Notebookcheck

小米Poco M3 Pro 5G智能手机评论。5G手机功能强,价格便宜

强有力的新来者。 通过Poco M3 Pro 5G,小米向注重预算的买家提出了一个令人兴奋的提议。这款6.5英寸的智能手机继承了2021年初以150欧元(约178美元)的低廉价格推出的Poco M3的脚步,并提供了令人印象深刻的价值。有了Poco M3 Pro 5G,现在应该会有更多的东西。我们将在这里对其进行测试。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米以其新的预算智能手机设定了相当高的标准。据制造商称,Poco M3 Pro 5G的目的是在这个价格范围内提供无与伦比的性能和娱乐体验。我们的评论将揭示该智能手机是否能达到这一雄心勃勃的要求。在任何情况下,已经很清楚的是,买家将不得不为Poco M3 Pro支付比其他Poco预算设备更多的钱,例如Poco M3 ,。

Poco M3 Pro 5G的基本版本配备4GB内存和64GB存储空间,建议售价为200欧元(约237美元);顶级配置提供6/128GB,建议售价约为230欧元(约273美元)。然而,作为回报,你得到了一个比Poco M3更快的SoC,即MediaTek Dimensity 700 。此外,还有其他新功能,如NFC、5G连接和90赫兹显示屏。但这使Poco M3 Pro 5G在价格和功能方面非常接近小米Redmi Note 10 5G

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Poco M Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Full HD , glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB (exFAT supported), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, IR blaster, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full
Networking
802.11a/ac/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (band 1,2,4,5,8), 4G (band 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,17,20,28,32,38,40,41,66), 5G (n1,n3,n7,n8,n20,n28,n38,n40,n41,n66,n77,n78), head SAR 0.54 W/kg, body SAR 0.895 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.92 x 161.81 x 75.34
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18-watt fast charge
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix main camera (1/2" sensor size, f/1.79); 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4); 2 MP depth sensor (f/2.4), video recording up to [email protected], slow motion [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: single speaker, Keyboard: virtual, USB Type-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, quick-start guide, warranty card, MIUI 12.0, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
190 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79 %
05/2021
Oppo A74
SD 662, Adreno 610
175 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80 %
05/2021
realme 8 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
185 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
78 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Poco M3
SD 662, Adreno 610
198 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080
80 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080

外壳 - 双色设计的光面后盖

谈到经济型智能手机,你不应该期望有时尚的外壳设计,优雅的玻璃和金属表面,或者IP认证。这是我们在对Poco M3 的评论中所说的,它几乎完全适用于Poco M3 Pro。

对于小米最新的经济型智能手机,你也不得不选择塑料外壳。不过,由于采用了双色设计,符合人体工程学的弧形后盖比Poco M3的橡胶塑料后盖好看多了。小米Redmi Note 10 5G ,也是将塑料盖与彩色的外观相结合,在外观和感觉上非常相似。这一切的弊端。光滑的后盖几乎神奇地吸引了指纹。

背面突出的Poco标志引起了人们的注意。它位于相机单元旁边,在Poco M3 Pro 5G中由三镜头设置组成(48MP + 2MP微距相机 + 2MP深度传感器)。指纹传感器被整合到右侧的电源按钮中。SIM/MicroSD插槽在外壳的左侧找到。

小米提供三种颜色的Poco M3 Pro 5G:"动力黑",就像我们的评测样品,或者是 "酷蓝 "或 "Poco黄"。

Size comparison

164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g162.3 mm 77.3 mm 9.6 mm 198 g162.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.5 mm 185 g161.81 mm 75.34 mm 8.92 mm 190 g161.81 mm 75.34 mm 8.92 mm 190 g160.3 mm 73.8 mm 7.95 mm 175 g

连接性 - 高达6GB的内存和128GB的存储空间

Poco M3 Pro 5G有两个存储版本。基本型号配备4GB LPDDR4X内存和64GB UFS 2.2存储,在小米商店的价格为200欧元(约237美元)。如果你选择6GB内存和128GB存储的顶级配置,它将花费你230欧元(约273美元)。

配置中还包括一个3.5毫米的耳机插孔,当你使用耳机线时,它还可以作为FM收音机的接收器。USB-C插槽以USB 2.0速度运行,并兼容USB-OTG。

此外,机身上还有一个红外辐射器,一个单声道扬声器,以及像小米Redmi Note 10 5G ,一个混合SIM卡插槽,可以容纳两张SIM卡或一张SIM卡和一张microSD卡。后者的容量可以达到512GB,也可以使用exFAT文件系统进行格式化。

左边:SIM/MicroSD插槽
左边:SIM/MicroSD插槽
右边。音量摇杆,带指纹识别器的电源按钮
右边。音量摇杆,带指纹识别器的电源按钮
顶部:红外辐射器,3.5毫米音频插孔
顶部:红外辐射器,3.5毫米音频插孔
底部。麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部。麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

