三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G评测--一个紧凑的可折叠智能手机，有挥之不去的问题

Name: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Brand: Samsung

电池寿命仍有问题？ 这次有了骁龙8+第一代处理器和更大的电池，三星的小型可折叠机希望能解决其前代产品的最大问题：电池寿命差。在我们的评论中，找出为什么这款新机型只能部分解决这个问题。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/04/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Foldable Smartphone

与折叠4一样，今年的Flip机型依靠的是骁龙8+ Gen 1.Flip4的主要可折叠显示屏的屏幕尺寸为6.7英寸，分辨率为1080p，另外还有一个1.9英寸的外部屏幕。

基本型配有128GB的内部存储器，建议零售价为999.99美元，而配有512GB的顶级型号则为1179.99美元。Bespoke版仅在三星商店有售，它提供了通过不同的前后面板以及不同颜色的框架来个性化你的Flip4的外观的机会（1319.99美元）。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Galaxy Z Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.70 inch 22:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 426 PPI, Capacitive, Dynamic AMOLED , Cover display: 1.9 inch, 512x260, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 104 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, hall, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 165.2 x 71.9

Battery

3700 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 24mm, OIS, 1.8µm) + 12MP (f/2.2, 1.12µm, wide angle lens); camera 2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.4, 26mm, 1.22µm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual, USB cable, SIM tool, OneUI , 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value: 1.151W/kg Head, 1.198W/kg Body, GNSS: GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, Glonass, fanless, waterproof

Weight

187 g

Price

1099 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.9 %	10/2022	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	187 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2640x1080
86.3 %	09/2021	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	183 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2640x1080
86.1 %	03/2022	Huawei P50 Pocket SD 888 4G, Adreno 660	190 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.90"	2790x1188
88.6 %	09/2022	Asus Zenfone 9 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	169 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.90"	2400x1080
89.3 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080

外壳 - 三星智能手机，有一个冲孔

Galaxy Z Flip4的外观与它的前代产品几乎完全相同。前代产品几乎一样.然而，根据三星的说法，铰链已经瘦了下来，屏幕之间的连接也被拉直了。非常高质量的外壳，由于IPX8等级，可以防止水渍，由康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus+和称为 "铠甲铝 "的特别硬的铝合金制成。由于玻璃的磨砂处理，指纹很难被发现。

可折叠的OLED显示屏周围的边框，本身由三星自己的超薄玻璃保护，似乎比Flip3上的更窄。掀翻3.从数字上看，屏幕几乎占了正面的86%--不过这更符合中档手机而不是旗舰设备的要求。屏幕还提供了一个非常耐看的保护膜。这个屏幕保护膜的感觉相当好，而且不能被移除。

尺寸比较

Huawei P50 Pocket Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Asus Zenfone 9 Samsung Galaxy S22 DIN A6 ❌

特点 -Galaxy Z Flip4配备了UFS存储空间

3,700毫安时的电池通过一个USB 2.0 Type-C接口充电，可以通过USB-OTG识别外部外设。还支持通过Miracast无线传输到外部显示器。

Flip4中没有microSD卡插槽。然而，这款双SIM卡智能手机有一个NFC芯片，用于三星和谷歌支付，以及蓝牙5.2。

软件 - Flip4带有Android 12

像往常一样，三星将Android 与自己的用户界面OneUI版本4配对。在这次审查时，后者是OneUI 4.1.1，仍有2022年7月的安全补丁。在最好的情况下，Flip4将收到更新，直到Android 16，因为Galaxy Z家族应该享有长达四代的操作系统更新和五年的安全补丁。

通信和GNSS - 具有5G功能的三星智能手机

这款三星可折叠式产品在家庭网络内的数据传输率相当高，但WiFi模块只在2.4和5GHz范围内与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器进行通信。Flip4无法达到Fold4的WiFi 6E（理论上）所能达到的高速度。

