226.44170.9132.88129.15128.5125.47124.02124.12125.04123.47123.94123.16122.55123.16122.83121.49123.05122.52118.71117.75122.03122.29122.15123.2123.73123.18121.21122.32124226.02226.44227.45227.12226.7228.67227.88229.36229.2228.83229.2228.89227.94229.55228.85228.69228.71228.24228.71229.06228.07229.44228.91229.16227.89228.87228.63227.95228.89228.96211.45208.81209.07209.2209.44208.49209.18209.66208208.71209.06208.88209.13209.15208.81208.55209.34208.66208.5209.32208.45208.96209.6208.08208.52233.66226.86227.97227.63227.97227.18227.63226.66227.49226.86227.55227.35226.9227.65227.13227.31228.71228.4227.59228.46228.67228.01228.4227.65226.52226.28225.47226.92226.78228.05227.71228.52228.65226.82229.22229.18229.1229.41228.62228.83227.63227.39229.05228.97229.38228.83227.87228.65228.18226.44170.9132.88129.15128.5125.47124.02124.12125.04123.47123.94123.16122.55123.16122.83121.49123.05122.52118.71117.75122.03122.29122.15123.2123.73123.18121.21122.32124226.02226.44227.45227.12226.7228.67227.88229.36229.2228.83229.2228.89227.94229.55228.85228.69228.71228.24228.71229.06228.07229.44228.91229.16227.89228.87228.63227.95228.89228.96211.45208.81209.07209.2209.44208.49209.18209.66208208.71209.06208.88209.13209.15208.81208.55209.34208.66208.5209.32208.45208.96209.6208.08208.52233.66226.86227.97227.63227.97227.18227.63226.66227.49226.86227.55227.35226.9227.65227.13227.31228.71228.4227.59228.46228.67228.01228.4227.65226.52226.28225.47226.92226.78228.05227.71228.52228.65226.82229.22229.18229.1229.41228.62228.83227.63227.39229.05228.97229.38228.83227.87228.65228.18226.44170.9132.88129.15128.5125.47124.02124.12125.04123.47123.94123.16122.55123.16122.83121.49123.05122.52118.71117.75122.03122.29122.15123.2123.73123.18121.21122.32124226.02226.44227.45227.12226.7228.67227.88229.36229.2228.83229.2228.89227.94229.55228.85228.69228.71228.24228.71229.06228.07229.44228.91229.16227.89228.87228.63227.95228.89228.96211.45208.81209.07209.2209.44208.49209.18209.66208208.71209.06208.88209.13209.15208.81208.55209.34208.66208.5209.32208.45208.96209.6208.08208.52Tooltip
Blackview AceBook 1 Intel Celeron N4120; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø228 (225.47-233.66)
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA Intel Celeron N4500; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø125 (117.75-170.9)
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø228 (226.02-229.55)
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø209 (208-211.45)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
888 (762.33min - 887.51max) Points ∼100% +279%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
663 (525.18min - 663.12max) Points ∼75% +183%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
575 (559.33min - 575.29max) Points ∼65% +146%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
404 Points ∼45% +73%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
234 (225.47min - 233.66max) Points ∼26%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (223 - 234, n=3)
227 Points ∼26% -3%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
223 Points ∼25% -5%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points ∼25% -7%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
211 (208min - 211.45max) Points ∼24% -10%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
171 (60.18min - 170.9max) Points ∼19% -27%
HP mt21
Intel Celeron 3865U
142 Points ∼16% -39%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
90 (89.56min - 90.33max) Points ∼10% -62%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel Celeron N3060
72 Points ∼8% -69%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
227 Points ∼100% +205%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
182 Points ∼80% +144%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
157 Points ∼69% +111%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
132 Points ∼58% +77%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points ∼40% +22%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points ∼40% +21%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
82 Points ∼36% +10%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
74.5 Points ∼33%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (73 - 74.5, n=3)
73.6 Points ∼32% -1%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
73 Points ∼32% -2%
HP mt21
Intel Celeron 3865U
72 Points ∼32% -3%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
68.4 Points ∼30% -8%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
47.6 Points ∼21% -36%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel Celeron N3060
36 Points ∼16% -52%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2242 Points ∼100% +496%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1640 Points ∼73% +336%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
1385 Points ∼62% +268%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
902 Points ∼40% +140%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
516 Points ∼23% +37%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (376 - 516, n=3)
461 Points ∼21% +23%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
451 Points ∼20% +20%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
376 Points ∼17%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
332 Points ∼15% -12%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
200 Points ∼9% -47%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
577 Points ∼100% +263%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
463 Points ∼80% +191%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
386 Points ∼67% +143%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
338 Points ∼59% +113%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
188 Points ∼33% +18%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
165 Points ∼29% +4%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (159 - 166, n=3)
163 Points ∼28% +3%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
159 Points ∼28%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
152 Points ∼26% -4%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
106 Points ∼18% -33%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4281 (3308.99min - 4281.37max) Points ∼100% +344%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
3592 (3539.75min - 3591.79max) Points ∼84% +272%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
