Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 评测--配备大面积显示屏的可折叠手机

时髦乘以五 这款小巧的可折叠智能手机在外观上更上一层楼，包括配备了更大的外部显示屏、现代的 SoC 处理器和额外的存储空间。在这篇评测中，您可以了解到为什么有时 "少即是多"。
5G Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 是继Galaxy Z Flip4的后继机型，其最大的视觉差异在于外部显示屏更大。此外，以前折叠手机时会出现的小缝隙现在也得到了修复。

在这篇评测中，您可以了解到这款可折叠智能手机的其他功能，以及从 Flip4 升级是否有意义。

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Galaxy Z Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.70 inch 22:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 426 PPI, capacitive, Dynamic AMOLED, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Infinity Flex; Cover Display: 3.4", Super AMOLED, 60 Hz, 720 x 748 px, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 216 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, geomagnetic sensor, Proximity, Hall, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 165.1 x 71.9
Battery
3700 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 1.8 µm, 83°, Dual Pixel AF, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 1.12 µm, 123°); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, 1.22 µm, 85°)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-C cable, SIM tool, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), QZSS; DRM Widevine L1, Body-SAR: 1.451 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.601 W/kg; IPX8, fanless, waterproof
Weight
187 g
Price
1199 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.9 %
08/2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		187 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
87 %
06/2023
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		188.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"2640x1080
87.9 %
10/2022
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2640x1080
86.1 %
03/2022
Huawei P50 Pocket
SD 888 4G, Adreno 660		190 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"2790x1188
88.7 %
07/2023
Asus Zenfone 10
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		172 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash5.90"2400x1080

Galaxy Z Flip5 的尺寸与前代产品几乎完全相同，只是在折叠闭合时更薄了两毫米（85.1 x 71.9 x 15.1 毫米）。这要归功于新的柔性铰链，它可以使手机在折叠闭合时四角平齐。由于采用了小塑料垫片，所以仍有微小的缝隙，可能会让灰尘颗粒进入。

在测试中，Galaxy Z Flip5 的做工给我们留下了深刻印象。它的缝隙尺寸均匀，装甲铝看起来非常优质和稳定。机身外部由康宁大猩猩 Glas Victus 2 保护，这款可折叠的三星手机还具有防水功能（IPX8 认证）。只是当手机折叠打开时要小心弯曲，因为它会发出咔嚓咔嚓的声音，而且铰链允许相当大的移动。

柔性铰链的灵活开启角度尤其出色，可以在 44 至 180 度之间非常稳定地固定显示屏。Flip5 有薄荷色、石墨色、薰衣草色和奶油色可供选择。三星专卖店独有色（灰色、蓝色、绿色和黄色）均采用黑色哑光铝合金边框。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较 (folded open)

❌
170.8 mm 74 mm 7 mm 188.5 g170 mm 75.5 mm 7.2 mm 190 g165.2 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g165.1 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g146.5 mm 68 mm 9.4 mm 172 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

尺寸比较 (folded shut)

❌
88.4 mm 74 mm 15.1 mm 188.5 g87.3 mm 75.5 mm 15.2 mm 190 g84.9 mm 71.9 mm 17.1 mm 187 g85.1 mm 71.9 mm 15.1 mm 187 g

连接性 - 现在包括 USB 3.2

不同于其 不同的是现在，这款三星手机的内部存储容量至少为 256GB，但价格也要高出约 100 美元。现在还有一个 512 GB 的版本。这款手机没有 microSD 卡插槽。

Galaxy Z Flip5 现在采用了速度更快的 USB 3.2（gen 1）。在我们的拷贝测试中，它的传输速率仅为平均水平（217 MB/s），但仍比 USB 2.0 快很多。