访问LTE网络，包括各种支持的4G频率，是有保证的，而且还可以使用快速的5G频谱。与它的前辈一样，在德国可用的快速毫米波标准，不幸的是，Flip4可以使用。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	919 (892^min - 936^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	908 (886^min - 924^max) MBit/s
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	766 (735^min - 796^max) MBit/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	763 (386^min - 780^max) MBit/s -16%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=210, last 2 years)	654 MBit/s -28%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	938 (470^min - 957^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	927 (450^min - 953^max) MBit/s
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	824 (425^min - 859^max) MBit/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	823 (418^min - 852^max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=211, last 2 years)	690 MBit/s -26%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1715 (801^min - 1773^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1602 (797^min - 1629^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	816 (736^min - 883^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	800 (421^min - 886^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø907 (886-924)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (386-780)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø912 (450-953)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø809 (418-852)

我们通过实际的骑行测试来检验位置跟踪的准确性。我们的短途旅行是用Garmin Venu2作为对比设备平行记录的。Flip4偶尔会缩短曲线，尽管GPS结果的变化仍然相当小。不像折叠4然而，Flip型号只使用单频GPS。

电话和通话质量--双SIM卡的三星手机

Flip4的通话质量并不突兀。声音非常清晰地传来，在线路的另一端被描述为非常清晰。还支持eSIM、WiFi通话和VoLTE。在我们的测试中，通过内置的前置摄像头与Skype进行视频通话是没有问题的，而且由于采用了柔性模式，不需要支架。

照相机 -Galaxy Z Flip4，带双摄像头

由于Flip4的可折叠外形，可以使用主摄像头拍摄照片和视频。内置的1000万像素摄像头在自拍时也非常稳定，但拍出来的照片有点苍白，而且往往有点曝光过度。

背面的双摄像头设置配备了两个传感器，分辨率分别为1200万像素，不过光学图像稳定功能只在广角镜头上提供。Flip4的新相机传感器来自于Fold3的传感器，应该比Z Flip3 5G上的传感器要亮65%。 Galaxy Z Flip3 5G.三星的小型折叠机仍然不是处理低光的专家，尽管在低光情况下的照片和视频比其前辈拍摄的照片略好。在白天用广角镜头拍摄的照片在我们看来很不错。我们用ColorChecker Passport进行的分析也证实，该手机的摄像头具有非常合理的色彩保真度，但绿色调除外。

在我们看来，Flip4的1200万像素超广角摄像头可以更清晰地显示物体，并提供更多细节。不幸的是，这款三星手机缺乏8K视频选项。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra wide-angle Zoom 5x Low Light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

Vivo X80 Pro

Honor Magic 4 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

Vivo X80 Pro

Honor Magic 4 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

Vivo X80 Pro

Honor Magic 4 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

Vivo X80 Pro

Honor Magic 4 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

Vivo X80 Pro

Honor Magic 4 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G: 8.76 ∆E min: 2.5 - max: 19.51 ∆E

配件和保修 - Flip4没有电源适配器

三星没有为其可折叠智能手机提供电源适配器，尽管它提供了一条USB线和信息手册。

保修期为自购买之日起24个月。三星Care+再次包含在购买时，为期一年，在此期间只限于一次索赔。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的三星智能手机

Flip4得益于清晰的振动马达，在操作过程中120赫兹的主屏幕的高刷新率，以及1.9英寸的外部显示器，它与Flip3的相似，以60赫兹运行。前面的小屏幕也可以用来用主摄像头拍照，由于新的快速拍摄功能，拍照效果得到了改善。通知可以在小屏幕上查看，但不能发送回复。

内置在电源按钮上的指纹传感器反应迅速，能准确识别注册的指纹。然而，位置太高了，导致解锁Flip4时的握持感很尴尬。在解锁手机时，通过人脸识别进行生物识别，也可以通过冲孔摄像头实现。

显示器 -Galaxy Z Flip4 with AMOLED

Flip4的可折叠6.7英寸LTPO-AMOLED显示屏具有22:9的纵横比，自适应刷新率为10至120赫兹，分辨率为2640 x 1080像素，这意味着该手机的像素密度很高，超过400PPI。然而，看一下开发者设置就会发现，屏幕只降到最低的24赫兹。由于Fold4也同样受到影响，我们推测这是由三星的一个内置软件限制造成的。

