Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Razr+智能手机评测--无线充电的高端可折叠手机

回归正轨。 摩托罗拉已经着手将折叠机最终带入主流。Razor+有一个新的和改进的折叠机制,一个巨大的封面屏幕--而且它最终支持无线充电。
5G Android ARM Foldable Smartphone
摩托罗拉Razr+

摩托罗拉Razr+的价格为1200美元,这不是一款便宜的智能手机,但它是一款特别的手机:你可以沿着它的短边把它折开,就像你在2000年代的传奇性Razr翻盖手机一样。其结果是一个6.9英寸的屏幕,与你通常的手机尺寸差不多。如果你把它折叠起来,那么你仍然可以使用3.6英寸的显示屏,并可以整齐地把折叠式手机塞进你的口袋。

在美国以外的国家,Razr+以摩托罗拉Razr 40 Ultra的名字销售。

摩托罗拉希望通过他们的多种合作和颜色变体的提供来吸引时尚的受众。它的无线充电功能和eSIM支持使这款手机成为一个全面的概念。那么,这是一款能让大家满意的智能手机吗?让我们拭目以待。

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (RAZR Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.90 inch 22:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 413 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, 2nd screen: 3.6", 1066x1056 pixel, 1.07 billion colours, P-OLED, capacitive touchscreen, HDR (HDR10+), 144Hz refresh rate, 360Hz sampling rate, 1100nits (maximum), glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 220 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78/​n79) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7 x 170.8 x 74
Battery
3800 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30 Watt charging, 5 Watt wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.5, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @2160p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP52-certified, e-SIM support, fanless
Weight
188.5 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87 %
06/2023
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
188.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"2640x1080
87 %
01/2023
Motorola Razr 2022
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
200 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
87.2 %
03/2023
Honor Magic Vs
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
261 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.90"2272x1984
87.9 %
10/2022
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2640x1080
86.3 %
12/2022
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
262 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.02"2160x1914

Razr+的外壳是一个很大的成功:手机放在口袋里比老式设备要整齐得多,因为它现在折叠在一起时只有1.5厘米的厚度。而且,它在打开时仍然保持稳定,手机的铰链几乎看不见了。沿着设备的中心仍然有相当明显的折痕--但不像旧型号那样严重。

这款手机有黑色和浅蓝色两种颜色,两种版本都有磨砂玻璃背面。

如果你正在寻找更多的东西,你也可以得到Viva Magenta颜色的手机,这是我们测试设备的颜色。它在浅红色和粉红色之间的混合是与潘通公司的色彩专家合作:Viva Magenta是2023年的年度颜色。只有这款手机的变体有一个人造皮革的背面。

Razr+只在有限的范围内防水和防尘:这款手机有IP52认证。因此,对灰尘和水滴的保护还是不错的。重量为188.5克,这款可折叠手机确实相当轻巧。

一个奇特的设计特点:Razr+有自己独特的香味,这是摩托罗拉与Firmenich的嗅觉专家合作开发的。在我们看来,这种香味并没有非常高质量的特点--如果有的话,它闻起来有点像廉价的沐浴露。但无论如何,这都是一个个人品味的问题。

摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+
摩托罗拉Razr+

尺寸比较

170.8 mm 74 mm 7 mm 188.5 g167 mm 79.8 mm 7.6 mm 200 g165.2 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g161.6 mm 144.7 mm 5.4 mm 262 g160.3 mm 141.5 mm 6.1 mm 261 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - 通常的存储尺寸和eSIM

对于目前的可折叠手机,256GB UFS 3.1存储空间和8GB内存是相当标准的。同时,你经常可以以1200美元的价格找到拥有更多或更快存储的手机。

这款手机没有微型SD卡插槽,只能容纳一个Nano SIM。如果你想使用双SIM卡,你仍然可以选择创建一个eSIM配置文件。

底部:麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
底部:麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
右边:待机按钮,音量摇杆,麦克风
右边:待机按钮,音量摇杆,麦克风
左边:SIM卡托盘
左边:SIM卡托盘

