Notebookcheck Logo

Oukitel WP35 5G 智能手机评测--坚固耐用,电池续航时间长,价格不贵

户外马拉松

Oukitel WP35 电池容量巨大,具有无穷的续航能力,但代价是较高的重量和较大的尺寸。不过,不到 300 美元的价格、夜视摄像头、不错的存储规格和纯正的Android 14 意味着你可以得到很多实惠。
Rugged Smartphone Android ARM
Oukitel WP35 (WP Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 200 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB, shared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity, gyrscope, compass, G-sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G(B1/2/4/5/8/19), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28AB/34/B38/39/40/41F/66/71), 5G (N1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/71/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.3 x 172.2 x 81
Battery
11000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18-watt charging, 5 watt wired reverse charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Sony IMX682, f/1.9, 1/1.73", PDAF, flash, Video@ 2K, 30fps (camera 1), macro camera, BYD BF2257CS, 2 MPix, f/2.2, 1/1.5" (camera 2), nightvision camera, Hynix HI846, f/2.0, 1/4", Infrared light (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2, video @ 1080p, 30 fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB cable, 12 Months Warranty, IP68/IP69K certified, MIL STD 810G, eSIM support, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
360 g
Price
285 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
79.6 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2024
Oukitel WP35
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
360 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash6.60"2408x1080
80.1 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
577.5 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
235 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
82.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Nokia XR21
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
231 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.49"2400x1080
78.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
CAT S53
SD 480, Adreno 619
320 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

表壳和功能 - 时尚的钻石设计

中国制造商 Oukitel 以其防水防震手机而闻名,这些手机也可在恶劣环境中使用。手机如 WP33 Pro等手机。由于电池容量巨大,这款手机可以实现超长的续航时间。不过,这样一来,你就必须忍受 577 克的重量。

在本次评测中,Oukitel WP35 的电池容量略小,但重量明显更轻,结构也更紧凑:360 克和 15.3 毫米的机身厚度仍然比一般的智能手机厚,但在日常使用中,它要比 WP33 Pro.

乍一看,这款坚固的手机壳也不像是 "户外手机"。不过,它的设计很吸引人,有蓝色、绿色和棕色等浅色可供选择,背面还有菱形图案。WP35 通过了 IP68/IP69K 和 MIL STD 810G 认证。防尘防水的特性使其可以抵御多种环境影响。正面显示屏由略微突出的边框和大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。

256 GB 的大容量存储空间还算不错,但只使用了相对较慢的 eMMC 闪存。此外,我们还配备了 8 GB 内存。制造商只是通过数据存储中一个缓慢的交换文件来达到其宣传的 24 GB RAM。

NFC 功能的搭载,意味着您还可以使用手机进行无线支付交易。在内部,USB 接口仅使用 USB 2.0 标准,导致数据传输速度不理想。此外,还无法向外部显示器发送图像信号。

您可以在 5G 手机中插入两张 nano SIM 卡,或者使用一张 nano SIM 卡和一张 eSIM 卡。 选择后者意味着只能使用一个 microSD 来扩展存储空间。

在使用 Angelbird V60 参考存储卡进行的测试中,我们测得该类设备的读卡器速度很高。这意味着没有什么能阻止您将不常用的数据外包给存储卡。

尺寸比较

175.4 mm 84 mm 27.2 mm 577.5 g172.2 mm 81 mm 15.3 mm 360 g171 mm 81 mm 16 mm 320 g168.8 mm 79.9 mm 9.9 mm 235 g168 mm 78.58 mm 10.45 mm 231 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oukitel WP35
  (Angelbird V60)
38.6 MB/s
CAT S53
  (Angelbird V60)
37.8 MB/s -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years)
29.4 MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
27.9 MB/s -28%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Oukitel WP35 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.3-47.3)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø39.3 (27.6-48.9)
CAT S53 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø35.3 (25.3-45.6)
Oukitel WP35 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76 (61.9-82.9)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.9 (47.7-76.5)
CAT S53 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø78 (24.9-84.3)