使用我们的东芝Exceria Pro M501参考卡,microSD插槽在跨平台磁盘测试中实现了良好的连续读取和写入速度。相比之下,复制数据的13.7MB/s的速度非常慢。

SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.62 MB/s ∼100% +168%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.66 MB/s ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.4 MB/s ∼37% -2%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859046.242.24444.839.945.644.437.738.433.230.736.135.234.329.133.636.735.73935.735.135.733.935.234.835.836.735.535.736.137.23635.834.236.236.634.636.535.636.435.53838.134.137.935.634.73636.53636.535.634.630.335.437.236.83738.836.333.435.237.332.134.236.733.135.64034.535.936.135.831.740.536.53438.935.131.837.535.740.830.338.140.936.636.837.136.238.237.139.535.838.237.633.63333.933.331.13437.332.935.536.735.837.236.537.333.433.533.533.138.738.940.741373937.13637.531.832.534.137.135.446.242.24444.839.945.644.437.738.433.230.736.135.234.329.133.636.735.73935.735.135.733.935.234.835.836.735.535.736.137.23635.834.236.236.634.636.535.636.435.53838.134.137.935.634.73636.53636.535.634.630.335.437.236.83738.836.333.435.237.332.134.236.733.135.64034.535.936.135.831.740.536.53438.935.131.837.535.740.830.338.140.936.636.837.136.238.237.139.535.838.237.633.63333.933.331.13437.332.935.536.735.837.236.537.333.433.533.533.138.738.940.741373937.13637.531.832.534.137.135.47284.584.886.281.181.685.78486.985.584.985.285.18584.58685.485.18384.684.9858684.685.685.585.585.28484.985.185.284.285.186.184.983.185.885.485.484.78683.986.18685.3838685.386.185.784.385.484.885.784.28683.386.784.483.786.484.582.189.484.784.985.385.683.884.679.385.285.284.284.884.785.584.684.186.380.391.684.286.584.486.284.784.786.68585.684.18784.785.885.484.785.785.58583.985.684.88585.38484.186.585.184.285.284.68584.984.184858783.98685.583.98684.285.854.891Tooltip
; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø36.3 (29.1-46.2)
; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.7 (54.8-91.6)

软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12用于Poco M3 Pro 5G

Poco M3 Pro 5G运行Android 11,上面是小米的MIUI 12用户界面。在测试时,Android 安全补丁仍处于4月1日的水平,因此还没有达到最新水平。然而,由于小米大约每三个月为其目前的智能手机型号提供补丁,你可以期待7月份的更新。

Poco M3 Pro 5G支持DRM Widevine L1,使得它也能以高清质量流传Netflix内容,例如。与此相应,Netflix是预装在智能手机上的少数第三方应用程序之一。其他包括Booking.com、Facebook和eBay等,它们都可以被卸载。如果你不删除任何东西,128GB版本的可用存储空间约为108GB。

通信和GNSS - 低辐射水平和GPS问题

Poco M3 Pro 5G支持两个SIM卡插槽的5G连接,并实现了良好的5G频率覆盖,频段为n1、n3、n7、n8、n20、n28、n38、n40、n41、n66、n77、n78。欧盟地区的4G也不应该有任何连接问题(1、2、3、4、5、7、8、12、17、20、28、32、38、40、41和66频段)。0.54 W/kg(头部SAR)和0.895 W/kg(身体SAR)的低辐射值是另一个加分项。

就像小米Redmi Note 10 5G ,你也可以用Poco M3 Pro 5G的NFC进行移动支付。此外,还可以使用稍新的蓝牙5.1版本(Redmi Note 10 5G为5.0)。然而,这两款智能手机在Wi-Fi速度方面几乎没有差别,因为它们只使用没有MIMO天线技术的Wi-Fi 5。Wi-Fi数据传输相应较低,但在我们的测试中,它们仍然非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=302, last 2 years)
438 MBit/s ∼100% +50%
realme 8 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (332min - 353max) MBit/s ∼79% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼79% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
294 (286min - 301max) MBit/s ∼67% +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
292 (236min - 352max) MBit/s ∼67%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
284 (186min - 366max) MBit/s ∼65% -3%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249 (155min - 290max) MBit/s ∼57% -15%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=302, last 2 years)
436 MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼84% +4%
realme 8 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
362 (335min - 367max) MBit/s ∼83% +3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
353 (177min - 358max) MBit/s ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
350 (332min - 359max) MBit/s ∼80% -1%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
301 (209min - 341max) MBit/s ∼69% -15%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (170min - 314max) MBit/s ∼63% -22%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340177357355351353358348351356356355354353357358354345349349356351352350353354349350348350356177357355351353358348351356356355354353357358354345349349356351352350353354349350348350356294274293288292293286297289297289291293291292299297293236352296303297294277294294298289274Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (177-358)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø292 (236-352)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

