Notebookcheck

华硕 Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 笔记本电脑简短评测

实用型全功能设备! 这是华硕带来的又一款13.3寸Zenbook。搭配的Skylake处理器和独立显卡让它速度不俗。请阅读我们的详尽评测了解它是否也有弱点。
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Ultrabook Windows
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T (ZenBook UX310 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 1242 MHz, Memory: 900 MHz, DDR3 (Micron), ForceWare 375.86, Nvidia Optimus, HD Graphics 520
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, AU Optronics AUO142D, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar HTS541010A7E630, 1000 GB 机械硬盘 @ 5400 rpm
Soundcard
Conexant SmartAudio HD
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.35 x 323 x 223
Battery
48 Wh, 4240 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声,位于底部, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, Asus电脑包,电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.466 kg, Power Supply: 170 g
Price
1199 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

344 mm 239 mm 24.4 mm 1.9 kg338.6 mm 224.3 mm 19.5 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 223 mm 18.35 mm 1.5 kg322 mm 223 mm 17.3 mm 1.6 kg309.6 mm 210.9 mm 14.8 mm 1.3 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
 
77.8 MB/s ∼100% +129%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
73.7 MB/s ∼95% +117%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
 
73.1 MB/s ∼94% +115%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
 
34 MB/s ∼44%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
 
30.3 MB/s ∼39% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
 
87.1 MB/s ∼100% +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
 
83.28 MB/s ∼96% +110%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
80.77 MB/s ∼93% +103%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
 
39.7 MB/s ∼46%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
 
37.3 MB/s ∼43% -6%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
676 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
609 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
556 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
421 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
255
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUO142D
i1 Pro
Maximum: 255 cd/m² Average: 240.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 247 cd/m²
Contrast: 574:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.34% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14.00
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
8%
9%
Display P3 Coverage
61.92
65.98
7%
66.95
8%
sRGB Coverage
88.34
95.5
8%
96.54
9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.98
67.76
8%
68.77
9%
Response Times
-6%
-13%
113%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 (20, 19)
35 (16, 19)
10%
49 (20, 29)
-26%
38.4 (14.8, 23.6)
2%
36.4 (18, 18.4)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (7, 17)
31 (9, 22)
-29%
27 (8, 19)
-13%
24.8 (10.8, 14)
-3%
25.2 (14, 11.2)
-5%
PWM Frequency
50 (30)
50 (50)
0%
50 (30)
0%
220
340%
Screen
6%
35%
17%
-0%
Brightness middle
247
325
32%
347
40%
290
17%
220
-11%
Brightness
240
298
24%
334
39%
280
17%
209
-13%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
80
-11%
93
3%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
19%
0.27
37%
0.31
28%
0.28
35%
Contrast
574
929
62%
1285
124%
935
63%
786
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.74
6.2
-31%
3.29
31%
3.88
18%
4.58
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.14
10.82
-18%
4.69
49%
8.19
10%
11.47
-25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.87
6.32
-30%
3.62
26%
5.47
-12%
2.34
52%
Gamma
2.57 86%
2.3 96%
2.23 99%
2.33 94%
2.26 97%
CCT
7450 87%
6926 94%
7307 89%
6469 100%
6661 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
58
2%
62
9%
63.3
11%
34.6
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
90
2%
95
8%
96.64
10%
54.2
-38%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 3%
10% / 21%
46% / 33%
1% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

Grayscales
Grayscales
Color fidelity
Color fidelity
Color Saturation
Color Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9713 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T.
The viewing angles of the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
 
