摩托罗拉 Razr 40 评测：一款经济实惠的翻盖智能手机

Name: Motorola Razr 40
Brand: Motorola

是否在正确的领域进行了削减？ 小巧的外部显示屏、稍慢的 SoC 处理速度和一些高端功能的削减，使这款可折叠智能手机的售价低于 800 美元。摩托罗拉 Razr 40 填补了智能手机市场的空白，其时尚的外观可能会引起轰动。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/25/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM 5G Foldable Smartphone

Razr 是经典蛤壳式智能手机时代的一个著名品牌，摩托罗拉几年来一直在通过可折叠智能手机复兴这一品牌。与前几代产品一样，Razr 的折叠边缘较短。这样就可以采用其他设备所采用的智能手机显示屏格式，折叠后可轻松放入裤兜。

手机 Razr 40 UltraRazr 40 Ultra 的超大外部显示屏给人留下了深刻印象，非常适合自拍或快速回复信息。不过，摩托罗拉的 Razr 40 更经济，同时也更复古；像以前的蛤壳智能手机一样，只有一个小的外部显示屏，显示最重要的信息。同时，价格也大幅下降：Razr 40 的售价为 755 美元（通过亚马逊有绿色和奶油色两个版本），是目前最便宜的可折叠智能手机之一。

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Razr 40 (RAZR Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 644

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.90 inch 22:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 413 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, outer display: 1.5", 368x194 pixel, 16 Mio. colours, OLED, capacitive touchscreen, 1000nits (maximum), 277ppi, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 220 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 170.8 x 74

Battery

4200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30 Watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/1.7, phase comparison-AF, laser-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/30fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, Videos @2160p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), bumper, USB cable, charger, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP52-certified; 1x Nano-SIM, 1x eSIM; SAR 0.99W/kg Head, 1.37W/kg Body, fanless

Weight

188.6 g

Price

900 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.4 %	07/2023	Motorola Razr 40 SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	188.6 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.90"	2640x1080
87 %	06/2023	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	188.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.90"	2640x1080
87.9 %	10/2022	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	187 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2640x1080
87.2 %	03/2023	Honor Magic Vs SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	261 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.90"	2272x1984
87 %	01/2023	Motorola Razr 2022 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	200 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080

外壳 - 铝质和仿皮

该手机壳基于 Razr 40 Ultra 的坚固铰链设计，打开后难以辨别。根据对 Razr 40 Ultra 进行的首次耐用性测试，铰链也给人以稳定的感觉，但内部显示屏对划痕仍然很敏感。显示屏折叠处仍有折痕。这只有在背光下才能真正看到，在操作过程中也不会太麻烦，但还是很明显。

较小的外部显示屏在大猩猩玻璃 Victus 的保护下，使 Razr 40 的外壳更加坚固，并具有抗压和抗扭转性能。不过，该设备仅获得 IP52 级认证，因此无法保证良好的防尘和防水溅功能。

Razr 40 的重量与Razr 40 Ultra和 Razr 40 Ultra 重量相同，厚度略有增加，但其他尺寸相同。智能手机的正面和背面大部分采用了仿皮材质，给人一种非常高质感的感觉。可选颜色有鼠尾草绿、香草奶油 和夏日丁香，金属边框与颜色相匹配。
。

与更昂贵的同类产品一样，Razr 40 在开箱后也散发着与香水制造商 Firmenich 共同开发的全新 "摩托罗拉香味"。

尺寸比较

Motorola Razr 40 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Motorola Razr 2022 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Honor Magic Vs DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 闪存速度较慢

Razr 40 配有 8GB 内存和 256GB 大容量存储空间，存储量相当可观，但闪存速度比 Ultra 慢。Razr 40 没有 microSD 插槽，也没有第二个 SIM 卡插槽。另一方面，Razr 40 支持虚拟 SIM 卡，因此可以使用 nano 和 eSIM 卡进行双重操作。