Poco M3 Pro 5G使用GPS、伽利略、GLONASS和北斗确定其位置。在测试中,这在室外只需要几秒钟,准确度可达2米。在室内的定位也同样精确,但需要更长的时间。

然而,在短暂的骑车过程中,智能手机在其积极的能源管理中挣扎,它反复以突然的方式停止正在后台运行的应用程序,如GPS工具。因此,记录的路线也相应地变得混乱和不连贯。这是小米手机的一个明显减分点。

GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试。转折点

电话和通话质量

Poco M3 Pro 5G有一个混合SIM卡插槽,这意味着它可以容纳两张SIM卡或一张SIM卡加一张microSD卡。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。

握在耳边时,语音传输的清晰度很高。在免提模式下也没有问题,只要你不离开扬声器太远。Poco M3 Pro 5G还能很好地处理降噪。

摄像机--无超广角镜头的三摄设置

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

自拍相机的分辨率为800万像素,它的软件配备了各种过滤器和美化功能。与普通照片模式相比,人像模式会自动模糊背景。自拍相机记录的视频最高为1080p,每秒30帧。它为视频通话提供了坚实的图像质量。在环境光线不足的情况下,图片很快就会出现噪音。

至少根据规格,三摄像头设置使用了与Poco M3 小米Redmi Note 10 5G 相同的三镜头:一个4800万像素的主摄像头,使用4比1的像素分级拍摄1200万像素的照片;这是由一个200万像素的微距摄像头和一个200万像素的深度传感器加入。从营销的角度来看,"三摄像头 "的说法可能是有效的,但实际上你并没有得到三个摄像头--深度传感器只是用来实现模糊,而微距摄像头相对来说是无用的,因为数字变焦通常会产生更好的效果。

尽管如此,主摄像头的质量还是令人印象深刻。在良好的照明条件下,它能产生体面的照片,这些照片的细节水平高,动态范围大,可以得分,但有时看起来还是有点苍白。在环境光线不足的情况下,照片还是可以的,但尽管有夜间模式,传感器在一定程度上还是无法捕捉到足够的细节,这使得照片看起来很模糊。主摄像头拍摄的视频质量可以接受,但只能以30FPS的全高清拍摄。

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight - Scene 1Daylight - Scene 25x zoomLow-light photo

在实验室条件和模拟日光下(上层色彩图),Poco M3 Pro 5G相当接近参考色彩,并鲜明地再现了测试图。然而,在1勒克斯的亮度下(下层色彩图),色彩偏差非常大,结果只能提供测试图的黑暗和冲淡的图像。

ColorChecker
6.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G: 4.81 ∆E min: 2.05 - max: 10.04 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50.4 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
34 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
71.5 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
73.2 ∆E
67.8 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G: 43.78 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 73.22 ∆E

配件和保修 - 盒子里包括22.5瓦的电源适配器

Poco M3 Pro 5G的包装包括一个22.5瓦的电源适配器,以及一条合适的USB线(Type-C转Type-A),一个SIM卡工具,一个透明保护套,一份快速启动指南,以及保修信息。

小米为该智能手机提供12个月的保修。当然,零售商的保修也是有效的。我们的常见问题文章,提供这方面的信息。

输入设备和操作--得益于联发科SoC的响应速度

联发科Dimensity 700中端SoC将Poco M3 Pro 5G变成了一款反应迅速的智能手机,对输入的反应很快。集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器和非常可靠的2D人脸识别也是如此。

小米使用谷歌的GBoard作为标准键盘,但如果需要,可以用Play Store中的任何其他键盘代替。

横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 90赫兹面板,低亮度

子像素网格
子像素网格

Poco M3 Pro 5G在其6.5英寸IPS面板上显示其2400x1080像素的全高清+分辨率,提供410PPI的高像素密度。

刷新率从60赫兹切换到90赫兹,这确保了图像的流畅性。如果内容不能以90赫兹呈现,智能手机会自动切换到60赫兹,从而节省电池电量。今后,固件更新也应该能够在90、60和30赫兹之间平稳过渡。

名义上,IPS面板的最大亮度为500cd/m²,但它仍然明显低于这一标准,平均亮度为403.8cd/m²,而且它也是迄今为止我们比较领域中亮度最低的设备。名义上相同的小米Redmi Note 10 5G的显示屏要亮得多。我们可以从显示屏上获得最高430cd/m²的亮度(APL50测量)。当亮度传感器被禁用时,最高可以达到426cd/m²。我们在最低亮度水平下测量到1.25 cd/m²。

