Oukitel RT2评测--用于建筑工地的极度坚固的户外平板电脑，配备巨型电池和LTE

Name: Oukitel RT2
Brand: Oukitel

坚固的标签，具有IP等级和MIL-STD-810。

通过RT2，Oukitel在平板电脑领域提供了一个有趣的利基，即户外领域。外壳非常坚固和防水，电池运行时间也非常好。此外，Oukitel的平板电脑在价格上对耐用型平板电脑很有吸引力。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/02/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Tablet

来自Oukitel的户外平板电脑配备了10.1英寸FHD+显示屏，依靠联发科芯片组和8GB DDR4X内存。除了对破坏性环境影响的高抵抗力外，Oukitel RT2还有另一个设备亮点--安装的电池容量非常大，达到20000毫安时。RT2甚至可以作为智能手机或智能手表的电源银行。

Test device courtesy of Oukitel

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Oukitel RT2 (RT Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT8788 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73 / A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Memory

8 GB

Display

10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Type C, Card Reader: microsSD up to 1TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-sensor, Compass (magnetic), Gyroscope , OTG, reverse charging, Miracast, FM radio

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM B5/B8/B3/B2; WCDMA: B1/B2/B4/B5/B8; FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28A/B28B/B66; TDD-LTE: B38/B39/B40/B41", Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.3 x 249.1 x 167.8

Battery

20000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.2,Samsung S5K3P3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, Samsung S5K2P7SX)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, charger, USB cable, hand belt, hardware hook, Oukitel UI, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, SAR value: 1.681 W/kg Body, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Weight

1.03 kg, Power Supply: 79 g

Price

330 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
77.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Oukitel RT2 Helio MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3	1 kg	17.3 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
82.5 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	465 g	7.45 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
80.5 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Teclast T40 Pro T618, Mali-G52 MP2	480 g	9.2 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 SD 860, Adreno 640	511 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Huawei MatePad 11 2021 SD 865, Adreno 650	485 g	7.25 mm	10.95"	2560x1600

外壳 - 具有IP等级的Oukitel平板电脑

Oukitel RT2的重点是高稳定性和耐久性。这款户外平板电脑的前者来自一个坚固的金属框架，该框架为其超过1000克（约2.2磅）的重量做出了贡献。另一方面，显示屏与表面的比率相当低，只有71%。

建造质量令人满意。外壳主要由塑料制成，根据IP-68/69K和MIL-STD-810H标准，它的高认证可以令人信服。阅读更多关于军事标准及其缺点的信息，请点击https://www.notebookcheck.com/Bekommt-die-Smartphone-Landschaft-mit-dem-MIL-STD-810-einen-neuen-Schutzstandard.396881.0.html.IP69K认证甚至可以保护Oukitel RT2在短距离高压清洗时不受热水影响。

尺寸比较

Oukitel RT2 Xiaomi Pad 5 Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Teclast T40 Pro DIN A5 ❌

特点 - 中档标签，带FM收音机

Oukitel RT2只配备了一种存储尺寸，即128GB。扣除操作系统后，仍有大约109GB可用。需要更多容量的用户可以通过不支持exFAT的microSD卡将存储空间扩大到1TB。另外，第二个卡槽可以让另一张SIM卡实现双重用途。

除了调频收音机和一个状态LED，这款户外平板电脑还支持通过Miracast和USB OTG进行无线传输。然后可以通过USB Type-C端口读取数据，例如用于播放视频资料，以及连接其他外部外围设备，如外部键盘。据Oukitel称，该USB端口应该可以提供高达500MBit/s的数据传输率。我们认为这里指的是2.0标准。

微型SD卡读卡器

集成的microSD插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准。结合我们的参考卡Angelbird AV PRO V60，该户外平板电脑在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现相当有说服力。然而，户外平板电脑的速度相当慢，拷贝速度不到15MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	40.3 MB/s +161%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.12 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	16.11 MB/s +4%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	15.42 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.6 (25.4-49.2)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.9 (28.3-49.3)

Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø77.2 (39.9-85.7)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.3 (29-81.4)

软件 - Oukitel RT2 withAndroid 12

Oukitel平板电脑基于12版本的Android ，该中国制造商将其与内部用户界面相结合。在测试时，安全更新是从2022年9月开始的，Widevine DRM级别是L3。Oukitel没有说明是否以及有多少重大的Android 更新将随之而来。

