Notebookcheck Logo

Apple MacBook Pro 13 (2016年末, 2.9 GHz i5, Touch Bar) 笔记本电脑简短评测

更好的13寸Pro? MacBook Pro 13 Touch Bar是Apple的最新13寸旗舰机型。除了键盘上方最引人侧目的OLED功能条,它相比搭配传统功能键的入门机型也有一些其他区别。它是否值得高出300美元(约2066人民币)的价差呢?
Apple MacBook Laptop / Notebook Skylake
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6267U 2 x 2.9 - 3.3 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Core: 1000 MHz, Memory: 1067 MHz, 4542
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR3-2133
Display
13.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 227 PPI, APPA033, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Apple SSD AP0256, 256 GB 
Soundcard
Cirrus Logic CS8409
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 4 Thunderbolt, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15 x 304 x 212
Battery
49.2 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Apple macOS 10.12 Sierra
Camera
Webcam: 720p FaceTime 高清摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式 (Butterfly v2), Keyboard Light: yes, 61瓦 USB-C 电源适配器, USB-C 数据线 (2米), 12 Months Warranty
Released
11/25/2016
Weight
1.358 kg, Power Supply: 269 g
Price
1999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

349 mm 241 mm 16 mm 1.8 kg333 mm 229 mm 16.5 mm 1.2 kg325 mm 227 mm 17 mm 1.4 kg314 mm 219 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg304 mm 212 mm 15 mm 1.4 kg304 mm 201 mm 15 mm 1.3 kg280.5 mm 196.5 mm 13.1 mm 920 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (Klaus I211)
949 MBit/s 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
949 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (Klaus I211)
653 MBit/s -31%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
587 MBit/s -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
534 MBit/s -44%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
950 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (Klaus I211)
948 MBit/s 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (Klaus I211)
682 MBit/s -28%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
674 MBit/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
637 MBit/s -33%
541
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
APPA033 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 569 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 542.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 569 cd/m²
Contrast: 1016:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
78.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
APPA033, , 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
APPA02A, , 2560x1600, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
VVX14T058J00, , 2560x1440, 14.00
Display
-1%
-20%
-25%
-20%
Display P3 Coverage
99.2
97.1
-2%
65.9
-34%
62.8
-37%
66.7
-33%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
99.8
0%
97
-3%
89.4
-11%
94.7
-5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.6
86.7
-1%
67.4
-23%
64.6
-26%
68.4
-22%
Response Times
2%
27%
31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 ?(19.6, 27.6)
47.2 ?(21.6, 25.6)
-0%
43.6 ?(13.6, 30)
8%
44 ?(17, 27)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
53 ?(10, 43)
51.6 ?(8.4, 43.2)
3%
29.2 ?(9.2, 20)
45%
24 ?(5.2, 18.8)
55%
PWM Frequency
220 ?(90)
Screen
-2%
-12%
-48%
-39%
Brightness middle
569
600
5%
361
-37%
396.2
-30%
272
-52%
Brightness
542
564
4%
342
-37%
357
-34%
268
-51%
Brightness Distribution
90
89
-1%
81
-10%
84
-7%
95
6%
Black Level *
0.56
0.57
-2%
0.361
36%
0.266
52%
0.32
43%
Contrast
1016
1053
4%
1000
-2%
1489
47%
850
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.5
-7%
1.82
-30%
3.9
-179%
2.61
-86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
2.9
-0%
3.26
-12%
7.58
-161%
6.43
-122%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
2
-11%
1.8
-0%
4.16
-131%
3.31
-84%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.27 97%
2.49 88%
2.31 95%
2.35 94%
CCT
6877 95%
6855 95%
6417 101%
6514 100%
6360 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
78.4
77
-2%
61.9
-21%
57.5
-27%
63
-20%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.3
92
-7%
96.9
-2%
88.7
-11%
95
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-0% / -1%
-16% / -13%
-15% / -33%
-9% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z Idle
GPU-Z Idle
GPU-Z Load
GPU-Z Load
LatencyMon Idle
LatencyMon Idle
LatencyMon Web browsing
LatencyMon Web browsing
Intel XTU
Intel XTU
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points +8%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points +6%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U
138 Points +5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel Core i7-7500U
137 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
131 Points
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
128 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Intel Core i5-5257U
126 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
126 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
124 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
666 Points +96%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-7500U
348 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
347 Points +2%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U
339 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
339 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel Core i7-7500U
334 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
327 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Intel Core i5-5257U
321 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
310 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
309 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
309 Points -9%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
339 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
131 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
36.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.3 %
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256
3738 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
3637 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
3542 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3385 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Apple SSD SM0128G
3363 Points -10%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3362 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3280 Points -12%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
2855 Points -24%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
4442 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4426 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4342 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256
4218 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4176 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Apple SSD SM0128G
4105 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3853 Points -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3738 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4218 points
Help
Apple SSD AP0256
Sequential Read: 1662 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1336 MB/s
512K Read: 1183 MB/s
512K Write: 1481 MB/s
4K Read: 16.1 MB/s
4K Write: 23.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 657 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 419 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4502 Points +67%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
2696 Points
Sony Vaio Z Flip
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i7-6567U
2646 Points -2%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
2524 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i5-6360U
2401 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2321 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2221 Points -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1782 Points -34%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Intel Core i5-5257U
1706 Points -37%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1631 Points -40%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1610 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1386 Points -49%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
21533 Points +63%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
13172 Points
Sony Vaio Z Flip
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i7-6567U
12986 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
12812 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i5-6360U
11123 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
8885 Points -33%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8552 Points -35%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
8519 Points -35%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
8289 Points -37%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7896 Points -40%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Intel Core i5-5257U
7894 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7516 Points -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3252 Points +96%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1657 Points
Sony Vaio Z Flip
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i7-6567U
1638 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1589 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1553 Points -6%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1520 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i5-6360U
1448 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1025 Points -38%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Intel Core i5-5257U
1020 Points -38%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
991 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
959 Points -42%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
941 Points -43%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
15951 points
3DMark 11 Performance
2881 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8105 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1550 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
620 points
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
24 fps +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
21.6 (16min - 29max) fps
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U, Intel Iris Graphics 540
20.5 (13min - 27max) fps -5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel Core i7-7500U, Intel HD Graphics 620
15.7 (11min - 22max) fps -27%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-7500U, Intel HD Graphics 620
13.92 fps -36%
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
47.9 fps
Sony Vaio Z Flip
Intel Core i7-6567U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
43.4 fps -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U, Intel Iris Graphics 540
40.3 fps -16%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
39.4 (13.3min - 143.1max) fps -18%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel Core i7-7500U, Intel HD Graphics 620
26.1 fps -46%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Intel Core i5-5257U, Intel Iris Graphics 6100
23.3 fps -51%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
27.3 (24min - 30max) fps
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U, Intel Iris Graphics 540
24.9 (23min - 27max) fps -9%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Intel Core i7-7500U, Intel HD Graphics 620
21.8 fps -20%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-7500U, Intel HD Graphics 620
20.2 fps -26%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1280x720 Low Preset AF:1x
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
26 (19min - 35max) fps
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U, Intel Iris Graphics 540
20.5 (3min - 30max) fps -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U, Intel Iris Graphics 540
16.7 (13min - 23max) fps -36%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 103 56.2 47.9 13.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 21.6 14.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 40.3 33.6
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 52.9 32.3 19 14.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 27.3 21.9
Far Cry Primal (2016) 27 14
Overwatch (2016) 86 58.8 26.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 26
Battlefield 1 (2016) 49.6 29.8 15.1
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 93 34.7 20.8
Titanfall 2 (2016) 65 45.2 17.7
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 23.4 19.9

