对摩托罗拉 Razr Fold 的评测结论
可以说，摩托罗拉在推出其首款全尺寸折叠手机Razr Fold时采取了稳妥策略：处理器与竞争对手类似，尺寸相近，摄像头规格相仿，设计虽时尚但相对简单，功能方面也几乎没有惊喜。
不过，它确实有一处独特之处：触控笔。
摩托罗拉在定价方面表现得信心十足：尽管市场价格较低，但这款手机绝非最便宜的折叠屏手机。
对PWM敏感的用户在屏幕使用上将不得不忍受这一问题。 摄影爱好者很可能会选择一款传统的高端手机。关于系统更新的声明自相矛盾，这也给人留下了不好的印象。
摩托罗拉 Razr Fold 是折叠屏市场中一款令人兴奋的新成员，将吸引那些寻求独特体验的消费者。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
摩托罗拉对Razr Fold的定价约为1,900美元。
例如，该产品可在lenovo.com上购买。
- $1,582.60Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell Phone, 256GB AI Smartphone, Unlocked Android, AI Photo Edits, Large Screen, Long Battery Life, 2025, US 1 Yr Manufacturer Warranty, Blue Shadow
- $1,379.99Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Unlocked | Made for US 16/512GB | 50MP Camera | Pantone Orient Blue
- $1,261.77Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - Unlocked Smartphone with Gemini Moonstone 256GB
规格
设计与功能——一款获得IP认证的时尚翻盖手机
摩托罗拉 Razr Fold 是一款全尺寸折叠手机；此前，该厂商仅推出过让人联想到早期翻盖手机的翻盖机型。作为首发机型，摩托罗拉推出了两种时尚的潘通配色：“深邃蓝”（Blackend Blue），这是一种非常深的蓝色，背部带有轻微纹理；以及“百合白”（Lily White），这是一种精致的米白色，背部触感光滑。
这款手机非常坚固，几乎不会弯曲，即使有也极其轻微。当手机展开且两侧相互滑动时，铰链会发出轻微的吱吱声。
IP48/IP49认证证实，Razr Fold甚至可以浸入水中。 但同时，应避免在多尘或脏乱的环境中使用，以免损坏内部的精密屏幕玻璃或铰链。
这款折叠屏手机配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间。此外，还有一款配置为 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间的低配版本可供选择。
沟通与操作——即使使用手写输入
摩托罗拉 Razr Fold 搭载了目前最快的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。数据下载速度可超过 2 Gbit/s。
它支持所有您可能需要的 4G 和 5G 频段，因此即使在国际旅行时，您也能毫无障碍地使用移动互联网。 在我们为期两周的测试期间，信号接收情况良好，尽管并非完全完美。
两块屏幕的操作都流畅且响应迅速。外屏的刷新率最高可达 165 Hz，尽管这一功能很少被用到。内屏的 120 Hz 刷新率对于极快的响应来说也绰绰有余。
我们测试的机型配备了Moto Pen Ultra触控笔；遗憾的是，它无法直接收纳在设备上。这支触控笔重量不足5克，通过蓝牙配对。它支持4,096级压力感应，非常适合日常使用。 无论是绘画还是记笔记，在宽大的内屏上操作的效果都与外屏一样流畅。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续发展——更新情况不明
摩托罗拉的折叠屏手机预装了 Android 16 系统。
制造商关于系统更新支持的信息存在矛盾：一方面，他们提到七年；另一方面，支持页面却指出仅提供四年的更新支持。
这符合摩托罗拉对欧盟指令的解读，该指令规定安全更新只需可供下载，但无需保持最新状态。
包装采用无塑料设计；遗憾的是，目前尚无关于该设备的其他可持续性信息。
相机——镜头无处不在
摩托罗拉 Razr Fold 的机身三处不同位置均配备了摄像头，确保几乎能满足任何使用场景的需求。机身背面搭载了最强大的传感器，每颗均为 5000 万像素：包括高灵敏度主摄像头、潜望式长焦摄像头以及超广角摄像头。
主摄像头拍摄效果不错，但清晰度尚未达到传统高端手机的水平。在低光环境下，其曝光表现非常出色。 广角镜头拍摄的全景照片效果尚可，但不要过度放大，否则会发现细节几乎无法辨认。
自拍最好使用前置摄像头或内置摄像头。两者都能拍出不错的自拍照，但内置摄像头的成像质量明显更胜一筹。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow LightUltra wide angle
显示屏——配备HDR屏幕的Razr Fold
这款巨大的 8.1 英寸可折叠显示屏亮度极高，HDR 值远超 3,000 cd/m²。
分辨率很高，因此画面清晰锐利。此外，至少在使用两周后，折痕几乎看不出来。
色彩还原非常准确，但您需要忍受约180 Hz的PWM频闪。外屏的频闪频率甚至更低，因此对此敏感的用户在购买前应先测试屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1236 cd/m²
Contrast: 687:1 (Black: 1.8 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.145
CCT: 6537 K
| Motorola Razr Fold OLED, 2484x2232, 8.1" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8" | Honor Magic V6 OLED, 2352x2172, 8" | Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2480x2248, 8.1" | Huawei Mate X7 OLED, 2416x2210, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -25% | 1% | -57% | -58% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3568 | 2570 -28% | 1229 -66% | 1353 -62% | 1467 -59% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3466 | 2708 -22% | 5773 67% | 1697 -51% | 1496 -57% |
| Response Times | 25% | 37% | 35% | 32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.6 ? | 0.67 ? 58% | 0.65 ? 59% | 0.52 ? 67% | 0.71 ? 56% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.3 ? | 1.4 ? -8% | 0.84 ? 35% | 1.05 ? 19% | 0.93 ? 28% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 180 | 240 | 120 | 180 | 360 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 18 | 13.73 24% | 15.15 16% | 14.43 20% | 15.59 13% |
| Screen | -55% | -35% | -23% | -33% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1236 | 1311 6% | 1291 4% | 1179 -5% | 1005 -19% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 1.8 | ||||
| Contrast (:1) | 687 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 2.4 -140% | 1.4 -40% | 1.6 -60% | 1.4 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.44 | 3.4 -39% | 3.5 -43% | 2.9 -19% | 3.1 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.2 -47% | 2.4 -60% | 1.6 -7% | 2.2 -47% |
| Gamma | 2.145 103% | 2.03 108% | 2.26 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6537 99% | 6413 101% | 6804 96% | 6662 98% | 6890 94% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1307 | 1184 | 1021 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 98 | 97 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-22% | 1% /