通信和GNSS - 带有LTE的Oukitel平板电脑

蓝牙4.2版本可用于无线通信--没有安装NFC芯片。集成的Wi-Fi模块支持符合a/b/g/n/ac的IEEE 802.11标准，因此理论上可以在2.4GHz和5GHz频率范围内运行。然而，我们只能在缓慢的2.4GHz频段测试Oukitel RT2，因为我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000不支持5GHz WLAN。因此，传输速度非常慢，而且在使用中也被证明有些不稳定--在测试中，WLAN模块经常失去与路由器的连接。

然而，这款户外平板电脑还可以通过最大的LTE Cat.7接入移动互联网。7，这要归功于一个4G调制解调器。这个国家所有流行的频段，包括20和28频段，都支持。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	902 (886^min - 925^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	635 (320^min - 652^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	780 (635^min - 867^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	538 (317^min - 618^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	347 (335^min - 351^max) MBit/s +623%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	322 (315^min - 326^max) MBit/s +571%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	48 (37^min - 46^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	346 (335^min - 360^max) MBit/s +845%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	346 (167^min - 354^max) MBit/s +845%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	36.6 (13^min - 61^max) MBit/s

Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø43.8 (37-46)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø538 (317-618)

Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø36.5 (13-61)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø624 (320-652)

Oukitel RT2使用GPS、BeiDou、Galileo和GLONASS卫星网络进行定位，但只使用单频。户外定位可以获得很好的精度，但定位时间相当长，而且低于平均水平，信噪比值低于30。

此外，我们还检查了在自行车旅行中的定位精度，并将结果与Garmin的Venu 2智能手表进行比较。由于我们的测试设备的GNSS测试总是被中止，我们无法提供Oukitel RT2的详细路线路线。

摄像机 - Oukitel RT2，带单摄像头

一个1600万像素的前置摄像头，光圈为f/2.4，位于显示屏的上框。作为平板电脑，照片的质量对于视频通话和快速自拍是绰绰有余的。Oukitel在色彩对比和曝光方面做得过头了，但前置摄像头仍能拍出可靠的照片。

后部还设有一个1600万像素的摄像头，光圈为f/2.2。在明亮的光线下，图片的清晰度和细节是可以使用的，但即使对于这个价格范围内的平板电脑来说，质量也是一般的。动态和锐度需要改进，曝光也不是这款户外平板电脑的优势。

然而，我们对色彩的再现感到有些惊讶--而且是以积极的方式。为了能够在最客观的条件下评估色彩再现，我们在X-Rite ColorChecker Passport的帮助下，在人工光线下对Oukitel RT2进行了额外的拍照。这些照片以相对真实的色彩再现让我们感到惊讶。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light Zoom 5x

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

附件和保修 - Oukitel平板电脑与电源适配器

这家中国制造商为其户外平板电脑配备了一个33瓦的电源，一条USB电缆和一个包括安装用具的腕带。

许可证保修期是12个月。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的Oukitel RT2

这款户外平板电脑有一个电容式触摸屏，具有令人信服的滑行特性。在精确度方面也没有什么可抱怨的，所以我们用手指的输入是准确实现的。然而，触摸屏的反应往往有点延迟，或者只在第二次尝试时才发挥作用。

二维面部识别可用于生物识别安全。识别速度相当快，但遗憾的是没有指纹传感器。

显示屏 - Oukitel平板电脑，采用IPS面板

10.1英寸IPS显示屏的分辨率为2K，像素密度略高于200 ppi。60赫兹的IPS面板的照度有些不均匀，但我们看不到任何明显的阴影。

有趣的是，Oukitel宣传其户外平板电脑的峰值亮度为350尼特。然而，我们在纯白的屏幕背景下测得的最大亮度为488cd/m²，显然更高。此外，我们在测试中用一定比例的暗区和亮区（APL18）检查面板的亮度。在这里，我们确定了类似的最大亮度为445cd/m²。

应该指出的是，尽管采用了LC技术，但我们可以确定频率非常高的闪烁，大约为300k Hz。在我们的时间抖动测试中，户外平板电脑的子像素表现出明显的闪烁。


402 cd/m²	423 cd/m²	427 cd/m²
410 cd/m²	447 cd/m²	464 cd/m²
425 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	488 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 447 cd/m²
Contrast: 758:1 (Black: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 10.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 10.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
88.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.71
CCT: 9577 K

