Notebookcheck

华硕ROG手机5 Pro评测--更好的游戏智能机

为了更多的热情。 ROG Phone 5是目前最好的游戏智能手机。华硕提供了一个额外的视觉屏幕,更多的存储空间,以及一个更大的交付范围与专业版本。我们的评论澄清了对谁来说升级是值得的。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro (ROG Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.78 inch 20.4:9, 2448 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capazitive, 300 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, 24.3 ms Touch Latency, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerator, E-Compass, Proximity, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic sensors for AirTrigger 5 an grip press detection
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700, 1800, 2100 MHz), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 172.83 x 77.25
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Sony IMX686, 1/1.7", f/1.8, PDAF) + 13 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.4, 125°) + 5 MPix (Macro, f/2.0); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 65W-Charger, USB-Cabel, Plastic Case, AeroActive Cooler 5, ROG UI, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
239 g, Power Supply: 193 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
ratingversion
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.8 %7
09/2021
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
81.4 %7
08/2021
Nubia RedMagic 6R
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186.41 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86 %7
08/2021
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
SD 870, Adreno 650
210 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.4 %7
04/2021
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
259 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.92"2460x1080

案例、设备和操作

ROG Phone 5 Pro不同于 标准变体视觉上,制造质量处于同一水平。然而,最大的区别是在背面,因为Pro有一个所谓的ROG Vision显示屏,而不是点RGB矩阵。这可以显示较小的动画,也可以在给智能手机充电时提供关于当前电池状态的信息,并以适当的动画伴随着附件的连接。

另一个不同之处体现在交货范围上,因为盒子里包括外部AeroActive Cooler 5。

该设备对于智能手机来说是独一无二的。除了用于连接风扇的Pogo PIN,旁边还有一个USB 3.2端口(第2代,最高10GBit/s,支持HDMI和dP,最高UHD,QC 5.0),底部边缘还有一个额外的USB 2.0端口(QC 3.0),可用于游戏时供电。此外,额外的超声波按键AirTrigger 5和一个带有高保真音频DAC的音频插孔也在机身上。

使用带有内部ROG UI的操作系统Android 11。不喜欢这个的用户可以在设置过程中切换到标准UI,这与纯粹的Android 非常相似。

所有现代标准都用于移动数据连接,专业版支持的LTE和5G频段的数量再次增加。Wi-Fi 6E是一种快速的WLAN标准,可以通过双WLAN同时连接到两个网络,在与Netgear Nighthawk AX12的测试中实现了高而稳定的数据传输。

ROG手机的语音质量确实很好,拿在耳边时能提供非常好的清晰度,只有在非常大的环境噪音中才能达到极限。扬声器模式略有混响,但具有良好的麦克风范围和质量。这款华硕智能手机可以接受两张nano-SIM卡,并支持VoLTE。

ROG Phone 5不仅有高达144赫兹的刷新率,而且300赫兹的触摸采样率也非常高,有望在触摸屏上快速实现输入,延迟为24.3毫秒。在生物识别安全方面,显示屏上有一个光学指纹扫描仪,它的识别率相当可靠,但不是最快的之一。二维人脸识别也是可能的。

头部一侧
左边
对
底部边缘

Size comparison

176 mm 78.5 mm 9.9 mm 259 g172.83 mm 77.25 mm 9.9 mm 239 g163.8 mm 76.4 mm 10.4 mm 210 g163.04 mm 75.34 mm 7.8 mm 186.41 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1330 (1256min - 1401max) MBit/s ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Wi-Fi 6E
1189 (693min - 1261max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (620min - 697max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
656 (613min - 676max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
877 (842min - 910max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
811 (771min - 835max) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
789 (660min - 853max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Wi-Fi 6E
788 (710min - 861max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350890889889882892888877866856857881882850865842853869887887861862860858867861867895900910910742687660701753793792817796811800781779800810814853835835827818804793787795789782797810793890889889882892888877866856857881882850865842853869887887861862860858867861867895900910910742687660701753793792817796811800781779800810814853835835827818804793787795789782797810793131113341341133213431265140112831332132813281350134913481342131813181332129712711328134413411256135413391351136613561346620670674687678686676671695687666687678682688682686675674686692688681692689674682683697684Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (842-910)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø788 (660-853)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1330 (1256-1401)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø680 (620-697)

