Notebookcheck

华硕 VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 11/14/2017
Geforce Kaby Lake Notebook Security Windows

完成待续。华硕的这台多媒体办公笔记本,强调其设计的优雅和外壳的轻巧。但很难凭借GeForce 940MX,在游戏领域跟上大部队。尽管它有很多不错的特质,但是我们还是不建议购买该机。当然不仅仅是因为它的电池续航能力很平庸。

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T (VivoBook S510 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 1083 - 1189 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 377.05, Nvidia Optimus
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2400 MHz, single channel, 1 of 2 slots occupied
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Storage
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, 128 GB 
, SSD + HDD 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 (5400 rpm)
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 361 x 244
Battery
42 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: VGA
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器,至于底部, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.7 kg, Power Supply: 219 g
Price
950欧元 EUR

 

Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ

Size Comparison

Photo: Asus
Photo: Asus
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.27 MB/s ∼100% +140%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
62.5 MB/s ∼77% +84%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.9 MB/s ∼42%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.3 MB/s ∼29% -31%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.39 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.71 MB/s ∼95% +118%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.4 MB/s ∼43%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.9 MB/s ∼29% -33%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
645 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼82% +4%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
510 MBit/s ∼79%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s ∼77% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
649 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
465 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
278
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 293 cd/m² Average: 275.1 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 293 cd/m²
Contrast: 1172:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.81 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.66 | - Ø
58% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.54
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-2%
7%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 (21, 26)
42 (22, 20)
11%
44.8 (16.4, 28.4)
5%
38.8 (20, 18.8)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16, 12)
32 (18, 14)
-14%
25.6 (6.8, 18.8)
9%
28 (16.4, 11.6)
-0%
PWM Frequency
1087 (90)
Screen
-8%
-11%
-2%
Brightness
275
239
-13%
243
-12%
243
-12%
Brightness Distribution
86
69
-20%
75
-13%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.25
0.18
28%
0.24
4%
0.19
24%
Contrast
1172
1378
18%
1008
-14%
1351
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.81
4.85
-27%
4.65
-22%
5
-31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.66
3.84
-44%
3.39
-27%
2.7
-2%
Gamma
2.54 94%
2.29 105%
2.7 89%
2.32 103%
CCT
6541 99%
6790 96%
6246 104%
6599 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
37
0%
36.69
-1%
36.7
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
57
-2%
57.66
-1%
57.7
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -6%
-2% / -7%
4% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼100% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼96% +12%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼85% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼85% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼100% +124%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
560 Points ∼76% +69%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼45%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼45% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼44% -2%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4964 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4666 Points ∼94% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4577 Points ∼92% +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
4483 Points ∼90%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4042 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
3719 Points ∼92% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points ∼88% +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
3468 Points ∼86%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3468 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4483 points
Help
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
46%
139%
4%
Write 4k QD32
121.8
170.6
40%
319.2
162%
104.8
-14%
Read 4k QD32
279.1
287.9
3%
529.5
90%
348.5
25%
Write 4k
86.19
73.22
-15%
123.4
43%
76.3
-11%
Read 4k
16.05
31.89
99%
34.3
114%
18.83
17%
Write 512
138.2
216.6
57%
414
200%
142.6
3%
Read 512
368.6
310.3
-16%
759
106%
345.6
-6%
Write Seq
138.6
409.9
196%
468.1
238%
141.7
2%
Read Seq
437.6
462.2
6%
1140
161%
491.6
12%
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
Sequential Read: 437.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 138.6 MB/s
512K Read: 368.6 MB/s
512K Write: 138.2 MB/s
4K Read: 16.05 MB/s
4K Write: 86.19 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 279.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 121.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7537 Points ∼100% +180%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
4547 Points ∼60% +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4243 Points ∼56% +58%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2689 Points ∼36%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6002 Points ∼100% +178%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
3603 Points ∼60% +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3545 Points ∼59% +64%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2158 Points ∼36%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38082 Points ∼100% +218%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
21835 Points ∼57% +82%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
21160 Points ∼56% +77%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
11986 Points ∼31%
3DMark 11 Performance
2843 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7748 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1944 points
Help
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 41.425.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 46.926.1fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 43.829.8fps