	Oukitel RT2 IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Teclast T40 Pro IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Xiaomi Pad 5 IPS, 2560x1600, 11"	Huawei MatePad 11 2021 IPS, 2560x1600, 11"
Screen		40%	27%	23%	17%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	447	510 14%	433 -3%	491 10%	550 23%
Brightness (cd/m²)	438	480 10%	412 -6%	473 8%	515 18%
Brightness Distribution (%)	82	85 4%	86 5%	91 11%	90 10%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.59	0.49 17%	0.48 19%	0.87 -47%	0.96 -63%
Contrast (:1)	758	1041 37%	902 19%	564 -26%	573 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.1	1.8 82%	3 70%	1.9 81%	3.3 67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.8	3.7 77%	7.2 54%	4.1 74%	7.9 50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	10.6	2.2 79%	4.4 58%	3 72%	4.9 54%
Gamma	1.71 ^129%	2.17 ^101%	2.12 ^104%	2.21 ^100%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	9577 ^68%	6907 ^94%	7003 ^93%	7182 ^91%	7288 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

316400 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 316400 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 316400 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

光谱仪和CalMAN软件的分析显示，在工厂预设的色彩配置文件 "自然 "中，Delta-E与sRGB色彩空间的偏差强烈增加，为10.1（色彩）和10.6（灰度）。我们还注意到在灰度中出现了明显的蓝色偏移。黑值与最大亮度之比约为1:750，也低于IPS面板的平均水平。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.89 ms rise
20.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.57 ms rise
39.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.54 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

即使在多云的天空下，户外可读性对于户外平板电脑来说也不是真正令人信服的。反射无法通过达到的亮度水平得到补偿。一旦屏幕上出现反光，内容就难以辨认。然而，可视角度是一个很好的水平。

性能 - 采用联发科SoC的Oukitel平板电脑

Oukitel RT2基于联发科MT8788，这是一个以12纳米工艺制造的八核SoC。四个Cortex-A73核心面对一个Cortex-A53集群，用于省电任务。图形单元是一个 Mali-G72 MP3.

与8GB内存相结合，联发科的芯片组，几乎与 Helio P60T确保了坚实的系统性能。然而，这款户外平板电脑显示出一些挂起，而且动画看起来往往不流畅。

在我们的基准测试包中，相当弱的CPU单元在Geekbench中提供了较低的结果，特别是在单核中。在多核方面，安装在Oukitel's RT2中的芯片组的表现与 Helio G80.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	905 Points +220%
Average of class Tablet (103 - 2286, n=69, last 2 years)	894 Points +216%
Xiaomi Pad 5	784 Points +177%
Teclast T40 Pro	380 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	343 Points +21%
Average Mediatek MT8788 (283 - 299, n=2)	291 Points +3%
Oukitel RT2	283 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (303 - 10522, n=69, last 2 years)	3421 Points +148%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	3288 Points +138%
Xiaomi Pad 5	2768 Points +100%
Average Mediatek MT8788 (1382 - 1384, n=2)	1383 Points 0%
Oukitel RT2	1382 Points
Teclast T40 Pro	1303 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1247 Points -10%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	628715 Points +195%
Xiaomi Pad 5	575553 Points +170%
Average of class Tablet (126757 - 1247557, n=21, last 2 years)	454611 Points +113%
Teclast T40 Pro	240502 Points +13%
Oukitel RT2	213255 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	213255 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	211417 Points -1%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 27428, n=84, last 2 years)	12141 Points +88%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	11610 Points +80%
Xiaomi Pad 5	11318 Points +76%
Teclast T40 Pro	8364 Points +30%
Average Mediatek MT8788 (6445 - 7226, n=2)	6836 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	6583 Points +2%
Oukitel RT2	6445 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (227 - 2155, n=58, last 2 years)	959 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5	635 Points
Teclast T40 Pro	384 Points
Oukitel RT2	Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=67, last 2 years)	5769 Points +255%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	5276 Points +224%
Xiaomi Pad 5	5154 Points +217%
Teclast T40 Pro	2145 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	2134 Points +31%
Oukitel RT2	1627 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	1627 Points 0%
System
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	9624 Points +165%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=67, last 2 years)	8960 Points +147%
Xiaomi Pad 5	8805 Points +143%
Teclast T40 Pro	4863 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	4133 Points +14%
Oukitel RT2	3627 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	3627 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=67, last 2 years)	6800 Points +296%
Xiaomi Pad 5	5788 Points +237%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	5388 Points +214%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	2436 Points +42%
Oukitel RT2	1716 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	1716 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Pro	1608 Points -6%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)	15445 Points +833%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	11366 Points +587%
Xiaomi Pad 5	10293 Points +522%
Teclast T40 Pro	2063 Points +25%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1786 Points +8%
Oukitel RT2	1655 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	1655 Points 0%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=67, last 2 years)	1502 Points +30%
Xiaomi Pad 5	1346 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	1314 Points +14%
Teclast T40 Pro	1313 Points +14%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1186 Points +3%
Oukitel RT2	1152 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	1152 Points 0%