同样，摩托罗拉只安装了一个 USB 2.0 端口，因此通过电缆向电脑传输数据的速度较慢，而且无法传输图像。因此，摩托罗拉与电脑或显示器的链接工具 Ready For 也只能通过无线方式工作。

软件 - 4 年更新

Razr 40 预装了Android 13，制造商延续了安装股票Android 的传统，没有自己的用户界面。智能手机上还有一些应用程序，其中捆绑了设备特定功能的所有设置，但除此之外，没有对股票Android 进行任何更改。除了 Facebook 之外，没有预装任何第三方广告应用程序。
。

在审查时，安全补丁是从 2023 年 6 月开始的，因此仍然是合理的最新版本。在 2027 年 6 月之前，即 4 年内，应该还会有更新。 Android 14 已经公布，制造商承诺总共会推出三款新操作系统。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 摩托罗拉 Razr 40，带 WiFi 6E

摩托罗拉 Razr 40 支持 WiFi 6E，因此没有任何限制。Razr 40 Ultra事实证明，我们的测试设备与华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时，数据传输更加稳定，而且由于 6 GHz 频率范围使用稀少，网络速度也非常快。

路由器附近的信号强度完全可用，在 10 米的距离和穿过 3 面墙时也没有任何变化。网页加载速度非常快。

移动网络的种类也很丰富。因此，除了单一的 5G 频率外，摩托罗拉 Razr 40 还可以像Razr 40 Ultra或其他高端智能手机一样，可以在全球范围内使用。在我们大约两周的评测阶段，城市环境中的移动信号接收始终非常稳定和稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1315 (1162^min - 1385^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	908 (886^min - 924^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=216, last 2 years)	646 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1467 (1101^min - 1534^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	927 (450^min - 953^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=217, last 2 years)	685 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s +4%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1496 (1074^min - 1634^max) MBit/s +1%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1483 (1278^min - 1583^max) MBit/s
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1343 (863^min - 1571^max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s +30%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1139 (927^min - 1318^max) MBit/s +8%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1050 (961^min - 1141^max) MBit/s
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	835 (676^min - 1018^max) MBit/s -20%

Motorola Razr 40; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1278-1583)

Motorola Razr 40; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1049 (961-1141)

跟踪模块可以接入所有主要的卫星网络，只要我们走出家门，就能很快确定我们的位置。精确度达到了三米，处于良好水平。

为了测试这款智能手机的实际跟踪能力，我们骑了一次自行车，并带上 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比设备。在地形开阔、路面较宽的地方，Razr 40 的定位非常准确，并能非常精确地绘制出路线。

在老城区狭窄的街道上，定位的精确度稍差。在这里，我们有时看起来像是沿着房屋墙壁刮擦，智能手机在桥上也会稍稍偏离轨道。

总体而言，定位精度非常高，因此 Razr 40 也可以推荐给对导航有较高要求的用户。

电话和语音质量 - 清晰明了

有趣的是，"电话 "应用程序是摩托罗拉基于Android 开源代码定制的应用程序。不过，其结构和功能与谷歌的标准应用程序非常相似。

通过听筒通话的音质非常清晰，即使说话声音很小，我们的声音也能通过麦克风清晰地传到对方耳中。通过扬声器和免提麦克风也可以很好地拨打电话，但用户在这里说话的声音不要太小。

相机 - 不算高端

与 Razr 40 Ultra 的广角镜头一样，背面也使用了 1300 万像素镜头。 Razr 40 UltraRazr 40 最重要的镜头是一个来自 OmniVision 的 6400 万像素传感器，它的感光度略低，但也配备了光学图像稳定器。

照片乍看色彩艳丽，亮度也不错，但仔细观察，照片的清晰度并不高，放大后的细节也略逊于高端智能手机的摄像头。尽管如此，Razr 40 的主摄像头还是能拍出非常漂亮的照片。暗光下的清晰度也不错，只是暗部可以再亮一些。