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
147 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
130 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
118 Points ∼80% -9%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
115 Points ∼78% -12%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
114 Points ∼78% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
662 Points ∼100% +102%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
327 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
294 Points ∼44% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
292 Points ∼44% -11%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
270 Points ∼41% -17%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
1.67 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
1.48 Points ∼89%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.29 Points ∼77% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.21 Points ∼72% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
7.42 Points ∼100% +136%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.23 Points ∼44% +3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.21 Points ∼43% +2%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
3.15 Points ∼42%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
6407 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
5620 Points ∼88% -12%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
14075 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
12670 Points ∼90% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
243.68 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
208.98 Points ∼86%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
194.52 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
178.14 Points ∼73% -15%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
165.18 Points ∼68% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
37996 Points ∼100% +28%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
29762 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
25958 Points ∼68% -13%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
25149 Points ∼66% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1391.2 ms * ∼100% -16%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1381.8 ms * ∼99% -16%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
1196.3 ms * ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
994.3 ms * ∼71% +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6502
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10897
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4904
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6549 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
14075 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6407 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
45.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
327 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
62.78 fps
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3769 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3337 Points ∼89% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
3292 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
3238 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3144 Points ∼83% -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4603 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4463 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4312 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4274 Points ∼93% -7%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4440 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4241 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3961 Points ∼89% -11%
PCMark 7
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4840 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3933 Points ∼81%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
2481 Points ∼51% -37%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
5585 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5305 Points ∼95%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4866 Points ∼87% -8%
PCMark Vantage Result
13885 points
PCMark 7 Score
5305 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3769 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4440 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4603 points
Help
Sandisk delivers the SSD in the M.2 2280 format.
Sandisk delivers the SSD in the M.2 2280 format.
M.2 SSD when incorporated
M.2 SSD when incorporated
The 2.5-inch hard drive in its place.
The 2.5-inch hard drive in its place.
The hard drive rotates at 5400 rpm.
The hard drive rotates at 5400 rpm.
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
42%
109%
48%
-6%
Read Seq
468.1
508.4
9%
1209
158%
502.4
7%
469.3
0%
Write Seq
319.2
302.7
-5%
314
-2%
442
38%
309.1
-3%
Read 512
318.6
419.9
32%
411.4
29%
Write 512
272.8
302.6
11%
414.3
52%
Read 4k
22.03
33.3
51%
43.4
97%
29.18
32%
14
-36%
Write 4k
72.07
85.76
19%
153.4
113%
86.5
20%
73.94
3%
Read 4k QD32
147.4
395.8
169%
487.6
231%
358.1
143%
149.5
1%
Write 4k QD32
200.2
294.3
47%
312.2
56%
319.8
60%
204.6
2%
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Transfer Rate Minimum: 52 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 107.1 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 84.8 MB/s
Access Time: 21.7 ms
Burst Rate: 241.4 MB/s
CPU Usage: 15.8 %
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
12078 Points ∼6% +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
9230 Points ∼5% +8%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8552 Points ∼4% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
8519 Points ∼4%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2091 Points ∼4% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1718 Points ∼3% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1589 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1553 Points ∼3% -2%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
46764 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
45561 Points ∼6% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
43587 Points ∼6% -7%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2636 Points ∼4% +14%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2508 Points ∼4% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2417 Points ∼4% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2321 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2221 Points ∼4% -4%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2805 Points ∼7% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2578 Points ∼6% +6%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2553 Points ∼6% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2424 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2330 Points ∼5% -4%
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard AA:0x AF:0x
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14195 Points ∼26% +37%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
11658 Points ∼22% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
10351 Points ∼19%
3DMark 2001SE Standard
28793 points
3DMark 03 Standard
28408 points
3DMark 05 Standard
20654 points
3DMark 06 Standard
10351 points
3DMark 11 Performance
2424 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44072 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6264 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1394 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
716 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
514 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 85.9 48.7 39.4 13.3 fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 67.2 43.8 29.1 10.7 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 24 16.3 8.7 5.3 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.3363334.637.32536.73533.239.636.73147.942.636.639.947.94037.935.232.435.237.95031.933.631.632.331.96332.531.429.128.232.58027.234.926.72627.210025.928.125.82625.912526.127.525.425.426.116024.325.224.623.324.320027.625.922.923.827.625023.732.621.922.723.731524.727.321.121.624.740023.12619.920.223.150023.226.72019.623.263022.326.918.918.622.380024.527.618.418.624.5100025.228.418.21825.2125025.328.717.717.425.3160025.228.817.917.925.2200025.830.317.817.525.8250026.430.717.817.826.4315024.828.61817.924.8400023.728.7181823.7500021.425.318.418.321.4630021.324.818.418.421.3800020.322.918.518.420.3100001920.618.418.4191250018.719.518.318.218.71600018.91918.318.418.9SPL36.240.130.630.536.2N2.53.51.41.42.5median 24.3median 27.3median 18.4median 18.4median 24.3Delta1.71.71.821.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
The small fan is not disturbing.
The small fan...
The small fan is not disturbing.
...is not disturbing.