软件 - PureAndroid 13,有三个承诺的更新。

摩托罗拉手机交付时配备了Android 13,制造商承诺有三个大的版本更新和四年的定期安全补丁。我们就其他制造商更及时地发布补丁的能力联系了摩托罗拉--我们被告知,他们目前正在努力改善这种情况。积极的一面是:在测试时,最新的安全补丁是2023年5月的,意味着它是最新的。

一如既往,摩托罗拉确保安装一个相对纯粹的版本Android ,并且只包括一些他们自己的应用程序,提供诸如扩展手势控制等功能。该制造商还采用了ThinkShield for Mobile的一些安全功能,这些功能可以在屏蔽.摩托安全应用程序可以让你阻止不安全的WLAN连接,并创建特别保护的文件夹。

Razr+上也有Ready For,它可以让你轻松地以无线方式或用电缆将手机与电脑连接。然后,你可以将手机作为第二个屏幕或网络摄像头使用,你还可以通过共享剪贴板轻松发送文件。

摩托罗拉Razr+软件
摩托罗拉Razr+软件
摩托罗拉Razr+软件
摩托罗拉Razr+软件

通信和GNSS - 没有WiFi 7

摩托罗拉Razr+采用了WiFi 6E,这意味着该手机可以使用占用率较低的6GHz频段。不幸的是,这款手机还没有掌握尖端的WiFi 7。它的WLAN信号的全部范围在靠近路由器的地方就可以使用--十米之外,中间有三面墙,信号强度就会变弱一些。不过,在互联网上加载网页似乎仍然是超快的。

它的速度是相当不错的,最高可达1.3Gbit/s。虽然,这款手机的前身是电缆,可以实现稍好的价值,在我们的测试中,Razr+有时显得相当不稳定--至少在速度方面。

由于这款手机支持许多4G和5G频段,你可以在全球几乎任何地方使用它。在我们的测试中,这款手机的移动信号很好--与其他高端智能手机处于同一水平。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1315 (1162min - 1385max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
908 (886min - 924max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
808 (737min - 839max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
651 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1467 (1101min - 1534max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
927 (450min - 953max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 (858min - 945max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
687 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1536 MBit/s +14%
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1496 (1074min - 1634max) MBit/s +11%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1343 (863min - 1571max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s +63%
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1139 (927min - 1318max) MBit/s +36%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
835 (676min - 1018max) MBit/s
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1343 (863-1571)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (676-1018)
外面的GPS测试
外面的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

如果你把这个可折叠的智能手机带到外面,它的位置很快就能确定在大约3米之内。为了使手机能够做到这一点,使用了许多卫星网络,但不幸的是,它不能利用SBAS进行更精确的定位。

我们跳上自行车,所以我们能够收集一些使用Razr+的定位功能的实际经验--我们使用Garmin Venu 2智能手表作为比较设备。智能手机似乎显示了相当准确的位置--只是有时与我们的确切路线有一点偏差。如果你不需要依赖超级精确的位置确定,那么Razr+绝对可以满足日常导航的需要。

Garmin Venu 2位置测定 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2位置测定 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2位置确定--转折点
Garmin Venu 2位置确定--转折点
Garmin Venu 2 - Brücke的位置
Garmin Venu 2位置确定--桥梁
摩托罗拉Razr+位置确定 - 概述
摩托罗拉Razr+位置确定 - 概述
摩托罗拉Razr+位置确定--转折点
摩托罗拉Razr+位置确定--转折点
摩托罗拉Razr+位置确定 - 桥梁
摩托罗拉Razr+位置确定 - 桥梁

通话功能和通话质量--麦克风略微发闷

Razr+使用标准的谷歌电话应用程序,它支持VoLTE和VoWiFi。

通过手机的听筒可以很清楚地听到来电,尽管使用该设备的麦克风打出的电话听起来有一点闷响。你还必须确保说话声音不要太小。内置扬声器的最大音量只是刚刚够大,但你仍然可以很好地理解你正在说话的人。在这里,我们还必须确保说话的声音足够大,以保证我们的声音能够清晰地传输。

照相机 - 在良好的照明条件下,图像质量尚可

前置摄像头自拍
前置摄像头自拍
自拍主摄像头
自拍主摄像头

从设计上看,摩托罗拉已经着手确保盖板屏幕不会因为有两个不同大小的摄像头放置在上面而被破坏。因此,相反,两个大小完全相同的镜头占据了设备的左上方:一个是具有光学图像稳定功能的1200万像素主摄像头,另一个是1300万像素的超广角镜头,也可作为微距相机使用。

