Notebookcheck Logo

CAT S53评测--具有5G功能的坚固防水手机

灯具店中最亮的灯。 庞大、坚固、稳定--这就是CAT S53第一眼看上去的样子。这款带有5G和2个LED灯的手机不仅提供了一个明亮的工作环境,而且还能防水、防尘和防摔。在测试中,我们看一下这款手机是否适合日常使用。
Android ARM Smartphone
CAT S53


CAT S53 (S Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass 6, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 128 GB, shared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n28/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 171 x 81
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18W (Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0), 10W (Qi Wireless charging)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), dual LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker on the back, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP68/​IP69K-certified, MIL-STD-810H-certified, torch (up to 120 Lumen), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
320 g
Price
550 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.3 %
04/2023
CAT S53
SD 480, Adreno 619
320 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
77.2 %
12/2019
CAT S52
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
210 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.65"1440x720
82.6 %
12/2022
Gigaset GX6
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4
278 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2412x1080
81.9 %
08/2022
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
235 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
81.1 %
09/2021
Nokia XR20
SD 480, Adreno 619
248 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

CAT S53是一款真正的加固型手机,不仅可以防水防尘,而且由于其加固的底盘和凹陷的屏幕,还可以很好地承受跌落。这在重量上也很明显:CAT手机的重量为320克,即使在户外手机中也不算轻。

上一代产品,即 CAT S52,希望能更优雅。我们的测试设备第一眼看上去就像一个经典的工作电话。因此,有一个略微粗糙的表面,这有助于CAT S53不那么容易从手上滑落,背面有一个抓地的凹槽图案,背面有一个巨大的相机模块。在上边缘还有一个LED灯,其亮度高达120流明。此外,相机模块中还有一个LED闪光灯,可以永久激活。

所有插槽都有橡胶盖保护,用手指很难打开。然而,这些确保了非常好的防尘和防水性能,符合IP68/IP69K和MIL-STD-810H标准。

NFC也在船上,还有一个microSD阅读器。然而,如果你想使用microSD扩展内存,你必须放弃其中的一张SIM卡。在我们与参考的microSD Angelbird V60进行的CPDT基准测试以及复制测试中,读卡器被证明是相当快的。

CAT S53
CAT S53
CAT S53
CAT S53

尺寸比较

171 mm 81 mm 16 mm 320 g170.7 mm 82.2 mm 11.9 mm 278 g171.6 mm 81.5 mm 10.6 mm 248 g168.8 mm 79.9 mm 9.9 mm 235 g158.1 mm 76.6 mm 9.7 mm 210 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
37.8 MB/s
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
30.6 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.9 MB/s -26%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22 MB/s -42%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
CAT S53 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø35.3 (25.3-45.6)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø41.8 (28.1-52.6)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø39.3 (27.6-48.9)
Nokia XR20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø23 (17.4-38)
CAT S53 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø78 (24.9-84.3)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.5 (53.1-77.5)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.9 (47.7-76.5)
Nokia XR20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø74.4 (32.7-83.3)

通信、软件和操作 - 旧的操作系统

通过CAT S53,制造商还首次为其户外手机之一带来了5G连接。相当多的频率可用于目前最快的移动标准,也可用于4G,因此,即使在旅行时,你也可以用智能手机冲浪。在我们测试期间的随机测试中,移动接收证明是好的,但还没有达到高端智能手机的水平。

在无线局域网方面,有WiFi 5,整体速度不错,但也有明显的波动和个别的传输速率下降的情况。

CAT S53的操作系统仍然基于Android 11,测试时的安全补丁是2022年7月的。对于企业客户来说,一个较早的Android 版本可能是可取的,因为内部编写的应用程序必须适应每个新的Android 版本。然而,至少安全应该是在一个较新的水平上。毕竟,CAT只预装了几个第三方的应用程序,可以很容易地删除。