视频可以以最高 30 帧/秒的速度录制 4K，也可以以较低分辨率录制 60 帧/秒的视频。对于可折叠设备来说，录制视频的硬件质量并不高，即使在昂贵得多的设备中也很少能找到 8K。

Razr 40 主摄像头拍摄的视频效果非常好，但取景器在快速移动时偶尔会出现抖动，这在最终画面中并不明显。自动对焦的速度可以更快一些，但在没有快速移动的场景下，这一点不太明显。

广角摄像头拍摄的照片可用，甚至能捕捉到一些细节。

屏幕上有一个同样来自 OmniVision 的 3200 万像素镜头，可拍摄明亮的自拍照，图像质量良好，但在高倍放大时会出现轻微的网格。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flower Main camera - surrounding environment Main camera - low light Wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们还在照片实验室和受控条件下对主相机进行了测试。在全棚照明下，照片再次出现轻微模糊，均匀的表面经常出现一些斑点。

在仅有 1 勒克斯的光照条件下，测试图清晰再现。

ColorChecker Motorola Razr 40: 11.28 ∆E min: 3.23 - max: 21.58 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包装中的保险杠

我们很高兴摩托罗拉为 Razr 40 配备了充电器和保护套。

制造商为在欧盟购买的智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。其他地区的保修期可能有所不同，因此买家在购买前应仔细确认。

输入设备和操作 - 侧边的指纹传感器

屏幕的帧频最高可设置为 60 赫兹或 144 赫兹，并始终保持动态控制。该功能运行良好，操作非常流畅。触摸屏的刷新频率高达每秒 240 次（在游戏中甚至高达 360 次），并且在边角处非常精确。

与Razr 40 Ultra一样，单手打开 Razr 40 需要练习。这是因为铰链很紧，允许你以几乎任何姿势打开智能手机，这意味着你通常可以在没有三脚架的情况下自拍或合影。以 L 形打开时，屏幕的上下两部分可以显示不同的应用程序，例如，你可以在下部分写字，而音乐播放列表或视频则在上部分运行。

外部显示屏也是触摸感应式的，但由于其尺寸较小，在工作时很难派上用场。在这里，可以像在智能手表上一样检索信息，也可以进行简单的媒体控制。即使在锁定状态下，外部显示屏上的信息也始终可用。

指纹传感器位于待机键右侧，可以快速、可靠地解锁手机。此外还有面部识别功能，在手机打开和关闭状态下均可使用。不过，由于只能扫描二维图像，因此安全性不高。因此，Android 在手机锁定 4 小时后会阻止其使用。

显示屏 - 明亮、快速

Razr 40 的 OLED 主屏采用扩展全高清分辨率，平均亮度高达 1,002 cd/m²，色彩显示非常准确。

虽然我们注意到 PWM 闪烁，但可以通过直流调光模式来缓解。这样，闪烁就会变得更加均匀，并与刷新率的频率相匹配，从而让人感觉更加舒适。尽管如此，我们还是建议敏感人士在购买之前先在低亮度下试用一下屏幕。


973 cd/m²	991 cd/m²	1079 cd/m²
927 cd/m²	982 cd/m²	1086 cd/m²
938 cd/m²	992 cd/m²	1053 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 1086 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1002.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 982 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188

	Motorola Razr 40 P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.90	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.90	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.70	Honor Magic Vs OLED, 2272x1984, 7.90	Motorola Razr 2022 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Screen		-121%	-7%	-81%	-68%
Brightness middle	982	849 -14%	795 -19%	803 -18%	500 -49%
Brightness	1002	830 -17%	800 -20%	809 -19%	495 -51%
Brightness Distribution	85	96 13%	97 14%	97 14%	98 15%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.93	3.02 -225%	1 -8%	2.27 -144%	1.99 -114%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.52	7.61 -202%	2.5 1%	5.99 -138%	5.37 -113%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	5.3 -279%	1.5 -7%	3.9 -179%	2.7 -93%
Gamma	2.188 ^101%	2.198 ^100%	2.37 ^93%	2.25 ^98%	2.202 ^100%
CCT	6480 ^100%	6338 ^103%	6466 ^101%	6234 ^104%	6663 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