主摄像头可以拍出漂亮、饱和的照片--尽管白平衡相对较冷。当涉及到较小的细节时,iPhone 14Honor Magic4 Pro 的相机只提供了一点。在Apple 智能手机上拍摄的图像往往看起来更生动一些,因为它们具有更强的对比度水平。

由于缺少潜望镜变焦,Razr+的拍摄能力仍然有点不灵活。在低光照条件下,较暗的区域可以做得更亮一些--但总的来说,照片是相当清晰的。

广角镜头一般都能很好地完成其工作,较小的个别细节仍然清晰。

视频可以以最高4K和30帧的速度录制--在这里,相当多的其他高端手机已经开始提供更多,包括8K和60帧的视频录制。

由于它的外屏,你可以选择你想在哪个摄像头上自拍。还有一个慷慨的3200万像素的打孔摄像头位于内屏上--但不幸的是,它对光线不是很敏感。一般来说,在这些类型的摄像头上,4个像素通过像素分选进行组合,从而产生具有更好照明水平的800万像素图像。

以这种方式拍摄的自拍看起来几乎不比手机主摄像头拍摄的质量差。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera flowerMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle

在光线充足的摄影棚里,主相机提供了非常清晰的照片,甚至能够描绘出最小的细节。在照明强度只有1勒克斯的情况下,图片质量开始大幅下降--在这里,图像没有显示非常多的细节或具有良好的对比度。

ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: 11.19 ∆E min: 3.23 - max: 21.58 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
30 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
38 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
27 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: 32.27 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 47.73 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括一个硅胶套

这款手机配有一个30瓦的充电器,一条USB线,一个SIM卡工具和一个由两部分组成的硅胶壳,可以保护智能手机的两个外部部分,甚至还有颜色的搭配。

通过摩托罗拉的网站,你可以找到一个配套的汽车充电器,价格约为25美元--更换充电器的费用约为22美元。

制造商为在美国购买的设备提供12个月的标准保修期,可以通过他们的MotoCare服务额外延长12个月。服务。此外,还可以选择额外的事故保护--最好的计划包括3年的事故保护,费用高达300美元。

输入设备和操作 - 带有快速触摸屏的Moto手机

手机的主屏幕在1至165赫兹之间动态地适应其刷新率,这使你能够顺利地浏览系统,并在观看静态图像时节省能源。你还可以在封面显示器上获得高达144赫兹的快速刷新率。

由于手机的360赫兹触摸屏采样,这两个显示屏都可以快速操作,而且敏感度直达边角。一旦Razr+被打开,在外屏上运行的应用程序会无缝过渡到内屏上。这也适用于另一种情况--在这里,你只需点击手机上的一个按钮,指出你想继续在盖板屏幕上使用该应用程序,而不是将手机置于待机模式。

一个很好的特点是,铰链能够将手机固定在任何位置,这意味着Razr+基本上有一个内置的三脚架:你可以将其设置为帐篷模式,以便在外侧显示屏上观看电影,或者你可以将两个屏幕作为相机的取景器。同时,智能手机也可以半开使用,给你带来更好的稳定效果--基本上就像一台摄像机。

反过来,紧密的铰链确实意味着手机不是很容易用一只手折叠开。

键盘外部显示
键盘外部显示
键盘的主显示为横向显示
键盘的主显示为横向显示
键盘主显示器纵向
键盘主显示器纵向

显示屏 - 两个高质量的OLED屏幕

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
在最低亮度水平上防止闪烁
在最低亮度水平上防止闪烁

可折叠主显示屏的直径为6.9英寸,比例为22:9,比通常的智能手机屏幕要长一些,窄一些--在日常使用中,这应该不是问题。它的分辨率为2,640 x 1,080,与其他可比较的折叠式手机差不多。内容显示得很好,很详细,中间的折痕只有在有背光灯的情况下才能看到--不过,你肯定能感觉到它。

屏幕是一个P-OLED显示屏,这意味着个别像素可以完全关闭。理论上,除了环境光线和从侧面漏进来的光线外,这意味着这款手机应该能够完美地描绘出黑色。这也意味着它的对比度应该是令人难以置信的,使颜色发出漂亮而明亮的光芒。