Noise Level

Idle
31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB(A)
HDD
31.6 dB(A)
Load
43.3 / 43.3 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.935.63435.532.9253434.335.438.6343138.238.839.348.238.24031.933.734.535.631.95038.640.138.83438.66333.33130.332.233.38028.231.726.428.228.210028.728.626.42728.712526.627.524.724.326.616025.7272423.225.720025.625.822.722.825.625026.626.72222.326.631528.729.321.221.528.740026.126.520.320.226.150027.627.819.619.227.663026.627.519.418.926.68002929.720.318.429100030.8311917.930.8125030.530.618.31830.5160032.633.518.617.632.6200034.534.519.717.534.5250034.234.518.217.934.2315032.132.518.41832.1400030.630.918.518.230.6500029.329.818.718.529.363002828.318.618.628800025.52618.818.825.51000021.321.418.918.721.31250020.320.518.918.920.31600019.519.419.119.119.5SPL4343.331.230.743N4.14.31.51.54.1median 28Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189Tmedian 28.3median 19.1median 18.8median 28Delta2.521.31.82.531.934.93335.531.933.636.735.838.633.642.745.349.748.242.733.834.439.235.633.829.934.933.93429.928.729.830.732.228.727.329.130.628.227.326.430.527.12726.424.826.526.524.324.824.724.124.723.224.724.324.123.222.824.322.922.722.722.322.92323.620.821.52322.622.720.420.222.622.322.119.819.222.322.8231918.922.827.628.31918.427.625.426.61817.925.426.327.4181826.324.325.217.917.624.324.625.51817.524.624.125.21817.924.125.92718.21825.921.422.418.418.221.421.822.918.518.521.820.22118.518.620.219.319.718.818.819.31919.318.918.71919.119.51918.919.119.52019.319.119.53636.930.930.7362.42.61.51.52.4median 23Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 23.6median 19median 18.8median 231.71.91.61.81.7hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Max. Load
 30.5 °C38.2 °C37.4 °C 
 23.7 °C29.4 °C36.6 °C 
 23 °C23.8 °C26 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 29.8 °C
36.4 °C49 °C33.3 °C
35.6 °C35 °C26.1 °C
26 °C24.2 °C23.6 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.635.532.6253538.6353136.848.236.8403435.6345038.83438.86328.832.228.88030.728.230.710034.72734.712540.924.340.916041.923.241.920046.122.846.125057.422.357.43156121.56140063.420.263.45006619.26663066.618.966.680065.418.465.4100063.617.963.6125067.21867.2160069.417.669.4200071.217.571.2250073.417.973.4315069.41869.4400069.318.269.3500068.318.568.3630069.818.669.8800069.518.869.5100006818.7681250061.918.961.91600054.719.154.7SPL81.230.781.2N50.91.550.9median 66Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189Tmedian 18.8median 66Delta7.31.87.336.535.536.533.738.633.737.648.237.633.735.633.732.13432.129.432.229.427.528.227.526.12726.128.424.328.440.523.240.544.722.844.756.922.356.959.121.559.162.320.262.364.519.264.572.518.972.57618.47674.317.974.373.31873.373.217.673.274.517.574.575.717.975.776.41876.477.518.277.574.318.574.370.318.670.358.618.858.662.818.762.873.518.973.570.419.170.486.130.786.165.61.565.6median 70.4Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 18.8median 70.49.51.89.530.331.130.331.73133.229.23029.131.328.429.534.133.538.236.831.333.625.539.726.354.825.266.926.670.824.368.222.764.319.461.119.656.518.657.518.764.518.570.918.27618.37118.566.920.96520.364.819.563.619.764.219.756.820.554.219.652.332.480.71.945.7median 19.7Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000median 64.23.25.838.94036.33736.736.334.835.334.936.336.43333.532.631.831.430.130.230.533.729.643.828.850.828.154.127.355.82857.228.359.725.861.925.763.925.366.425.668.524.459.824.867.124.261.324.259.524.262.724.161.223.958.323.854.123.853.123.949.437.475.5334.6median 25.6HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AVmedian 58.326.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.6 / 6.8 / 9.5 Watt
Load midlight 51.6 / 56 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
7200U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
7200U, GeForce 940MX, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
21%
1%
6%
-84%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
2.9
19%
3.7
-3%
2.8
22%
9.4
-161%
Idle Average *
6.8
5.9
13%
6.2
9%
6.3
7%
9.7
-43%
Idle Maximum *
9.5
7.3
23%
8.4
12%
6.9
27%
16.8
-77%
Load Average *
51.6
39.5
23%
50
3%
51.6
-0%
76.5
-48%
Load Maximum *
56
42
25%
65.2
-16%
69.7
-24%
105.6
-89%
Witcher 3 ultra *
86.5

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 03min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
4h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 11min
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
7200U, GeForce 940MX, 42 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, 49 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 70 Wh
Battery Runtime
108%
91%
91%
Reader / Idle
423
916
117%
883
109%
971
130%
WiFi v1.3
255
509
100%
462
81%
481
89%
Load
71
146
106%
129
82%
110
55%

Pros

+ 许多配置可供选择
+ 轻巧,小巧,轻薄
+ 设计优秀
+ 做工精湛
+ 安全功能
+ 良好的触摸板
+ 非常好的对比度
+ 欠佳的固态硬盘
+ 安静
+ 优秀音响系统
+ 拥有节能软件

Cons

- 外壳的稳定性可以更好
- 2x USB 2.0
- 接口位置不理想
- 慢速SD卡读卡器
- 按键软
- 显示屏可以更亮
- 色彩空间覆盖率不足
- 摄像头差
- 电池续航太短
The Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - provided by notebooksbilliger.de
The Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - provided by notebooksbilliger.de

对不起,华硕,你这台外观时尚的VivoBook S15 S510UQ在某种程度上是失败的。 该机在市场上售价近1000欧元(约合1180美元),而且它的外壳稳定性不佳,而且键盘也只是可堪一用。如果电池续航时间只有4小时,那么拥有拥有安全芯片和指纹传感器,体积小巧,重量轻,这些优点有什么用? 在色彩覆盖率低的情况下,图像处理能力如何从良好的对比度和精准的色彩中受益?为什么华硕使用的显卡并没有太多的改进?为什么不配备更快的GeForce MX150? 台湾厂商在哪里找到的速度过时的固态硬盘? 2个 USB 2.0、如蜗牛般的读卡器,以及非常糟糕的摄像头怎么配得上价格?

在我们看来,华硕已经成为改系列笔记本策略下的牺牲品。这一系列的笔记本的价格,让人难以忍受。我们希望1000欧元的定价可以给我们带来更多的东西。如果有人在寻找紧凑型15英寸多媒体电脑,那么这里有一个更好的选择—— 宏碁 Swift 3 SF315 。这是一台我们刚刚评测过的笔电。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - 10/17/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis
77 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
72%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
49 / 81 → 61%
Weight
67 / 67 → 99%
Battery
80%
Display
88%
Games Performance
68 / 85 → 80%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperature
93%
Noise
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
73%
Camera
29 / 85 → 34%
Average
73%
81%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-11-14 (Update: 2017-11-14)