关于 OnePlus Nord 6 的评价
OnePlus 的 Nord 6（在中国被称为 Turbo 6）再次证明，它可以制造出非常高品质的智能手机。这款中端价位的手机提供了一些顶级功能，如闪电般快速的内存和超大电池。此外，它还配备了明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕，帧频高达 165 Hz，尽管高帧频很少使用。
尽管存在内存危机，但这款智能手机仍有高达 16 GB 内存的型号。80 瓦的最大充电速度非常高，但没有无线充电功能。
欧洲用户已经习惯了不带充电器的事实，但电池也明显弱于中国机型。不过，续航时间令人印象深刻。
在某些方面需要做出一些妥协：例如，只有一个 USB 2.0 端口，没有图像输出，照相系统也不太灵活，但拍照效果不错。
总的来说，OnePlus Nord 6 是一款高品质的智能手机，它的大电池和极快的内存给人留下了深刻印象。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在测试期间，OnePlus Nord 6 已经在欧洲的一些在线零售商处有售。
- $807.49OnePlus 15, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 7300mAh Battery, Infinite Black
- $238.35OnePlus 9 Pro, 5G Android Smartphone U.S Version,12GB RAM+256GB Storage,120Hz Fluid Display,Hasselblad Quad Camera, Fully Unlocked (Morning Mist) (Renewed)
- $604.49OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 7400mAh Battery, Mint Breeze
规格
箱子和设备 - 塑料完好
OnePlus Nord 6 看起来并不像一款中端设备，即使外壳和边框仅由塑料制成：背面采用了磨砂表面的玻璃外观，OnePlus 徽标采用了铣削工艺，背景为亮面。虽然该设备的触感并非完全没有吱吱声，但其整体做工非常坚固。
外壳防水防尘，甚至可以在浅水中游泳或潜水时使用，这要归功于 IP68/IP69K 防护等级。
欧洲市场有配备 8GB 或 12GB 内存以及 256GB 或 512GB 大容量存储空间的机型。在中国，Turbo 6 也有配备 16GB 内存的机型。
遗憾的是，制造商只安装了一个 USB 2.0 端口，这意味着无法进行有线图像输出。不过，有一个红外线发射器，可用于远程控制电视等。
通讯和操作 - 快速解锁
配备了 WiFi 7，因此较少使用的 6 GHz 频段也可用于网络。在这里，Nord 6 的数据传输速率非常快，因此也可以充分利用千兆互联网线路。不过，在我们的测试过程中，速度会出现波动。
屏幕每秒最多可显示 165 幅图像，但这在日常生活中几乎用不到。不过，它对输入的反应非常可靠和迅速。指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕后面，解锁手机几乎无需等待。还可以通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别，但仅限于 2D 模式。
| Networking | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| OnePlus Nord 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件与可持续发展--2032 年之前一切顺利
Android 16 预装在 OnePlus Nord 6 上，安全补丁的日期从 2026 年 3 月开始。根据制造商的说法，将有四个新的Android 版本和六年的安全更新，即直到 2032 年。
关于可持续发展的信息很少，但至少包装是无塑料的。
照相机 - 随处可见的清晰照片
OnePlus Nord 6 的摄像头系统由背面的主摄像头和超广角摄像头以及正面的自拍摄像头组成。
首先是主摄像头：它能拍摄出非常出色的照片，而且还可以放大。图像的清晰度尤其给我们留下了深刻的印象。即使在弱光环境下，清晰度也很高，系统还能很好地选择曝光。
视频可以 4K 和高达 60 fps 的速度录制。这里的图像质量也很高。
广角照片看起来也很细腻，但在放大率方面存在不足。不过，对于抓拍来说已经足够了。
自拍摄像头的分辨率为 3200 万像素，在我们的测试照片中显示出良好的照明效果。不过，在明亮区域可能会丢失动态范围。总的来说，我们喜欢这样拍出来的照片。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
显示屏 - 色彩快速 OLED
OnePlus 采用 AMOLED 屏幕，但亮度不如竞争对手。因此，如果你经常观看 HDR 电影，并重视高亮度，你可能会感到失望。
该屏幕的亮度足以满足日常使用，甚至是户外使用。
如果选择 "自然 "设置，色彩还原也非常准确。
由于会出现 PWM 闪烁，所以敏感人士应提前测试屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1159 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.08 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.236
CCT: 6708 K
| OnePlus Nord 6 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | OnePlus Nord 5 AMOLED, 2800x1272, 6.8" | Nothing Phone (4a) AMOLED, 2720x1224, 6.8" | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -60% | -35% | -10% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1159 | 1162 0% | 1536 33% | 1501 30% | 1699 47% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1131 | 1130 0% | 1538 36% | 1476 31% | 1709 51% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 95 0% | 97 2% | 96 1% | 99 4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.08 | 3.24 -200% | 2.6 -141% | 1.52 -41% | 1.7 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.41 | 6.54 -171% | 5.7 -137% | 3.47 -44% | 3.4 -41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.7 11% | 2 -5% | 2.6 -37% | 1.8 5% |
| Gamma | 2.236 98% | 2.212 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.184 101% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6708 97% | 6788 96% | 6878 95% | 6444 101% | 6660 98% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| OnePlus Nord 5 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90.6 Hz Amplitude: 17 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 90.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90.6 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7841 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 最大功率