另一方面,OLED屏幕没有任何形式的背光,你可以将其调暗,所以大多数OLED手机转向使用PWM--这意味着屏幕被快速关闭和打开,以使屏幕看起来更暗。这有时会导致对光线敏感的人出现一些问题。

在Razr+上,我们测量到相对较慢的PWM频率为103 Hz,这可能会进一步加剧这些问题。摩托罗拉提供了一种名为 "防止闪烁 "的模式,它在较低的亮度水平上大大减少了信号,并与刷新率相对应。

我们仍然建议对光线敏感的人在承诺购买手机之前在店内测试一下屏幕。

1) main display X-Rite i1Pro 2 2) outer display X-Rite i1Pro 2
917
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
982
cd/m²
915
cd/m²
928
cd/m²
979
cd/m²
912
cd/m²
929
cd/m²
983
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with main display X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 983 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 942.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 928 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.304
815
cd/m²
828
cd/m²
839
cd/m²
823
cd/m²
849
cd/m²
844
cd/m²
821
cd/m²
816
cd/m²
836
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with outer display X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 849 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 830.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 849 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.198
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.90
Motorola Razr 2022
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Honor Magic Vs
OLED, 2272x1984, 7.90
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
OLED, 2160x1914, 8.02
Screen
6%
11%
33%
33%
Brightness middle
849
500
-41%
803
-5%
795
-6%
1015
20%
Brightness
830
495
-40%
809
-3%
800
-4%
1022
23%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
97
1%
97
1%
98
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.02
1.99
34%
2.27
25%
1
67%
1.6
47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.61
5.37
29%
5.99
21%
2.5
67%
3.4
55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.3
2.7
49%
3.9
26%
1.5
72%
2.6
51%
Gamma
2.198 100%
2.202 100%
2.25 98%
2.37 93%
2.22 99%
CCT
6338 103%
6663 98%
6234 104%
6466 101%
6506 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 103 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 103 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 103 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度水平
最低亮度水平
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100 %的亮度
100 %的亮度

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

使用分光光度计,我们首先测量了手机在全白屏幕下的最大亮度:主显示屏达到了约1000cd/m²的结果。在APL18下,即只有18%的屏幕是白色的,我们测量的结果高达1100cd/m²。Razr+的外屏亮度约为100-150 cd/m²。

然后,我们检查了手机的色彩还原度。与色彩空间的最佳值相比,主屏幕显示的偏差很小。我们使用了图像模式 "自然",它略微减弱了明亮的颜色。棕色调的偏差最大--还有相当多的绿色调。封面屏幕的准确性稍差,但它仍然可以很好地描述颜色。

CalMAN灰度 - 主显示屏,自然
CalMAN灰度 - 主显示屏,自然
CalMAN颜色精度--主显示屏,自然
CalMAN颜色精度--主显示屏,自然
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB - 主显示器,自然
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB - 主显示器,自然
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB - 主显示器,自然
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB - 主显示器,自然
CalMAN色彩空间DCI P3--主显示器,自然
CalMAN色彩空间DCI P3--主显示器,自然
卡尔曼饱和度 - 主显示屏,自然
卡尔曼饱和度 - 主显示屏,自然
CalMAN灰度--封面显示,自然
CalMAN灰度--封面显示,自然
卡尔曼颜色精度--封面显示,自然
卡尔曼颜色精度--封面显示,自然
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB--封面显示,自然
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB--封面显示,自然
卡尔曼饱和度--封面显示,自然
卡尔曼饱和度--封面显示,自然

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在外面,主显示屏的反射率相当高,但在大多数情况下,内容仍然是相当清晰的。

事实证明,平坦的角度对手机来说不是问题:颜色保持相对真实的原貌,图像仍然清晰。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能--Razr+拥有强大的力量

Razr+的骁龙8+第一代来自高通公司的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1是一款超快的高端SoC--不过不是目前这一代的产品。对于大多数应用程序来说,它应该提供足够的动力,因为大多数程序员确保他们的应用程序可以在尽可能多的手机上使用。

