Notebookcheck Logo

联想ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 (i5, 3K-IPS) 平板电脑评测

最好的商务二合一平板？ 联想彻底改造了ThinkPad X1 Tablet，它有了一块更大的触摸屏，两个雷电3端口和性能更强的CPU。不过这些四核芯片必须受到主动风扇冷却。ThinkPad X1 Tablet的第三代究竟是一台坚固而完美的机器，还是有一些重大的缺点？
Business Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Tablet Touchscreen Windows
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (ThinkPad Tablet Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-8250U 4 x 1.6 - 3.4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh
Graphics adapter
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 1100 MHz, Memory: 933 MHz
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR3板载内存
Display
13.00 inch 3:2, 3000 x 2000 pixel 271 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, LP130QP1-SPA1, IPS LED, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe, 210 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速传感器, 陀螺仪,, 键盘Pogo接口
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE (Qualcomm Snapdgragon X7), LTE
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 304 x 225.6
Battery
42 Wh Lithium-Ion, 时四芯锂电池, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 9.5 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix auto focus, flash
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟触摸键盘加6排Chiclet键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 65瓦充电器（USB-C），ThinkPad Pen Pro, Lenovo Vantage, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.279 kg, Power Supply: 356 g
Price
11499 Euro
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size & weight comparison

❌
323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg316 mm 207 mm 9.1 mm 1.4 kg304 mm 225.6 mm 8.9 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 231.5 mm 7.9 mm 1.2 kg293 mm 210 mm 9 mm 1.1 kg292 mm 210 mm 9.75 mm 1.3 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
left: MicroSD cardreader & NanoSIM, 2x Thunderbolt 3, Kensington lock, combo audio
left: MicroSD cardreader & NanoSIM, 2x Thunderbolt 3, Kensington lock, combo audio
right: Connector for optional pen-holder, volume buttons, power button (illuminated)
right: Connector for optional pen-holder, volume buttons, power button (illuminated)
bottom: Pogo-pin connector
bottom: Pogo-pin connector
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
142.2 MB/s +80%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
78.9 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s -1%
Average of class Convertible
  (17.7 - 209, n=35, last 2 years)
78.2 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.6 MB/s -8%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
211.8 MB/s +152%
Average of class Convertible
  (22.6 - 263, n=34, last 2 years)
99 MB/s +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.8 MB/s +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Convertible
  (last 2 years)
1003 MBit/s +95%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
598 MBit/s +16%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
598 (549min - 624max) MBit/s +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (519min - 577max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s -14%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
305 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Convertible
  (last 2 years)
1178 MBit/s +86%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
653 MBit/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (560min - 611max) MBit/s -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s -7%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
461 (329min - 528max) MBit/s -27%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
314 MBit/s -50%
419
cd/m²		403
cd/m²		368
cd/m²
445
cd/m²		474
cd/m²		370
cd/m²
442
cd/m²		475
cd/m²		363
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LP130QP1-SPA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 475 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 417.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 470 cd/m²
Contrast: 1436:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13.00		HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13.00		Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.30		Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
SHP1479, , 1920x1280, 12.30		Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 13.30		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12.00
Display
-2%
-3%
2%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
68.1

67.8

67.5
-1%
67.1
-1%
70.5
4%
67.2
-1%
sRGB Coverage
99.4

99.1

96.7
-3%
95.5
-4%
98.6
-1%
90.8
-9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.9