AImark - Score v2.x
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	119152 Points +1827%
Xiaomi Pad 5	46413 Points +651%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	6865 Points +11%
Oukitel RT2	6182 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	6182 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Pro	4695 Points -24%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76852, n=66, last 2 years)	16379 Points +358%
Oukitel RT2	3577 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	3577 Points 0%

VRMark - Amber Room
Oukitel RT2	1352 Score
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	1352 Score 0%
Average of class Tablet (n=1last 2 years)	1183 Score -12%

Legend

Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Mediatek MT8788

Average of class Tablet

然而，Oukitel RT2在图形测试中的表现并没有好多少。该 Mali G72 MP3在户外平板电脑中甚至经常被一个 Mali G52 MP2的胜过Teclast T40 Pro在GFXBench的图形测试中。但即使在3DMark的Wild Life基准测试中，其结果也只是与一台联想Tab M10 Plus第三代.

Performance rating: Percent
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal: offscreen Overall Score

Performance rating
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 ^-4! Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96.4 pt
Xiaomi Pad 5 ^-1! Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76.2 pt
Teclast T40 Pro ^-1! Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	36 pt
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	34.8 pt
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 ^-1! Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	33.5 pt

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1103 Points +490%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	970 Points +419%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	187 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	180 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	171 Points -9%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1116 Points +503%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	985 Points +432%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	185 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	182 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	176 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3823 Points +489%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3436 Points +429%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	709 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	691 Points +6%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	649 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3818 Points +485%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3428 Points +425%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	709 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	687 Points +5%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	653 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1456 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1384 Points +11%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1245 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1281 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1182 Points +8%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1098 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2783 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2587 Points +5%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2457 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +261%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +94%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps +26%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	31 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	206 fps +489%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps +426%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44 fps +26%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +17%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +242%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +205%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +11%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	127 fps +310%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +252%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	31 fps
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps -16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps -23%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps +275%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +233%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +25%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +8%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	12 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps +394%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +333%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -22%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps +322%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps +291%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps +30%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +27%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.4 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps +373%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +327%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	11 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -16%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +300%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +278%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +16%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4.5 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +678%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +567%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.2 fps +19%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2.7 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps +287%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +247%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8 fps +7%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.5 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +559%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +473%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +22%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps +6%
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.2 fps

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	403 Points

在浏览器基准测试中，这款户外平板电脑只成功地击败了联想Tab M10 Plus第三代，是比较中的最后一名。有趣的是，Oukitel RT2在两项webXPRT测试中都有问题，所以没有数值。

Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=71, last 2 years)	146.1 Points +301%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	73 Points +100%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	66.6 Points +83%
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)	36.435 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	36.4 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	32.868 Points -10%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	128.1 Points +98%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	112.9 Points +75%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)	75.3 Points +17%
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	64.6 Points 0%
Oukitel RT2	64.583 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	57.32 Points -11%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=60, last 2 years)	186 runs/min +635%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	65.5 runs/min +159%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	61.3 runs/min +142%
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)	25.3 runs/min
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	25.3 runs/min 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	21.8 runs/min -14%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=102, last 2 years)	40662 Points +296%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	28456 Points +177%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	24196 Points +136%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)	14722 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	12744 Points +24%
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)	10273 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788 (10032 - 10273, n=2)	10153 Points -1%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)	3874.26 ms *
Average Mediatek MT8788 (n=1)	3874 ms * -0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	3227.4 ms * +17%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)	2762 ms * +29%
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)	2662 ms * +31%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	1933 ms * +50%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	1603 ms * +59%

* ... smaller is better

户外平板电脑的UFS 2.1存储，现在已经有点过时了，在我们的AndroBench基准测量中表现稳定。与一个小米Pad 5Oukitel RT2的读取和写入速度明显较低。

	Oukitel RT2	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	Teclast T40 Pro	Xiaomi Pad 5	Huawei MatePad 11 2021	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-27%	-18%	131%	163%	46%	260%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	509.78	393.23 -23%	260.9 -49%	1459 186%	1468 188%	761 ?(427 - 1043, n=115) 49%	1663 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=89, last 2 years) 226%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	198.25	234.88 18%	199.2 0%	534 169%	708 257%	296 ?(13.6 - 719, n=115) 49%	1216 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=89, last 2 years) 513%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	98.29	75.12 -24%	94.2 -4%	208.7 112%	190.7 94%	154 ?(92.6 - 241, n=115) 57%	236 ?(20.1 - 475, n=89, last 2 years) 140%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	102.22	23.97 -77%	83.6 -18%	158.9 55%	217.5 113%	130.4 ?(18.2 - 290, n=115) 28%	268 ?(9.1 - 989, n=89, last 2 years) 162%