根据基准测试,人工智能用途不是Razr+的强项--显然,这款手机还没有为此进行优化。除此以外,与其他智能手机和这个处理器相比,它显示的性能有一点降低--但这是在高水平上对它进行仔细检查。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1324 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1305 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1294 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=23)
1280 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1265 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -30%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
897 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4237 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=23)
4173 Points +6%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4106 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3987 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3921 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3782 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -24%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1784 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1271 - 1785, n=4)
1650 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points -28%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1271 Points -29%
Multi-Core
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4677 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (4025 - 4677, n=4)
4458 Points -5%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4025 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points -27%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057225 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=21)
997518 Points +5%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
950618 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
923552 Points -3%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
782013 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -22%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15443 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15101 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=22)
14796 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14611 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13195 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -22%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11296 Points -25%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1106 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=21)
1033 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
975 Points +30%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
911 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +12%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
749 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
8243 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=21)
7507 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7003 Points +10%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6349 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -9%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5642 Points -11%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
13563 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=21)
11842 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11275 Points +12%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10052 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -4%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8750 Points -13%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=21)
7549 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7541 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7342 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +15%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5461 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3871 Points -29%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
23875 Points +24%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
23174 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16742 - 26660, n=21)
21295 Points +11%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
19247 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18021 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -26%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1998 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=21)
1713 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1612 Points +5%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1538 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -3%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1291 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
82677 Points +458%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
73962 Points +399%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=19)
47040 Points +217%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +47%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14826 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8502 Points -43%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (887 - 128240, n=9)
29608 Points +3238%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +1910%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1201 Points +35%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1001 Points +13%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
887 Points

当涉及到图形性能时,我们的测试设备与采用相同SoC的对比设备相比经常落后。这可能是由于它在负载下严重节流--我们将在本评论的 "温度 "部分进一步讨论这个问题。即便如此,它仍然有足够的图形能力来运行几乎所有的应用程序而没有任何问题。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2798 Points +44%
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2745 Points +41%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2735 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2726 Points +40%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1947 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2867 Points +43%
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2811 Points +40%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2799 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2795 Points +40%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2001 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11201 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11022 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11004 Points +1%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10893 Points 0%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10853 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8167 Points
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8130 Points 0%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7433 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -2%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps +22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
354 fps +3%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
344 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps -9%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
238 fps +37%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps +21%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -15%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
146 fps +39%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
145 fps +38%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -8%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -27%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +32%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps +17%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +7%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -11%
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -23%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps +8%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -17%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +30%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps +15%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -23%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps 0%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -10%

互联网页面的加载速度很快,当你滚动时,图像通常已经加载完毕。在浏览器基准测试中,Razr+的表现一直很好。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)
148.098 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)
121.1 Points +20%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
111.449 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +6%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
100.523 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
76.341 Points -24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chome 114)
125 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)
111.4 runs/min -11%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -14%
Honor Magic Vs (Chome 111)
99.4 runs/min -20%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (chrome 105)
128 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)
111 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
98 Points
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
81 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Points -100%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points +16%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
138 Points
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -4%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
123 Points -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)
52566 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)
41373 Points +6%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
39146 Points
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
36606 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
29168 Points -25%
Motorola Razr 2022 (Chrome 108)
22761 Points -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -75%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
1530.8 ms * -68%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
1055.4 ms * -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)
1047 ms * -15%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
909.8 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)
855.35 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1内存的速度很快--但不再是最顶级的了。然而,由于可折叠智能手机的复杂构造,制造商往往不得不试图在某处节省一些成本,这意味着这对这种类型的手机来说是相当标准的,应该不会拖慢系统。

Motorola Razr 40 UltraMotorola Razr 2022Honor Magic VsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5GXiaomi Mix Fold 2Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-18%
-26%
7%
-19%
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB
1816.8
1768
-3%
1695.2
-7%
1598.77
-12%
1882.11
4%
Sequential Write 256KB
1352.6
1149
-15%
1296.5
-4%
987.09
-27%
1783.27
32%
1130 ?(452 - 1873, n=88)
-16%
Random Read 4KB
362
315
-13%
270.2
-25%
308.23
-15%
342.67
-5%
Random Write 4KB
472.3
332
-30%
300.1
-36%
245.94
-48%
446.48
-5%

游戏 - 你可以期待60帧的画面

在Razr+上玩游戏证明是没有问题的--毕竟屏幕可以显示高达165帧。

然而,你还必须找到一个为此而优化的游戏--大多数游戏可能只能以60帧的速度播放,例如《PUBG Mobile》或《Diablo Immortal》。我们使用GameBench的软件测量了可实现的帧率。.

