Notebookcheck Logo

联想 IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (80TK003KGE) 笔记本电脑简短评测

银色伴侣! 联想推出了又一台搭配超低电压处理器和英特尔Iris Graphics集成显卡的14寸轻薄笔记本。它希望挤入高端产品之间,不过并没有成功。我们的深入评测将会说明为什么这台联想的亚笔记本电脑未能成功,它在测试中的表现又是如何。
Skylake Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (Ideapad 500 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6267U 2 x 2.9 - 3.3 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Core: 1100 MHz, 20.19.15.4390
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4, 1866 MHz, 单通道, 1个内存槽已占用
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, NV140FHM-N41, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 262K, 6 Bit, 防反射, glossy: no
Storage
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
, 2.5寸固态硬盘, 193 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 立体声, Card Reader: MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.5 x 340 x 240
Battery
30 Wh, 4050 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p高清
Additional features
Speakers: HARMAN音响系统, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LifeSafe, Lenovo Solution Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.542 kg, Power Supply: 230 g
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

340 mm 240 mm 19.5 mm 1.5 kg340 mm 240 mm 19.5 mm 1.6 kg328 mm 234 mm 25.6 mm 1.6 kg327 mm 228 mm 19.7 mm 1.6 kg327 mm 228 mm 19.7 mm 1.6 kg326.5 mm 226 mm 12.6 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
 
61 MB/s +23%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
 
54 MB/s +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
 
49.5 MB/s
Asus X302UV-FN016T
 
27.9 MB/s -44%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
 
22.4 MB/s -55%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
 
15 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
 
85.7 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
 
83.4 MB/s
HP Envy 13-d020ng
 
83 MB/s 0%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
 
37.1 MB/s -56%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
 
27.3 MB/s -67%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
 
27.1 MB/s -68%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
372 MBit/s +39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
268 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
390 MBit/s +34%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
291 MBit/s
270
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NV140FHM-N41 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 276 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 263 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1071:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.95 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
NV140FHM-N41, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Chi Mei CMN14A7, 1920x1080, 14.00
Asus X302UV-FN016T
InfoVision M133NWN1 R3, 1366x768, 13.30
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
LG LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.30
HP Envy 13-d020ng
AU Optronics AUO272D, 1920x1080, 13.30
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.30
Display
-5%
13%
-9%
47%
-9%
Display P3 Coverage
42.88
40.74
-5%
48.37
13%
39.18
-9%
63.7
49%
39.05
-9%
sRGB Coverage
64.1
60.6
-5%
72.6
13%
58.6
-9%
93
45%
58.7
-8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
44.3
42.15
-5%
49.98
13%
40.51
-9%
65.1
47%
40.35
-9%
Response Times
8%
6%
-12%
116%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 ?(17, 28)
43 ?(22, 21)
4%
42 ?(20, 22)
7%
41 ?(16, 25)
9%
34 ?(11, 23)
24%
46 ?(19, 27)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(7, 19)
23 ?(8, 15)
12%
23 ?(6, 17)
12%
34.4 ?(11.6, 12.8)
-32%
24 ?(5, 19)
8%
24 ?(5, 19)
8%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(60)
50 ?(90)
0%
208 ?(40)
316%
Screen
-43%
-14%
-21%
17%
-13%
Brightness middle
257
249
-3%
218
-15%
247
-4%
345
34%
250
-3%
Brightness
263
235
-11%
210
-20%
239
-9%
335
27%
247
-6%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
88
-2%
81
-10%
95
6%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.24
0.44
-83%
0.5
-108%
0.38
-58%
0.25
-4%
0.43
-79%
Contrast
1071
566
-47%
436
-59%
650
-39%
1380
29%
581
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.44
9.47
-74%
3.89
28%
5.95
-9%
4.94
9%
4.51
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.93
15.41
-41%
7.11
35%
14.2
-30%
8.85
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.95
10.22
-159%
4.9
-24%
5.25
-33%
5.85
-48%
3.18
19%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.34 94%
2.41 91%
2.42 91%
2.25 98%
2.43 91%
CCT
6896 94%
11451 57%
7860 83%
6736 96%
7105 91%
6743 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
39
-2%
46
15%
37.28
-7%
60
50%
37
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64
57
-11%
73
14%
58.37
-9%
93
45%
58
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -29%
2% / -5%
-14% / -17%
60% / 41%
-6% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Grayscale
Grayscale
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Saturation Sweeps
Saturation Sweeps