最大屏幕亮度很好，平均为800cd/m²，但 Galaxy Z Flip3在我们的测量中实现了一个略高的数值。更加现实的APL18水平也略低于其前辈的1093cd/m²。

像所有OLED一样，这款三星手机的屏幕也会闪烁。在最低亮度水平下，显示屏的恒定PWM为120赫兹，在此之上，振幅曲线为240赫兹，但就像永久直流调光一样稳定。


810 cd/m²	787 cd/m²	790 cd/m²
814 cd/m²	795 cd/m²	794 cd/m²
812 cd/m²	795 cd/m²	799 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 814 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 799.6 cd/m² Minimum: 0.97 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 795 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.70	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.70	Huawei P50 Pocket Foldable OLED, 2790x1188, 6.90	Asus Zenfone 9 AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.90	Samsung Galaxy S22 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Screen		-18%	-8%	-30%	-22%
Brightness middle	795	832 5%	780 -2%	793 0%	853 7%
Brightness	800	842 5%	768 -4%	796 0%	858 7%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	96 -1%	97 0%	96 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	1.9 -90%	1.1 -10%	1.9 -90%	1.9 -90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.5	3.3 -32%	3.1 -24%	3.4 -36%	3.2 -28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.4 7%	1.6 -7%	2.3 -53%	1.9 -27%
Gamma	2.37 ^93%	2.1 ^105%	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	6466 ^101%	6453 ^101%	6483 ^100%	6860 ^95%	6460 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在设定的变焦水平下，使用不同的亮度设置进行的一系列测量

在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试中，手机的OLED显示屏似乎得到了很好的校准--不过，在洋红色区域可以看到轻微的偏差。DeltaE值在理想范围内（<3），色温在6,500K左右，非常准确。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7865 ms rise
1.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7325 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7205 ms rise
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.687 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

日光对Flip4不构成任何问题--至少在主显示屏方面是这样。在屏幕保护膜上可以看到令人不安的反射，但反射只是稍微限制了可读性，而且是在阳光直射下。另一方面，小的外部面板在户外不太容易阅读；我们在测试中不得不寻找阴凉处来阅读外部面板，或者用另一只手主动遮挡面板。

由于内置OLED技术，主屏幕和外屏幕的可视角度都非常好。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的Flip4

在日常使用中，Flip4的运行非常流畅，几乎没有打嗝，这要归功于骁龙8+第一代.系统性能非常好，应用程序的加载时间也很短。在我们的基准测试中，高通SoC真正展示了其出色的性能，但三星手机的表现略低于华硕Zenfone 9.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1322 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=23)	1280 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1265 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1145 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1107 Points -12%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	1099 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	4436 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=23)	4173 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3987 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3474 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	3471 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points -25%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	2944 Points -26%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1081005 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=21)	997518 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	923552 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	813746 Points -12%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	784775 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	636471 Points -31%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	16528 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 17727, n=22)	14796 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14611 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	14068 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	12374 Points -15%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	11897 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11787 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1163 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1106 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=21)	1033 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	957 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points -24%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8273 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	8243 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=21)	7507 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6991 Points -15%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	6265 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	5908 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points -30%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	13563 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	12637 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=21)	11842 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	11319 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11210 Points -17%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	10283 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points -29%
Memory
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8263 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=21)	7549 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7541 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	6493 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6413 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	6208 Points -18%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	23875 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	22938 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16742 - 26660, n=21)	21295 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17269 Points -28%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	14837 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	9399 Points -61%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1998 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1982 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1924 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1845 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=21)	1713 Points -14%
Huawei P50 Pocket Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288	1554 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points -25%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	82677 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	82462 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=19)	47040 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points -74%

AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +213%
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	7208 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6765 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6487 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1043 - 7865, n=11)	6385 Points -6%