并非总能以60帧运行游戏--我们只能在超高清下以40帧运行PUBG Mobile。市场上肯定有优化得更好的手机,但对于普通玩家来说,在Razr+上玩游戏仍然是一种有趣和愉快的体验。

某些比较简单的游戏甚至可以在手机的盖板屏幕上玩。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.6.0: Ø57.4 (51-61)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.6.0: Ø39.2 (33-41)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 1.8.4: Ø59.7 (56-61)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 1.8.4: Ø59.2 (47-61)

排放--Razr+变得火热而烦躁

温度

摩托罗拉Razr+不得不使用一个相对较薄的外壳,并配备了一台骁龙8+ Gen 1这款处理器以其在全负荷下的高温而闻名。这款手机的温度很快就能让人知道这一事实--在特别长的高强度计算过程中,温度可以上升到54.6℃(130.28°F)。

尽管你在日常使用中不太可能遇到这些极高的温度,但3DMark压力测试向我们展示了它们可能造成的后果:在该基准测试运行20次后,手机的初始性能只剩下44%。这意味着在长期高强度的计算之后,CPU可以被归类为中档机型--至少在性能方面是这样。

Max. Load
 53.6 °C40.6 °C32.2 °C 
 54.6 °C40.4 °C32.6 °C 
 54 °C37.4 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 54.6 °C
Average: 42 °C
31.6 °C40.5 °C47.2 °C
31.9 °C40.9 °C47.8 °C
32 °C42.3 °C48 °C
Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.6 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70.3 % +11%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.2 %
Motorola Razr 2022
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.1 % -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45.3 % -28%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % +117%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.6 % +59%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.4 % +28%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.9 %
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.31 (7.34-16.7)
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.1 (11.6-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.4 (9.59-17)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (15.9-16.7)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.1 (28.6-45.2)
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø39.7 (31.4-63.9)
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.5 (44.4-63.1)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.4 (29.3-64.7)
热图前沿
热图前沿
热力图返回
热力图返回

发言人

Razr+使用其听筒作为第二个扬声器,这可以帮助产生立体声效果。虽然,与手机底部的扬声器一起只能达到80dB(A)--不是一个特别令人印象深刻的结果。因此,尽管这款手机不能获得超强的音量,但至少可以产生清晰的声音,并有不错的低中音。

根据歌手的声音,一些音乐在全音量下听起来仍然有点令人不舒服的尖锐。

你可以通过USB-C或蓝牙连接外部音频设备。所有你可能希望的蓝牙编解码器(也许除了三星的可扩展编解码器)都可用,无论是aptX(高清、自适应、TWS+)、SBC、AAC、LHDC v4、LC3还是你正在寻找的LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.238.72537.538.33130.632.44034.532.95037.141.96330.944.78017.225.710020.230.412518.83616017.241.920012.145.725013.351.531512.655.640010.156.350010.560.163010.563.780012.964.2100011.667.9125015.469.2160011.470.920001170.4250011.370.331501265.1400012.965.7500013.469.4630014.166.7800014.962.51000015.757.71250016.565.11600017.356.3SPL25.379.7N0.644.7median 12.9median 63.7Delta2.57.74340.130.427.323.224.123.326.136.438.424.125.720.320.417.625.415.736.113.850.616.251.215.15612.65913.160.213.164.712.764.914.769.113.469.312.87112.874.112.873.813.277.213.777.213.976.613.176.213.975.813.372.71470.714.266.213.660.525.686.30.765.2median 13.6median 69.10.98.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Razr 40 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--最后的无线充电

消耗功率

在满负荷状态下,摩托罗拉Razr+并不是最节俭的设备,测量出的消耗量高达10.3瓦。另一方面,它在最小负荷下似乎也没有消耗多少。总的来说,Razr+给我们留下了一个混合的印象:它不能完全达到与超级节俭的三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G,但市场上肯定也有更耗电的设备。