游戏--Oukitel平板电脑可管理60帧画面

使用游戏本测试应用程序，我们看一下 Mali-G72使用Play Store中的游戏进行更详细的测试。在这里，GPU管理的最大帧率接近面板的原生60 Hz标志--至少是暂时的。然而，由于图形单元功率不足，只有在图形要求不高的游戏中才能达到这些，如Armajet。

图形要求高的游戏，如高清的PUBG Mobile ，可以在户外平板电脑上流畅地玩，但它停在30帧。不可能以最佳显示质量，即UltraHD播放射击游戏。赛车游戏《Asphalt 9 Legends》在测试中也达到了30帧，但大量的帧率下降是部分明显的。

Oukitel RT2; Armajet: Ø52.9 (39-60)

Oukitel RT2; Asphalt 9: Legends: Ø28.9 (12-31)

Oukitel RT2; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.8 (24-31)

Oukitel RT2; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Oukitel RT2; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.8 (25-31)

排放--户外平板电脑保持凉爽

温度

即使在负载下，户外平板电脑的表面温度也很难察觉。因此，Oukitel RT2在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中毫不意外地显示出非常连续的性能。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.81 (3.77-3.85)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.1 (4.03-4.12)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.7 (22.7-22.9)

Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.109 (1.1-1.122)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.038 (1.025-1.051)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø6.66 (6.65-6.67)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø4.25 (4.24-4.25)

Max. Load

Idle


30 °C	30.2 °C	35 °C
29.5 °C	29.3 °C	32.1 °C
28.7 °C	28.8 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 30.4 °C


29 °C	31.6 °C	32.6 °C
29.4 °C	29.7 °C	30.1 °C
28.6 °C	28.8 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 32.6 °C
Average: 29.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

演讲者

Oukitel的这款平板电脑有两个扬声器，可以提供立体声，但无法真正跟上中端价格段的平板电脑竞争对手的丰富音效。特别是低频范围几乎没有出现在RT2的声音中。高音也明显崩溃了。

有线耳机可以通过USB Type-C端口连接到户外平板电脑上。另外，蓝牙4.2也可用于无线传输。这里有一个相当有限的编解码器，包括SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oukitel RT2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - Oukitel RT2平板电脑

能源消耗

能量由一个20,000毫安时容量的电池提供。当完全耗尽时，它可以在大约3.5小时内用附带的33瓦电源适配器进行充电。Oukitel RT2的功耗与竞争对手的水平相似。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.19 Watt
Idle	1.47 / 3.99 / 4.08 Watt
Load	5.5 / 8.94 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oukitel RT2 20000 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 7500 mAh	Teclast T40 Pro 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11 2021 7250 mAh
Power Consumption		2%	-4%	-7%	-19%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.47	0.94 36%	1.44 2%	0.99 33%	1.33 10%
Idle Average * (Watt)	3.99	4.22 -6%	3.87 3%	4.2 -5%	5.37 -35%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	4.08	4.37 -7%	3.91 4%	4.22 -3%	5.41 -33%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.5	6.12 -11%	7.1 -29%	7.88 -43%	6.87 -25%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	8.94	9.14 -2%	8.88 1%	10.63 -19%	10.08 -13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788: Ø4.31 (2.28-8.75)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860: Ø5.81 (2.06-10.2)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4 (3.76-4.59)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.83 (4-8.78)

Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.32 (2.28-2.39)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.88 (1.838-2.2)

电池寿命

在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中，这款户外平板电脑在调整后的150cd/m²的显示亮度下持续了21小时以上。这是一个很好的速度，但我们本来期望相对于极其庞大的电池而言，能有更多的耐力。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 104)		21h 13min

	Oukitel RT2 20000 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 7500 mAh	Teclast T40 Pro 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11 2021 7250 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	21.2	15.2 -28%	13.4 -37%	12.2 -42%	13.9 -34%

Pros

+ 运行时间长

+ 高保护标准

+ LTE和GPS

Cons

- 重量高

- 蹩脚的WLAN，连接中断

- 平庸的扬声器

- 薄弱的SoC

判决书

鉴于10.1英寸平板电脑的重量非常高，Oukitel RT2可能只会吸引一群绝对需要高度耐用的人。然而，由于IP-68/69K和MIL-STD-810G认证以及庞大的结构，这款户外平板电脑占据了一个利基市场，这可能使它成为建筑工地使用的一个有趣的选择，除此之外，尽管有现有的缺点。那些可以不使用防震和防水外壳的人，最好使用小米Pad 5或华为MatePad 11.