1230 Points ∼29% +27%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (965 - 1253, n=3)
1149 Points ∼27% +19%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
965 (915.042min - 964.764max) Points ∼23%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
709 Points ∼17% -27%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1212 Points ∼100% +196%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
991 Points ∼82% +142%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
452 Points ∼37% +11%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
424 Points ∼35% +4%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (409 - 424, n=2)
417 Points ∼34% +2%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
409 Points ∼34%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
5811 Seconds * ∼100% -125%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
4249 Seconds * ∼73% -64%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
2801 Seconds * ∼48% -8%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
2583 Seconds * ∼44%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (2558 - 2583, n=2)
2571 Seconds * ∼44% -0%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
2558 Seconds * ∼44% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1122.9 Seconds * ∼19% +57%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
766 Seconds * ∼13% +70%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
710 Seconds * ∼12% +73%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
528 Seconds * ∼9% +80%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5382 MIPS ∼100% +123%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4389 MIPS ∼82% +82%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
4057 MIPS ∼75% +68%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
4022 MIPS ∼75% +67%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
2853 MIPS ∼53% +18%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
2412 MIPS ∼45%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (2145 - 2412, n=3)
2279 MIPS ∼42% -6%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
2155 MIPS ∼40% -11%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
2145 MIPS ∼40% -11%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
1825 MIPS ∼34% -24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25506 MIPS ∼100% +243%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
20740 MIPS ∼81% +179%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
17799 MIPS ∼70% +139%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
11135 MIPS ∼44% +50%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
7436 MIPS ∼29%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
6873 MIPS ∼27% -8%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (5832 - 7436, n=3)
6817 MIPS ∼27% -8%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
5832 MIPS ∼23% -22%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
5394 MIPS ∼21% -27%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
3541 MIPS ∼14% -52%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1573 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1161 Points ∼74%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
882 Points ∼56%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (438 - 439, n=2)
439 Points ∼28%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
438 Points ∼28%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
404 Points ∼26%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
401 Points ∼25%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5089 Points ∼100%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
3323 Points ∼65%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2434 Points ∼48%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
1509 Points ∼30%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (1505 - 1509, n=2)
1507 Points ∼30%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
1407 Points ∼28%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
707 Points ∼14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
7.06 fps ∼100% +592%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
5.6 fps ∼79% +449%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
4.81 fps ∼68% +372%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
3.59 fps ∼51% +252%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
1.38 fps ∼20% +35%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
1.24 fps ∼18% +22%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (1.02 - 1.38, n=3)
1.237 fps ∼18% +21%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
1.02 fps ∼14%
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
0.74 fps ∼10% -27%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel Celeron J3355
0.7 fps ∼10% -31%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
175 s * ∼100% -11%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
157 s * ∼90%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
155 s * ∼89% +1%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (131 - 157, n=3)
141 s * ∼81% +10%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
136 s * ∼78% +13%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
76 s * ∼43% +52%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
57 s * ∼33% +64%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
56.83 s * ∼32% +64%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
47.4 s * ∼27% +70%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA
Intel Celeron N4500
2.12 sec * ∼100% -29%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Intel Celeron N4100
1.756 sec * ∼83% -6%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel Celeron N4120
1.649 sec * ∼78%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel Celeron N4120
1.645 sec * ∼78% -0%
Average Intel Celeron N4120
  (1.642 - 1.649, n=3)
1.645 sec * ∼78% -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel Core i3-1005G1
0.755 sec * ∼36% +54%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
0.746 sec * ∼35% +55%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Core i7-1065G7
0.671 sec * ∼32% +59%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.552 sec * ∼26% +67%
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
234 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
16.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
74.5 Points
Help