高通 高通骁龙 8s 第 4 代处理器OnePlus Nord 6 的强大性能使其在同价位竞争产品中脱颖而出。我们的测试设备通常在计算能力和图形计算方面都遥遥领先。不过，也有一些设备的人工智能计算速度更快。
说到大容量存储，OnePlus 全力以赴，尽管目前还存在不足：UFS 4.1 是最快的闪存之一，因此 OnePlus 手机的加载时间和数据传输都非常快。
如果手机长时间处于高负荷运行状态，外壳会明显发热，这可能会带来问题。长时间负载后，系统性能也会明显下降。
扬声器可以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音，但偶尔在全音量时会显得力不从心。如果将音量调低，就能获得不错的音效，但低音就别指望了。
说到电池，许多西方国家的人会感到苦恼：OnePlus Nord 6 的全球版本只有 7500 毫安时电池，而中国版本则有 9000 毫安时。不过，在我们的 WLAN 测试中，该手机的续航时间超过了 23 小时。
得益于超过 80 瓦的充电能力和一个合适的充电器，我们可以在一小时左右为电池充电。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (174.8 - 245, n=5) | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | |
| OnePlus Nord 5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | OnePlus Nord 5 | Nothing Phone (4a) | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -49% | -46% | -34% | -67% | -8% | -39% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3562 | 1894 -47% | 2003.93 -44% | 2049.4 -42% | 1034.37 -71% | 3636 ? 2% | 2248 ? -37% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3544 | 1852 -48% | 1596.2 -55% | 1825.9 -48% | 987.09 -72% | 3185 ? -10% | 1930 ? -46% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 503 | 250 -50% | 263.22 -48% | 351.2 -30% | 171.52 -66% | 412 ? -18% | 308 ? -39% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 528 | 268 -49% | 325.75 -38% | 452.1 -14% | 213.85 -59% | 494 ? -6% | 360 ? -32% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.9 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| OnePlus Nord 5 | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| OnePlus Nord 5 | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| OnePlus Nord 5 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| OnePlus Nord 5 | |
| OnePlus Nord 6 | |
OnePlus Nord 6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| OnePlus Nord 6 7500 mAh | OnePlus Nord 5 5200 mAh | Nothing Phone (4a) 5080 mAh | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 7000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G 6500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -26% | -22% | 6% | -6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 23.1 | 17.2 -26% | 18 -22% | 24.5 6% | 21.7 -6% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 35.4 | 39.3 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 19 | ||||
| Load (h) | 4.5 | 5.4 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
大功率、大电池、时尚设计--OnePlus Nord 6 没有辜负自己的期望。
不过，USB 端口和不太灵活的相机系统是它的缺点。
OnePlus Nord 6
- 05/20/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83%  | OnePlus Nord 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $807.49 OnePlus 15, 12GB RAM + 256GB... 2. $238.35 OnePlus 9 Pro, 5G Android Sm... 3. $604.49 OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256G... List Price: 499€ | 210 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
2. 80.5%  | OnePlus Nord 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 449€ | 211 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.83" 2800x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
3. 78.6%  | Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 429€ | 204.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2720x1224 440 PPI AMOLED |
4. 77.4%  | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 420€ | 193 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
5. 79.4%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: List Price: 530€ | 208 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
