Notebookcheck
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate评论--游戏智能手机中的收藏品

ROG粉丝电话。 ROG Phone 5 Ultimate是该系列的先锋,也是唯一可以利用18GB工作内存的机型。背面的单色Vision显示屏应该是散发着一种优雅的气息,背面的感应键扩展了游戏控制。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Gaming Smartphone Thunderbolt Android
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate (ROG Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
18432 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.78 inch 20.4:9, 2448 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capazitive, 300 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, 24.3 ms Touch Latency, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerator, E-Compass, Proximity, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic sensors for AirTrigger 5 an grip press detection, Rear Touch
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700, 1800, 2100 MHz), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 172.83 x 77.25
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Sony IMX686, 1/1.7", f/1.8, PDAF) + 13 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.4, 125°) + 5 MPix (Macro, f/2.0); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 65W-Charger, USB-Cabel, Plastic Case, AeroActive Cooler 5, ROG UI, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
239 g, Power Supply: 193 g
Price
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
ratingversion
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.7 %7
09/2021
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
87.4 %7
04/2021
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
259 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.92"2460x1080
86 %7
08/2021
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
SD 870, Adreno 650
210 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.8 %7
03/2021
Asus ROG Phone 5
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
239 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080

案例、设备和操作

乍一看,华硕ROG手机5终极版很难与 标准变体因为尺寸和颜色方案是相同的。然而,虽然ROG Phone 5的背面有一个点状RGB矩阵,但Ultimate在那里有一个ROG Vision显示屏。像 专业型,这可以显示较小的动画,也与智能手机的互动有关。然而,Ultimate没有彩色显示屏,而是一个单色的PMOLED,看起来应该很精致。

背面还有两个额外的电容式感应键,可以识别刷卡动作。由于设计元素在这一点上被刻在了玻璃上,所以可以很好地识别这些触觉。加上超声波键AirTrigger 5和AeroActive Cooler 5的摇杆键,ROG Phone 5 Ultimate因此有六个额外的输入键。

Ultimate与它的兄弟姐妹们共享强大的功能。除了用于连接风扇的Pogo PIN,旁边还有一个USB 3.2端口(第2代,最高10GBit/s,支持HDMI和dP,最高UHD,QC 5.0),底部边缘还有一个USB 2.0端口(QC 3.0),可用于游戏时供电。此外,一个带有高保真音频DAC的音频插孔也在机上。

使用带有内部ROG UI的操作系统Android 11。那些不喜欢它的人可以在设置过程中切换到标准UI,这非常接近于一个纯粹的Android 。

所有现代标准都用于移动数据连接,支持LTE和5G的频段数量在终极版中再次增加。Wi-Fi 6E是一种快速的WLAN标准,可以通过双WLAN同时连接到两个网络,在与Netgear Nighthawk AX12的测试中实现了高而稳定的数据速率。

ROG手机的语音质量确实很好,拿在耳边时能提供非常好的清晰度,只有在非常大的环境噪音中才能达到极限。扬声器模式略有混响,但具有良好的麦克风范围和质量。这款华硕智能手机可以接受两张nano-SIM卡,并支持VoLTE。

ROG Phone 5不仅有高达144赫兹的刷新率,而且300赫兹的触摸采样率也非常高,有望在触摸屏上快速实现输入,延迟为24.3毫秒。在生物识别安全方面,显示屏上有一个光学指纹扫描仪,它的识别率相当可靠,但不是最快的之一。二维人脸识别也是可能的。

头部一侧
左边
对
底部边缘

Size comparison

176 mm 78.5 mm 9.9 mm 259 g172.83 mm 77.25 mm 9.9 mm 239 g172.83 mm 77.25 mm 9.9 mm 239 g169.86 mm 77.19 mm 9.8 mm 220 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Wi-Fi 6E
1318 (1273min - 1386max) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Wi-Fi 6E
1238 (643min - 1325max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1129 (1030min - 1155max) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (620min - 697max) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
953 (717min - 1469max) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
789 (660min - 853max) MBit/s ∼83% 0%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Wi-Fi 6E
788 (735min - 867max) MBit/s ∼83% 0%
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Wi-Fi 6E
788 (752min - 806max) MBit/s ∼83%
07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350142579278480278679578879077080380379779480077678480278980679579178078579578480276076078275375212681411146914681463140813069867178528547668158117678278068287668098328058067588268378538277977897927848027867957887907708038037977948007767848027898067957917807857957848027607607827537521268141114691468146314081306986717852854766815811767827806828766809832805806758826837853827797789128313861330132112731330130312931309131013121304129212861316131713161330130213401333133313381336132813051329133213351327112211391136103011001149114911211131112811471124111711551104115011461121115411171114113311201143114111341123114911361131Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø787 (752-806)
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (717-1469)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1318 (1273-1386)
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1129 (1030-1155)