-3% | -15% /
-11% | -20% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 180 Hz Amplitude: 18 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 180 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 180 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7741 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定变焦级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是由于比例缩放所致。信息框中显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
户外展示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1144 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.05 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.149
CCT: 6345 K
性能、排放和电池续航——续航表现尚可
高通骁龙 8 Gen 5是一款高端处理器，虽然性能尚未达到顶尖水平，但在日常使用中仍能轻松应对更苛刻的应用程序。在游戏方面，您可以流畅地运行高负载的游戏。
设备发热较为明显，长时间使用后，性能会明显降频超过30%。
该设备配备了内置立体声扬声器。虽然音量仅处于中等水平且低音表现较弱，但中频和高频还原良好，整体音质扎实。想要通过蓝牙连接扬声器或耳机的用户会发现，该设备支持多种编解码格式。
凭借 6,000 毫安时电池，Razr Fold 在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中实现了超过 18 小时的出色续航。这意味着只要不频繁使用手机，您可连续使用数天而无需充电。使用专用充电器充满电约需一小时。
| Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Honor Magic V6 | Oppo Find N6 | Huawei Mate X7 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -31% | 2% | 0% | 24% | -11% | -40% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3719.8 | 4080.35 10% | 3921.41 5% | 3861.06 4% | 4365.76 17% | 3635 ? -2% | 2236 ? -40% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3758 | 2239.55 -40% | 3992.25 6% | 3531.83 -6% | 4112.78 9% | 3202 ? -15% | 1921 ? -49% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 403.4 | 403.69 0% | 411.38 2% | 446.52 11% | 463.43 15% | 413 ? 2% | 311 ? -23% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 695.6 | 51.23 -93% | 667.68 -4% | 637.68 -8% | 1071.05 54% | 485 ? -30% | 360 ? -48% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Motorola Razr Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
Motorola Razr Fold audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.1 / 1.3 / 1.7 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Razr Fold 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 4400 mAh | Honor Magic V6 6660 mAh | Oppo Find N6 6000 mAh | Huawei Mate X7 5525 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | 6% | 2% | 14% | -72% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.1 | 0.63 43% | 0.92 16% | 0.79 28% | 0.53 52% | 1.81 ? -65% | 0.879 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.3 | 1.48 -14% | 1.39 -7% | 1.6 -23% | 1.53 -18% | 2.46 ? -89% | 1.474 ? -13% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.7 | 1.55 9% | 1.53 10% | 1.66 2% | 1.56 8% | 2.75 ? -62% | 1.663 ? 2% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 10.75 | 11.5 ? | 6.75 ? | ||||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 11.31 | 15.2 ? | 11.2 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Razr Fold 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 4400 mAh | Honor Magic V6 6660 mAh | Oppo Find N6 6000 mAh | Huawei Mate X7 5525 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 18.4 | 14.3 -22% | 16.2 -12% | 18 -2% | 17 -8% |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
摩托罗拉 Razr Fold 正式亮相，在竞争中表现不俗。
尽管它仅在少数几个领域树立了新标准，但一旦降价，它可能会成为一个颇具吸引力的选择。
Motorola Razr Fold
- 08/02/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可选方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.8%  | Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1999€ | 243 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.10" 2484x2232 412 PPI OLED |
2. 87.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 2099€ | 215 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.00" 2184x1968 367 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
3. 88.1%  | Honor Magic V6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $1,999.00 HONOR Magic V6 5G PNM-N49 (G... 2. $1,590.00 Honor Magic V5 5... 3. $1,500.00 Honor Magic V5 5... List Price: 2300€ | 224 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 7.95" 2352x2172 403 PPI OLED |
4. 86.4%  | Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: | 225 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI OLED |
5. 84.5%  | Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 935 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 2099€ | 236 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.00" 2416x2210 409 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
