Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarOppo A54 5G智能手机的评论。经济型5G手机中的稳固摄像头
无论是A94 5G ，A73 5G，还是我们目前的评测样品A54 5G，Oppo总是努力在价格、性能和功能之间实现良好的折衷。以大约270欧元（约318美元）的价格，Oppo A54 5G配备了高通骁龙480 5G，其集成的Adreno 619，用于系统
和图形性能。此外，还有4GB的内存和64GB的内部存储。有了这些设备，这款相对便宜的5G智能手机必须面对下面列出的竞争。我们数据库中的其他智能手机也可以添加到每个部分下进行比较。
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 % | 08/2021 | Oppo A54 5G SD 480, Adreno 619 | 190 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80.2 % | 05/2021 | Realme 8 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 185 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 75.7 % | 02/2021 | Samsung Galaxy M12 Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 214 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 80.5 % | 08/2021 | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.2 % | 06/2021 | Motorola Moto G50 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 192 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳 - 轻型5G智能手机
Oppo A54 5G采用窄屏幕边框和塑料外壳。指纹传感器位于侧面，所以背面只有长方形的相机元件可以区分。提供流体黑和梦幻紫作为颜色。
与我们的审查样本相比，A54 5G比Poco M3 Pro 5G ，例如，它的尺寸几乎与realme 8 5G 。它的重量为190克，也是一款相当轻的智能手机。
连接性 - 带有音频插孔的预算5G手机
除了上述硬件，Oppo A54 5G还有一个microSD读卡器，不会阻挡另外两个SIM卡槽的任何一个。后者支持VoLTE和VoWLAN。USB-C端口支持USB2.0标准，还包括一个3.5毫米音频插孔以及DRM Widevine L1。支持Camera2 API Level 3。
微型SD卡读卡器
使用我们的东芝Exceria pro M501参考存储卡，SD读卡器的数据复制速度达到了33.62MB/s。虽然这不是特别快，但它比我们测试领域的其他产品要好。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Oppo A54 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件--基于ColorOS的Android
Oppo A54 5G运行Android 11，安全补丁为2021年5月5日的水平。制造商专有的ColorOS 11.1被用作用户界面，它与纯Android 。然而，定制的应用程序被用于查看照片和文件资源管理器，例如。
此外，设置菜单的结构也被修改。对于Facebook和TikTok，也预装了第三方应用程序，但它们可以很容易地被删除。
通信和GNSS - 带有NFC和Wi-Fi 5
A54 5G可以通过GSM、3G、LTE和5G建立移动连接。支持的频段非常广泛，使用LTE Cat.A54，下载数据可达到800 Mb/s，上传数据可达到225 Mb/s。 15.
对于近距离通信，Oppo的智能手机有NFC、蓝牙5.1和Wi-Fi 5可供选择。后者与我们的参考路由器结合使用时，发送数据的平均速度为276 Mb/s，接收数据的平均速度为312 Mb/s。这个分数在我们的测试领域中排名较低，只被三星Galaxy M12 所削弱。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
A54 5G可以利用GPS、GLONASS、Galileo、BeiDou和QZSS来确定其位置。结合应用程序 "GPS测试"，智能手机可以在户外实现高达4米的定位精度。
在我们例行的自行车骑行中，跟踪的距离与我们的参考设备Garmin Edge 500的误差相似。
电话和通话质量 - 与A54 5G的清晰连接
在Oppo A54 5G上可以用Android"标准电话 "应用程序进行通话。通话时音量相对较高，背景噪音被很好地阻隔。双方都能很好地理解用户的意思。
照相机 - 48MP的良好照片
Oppo A54的前置摄像头可以拍摄分辨率为16MP的肖像。它的颜色看起来很自然，强烈的对比度差异得到很好的平衡。然而，一旦光线不再理想，精细的细节和结构就会变得有点模糊。可以使用色彩过滤器和美化模式来调整所产生的图像。
主摄像头有4800万像素，用于拍摄简单的照片，外加200万像素的深度信息。这允许在近距离拍摄物体的良好照片，并提供许多细节和生动的色彩。全景拍摄对象显示出类似的特征，但如果照明不均匀，往往会在照片中显示出黑暗区域。超广角照片由一个800万像素的传感器拍摄，也能提供丰富的色彩。但只有当它们与周围的物体明显分开时，才能看到细节。
如果你想让图片中的物体更接近，只有数字变焦可用。这绝对是功能性的，它显示了一个坚实的结果，图片中的物体被适度地分开。在光线不足的情况下，只能模糊地识别物体，而且颜色严重失真。专业模式可用于手动调整图像质量，允许用户对ISO、快门速度、白平衡、焦点和亮度设置进行修改。一个200万像素的微距传感器完善了相机的设置。
视频记录的质量与我们的测试图片相似。这里也有彩色过滤器，但没有专业模式。可用的分辨率为720p和1080p，每种情况下都是30帧。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Close-upPanoramaUltra winde-angleZoom (5x)Low-light
ColorChecker Passport图片显示，Oppo A54 5G的摄像头再现的颜色比它们应该的要亮。测试图在受控的照明条件下拍摄得很清晰，但它在下角显示出对比度的弱点。
配件和保修 - 耳机和保护盒包含在盒子里
Oppo A54 5G配备了一个USB电源适配器和相应的USB-C电缆，一个硅胶保护套，一个SIM卡工具，以及一个3.5毫米接口的立体声耳机。
制造商表示保修期为24个月。
输入设备和处理 - 侧面安装的指纹扫描仪
Oppo使用谷歌的GBoard作为键盘应用，允许输入没有问题。触摸屏对点击的反应很可靠，也适合偶尔的拖放手势。
除了良好的面部识别，A54 5G还可以通过侧面安装的指纹传感器进行解锁。在测试中，它对存储的指纹反应很快，很少需要进行第二次尝试。
显示屏 - 明亮且有90赫兹，但对比度低
Oppo A54 5G的屏幕由6.5英寸IPS面板组成，提供2400x1080像素的分辨率。启用亮度传感器后，我们测得的最大亮度平均为504cd/m²。在没有传感器的情况下，仍能达到438 cd/m²。最小亮度为1.38 cd/m²，APL50测试中的最大值为514 cd/m²。
PWM只在低于14%的水平上用于控制亮度，而且频率相对较高，为2404Hz。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 498 cd/m²