IPS面板不使用PWM进行亮度控制,所以即使是敏感的用户也可以毫无顾虑地使用Poco M3 Pro 5G。

415
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 427 cd/m² Average: 403.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 427 cd/m²
Contrast: 2512:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
93.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Oppo A74
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
realme 8 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco M3
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
-56%
-116%
-140%
-19%
-24%
Brightness middle
427
606
42%
576
35%
543
27%
465
9%
550
29%
Brightness
404
606
50%
550
36%
512
27%
428
6%
515
27%
Brightness Distribution
87
98
13%
91
5%
85
-2%
89
2%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.17
0.7
-312%
0.63
-271%
0.21
-24%
0.32
-88%
Contrast
2512
823
-67%
862
-66%
2214
-12%
1719
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.5
3.6
-140%
3.58
-139%
4.9
-227%
1.7
-13%
1.8
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
6.2
-195%
6.95
-231%
8.6
-310%
3.5
-67%
3.1
-48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
3.3
-106%
5.7
-256%
6.3
-294%
2.4
-50%
2.5
-56%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.31 95%
2.141 103%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.28 96%
CCT
6652 98%
6704 97%
7922 82%
8120 80%
6664 98%
6326 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15324 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

我们从小米手机的 "标准 "色彩方案中得到了最好的图像质量(其他选项是预设的 "自动 "方案,以及 "饱和 "方案)。在这种情况下,它实现了2,512:1的对比度,按照IPS标准,这是非常好的(然而,在APL50测量中,由于较高的黑色水平,它略低),并为用户提供了丰富的黑色,以及准确再现的颜色和灰阶。

色彩准确性(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩准确性(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩空间(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩空间(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间
灰度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间
灰度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩饱和度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩饱和度(标准色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Poco M3 Pro 5G在户外表现良好,但由于其亮度相当低,最好在阴凉处使用。

Poco M3 Pro 5G的视角稳定性不是特别高,至少在涉及到亮度时是这样--我们在Poco M3上已经注意到这种效果。一旦你停止直视屏幕,内容就会明显变暗。相比之下,即使在非常平坦的视角下,色彩再现仍然是中性的。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 利用联发科Dimensity 700的快速日常性能

Poco M3 Pro 5G搭载了联发科Dimensity 700 ,这是一款中端八核SoC,也出现在小米Redmi Note 10 5G 。与Poco M3及其迟缓的Snapdragon 662 相比,这是一个很大的进步,而且这不仅在基准测试方面很明显。Poco M3 Pro 5G的运行也更加流畅,处理日常任务没有明显的滞后。

然而,我们在其他方面的速度慢了下来,因为安兔兔v8/v9和3DMark都不能在Poco M3 Pro 5G上运行,因为小米在其固件中阻止了这些。不过,利用一些技巧,我们至少能够运行一些3DMark测试。