通信、软件和操作 - 5G 也具有国际性

Oukitel WP35 是一款 5G 手机,可支持多种 4G 和 5G 频率。这使得它无论是在家还是外出都能很好地使用移动互联网。与高端智能手机直接比较,WP35 在城市环境中的信号接收能力并不高,但通常能获得良好的信号强度。

说到 Wi-Fi,该设备搭载了最快的标准--WiFi 5,其 300 至 500 MBit/s 的数据传输速率显得非常实用。在这一领域,WP35 的性能较低,但总体而言,它仍能提供 300 MBit/s 的相对稳定的平均传输速度。

制造商安装了Android 14,除了壁纸和小部件外,还对系统外观进行了一些小改动,对设置进行了补充。预装了一些额外的应用程序,如儿童或老年用户专用的简单启动器、水平仪、音量计和收音机应用程序。不过,没有第三方广告应用程序。

在测试时,该操作系统拥有从 2024 年 3 月起的安全补丁,这些补丁仍然是相对最新的。不过,Oukiel 没有透露更新的频率和时间。不过,该软件是可下载的,这意味着如果出现任何问题,可以通过 PC 等设备进行安装。

显示屏的刷新率为 60 赫兹,这意味着它不像其他户外手机那样操作流畅。不过,总体而言,它还是可靠的,每个显示角落都反应灵敏。机壳右侧的物理按键手感很好,左右手用户都能轻松操作。

指纹传感器位于待机键内,触摸它时解锁设备会有短暂的延迟。此外,在显示最近使用的屏幕之前,它总是会短暂显示锁定屏幕。 但总的来说,它工作可靠,没有任何问题。该按钮还可以通过手势实现其他操作功能。此外,还支持 2D 人脸识别功能,只要光线条件良好,识别速度就会非常快。

机身左侧还有一个可自由分配的按键,既可分配给系统功能,也可用于打开应用程序。

Networking
Oukitel WP35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
329 (min: 317) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
303 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼49%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
339 (min: 323) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
345 (min: 302) MBit/s ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
944 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
910 (min: 677) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia XR21
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 326) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
346 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼56%
CAT S53
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
682 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
614 (min: 544) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Oukitel WP35; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (253-332)
Oukitel WP35; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (317-338)

摄像头 - 它能看到夜景

前置摄像头图像
前置摄像头图像
夜视摄像机图像
夜视摄像机图像

起初,摄像头的设置似乎并不出众:主摄像头可捕捉 6400 万像素的图像,但通常使用 1600 万像素的分辨率和大像素来捕捉更多光线。此外,我们还要面对一个低分辨率的微距摄像头,用于拍摄极端特写。

不过,设备后部的第三个摄像头却很特别:Oukitel 安装了一个带有红外二极管的夜视摄像头,这意味着即使在完全黑暗的环境中,它也能拍照。我们在黑暗的房间里进行了尝试,在靠近目标物和距离目标物几米远的地方都拍到了不错的效果。不过,夜视照片只有黑白两色。

相比之下,主摄像头也可以拍摄彩色照片,尽管在背光的情况下有些困难:HDR 功能可以记录不同亮度的图像。这通常会在每个区域获得曝光良好的图像,但在这里并非如此。在正常拍摄时,色彩准确自然,令人印象深刻。考虑到其价格和户外手机的身份,其细节水平是合适的。不过,在弱光条件下,相机的性能会受到影响,因为在暗处几乎什么都看不清:

在实验室拍摄的 1 勒克斯照明下的图像中,什么也看不清,但在全棚照明下,细节和清晰度都不错,甚至边缘也很清晰。

前置摄像头可拍摄 3200 万像素的图像,但通常只使用四分之一的分辨率。即使在光线充足的条件下,自拍照也会显得有点暗,虽然色彩还原度较低,但放大后的细节还算合格。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera environmentMain camera low light
ColorChecker
4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Oukitel WP35: 3.85 ∆E min: 1.05 - max: 7.78 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oukitel WP35: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 显示屏

子像素图像
子像素图像

Oukitel WP35 的全高清分辨率略有提高,代表了同类产品的标准。IPS 面板还具有不错的亮度,在我们的测试中,它的平均亮度为 549 cd/m²。这意味着,如果阳光不直接照射到显示屏上,您也可以在夏天的户外使用该设备。

黑屏亮度略低于同类产品,而对比度则达到了 1,314:1 的较高水平。

在光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件的测试中,我们注意到了相当严重的蓝色色调。蓝色色调的显示严重偏离了最佳色彩空间。不过,几乎每种色彩的细微差别都很明显。

我们没有检测到任何 PWM 闪烁,但对于专业用户来说,显示器的响应时间太慢了。

536
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 568 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 549.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.75 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 552 cd/m²
Contrast: 1314:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 10.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.785
Oukitel WP35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Nokia XR21
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5"
CAT S53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Response Times
16%
34%
2%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.6 ?(23.4, 17.2)
32.5 ?(17.5, 15)
20%
31 ?(16, 15)
24%
42.05 ?(18.9, 23.15)
-4%
53 ?(27.7, 25.3)
-31%
Response Time Black / White *
24.4 ?(13, 11.4)
21.6 ?(10.8, 10.8)
11%
14 ?(9, 5)
43%
22.54 ?(8.912, 13.63)
8%
21.4 ?(13.9, 7.5)
12%
PWM Frequency
55100
Screen
-22%
-7%
20%
6%
Brightness middle
552
539
-2%
510
-8%
503
-9%
476
-14%
Brightness
549
517
-6%
495
-10%
487
-11%
504
-8%
Brightness Distribution
94
90
-4%
92
-2%
94
0%
82
-13%
Black Level *
0.42
0.5
-19%
0.46
-10%
0.45
-7%
0.6
-43%
Contrast
1314
1078
-18%
1109
-16%
1118
-15%
793
-40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.22
11.88
-65%
7.41
-3%
2.4
67%
3.18
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.09
17.9
-37%
13.26
-1%
6.6
50%
5.86
55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.1
12.9
-28%
10.6
-5%
1.9
81%
4.2
58%
Gamma
1.785 123%
1.597 138%
2.518 87%
2.22 99%
2.268 97%
CCT
9036 72%
9933 65%
10050 65%
6602 98%
7234 90%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -15%
14% / 1%
11% / 16%
-2% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.4 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8782 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰阶
卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩空间
CalMAN 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池运行时间 - 出色的耐力

联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6100+这颗 SoC 处理器基本能满足日常流畅运行的需求,但如果要完成要求更高的任务,它的性能储备就显得不足了。例如,可以在 YouTube 上进行 1080p 无卡顿流媒体播放,不过由于缺乏 Widevine L1 认证,许多流媒体服务无法提供完整的质量。

不过,在切换应用程序或加载较大内容时,偶尔会出现等待时间。这也是由于 eMMC 内存速度较慢造成的。还有更强大的户外手机,如 诺基亚 XR21Galaxy XCover 6 Pro但只要您不运行要求苛刻的应用程序,Oukitel WP35 就能满足您的需求。

即使在持续负载情况下,机身温度的上升也非常合理,而且我们在使用 3DMark 压力测试时也没有检测到任何 SoC 跳频现象。

手机底部边缘的单声道扬声器重现声音时侧重于高频,使声音听起来不那么真实。听音乐或电影的声音并不有趣,因此你应该考虑通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。这两种方法都能顺利进行,并带来优质音质。有多种编解码器可用于无线音频传输,还有 Opus 或 LC3 等更特别的选择。

11,000 毫安时电池无疑是这款设备的亮点之一,它能提供良好的运行时间:在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款智能手机运行了 1659 分钟,即 27 小时 39 分钟。这比 Oukitel WP33 Pro相比要少得多,但作为回报,您不必再随身携带那么多重量。这就意味着你可以中度使用手机两天。

不过,充电过程比较缓慢:由于手机只能以 18 瓦的功率充电,因此一个完整的充电周期大约需要 5 个小时。通过有线反向充电,其他设备的充电功率可达 5 瓦。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=158, last 2 years)
1442 Points +113%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
903 Points +33%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
699 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (678 - 699, n=5)
692 Points +2%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
678 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=158, last 2 years)
4017 Points +116%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2064 Points +11%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1944 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1814 - 1944, n=5)
1879 Points +1%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1858 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
773 Points +50%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
673 Points +30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (517 - 538, n=5)
527 Points +2%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
521 Points +1%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
517 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
510 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2802 Points +72%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1923 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1589 - 1780, n=5)
1689 Points +4%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1642 Points +1%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1625 Points
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1589 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12948 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12113 Points +40%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9180 Points +6%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8996 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8482 - 9078, n=5)
8841 Points +2%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8629 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +210%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3080 Points +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2468 - 2503, n=5)
2488 Points 0%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2482 Points
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2468 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +393%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2984 Points +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2281 - 2344, n=5)
2321 Points 0%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2314 Points
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2281 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +38%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3468 Points +4%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3459 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (3258 - 3459, n=5)
3330 Points 0%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3324 Points
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2822 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2464 Points +101%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1228 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1186 - 1230, n=5)
1219 Points -1%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1212 Points -1%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1186 Points -3%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
997 Points -19%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7517 Points +523%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2472 Points +105%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1208 Points 0%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1207 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1174 - 1208, n=5)
1200 Points -1%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1174 Points -3%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
974 Points -19%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2043 Points +523%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
686 Points +109%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
362 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (328 - 338, n=5)
332 Points +1%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
331 Points +1%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
328 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
296 Points -10%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2040 Points +539%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
684 Points +114%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
354 Points +11%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
330 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (319 - 330, n=5)
325 Points +2%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
319 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
287 Points -10%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.4 fps +280%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
31 fps +138%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps +131%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (13 - 14, n=5)
13.4 fps +3%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps 0%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.6 fps +431%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps +127%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22 fps +47%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps +20%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps 0%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (15 - 15, n=5)
15 fps 0%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.2 fps +343%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps +126%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps +126%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps +43%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8.4 - 8.7, n=5)
8.54 fps +2%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.5 fps +1%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.4 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
31.7 fps +456%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps +128%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8.2 fps +44%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.5 fps +14%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.7 fps 0%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.7 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (5.7 - 5.7, n=5)
5.7 fps 0%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 46, n=201, last 2 years)
15 fps +525%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5.9 fps +146%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3.6 fps +50%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2.9 fps +21%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.4 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2.3 - 2.4, n=5)
2.38 fps -1%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.3 fps -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
36802 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
25445 Points +14%
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22617 Points +1%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22330 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (21764 - 22638, n=5)
22293 Points 0%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22080 Points -1%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18774 Points -16%
Oukitel WP35Oukitel WP33 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy XCover 6 ProNokia XR21CAT S53Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
897%
665%
543%
412%
156%
1234%
Sequential Read 256KB
292
482.1
65%
841.6
188%
509.76
75%
510.9
75%
272 ?(240 - 297, n=5)
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
149.5
515.6
245%
484.7
224%
465.31
211%
208.2
39%
Random Read 4KB
61.7
253.9
312%
170.6
176%
187.51
204%
140.7
128%
81.3 ?(61.7 - 100, n=5)
32%
Random Write 4KB
9.4
288
2964%
204.2
2072%
167.51
1682%
141.4
1404%

温度

Max. Load
 35.9 °C30.4 °C30.1 °C 
 35.7 °C30 °C30 °C 
 34.4 °C30 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 31.8 °C
28.2 °C30.9 °C31.9 °C
28.2 °C31.7 °C31.7 °C
27.9 °C31 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 31.9 °C
Average: 30.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图前端
热图前端
后方热图
后方热图

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Oukitel WP35 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.979 (1.962-2)
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.986 (1.98-1.997)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.1 (4.1-4.11)
Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Oukitel WP35 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.36 (7.33-7.37)
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.12 (7.1-7.12)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.6 (14.6-14.7)
Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.22 (7.22-7.26)
CAT S53 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø5.92 (5.88-5.93)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.739.82533.236.43129.327.64032.330.95040.7356332.629.78019.718.610016.916.712515.514.416013.320.42009.624.525011.8333159.238.94008.744.75001150.663013.257.580013.762.7100014.869125013.769.3160010.669.2200010.968.5250012.366.5315013.760.8400013.660.9500013.964.5630014.464.8800015.664.41000015.964.7125001660.81600016.743.5SPL25.877.8N0.737.6median 13.7median 60.8Delta2.113.138.635.737.137.7282632.933.831.832.82628.822.927.221.131.523.734.418.237.813.341.914.54712.852.311.455.711.761.210.96815.275.612.280.112.881.410.976.910.974.911.674.51273.112.972.713.681.614.383.115.177.315.773.116.569.217.469.425.489.90.779.1median 13.3median 73.12.311.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel WP35CAT S53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel WP35 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

CAT S53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G
22000 mAh
2844 min +71%
Oukitel WP35
11000 mAh
1659 min
CAT S53
5500 mAh
1135 min -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=201, last 2 years)
981 min -41%
Nokia XR21
4800 mAh
875 min -47%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
768 min -54%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
27h 39min

Pros

+ 设计精巧的外壳
+ 频率覆盖良好的 5G
+ 防水防尘
+ 夜视摄像头
+ 存储袋
+ 支持 eSIM
+ 无 PWM 闪烁
+ 超长电池寿命

Cons

- 相当笨重
- 缓慢的 eMMC 存储
- 无 Widevine 认证
- 充电速度慢
- 显示屏色彩准确度一般
- 扬声器效果差

结论 - Oukitel 手机适用于极端环境

回顾:Oukitel WP35。评测设备由 Oukitel 提供。
回顾:Oukitel WP35。评测设备由 Oukitel 提供。

Oukitel WP35 5G 是一个很好的折中方案,适合需要长电池续航时间但又不想随身携带像 Oukitel WP33 Pro 这样的 "怪物 "的用户。 WP33 Pro:在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,我们的评测设备续航时间长达 27 个小时,而且包装匀称(不过分沉重)。WP35 外观精巧,但仍能保持坚固的构造,并能很好地抵御环境影响。

夜视摄像头是它的另一项特色功能,非常适合在黑暗中拍照和定位。同样,eSIM 支持和 NFC 并不总是户外手机的标准配置。

在阴天户外使用时,显示屏亮度足够,性能也不错。

一个令人烦恼的问题是,Oukitel 选择放弃 Widevine L1 认证,这意味着无法在许多流媒体平台上播放高清流媒体。此外,它只有缓慢的 eMMC 存储空间,而这种存储空间现在应该已经从所有移动设备中消失了。

Oukitel WP35 5G 是一款特殊的户外手机:夜视摄像头和大容量电池使其成为一款功能强大的生存专家。尽管如此,您还是得忍受沉重的设备和缓慢的存储速度。

重量不是问题的人应该选择 Oukitel WP33 Pro的电池续航时间要好得多。诺基亚 诺基亚 XR21的电池续航时间要短得多。

价格和供应情况

从 2024 年 6 月起,Oukitel WP35 可直接从制造商 Oukitel 处购买,并有可能送货到欧洲,不久还将在亚马逊上销售。

Oukitel WP35 - 05/31/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
85%
Battery
96%
Display
82%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 41%
Application Performance
69 / 86 → 80%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
65 / 90 → 73%
Camera
54%
Average
74%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oukitel WP35 5G 智能手机评测--坚固耐用,电池续航时间长,价格不贵
Florian Schmitt, 2024-06- 9 (Update: 2024-06- 9)