三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 评测--配备大面积显示屏的可折叠手机
三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 是继Galaxy Z Flip4的后继机型,其最大的视觉差异在于外部显示屏更大。此外,以前折叠手机时会出现的小缝隙现在也得到了修复。
在这篇评测中,您可以了解到这款可折叠智能手机的其他功能,以及从 Flip4 升级是否有意义。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % | 08/2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 187 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
87 % | 06/2023 | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 188.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" | 2640x1080 | |
87.9 % | 10/2022 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 187 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
86.1 % | 03/2022 | Huawei P50 Pocket SD 888 4G, Adreno 660 | 190 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" | 2790x1188 | |
88.7 % | 07/2023 | Asus Zenfone 10 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 172 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 5.90" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 -Galaxy Z Flip5 配备了全新的柔性铰链
Galaxy Z Flip5 的尺寸与前代产品几乎完全相同,只是在折叠闭合时更薄了两毫米(85.1 x 71.9 x 15.1 毫米)。这要归功于新的柔性铰链,它可以使手机在折叠闭合时四角平齐。由于采用了小塑料垫片,所以仍有微小的缝隙,可能会让灰尘颗粒进入。
在测试中,Galaxy Z Flip5 的做工给我们留下了深刻印象。它的缝隙尺寸均匀,装甲铝看起来非常优质和稳定。机身外部由康宁大猩猩 Glas Victus 2 保护,这款可折叠的三星手机还具有防水功能(IPX8 认证)。只是当手机折叠打开时要小心弯曲,因为它会发出咔嚓咔嚓的声音,而且铰链允许相当大的移动。
柔性铰链的灵活开启角度尤其出色,可以在 44 至 180 度之间非常稳定地固定显示屏。Flip5 有薄荷色、石墨色、薰衣草色和奶油色可供选择。三星专卖店独有色(灰色、蓝色、绿色和黄色)均采用黑色哑光铝合金边框。
连接性 - 现在包括 USB 3.2
不同于其 不同的是现在,这款三星手机的内部存储容量至少为 256GB,但价格也要高出约 100 美元。现在还有一个 512 GB 的版本。这款手机没有 microSD 卡插槽。
Galaxy Z Flip5 现在采用了速度更快的 USB 3.2(gen 1)。在我们的拷贝测试中,它的传输速率仅为平均水平(217 MB/s),但仍比 USB 2.0 快很多。
这款手机还配备了 NFC 和蓝牙 5.3,但遗憾的是,您仍然不能使用 UWB。
软件 - 改进操作的外部显示屏
Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 使用Android 13 和三星用户界面 One UI 5.1.1,在测试时,该界面已安装了从 2023 年 8 月 1 日开始的最新安全补丁。这种情况将持续相当长的一段时间,因为这款可折叠手机将在四年内每月接收这些补丁,之后每季度接收一次,持续一年。此外,Flip5 还将进行四次重大升级,即Android 17。
外部显示屏的软件升级幅度最大:它现在不仅更大了,而且还有一个带有新部件的全电容式触摸屏。遗憾的是,我们无法在这块显示屏上原生运行所有应用程序,但你可以运行谷歌地图和 WhatsApp 等应用程序。在小键盘的帮助下,你实际上可以通过外屏直接回复 Messenger 消息。你只需通过实验室激活这项功能即可。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Z Flip5 具有精确的定位服务
三星Galaxy Z Flip5 支持 Wi-Fi 6E,因此支持三频 WLAN 连接。配合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,这款手机通过 5.0 和 6.0 GHz 实现了高稳定的传输速率。
在使用移动数据时,三星智能手机支持所有常用的移动网络标准,并能访问各种频段。在我们的测试中,该设备在较大的城市也没有出现接收困难的情况,我们完全没有什么可抱怨的。
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
电话功能和通话质量
摄像头 - 出色的双摄像头和便捷的前置取景器
Galaxy Z Flip5 的传统前置摄像头位于内侧,在可折叠显示屏上方。使用该镜头拍摄的照片效果一般,但足以满足视频通话的需要。如果使用手机的主摄像头,自拍效果会更好。外部显示屏可以用作取景器。在日常使用中,这样做效果很好,照片看起来也更好。我们不完全理解为什么在这种情况下视频会被限制在 60 FPS 和全高清,因为据说所有摄像头都支持高达 60 FPS 的超高清。
从技术上看,双摄像头与Galaxy Z Flip4相同,但由于采用了更强大的 IPS,它们显然能拍摄出更好的照片。在日光下,三星手机拍摄的照片色彩鲜艳。它的超广角镜头还不错,但在拍摄边缘时,图像容易变得有点模糊,而且会出现一些图像错误。手机变焦最大为 2 倍,超过 2 倍就无法使用了。数码变焦最大可达 10 倍。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light

交货范围和保修 -Galaxy 智能手机采用超薄包装盒包装
Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 仅配备 SIM 卡工具和 USB-C 数据线。无线和有线电源适配器以及各种保护套可从三星或第三方供应商处购买。
Flip5 在美国的保修期为一年,可通过三星Care+ 延长保修期。保险套餐延长保修期,价格在 129 美元至 329 美元之间。
输入设备和操作 - Flip5 有一个小键盘
Galaxy Z Flip5 的两块触摸屏在我们的测试中都表现得非常可靠,没有出现任何问题。由于外屏的刷新率仅为 60 Hz,因此动画看起来并不像手机内屏那样如丝般顺滑。可在小屏幕上使用的适配键盘实际上效果不错。只是遗憾的是,显示屏无法适应设备的定位。
电源按钮内的指纹传感器负责生物识别安全。虽然建议您在旋转传感器时再用手指触摸扫描仪一次,因为当手机折叠关闭时,它有时会不那么准确。您还可以使用面部识别功能,与Pixel Fold 不同的是,您可以在手机折叠关闭或打开时使用面部识别功能。另一方面,它的安全性稍差。
显示屏 - OLED,亮度高达 1,666 cd/m²
Galaxy Z Flip5 的可折叠显示屏与 Flip4 大小相同。Flip4在显示纯白色并由环境光传感器控制时,亮度仅为最低。在这种情况下,平均亮度为 848 cd/m²,峰值为 1,666 cd/m²(APL18)。如果手动控制亮度,手机亮度可达 415 cd/m²;如果使用额外亮度设置,亮度可达 705 cd/m²。