Contrast: 778:1 (Black: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Oppo A54 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Realme 8 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Samsung Galaxy M12 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Motorola Moto G50 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -63% | -82% | 35% | -49% | |
| Brightness middle | 498 | 576 16% | 426 -14% | 427 -14% | 340 -32% |
| Brightness | 504 | 550 9% | 428 -15% | 404 -20% | 325 -36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 89 -6% | 87 -8% | 92 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.64 | 0.7 -9% | 0.46 28% | 0.17 73% | 0.18 72% |
| Contrast | 778 | 823 6% | 926 19% | 2512 223% | 1889 143% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3.58 -156% | 4.89 -249% | 1.5 -7% | 4.75 -239% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 6.95 -167% | 9.42 -262% | 2.1 19% | 7.53 -190% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 5.7 -200% | 4.8 -153% | 1.6 16% | 3.9 -105% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.141 103% | 2.27 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.224 99% |
| CCT | 6440 101% | 7922 82% | 7669 85% | 6652 98% | 7384 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2404 Hz | ≤ 14 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17909 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
根据我们的测量，778:1的对比度和0.64cd/m²的黑色水平只足以在我们的测试领域中处于较低的位置。此外，CalMAN分析显示，当选择 "Warmer "显示配置文件时，颜色以最平衡的方式再现--另外，"Standard "和 "Cooler "变体也可供选择。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
只要是在阴凉的地方，Oppo A54 5G在户外也能很好地使用。阳光直射会导致强烈的眩光和反射，这限制了屏幕内容的观看。
Oppo A54 5G的IPS面板具有很好的视角稳定性，即使从平坦的角度也能显示图像内容，不会变得扭曲或显示错误的颜色。
性能 - 适用于日常应用
Oppo A54 5G是一款中低端的预算5G智能手机，它配备了相应的硬件。这里使用的高通骁龙480 5G是一个现代的SoC，为日常应用提供足够的性能。
在基准测试中，系统重度学科的结果通常略高于摩托罗拉Moto G50 ，但后者在图形要求高的测试中表现得更好。总的来说，A54 5G可以在我们的测试领域中处于中间位置。
高性能模式也可以在设置菜单中激活，在这里取得的结果也使用了这种模式。以3DMark Wildlife的978分到981分为例，虽然这只导致了性能的轻微提高。
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (257336 - 264533, n=5) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark GPU 1.2 | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (19 - 25.7, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.65 - 13860, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.3 - 9309, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| 1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (29.8 - 210, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.12 - 39496, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (19.6 - 26.8, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.51 - 15712, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (17.5 - 23.5, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10 - 14706, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Oppo A54 5G在浏览器基准测试中可以领先我们的测试领域。只有在Octane v2中，realme 8，表现稍好。在日常使用中，这意味着网站滚动流畅，媒体内容加载迅速。
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (44.1 - 49.4, n=5) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91) | |
| Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (78.6 - 84.3, n=5) | |
| Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91) | |
| Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Chome 91) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (37.6 - 39.2, n=5) | |
| Realme 8 5G (Chome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chome 90) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (67 - 80, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (15636 - 18774, n=6) | |
| Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101) | |
| Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
| Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91) | |
| Oppo A54 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (2383 - 2749, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Oppo为A54 5G配备了64GB的UFS 2.1存储空间，其接口简单，因此相当缓慢。读取和写入率在我们的测试领域处于中等水平。
| Oppo A54 5G | Realme 8 5G | Samsung Galaxy M12 | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | Motorola Moto G50 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 37% | -25% | 61% | -19% | -2% | 184% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 493.5 | 969 96% | 311.4 -37% | 954 93% | 392 -21% | 696 ? 41% | 1505 ? 205% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 248.1 | 201 -19% | 249.3 0% | 489.1 97% | 204.4 -18% | 224 ? -10% | 1112 ? 348% |
| Random Read 4KB | 136.8 | 192 40% | 120.9 -12% | 155.8 14% | 89.2 -35% | 137.2 ? 0% | 247 ? 81% |
| Random Write 4KB | 134.8 | 175 30% | 67.2 -50% | 186.1 38% | 131.7 -2% | 84.7 ? -37% | 271 ? 101% |
游戏--只有在图形需求较低时才有可能实现高帧率
高通Adreno 619内部图形单元负责显示Oppo A54 5G中的图像内容。即使在较高的设置下，它也能流畅地运行现代游戏。正如我们用Gamebench进行的测试所显示的那样，只有在较低的细节设置和较老的游戏中，帧率才可能明显高于30帧。
排放--Oppo A54 5G会发热，但不烫手
温度
根据我们的测量，Oppo A54 5G的表面发热到39.4℃（约103°F）。这使它感到温暖，但不会太热而无法继续使用。两个野生动物压力基准测试也显示，在长时间的负载下，性能几乎没有波动。
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Realme 8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Moto G50 | |
| Oppo A54 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
A54 5G的扬声器提供了一个相对较高的音量和一个为较高音调而优化的声谱。例如，通过这种方式可以很好地再现语音内容，但建议使用耳机或外部扬声器来消费媒体或听音乐。3.5毫米音频插孔的信噪比值为73.69dBFS，属于中等水平。
Oppo A54 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Realme 8 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 使用Wi-Fi时超过16小时
能源消耗
A54 5G在我们的测试中显示的功耗水平属于我们测试领域的中间水平。这使得它成为一个节俭的设备。
附带的USB电源适配器的输出能力为10瓦。
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.18 Watt |
| Idle |  0.64 / 1.72 / 1.74 Watt |
| Load |
3.95 / 5.01 Watt |
    
| |
| Oppo A54 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M12 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G50 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | -7% | -5% | 0% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 1 -56% | 0.69 -8% | 0.9 -41% | 0.734 ? -15% | 0.897 ? -40% |
| Idle Average * | 1.72 | 1.6 7% | 2.04 -19% | 1.5 13% | 1.552 ? 10% | 1.452 ? 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.74 | 2.3 -32% | 2.07 -19% | 1.9 -9% | 1.778 ? -2% | 1.629 ? 6% |
| Load Average * | 3.95 | 4 -1% | 3.27 17% | 3.5 11% | 3.56 ? 10% | 5.55 ? -41% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.01 | 6 -20% | 5.33 -6% | 4.9 2% | 5.09 ? -2% | 8.31 ? -66% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们的真实世界Wi-Fi测试中，Oppo A54 5G实现了16:27小时的运行时间。这意味着，它没有像我们选择的大多数对比设备那样持续很长时间。只有，三星Galaxy M12，在我们的测试领域显示出更低的结果。
Oppo A54 5G不能快速充电，因此需要大约两个小时才能完全充电。
| Oppo A54 5G 5000 mAh | Realme 8 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M12 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G50 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 987 | 1104 12% | 926 -6% | 1025 4% | 1198 21% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 有竞争力，但没有独特的卖点
Oppo A54 5G是市场上许多经济实惠的智能手机之一。它支持5G的事实不再使它成为一个特殊的设备，这就是为什么其余的功能是决定性的。在这方面，Android ，这款手机采用了原创设计和90赫兹显示屏。后者只提供适度的对比度，但它比同类竞争者更亮。
通过Oppo A54 5G，制造商提供了一款支持5G的廉价智能手机，适合日常使用。
在系统性能方面，它可以稍微从我们的测试领域中脱颖而出，但这被劣质的图形性能所抵消。相机拍摄的照片还不错，系统总体运行平稳。然而，这些功能是由摩托罗拉Moto G50和 小米Poco M3，例如，它们以类似的价格提供，并在此基础上实现更好的电池寿命。realme 8 5G也是一个同样好的竞争者。
因此，是否购买的决定是基于用户对ColorOS和设计的看法，这和以往一样，是一个品味问题。
价格和可用性
在撰写本文时，你可以在亚马逊上找到Oppo A54 5G，价格约为320美元。售价约为320美元。另外，它也可以在newegg上找到。，尽管价格较高，约为495美元。
Oppo A54 5G
-
07/19/2021 v7
Mike Wobker
Pricecompare