realme 8 5G ,也配备了联发科Dimensity 700,在Geekbench和系统基准测试中比Poco M3 Pro 5G表现更好,这可能是由于不同的UI和较大的内存(8GB)。三星Galaxy A32 5G联发科Dimensity 720 ,速度也快一些。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
454 Points ∼78%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
305 Points ∼53% -33%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
574 Points ∼99% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼82% +4%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
316 Points ∼55% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
547 Points ∼94% +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (454 - 574, n=5)
541 Points ∼93% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=247, last 2 years)
579 Points ∼100% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1347 Points ∼68%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1234 Points ∼62% -8%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1775 Points ∼89% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼76% +12%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1275 Points ∼64% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1692 Points ∼85% +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1347 - 1775, n=5)
1660 Points ∼84% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=247, last 2 years)
1984 Points ∼100% +47%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1397 Points ∼64%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1418 Points ∼65% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1375 Points ∼63% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1375 - 1474, n=4)
1406 Points ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=142, last 2 years)
2182 Points ∼100% +56%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1346 Points ∼60%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points ∼17% -72%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1507 Points ∼67% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1525 Points ∼68% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1402 Points ∼62% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1346 - 1507, n=5)
1428 Points ∼63% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=145, last 2 years)
2253 Points ∼100% +67%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9100 Points ∼87%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7554 Points ∼72% -17%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10433 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8965 Points ∼86% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6783 - 10433, n=5)
8543 Points ∼82% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=61, last 2 years)
9924 Points ∼95% +9%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8311 Points ∼76%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7184 Points ∼65% -14%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10981 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points ∼56% -26%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6042 Points ∼55% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8504 Points ∼77% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6368 - 10981, n=4)
8541 Points ∼78% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=259, last 2 years)
7935 Points ∼72% -5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3149 Points ∼90%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1797 Points ∼51% -43%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3340 Points ∼95% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3499 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1797 Points ∼51% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3396 Points ∼97% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3149 - 3449, n=5)
3338 Points ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)
3456 Points ∼99% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3319 Points ∼82%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1681 Points ∼41% -49%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3463 Points ∼85% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3805 Points ∼94% +15%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1715 Points ∼42% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3501 Points ∼86% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3319 - 3501, n=5)
3430 Points ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)
4051 Points ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2669 Points ∼87%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2368 Points ∼77% -11%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2971 Points ∼97% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2730 Points ∼89% +2%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2161 Points ∼70% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3073 Points ∼100% +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2669 - 3535, n=5)
3068 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)
2795 Points ∼91% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3277 Points ∼79%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1819 Points ∼44% -44%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3544 Points ∼85% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼89% +13%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1861 Points ∼45% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3553 Points ∼86% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3277 - 3565, n=5)
3491 Points ∼84% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
4153 Points ∼100% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3435 Points ∼65%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1737 Points ∼33% -49%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3637 Points ∼69% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼76% +16%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1779 Points ∼34% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3664 Points ∼70% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3435 - 3664, n=5)
3593 Points ∼68% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5258 Points ∼100% +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2824 Points ∼87%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2182 Points ∼67% -23%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3251 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼93% +7%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2221 Points ∼68% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3214 Points ∼99% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2824 - 3389, n=5)
3179 Points ∼98% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2991 Points ∼92% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2411 Points ∼91%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1151 Points ∼43% -52%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2343 Points ∼88% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼97% +7%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1173 Points ∼44% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2453 Points ∼92% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2343 - 2453, n=5)
2397 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)
2653 Points ∼100% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2313 Points ∼82%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
998 Points ∼36% -57%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2206 Points ∼79% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼90% +9%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼36% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2302 Points ∼82% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2206 - 2313, n=5)
2252 Points ∼80% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)
2806 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2829 Points ∼89%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2474 Points ∼78% -13%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2991 Points ∼94% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼87% -2%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼76% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3184 Points ∼100% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2829 - 3508, n=5)
3112 Points ∼98% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)
2827 Points ∼89% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2449 Points ∼73%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1152 Points ∼34% -53%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2453 Points ∼73% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼79% +9%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1176 Points ∼35% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2497 Points ∼74% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2449 - 2497, n=5)
2468 Points ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3371 Points ∼100% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2336 Points ∼61%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1015 Points ∼27% -57%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2295 Points ∼60% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼68% +11%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1032 Points ∼27% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2327 Points ∼61% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2290 - 2336, n=5)
2311 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3806 Points ∼100% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2948 Points ∼88%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2177 Points ∼65% -26%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3234 Points ∼96% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2298 Points ∼68% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3355 Points ∼100% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2948 - 3355, n=5)
3242 Points ∼97% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3036 Points ∼90% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2188 Points ∼83%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1113 Points ∼42% -49%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2224 Points ∼85% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2501 Points ∼95% +14%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1096 Points ∼42% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2219 Points ∼85% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2188 - 2280, n=5)
2231 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=214, last 2 years)
2623 Points ∼100% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2136 Points ∼73%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
968 Points ∼33% -55%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2138 Points ∼73% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2461 Points ∼84% +15%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
963 Points ∼33% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2133 Points ∼73% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2133 - 2141, n=5)
2138 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=214, last 2 years)
2938 Points ∼100% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2391 Points ∼90%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2349 Points ∼89% -2%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2586 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2651 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2124 Points ∼80% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2582 Points ∼97% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2391 - 2956, n=5)
2643 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=214, last 2 years)
2648 Points ∼100% +11%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points ∼14%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1103 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1094 - 1103, n=3)
1100 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=106, last 2 years)
2825 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1078 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1074 - 1083, n=3)
1078 Points ∼37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 8672, n=102, last 2 years)
2934 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points ∼12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (316 - 321, n=2)
319 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=53, last 2 years)
889 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (312 - 1073, n=2)
693 Points ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=51, last 2 years)
893 Points ∼100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
51 fps ∼85%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼58% -31%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
57 fps ∼95% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
32 fps ∼53% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
53 fps ∼88% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (51 - 57, n=4)
53.3 fps ∼89% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
59.3 fps ∼99% +16%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
55 fps ∼51%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼32% -36%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
63 fps ∼58% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
68 fps ∼63% +24%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼32% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
59 fps ∼55% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (55 - 63, n=4)
59.5 fps ∼55% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 319, n=218, last 2 years)
108 fps ∼100% +96%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
32 fps ∼59%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼35% -41%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
35 fps ∼65% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
54 fps ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼31% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
33 fps ∼61% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (32 - 35, n=4)
33.3 fps ∼62% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
46.7 fps ∼86% +46%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
34 fps ∼54%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼30% -44%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
38 fps ∼60% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
41 fps ∼65% +21%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼30% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼59% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (34 - 38, n=4)
36.5 fps ∼58% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
63 fps ∼100% +85%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
21 fps ∼41%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼25% -38%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22 fps ∼43% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
51 fps ∼100% +143%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼24% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼45% +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (21 - 23, n=4)
21.8 fps ∼43% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
36.5 fps ∼72% +74%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
22 fps ∼51%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼30% -41%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
25 fps ∼58% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
26 fps ∼60% +18%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼30% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼55% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (22 - 25, n=4)
23.8 fps ∼55% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
43.3 fps ∼100% +97%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12 fps ∼52%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7 fps ∼30% -42%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps ∼57% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6.4 fps ∼28% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼48% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (11 - 13, n=4)
11.8 fps ∼51% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 61, n=213, last 2 years)
22.6 fps ∼98% +88%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼50%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps ∼27% -45%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼58% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼27% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (10 - 15, n=4)
13 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
26 fps ∼100% +100%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼47%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps ∼28% -41%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
14 fps ∼47% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.5 fps ∼25% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼47% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (13 - 14, n=5)
13.6 fps ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=283, last 2 years)
23 fps ∼77% +64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼53%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.2 fps ∼31% -41%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼57% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼64% +21%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼31% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼57% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (14 - 15, n=5)
14.8 fps ∼56% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=282, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼100% +89%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.8 fps ∼52%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.9 fps ∼29% -44%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.7 fps ∼51% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼100% +93%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼26% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps ∼52% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (8.1 - 8.9, n=5)
8.58 fps ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=283, last 2 years)
15.1 fps ∼89% +72%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.5 fps ∼53%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼27% -49%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps ∼54% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼60% +13%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼27% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼53% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5.5 - 5.6, n=5)
5.54 fps ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=283, last 2 years)
10.4 fps ∼100% +89%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
198053 Points ∼41%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
356312 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (287506 - 356312, n=2)
321909 Points ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=48, last 2 years)
482716 Points ∼100%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
185542 Points ∼55%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
261067 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
252308 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
183808 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
260248 Points ∼77%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (249843 - 261067, n=3)
257053 Points ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=194, last 2 years)
336734 Points ∼100%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12011 Points ∼19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15832 Points ∼24% +32%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5225 Points ∼8% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12331 Points ∼19% +3%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4660 Points ∼7% -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11953 Points ∼18% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5225 - 12011, n=4)
9496 Points ∼15% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=74, last 2 years)
64854 Points ∼100% +440%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3107 Points ∼84%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2247 Points ∼61% -28%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3011 Points ∼81% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2735 Points ∼74% -12%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼65% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points ∼82% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3005 - 3107, n=4)
3043 Points ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 7123, n=203, last 2 years)
3710 Points ∼100% +19%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6148 Points ∼91%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4921 Points ∼73% -20%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6712 Points ∼99% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4995 Points ∼74% -19%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4834 Points ∼71% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5760 Points ∼85% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5760 - 6712, n=4)
6277 Points ∼93% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=203, last 2 years)
6771 Points ∼100% +10%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4264 Points ∼96%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2618 Points ∼59% -39%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
4428 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3281 Points ∼74% -23%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
3454 Points ∼78% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4212 Points ∼95% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4212 - 4473, n=4)
4344 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=203, last 2 years)
4378 Points ∼99% +3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2626 Points ∼46%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1832 Points ∼32% -30%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2401 Points ∼42% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2687 Points ∼47% +2%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1847 Points ∼32% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2675 Points ∼46% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2398 - 2675, n=4)
2525 Points ∼44% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15628, n=203, last 2 years)
5757 Points ∼100% +119%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1353 Points ∼100%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points ∼80% -20%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1152 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1271 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1098 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1328 Points ∼98% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1152 - 1353, n=4)
1251 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=203, last 2 years)
1279 Points ∼95% -5%