较小的封面显示屏亮度更高一些(纯白描述、主动式环境光传感器)--画面中央的亮度可达 947 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量中,它的亮度略有下降,仅达到 1,296 cd/m² - 低于三星宣称的显示屏可达到的 1,600 nits。如果没有传感器,亮度可达到 409 cd/m²。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 836 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.70 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Super AMOLED, 720x748, 3.40 | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.90 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.70 | Huawei P50 Pocket Foldable OLED, 2790x1188, 6.90 | Asus Zenfone 10 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.90 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 7% | -53% | 17% | 12% | -16% | |
Brightness middle | 836 | 947 13% | 849 2% | 795 -5% | 780 -7% | 797 -5% |
Brightness | 848 | 915 8% | 830 -2% | 800 -6% | 768 -9% | 789 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 96 -1% | 96 -1% | 97 0% | 96 -1% | 93 -4% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 3.02 -16% | 1 62% | 1.1 58% | 3.64 -40% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 7.61 -69% | 2.5 44% | 3.1 31% | 1.92 57% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 5.3 -231% | 1.5 6% | 1.6 -0% | 3.1 -94% | |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.198 100% | 2.37 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.238 98% | |
CCT | 6319 103% | 6338 103% | 6466 101% | 6483 100% | 6531 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19014 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
具有固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列(可折叠显示屏)
我们使用 Calman 分析了Galaxy Z Flip5 在可折叠屏幕上显示色彩的准确度。使用自然屏幕模式可以获得最佳效果,该模式使用 sRGB 色彩空间,只有在蓝色部分较大时才会明显偏离目标色彩。因此,显示屏的校准效果仍然很好,但准确度略低于 Flip4.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.005 ms rise | |
↘ 0.777 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.716 ms rise | |
↘ 0.703 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.6 ms). |
性能 - Flip5 内的骁龙 8 代Galaxy
使用骁龙 8 代 2GalaxyGalaxy Z Flip5 采用了目前最快的 SoC,由于主频提升较小,它甚至应该比普通机型稍快一些。然而,通常情况并非如此,尤其是在需要大量性能的时候--很可能是由于散热太弱。
不过,三星智能手机在基准测试中取得了不错的成绩,这也反映在流畅的系统性能上。
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1542 - 1598, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 1885, n=238, last 2 years) | |
Multi-Core | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4906 - 5082, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 5538, n=238, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.1 - 6.2 | |
Single-Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1999 - 2079, n=3) | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2104, n=32, last 2 years) | |
Multi-Core | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (5228 - 5534, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 5648, n=32, last 2 years) |
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1086936 - 1226224, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1322448, n=166, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (15270 - 17002, n=6) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 28378, n=229, last 2 years) |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1120 - 1332, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1356, n=156, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra |
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=126, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1267 - 16702, n=6) |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 128240, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1216 - 1320, n=4) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra |
Galaxy Z Flip5 安装的 Adreno 740 是Android 智能手机最快的图形处理器。虽然新 SoC 的性能可能比其前代 前代但在大多数测试中,它的表现都不尽如人意。在这里,其薄弱的散热似乎也是限制因素。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (158.6 - 192.3, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105) | |