相机--ROG手机5 Pro的三重光学装置

与ROG Phone 5 Pro的自拍
与ROG Phone 5 Pro的自拍

ROG Phone 5 Pro依靠的是由三个镜头组成的相机设置。除了64MP主镜头,还集成了一个超广角和一个微距镜头。尽管索尼的传感器仍然是去年的,但可以用它拍出好照片,而且在分辨率方面的高储备允许较小的变焦水平,而不会有太大的质量损失。视频也可以用8K录制。

前置摄像头也能拍出好照片,但它不能完全补偿背光。视频可以以每秒60帧的全高清方式创建。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
10.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro: 7.15 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 12.15 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
38 ∆E
28 ∆E
62.2 ∆E
62.2 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
35 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
68.2 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro: 44.98 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 76.18 ∆E

显示器 - 改进的直流调光

子像素结构
子像素结构

华硕ROG手机5 Pro的显示屏与标准版相同。 标准版本.它的尺寸为6.78英寸,采用全高清Plus分辨率,最高可达144赫兹。OLED面板在纯白显示中达到了806 cd/m²,并启用了环境光传感器。在明亮和黑暗区域均匀分布的情况下(APL50),它的亮度为1,088 cd/m²,APL10为1,136 cd/m²。如果你手动调整亮度,你有488 cd/m²可供支配。

值得肯定的是,华硕已经改进了直流调光。虽然这仍然只适用于60赫兹,但它现在实际上是有效的。

794
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
806
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
792
cd/m²
787
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 806 cd/m² Average: 794.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5.05 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 789 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
AMOLED, 2460x1080, 6.92
Nubia RedMagic 6R
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Response Times
-30%
111%
-165%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
8 ?(5, 3)
-233%
4 ?(2, 2)
-67%
11 ?(5, 6)
-358%
Response Time Black / White *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
6 ?(3, 3)
-150%
3.2 ?(2, 1.2)
-33%
6 ?(3, 3)
-150%
PWM Frequency
144.5 ?(100)
568.2
293%
769.2 ?(51)
432%
162.3
12%
Screen
-77%
-52%
-115%
Brightness middle
789
463
-41%
442
-44%
676
-14%
Brightness
795
466
-41%
442
-44%
669
-16%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
90
-8%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
3.24
-131%
2.2
-57%
5.77
-312%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3
5.75
-92%
4.9
-63%
9.81
-227%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.4
-159%
3.3
-94%
3.7
-118%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.201 100%
2.25 98%
1.959 112%
CCT
6596 99%
7273 89%
7101 92%
6584 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-54% / -62%
30% / 2%
-140% / -131%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 144.5 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 144.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 144.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB
在户外
在户外
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

华硕ROG手机5 Pro搭载了 骁龙888和高达16GB的LPDDR5内存。图形计算是由集成的 阿德雷诺660.由于高通芯片组被认为难以冷却,华硕完全专注于这个方面,并在任何时候都能结合风扇实现稳定的性能。虽然表面温度明显增加,但它们只在触摸时变热,并保持绝对无害。