180.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 180.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 180.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

在使用光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行测量时，我们没有发现偏蓝现象，而且屏幕还可以很好地用于评估印刷色彩。为此，您应在设置中选择 "自然 "色彩配置文件。

OLED 的响应时间通常很短，这一点会让游戏玩家感到满意。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

显示屏的高亮度在户外也能发挥作用，即使是在明亮的日子里也不会有任何问题。可视角度也无可挑剔。

性能 - 足够日常使用

高通高通骁龙 7 代 1摩托罗拉 Razr 40 采用的高通骁龙 7 代 1 处理器的功耗明显低于高端智能手机采用的骁龙 8 代处理器。

不过，在日常使用中是否真正注意到这一点在很大程度上取决于个人的使用行为：运行非常复杂的应用程序（如照片编辑或视频编辑）、玩要求苛刻的游戏和运行大量后台进程的用户可能会注意到性能储备不太够。但如果你主要是上网、与朋友聊天或观看视频，Razr 40 的处理器完全够用。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Motorola Razr 2022 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1305 Points +68%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1294 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1265 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points +18%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	897 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (775 - 826, n=4)	793 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	775 Points
Multi-Core
Motorola Razr 2022 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	4106 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3987 Points +36%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3921 Points +34%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3782 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2854 - 3094, n=4)	2943 Points 0%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	2931 Points

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)	1390 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1038 - 1119, n=4)	1068 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	1056 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)	3840 Points +25%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	3064 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2601 - 3261, n=4)	2974 Points -3%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	950618 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	923552 Points +63%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	782013 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (544011 - 593635, n=5)	568349 Points 0%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	566018 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Razr 2022 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	15443 Points +26%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	15101 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14611 Points +19%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	12278 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (10389 - 12632, n=5)	11891 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)	11771 Points -4%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	11296 Points -8%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1106 Points +66%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	911 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +25%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	749 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (662 - 704, n=4)	683 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	667 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	8243 Points +75%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6349 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +23%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5642 Points +20%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4698 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4296 - 4795, n=5)	4622 Points -2%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	13563 Points +43%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10052 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	9463 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (8634 - 10067, n=5)	9335 Points -1%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8750 Points -8%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7541 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +29%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	5461 Points +12%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4859 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (3640 - 4970, n=5)	4468 Points -8%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3871 Points -20%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	23875 Points +213%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	23174 Points +204%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	19247 Points +152%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7612 - 8150, n=5)	7760 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	7630 Points
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1998 Points +44%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1538 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1330 - 1525, n=5)	1418 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	1389 Points
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1291 Points -7%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	82677 Points +742%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +122%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14826 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7374 - 29413, n=5)	12886 Points +31%
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	9816 Points
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8502 Points -13%

AImark - Score v3.x
Motorola Razr 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	47384 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (668 - 47384, n=4)	34697 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points -62%
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1001 Points -98%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	887 Points -98%

Razr 40 的显卡足以支持 1080p 游戏，至少能满足 30 fps 的要求。如果你想玩更高分辨率的游戏，实际上最好使用真正的高端 SoC，但你需要支付更高的费用。在图形处理能力方面，与旗舰设备的性能差距明显大于处理器单元。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2798 Points +236%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2745 Points +230%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2735 Points +228%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1947 Points +134%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	833 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2867 Points +245%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2811 Points +239%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2799 Points +237%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2001 Points +141%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	830 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11201 Points +256%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11004 Points +250%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10893 Points +247%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10853 Points +245%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3143 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8167 Points +159%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8130 Points +158%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7433 Points +136%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3148 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2458 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6731 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4855 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5780 Points +25%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4629 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4211 Points -9%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14418 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13986 Points +100%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7002 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10823 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9166 Points +46%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6286 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +7%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	110 fps
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -45%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	419 fps +183%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	354 fps +139%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	344 fps +132%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	148 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps +44%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	73 fps
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -18%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	238 fps +174%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	174 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	126 fps +45%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	87 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +105%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +58%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	146 fps +181%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps +87%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +97%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps +73%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps +147%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +87%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps +61%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +210%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps +195%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +176%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps +114%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +193%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps +173%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps +127%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82 fps +148%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps +130%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +91%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +79%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +193%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps +124%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +73%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +186%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +186%
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps +171%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +157%
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7 fps