在浏览器基准测试中,SoC的层次结构几乎与合成测试相同。Poco M3 Pro 5G与小米Redmi Note 10 5G Poco M3Oppo A74 中领先于Snapdragon 662,但它在这里也能够超过三星Galaxy A32 5Grealme 8 5G仍处于首位。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
49.6 Points ∼100% +38%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
40.447 Points ∼82% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 40.4, n=4)
37.9 Points ∼76% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
36.979 Points ∼75% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
36.302 Points ∼73% +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
35.973 Points ∼73%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
32.187 Points ∼65% -11%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
32.041 Points ∼65% -11%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=197, last 2 years)
89.5 Points ∼100% +29%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
77.921 Points ∼87% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (69.5 - 78.4, n=4)
74.4 Points ∼83% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
71.721 Points ∼80% +3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
69.546 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
67.301 Points ∼75% -3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
49.459 Points ∼55% -29%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
47.837 Points ∼53% -31%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=170, last 2 years)
49 runs/min ∼100% +36%
realme 8 5G (Chome 90)
38.3 runs/min ∼78% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 38.3, n=4)
37.1 runs/min ∼76% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
36.8 runs/min ∼75% +2%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
36 runs/min ∼73%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
29.2 runs/min ∼60% -19%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
26.5 runs/min ∼54% -26%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=205, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
59 Points ∼76% +9%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
54 Points ∼69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 58, n=3)
54 Points ∼69% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
53 Points ∼68% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
51 Points ∼65% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
50 Points ∼64% -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=212, last 2 years)
17665 Points ∼100% +11%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
17380 Points ∼98% +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15459 - 17380, n=4)
16421 Points ∼93% +3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
15976 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
15459 Points ∼88% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
14156 Points ∼80% -11%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
9125 Points ∼52% -43%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
8958 Points ∼51% -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
4536.9 ms * ∼100% -34%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
4321.8 ms * ∼95% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=214, last 2 years)
3913 ms * ∼86% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
3466.7 ms * ∼76% -2%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
3387.3 ms * ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
3327.7 ms * ∼73% +2%
realme 8 5G (Chrome 90)
3145.4 ms * ∼69% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2543 - 3387, n=4)
3101 ms * ∼68% +8%