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC Latency
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
138 Points +12%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz
125 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
123 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
115 Points -7%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
112 Points -9%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
97 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
339 Points +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
314 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz
313 Points 0%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
291 Points -7%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
290 Points -8%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
285 Points -9%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
1.58 Points +17%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz
1.4 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
1.35 Points
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
1.33 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
1.13 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
3.71 Points +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
3.44 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz
3.43 Points 0%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
3.2 Points -7%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
3.09 Points -10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
5789 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
13975 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
209.3 Points +60%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
197.5 Points +51%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
194.6 Points +49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
130.9 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
33031 Points +10%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz
30419 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
30059 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
29057 Points -3%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
28525 Points -5%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
27593 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
1961 ms *
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
1311 ms * +33%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz
1291 ms * +34%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
1267 ms * +35%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz
1251 ms * +36%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz
1151 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6941
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10595
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4903
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7254 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
13975 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
5789 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
36.75 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.35 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
314 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
123 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.42 fps
Help
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 7
PCMark 7
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4079 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3710 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3466 Points -7%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
3246 Points -13%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
3209 Points -14%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3006 Points -19%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4676 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
4579 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Hynix HFS128G3MND
4464 Points -3%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
4155 Points -9%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
4113 Points -10%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4064 Points -11%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4792 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
4327 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3885 Points -10%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
3774 Points -13%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3592 Points -17%
PCMark 7
Score
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
5979 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
5340 Points
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
5197 Points -3%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Hynix HFS128G3MND
4955 Points -7%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4811 Points -10%
Productivity
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4481 Points +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4334 Points +2%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
4247 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, 2900 MHz, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
4232 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3837 Points -9%
PCMark 7 Score
5340 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3710 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4327 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4579 points
Help
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskMark
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Hynix HFS128G3MND
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-4%
-40%
-7%
-13%
-11%
Read Seq
510
507
-1%
428.2
-16%
515
1%
478.7
-6%
522
2%
Write Seq
458.8
309.5
-33%
178.6
-61%
338
-26%
268.5
-41%
447.4
-2%
Read 512
399.7
409.5
2%
282.6
-29%
368.1
-8%
386.6
-3%
392.3
-2%
Write 512
299.3
308.3
3%
179.1
-40%
338.6
13%
268.8
-10%
388
30%
Read 4k
35.27
36.24
3%
6.559
-81%
28.88
-18%
26.88
-24%
21.1
-40%
Write 4k
90.2
93.3
3%
71.2
-21%
74.2
-18%
78.7
-13%
71.1
-21%
Read 4k QD32
397.7
394.5
-1%
253
-36%
319.9
-20%
369.4
-7%
248
-38%
Write 4k QD32
257.3
241.6
-6%
174
-32%
309.4
20%
259.7
1%
212.9
-17%
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Sequential Read: 510 MB/s
Sequential Write: 458.8 MB/s
512K Read: 399.7 MB/s
512K Write: 299.3 MB/s
4K Read: 35.27 MB/s
4K Write: 90.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 397.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 257.3 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark 11
 
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
12812 Points +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
8885 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
8549 Points -4%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7745 Points -13%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
7733 Points -13%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7031 Points -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
1589 Points +55%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1520 Points +48%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1282 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1025 Points
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
848 Points -17%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
113807 Points +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
78253 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
73997 Points -5%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
68430 Points -13%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
62078 Points -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
50719 Points -35%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
2703 Points +39%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
2423 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1943 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1888 Points -3%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1487 Points -23%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1483 Points -24%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
2524 Points +42%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
2366 Points +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1782 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1747 Points -2%
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1341 Points -25%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1326 Points -26%
3DMark 11 Performance
1943 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
60650 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6252 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
968 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
414 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 61.3 34 29 7.8
Battlefield 4 (2013) 59.9 33.4 24.8 8.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 23.6 16.2 9.5 4.3

Noise Level

Idle
32.2 / 32.2 / 32.3 dB(A)
HDD
32.2 dB(A)
Load
38.4 / 39.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940M
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 920MX
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520
Noise
2%
4%
2%
3%
8%
off / environment *
31.2
31.3
-0%
31.2
-0%
29.1
7%
Idle Minimum *
32.2
31.3
3%
32.9
-2%
29.1
10%
32.5
-1%
31.5
2%
Idle Average *
32.2
31.7
2%
32.9
-2%
29.1
10%
32.5
-1%
31.5
2%
Idle Maximum *
32.3
31.8
2%
33
-2%
29.1
10%
32.4
-0%
31.5
2%
Load Average *
38.4
36.7
4%
33
14%
41.1
-7%
36
6%
32.4
16%
Load Maximum *
39.9
39.4
1%
34.6
13%
46.4
-16%
36.5
9%
32.3
19%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test Prime95 + Furmark
Stress test Furmark only
Stress test Furmark only
Stress test Prime95 only
Stress test Prime95 only
Max. Load
 34.7 °C39.8 °C35.1 °C 
 28.7 °C36.5 °C32.2 °C 
 26.5 °C26.3 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 32 °C
32.4 °C36.9 °C29 °C
31.6 °C34.8 °C27.3 °C
28 °C26.6 °C25.8 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 30.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.5 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.3 °C / 82.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (0 °C / 0 F).
The speakers are situated...
The speakers are situated...
...on the base's front underside
...on the base's front underside
Equalizer with predefined sound profiles
Equalizer with predefined sound profiles
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.129.534.12532.233.632.23137.234.337.24030.330.630.35030.932.430.96329.428.929.48027.828.427.810026.926.426.91253026.53016031.624.531.620035.424.435.425049.723.149.731556.922.656.940061.221.261.250060.520.460.563060.719.660.780067.419.467.4100061.81961.8125057.718.557.7160059.518.259.520005918.659250057.418.557.4315058.718.658.7400055.718.855.7500056.718.856.7630052.618.852.6800048.518.948.51000054.118.854.11250059.818.759.81600060.618.660.6SPL71.631.271.6N28.81.628.8median 57.4median 18.9median 57.4Delta6.81.46.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISKApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

The compact power supply...
The compact power supply...
...has a maximum output of 65 watts.
...has a maximum output of 65 watts.
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.9 / 7.1 / 8.8 Watt
Load midlight 27.6 / 30.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 14.00
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
6500U, GeForce 940M, 14.00
Asus X302UV-FN016T
6200U, GeForce 920MX, 13.30
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 13.30
HP Envy 13-d020ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.30
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.30
Power Consumption
-20%
6%
-17%
-13%
3%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
3.8
3%
3.3
15%
3.4
13%
4.2
-8%
3.8
3%
Idle Average *
7.1
7.2
-1%
5.1
28%
6.5
8%
7.4
-4%
5.8
18%
Idle Maximum *
8.8
7.6
14%
5.2
41%
7
20%
10.1
-15%
8.1
8%
Load Average *
27.6
40
-45%
29.5
-7%
44.5
-61%
33.4
-21%
30.2
-9%
Load Maximum *
30.2
52
-72%
44
-46%
49.5
-64%
34.7
-15%
32.4
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo installs a 30-Wh lithium-ion battery
Lenovo installs a 30-Wh lithium-ion battery
There is plenty of room for a bigger battery
There is plenty of room for a bigger battery
Maximum battery life
Maximum battery life
Minimum battery life
Minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging time
Charging time
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 38min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
6h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 40min
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
6500U, GeForce 940M, 30 Wh
Asus X302UV-FN016T
6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 51 Wh
HP Envy 13-d020ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 51 Wh
Battery Runtime
-27%
2%
58%
-1%
23%
Reader / Idle
638
346
-46%
1035
62%
906
42%
H.264
231
246
6%
WiFi v1.3
384
257
-33%
392
2%
412
7%
381
-1%
349
-9%
Load
100
64
-36%
206
106%
135
35%

Pros

+ 坚固高品质的机身
+ 不错的输入设备
+ 可视角度稳定的IPS面板
+ 低负载功耗
+ 高速固态硬盘
+ 在负载下相对安静
+ 性价比高
+ 24个月质保

Cons

- 尽管机身内还有空间,电池容量仍然较小
- 英特尔Iris Graphics 550性能未能完全发挥
- 屏幕采用闪烁亮度控制
- 打开机身底盖需要特别工具
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

联想IdeaPad 510S-14ISK整体上是一台十分有吸引力的亚笔记本电脑。它优秀的性价比应该可以让不少消费者动心。这台14寸设备采用了坚固的机身和不错的输入设备,售价799欧元(约5991人民币)。全高清IPS屏幕面板可视角度稳定,同时有均匀的背光和忠实的色彩还原。英特尔酷睿 i5-6267U集成了Iris Graphics 550显卡,为日常使用保证了充足的性能。

联想IdeaPad 510S-14ISK在许多方面都十分优秀。不过,经常出门在外需要长电池续航的用户可能不会对它非常满意。

当然有优势也会有缺点,它的一些不足包括: 

首先,它的电池续航表现较弱。如果希望提供合理的续航时间,它至少应该搭配一块45-50瓦时的电池。它的处理器和显卡性能潜能也无法完全发挥。基于相似硬件的宏碁Aspire V3-372-57CW在一些情况下速度明显更快。不过这并不表示IdeaPad 510S-14ISK响应迟缓。它的性能不足只有在测试软件中比较明显,在使用中很难感受到。除此之外,第七代的英特尔酷睿也将在不久后上市。联想已经在它的在线商店开始宣传了。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK - 09/17/2016 v5.1(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
87 /  98 → 89%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
56 / 80 → 71%
Weight
68 / 35-78 → 77%
Battery
81%
Display
87%
Games Performance
59 / 68 → 87%
Application Performance
84 / 87 → 97%
Temperature
93 / 91 → 100%
Noise
87%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
53 / 85 → 62%
Average
77%
84%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (80TK003KGE) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2016-09-24 (Update: 2016-10- 5)