即使在上网冲浪时，Razr 40 的骁龙 7在基准测试中的得分明显低于市场上最快的 SoC。尽管如此，网页打开速度非常快，而且在滚动时通常已经可以看到图片，所以这里的差异只是理论上的。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)	148.098 Points +28%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)	115.756 Points
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	111.449 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points -8%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)	100.523 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (64.3 - 115.8, n=5)	90.3 Points -22%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chome 114)	125 runs/min +79%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +54%
Honor Magic Vs (Chome 111)	99.4 runs/min +43%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)	69.7 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (61.5 - 87.4, n=5)	69.5 runs/min 0%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (chrome 105)	128 Points +86%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points +45%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)	98 Points +42%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	81 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (58 - 92, n=5)	77.8 Points +13%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)	69 Points

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)	138 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +26%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	123 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (106 - 114, n=2)	110 Points +4%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)	106 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)	52566 Points +53%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)	39146 Points +14%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	36606 Points +7%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)	34300 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (21143 - 34866, n=5)	29627 Points -14%
Motorola Razr 2022 (Chrome 108)	22761 Points -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1208 - 2686, n=5)	1574 ms * -30%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)	1208.2 ms *
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)	1055.4 ms * +13%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)	909.8 ms * +25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)	855.35 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

性能上的不足在存储方面更为明显：摩托罗拉 Razr 40 仍然使用较老的 UFS 2.2 闪存，而目前的高端智能手机已经使用 UFS 3.1 甚至 UFS 4.0 存储。因此，数据传输可能需要很长时间，加载时间也会更长。

	Motorola Razr 40	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G	Honor Magic Vs	Motorola Razr 2022	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		66%	23%	37%	41%	-14%	22%
Sequential Read 256KB	955.8	1816.8 90%	1598.77 67%	1695.2 77%	1768 85%	892 ?(482 - 1009, n=22) -7%	1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years) 58%
Sequential Write 256KB	804.3	1352.6 68%	987.09 23%	1296.5 61%	1149 43%	690 ?(369 - 913, n=22) -14%	1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years) 39%
Random Read 4KB	290.8	362 24%	308.23 6%	270.2 -7%	315 8%	219 ?(99.7 - 291, n=22) -25%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years) -15%
Random Write 4KB	257.5	472.3 83%	245.94 -4%	300.1 17%	332 29%	230 ?(99.2 - 301, n=22) -11%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years) 5%

游戏 - Razr 40 的最高帧速可达 60 fps

Razr 40 在测试的游戏中最高可达到 60 fps，不过在《PUBG Mobile》中需要较低的设置。暗黑破坏神：不朽》中最高可达到 46 fps。在大多数游戏中，您应该都能达到稳定的 30 帧/秒。帧频使用GameBench 软件套件进行测量。

Razr 40 并不是一款不折不扣的游戏手机，但它所提供的性能应能轻松满足休闲游戏玩家的需求。

Motorola Razr 40; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø44.8 (44-45)

Motorola Razr 40; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø59.6 (56-60)

Motorola Razr 40; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

Motorola Razr 40; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.0.2: Ø41.1 (36-45)

Motorola Razr 40; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.0.2: Ø44.6 (40-46)