69.3

68.2
-2%
67.9
-3%
71.5
2%
66.5
-5%
Response Times
20%
25%
-3%
12%
43%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 ?(21.2, 26)
47 ?(23, 24)
-0%
43 ?(21, 22)
9%
56.8 ?(26.8, 30)
-20%
42 ?(22, 20)
11%
28.4 ?(15.2, 13.2)
40%
Response Time Black / White *
42.4 ?(19.6, 22.8)
26 ?(14, 12)
39%
25 ?(13, 12)
41%
36 ?(19.6, 16.4)
15%
37 ?(17, 20)
13%
22.8 ?(13.6, 9.2)
46%
PWM Frequency
22000 ?(50)
1852 ?(98)
17000 ?(100)
221.2 ?(49)
Screen
-18%
-5%
-16%
-39%
-23%
Brightness middle
474
452
-5%
484
2%
548
16%
350
-26%
388.1
-18%
Brightness
418
412
-1%
473
13%
545
30%
343
-18%
344
-18%
Brightness Distribution
76
85
12%
91
20%
86
13%
73
-4%
78
3%
Black Level *
0.33
0.48
-45%
0.33
-0%
0.51
-55%
0.29
12%
0.39
-18%
Contrast
1436
942
-34%
1467
2%
1075
-25%
1207
-16%
995
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.2
4.05
-27%
4.29
-34%
3.65
-14%
6.36
-99%
4.6
-44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.1
6.64
-9%
6.46
-6%
7.15
-17%
11.63
-91%
9.1
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
1.56
-73%
1.34
-49%
1.81
-101%
1.7
-89%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
4.87
-8%
4.3
4%
5.5
-22%
8.04
-79%
6.1
-36%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.71 81%
2.51 88%
2.154 102%
2.47 89%
2.07 106%
CCT
5881 111%
7160 91%
7315 89%
7052 92%
7716 84%
7104 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64
62
-3%
62
-3%
65.2
2%
59
-8%
59
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.4
97
-2%
95
-4%
99.1
0%
91
-8%
91
-8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / -10%
6% / -1%
-6% / -11%
-11% / -26%
10% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (68.6 - 287, n=65, last 2 years)
232 Points +65%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points +16%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
151 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3 LTE i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
148 Points +5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
147 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=97)
141.1 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel Core i7-8550U
141 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (110.1 - 2889, n=67, last 2 years)
1583 Points +128%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U (Undervolting)
695 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3 LTE i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
681 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=101)
570 Points -18%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
569 Points -18%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
517 Points -26%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel Core i7-8550U
432 Points -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points -66%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3 LTE i7 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø440 (400.14-681.55)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø488 (465.07-568.99)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø452 (434.07-584.91)
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø486 (481.08-516.94)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
141 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
695 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
97.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
50.3 %
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Convertible
  (1486 - 7963, n=60, last 2 years)
5726 Points +62%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3737 Points +5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3559 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3544 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3448 Points -3%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3335 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3358 - 4081, n=67)
3296 Points -7%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Convertible
  (4404 - 5830, n=3, last 2 years)
4890 Points +41%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3776 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2986 - 4458, n=69)
3584 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3413 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points -11%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3024 Points -13%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4764 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2699 - 5106, n=58)
4646 Points +12%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4348 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4288 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points +3%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4200 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points
Average of class Convertible
  (2921 - 6089, n=3, last 2 years)
4045 Points -2%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4961 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4767 Points
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4669 Points -2%
Average of class Convertible
  (last 2 years)
4645 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3308 - 5090, n=35)
4594 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4454 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3924 Points -18%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3479 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4767 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4136 points
PCMark 10 Score
3544 points
Help
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1604 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1221 MB/s
512K Read: 590 MB/s
512K Write: 692 MB/s
4K Read: 48.26 MB/s
4K Write: 97 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 257.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 392.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Convertible
  (471 - 40768, n=65, last 2 years)
7870 Points +334%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1977 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1812 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1144 - 3432, n=244)
1749 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points -8%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points -8%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1494 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1161 Points -36%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (2965 - 154219, n=50, last 2 years)
32507 Points +256%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points +12%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
9307 Points +2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6205 - 16400, n=225)
9262 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8330 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6164 Points -33%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (365 - 29684, n=65, last 2 years)
5902 Points +396%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1185 Points 0%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 2608, n=213)
1161 Points -2%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1131 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
728 Points -39%
3DMark 11 Performance
2041 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8625 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1103 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 59.2 34.8 30.2 10.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12.1
Rocket League (2017) 59.2 35.1 23.1
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
6824 Points +234%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
2041 Points
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
6759 Points +273%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
1812 Points
1280x720 Performance Physics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
7984 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
7687 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
4658 Points +322%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
1103 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
4935 Points +315%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
1189 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
10115 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
9670 Points
BioShock Infinite | Rocket League | The Witcher 3
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
49.9 fps +394%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
10.1 fps
1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
113 fps +274%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
30.2 fps
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
126.6 fps +264%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
34.8 fps
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
178.5 fps +202%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
59.2 fps
Rocket League
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
64 fps +177%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
23.1 fps
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
88 fps +151%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
35.1 fps
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
149 fps +152%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
59.2 fps
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
15.7 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
29.6 fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
47.2 fps
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
56.8 fps +369%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
12.1 fps
0510152025Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8250U: Ø27.6 (26-29)