* ... smaller is better

由于其快速的UFS 2.2存储,Poco M3 Pro 5G以高于平均水平的数据传输率在其价格范围内获得了得分。

Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5GOppo A74realme 8 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5GXiaomi Poco M3Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-34%
-10%
-8%
-29%
-9%
-16%
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB
953.73
514.5
-46%
969
2%
858.19
-10%
509.23
-47%
939.22
-2%
704 (482 - 989, n=11)
-26%
783 (41.9 - 2037, n=291, last 2 years)
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
489.13
255.34
-48%
201
-59%
381.69
-22%
269.2
-45%
398.05
-19%
384 (241 - 710, n=11)
-21%
348 (11.9 - 1321, n=291, last 2 years)
-29%
Random Read 4KB
155.75
139.45
-10%
192
23%
174.64
12%
147.03
-6%
151.55
-3%
151 (105 - 208, n=11)
-3%
140 (13.5 - 325, n=291, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
186.06
126.39
-32%
175
-6%
167.15
-10%
154.1
-17%
162.76
-13%
158 (121 - 207, n=11)
-15%
126 (5.2 - 330, n=291, last 2 years)
-32%

游戏--大部分情况下运行顺畅

只要你不过度增加图形细节,Poco M3 Pro 5G在大多数情况下都能顺利运行游戏。然而,这在《PUBG Mobile》中是不可能的,因为高清设置是极限。但这也导致了几乎恒定的每秒30帧,就像在我们的第二个测试游戏《Armajet》中。在这里,90赫兹的显示屏并没有给Poco M3 Pro 5G带来任何优势。

我们用Gamebench工具确定游戏帧率。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
05101520253030293030303030303029303030303030293030312930303030303030302930303129303030303030303030303030293030303030303030303030303029303030303030302931303030293030303030303029303030303030303030303030303030303029303030303029313029303030303030303030303030293031302930303030303030302930313029303030303030303029312930303030303029313030293030293030303030303029303030303030293030312930303030303030302930303129303030303030303030303030293030303030303030303030303029303030303030302931303030293030303030303029303030303030303030303030303030303029303030303029313029303030303030303030303030293031302930303030303030302930313029303030303030303029312930303030303029313030293030303031302930303129303030303030303030303030303030293130293130302931303029302931292930293129303031293031303030303029303031293030303030303029312930303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030293031302930303029312930303030303030303029303130293130302930312831303030303030303030303130293030303030303128313030303030Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.59.8: Ø29.9 (29-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.4.0: Ø30 (28-31)

排放 - 无节流,固体单声道扬声器

温度

我们测量了Poco M3 Pro 5G在持续负载下的最大表面温度为38.1℃(约101°F)。因此,即使在极端情况下,这款智能手机也不会比温热的温度高,而且始终保持舒适的触感。

正如GFXBench的电池测试显示,内部温度的发展反映了与表面相同的行为。即使在运行T-Rex和曼哈顿测试场景各30次后,帧率仍然和开始时一样高。如果有散热问题,你会立即注意到由于SoC性能的节流而导致的FPS率下降的问题。

GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
Max. Load
 37.3 °C36.4 °C38.1 °C 
 36.3 °C36.4 °C37.6 °C 
 35.5 °C34.9 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 38.1 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
33.3 °C35.4 °C35.8 °C
32.6 °C35.6 °C35.9 °C
31.9 °C34.3 °C34.9 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

Poco M3 Pro 5G的单声道扬声器提供了令人满意的音频质量。由于其平衡的声谱,它可以很好地传输语音,但在视频和音乐播放时,由于缺乏低音,导致声音相当单薄。

通过蓝牙5.1或使用3.5毫米音频插孔,将耳机或外部扬声器连接到Poco M3 Pro 5G,可以获得更好的音效。后者提供良好的质量,信噪比为87.12 dBFS。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203046.32526.742.63125.645.84026.141.85036.443.86329.246.3802547.210017.852.812518.351.316018.655.920017.455.425014.255.931515.958.440012.861500146763013.368.380012.276.1100012.378.4125011.981.7160012.883.2200012.784.4250012.184.8315012.983.4400013.280.3500013.479.9630013.678.3800013.478.81000013.981.1125001484.21600014.271.9SPL25.293.5N0.795.9median 13.4median 78.3Delta1.21135.944.92942.825.144.231.445.142.446.132.448.52647.821.547.41549.121.350.914.453.81457.513.559.511.964.312.265.512.666.513.471.712.275.712.37812.779.913.580.9138312.885.113.782.313.583.613.881.714.783.313.680.214.2731571.125.793.20.795median 13.5median 73110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 耐用,但不是电池神童