CAT S53的触摸屏仍然可以在手指潮湿和戴手套的情况下使用。例如,外壳左侧的一个大型可编程按钮可用于启动应用程序或切换集成手电筒。后面的摄像头模块下面有一个指纹传感器。它的位置对大手来说不是很理想,但它能可靠地识别存储的手指,并在大约一秒钟的延迟后从待机状态解锁手机。脸部识别也是可能的,但它只是基于软件,因此不那么安全。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=205, last 2 years)
648 MBit/s +6%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
614 (544min - 640max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=206, last 2 years)
683 MBit/s 0%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
682 (353min - 727max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=56, last 2 years)
1543 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
944 (866min - 952max) MBit/s
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
892 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=56, last 2 years)
1376 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
910 (677min - 949max) MBit/s
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
743 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
630 (561min - 645max) MBit/s
CAT S52
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
256 (138min - 284max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
649 (589min - 673max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
CAT S52
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 (188min - 274max) MBit/s
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720Tooltip
CAT S53; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø614 (544-640)
CAT S53; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø682 (353-727)

照相机--不是很有说服力

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

索尼的IMX582被用作主相机的传感器。它提供了4800万像素的分辨率,但默认情况下将四个像素合二为一,这样就可以获得更好的出光率,并创建1200万像素的照片。背面还有一个低分辨率的微距相机,可用于极端特写的特殊模式。

来自主摄像头的照片看起来明显模糊,可以更好地提亮。白平衡在出厂时设置得相当冷。弱点在弱光和高对比度下特别明显。测试图在演播室灯光下也显得很模糊。

视频最多能以1080p和30帧的速度录制。材料的清晰度在这里也可以更高,但至少自动对焦工作得相当快,而且亮度调节效果很好。

自拍相机具有1600万像素的高分辨率。在这里,照片看起来也有点酷,放大后很有颗粒感。

因此,CAT S53不是一款适合摄影爱好者的手机,但该相机对于快照或记录来说是足够的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
click to load images
ColorChecker
14.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker CAT S53: 8.87 ∆E min: 5.37 - max: 15.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
66.4 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
87 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
ColorChecker CAT S53: 46.74 ∆E min: 14.31 - max: 87.02 ∆E

显示 - CAT S53的真彩色屏幕

子像素结构
子像素结构

屏幕提供的分辨率为1600 x 720像素。在CAT S53的价位上,一个帧率超过60赫兹的全高清屏幕是可能的,而竞争者证明了这一点。504cd/m²的亮度是不错的,但即使是户外手机,更多的亮度总是受欢迎的,以确保在阳光下的良好可读性。

黑值很高,为0.6cd/m²,因此对比度下降,显示的颜色看起来相当暗淡。然而,正如我们在用分光光度计和软件CalMAN进行的测试中发现的那样,颜色再现是真实的。显示器中没有明显的偏色,只有少数色调明显偏离了参考色空间。

我们没有注意到IPS显示屏的PWM闪烁。

521
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 544 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 503.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: 793:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.268
CAT S53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
CAT S52
IPS, 1440x720, 5.65
Gigaset GX6
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Nokia XR20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
62%
19%
-41%
21%
Brightness middle
476
521
9%
505
6%
510
7%
599
26%
Brightness
504
530
5%
491
-3%
495
-2%
598
19%
Brightness Distribution
82
91
11%
93
13%
92
12%
99
21%
Black Level *
0.6
0.16
73%
0.3
50%
0.46
23%
0.33
45%
Contrast
793
3256
311%
1683
112%
1109
40%
1815
129%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.18
2.69
15%
4.32
-36%
7.41
-133%
4.52
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.86
5.07
13%
7.22
-23%
13.26
-126%
7.6
-30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
1.8
57%
3
29%
10.6
-152%
4.2
-0%
Gamma
2.268 97%
2.243 98%
2.268 97%
2.518 87%
2.279 97%
CCT
7234 90%
6622 98%
7098 92%
10050 65%
7309 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.


CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.9 ms rise
↘ 7.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.7 ms rise
↘ 25.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 可以使用更多的电力

随着 高通骁龙480 5G,CAT集成了最现代的移动标准,但与这个价格范围内的其他耐用型手机相比,该SoC并没有提供太多的性能。尤其是 Galaxy XCover 6 Pro在处理器和图形性能方面处于一个完全不同的联盟。

CAT S53在菜单中运行时通常没有延迟,但在更复杂的应用程序中或当另一个进程在后台运行时,手机会明显停滞。事实上,系统感觉不那么流畅也是由于智能手机只有60赫兹的屏幕,而且安装了较慢的eMMC存储。

CAT S53的正面温度高达45.1℃,在室温下,CAT S53在负载下已经可以变得相当热。在热天拿着手机也可能变得不舒服。然而,这并不影响性能:在3DMark压力测试结束时仍能达到初始帧率的99.1%。

扬声器位于背面的相机模块中。当手机放在柔软的表面上时,这不是一个理想的位置,但扬声器可以变得相当响亮。这在嘈杂的工作环境中很有帮助。

在声音方面,高音部分被非常强烈地强调,这在我们的图表中也可以看到。音乐听起来也有点闷闷不乐。一个3.5毫米音频端口可用于连接耳机或扬声器,还有蓝牙5.1用于无线连接。现代的aptX TWS+编解码器也是可用的,但不是目前的LHDC变种。

CAT使用一个强大的5500毫安时电池,可以用高达18瓦的功率充电。然而,包装中不包括合适的充电器,只有一条USB线。这款手机甚至支持高达10瓦的无线充电。这款手机的耐力很好,在我们的WLAN测试中几乎达到了19小时,但通过电缆充电可能需要3小时或更长时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
773 Points +52%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
693 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (503 - 520, n=9)
511 Points 0%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
510 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
504 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2802 Points +71%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2095 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1618 - 1713, n=9)
1665 Points +1%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1662 Points +1%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1642 Points
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +87%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
684 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
684 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +91%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1787 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
1787 Points 0%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2528 Points +154%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2464 Points +147%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2179 Points +119%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
997 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (980 - 997, n=9)
983 Points -1%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
980 Points -2%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=197, last 2 years)
6135 Points +530%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2472 Points +154%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2167 Points +122%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
977 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (969 - 979, n=9)
975 Points 0%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
974 Points
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=202, last 2 years)
1647 Points +456%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
686 Points +132%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
607 Points +105%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
296 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
294 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (290 - 296, n=8)
293 Points -1%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=197, last 2 years)
1656 Points +477%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
684 Points +138%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
594 Points +107%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
287 Points 0%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
287 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (284 - 291, n=8)
286 Points 0%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=203, last 2 years)
12.5 fps +331%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5.9 fps +103%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4.4 fps +52%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2.9 - 2.9, n=2)
2.9 fps 0%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps 0%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
16 fps -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (9.9 - 19, n=9)
12.9 fps -32%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10 fps -47%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps -75%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +286%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps +100%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11 fps +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6.4 - 6.7, n=9)
6.53 fps 0%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.5 fps 0%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.5 fps
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps -77%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps +39%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
31 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps -3%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
24 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 31, n=9)
20.7 fps -33%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps -48%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.4 fps -76%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps +251%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps +89%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
28 fps +56%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps 0%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (17 - 19, n=9)
18 fps 0%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.9 fps -78%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps +47%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
28 fps -3%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
21 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (14 - 29, n=6)
18.8 fps -35%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
14 fps -52%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.9 fps -83%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +266%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
33 fps +106%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
25 fps +56%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps 0%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 16, n=6)
16 fps 0%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2.8 fps -82%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
25445 Points +36%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
21753 Points +16%
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18774 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17816 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (15636 - 18774, n=6)
16687 Points -11%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4494 Points -76%
CAT S53CAT S52Gigaset GX6Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 ProNokia XR20Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-45%
43%
66%
35%
-39%
193%
Sequential Read 256KB
510.9
286.2
-44%
953.5
87%
841.6
65%
485
-5%
283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=73)
-45%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
188%
Sequential Write 256KB
208.2
195.4
-6%
454.7
118%
484.7
133%
452
117%
192.9 ?(72.3 - 314, n=73)
-7%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
421%
Random Read 4KB
140.7
76.6
-46%
194.9
39%
170.6
21%
174.8
24%
82.6 ?(8.63 - 247, n=73)
-41%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
73%
Random Write 4KB
141.4
21.3
-85%
39.9
-72%
204.2
44%
146.2
3%
53.9 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=73)
-62%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
89%
Max. Load
 45 °C38.4 °C37.1 °C 
 45.1 °C40.4 °C37.5 °C 
 44.2 °C40.3 °C36.7 °C 
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 40.5 °C
32.6 °C35.3 °C43.6 °C
33.7 °C34.4 °C40.1 °C
33.5 °C34.8 °C37.2 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 36.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
99.6 (4.1min - 4.11max) %
Gigaset GX6
99.4 (3.63min - 3.65max) %
Nokia XR20
99.1 (1.747min - 1.763max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Gigaset GX6
99.7 (13.1min - 13.1max) % +1%
Nokia XR20
99.6 (5.86min - 5.89max) % +1%
CAT S53
99.1 (5.88min - 5.93max) %
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
99 (14.6min - 14.7max) % 0%

Legend

 
CAT S53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GX6 MediaTek Dimensity 900, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Nokia XR20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.635.72537.137.73128264032.933.85031.832.8632628.88022.927.210021.131.512523.734.416018.237.820013.341.925014.54731512.852.340011.455.750011.761.263010.96880015.275.6100012.280.1125012.881.4160010.976.9200010.974.9250011.674.531501273.1400012.972.7500013.681.6630014.383.1800015.177.31000015.773.11250016.569.21600017.469.4SPL25.489.9N0.779.1median 13.3median 73.1Delta2.311.345.643.140.236.733.430.631.232.93537.427.526.920.120.919.624.317.219.715.923.112.435.61249.710.256.210.159.78.763.415.270.516.372.215.674.813.174.511.173.311.57211.771.714.173.114.473.917.769.116.566.316.767.718.171.117.557.818.848.427.183.90.858.2median 15.2median 67.72.711.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCAT S53Nokia XR20
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
CAT S53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia XR20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
18h 55min
CAT S53
5500 mAh
CAT S52
3100 mAh
Gigaset GX6
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
Battery Runtime
-44%
-12%
-32%
-18%
WiFi v1.3
1135
637
-44%
1002
-12%
768
-32%
927
-18%
Reader / Idle
1321
1786
H.264
856
895
Load
266
301

Pros

+ 内置明亮的手电筒
+ 稳定和保护
+ 5G手机
+ 无PWM闪烁
+ 运行时间长
+ 真彩色屏幕
+ 无线充电

Cons

- 沉重而笨重
- 相机质量一般
- 负载下发热明显
- 不含充电器
- 过时的软件
- 蹩脚的内存

结论 - 笨重的户外手机,运行时间良好

在审查中:CAT S53。测试设备由以下单位提供:
在审查中:CAT S53。测试设备由以下单位提供:
数码港.com

CAT S53是一款经典的加固型手机,由于其笨重的机身,可以很好地防止环境影响和跌落。它配备了5G、NFC、无线充电和一个色彩准确的屏幕。

电池运行时间令人信服,指纹传感器和触摸屏工作可靠,明亮的集成手电筒使用户在黑暗环境中也能保持安全。另一方面,现在的每部智能手机都提供可永久激活的LED闪光灯,所以额外的手电筒最终可能只是一个漂亮的小玩意。

然而,过时的安全补丁和过时的Android 11对私人用户来说是很烦人的。制造商没有说明是否还计划进行更新。相机更适用于快照和记录过程,而不是真正的摄影爱好者,性能足够,但落后于其他同价位的户外手机。

环境影响让CAT S53很冷淡,由于有5G、NFC和大电池,设备还算不错。然而,在这个价格上有更苗条和更强大的替代品,没有噱头。

类似的强大电池运行时间几乎在任何地方都没有,但有更轻的手机,有更克制的设计,而三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro甚至可以让你更换电池。 吉格赛特GX6也有一个可拆卸的电池和一个快速的120赫兹显示屏。

价格和可用性

CAT S53可直接从制造商处获得https://www.catphones.com/de-de/cat-s53/价格为549欧元。在amazon.de上也能以这个价格找到这款坚固的手机。.

我们的借贷伙伴cyberport.de甚至还提供了一个很大的折扣,在测试时以476欧元的价格出售这款户外手机。在互联网上可以找到一些更便宜的报价。

CAT S53 - 04/17/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 72%
Weight
86%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
24 / 64 → 38%
Application Performance
60 / 86 → 70%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
48%
Average
73%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > CAT S53评测--具有5G功能的坚固防水手机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-04-19 (Update: 2023-04-19)