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2798 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2698 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1855 Points -34%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1077 Points -62%
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2867 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2754 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1946 Points -32%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1253 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1236 Points -57%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11201 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11087 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7458 Points -33%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4542 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3959 Points -65%
Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7064 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4677 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3958 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps -2%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -48%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	381 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	354 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps -15%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	202 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	175 fps -51%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +13%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -14%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -46%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	193 fps +53%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	176 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	126 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	107 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps -17%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +45%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -22%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -40%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +27%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -23%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -37%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -33%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -35%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -28%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -28%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -48%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -15%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -44%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -32%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -48%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -6%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps -35%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)	148.098 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	147.648 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)	121.1 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	96.4 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)	111.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	111 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min
Asus Zenfone 9	102 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	146 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (chrome 105)	128 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)	111 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points -22%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	168 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)	159.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93)	156 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	149 Points
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1)	101 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	54646 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)	52566 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)	41373 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	38992 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93)	36969 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points -36%
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1)	21748 Points -59%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1)	1938 ms * -127%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -86%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	1566 ms * -83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)	1047 ms * -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93)	950 ms * -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)	855.35 ms *
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)	768.66 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G	Huawei P50 Pocket	Asus Zenfone 9	Samsung Galaxy S22	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-8%	-1%	41%	-3%	-11%	-1%
Sequential Read 256KB	1598.77	1620 1%	1839 15%	1986.97 24%	1486 -7%	1599 ?(1030 - 3134, n=56) 0%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) -6%
Sequential Write 256KB	987.09	750 -24%	575 -42%	1776.21 80%	993 1%	777 ?(233 - 1332, n=56) -21%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 13%
Random Read 4KB	308.23	276.6 -10%	263.5 -15%	298.46 -3%	273 -11%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=56) -21%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) -20%
Random Write 4KB	245.94	250.6 2%	342.1 39%	398.39 62%	257.6 5%	245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=56) 0%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 11%

排放 - 三星手机保持凉爽

温度

Flip4的外壳只是在负载下略有升温。尽管如此，这款手机在3DMark压力测试中显示出强烈的性能下降。我们在测试中没有观察到系统过热的情况，尽管我们确实注意到有超过50%的节流。

Max. Load

Idle


32.5 °C	33 °C	30.3 °C
33.4 °C	32.9 °C	29.5 °C
32.8 °C	33.2 °C	28.9 °C

Maximum: 33.4 °C
Average: 31.8 °C


28 °C	31.1 °C	31.3 °C
28.2 °C	30.1 °C	32.3 °C
28.8 °C	31.3 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 32.7 °C
Average: 30.4 °C

Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 % +94%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.3 % +31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.4 % +25%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.1 % +17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45.3 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 % +77%
Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 % -1%
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52.8 % -6%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.4 (9.59-17)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.49 (5.48-5.5)

Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø5.08 (4.31-7.57)

Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.3 (8.84-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.78 (6.63-11.8)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.4 (29.3-64.7)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.1 (20.8-23.7)

Huawei P50 Pocket Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.1 (16-26.9)

Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.8 (33.4-62.9)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.2 (23.6-41.9)

发言人

与它的前辈相比，扬声器的变化不大。前代产品.与Flip4的薄型设计相比，这两个扬声器非常好，尽管高音部分有点下降。然而，中音在音频频谱中是相当线性的。

对于那些想要无线声音的人，可以使用蓝牙编解码器SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC。有线耳机解决方案可以通过USB-C端口实现。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G智能手机

消耗功率

Flip4的电池容量为3700毫安时，比前代产品略大。该电池可以通过无线和有线方式充电，尽管在这两种情况下都不是特别快。同样，功率也增加到了25瓦，其中感应式充电的功率被限制在10瓦。也可使用5瓦的无线电源共享。