这款手机还配备了 NFC 和蓝牙 5.3，但遗憾的是，您仍然不能使用 UWB。

顶部（折叠打开）：麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部（折叠打开）：麦克风
左（折叠打开）：SIM（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左侧（折叠打开）：SIM 卡
右侧（折叠打开）：音量、电源/指纹（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
右侧（折叠打开）：音量、电源/指纹
底部（折叠打开）：扬声器、USB、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部（折叠打开）：扬声器、USB、麦克风
顶部（折叠闭合）（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
顶部（折叠闭合）
左（折叠闭合）（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左（折叠闭合）
右（折叠闭合）（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右侧（折叠闭合）
底部（折叠闭合）（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部（折叠闭合）

软件 - 改进操作的外部显示屏

Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 使用Android 13 和三星用户界面 One UI 5.1.1，在测试时，该界面已安装了从 2023 年 8 月 1 日开始的最新安全补丁。这种情况将持续相当长的一段时间，因为这款可折叠手机将在四年内每月接收这些补丁，之后每季度接收一次，持续一年。此外，Flip5 还将进行四次重大升级，即Android 17。

外部显示屏的软件升级幅度最大：它现在不仅更大了，而且还有一个带有新部件的全电容式触摸屏。遗憾的是，我们无法在这块显示屏上原生运行所有应用程序，但你可以运行谷歌地图和 WhatsApp 等应用程序。在小键盘的帮助下，你实际上可以通过外屏直接回复 Messenger 消息。你只需通过实验室激活这项功能即可。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Z Flip5 具有精确的定位服务

三星Galaxy Z Flip5 支持 Wi-Fi 6E，因此支持三频 WLAN 连接。配合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，这款手机通过 5.0 和 6.0 GHz 实现了高稳定的传输速率。

在使用移动数据时，三星智能手机支持所有常用的移动网络标准，并能访问各种频段。在我们的测试中，该设备在较大的城市也没有出现接收困难的情况，我们完全没有什么可抱怨的。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
942 (min: 480) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
906 (min: 454) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1768 (min: 918) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1576 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1343 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
835 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
908 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
927 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
766 (min: 735) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
824 (min: 425) MBit/s ∼89%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1492 (min: 1309) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1334 (min: 1068) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
631 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
665 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1508 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1369 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼87%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1738 (918-1821)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1343 (863-1571)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1208-1634)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (676-1018)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (480-957)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (454-945)
GPS 测试：户外
室外
GPS 测试：室内
室内

三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 可以访问所有常用的卫星网络，以确定您的位置，甚至可以在室内相对较快地确定您的位置。在室外，这几乎是瞬间完成的，而且非常准确。

在一次小型自行车旅行中，我们将三星手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。在近 10 公里的测试路线上，两款设备的偏差都只有 30 米。健身智能手表可能更精确一些，但 Flip5 绝对还是能够很好地记录我们的路线。

全球导航卫星系统环湖测试之旅
全球导航卫星系统环湖测试之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

电话功能和通话质量

带键盘的小工具
带键盘的小工具
收藏联系人小工具
收藏联系人小工具

在我们的测试中，Galaxy Z Flip5 的语音质量听起来非常自然，背景噪音被可靠地过滤掉了。特别是在许多人的包围中，通话者听不到这些声音。三星智能手机在免提通话时会有轻微的回响，但在视频通话时不会出现这种情况。

支持 WLAN 电话和 VoLTE 等功能。通过外部显示屏也可以在一定程度上控制通话：您可以通过 widget 直接访问联系人列表，也可以使用键盘，还可以在另一个 widget 上存储多达六个收藏夹。

摄像头 - 出色的双摄像头和便捷的前置取景器

主相机肖像
主相机肖像
通过前置摄像头自拍
通过前置摄像头自拍

Galaxy Z Flip5 的传统前置摄像头位于内侧，在可折叠显示屏上方。使用该镜头拍摄的照片效果一般，但足以满足视频通话的需要。如果使用手机的主摄像头，自拍效果会更好。外部显示屏可以用作取景器。在日常使用中，这样做效果很好，照片看起来也更好。我们不完全理解为什么在这种情况下视频会被限制在 60 FPS 和全高清，因为据说所有摄像头都支持高达 60 FPS 的超高清。