系统性能

PCMark的结果甚至落后于最慢的上一代Core i3笔记本电脑,如联想V17.这种差异足够大,以至于在浏览Windows或在应用程序之间进行多任务处理时有明显的延迟。

PCMark 10 / Score
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5036 Points ∼100% +201%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13
4451 Points ∼88% +166%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4062 Points ∼81% +143%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
3446 Points ∼68% +106%
HP mt21
HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
1970 Points ∼39% +18%
Teclast F7 Air
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, faspeed K7N8-256G
1801 Points ∼36% +8%
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (1671 - 1801, n=2)
1736 Points ∼34% +4%
Blackview AceBook 1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA
1671 Points ∼33%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9985 Points ∼100% +117%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13
9254 Points ∼93% +101%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7920 Points ∼79% +72%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
7666 Points ∼77% +67%
Teclast F7 Air
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, faspeed K7N8-256G
5005 Points ∼50% +9%
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (4599 - 5005, n=2)
4802 Points ∼48% +4%
HP mt21
HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4648 Points ∼47% +1%
Blackview AceBook 1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA
4599 Points ∼46%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6802 Points ∼100% +140%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6400 Points ∼94% +126%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13
6005 Points ∼88% +112%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
5384 Points ∼79% +90%
HP mt21
HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3558 Points ∼52% +26%
Blackview AceBook 1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA
2833 Points ∼42%
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (2813 - 2833, n=2)
2823 Points ∼42% 0%
Teclast F7 Air
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, faspeed K7N8-256G
2813 Points ∼41% -1%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5103 Points ∼100% +424%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13
4307 Points ∼84% +343%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
3590 Points ∼70% +269%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
2692 Points ∼53% +177%
HP mt21
HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
1256 Points ∼25% +29%
Teclast F7 Air
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, faspeed K7N8-256G
1126 Points ∼22% +16%
Average Intel Celeron N4120, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (973 - 1126, n=2)
1050 Points ∼21% +8%
Blackview AceBook 1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA
973 Points ∼19%
PCMark 10 Score
1671 points
Help

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC延迟问题。此外,在60 FPS下的4K视频播放并不完美,因为我们在长达一分钟的视频中能够记录到26个丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Teclast F7 Air
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, faspeed K7N8-256G
3412.8 μs * ∼100% -96%
Blackview AceBook 1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA
1742.7 μs * ∼51%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
902.6 μs * ∼26% +48%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13
692.1 μs * ∼20% +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
674.1 μs * ∼20% +61%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
591.6 μs * ∼17% +66%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试装置配备了不常见的SCY C500 M.2 SATA III 2280固态硬盘,因为该系统不支持PCIe 3或NVMe驱动器。连续读取和写入率在同类产品中是不错的,分别为550MB/s和430MB/s左右。然而,用户可能会很快达到128GB的容量。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
只有一个内部M.2 SATA III 2280插槽
只有一个内部M.2 SATA III 2280插槽
Blackview AceBook 1
SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA
Chuwi CoreBook X
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Teclast F7 Air
faspeed K7N8-256G
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
AS SSD
262%
322%
591%
24%
177%
Seq Read
446.59
1392.62
212%
2134.73
378%
3021.48
577%
430.22
-4%
1535.04
244%
Seq Write
276.8
954.07
245%
1775.89
542%
2340.84
746%
412.29
49%
1215.35
339%
4K Read
8.95
39.51
341%
28.88
223%
47.9
435%
13.21
48%
35.93
301%
4K Write
50.19
98.87
97%
147.91
195%
186.68
272%
50.06
0%
138.31
176%
4K-64 Read
145.04
834.37
475%
711.5
391%
1472.21
915%
122.88
-15%
467.74
222%
4K-64 Write
173.46
686.92
296%
642.5
270%
1828.64
954%
215.55
24%
399.57
130%
Access Time Read *
0.5
0.066
87%
0.052
90%
0.06
88%
0.151
70%
0.104
79%
Access Time Write *
0.232
0.044
81%
0.092
60%
0.021
91%
0.17
27%
0.029
87%
Score Read
199
1013
409%
954
379%
1822
816%
179
-10%
657
230%
Score Write
251
881
251%
968
286%
2249
796%
307
22%
659
163%
Score Total
545
2399
340%
2395
339%
4973
812%
581
7%
1647
202%
Copy ISO MB/s
360.87
982.66
172%
1295.62
259%
440.82
22%
753.9
109%
Copy Program MB/s
115.06
643.48
459%
899.51
682%
193.42
68%
253.05
120%
Copy Game MB/s
306.81
920.07
200%
1587.84
418%
396.77
29%
546.02
78%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
172%
338%
471%
5%
226%
Write 4K
66.32
130.5
97%
228.3
244%
223.7
237%
74.98
13%
173.1
161%
Read 4K
26.3
38.72
47%
60.68
131%
51.17
95%
27.31
4%
49.32
88%
Write Seq
231.9
709.1
206%
1895
717%
2579
1012%
1188
412%
Read Seq
466.8
717.1
54%
1573
237%
2553
447%
1278
174%
Write 4K Q32T1
117.3
509.5
334%
476.6
306%
671.3
472%
120.1
2%
457.4
290%
Read 4K Q32T1
138.1
554.1
301%
592.1
329%
760.7
451%
135.2
-2%
505.2
266%
Write Seq Q32T1
427.6
1037
143%
2136
400%
2721
536%
469.2
10%
1258
194%
Read Seq Q32T1
546.3
1609
195%
2413
342%
3358
515%
555.3
2%
1742
219%
Write 4K Q8T8
264.6
Read 4K Q8T8
135.6
Total Average (Program / Settings)
217% / 229%
330% / 328%
531% / 540%
15% / 18%
202% / 195%