照相机 - 不是终极的,但却很坚固

与ROG Phone 5 Ultimate的自拍
与ROG Phone 5 Ultimate的自拍

华硕的ROG Phone 5 Ultimate的相机设置与它的姐妹机型相比没有变化。背面的三个镜头由熟悉的索尼64MP传感器、一个超广角镜头和一个微距镜头组成。主摄像头的成像性能很好,高分辨率允许有用的放大,即使没有光学变焦。

前置摄像头的自拍效果也很好,只是逆光拍摄显示出无法通过算法进行补偿的烧毁区域。

前置摄像头以全高清(最高60FPS)记录视频,后置摄像头则以8K(最高30FPS)记录。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
10 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
0 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate: 7.53 ∆E min: 0 - max: 12.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
49.9 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
57 ∆E
50.4 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
36 ∆E
28 ∆E
59 ∆E
59.4 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
66.8 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
50 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate: 43.15 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 67.44 ∆E

显示屏 - ROG Phone 5 Ultimate中明亮的144赫兹AMOLED显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate的AMOLED显示屏与其他两个版本的显示屏相同。它的尺寸为6.78英寸,采用全高清Plus分辨率,最高频率为144Hz。该面板达到806 cd/m²,采用纯白色显示,并启用环境光传感器。随着明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布(APL50),它是1,088 cd/m²,APL10是1,136 cd/m²。那些手动调整亮度的人有488 cd/m²可供他们使用。

如果你对OLED闪烁很敏感,你可以使用直流调光模式,但你将不得不使用60赫兹。

794
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
806
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
792
cd/m²
787
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 806 cd/m² Average: 794.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5.05 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 789 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
AMOLED, 2460x1080, 6.92
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.80
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Response Times
-30%
-12%
-165%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
8 ?(5, 3)
-233%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-0%
11 ?(5, 6)
-358%
Response Time Black / White *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
6 ?(3, 3)
-150%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-0%
6 ?(3, 3)
-150%
PWM Frequency
144.5 ?(100)
568.2
293%
90.58 ?(100)
-37%
162.3
12%
Screen
-77%
-139%
-115%
Brightness middle
789
463
-41%
714
-10%
676
-14%
Brightness
795
466
-41%
705
-11%
669
-16%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
96
-2%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
3.24
-131%
5.9
-321%
5.77
-312%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3
5.75
-92%
8.7
-190%
9.81
-227%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.4
-159%
6.8
-300%
3.7
-118%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.201 100%
2.25 98%
1.959 112%
CCT
6596 99%
7273 89%
7774 84%
6584 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-54% / -62%
-76% / -97%
-140% / -131%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 144.5 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 144.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 144.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
在户外
在户外
ROG Phone 5 Ultimate的可视角度稳定性
ROG Phone 5 Ultimate的可视角度稳定性

性能、排放和电池寿命

与它的兄弟姐妹一样,华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate搭载了 骁龙888但它可以获得巨大的18GB工作内存。只有联想的Legion Phone Duel 2 Pro,目前只在中国销售,也能拥有这么大的内存。然而,至少在2021年,额外的两到四千兆字节是否会有多大用处,是值得怀疑的。

另一方面,背面的两个额外的电容式触摸元件,对于游戏玩家来说已经是一个更大的附加值。它们对触摸的反应非常可靠和迅速,但它们的位置相当靠近下部长边。如果不采取不寻常的姿势,就很难用小手使用上长边的AirTrigger和独家触摸键。然而,华硕不可能将这些按键放在更高的位置,因为否则它们会被风扇覆盖。然而,那些喜欢许多输入键的人将会喜欢它。

在表面温度和SoC冷却方面,ROG Phone 5 Ultimate显示了其最好的一面。3DMark压力测试也显示,结合可连接的风扇,在框架稳定性方面有小的优势。