从技术上看，双摄像头与Galaxy Z Flip4相同，但由于采用了更强大的 IPS，它们显然能拍摄出更好的照片。在日光下，三星手机拍摄的照片色彩鲜艳。它的超广角镜头还不错，但在拍摄边缘时，图像容易变得有点模糊，而且会出现一些图像错误。手机变焦最大为 2 倍，超过 2 倍就无法使用了。数码变焦最大可达 10 倍。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
ColorChecker
7.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G: 6.57 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G: 4.88 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 11.48 ∆E

交货范围和保修 -Galaxy 智能手机采用超薄包装盒包装

Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 仅配备 SIM 卡工具和 USB-C 数据线。无线和有线电源适配器以及各种保护套可从三星或第三方供应商处购买。

Flip5 在美国的保修期为一年，可通过三星Care+ 延长保修期。保险套餐延长保修期，价格在 129 美元至 329 美元之间。

输入设备和操作 - Flip5 有一个小键盘

Galaxy Z Flip5 的两块触摸屏在我们的测试中都表现得非常可靠，没有出现任何问题。由于外屏的刷新率仅为 60 Hz，因此动画看起来并不像手机内屏那样如丝般顺滑。可在小屏幕上使用的适配键盘实际上效果不错。只是遗憾的是，显示屏无法适应设备的定位。

电源按钮内的指纹传感器负责生物识别安全。虽然建议您在旋转传感器时再用手指触摸扫描仪一次，因为当手机折叠关闭时，它有时会不那么准确。您还可以使用面部识别功能，与Pixel Fold 不同的是，您可以在手机折叠关闭或打开时使用面部识别功能。另一方面，它的安全性稍差。

显示屏 - OLED，亮度高达 1,666 cd/m²

子像素阵列（可折叠显示屏）
子像素阵列（可折叠显示屏）
子像素阵列（封面显示）
子像素阵列（封面显示）

Galaxy Z Flip5 的可折叠显示屏与 Flip4 大小相同。Flip4在显示纯白色并由环境光传感器控制时，亮度仅为最低。在这种情况下，平均亮度为 848 cd/m²，峰值为 1,666 cd/m²（APL18）。如果手动控制亮度，手机亮度可达 415 cd/m²；如果使用额外亮度设置，亮度可达 705 cd/m²。

较小的封面显示屏亮度更高一些（纯白描述、主动式环境光传感器）--画面中央的亮度可达 947 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量中，它的亮度略有下降，仅达到 1,296 cd/m² - 低于三星宣称的显示屏可达到的 1,600 nits。如果没有传感器，亮度可达到 409 cd/m²。

封面显示屏的 OLED 闪烁器
封面显示屏的 OLED 闪烁器

Galaxy Z Flip5 的显示屏还显示出 OLED 闪烁的迹象，这在这种屏幕类型中很典型。在我们的测试中，这款可折叠面板显示出非常稳定的 120 Hz 频率，虽然频率不一定很高，但它的调制程度很低，振幅也很均匀，这就是为什么只有极少数人可能会对屏幕产生问题。这可能只会对极度敏感的人造成问题。封面显示屏则有些不同：这里的频率较高，但振幅曲线非常不稳定，调制程度更高，会让眼睛感到疲劳。

853
cd/m²		836
cd/m²		849
cd/m²
857
cd/m²		836
cd/m²		852
cd/m²
860
cd/m²		835
cd/m²		855
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3 - Foldable Screen
Maximum: 860 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 848.1 cd/m² Minimum: 0.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 836 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.70		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Super AMOLED, 720x748, 3.40		Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.90		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.70		Huawei P50 Pocket
Foldable OLED, 2790x1188, 6.90		Asus Zenfone 10
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.90
Screen
7%
-53%
17%
12%
-16%
Brightness middle
836
947
13%
849
2%
795
-5%
780
-7%
797
-5%
Brightness
848
915
8%
830
-2%
800
-6%
768
-9%
789
-7%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
96
-1%
97
0%
96
-1%
93
-4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
3.02
-16%
1
62%
1.1
58%
3.64
-40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
7.61
-69%
2.5
44%
3.1
31%
1.92
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
5.3
-231%
1.5
6%
1.6
-0%
3.1
-94%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.198 100%
2.37 93%
2.23 99%
2.238 98%
CCT
6319 103%
6338 103%
6466 101%
6483 100%
6531 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19014 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列（可折叠显示屏）