能源消耗

Poco M3 Pro 5G在空闲状态下平均消耗2瓦,在负载状态下平均消耗不到3.3瓦,运行起来相当节能,而且它也是相比之下最节俭的智能手机之一。

使用附带的22.5瓦电源适配器,电池可以在125分钟内充满。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 2.04 / 2.07 Watt
Load midlight 3.27 / 5.33 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
-41%
3%
-4%
-1%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.62
10%
0.64
7%
0.5
28%
0.71
-3%
0.767 (0.69 - 0.9, n=3)
-11%
0.953 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-38%
Idle Average *
2.04
1.59
22%
1.95
4%
1.84
10%
2.08
-2%
1.807 (1.3 - 2.08, n=3)
11%
1.812 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Maximum *
2.07
1.63
21%
1.98
4%
1.87
10%
2.13
-3%
1.967 (1.7 - 2.13, n=3)
5%
2.06 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-0%
Load Average *
3.27
4.05
-24%
6.77
-107%
3.99
-22%
3.44
-5%
3.5 (3.27 - 3.8, n=3)
-7%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-36%
Load Maximum *
5.33
5.2
2%
11.42
-114%
6.01
-13%
5.58
-5%
5.57 (5.33 - 5.8, n=3)
-5%
7.28 (3.68 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench, GFXBench, and idle usage (150 cd/m²)

0123451.7241.5351.3761.2751.3341.451.4011.2521.3461.2391.6871.3481.2631.4781.2861.3781.2561.3141.2881.5211.3371.2271.2471.4771.2941.2751.4981.4491.3971.4381.2161.3771.251.2351.5171.5131.2411.2371.5651.3791.3341.2531.2431.591.4891.361.2421.4161.4781.2311.2311.2711.3891.2471.2381.2461.3911.3071.2581.2811.3762.121.3491.7591.6451.5551.6971.5861.3731.2541.2111.2631.3861.2851.4051.2272.031.2871.241.2521.2591.2991.2911.2671.2611.2841.4031.2611.2691.2761.4871.2731.2661.3291.3121.2751.2551.3681.2931.2641.2611.3661.2751.2981.2621.3011.2711.2551.2591.3371.3641.3061.331.271.3761.2751.2821.2371.3671.3211.3111.2591.3361.5561.51.2961.3061.3261.2641.2531.2921.3571.2971.2731.2691.3661.2671.2651.7241.5351.3761.2751.3341.451.4011.2521.3461.2391.6871.3481.2631.4781.2861.3781.2561.3141.2881.5211.3371.2271.2471.4771.2941.2751.4981.4491.3971.4381.2161.3771.251.2351.5171.5131.2411.2371.5651.3791.3341.2531.2431.591.4891.361.2421.4161.4781.2311.2311.2711.3891.2471.2381.2461.3911.3071.2581.2811.3762.121.3491.7591.6451.5551.6971.5861.3731.2541.2111.2631.3861.2851.4051.2272.031.2871.241.2521.2591.2991.2911.2671.2611.2841.4031.2611.2691.2761.4871.2731.2661.3291.3121.2751.2551.3681.2931.2641.2611.3661.2751.2981.2621.3011.2711.2551.2591.3371.3641.3061.331.271.3761.2751.2821.2371.3671.3211.3111.2591.3361.5561.51.2961.3061.3261.2641.2531.2921.3571.2971.2731.2691.3661.2671.2653.252.782.392.462.892.782.842.422.632.512.452.542.482.471.9141.8551.6971.6441.9261.8672.883.013.022.852.892.852.972.862.762.762.992.822.832.822.922.762.792.852.9733.022.933.032.892.752.752.862.852.662.892.893.013.032.792.762.952.812.822.712.842.822.692.753.12.82.772.783.13.012.792.832.993.053.162.833.042.893.042.892.92.852.882.882.92.923.082.23.253.212.882.82.882.872.813.062.973.242.362.883.212.382.472.682.722.792.842.522.51.9061.7092.031.8232.031.9662.072.512.852.712.812.852.742.642.762.762.742.682.822.782.672.662.782.692.692.682.72.82.662.652.622.852.962.592.552.672.712.642.712.82.742.652.912.882.592.582.743.052.662.632.742.742.812.762.622.72.722.672.72.692.852.722.672.72.822.682.692.742.842.722.711.4131.7241.5351.3761.2751.3341.451.4011.2521.3461.2391.6871.3481.2631.4781.2861.3781.2561.3141.2881.5211.3371.2271.2471.4771.2941.2751.4981.4491.3971.4381.2161.3771.251.2351.5171.5131.2411.2371.5651.3791.3341.2531.2431.591.4891.361.2421