Noise Level

Idle
29.8 / 29.8 / 31.3 dB(A)
Load
35.9 / 38.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.8 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G		Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G		Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Noise
3%
3%
6%
2%
off / environment *
29.8
30.3
-2%
30.3
-2%
28.5
4%
30.3
-2%
Idle Minimum *
29.8
30.3
-2%
30.3
-2%
28.5
4%
30.9
-4%
Idle Average *
29.8
30.3
-2%
30.3
-2%
28.5
4%
30.9
-4%
Idle Maximum *
31.3
31.2
-0%
30.3
3%
28.5
9%
32.3
-3%
Load Average *
35.9
32.8
9%
33.5
7%
28.5
21%
32.7
9%
Load Maximum *
38.6
32.9
15%
33.5
13%
41.6
-8%
32.7
15%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 35.1 °C42.4 °C44.3 °C 
 35.2 °C37.8 °C38 °C 
 36.5 °C37.6 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 37.9 °C
47.3 °C48.9 °C43.2 °C
41.5 °C42.4 °C39.9 °C
33 °C33.1 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 48.9 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.6 °C / 99.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.5 °C / -17.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.933.12529.431.83133.731.84032.529.65027.929.26328.325.58026.425.810025.626.512525.62516023.729.820022.935.125022.440.431520.744.140019.450.250019.154.363018.356.580018.660.3100018.161125017.659.5160016.661.4200016.464.4250016.664.3315016.865.2400017.361.9500017.359630017.563.2800017.855.21000017.937.71250017.834.6160001832.8SPL29.873.6N1.330.4median 18median 55.2Delta1.712.330.831.930.832.33432.333.233.533.229.732.729.728.53328.528.328.828.326.627.326.630.125.730.141.124.641.150.223.750.253.322.453.353.521.753.555.420.955.457.920.957.951.419.351.462.118.562.171.318.471.374.118.474.171.117.671.173.117.573.169.917.669.973.317.773.374.417.674.466.51866.568.218.168.264.718.164.762.318.162.361.118.361.160.518.160.565.318.165.382.630.482.649.21.349.2median 62.3median 18.3median 62.38.71.48.733.331.433.330.530.930.533.830.433.832.728.632.73130.83128.927.128.928.52828.534.82634.84225.44249.523.649.551.922.451.951.321.551.352.720.652.758.620.558.658.419.358.461.818.961.869.418.369.46618.16659.717.759.761.517.461.566.317.366.368.917.668.969.117.869.163.71863.764.618.164.658.218.458.253.518.353.556.118.356.147.618.247.637.618.237.67730.47736.71.336.7median 58.4median 18.3median 58.47.51.47.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGEHP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EAMicrosoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.8 / 9 / 10.5 Watt
Load midlight 42.8 / 57.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.00		HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.00		Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30		Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.30		Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00		Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 		Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
11%
20%
22%
5%
34%
19%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
4.8
4.9
-2%
3.2
33%
3
37%
4.7
2%
5
-4%
3.81 ?(1 - 12.4, n=259)
21%
5.44 ?(10.1 - 16.6, n=59, last 2 years)
-13%
Idle Average *
9
8.9
1%
8.7
3%
7.2
20%
9.4
-4%
6.3
30%
6.94 ?(2.8 - 15.7, n=261)
23%
8.27 ?(16.9 - 20.7, n=59, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Maximum *
10.5
11
-5%
10.4
1%
10
5%
16
-52%
7.8
26%
8.75 ?(3.8 - 30, n=259)
17%
10.8 ?(4.7 - 29.9, n=58, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Average *
42.8
32
25%
29.2
32%
37.1
13%
26.4
38%
19.5
54%
35 ?(8.1 - 51.6, n=259)
18%
46.7 ?(7.6 - 101.3, n=58, last 2 years)
-9%
Load Maximum *
57.8
36
38%
40.8
29%
38.2
34%
34
41%
19.6
66%
47.5 ?(22 - 96.3, n=261)
18%
65.4 ?(10.5 - 155.7, n=58, last 2 years)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
13h 10min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
6h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 23min
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh		HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh		Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh		Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh		Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620,  Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh		Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
14%
41%
-12%
39%
19%
45%
Reader / Idle
790
781
-1%
1083
37%
662
-16%
1112 ?(528 - 1667, n=28, last 2 years)
41%
H.264
523
389
-26%
769 ?(562 - 999, n=13, last 2 years)
47%
WiFi v1.3
395
459
16%
509
29%
300
-24%
551
39%
441
12%
563 ?(329 - 876, n=62, last 2 years)
43%
Load
83
137
65%
131
58%
84
1%
134
61%
121.7 ?(53 - 219, n=47, last 2 years)
47%