我们使用 Calman 分析了Galaxy Z Flip5 在可折叠屏幕上显示色彩的准确度。使用自然屏幕模式可以获得最佳效果，该模式使用 sRGB 色彩空间，只有在蓝色部分较大时才会明显偏离目标色彩。因此，显示屏的校准效果仍然很好，但准确度略低于 Flip4.

灰度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.005 ms rise
↘ 0.777 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.716 ms rise
↘ 0.703 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.6 ms).

Galaxy Z Flip5 在户外给人留下了良好的印象，即使在明亮的日子里也能轻松阅读。

我们喜欢可折叠显示屏的视角稳定性，但在轻微的角度下已经可以看到微弱的绿色雾影。不过，这在日常使用中不会造成困扰。

室外
室外
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Flip5 内的骁龙 8 代Galaxy

使用骁龙 8 代 2GalaxyGalaxy Z Flip5 采用了目前最快的 SoC，由于主频提升较小，它甚至应该比普通机型稍快一些。然而，通常情况并非如此，尤其是在需要大量性能的时候--很可能是由于散热太弱。

不过，三星智能手机在基准测试中取得了不错的成绩，这也反映在流畅的系统性能上。

Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 | Geekbench 6.1 - 6.2 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference | AImark
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1542 - 1598, n=5)
1562 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1542 Points ∼99%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1462 Points ∼94% -5%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1294 Points ∼83% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1265 Points ∼81% -18%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
1099 Points ∼70% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 1885, n=238, last 2 years)
836 Points ∼54% -46%
Multi-Core
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4999 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (4906 - 5082, n=5)
4981 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4955 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3987 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3921 Points ∼78% -21%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
2944 Points ∼59% -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 5538, n=238, last 2 years)
2687 Points ∼54% -46%
Geekbench 6.1 - 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2040 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1999 - 2079, n=3)
2039 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2021 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2104, n=32, last 2 years)
1156 Points ∼57% -43%
Multi-Core
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5496 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (5228 - 5534, n=3)
5382 Points ∼98% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5228 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 5648, n=32, last 2 years)
3040 Points ∼55% -42%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1308479 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1086936 - 1226224, n=6)
1151047 Points ∼88% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1086936 Points ∼83%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
950618 Points ∼73% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
923552 Points ∼71% -15%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
784775 Points ∼60% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1322448, n=166, last 2 years)
682486 Points ∼52% -37%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17824 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
17002 Points ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (15270 - 17002, n=6)
16007 Points ∼90% -6%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15101 Points ∼85% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14611 Points ∼82% -14%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
11897 Points ∼67% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 28378, n=229, last 2 years)
10927 Points ∼61% -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1266 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1120 - 1332, n=6)
1236 Points ∼98% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1120 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1106 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1356, n=156, last 2 years)
791 Points ∼62% -29%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
749 Points ∼59% -33%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9679 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8541 - 9337, n=6)
8886 Points ∼92% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8541 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
8243 Points ∼85% -3%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6349 Points ∼66% -26%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
6265 Points ∼65% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 9679, n=166, last 2 years)
5243 Points ∼54% -39%
System
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15148 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14188 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
13563 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1374 - 14401, n=6)
11979 Points ∼79% -16%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
10283 Points ∼68% -28%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10052 Points ∼66% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 19657, n=166, last 2 years)
9025 Points ∼60% -36%
Memory
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10650 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8467 - 9212, n=6)
8832 Points ∼83% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8629 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7541 Points ∼71% -13%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
6493 Points ∼61% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=166, last 2 years)
5681 Points ∼53% -34%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5461 Points ∼51% -37%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (21505 - 31928, n=6)
27676 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
26616 Points ∼96% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
23875 Points ∼86% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
21505 Points ∼78%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
19247 Points ∼70% -10%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
14837 Points ∼54% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 31928, n=166, last 2 years)
11779 Points ∼43% -45%
Web
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2044 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2021 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1998 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1584 - 2032, n=6)
1846 Points ∼90% -9%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
1554 Points ∼76% -23%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1538 Points ∼75% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=166, last 2 years)
1461 Points ∼71% -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
82677 Points ∼100% +409%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=126, last 2 years)
22280 Points ∼27% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16235 Points ∼20%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15827 Points ∼19% -3%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14826 Points ∼18% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1267 - 16702, n=6)
13861 Points ∼17% -15%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 128240, n=66, last 2 years)
12745 Points ∼100%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1422 Points ∼11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1216 - 1320, n=4)
1280 Points ∼10%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
887 Points ∼7%