两个前置扬声器不仅可以变得非常响亮,还能提供相对较好的声音图像。此外,还有对蓝牙编解码器的广泛支持,以及一个优秀的音频插孔。

在电池运行时间方面,终极版机型与标准版机型呈现出类似的水平。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
1119 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1124 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1132 Points ∼97% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1170 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=21)
1121 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=249, last 2 years)
596 Points ∼51% -47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
3604 Points ∼97%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3717 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3702 Points ∼100% +3%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3644 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3379 - 3810, n=21)
3599 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4829, n=249, last 2 years)
2028 Points ∼55% -44%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
16675 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16391 Points ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13127 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11705 - 17085, n=15)
14724 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=68, last 2 years)
9959 Points ∼60% -40%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15027 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
13586 Points ∼90%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10231 - 15027, n=9)
12332 Points ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=237, last 2 years)
8032 Points ∼53%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
11160 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
10273 Points ∼91% -8%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11302 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10206 Points ∼90% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8257 - 11302, n=15)
10026 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=259, last 2 years)
4237 Points ∼37% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
16530 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15263 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16586 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
15118 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 16863, n=15)
14739 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=259, last 2 years)
5444 Points ∼33% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
5222 Points ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4791 Points ∼90% -8%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5344 Points ∼100% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4775 Points ∼89% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3562 - 5344, n=15)
4792 Points ∼90% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=257, last 2 years)
3019 Points ∼56% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
9413 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9620 Points ∼98% +2%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9839 Points ∼100% +5%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8770 Points ∼89% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=16)
8738 Points ∼89% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=260, last 2 years)
3460 Points ∼35% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
12139 Points ∼94%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12616 Points ∼98% +4%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12914 Points ∼100% +6%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11571 Points ∼90% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=16)
11691 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=260, last 2 years)
3993 Points ∼31% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
5270 Points ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5254 Points ∼98% 0%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5366 Points ∼100% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4748 Points ∼88% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=16)
4723 Points ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=260, last 2 years)
3055 Points ∼57% -42%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
5810 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5722 Points ∼97% -2%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5887 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5895 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=20)
5653 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9386, n=113, last 2 years)
2968 Points ∼50% -49%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
5816 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5703 Points ∼97% -2%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5876 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5875 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=20)
5574 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=109, last 2 years)
3100 Points ∼53% -47%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
91.6 (31.8min - 34.7max) % ∼97%
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
90.7 (31.2min - 34.4max) % ∼96% -1%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
94.2 (5375min - 5708max) % ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
84.1 (4785min - 5690max) % ∼89% -8%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
90.4 (5293min - 5852max) % ∼96% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
86.8 (30.3min - 34.9max) % ∼92% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (54.7 - 97.4, n=19)
80.7 % ∼86% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (26.6 - 99.8, n=103, last 2 years)
90 % ∼96% -2%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
1525 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1511 Points ∼98% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1543 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1559, n=15)
1503 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 3059, n=61, last 2 years)
953 Points ∼62% -38%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
1507 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1501 Points ∼99% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1509 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (997 - 1555, n=15)
1417 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=58, last 2 years)
931 Points ∼62% -38%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
92.6 (8.48min - 9.15max) % ∼96%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
96.4 (1454min - 1509max) % ∼100% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
88.4 (8.24min - 9.31max) % ∼92% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (54.9 - 99.7, n=13)
87 % ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.6 - 100, n=56, last 2 years)
90.5 % ∼94% -2%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
64 fps ∼97%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
66 fps ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
60 fps ∼91% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
51 fps ∼77% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=20)
55.1 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼37% -62%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
81 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
80 fps ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
71 fps ∼88% -12%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
61 fps ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=21)
71 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
28.4 fps ∼35% -65%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
40 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
41 fps ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
40 fps ∼98% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
31 fps ∼76% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=20)
37.4 fps ∼91% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
16.2 fps ∼40% -59%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 18432
31 fps ∼97%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
32 fps ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
27 fps ∼84% -13%
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
22 fps ∼69% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=20)
27.7 fps ∼87% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11 fps ∼34% -65%
Asus ROG Phone 5 UltimateAsus ROG Phone 5Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2Nubia RedMagic 6S ProAverage 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-2%
-6%
-3%
-53%
Sequential Read 256KB
1779.01
1778.64
0%
1999
12%
1606.78
-10%
1813 ?(1710 - 1999, n=5)
2%
807 ?(41.9 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
779.76
794.64
2%
754.3
-3%
765.26
-2%
771 ?(754 - 785, n=5)
-1%
365 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Read 4KB
287.91
291.38
1%
262.6
-9%
285.79
-1%
265 ?(208 - 293, n=5)
-8%
142 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
-51%
Random Write 4KB
284.54
278.05
-2%
261.5
-8%
254.94
-10%
267 ?(221 - 287, n=5)
-6%
132 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
-54%