没有什么游戏是华硕的智能手机在最高细节设置下不能掌握的,而且它还为超过60FPS的游戏提供了广泛的支持。

两个前置扬声器不仅可以得到非常响亮的声音,还可以提供相对较好的声音图像。还有对蓝牙编解码器的广泛支持,以及一个优秀的音频插孔。

在电池运行时间方面,专业版机型比标准版机型更有效率;制造商似乎在这方面也有改进。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1119 Points ∼99%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1132 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1002 Points ∼89% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=21)
1121 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=249, last 2 years)
596 Points ∼53% -47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3728 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3702 Points ∼99% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3660 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3394 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3379 - 3810, n=21)
3599 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4829, n=249, last 2 years)
2028 Points ∼54% -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
17085 Points ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13273 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
16054 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11705 - 17085, n=15)
14724 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=68, last 2 years)
9959 Points ∼58% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11286 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11302 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10365 Points ∼92% -8%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10111 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
11064 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8257 - 11302, n=15)
10026 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=259, last 2 years)
4237 Points ∼37% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16638 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16586 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
15623 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
14884 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
14968 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 16863, n=15)
14739 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=259, last 2 years)
5444 Points ∼33% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5309 Points ∼92%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5344 Points ∼92% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4764 Points ∼82% -10%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4759 Points ∼82% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
5784 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3562 - 5344, n=15)
4792 Points ∼83% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=257, last 2 years)
3019 Points ∼52% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7596 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6140 - 7596, n=2)
6868 Points ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=233, last 2 years)
2678 Points ∼35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9436 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6816 - 9436, n=2)
8126 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=233, last 2 years)
2836 Points ∼30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4514 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4514 - 4557, n=2)
4536 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=233, last 2 years)
2835 Points ∼63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9649 Points ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9839 Points ∼100% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9374 Points ∼95% -3%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8921 Points ∼91% -8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
8975 Points ∼91% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=16)
8738 Points ∼89% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=260, last 2 years)
3460 Points ∼35% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12563 Points ∼97%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12914 Points ∼100% +3%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12396 Points ∼96% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12266 Points ∼95% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
10646 Points ∼82% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=16)
11691 Points ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=260, last 2 years)
3993 Points ∼31% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5326 Points ∼92%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5366 Points ∼93% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5058 Points ∼87% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4565 Points ∼79% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
5793 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=16)
4723 Points ∼82% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=260, last 2 years)
3055 Points ∼53% -43%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5778 Points ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5887 Points ∼100% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5859 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4351 Points ∼74% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=20)
5653 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9386, n=113, last 2 years)
2968 Points ∼50% -49%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5762 Points ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5876 Points ∼100% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5839 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4352 Points ∼74% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=20)
5574 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=109, last 2 years)
3100 Points ∼53% -46%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
97.4 (33.6min - 34.5max) % ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
90.4 (5293min - 5852max) % ∼93% -7%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 % ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (54.7 - 97.4, n=19)
80.7 % ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (26.6 - 99.8, n=105, last 2 years)
89.8 % ∼92% -8%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1515 Points ∼99%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1535 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1234 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1559, n=15)
1503 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 3059, n=61, last 2 years)
953 Points ∼62% -37%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1513 Points ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1516 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1246 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (997 - 1555, n=15)
1417 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=58, last 2 years)
931 Points ∼61% -38%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
98.1 (8.91min - 9.08max) % ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
97.8 (8.85min - 9.05max) % ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 % ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (54.9 - 99.7, n=13)
87 % ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.6 - 100, n=58, last 2 years)
90.3 % ∼92% -8%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
66 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
60 fps ∼91% -9%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
66 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
53 fps ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=20)
55.1 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼37% -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
85 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
71 fps ∼84% -16%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
79 fps ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
61 fps ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=21)
71 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
28.4 fps ∼33% -67%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
42 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
40 fps ∼95% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
34 fps ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=20)
37.4 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
16.2 fps ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
31 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
27 fps ∼87% -13%
Nubia RedMagic 6R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
29 fps ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
23 fps ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=20)
27.7 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11 fps ∼35% -65%
Asus ROG Phone 5 ProLenovo Legion Phone Duel 2Nubia RedMagic 6RXiaomi Black Shark 4Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-14%
-7%
-6%
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB
1864.01
1999
7%
1330.1
-29%
1662.9
-11%
1813 ?(1710 - 1999, n=5)
-3%
807 ?(41.9 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
-57%
Sequential Write 256KB
785.04
754.3
-4%
689.67
-12%
760.3
-3%
771 ?(754 - 785, n=5)
-2%
365 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
-54%
Random Read 4KB
292.89
262.6
-10%
227.2
-22%
283.1
-3%
265 ?(208 - 293, n=5)
-10%
142 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
-52%
Random Write 4KB
287.16
261.5
-9%
312.89
9%
259.9
-9%
267 ?(221 - 287, n=5)
-7%
132 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
-54%

温度

Max. Load
 36.5 °C37.3 °C36.5 °C 
 35.2 °C36.9 °C37 °C 
 33 °C36.5 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 36 °C
32.9 °C35.2 °C35.2 °C
32.2 °C35.8 °C35.4 °C
32.1 °C34.9 °C35.1 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Tests