Galaxy Z Flip5 安装的 Adreno 740 是Android 智能手机最快的图形处理器。虽然新 SoC 的性能可能比其前代 前代但在大多数测试中，它的表现都不尽如人意。在这里，其薄弱的散热似乎也是限制因素。

3DMark: Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5414 Points ∼100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5563 Points ∼100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3717 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3496 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2798 Points ∼75% -20%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1947 Points ∼52% -44%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1232 Points ∼33% -65%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3749 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3090 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2867 Points ∼76% -7%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2001 Points ∼53% -35%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1253 Points ∼33% -59%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11201 Points ∼100% +14%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10853 Points ∼97% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9805 Points ∼88%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4542 Points ∼41% -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5825 Points ∼100%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4539 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4211 Points ∼72% -28%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20215 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13986 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9323 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13051 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9166 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7544 Points ∼58% -42%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps ∼98% -2%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps ∼51% -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
496 fps ∼100%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
481 fps ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
354 fps ∼71% -29%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
344 fps ∼69% -31%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
202 fps ∼41% -59%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps ∼100%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps ∼88% -12%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼48% -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps ∼85%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps ∼54% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps ∼39% -54%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps ∼33% -61%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps ∼100%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps ∼65% -35%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
212 fps ∼95%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps ∼47% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps ∼43% -54%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps ∼27% -71%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps ∼65%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼54% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps ∼47% -28%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼31% -53%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
130 fps ∼100% +94%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼55% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps ∼47% -9%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼34% -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼70% -30%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps ∼28% -72%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps ∼84%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼71% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼55% -35%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps ∼32% -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps ∼73%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps ∼63% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps ∼53% -28%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼28% -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
155 fps ∼100% +85%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps ∼59% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼46% -15%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps ∼32% -40%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps ∼100%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps ∼91% -9%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps ∼56% -44%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (158.6 - 192.3, n=6)
173 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115)
163.005 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)
148.098 Points ∼86% -9%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
136.238 Points ∼79% -16%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
100.523 Points ∼58% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (17.3 - 282, n=170, last 2 years)
91 Points ∼53% -44%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115)
180 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 185, n=6)
159.7 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
139 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (chrome 105)
128 Points ∼71% -29%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
98 Points ∼54% -46%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 202, n=114, last 2 years)
91.7 Points ∼51% -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (55459 - 62837, n=6)
59694 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
55459 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)
52566 Points ∼88% -5%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
42998 Points ∼72% -22%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
39146 Points ∼66% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 74261, n=202, last 2 years)
30421 Points ∼51% -45%
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1)
21748 Points ∼36% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1)
1938 ms * ∼100% -149%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 9999, n=170, last 2 years)
1888 ms * ∼97% -142%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
1009 ms * ∼52% -29%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
909.8 ms * ∼47% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105)
855.35 ms * ∼44% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
779.8 ms * ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 780, n=6)
699 ms * ∼36% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5GMotorola Razr 40 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5GHuawei P50 PocketAsus Zenfone 10Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
21%
-22%
-13%
69%
37%
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
3412.35
1816.8
-47%
1598.77
-53%
1839
-46%
3517.3
3%
3527 ?(3249 - 4384, n=12)
3%
1228 ?(215 - 4512, n=234, last 2 years)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
2289.61
1352.6
-41%
987.09
-57%
575
-75%
3041.5
33%
2429 ?(1014 - 2887, n=12)
6%
815 ?(57.5 - 3062, n=234, last 2 years)
-64%
Random Read 4KB
444.6
362
-19%
308.23
-31%
263.5
-41%
418.1
-6%
413 ?(368 - 460, n=12)
-7%
215 ?(22.2 - 543, n=234, last 2 years)
-52%
Random Write 4KB
161.87
472.3
192%
245.94
52%
342.1
111%
559.4
246%
399 ?(152.9 - 552, n=12)
146%
225 ?(13 - 572, n=235, last 2 years)
39%