排放物 - 长时间负载时发热

温度

在长时间高负荷运行的情况下，Razr 40 的外壳温度最高可升至 51.2 摄氏度。这种温度升高主要局限于某些位置，在日常使用中很少达到，但在高环境温度下玩游戏时，智能手机肯定会发热。

SoC 也会出现节流现象，但比其他可折叠手机要小得多。

Max. Load

Idle


51.2 °C	38.8 °C	32.3 °C
51.5 °C	40.6 °C	31.6 °C
50.8 °C	34.8 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 51.5 °C
Average: 40.4 °C


30.4 °C	34.2 °C	46.8 °C
30.6 °C	41.3 °C	43.8 °C
30.7 °C	42.2 °C	44.8 °C

Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 38.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 23.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.5 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	80.8 %
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	70.3 % -13%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63.2 % -22%
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49.1 % -39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45.3 % -44%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	84.9 %
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.6 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.4 % -34%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43.9 % -48%

Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.65 (4.22-4.97)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.31 (7.34-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.4 (9.59-17)

Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.1 (11.6-16.7)

Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.3 (15.2-18.8)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.1 (28.6-45.2)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.4 (29.3-64.7)

Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.5 (44.4-63.1)

Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø39.7 (31.4-63.9)

发言人

智能手机的听筒被用作第二个扬声器，因此打开时可与手机壳下缘的主扬声器一起产生立体声效果。扬声器的音量不大，但听起来非常清晰，能细致入微地再现音乐。

喜欢使用外接设备的用户可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙进行连接。蓝牙有多种编解码器可供选择：除了 aptX HD 或 LDAC 等标准外，还有 LC3 或 LHDC V3/V4 等（仍然）不同寻常的变体。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Razr 40 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Razr 2022 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 对于可折叠手机来说，续航时间不错

耗电量

Razr 40 是一款相当经济的可折叠智能手机，尤其是在负载情况下。这可能是由于它的最高性能较低，而在低负载情况下，它与对比设备的性能相当，甚至能耗更高一些。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Load	3.5 / 5.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Motorola Razr 40 4200 mAh	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 3800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G 3700 mAh	Honor Magic Vs 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-28%	19%	-66%	-62%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.9 -13%	0.56 30%	1.3 -63%	1.012 ?(0.74 - 1.23, n=5) -27%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.1 8%	0.71 41%	1.7 -42%	2.19 ?(1.2 - 4.44, n=5) -83%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Maximum *	1.4	1.3 7%	0.79 44%	2 -43%	2.3 ?(1.4 - 4.49, n=5) -64%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -16%
Load Average *	3.5	5.5 -57%	3.59 -3%	7 -100%	5.84 ?(3.33 - 11.2, n=5) -67%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -59%
Load Maximum *	5.5	10.3 -87%	6.45 -17%	10.1 -84%	9.26 ?(5.5 - 11.3, n=5) -68%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -51%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Razr 40; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.83 (0.662-5.54)

Motorola Razr 40; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.205 (1.086-1.357)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Razr 40; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.57 (3.27-5.03)

Motorola Razr 40; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.205 (1.086-1.357)

电池寿命

Razr 40 的电池容量为 4,200 毫安时，比 Razr 40 Ultra 的电池容量更大。Razr 40 Ultra或三星Galaxy Z Flip4.

这反映在可折叠手机的良好续航时间上，在我们的 WLAN 测试中达到了 12:23 小时。纵观所有智能手机，肯定有一些手机的续航时间更长。但是，即使在高强度使用的情况下，一次充电也能轻松完成一天的工作或学习。

智能手机的最大充电功率为 30 瓦。在电池完全耗尽后不到 1:30 小时，可折叠手机就能再次充满电。无线充电 Razr 40 Ultra一样，便宜的机型也可以使用无线充电功能。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		24h 12min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 34min