使用提供的充电器,你可以用最大的33瓦特给手机充电。由于手机的电池不是最大的,只需要1:10小时就能充满电。最后,一个支持无线充电的Razr系列设备:通过Qi标准,最高可达5瓦特。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.3 Watt
Load midlight 5.5 / 10.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh
Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-36%
37%
3%
-25%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.3
-44%
0.56
38%
0.97
-8%
1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19)
-13%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.7
-55%
0.71
35%
1.37
-25%
1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19)
-70%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
2
-54%
0.79
39%
1.48
-14%
2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19)
-55%
Load Average *
5.5
7
-27%
3.59
35%
3.98
28%
5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19)
-3%
Load Maximum *
10.3
10.1
2%
6.45
37%
6.83
34%
8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19)
17%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.59 (0.854-10)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.898-1.231)

power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.2 (5.29-11.3)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.898-1.231)

运行时间

Razr+有一个3800毫安时的电池。这比它的前辈多出300毫安时,比三星的Galaxy Z Flip4.它的运行时间还算不错--当然,它们在任何方面都还是跟不上传统的智能手机。

如果你想使用相对较低的屏幕亮度上网,那么你可以从该设备中获得11:09小时。在满负荷的情况下,该手机仍能维持4:19小时。对于一个可折叠的手机来说,这些都是不错的结果,应该足以让你度过一天。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 19min
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh
Motorola Razr 2022
3500 mAh
Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-16%
7%
-2%
-15%
Reader / Idle
1422
1435
1%
H.264
1013
1089
8%
WiFi v1.3
669
565
-16%
756
13%
657
-2%
567
-15%
Load
259
271
5%

Pros

+ 高品质外壳
+ 稳定而灵活的铰链
+ 无线充电
+ 合适的运行时间
+ 大而明亮的封面显示
+ 良好的定位功能
+ 兼容eSIM
+ 相对轻巧和方便

Cons

- 昂贵的
- 温度升高
- 负载下明显的节流现象
- 缺乏高级功能,如WiFi 7
- 难以用手打开

评语 - 时尚和设计良好

摩托罗拉Razr+评论。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。
摩托罗拉Razr+评论。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。

随着Razr+的发布,摩托罗拉已经正面解决了可折叠手机的许多弱点--实际上在大多数情况下已经成功地控制了它们:它的铰链似乎非常稳定,当手机打开时几乎看不到,现在只在屏幕中间造成一个小折痕。同时,它的外壳保持得很薄,这意味着这款手机应该能够很容易地装进你的口袋里--带来熟悉的怀旧感,从可折叠手机的好日子开始。

下一个型号确实应该更容易打开--但就目前而言,紧密的铰链使许多不同的用途让人想起联想的Yoga笔记本电脑。

盖板屏幕已经大大增加,现在可以以更多方式使用--尽管不是所有的应用程序都与它兼容。这款手机明显更大的电池和无线充电支持很好地完善了其功能。

从另一方面看(考虑到手机的复杂结构),你不能不注意到,摩托罗拉似乎为大约1200美元的高价提供了一个有点过时的硬件:相机仍然缺少一个潜望式变焦,以获得更大的灵活性,而且手机的视频功能仍然是次优的。它的处理器很快,但也是去年的型号--此外,在Razr+的超薄外壳中,冷却似乎被证明是一个问题。

摩托罗拉Razr+是一款时尚的可折叠手机,在某些方面很好地克服了该概念过去的问题。然而,它的价格仍然很高。

在Razr+推出后,它的前辈--Razr 2022--的价格也很高。Razr 2022- 已经变得便宜了很多。去年的机型采用了相同的SoC,但盖板屏幕要小得多。如果你仍然犹豫不决,你可能想推迟到Galaxy Z Flip5的发布,根据一些传言,它仍然会在今年夏天到来。

价格和可用性

在测试时,摩托罗拉Razr+还不能在美国购买。然而,你可以在摩托罗拉的网站上注册注册,以便在开始预购时得到通知。

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - 06/12/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
89%
Games Performance
58 / 64 → 90%
Application Performance
82 / 86 → 96%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
79%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Razr+智能手机评测--无线充电的高端可折叠手机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-06-14 (Update: 2023-06-14)