排放物 - Flip5 会变得非常热

温度

在负载情况下，三星Galaxy Z Flip5 会变得非常热。在温暖的日子里，这尤其会成为一个问题。由于我们现在使用的是要求苛刻的 Burnout 基准测试，而不是稳定性测试，因此无法将这些数值与前代产品进行比较。

三星只对 SoC 进行了部分降温--在连续负载的情况下，我们注意到性能下降了 60% 以上，这意味着 Flip5 的速度几乎比Razr+ ，后者依赖于较旧的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 。

Max. Load
 56 °C51.3 °C33.2 °C 
 55.9 °C55.8 °C32.9 °C 
 56 °C50.4 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 47.1 °C
30.8 °C47.7 °C53 °C
31.5 °C45.9 °C53.6 °C
28.5 °C47.2 °C50.9 °C
Maximum: 53.6 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % ∼100% +160%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.2 % ∼63% +65%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.3 % ∼59% +55%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45.3 % ∼45% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.3 % ∼38%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % ∼100% +135%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 % ∼70% +64%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.4 % ∼69% +62%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.9 % ∼54% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34.8 % ∼43%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.61 (7.69-22.1)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.31 (7.34-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.4 (9.59-17)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø33.8 (28.3-73.9)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.1 (28.6-45.2)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.4 (29.3-64.7)

发言人

SamsungGalaxy Z Flip5 上的两个扬声器可提供不错的音效，但高音在高音量时有些吃力，而且听起来有相当尖锐的倾向。

有线扬声器和耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。蓝牙可用于无线传输，但只支持最常见的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.936.22522.328.63123.227.34025.4305031.132.86320298017.830.110017.53112517.338.31601551.720015.153.625016.356.231513.561.540013.963.950013.46863013.368.280011.77110001473.312501475.2160013.377.420001378.7250013.580.9315014.381.3400013.480.3500014.778.4630013.676.2800014.173.81000014701250014.268.11600013.864.6SPL25.889.6N0.777.1median 14median 71Delta0.79.136.238.737.538.330.632.434.532.937.141.930.944.717.225.720.230.418.83617.241.912.145.713.351.512.655.610.156.310.560.110.563.712.964.211.667.915.469.211.470.91170.411.370.31265.112.965.713.469.414.166.714.962.515.757.716.565.117.356.325.379.70.644.7median 12.9median 63.72.57.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5GMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%