Noise Level

Idle
30.5 / 30.5 / 31.5 dB(A)
HDD
30.9 dB(A)
Load
36.2 / 40 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Noise
-7%
-3%
5%
-0%
off / environment *
30.5
32.2
-6%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
28.9
5%
Idle Minimum *
30.5
32.5
-7%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
29.2
4%
Idle Average *
30.5
34.6
-13%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
29.2
4%
Idle Maximum *
31.5
34.6
-10%
31.15
1%
29.2
7%
30.8
2%
Load Average *
36.2
38.7
-7%
38.2
-6%
33.5
7%
38
-5%
Load Maximum *
40
39.9
-0%
41.7
-4%
38.8
3%
44.3
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test: Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test: Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test: only Furmark
Stress test: only Furmark
Stress test: only Prime95
Stress test: only Prime95
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
Heat
-13%
-12%
-32%
-21%
Maximum Upper Side *
38.5
43.4
-13%
51
-32%
51.6
-34%
44.1
-15%
Maximum Bottom *
40.4
43.2
-7%
47
-16%
55.2
-37%
44.9
-11%
Idle Upper Side *
24.8
28
-13%
24.4
2%
30.7
-24%
32.4
-31%
Idle Bottom *
23.8
28.2
-18%
24.6
-3%
31.5
-32%
30.2
-27%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 31.8 °C38.5 °C33.3 °C 
 34.6 °C38.4 °C28.4 °C 
 27.7 °C25.2 °C27 °C 
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 31.7 °C
34.6 °C40.4 °C34.5 °C
31.3 °C36 °C33.5 °C
28.4 °C29.1 °C29.8 °C
Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 33.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  53 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.7 °C / 81.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
The speaker grills are on the front side.
The speaker grills are on the front side.
The two speakers stem from Harman/Kardon.
The two speakers...
The two speakers stem from Harman/Kardon.
...stem from Harman/Kardon.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.134.635.12534.739.634.73138.339.938.34033.135.233.15030.132.330.16327.928.227.98028262810034.12634.112539.225.439.216041.223.341.220044.923.844.925052.622.752.631557.921.657.940060.120.260.15006119.66163062.918.662.980063.218.663.2100062.31862.3125065.317.465.3160065.817.965.8200067.617.567.6250069.917.869.9315071.517.971.5400072.91872.9500072.118.372.1630072.318.472.3800071.518.471.5100007118.4711250070.918.270.91600068.218.468.2SPL81.730.581.7N49.91.449.9median 65.3median 18.4median 65.3Delta8.928.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011TApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.62 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3 / 5.6 / 6.8 Watt
Load midlight 48.7 / 63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
6500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP, IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14.00
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Power Consumption
-31%
-6%
-51%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
3
4.9
-63%
4
-33%
5
-67%
4
-33%
Idle Average *
5.6
9.4
-68%
6.6
-18%
9.9
-77%
6.4
-14%
Idle Maximum *
6.8
10.7
-57%
7.4
-9%
10.8
-59%
7
-3%
Load Average *
48.7
46
6%
41.7
14%
52.4
-8%
45.5
7%
Load Maximum *
63
47.2
25%
52.4
17%
89.8
-43%
62.2
1%

* ... smaller is better

The 48 Wh lithium ion battery...
The 48 Wh lithium ion battery...
... is screwed inside.
... is screwed inside.
maximum battery life
maximum battery life
minimum battery life
minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging time
Charging time
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
14h 38min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
8h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 43min
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
6500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 53 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
11%
-14%
-30%
-32%
Reader / Idle
878
958
9%
718
-18%
660
-25%
H.264
419
424
1%
423
1%
357
-15%
WiFi v1.3
486
433
-11%
389
-20%
298
-39%
329
-32%
Load
103
147
43%
83
-19%
61
-41%

Pros

+ 优秀的电池续航
+ 丰富的接口
+ 背光键盘
+ 大尺寸触控版
+ 附赠笔记本保护套
+ 独立显卡
+ 高系统性能
+ 坚固的机身
+ 雅致简洁的设计

Cons

- 较差的屏幕品质
- 50赫兹屏幕闪烁
- 可视角度范围窄
- 按键反馈僵硬
- 屏幕转轴不稳定
In review: the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T. Test model provided by Asus Germany.
In review: the Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T. Test model provided by Asus Germany.

华硕的Zenbook系列向来以轻盈便携闻名,我们也完全认同这台华硕UX310UQ很好地延续了这个优势。Zenbook UX310UQ是华硕带来的一台续航能力很强的亚笔记本电脑,它采用了高端材质,机身品质优良。我们的测试机配置售价约1200欧元(约8752人民币),提供了优秀的系统性能和很长的电池续航。

第一眼看上去华硕Zenbook UX310UQ显得十分高端。较轻的重量和长续航时间也让这台设备十分适合日常便携使用。这台雅致的设备需要用户拿出1200欧元(约8752人民币)的预算。

它的内置TN屏幕让我们十分失望。在这个价位的设备应该配备更好的屏幕。它的输入设备也不能完全让人满意。因此Zenbook UX310UQ可能不会让需要长时间编辑文档的用户一直高兴。随机附赠的保护套是个小优势。另外,华硕在连接性上考虑得十分周全。作为一台13寸的设备,它提供了可用于连接外设的丰富接口。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T - 12/06/2016 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
81 /  98 → 83%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
75%
Connectivity
53 / 80 → 67%
Weight
69 / 35-78 → 79%
Battery
89%
Display
82%
Games Performance
62 / 68 → 91%
Application Performance
86 / 87 → 98%
Temperature
94 / 91 → 100%
Noise
90%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
64 / 85 → 75%
Average
76%
84%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2016-12-10 (Update: 2016-12-11)