温度

Max. Load
 36.5 °C37.3 °C36.5 °C 
 35.2 °C36.9 °C37 °C 
 33 °C36.5 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 36 °C
32.9 °C35.2 °C35.2 °C
32.2 °C35.8 °C35.4 °C
32.1 °C34.9 °C35.1 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025309.159.139.129.19.19.048.988.918.848.798.738.698.658.618.588.568.528.518.58.489.319.269.259.229.219.149.149.0598.88.528.48.388.348.348.338.348.328.248.249.159.139.129.19.19.048.988.918.848.798.738.698.658.618.588.568.528.518.58.489.319.269.259.229.219.149.149.0598.88.528.48.388.348.348.338.348.328.248.2434.734.634.534.534.233.833.533.333.132.932.732.532.432.332.13231.931.831.831.834.434.234.234.234.234.234.134.133.833.433.132.732.532.432.131.931.731.531.431.234.934.834.734.233.933.83331.731.731.831.531.531.531.431.230.830.830.630.430.3Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø8.8 (8.48-9.15)
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø8.74 (8.24-9.31)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33 (31.8-34.7)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; no Fan: Ø33.1 (31.2-34.4)
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (30.3-34.9)


演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.637.62525.544.13129.739.84031.142.25034.940.46323.9438023.650.21002351.612517.350.216018.458.520014.45925013.658.731514.963.840011.967.650010.274.263011.580.180011.678.1100011.979125013.277.7160013.278.6200013.282.1250012.784.1315013.483.9400013.881.6500014.580.1630013.978.6800014.173.6100001472.51250014.373.41600016.266.6SPL25.592.4N0.794.7median 13.8median 74.2Delta0.98.142.341.636.538.931.735.232.437.23936.831.732.722.137.121.244.115.849.317.553.214.554.113.357.312.460.912.56414.3681773.222.176.820.275.914.974.414.674.814.573.41571.916.871.418.369.91970.919.672.520.171.620.872.420.267.921.165.930.384.91.264.8median 17median 70.92.66.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Phone 5 UltimateLenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate
6000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 5
6000 mAh
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
5500 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro
5050 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
762
754
-1%
907
19%
829
9%
904 ?(442 - 1953, n=280, last 2 years)
19%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 92)
12h 42min

Pros

+ 强大的性能和18GB内存
+ 许多接口以及额外的控制传感器
+ 带有四路DAC的音频插孔
+ 强大的扬声器
+ 明亮而准确的显示屏

Cons

- 没有无线充电
- 不支持microSD
- 沉重
- 没有IP认证

结论--终极游戏者

在审查中。华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate。测试设备由德国华硕提供。
在审查中。华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate。测试设备由德国华硕提供。

Ultimate的性能比传统的 ROG Phone 5并主要针对该系列的粉丝。工作内存的升级确实不错,规格表上共有18GB,但它在日常使用中只提供了很少的附加值。相比之下,512GB UFS 3.1存储空间为众多游戏和其他数据提供了大量空间。像 专业机型Ultimate也配备了AeroActive Cooler 5,但华硕还增加了一个风扇盒。

华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate让游戏玩家心跳加速。

单色的ROG Vision显示屏可能是一个品味问题,但两个额外的后部触摸传感器工作良好,但对于小手来说,离AirTriggers有点太远。总的来说,ROG Phone 5 Ultimate还是比它的兄弟姐妹们好一点,尽管核心功能是相同的。

一个强有力的选择是 联想Legion Phone Duel 2.如果你还必须在性能方面做出让步,那么 黑鲨4可以作为一种选择。

价格和可用性

华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate在测试时,华硕电子商店已经缺货,但在TradingShenzhenHandyGermany可以买到。

Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate - 09/20/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
99%
Connectivity
76 / 70 → 100%
Weight
87%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
70 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
92 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
70%
Average
85%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 202097 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18108 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG Phone 5 Ultimate评论--游戏智能手机中的收藏品
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-09-23 (Update: 2021-09-23)