* ... smaller is better

SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 546.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 427.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 138.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 117.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 466.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 231.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 26.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 66.32 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450475417.55459.82460.45460.87461.5465.89473.01474.27475.31475.73478.66483.18484.52485.36485.57486.82486.82491.78498.13498.54498.75498.75498.96498.96498.96498.96498.96498.96499.17499.17499.17499.38499.38499.38499.38499.38499.38499.38499.38499.38499.59499.59499.59499.59499.59499.59499.59499.8499.8499.8Tooltip
: Ø490 (417.55-499.8)

GPU性能

的。 UHD Graphics 600的速度比已经很慢的 UHD Graphics 620.这更像是一台浏览和1080p流媒体机器,而不是一台本地游戏机。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
6194 Points ∼100% +962%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4132 Points ∼67% +609%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
2632 Points ∼42% +351%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
1963 Points ∼32% +237%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U
1959 Points ∼32% +236%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1186 Points ∼19% +103%
HP mt21
Intel HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U
808 Points ∼13% +39%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120
583 Points ∼9%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (410 - 638, n=23)
550 Points ∼9% -6%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
381 Points ∼6% -35%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
4367 Points ∼100% +670%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
3544 Points ∼81% +525%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
2154 Points ∼49% +280%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U
2139 Points ∼49% +277%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
1992 Points ∼46% +251%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1014 Points ∼23% +79%
HP mt21
Intel HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U
819 Points ∼19% +44%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120
567 Points ∼13%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (362 - 791, n=23)
541 Points ∼12% -5%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
395 Points ∼9% -30%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
24425 Points ∼100% +610%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
17778 Points ∼73% +417%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
13722 Points ∼56% +299%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U
11437 Points ∼47% +232%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
10336 Points ∼42% +200%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
6078 Points ∼25% +77%
HP mt21
Intel HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U
4712 Points ∼19% +37%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120
3781 Points ∼15% +10%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120
3441 Points ∼14%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (2714 - 3932, n=16)
3411 Points ∼14% -1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
3988 Points ∼100% +815%
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
2586 Points ∼65% +493%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
1667 Points ∼42% +282%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U
1444 Points ∼36% +231%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
1359 Points ∼34% +212%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
735 Points ∼18% +69%
HP mt21
Intel HD Graphics 610, Celeron 3865U
556 Points ∼14% +28%
Teclast F7 Air
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120
466 Points ∼12% +7%
Blackview AceBook 1
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120
436 Points ∼11%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (315 - 486, n=17)
421 Points ∼11% -3%
XIDU PhilBook Max
Intel HD Graphics 500, Celeron J3355
311 Points ∼8% -29%
3DMark 11 Performance
658 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3128 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
404 points
Help
low med. high ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 37.4 15.3 7.9 7.2 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 6.35 4.18 3.79 fps