Pros

+ 稳定坚固的机身
+ 强劲的CPU性能
+ 优秀的输入设备
+ 内置LTE
+ 两个雷电3接口
+ 屏幕素质高
+ 三年保修
+ 亮度传感器也能控制键盘背光

Cons

- 亮面屏
- 没有USBA接口
- 风扇在负载下声音较响
- 高负载下温度高
- 续航一般
- 外放效果差
- 材料易沾染指纹（特别是键盘）
联想ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 平板电脑评测. Review unit provided by Campuspoint.
联想ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 平板电脑评测. Review unit provided by Campuspoint.

让我们从介绍性问题开始——新的联想ThinkPad X1 Tablet是最好的商务二合一平板吗？这个问题一般无法回答，因为竞品的细节太不相同了，这往往取决于用户计划如何使用该设备。如果需要较长的电池寿命，并且如果设备经常在户外使用，则有更好的选择。其他设备也提供更多不同的端口。如果需要雾面屏，用户也不会对X1平板电脑感到满意。

尽管如此，我们在测试中已经看到，第三代X1平板电脑总体来说是一款非常好的设备。是的，弱点的确存在，但这些不会以同样的方式影响每个用户。如果设备主要与扩展坞一起使用，并且如果平板电脑主要用于通过会议记笔记，那么马马虎虎的电池寿命和缺失的USB-A端口应该不是问题。

让我们谈谈积极的方面：稳定的机身，非常好的输入设备，优秀的键盘，非常好的屏幕（特别是校色后）和带有雷电3的USB-C。随着最新的四核CPU升级，这台二合一平板提供了与普通商用超级本相似的CPU性能水平，尽管这确实意味着风扇声音明显并且负载下的温度相当高。话虽这么说，X1 Tablet的i7选项不知道，在连续负载下比i5慢得多。

“通过完全重新设计的ThinkPad X1平板电脑，联想提供了一台非常好的商务用二合一平板电脑，进一步淡化了平板电脑和典型商务本之间的界限。然而，X1平板电脑并没有提供电池寿命方面的突破，而且可选的i7 CPU没有任何意义。”

在查看我们的评分时，我们发现竞品之间的界限越来越模糊。作为二合一平板，X1 Tablet的得分为89％。如果这款设备被评为办公室笔记本电脑或超极本，它将获得90％的评分，因为这两个类别都更加重视输入设备和接口选择——也就是ThinkPad X1 Tablet所擅长的两个类别。

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE - 10/17/2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
95%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
73 / 75 → 98%
Weight
72 / 20-75 → 94%
Battery
75%
Display
86%
Games Performance
47 / 78 → 60%
Application Performance
78 / 85 → 91%
Temperature
88%
Noise
94%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Camera
56 / 85 → 66%
Average
75%
88%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 (i5, 3K-IPS) 平板电脑评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-02- 8 (Update: 2019-02- 8)