闲置时的功耗非常低；在负载下，功耗处于禅风9的水平。骁龙8+ Gen1.与Fold4类似，Flip4在GFXBench中显示功耗急剧下降，（可能）是由于节流。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.29 Watt
Idle	0.56 / 0.71 / 0.79 Watt
Load	3.59 / 6.45 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G 3700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G 3300 mAh	Huawei P50 Pocket 4000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-2%	-97%	-39%	-56%	-98%	-71%
Idle Minimum *	0.56	0.46 18%	1.33 -138%	1.01 -80%	0.69 -23%	1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19) -81%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -60%
Idle Average *	0.71	0.74 -4%	1.77 -149%	1.1 -55%	1.19 -68%	1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19) -163%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -105%
Idle Maximum *	0.79	0.78 1%	1.89 -139%	1.17 -48%	1.26 -59%	2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19) -156%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -106%
Load Average *	3.59	4.73 -32%	4.25 -18%	3.3 8%	6.97 -94%	5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19) -58%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -55%
Load Maximum *	6.45	5.89 9%	9.19 -42%	7.89 -22%	8.85 -37%	8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19) -33%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -29%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø4.4 (0.817-10.6)

Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.49 (1.232-9.94)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.52 (2.88-7.03)

Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.63 (8.51-8.94)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.779 (0.705-1.369)

Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.973 (0.905-1.632)

电池寿命

在我们的实际WiFi测试中，在调整了150cd/m²的显示亮度后，电池寿命非常不同。虽然Flip4的续航时间（8小时56分钟）与Flip3的续航时间几乎相同。浏览器的Flip3在使用三星自己的浏览器时，我们测得的续航时间明显比使用Chrome浏览器时好11小时。这些运行时间可能由于自适应刷新率的不同而不同，但我们在浏览器脚本中看不到赫兹值的任何差异。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		10h 57min

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G 3700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G 3300 mAh	Huawei P50 Pocket 4000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	657	541 -18%	482 -27%	825 26%	675 3%

Pros

+ 美丽的OLED显示屏

+ 优秀的制造质量

+ 防水的可折叠设计

+ 良好的立体声扬声器

+ 一个强大的SoC...

Cons

- ...有严重的节流现象

- 只有单频GPS

- 屏幕亮度没有改善

- 没有WiFi 6E

- 触摸及的按钮

- 难以触及的按钮

判决书

由于其折叠后的小尺寸，Galaxy Z Flip4是一个非常有趣的替代较小的标准手机，如华硕Zenfone 9或三星自己的 Galaxy S22.这款手机壳给人留下了很好的印象，而且性能也很好。由于采用了骁龙8+1代，与高质量的加工和漂亮的可折叠OLED显示屏一样有吸引力。然而，有点令人失望的是，相对于Flip3来说，亮度较低。我们本来希望在这方面能有类似于Fold4的升级。

鉴于Flip4极具竞争力的价格，任何真正喜欢折叠机制的人都应该仔细看看这款三星折叠机。

我们不得不再次对三星的按键位置提出批评，这些按键仍然太高了--即使是手大的人也会发现用正常的握法不可能够到指纹识别器，这成为每天的挫败感。与Fold系列相比，缓慢的USB连接和限制（不支持笔的使用，没有双频GPS，没有WiFi 6E，也没有UWB）也很明显。

前代产品的最大弱点，即有限的电池寿命，似乎已经被三星解决了--至少部分解决了。电力用户仍然无法在一次充电中度过一天，考虑到缓慢的快充技术，这尤其成问题。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G的起始建议零售价为999美元，从亚马逊,百思买或其他类似零售商。

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G - 2022-09-30 09/30/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

49 / 70 → 70%

Weight

89%

Battery

89%

Display

93%

Games Performance

58 / 64 → 90%

Application Performance

92 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

77%

Average

82%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Henrique Valim - Translator - 10 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G评测--一个紧凑的可折叠智能手机，有挥之不去的问题

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-10- 4 (Update: 2022-10- 4)

三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G评测--一个紧凑的可折叠智能手机，有挥之不去的问题

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 三星智能手机，有一个冲孔

尺寸比较

特点 -Galaxy Z Flip4配备了UFS存储空间

软件 - Flip4带有Android 12

通信和GNSS - 具有5G功能的三星智能手机

电话和通话质量--双SIM卡的三星手机

照相机 -Galaxy Z Flip4，带双摄像头

配件和保修 - Flip4没有电源适配器

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的三星智能手机

显示器 -Galaxy Z Flip4 with AMOLED

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的Flip4

排放 - 三星手机保持凉爽

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G智能手机

消耗功率

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决书

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare