Notebookcheck

荣耀 8 Pro 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich (translated by Yuchen Wang), 05/13/2017
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

开拓新领地。 华为的最新旗舰机型荣耀8 Pro又树立了新的标准。在接下来的详细测试中,我们将会考量这台设备在各个方面的表现,并与其他高端机型进行对比。

Honor 8 Pro (8 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
5.7 inch 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 515 PPI, 电容式,多点触控, LCD, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 读卡器最大支持 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 霍尔感应器,红外感应器,近距感应器,环境光感应器,指南针,重力感应器,陀螺仪,状态指示灯, USB OTG, Miracast, 状态指示灯
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz LTE (FDD): 频段 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 LTE (TDD): 频段 38, 40, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.97 x 157 x 77.5
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix + 1200万像素, 自动对焦, 搭配LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 77度广角镜头
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器,USB数据线,VR头戴, Emotion UI 5.1 (兼容安卓7.0), 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
184 g, Power Supply: 52 g
Price
549 Euro

 

Size Comparisons

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼84% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼76% +19%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼70% +9%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼68% +6%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼100% +182%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼52% +47%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼51% +44%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼48% +34%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
260 MBit/s ∼40% +12%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
233 MBit/s ∼36%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge picture taken at night
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge picture taken at night
Honor 8 Pro picture taken at night
Honor 8 Pro picture taken at night

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
502
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 541 cd/m² Average: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: 1803:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.27
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC U Play
Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-22%
-33%
-15%
-8%
28%
30%
-54%
16%
Brightness
514
556
8%
366
-29%
432
-16%
434
-16%
552
7%
562
9%
430
-16%
490
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
87
-4%
90
-1%
93
2%
96
5%
93
2%
84
-8%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.43
-43%
0.25
17%
0.36
-20%
Contrast
1803
1272
-29%
1696
-6%
1236
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
4.8
-50%
5.1
-59%
5.7
-78%
2.8
12%
1.59
50%
1.7
47%
7.1
-122%
2.1
34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
4.5
-13%
5.5
-38%
4.1
-3%
3.7
7%
2.01
50%
1.6
60%
6.8
-70%
2.6
35%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.39 100%
2.24 107%
2.32 103%
2.31 104%
2.01 119%
2.13 113%
2.23 108%
2.23 108%
CCT
7120 91%
7194 90%
7388 88%
7359 88%
7164 91%
6321 103%
6435 101%
7866 83%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
81.57
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
99.87
100

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30.8 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points ∼64%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼43% -33%
HTC U Play
51628 Points ∼23% -65%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼58% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼56% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% +13%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼70% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% -12%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼22%
HTC U Play
2825 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6375 Points ∼23%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼15%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼34%
HTC U Play
775 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1952 Points ∼35%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼33%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼26%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points ∼34%
HTC 10
4021 Points ∼22% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼36% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points ∼38%
HTC 10
1654 Points ∼34% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼42% +9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% -14%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points ∼84% +15%
HTC U Play
1498 Points ∼50% -32%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼56% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼70% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼81% +11%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼57% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼59% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points ∼32%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +38%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points ∼15% -54%
HTC U Play
349 Points ∼6% -80%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼54% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +99%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points ∼47%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% +24%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points ∼25% -48%
HTC U Play
421 Points ∼11% -77%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼64% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +74%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points ∼63%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼73% +16%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼78% +23%
HTC U Play
1516 Points ∼50% -20%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼50% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼66% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼82% +30%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼48% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼61% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points ∼24%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% +52%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% -44%
HTC U Play
565 Points ∼7% -70%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59% +147%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +158%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% +78%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points ∼37%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% +42%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% -36%
HTC U Play
657 Points ∼13% -65%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼63% +69%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼54% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼80% +112%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼52% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61% +62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points ∼21%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼21% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼21% +1%
HTC U Play
9970 Points ∼14% -34%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼28% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼27% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼29% +38%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼31% +48%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼29% +38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points ∼7%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% -32%
HTC U Play
11713 Points ∼3% -64%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% +3%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points ∼13%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% -23%
HTC U Play
11275 Points ∼6% -56%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% +14%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% +20%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps ∼3%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +60%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼3% -5%
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼1% -58%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6% +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +142%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% +112%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps ∼13%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% -7%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼9% -27%
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼4% -69%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -2%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% +3%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% -38%
HTC U Play
7.1 fps ∼1% -76%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% +72%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% +59%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +41%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% +60%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼5% -5%
HTC U Play
7 fps ∼2% -65%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼7% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% +90%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12% +125%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% +30%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼2% -52%
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼1% -77%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼6% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +100%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +52%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps ∼7%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +92%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼6% -15%
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼3% -63%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +77%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% +146%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% +15%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps ∼4%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼2% -59%
HTC U Play
2.5 fps ∼1% -83%
HTC 10
18 fps ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7% +67%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼6% +33%
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼5% +7%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps ∼0%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼0% +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps ∼0% -38%
HTC U Play
2.5 fps ∼0% -77%
HTC 10
10 fps ∼0% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼0% +18%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼1% +82%
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0% -11%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points ∼89%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼86% -3%
HTC U Play
3356 Points ∼40% -54%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼70% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼56% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼70% -21%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼68% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼92% +4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼68% -7%
HTC U Play
10 Points ∼1% -99%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% +3%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -21%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% -15%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points ∼47%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼18% -63%
HTC U Play
666 Points ∼8% -84%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% +51%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +6%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points ∼97%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼63% -35%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼60% -38%
HTC U Play
996 Points ∼23% -77%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼40% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼47% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% -27%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼44% -54%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼50% -49%
System (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points ∼61%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼60% -2%
HTC U Play
2173 Points ∼33% -46%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% +32%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% -16%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points ∼79%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼69% -12%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼53% -32%
HTC U Play
344 Points ∼9% -88%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼58% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼55% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% +11%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼59% -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼62% -21%

Legend

 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Play Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points ∼94% +32%
Huawei P9 Plus
12058 Points ∼86% +20%
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼73% +2%
Honor 8 Pro
10016 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼70% -2%
HTC 10
8905 Points ∼63% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼55% -22%
HTC U Play
3163 Points ∼23% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U Play
9981.6 ms * ∼100% -216%
Honor 8 Pro
3156.7 ms * ∼32%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼32% -0%
HTC 10
3146.3 ms * ∼32% -0%
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼31% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
2792.3 ms * ∼28% +12%
OnePlus 3T
2719.3 ms * ∼27% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564.1 ms * ∼26% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼22% +29%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.12 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei P9 Plus
70 Points ∼93% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼83% +7%
Honor 8 Pro
58.065 Points ∼77%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼77% 0%
OnePlus 3T
54.526 Points ∼73% -6%
HTC 10
52.1 Points ∼69% -10%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼63% -18%
HTC U Play
22.318 Points ∼30% -62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼94% +9%
Honor 8 Pro
141 Points ∼87%
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼83% -4%
OnePlus 3T
135 Points ∼83% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
130 Points ∼80% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼69% -21%
HTC 10
108 Points ∼66% -23%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 64 GB eMMC Flash
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-39%
-51%
-19%
-16%
1%
-33%
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.16
32.19
0%
24.95
-22%
23.6
-27%
65.44
103%
50.36
57%
57.24
78%
45.64
42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.19
54.22
0%
62.48
15%
36.8
-32%
83.3
54%
76.43
41%
71.12
31%
78.51
45%
Random Write 4KB
151.6
152.31
0%
51.23
-66%
52.7
-65%
15.89
-90%
15.79
-90%
15.27
-90%
74.39
-51%
74.93
-51%
Random Read 4KB
166.4
168.42
1%
39.33
-76%
32
-81%
29.92
-82%
86.71
-48%
127.18
-24%
123.57
-26%
117.15
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
187.1
189.83
1%
140.38
-25%
135.5
-28%
115.56
-38%
145.11
-22%
194.18
4%
165.3
-12%
168.32
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
737.8
737.65
0%
284.27
-61%
197.3
-73%
275.09
-63%
487.34
-34%
787.6
7%
436.43
-41%
439.66
-40%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Max. Load
 43 °C41.6 °C39.9 °C 
 41.9 °C39.8 °C44.8 °C 
 40.6 °C40.2 °C42 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 41.5 °C
37.5 °C39.2 °C40.9 °C
37.6 °C38 °C41.2 °C
37.4 °C39 °C39.7 °C
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.82525.432.83125.330.74032.924.95033.634.26331.633.78028.4311002728.112520.831.8160222820021.33925020.852.631521.261.240019.468.650019.570.863017.769.280017.968.1100017.865.1125017.365.5160017.470200016.772.8250017.274.3315018.270.2400017.974.5500017.670.6630017.766.7800017.861.11000017.961.21250018.154.21600018.242.6SPL3082.4N1.352.7median 17.9Honor 8 Promedian 65.5Delta1.31131.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.626.128.726.12625.22625.42725.425.829.325.825.226.125.223.123.823.133.430.833.436.13336.135.428.935.434.724.734.743.324.943.349.71949.753.319.153.356.520.456.559.318.159.363.617.563.664.71764.768.815.968.869.114.569.170.713.770.772.614.372.675.813.475.874.213.674.275.513.375.574.312.974.371.812.771.871.81371.872.212.772.266.61366.65512.75584.427.584.456.9156.9median 66.6OnePlus 3Tmedian 14.5median 66.69.83.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.98 / 2.27 / 2.36 Watt
Load midlight 6.58 / 10.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
8%
35%
23%
15%
33%
42%
15%
40%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.83
15%
0.87
11%
0.92
6%
0.68
31%
0.63
36%
0.68
31%
0.61
38%
0.66
33%
Idle Average *
2.27
2.1
7%
1.2
47%
1.84
19%
1.49
34%
1.1
52%
1.13
50%
1.77
22%
1.01
56%
Idle Maximum *
2.36
2.18
8%
1.27
46%
2
15%
1.91
19%
1.56
34%
1.16
51%
1.81
23%
1.09
54%
Load Average *
6.58
6.57
-0%
4.69
29%
4.3
35%
7.4
-12%
5.95
10%
4.69
29%
6.67
-1%
3.97
40%
Load Maximum *
10.12
9.32
8%
5.63
44%
6.2
39%
9.71
4%
6.7
34%
5.24
48%
10.98
-8%
8.34
18%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 58min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
9h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 01min
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
26%
16%
14%
-6%
-7%
26%
16%
14%
Reader / Idle
1378
1538
12%
1540
12%
1446
5%
1302
-6%
1273
-8%
1565
14%
1423
3%
1371
-1%
H.264
675
947
40%
582
-14%
776
15%
514
-24%
648
-4%
742
10%
810
20%
724
7%
WiFi v1.3
573
758
32%
966
69%
530
-8%
473
-17%
413
-28%
736
28%
494
-14%
407
-29%
Load
181
219
21%
176
-3%
263
45%
223
23%
203
12%
275
52%
282
56%
320
77%

Pros

+ 明亮,高对比度的IPS屏幕
+ QHD分辨率
+ 高性能
+ 6GB内存
+ 高速64GB UFS-2.1闪存
+ 双SIM卡
+ 屏幕色彩准确
+ 优秀的双相机系统...

Cons

- ...不过表现并不顶尖
- 发热量高
- 不支持蓝牙5.0
- 无线模组速度较慢
- 仅USB 2.0接口
- 一般的GPS模组
In the test: Honor 8 Pro. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
In the test: Honor 8 Pro. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

荣耀8 Pro是一台品质上乘、性能出色的雅致高端智能手机。相比一些最新高端设备,尽管它搭配了6GB工作内存,但仍然在不少方面有所欠缺。

在荣耀8 Pro中,我们(仍)没有找到荣耀系列所闻名的高性价比。去年的一些高端智能手机(如三星 Galaxy S7 Edge)甚至在更低价位上提供了更优秀的整体表现,这也由于它们在上市的一年间有了大幅降价。

搭配蓝牙4.2而非5.0,相对“较弱”的显卡,无自动对焦的前置相机,和过时的USB 2.0接口,让荣耀8 Pro与目前最新旗舰机型有了明显差距。另外,它的电池不支持无线充电,机身也没有提供防沙防水等认证。它的机身边框较宽,因此机身/屏幕面积比较高,对于一台2017年的设备来说,它的机身利用效率较低。

整体上,荣耀8 Pro是一台非常成功且值得推荐的华为P10替代机型。不过我们认为,它很难与2017年的优秀旗舰机型相竞争。

除此之外,华为在硬件配置上的吝啬让我们十分遗憾——是否所有荣耀8 Pro用户都可以体验到高速UFS-2.1闪存的好处还尚未可知。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Honor 8 Pro - 05/04/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
49 / 60 → 81%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
55 / 63 → 87%
Application Performance
69 / 70 → 98%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
74%
Average
78%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 荣耀 8 Pro 智能手机简短评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-05-13 (Update: 2017-05-13)