Noise Level

Idle
30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB(A)
Load
33 / 36.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
Max. Load
 42 °C45 °C37 °C 
 38 °C42 °C35 °C 
 28 °C29 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 36 °C
38 °C39 °C38 °C
37 °C39 °C36 °C
30 °C32 °C31 °C
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203735.12532.532.43131.832.34034.336.45032.339.66330.244.98027.745.210026.550.212524.759.516024.252.720023.363.925022.464.631521.662.640020.97150019.572.763019.178.980018.676.610001878.9125017.875160017.477.1200017.276.8250017.276.5315017.372.1400017.472.7500017.273.6630017.269.5800017.368.11000017.364.61250017.362.21600017.363.5SPL30.186.9N1.472.4median 17.8median 72.1Delta1.86.545.140.533.833.233.232.735.136.73232.234.433.236.333.148.830.159.828.2512661.824.565.123.368.221.966.721.366.919.875.719.371.418.972.718.275.617.671.517.373.217.370.717.468.617.269.51766.717.167.217.36717.367.117.466.617.367.717.283.230.459.51.5median 67.2median 17.63.72.736.134.531.132.832.631.437.534.537.335.24730.447.928.75728.564.525.556.524.667.824.469.224.366.922.977.522.875.821.374.820.36719.671.519.377.918.579.418.473.117.873.718.170.317.470.817.470.517.67417.56717.667.317.561.117.565.117.586.130.971.41.5median 70.5median 18.53.72.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 0.51 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.1 / 7.6 / 8.2 Watt
Load midlight 56.4 / 59.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
6360U, Iris Graphics 540, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
5257U, Iris Graphics 6100, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03
5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 1440x900, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 3200x1800, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
6600U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440, 14.00
Power Consumption
-3%
-7%
21%
-16%
1%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
2.1
3
-43%
2.8
-33%
2.7
-29%
6.4
-205%
3.8
-81%
3.8
-81%
Idle Average *
7.6
8.9
-17%
7.8
-3%
5.7
25%
6.6
13%
7.1
7%
7.1
7%
Idle Maximum *
8.2
8.9
-9%
8.1
1%
6
27%
6.8
17%
7.7
6%
7.8
5%
Load Average *
56.4
43.4
23%
52.4
7%
32.1
43%
27.5
51%
30.2
46%
36.3
36%
Load Maximum *
59.8
42.1
30%
62.8
-5%
36.2
39%
32.4
46%
44.7
25%
46
23%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 06min
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
6360U, Iris Graphics 540, 54 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
5257U, Iris Graphics 6100, 75 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03
5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
6600U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh
Battery Runtime
34%
19%
29%
43%
19%
-21%
H.264
483
620
28%
581
20%
510
6%
397
-18%
WiFi v1.3
566
686
21%
539
-5%
620
10%
516
-9%
429
-24%
340
-40%
Load
66
101
53%
94
42%
97
47%
129
95%
115
74%
62
-6%