Emissions

系统噪音

虽然从技术上讲,由于无风扇设计,我们的设备在运行3DMark 06或Prime95等高负荷时,有时会出现明显的线圈啸叫或电子噪音。这也会在视频流时发生,但程度不明显。非常响亮的线圈啸叫可能表明内部元件更便宜。

在CPU上安装铜板,没有风扇
在CPU上安装铜板,没有风扇
可访问的2个SODIMM插槽
可访问的2个SODIMM插槽

温度

无论屏幕上的负载如何,表面温度都不会过高。我们能够在键盘中心记录到最高35摄氏度的温度,而竞争者的键盘中心为42摄氏度至50摄氏度。 英菲尼克斯INBook X1 Pro.

Max. Load
 29.2 °C35.8 °C30.8 °C 
 27.4 °C33.4 °C28.2 °C 
 25.6 °C24.6 °C25 °C 
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 28.9 °C
30.8 °C33.6 °C33.2 °C
29.6 °C31.8 °C31.8 °C
28.4 °C29.2 °C29.4 °C
Maximum: 33.6 °C
Average: 30.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 58.4 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (+2.8 °C / 5 F).
系统空闲(顶部
系统空闲(顶部
系统闲置(底部
系统闲置(底部
Prime95压力(顶部
Prime95压力(顶部
Prime95应力(底部)。
Prime95应力(底部)。

压力测试

当运行Prime95时,CPU会在最初的10秒左右提升到2.3GHz,直到核心温度达到80℃。此后,CPU会下降并稳定在2GHz和82℃。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Prime95压力
Prime95压力
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲 -- -- 40
Prime95压力 2.0 -- 82

发言人

集成的扬声器就其尺寸而言是比较响亮的,但质量是尖锐的。我们的麦克风显示了一个狭窄的粉红噪声曲线,代表低音再现不佳和范围狭窄。因此,这些扬声器更适合用于虚拟会议而不是多媒体播放。

靠近前角的向下发射的立体声扬声器
靠近前角的向下发射的立体声扬声器
最大音量下的粉红噪音
最大音量下的粉红噪音
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203235.6322524.528.224.53121.621.221.64022.223.122.25020.722.720.76321.624.921.68022.422.722.41002020.92012518.118.218.116019.81619.820021.315.721.325025.914.125.931531.415.531.440040.314.140.350045.512.845.563049.811.949.880055.611.955.6100059.411.159.4125059.711.459.7160057.211.257.2200059.311.559.3250060.711.660.7315061.911.661.9400067.312.267.3500074.112.374.1630070.312.170.3800067.112.367.11000064.812.664.81250059.613.959.61600048.516.148.5SPL78.224.378.2N34.10.634.1median 57.2median 12.3median 57.2Delta12.9212.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview AceBook 1Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Blackview AceBook 1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Energy Management

消耗功率

在运行高负荷时,该系统将从小型(约7.3 x 4.3 x 3.2厘米)交流适配器中最多消耗20瓦,而搭载Core ix的笔记本电脑则是这一数值的两倍多。在更典型的工作负载下,用户可以期待个位数的瓦特。低消耗率是以下记录的长电池寿命的原因。

运行3DMark 06时的持续耗电
运行3DMark 06时的持续耗电
Prime95在10秒处启动。消耗量在大约10秒内会跳到19.5瓦,然后下降并稳定在15.7瓦。
Prime95在10秒处启动。消耗量在大约10秒内会跳到19.5瓦,然后下降并稳定在15.7瓦。
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.6 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.5 / 5.6 / 6.2 Watt
Load midlight 8.3 / 19.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Blackview AceBook 1
Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Chuwi CoreBook X
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14.00
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Teclast F7 Air
Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, faspeed K7N8-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Power Consumption
-152%
-186%
-128%
-78%
-87%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
6.2
-77%
5
-43%
4
-14%
6.7
-91%
3.2
9%
Idle Average *
5.6
10.7
-91%
11.5
-105%
6
-7%
9.6
-71%
6.2
-11%
Idle Maximum *
6.2
12.5
-102%
12
-94%
10
-61%
9.9
-60%
7.2
-16%
Load Average *
8.3
40.5
-388%
48.7
-487%
34
-310%
19.1
-130%
30
-261%
Load Maximum *
19.6
39.2
-100%
58.8
-200%
68
-247%
27.1
-38%
50
-155%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.4
46.4