	Motorola Razr 40 4200 mAh	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 3800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G 3700 mAh	Honor Magic Vs 5000 mAh	Motorola Razr 2022 3500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-5%	-12%	1%	-24%
Reader / Idle	1452	1422 -2%		1435 -1%
H.264	1052	1013 -4%		1089 4%
WiFi v1.3	743	669 -10%	657 -12%	756 2%	565 -24%
Load	274	259 -5%		271 -1%

Pros

+ 对于翻盖智能手机来说相对便宜

+ 高质量外壳

+ 支持 eSIM

+ Android 库存，4 年更新

+ 快速、稳定的 WiFi

+ 适合全球使用

+ 精确的跟踪能力

+ 带直流调光功能的明亮屏幕

+ 无线充电

Cons

- 仅 USB 2.0 端口

- 在负载情况下明显发热...

- ......包括性能节流

结论 - 摩托罗拉展示了如何削减开支

摩托罗拉对 Razr 40 进行了一些痛苦但最终是正确的削减，以便能够提供一款相对便宜的翻盖和可折叠智能手机。

当然，755 美元的价格仍然偏高，但至少比 Razr 40 Ultra.作为回报，你必须牺牲大尺寸的外部显示屏，但那些只用它来查看通知的人会对较小的屏幕感到满意，摩托罗拉为它找到了一些巧妙的额外用途。闪存速度也稍慢一些。

对于铁杆游戏玩家和需要尽全力的用户来说，性能降低尤其明显，特别是在多任务处理要求较高的应用程序时。而对于其他人来说，他们则能获得一个适合日常生活的快速系统，它被装在一个时尚、稳定的机壳中，对于一款可折叠手机来说，它的超长运行时间给人留下了深刻印象。屏幕亮度高，Android ，更新时间长。

事实上，摩托罗拉只安装了一个 USB 2.0 端口，这已经是《Razr 40 Ultra》的一个问题了。 Razr 40 Ultra和 Razr 40 同样令人讨厌。Ready For只能通过 WiFi 工作，即使菜单中提供了有线连接。摄像头还不错，但不是高端水平。那些想购买照相智能手机的人肯定能在这个价位找到更好的选择。

作为一款经济型可折叠手机，摩托罗拉 Razr 40 配备了迷你外置显示屏，功耗稍低，但它填补了一个有趣的空白，同时看起来非常时尚。

价格 Razr 40 Ultra到目前为止价格几乎没有下降（亚马逊售价 1,049 美元），但仍不失为一款动力更强、外接显示屏更大的有趣选择。Z Flip4 Galaxy Z Flip4几乎没有更便宜的，所以 Razr 40 在其价格范围内（仍然）几乎是独一无二的。

价格和供应情况

摩托罗拉 Razr 40 在美国亚马逊上的售价为 755.00 美元，颜色为绿色和奶油色。

价格截至 2023 年 7 月 25 日，可能会有变动。

Motorola Razr 40 - 2023-07-24 07/24/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 76%

Weight

89%

Battery

90%

Display

93%

Games Performance

50 / 64 → 78%

Application Performance

75 / 86 → 87%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

77%

Average

80%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390604 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉 Razr 40 评测：一款经济实惠的翻盖智能手机

Florian Schmitt, 2023-07-25 (Update: 2023-07-25)

摩托罗拉 Razr 40 评测：一款经济实惠的翻盖智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 铝质和仿皮

尺寸比较

设备 - 闪存速度较慢

软件 - 4 年更新

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 摩托罗拉 Razr 40，带 WiFi 6E

电话和语音质量 - 清晰明了

相机 - 不算高端

配件和保修 - 包装中的保险杠

输入设备和操作 - 侧边的指纹传感器

显示屏 - 明亮、快速

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 足够日常使用

游戏 - Razr 40 的最高帧速可达 60 fps

排放物 - 长时间负载时发热

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Motorola Razr 40 audio analysis

Motorola Razr 2022 audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 对于可折叠手机来说，续航时间不错

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 摩托罗拉展示了如何削减开支

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare