结论Oukitel WP300
与大多数制造商的手机一样，Oukitel WP300 的关键在于它是否适合你的个人需求。
不可否认，这款手机笨重，但它提供了令人印象深刻的离网续航能力和一些不同寻常的功能。如果你需要一个明亮的手电筒（如果算上标准的 LED 闪光灯，甚至需要两个），经常使用耳机，或者需要基本的智能手表功能，那么这款设备就能满足你的所有需求。
WP300 的性能足以胜任日常任务，显示屏明亮，并能避免 PWM 闪烁。不过，经常模糊的摄像头图像令人失望，虽然扬声器的音量很大，但音质仍然一般。
总而言之，Oukitel WP300 是一款非常耐用的专业工具，只有在特定场景下才能证明其真正的实用性。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Amazon.de上，Oukitel WP300 目前的售价约为 470 欧元（≈ 510 美元），并提供 60 欧元（≈ 65 美元）的 优惠券。
您也可以直接从制造商处购买通常价格在 400-450 欧元之间（取决于当前的促销活动）。
Oukitel 英国商店上，Oukitel WP300 目前的销售价格为 320.70 英镑（≈ 430.60 美元），低于原价 447.49 英镑（≈ 600.10 美元）。
- $7.52KJYFOANI for Oukitel WP300/Pro Screen Protector Tempered Galss, [1 Pack] High Clear [9H Hardness] [Bubble Free] Screen Tempered Glass Protective Film for
- $8.32HGJTFANY Phone Case for Oukitel WP300 5G (6.80") with [2 x Tempered Glass Protective Film], Ultra-Thin Shockproof Bumper Cover Black Soft Silicone Case for Oukitel WP300 5G - Green Goblin
规格
底盘和功能：半模块化 "的真正含义是什么？
Oukitel WP300 体积庞大，重量达 514 克，这可能是某些用户需要考虑的问题。不出所料，为了方便携带，制造商还为手机配备了一条颈带。手机厚度超过 2.3 厘米，只能放在特别大的裤兜里。
红色评测机的背面非常醒目，相机模块周围有横条纹和华夫格纹理装饰。在默认配置下，与之相邻的是集成的野营灯。它通过专用应用程序进行控制，可发出高达 400 流明的亮度，大致相当于传统的 40 瓦白炽灯泡或 5 瓦 LED 灯。它也可以取下，通过侧面的一个小按钮进行手动操作。
此外，用户还可以在背面安装一个小型辅助显示屏。包装盒中的这个模块背面集成了耳塞和麦克风，可用作耳机。通过附带的表带，当它与手机分离时，还可以作为智能手表佩戴。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
连接和操作WiFi 6 及更多
WP300 上的 WiFi 6 是最快的无线标准，可同时接入 2.4 GHz 和 5 GHz 频段。
在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中，数据传输速度非常稳定，不过一些同类设备的传输速度略好一些。偶尔也能观察到轻微的速度下降。
Oukitel 智能手机支持 5G，覆盖的频段足以在国外旅行时使用移动互联网。不过，WP300 还称不上是真正的全球通用手机。
120 Hz 显示屏能快速、可靠地响应触摸输入。机身左侧有一个可编程按钮，可用于启动应用程序或执行命令。
待机键上集成了指纹传感器。设置完成后，它能可靠地识别存储的指纹，但在手机解锁前会有轻微延迟。通过前置摄像头进行面部识别也是一种解锁方法。
| Networking | |
| Oukitel WP300 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性：更新政策不明确
系统软件基于Android 15。在测试时，安全补丁的日期是 2025 年 3 月，因此已经过时。制造商没有说明提供更新的频率和时间。
设备本身没有明显的可持续发展措施，包装也使用了塑料薄膜。
相机：部分图像模糊
主后置摄像头采用 10800 万像素传感器。虽然纸面分辨率很高，但有时图像会出现部分模糊，而且在高对比度场景中，传感器在动态范围方面略显吃力。
支持 4K 视频录制，但只能以 30 fps 的速度录制。自动对焦偶尔会出现问题，尤其是在拍摄快速移动的物体时，但如果取景保持相对稳定，拍摄的画面仍然可用。
此外，还配备了专用的微距摄像头，但分辨率仅为 200 万像素，细节有限。
前置 3200 万像素摄像头用于自拍。自拍效果一般，清晰度和色彩还原都不错。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
显示屏：明亮且无 PWM
Oukitel 手机采用分辨率为 2460 × 1080 像素的 IPS 显示屏，与同类产品不相上下。内容显示清晰，屏幕亮度也非常出色，高达 860 cd/m²。
强烈的偏蓝确实会在一定程度上影响色彩的准确性。积极的一面是，无需担心 PWM 闪烁。即使在亮度很低的情况下，我们的测量也没有发现任何调制迹象。
遗憾的是，该设备没有通过 Widevine L1 认证，这使得视频流平台无法显示高清或 4K 分辨率的内容。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 860 cd/m²
Contrast: 1870:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
81.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.293
| Oukitel WP300 IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8" | Doogee Blade 20 Turbo IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Oukitel WP200 Pro AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -14% | -13% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 860 | 475 -45% | 495 -42% | 512 -40% |
| Brightness | 841 | 441 -48% | 466 -45% | 511 -39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 88 -5% | 86 -8% | 98 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.43 7% | 0.58 -26% | |
| Contrast | 1870 | 1105 -41% | 853 -54% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.73 | 7.83 -1% | 5.85 24% | 5.01 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.66 | 11.09 29% | 9.78 38% | 6.93 56% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 8.3 -6% | 7 10% | 3.5 55% |
| Gamma | 2.293 96% | 2.68 82% | 2.231 99% | 2.241 98% |
| CCT | 8051 81% | 8806 74% | 8691 75% | 7137 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8343 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命：动力和持久力
得益于 联发科 Dimensity 7050，Oukitel WP300 的性能水平相当不错。虽然它无法与 Galaxy XCover 7 Pro的性能，但总体上足以满足日常流畅使用的需求。快速存储当然也是原因之一。
长时间负载后，外壳会明显发热，但性能几乎不会下降。
扬声器的音量可达 91 分贝（A）以上，令人印象深刻。不过，音量越大音质越差，尤其是在播放音乐时，因此音量设置最好适中。无线蓝牙传输支持多种音频编解码器，包括 Opus 等不常用的编解码器。
超大电池容量超过 16000 毫安时，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中实现了近 30 小时的续航。在一般使用情况下，两天不充电应该不成问题。即使在较重的使用情况下，一天不充电也是可以应付的。不过，充电需要时间，因为该设备支持的最大输入功率为 45 瓦，这意味着完全充满电池可能需要 6 个小时。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (231 - 1131, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (528 - 531, n=2) | |
| Oukitel WP300 | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (231 - 4555, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (561 - 579, n=2) | |
| Oukitel WP300 | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (133 - 4549, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (1645 - 1704, n=2) | |
| Oukitel WP300 | |
| Oukitel WP300 | Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | Oukitel WP200 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -41% | 151% | 108% | 111% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1836.5 | 1873.2 2% | 1043.4 -43% | 997.7 -46% | 1867 ? 2% | 2144 ? 17% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1520.8 | 1250.2 -18% | 232.6 -85% | 936.4 -38% | 1289 ? -15% | 1737 ? 14% |
| Random Read 4KB | 296 | 280.9 -5% | 194.4 -34% | 368.5 24% | 288 ? -3% | 293 ? -1% |
| Random Write 4KB | 64.8 | 72.4 12% | 63.5 -2% | 494.1 663% | 354 ? 446% | 334 ? 415% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oukitel WP300 | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oukitel WP300 | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Oukitel WP300 | |
| Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
Oukitel WP300 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Oukitel WP200 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Oukitel WP300 16000 mAh | Doogee Blade 20 Turbo 10300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 4350 mAh | Oukitel WP200 Pro 8800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | -51% | -14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1798 | 1397 -22% | 889 -51% | 1544 -14% |
| H.264 | 967 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Oukitel WP300 是一款高度耐用的户外智能手机，具有与众不同的功能，包括内置手电筒和可用作智能手表、耳机或副显示屏的模块化配件。不可否认，这款手机虽然笨重，但却为离网场景提供了实用工具。
Oukitel WP300
- 07/15/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: Comparable devices at a glance
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 74.3%  | Oukitel WP300 MediaTek Dimensity 7050 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $10.35 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for O... 2. $7.52 KJYFOANI for Oukitel WP300/P... 3. $8.32 HGJTFANY Phone Case for Ouki... List Price: 469€ | 514 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2460x1080 395 PPI IPS |
2. 73.5%  | Doogee Blade 20 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 7050 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $259.98 List Price: 379€ | 331 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.60" 1612x720 267 PPI IPS |
3. 75.8%  | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $599.99 List Price: 609€ | 240 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" 2408x1080 400 PPI PLS |
4. 76.8%  | Oukitel WP200 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200 ⎘ ARM Mali-G610 MP6 ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: List Price: 645€ | 311 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2412x1080 394 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