电池寿命：3,700 毫安时，可持续使用 10 小时以上

耗电量

Galaxy Z Flip5 的功耗很低，没有任何值得批评的地方。这款智能手机支持高达 25 瓦的快速充电和无线充电 (Qi)。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.44 / 0.69 / 0.91 Watt
Load midlight 6.61 / 6.72 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh		Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
3700 mAh		Huawei P50 Pocket
4000 mAh		Asus Zenfone 10
4300 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-49%
7%
-94%
-62%
-93%
-56%
Idle Minimum *
0.44
0.9
-105%
0.56
-27%
1.33
-202%
0.9
-105%
1.264 ?(0.44 - 3.17, n=7)
-187%
0.876 ?(0.12 - 2.37, n=166, last 2 years)
-99%
Idle Average *
0.69
1.1
-59%
0.71
-3%
1.77
-157%
1.1
-59%
1.597 ?(0.69 - 3.68, n=7)
-131%
1.491 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=166, last 2 years)
-116%
Idle Maximum *
0.91
1.3
-43%
0.79
13%
1.89
-108%
1.5
-65%
1.726 ?(0.83 - 3.91, n=7)
-90%
1.699 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=166, last 2 years)
-87%
Load Average *
6.61
5.5
17%
3.59
46%
4.25
36%
7.6
-15%
7.35 ?(3.99 - 15.8, n=7)
-11%
4.55 ?(2.1 - 10.9, n=166, last 2 years)
31%
Load Maximum *
6.72
10.3
-53%
6.45
4%
9.19
-37%
11
-64%
9.96 ?(6.16 - 15.9, n=7)
-48%
7.4 ?(3.56 - 13.7, n=166, last 2 years)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.24 (0.85-14.1)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.59 (0.854-10)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.68 (0.604-1.264)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.898-1.231)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.81 (6.05-9.54)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.2 (5.29-11.3)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.68 (0.604-1.264)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.898-1.231)

运行时间

在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下浏览网页时，Galaxy Z Flip5 的续航时间远远超过 10 小时，因此与 Flip4 不相上下。Flip4或Razr+.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 115)
10h 47min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh
647 min ∼77%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh
669 min ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
3700 mAh
657 min ∼78%
Huawei P50 Pocket
4000 mAh
482 min ∼58%
Asus Zenfone 10
4300 mAh
837 min ∼100%

Pros

+ 小巧的可折叠智能手机
+ 大尺寸外部显示屏
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速 SoC ...

Cons

- ......在负载情况下会受到很大限制
- 无 Wi-Fi 7
- 蓝牙音频编解码器数量少
- 在负载情况下会发热

评语 -Galaxy Z Flip5 显示出巨大进步

三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。
三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。

Galaxy Z Flip5 在 Flip4 上仍饱受诟病，而三星则在此基础上进行了大量改进：现在，它配备了快速 USB 3.2 连接，支持 6 GHz WLAN，折叠在一起时会自动关闭，并支持双频 GNSS。除此之外，这款手机还在外部配备了一块全新的、更大的显示屏，确实为该设备增色不少。

三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 在很多方面都有所改进，因此，它被证明是一款非常出色的可折叠智能手机。

但另一方面，三星并没有设法消除手机外壳的多余热量，其蓝牙音频编解码器也没有得到改进。此外，您还将不得不忍受没有 UWB 的情况。令人遗憾的是，三星未能改善设备的重量。

如果您正在考虑购买Galaxy Z Flip5，那么您可以期待获得一款出色的可折叠智能手机--但是，这一切都需要付出代价：它的发布价格与Razr+.Z Flip5 的前身要便宜得多，但它的盖板显示屏也要小得多。它的 OPPO Find N2 Flip也是一个有趣的替代品，但并不是每个国家都能买到。

价格和供应情况

Galaxy Z Flip5 可直接从Samsung 购买。售价为 999.99 美元。

在亚马逊上也能以同样的价格买到。

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G - 08/18/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
52%
Weight
89%
Battery
89 / 86 → 100%
Display
92%
Games Performance
57%
Application Performance
94 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
79%
Noise
100%
Audio
79%
Camera
77%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 评测--配备大面积显示屏的可折叠手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-08-22 (Update: 2023-08-22)