0510152025309.089.079.069.079.069.069.069.059.069.059.049.039.039.029.019.018.978.968.948.919.059.039.049.039.029.039.029.029.029.039.029998.998.988.968.948.918.859.319.269.259.229.219.149.149.0598.88.528.48.388.348.348.338.348.328.248.245.246.495.345.085.085.085.085.085.085.085.075.085.085.085.085.085.085.085.085.079.089.079.069.079.069.069.069.059.069.059.049.039.039.029.019.018.978.968.948.919.059.039.049.039.029.039.029.029.029.039.029998.998.988.968.948.918.859.319.269.259.229.219.149.149.0598.88.528.48.388.348.348.338.348.328.248.245.246.495.345.085.085.085.085.085.085.085.075.085.085.085.085.085.085.085.085.0734.534.434.434.434.434.334.334.334.334.334.234.234.234.234.134.133.933.833.733.634.934.834.734.233.933.83331.731.731.831.531.531.531.431.230.830.830.630.430.33120.820.720.820.820.820.820.819.419.219.219.219.219.219.219.219.219.219.219.2Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø9.03 (8.91-9.08)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; without Fan: Ø9 (8.85-9.05)
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø8.74 (8.24-9.31)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.17 (5.07-6.49)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø34.2 (33.6-34.5)
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (30.3-34.9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (19.2-31)


扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.637.62525.544.13129.739.84031.142.25034.940.46323.9438023.650.21002351.612517.350.216018.458.520014.45925013.658.731514.963.840011.967.650010.274.263011.580.180011.678.1100011.979125013.277.7160013.278.6200013.282.1250012.784.1315013.483.9400013.881.6500014.580.1630013.978.6800014.173.6100001472.51250014.373.41600016.266.6SPL25.592.4N0.794.7median 13.8median 74.2Delta0.98.142.341.636.538.931.735.232.437.23936.831.732.722.137.121.244.115.849.317.553.214.554.113.357.312.460.912.56414.3681773.222.176.820.275.914.974.414.674.814.573.41571.916.871.418.369.91970.919.672.520.171.620.872.420.267.921.165.930.384.91.264.8median 17median 70.92.66.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Phone 5 ProLenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
6000 mAh
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
5500 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 6R
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
4500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
885
907
2%
541
-39%
710
-20%
903 ?(442 - 1953, n=281, last 2 years)
2%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 92)
14h 45min

Pros

+ 强大的性能
+ 许多接口
+ 带Quad-DAC的音频插孔
+ 强大的扬声器
+ 明亮而准确的显示

Cons

- 没有无线充电
- 不支持microSD
- 沉重
- 没有IP认证

结论 -- 小小的专业,但有更多的内存

在审查中。华硕ROG手机5 Pro。测试设备由德国华硕提供。
在审查中。华硕ROG手机5 Pro。测试设备由德国华硕提供。

华硕的ROG Phone 5 Pro对于其相当高昂的附加费用来说,其附加值出乎意料地少。背面的Vision显示屏当然是个不错的噱头,但在日常使用中并没有提供任何附加价值。内存的翻倍和额外的频段可能更有趣,而且还包括AeroActive Cooler 5,否则也需要60欧元(约70美元)。

华硕ROG手机5 Pro主要针对的是对内存要求高的用户。

尽管如此,ROG Phone 5 Pro仍然是目前最好的游戏智能手机,拥有强大的配置。除了144赫兹的AMOLED显示屏,性能稳定的处理器、额外的超声波感应键、两个USB接口以及对120和144赫兹的游戏的广泛支持尤为重要。

更便宜的替代品是 黑鲨4RedMagic 6R,但它们也必须在速度、功能和可选配件方面做出让步。

价格和可用性

ROG Phone 5 Pro目前很难买到,在本评论发表时,它甚至从Asus eShop上消失了。而主要可以通过亚洲网站如AliExpress购买。

Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro - 09/17/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
99%
Connectivity
73 / 70 → 100%
Weight
87%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
71 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
93 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
70%
Average
85%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 202097 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18108 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG手机5 Pro评测--更好的游戏智能机
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-09-20 (Update: 2021-09-20)