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Prime95

01234567891011121314151617181919.519.519.519.519.419.419.419.419.419.419.419.419.419.419.319.318.819.419.419.419.31919.316.416.115.816.216.216.216.216.316.216.216.216.316.216.216.216.216.216.216.116.216.216.216.216.216.116.216.116.216.216.116.11616.216.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.216.116.116.116.116.216.114.916.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.11616.21615.515.51616.11616.11616161616161616161616.1161616161616.116161616161615.915.615.815.915.915.815.815.815.815.915.815.815.815.815.915.815.815.815.815.715.815.815.715.715.815.715.715.815.715.815.715.715.815.715.715.715.715.715.815.715.815.815.715.715.715.715.715.715.715.815.815.715.715.715.715.715.715.715.715.715.815.7Tooltip
: Ø16.4 (14.9-19.5)

电池寿命

运行时间很长,9.5小时的实际WLAN使用时间可以与Honor MagicBook 14相媲美。然而,充电非常慢,从空电到满电需要4个小时。

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 25min
Blackview AceBook 1
Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, 45 Wh
Chuwi CoreBook X
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 46.2 Wh
Infinix INBook X1 Pro
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 55 Wh
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
Teclast F7 Air
Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, 32.725 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 35 Wh
Battery Runtime
-29%
-10%
3%
-54%
-36%
Reader / Idle
WiFi v1.3
565
400
-29%
508
-10%
580
3%
262
-54%
359
-36%
Load
107

Pros

+ 吸引人的轻质金属机箱,价格便宜
+ 可获得M.2 2280 SSD和2个SODIMM
+ 可以通过桶装或USB-C充电
+ 电池寿命长
+ 无风扇噪音

Cons

- 在60FPS下播放4K视频并不完美
- 点击板粘性大,跳跃性强
- 128GB固态硬盘容量低
- 充电速度非常慢
- 明显的线圈啸叫

判决书

在审查中。Blackview AceBook 1.测试单位由黑视提供
在审查中。Blackview AceBook 1.测试单位由黑视提供

对一台400美元以下的笔记本电脑期望太高是不现实的。然而,最起码,这类机型应该能够顺利地运行Windows 10和所有常见的应用程序。这里的赛扬N4120甚至难以跟上浏览器和视频之间的轻度多任务处理,整体速度缓慢,有时令人沮丧的用户体验。

缓慢的系统性能和粘稠的点击板使这台无害的、构造合理的副笔记本大打折扣。

AceBook 1的几个方面也需要一些更新。特别是粘稠的点击板和响亮的线圈啸叫,对于寻求安静和舒适的副笔记本的用户来说,可能会成为交易的障碍。

长的电池寿命,广泛的端口选择,以及有吸引力的金属骨架,都是Blackview有史以来第一台笔记本电脑的良好起点,但在我们推荐AceBook 1超过更成熟的预算模型之前,还有很多事情需要做,例如 笔记本 X, 笔记本X1, 魔法书14, 或 IdeaPad 14.

价格和可用性

Blackview现在正在销售淘宝网直接销售AceBook 1,售价为499美元,打折时为389美元。

Blackview AceBook 1 - 08/12/2021 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
71 / 98 → 72%
Keyboard
64%
Pointing Device
54%
Connectivity
49 / 75 → 66%
Weight
71 / 20-75 → 93%
Battery
88%
Display
81%
Games Performance
19 / 78 → 25%
Application Performance
65 / 85 → 76%
Temperature
95%
Noise
80%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Average
64%
74%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 4640 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011
contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18063 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Blackview AceBook 1笔记本电脑评论。适合低负荷使用,但其他方面不尽人意
Allen Ngo, 2021-08-18 (Update: 2021-08-18)