Pros

+ 出色的机身和工艺品质
+ 巨大的触控版响应精准
+ 安静高效的散热系统
+ 无线模组速度高
+ 非常优秀的屏幕,无分辨率缩放问题
+ 优秀的扬声器
+ 优秀的电池续航时间
+ 稳定的性能,使用电池也没有降低
+ 四个Thunderbolt 3接口...

Cons

- ...不过右侧的接口带宽较低
- 无USB-A或HDMI接口
- 2.4GHz无线连接会与连接的USB-C设备产生干扰
- 较弱的摄像头
- 非常昂贵——特别是自定义升级
In review: Apple MacBook Pro 13 Touch Bar (Late 2016, 2.9 GHz i5)
In review: Apple MacBook Pro 13 Touch Bar (Late 2016, 2.9 GHz i5)

最新的Apple MacBook Pro 13的两个机型和我们预期的一样有很多相似之处。包括出色的机身,尽管减了肥仍然可以保持坚固。同时它们也都为用户带来了市场上最绚丽的最明亮的屏幕之一。它们的触控版也相比以前尺寸更大。除了Touch Bar之外,它们的键盘也一样。由于键程有所缩短,用户需要花一些时间适应,不过它在实际使用中响应准确,可以让人满意。Apple对Touch Bar的设计显得十分成熟,不过它能否成功还要看软件支持的情况。目前我们感觉它最多只能算是个噱头,如果你只是想要普通功能键的功能的话,如改变屏幕亮度,它反而会让使用变得更加复杂。而在电源键中集成Touch ID感应器则毋庸置疑是个实用的创意。

Apple为售价更高的机型以是否搭配Touch Bar作为区分。但如果你打开机身的话,会发现它几乎完全不同。散热系统得到了增强以适合更强劲的硬件(28瓦vs.15瓦热设计功率),我们对此十分欣赏。也因此其他组件位置有所改变,同时电池容量有所降低。这在一定程度上影响了电池续航,特别是在负载下它只能坚持一个小时多一点。在实际使用电池续航测试中,搭配Touch Bar的更贵机型也被无Touch Bar机型击败,不过它在同类设备中依然属于领先水平。但是两个额外Thunderbolt 3接口的设计有些不够负责,和尺寸更大的MacBook Pro 15不同,你将无法使用最高带宽,我们感觉在这个情况下还不如搭配一些其他接口。

说到这里,我们就很接近它的潜在问题了。目前要正常使用MacBook Pro 13的话,几乎无法避免使用转接器。毋庸置疑的是,这四个通用接口让这台设备与未来更加接轨,不过我们认为两个可能就够了。特别是缺少SD读卡器对于一些摄影师来说就是一种否决。同时它的接口还有和2.4GHz无线网的干扰问题,在连接USB-C设备后用户可能会遇到网络连接的问题。这是否可以通过软件更新得到解决还十分值得质疑。和同门师弟一样,我们因此为它降低了2%的分数。这让人感到十分遗憾,因为它的无线网卡提供了非常优秀的传输速度。

最后需要说到的是它的售价,或者相比入门机型的额外价码。1799美元(约12394人民币)的起售价已经很高了,Touch Bar机型略高的性能是否值得额外的300美元(约2066人民币)十分值得质疑。这两台设备在日常使用中速度都已经很快,专业用户是否会对些许的性能优势(非四核处理器,无独立显卡)感到满意也是个问题。

整体上,Apple最新的MacBook Pro 13 Touch Bar是一台非常优秀的亚笔记本电脑。不过它的“Pro”头衔是否名副其实?这大概要看你的使用需要了,在一些方面它已经是业内的最高标准,但大部分用户可能很难找到合适的(现代)标准来衡量它。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) - 12/07/2016 v6(old)
Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
93 /  98 → 95%
Keyboard
90%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
50 / 80 → 62%
Weight
71 / 35-78 → 84%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
63 / 68 → 93%
Application Performance
87 / 87 → 100%
Temperature
92 / 91 → 100%
Noise
97%
Audio
91 / 91 → 100%
Camera
63 / 85 → 74%
Add Points
-2%
Average
77%
90%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple MacBook Pro 13 (2016年末, 2.9 GHz i5, Touch Bar) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff, 2016-12- 6 (Update: 2016-12- 7)