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) | |
Average of class Smartphone (17.3 - 282, n=170, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 185, n=6) | |
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (chrome 105) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) | |
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 202, n=114, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (55459 - 62837, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105) | |
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 74261, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 9999, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 780, n=6) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | Huawei P50 Pocket | Asus Zenfone 10 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 21% | -22% | -13% | 69% | 37% | -35% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3412.35 | 1816.8 -47% | 1598.77 -53% | 1839 -46% | 3517.3 3% | 3527 ? 3% | 1228 ? -64% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2289.61 | 1352.6 -41% | 987.09 -57% | 575 -75% | 3041.5 33% | 2429 ? 6% | 815 ? -64% |
Random Read 4KB | 444.6 | 362 -19% | 308.23 -31% | 263.5 -41% | 418.1 -6% | 413 ? -7% | 215 ? -52% |
Random Write 4KB | 161.87 | 472.3 192% | 245.94 52% | 342.1 111% | 559.4 246% | 399 ? 146% | 225 ? 39% |
排放物 - Flip5 会变得非常热
温度
在负载情况下,三星Galaxy Z Flip5 会变得非常热。在温暖的日子里,这尤其会成为一个问题。由于我们现在使用的是要求苛刻的 Burnout 基准测试,而不是稳定性测试,因此无法将这些数值与前代产品进行比较。
三星只对 SoC 进行了部分降温--在连续负载的情况下,我们注意到性能下降了 60% 以上,这意味着 Flip5 的速度几乎比Razr+ ,后者依赖于较旧的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Asus Zenfone 10 | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G |
发言人
SamsungGalaxy Z Flip5 上的两个扬声器可提供不错的音效,但高音在高音量时有些吃力,而且听起来有相当尖锐的倾向。
有线扬声器和耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。蓝牙可用于无线传输,但只支持最常见的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC)。
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
电池寿命:3,700 毫安时,可持续使用 10 小时以上
耗电量
Galaxy Z Flip5 的功耗很低,没有任何值得批评的地方。这款智能手机支持高达 25 瓦的快速充电和无线充电 (Qi)。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 3700 mAh | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 3800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G 3700 mAh | Huawei P50 Pocket 4000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 10 4300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -49% | 7% | -94% | -62% | -93% | -56% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.44 | 0.9 -105% | 0.56 -27% | 1.33 -202% | 0.9 -105% | 1.264 ? -187% | 0.876 ? -99% |
Idle Average * | 0.69 | 1.1 -59% | 0.71 -3% | 1.77 -157% | 1.1 -59% | 1.597 ? -131% | 1.491 ? -116% |
Idle Maximum * | 0.91 | 1.3 -43% | 0.79 13% | 1.89 -108% | 1.5 -65% | 1.726 ? -90% | 1.699 ? -87% |
Load Average * | 6.61 | 5.5 17% | 3.59 46% | 4.25 36% | 7.6 -15% | 7.35 ? -11% | 4.55 ? 31% |
Load Maximum * | 6.72 | 10.3 -53% | 6.45 4% | 9.19 -37% | 11 -64% | 9.96 ? -48% | 7.4 ? -10% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Asus Zenfone 10 |
Pros
Cons
评语 -Galaxy Z Flip5 显示出巨大进步
Galaxy Z Flip5 在 Flip4 上仍饱受诟病,而三星则在此基础上进行了大量改进:现在,它配备了快速 USB 3.2 连接,支持 6 GHz WLAN,折叠在一起时会自动关闭,并支持双频 GNSS。除此之外,这款手机还在外部配备了一块全新的、更大的显示屏,确实为该设备增色不少。
三星Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 在很多方面都有所改进,因此,它被证明是一款非常出色的可折叠智能手机。
但另一方面,三星并没有设法消除手机外壳的多余热量,其蓝牙音频编解码器也没有得到改进。此外,您还将不得不忍受没有 UWB 的情况。令人遗憾的是,三星未能改善设备的重量。
如果您正在考虑购买Galaxy Z Flip5,那么您可以期待获得一款出色的可折叠智能手机--但是,这一切都需要付出代价:它的发布价格与Razr+.Z Flip5 的前身要便宜得多,但它的盖板显示屏也要小得多。它的 OPPO Find N2 Flip也是一个有趣的替代品,但并不是每个国家都能买到。
价格和供应情况
Galaxy Z Flip5 可直接从Samsung 购买。售价为 999.99 美元。
在亚马逊上也能以同样的价格买到。
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
-
08/18/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.