联想 Moto G4 Play 智能手机简短评测
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 412 cd/m²
Contrast: 981:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.4
CCT: 8422 K
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | HTC One A9 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | 22% | 7% | -9% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 412 | 586 42% | 346 -16% | 289 -30% | 518 26% | 418 1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 414 | 566 37% | 349 -16% | 291 -30% | 475 15% | 407 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 84 -11% | 93 -1% | 96 2% | 81 -14% | 95 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.42 | 0.57 -36% | 0.61 -45% | 0.49 -17% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 981 | 1028 5% | 849 -13% | 853 -13% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 4.2 25% | 1.55 72% | 4.7 16% | 6.8 -21% | 3.92 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.7 | 8.4 13% | 7.3 25% | 11.4 -18% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 6.3 9% | 2.05 70% | 3 57% | 7 -1% | 3.81 45% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.39 92% | 2.15 102% | 2.03 108% | 2.35 94% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 8422 77% | 6614 98% | 6267 104% | 6291 103% | 8151 80% | 7361 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8163 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.08 / 0.22 Watt |
| Idle |  0.68 / 1.58 / 1.61 Watt |
| Load |
3.36 / 3.91 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -50% | -12% | 14% | -11% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.68 | 1.15 -69% | 0.9 -32% | 0.61 10% | 0.72 -6% | 0.4 41% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.58 | 2.09 -32% | 1.2 24% | 1.41 11% | 1.5 5% | 1 37% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.61 | 2.17 -35% | 1.4 13% | 1.51 6% | 1.57 2% | 1.2 25% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 3.36 | 5.38 -60% | 3.8 -13% | 2.56 24% | 3.48 -4% | 2.9 14% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 3.91 | 6.08 -55% | 5.9 -51% | 3.1 21% | 6.04 -54% | 5 -28% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 52% | -40% | 2% | -46% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 33.3 | 19.2 -42% | 26.7 -20% | 12.9 -61% | 22.7 -32% | |
| H.264 (h) | 11.4 | 7.8 -32% | 11 -4% | 7.7 -32% | 11.3 -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10.5 | 16 52% | 6.1 -42% | 10.7 2% | 5.9 -44% | 8.8 -16% |
| Load (h) | 5.1 | 2.9 -43% | 6.7 31% | 2.8 -45% | 4.4 -14% |
Pros
Cons
“摩托罗拉的Moto G是一台搭配了引人瞩目的独特功能的中端智能手机。”我们曾经在对Moto G 第三代的评测中得出了这样的结论。这也同样适用于Moto G4。我们的测试机结合了优秀的硬件和不错的性能，而没有任何明显的缺陷。相比前代机型，Moto G4配备了更快的处理器，更大存储空间，相似的屏幕，但售价却有所降低。如果你需要一台实惠而优秀的智能手机，我们建议考虑这台159欧元（约1173人民币）的Moto G4 Play。
联想Moto G4 Play是一台全面的产品，作为一台有独特优势的中端智能手机，它的价位特别实惠。
这台设备也有几个弱点，它的扬声器音量相对较小，而相机也没有给我们很好的印象。它不支持NFC，连接电视也只能通过Chromecast实现。它没有附带Micro-USB数据线也让我们感到十分遗憾。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
- 11/01/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
