对华为 Nova 14 Pro 的评价
华为仍在继续努力：虽然受到制裁，但华为自己的软件生态系统现已成为谷歌 Play 服务的真正替代品。但更大的问题依然存在：在欧洲，华为手机没有 5G 功能。
这是一个极大的遗憾，因为华为 Nova 14 Pro 是一款非常出色的智能手机。尤其是它的摄像头，其成像效果是通常价格贵一倍的手机所望尘莫及的。当然，它没有潜望镜变焦，但可变光圈可以实现自然的模糊效果，甚至可以在照片中进行调整。
前置摄像头还能拍出精彩的人像照片，无论你是独自一人还是与人合影。变焦能力也非常出色，最高可放大 10 倍左右。
电池续航能力相当一般，尤其是在欧洲，电池容量略有减少。不过，WiFi 7 的速度很快，屏幕即使在晴天也足够明亮。处理器性能与同价位的设备相比还算可以，但小米表明，这个价格可以买到更多的东西。
华为 Nova 14 Pro 是一款不寻常的高端智能手机，遗憾的是，它在某些方面跟不上竞争对手的步伐，但却提供了非常出色的相机系统。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
这款手机在亚马逊（amazon.de）上的售价为 599 欧元起（含耳机）。
您也可以凭优惠券直接从华为购买，价格为 599 欧元。
- NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Protector for Huawei Nova 14 [6.70 Inch],[Anti-Spy Film],Scratch-Resistant, Easy Install [2 Pack]
- UOGNADGD 6-Pack Tempered Glass Screen Protector Compatible with Huawei Nova 14 Pro (6.78 inch), [Maximum Protection] from Drops & Scratches, 9H Hardness
- Kepuch Screen Protector Compatible for Huawei Nova 14 Pro 6.78" - Tempered Glass 2 Pack
规格
表壳和功能 - 冰晶设计
华为 Nova 14 Pro 有哑光黑和淡蓝色两种颜色可供选择，玻璃后壳在光线折射下呈现出时尚的冰晶效果。带有两个 LED 闪光灯的摄像头模块偏移了两倍，使其在纤薄的机身中显得格外突出。
该机的制造质量非常高，没有任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。甚至用手指也感觉不到材料的过渡。不过，这款手机重 207 克，明显高于同类手机。
机身具有 IP65 防尘和防液体保护，但手机不能浸泡在水中。
遗憾的是，USB 端口不支持 USB 3.0 协议，因此无法向外部显示器发送图像信号。不过，这在这个价位的手机中并不常见。
只有一种内存规格，配备 12GB 内存和 512GB 大容量存储。无法通过 microSD 进行扩展。
通信和操作 - 无线网络很好，但移动网络...
华为安装了快速 Wi-Fi 7，在我们的测试中，这款手机的数据传输速率也非常快且稳定。
不过，你只能使用 4G 进行移动通信。虽然 Nova 14 Pro 的中国机型已经搭载了 5G 技术，但由于制裁原因，它无法在欧洲激活。
触摸屏使用起来非常流畅，对输入的响应也非常可靠。通过 Air 手势，还可以在远离屏幕的地方进行手势操作；这些手势可以通过前置摄像头识别，并实现滚动等功能。
| Networking | |
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Fairphone 6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件与可持续性 - 替代环境
HarmonyOS 现在提供了大量Android 上熟悉的应用程序。在手机上安装和激活谷歌服务也非常简单。
唯一不能使用的功能是谷歌支付。不过，华为与 Bluecode 合作提供了一个替代方案，从而为欧洲用户提供了一个选择。
遗憾的是，没有关于该设备可持续性的信息；包装中仍使用塑料薄膜。
相机 - 高质量照片
Nova 14 Pro 的亮点在于其与众不同的相机设备。例如，前置有两个自拍摄像头，还能实现广角群组自拍。我们喜欢照片的质量，即使是明亮的背景通常也能提供不错的质量。
使用 5000 万像素主摄像头拍摄的照片看起来非常锐利，细节丰富，色彩也比大多数竞争对手要温暖一些。环境图像也与高端相机相当，在弱光环境下仍能保持较高的清晰度。
得益于主摄像头的可变光圈，拍摄人像时也能获得非常自然的模糊效果。
长焦摄像头的变焦倍数可达 3 倍；此时图像依然清晰，但当变焦倍数超过 10 倍时，图像会出现不自然的模糊。广角摄像头可拍摄合格的全景照片，但细节看起来比较粗糙。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle
显示屏 - 采用明亮 OLED 显示屏的华为手机
OLED 屏幕亮度不错，在明亮的日子里也能在户外使用。不过，HDR 亮度不如一些竞争对手强。不过，色彩显示非常自然。
我们测得在低亮度下会出现 PWM 闪烁，频率约为 120 Hz，因此敏感人群在购买前应先试用屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1157 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.73 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.246
CCT: 6680 K
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro P-OLED, 2776x1224, 6.8" | Huawei Nova 11 Pro OLED, 2652x1200, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro AMOLED, 2510x1156, 6.6" | Fairphone 6 pOLED, 2484x1116, 6.3" | Motorola Edge 60 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -93% | -8% | -89% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1157 | 729 -37% | 1717 48% | 737 -36% | 1099 -5% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1141 | 719 -37% | 1721 51% | 736 -35% | 1073 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 92 -5% | 98 1% | 97 0% | 91 -6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.73 | 1.39 -90% | 1 -37% | 1.6 -119% | 1.25 -71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.43 | 4.74 -231% | 2.2 -54% | 3.9 -173% | 1.68 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.8 -155% | 1.7 -55% | 3 -173% | 1.4 -27% |
| Gamma | 2.246 98% | 2.271 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.031 108% |
| CCT | 6680 97% | 6738 96% | 6574 99% | 6706 97% | 6403 102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Fairphone 6 | |
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Fairphone 6 | |
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120.6 Hz Amplitude: 14 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120.6 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8013 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.28 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间--功率不大
麒麟 8020 海思麒麟 8020被用作 SoC。它的性能符合该价格区间的预期，但在图形和人工智能计算方面却远远落后。
在负载情况下，机箱会明显发热，但 SoC 的节流始终保持在最低水平。
扬声器的音量可以再大一些，但音质还不错。不过，蓝牙音频编解码器的选择非常有限。
电池容量为 5100 毫安时，有点小，在我们的 WLAN 测试中只能提供约 16 小时的续航时间。这足够一天不充电使用，但其他智能手机的电池续航时间更长。
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro | Huawei Nova 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | Fairphone 6 | Motorola Edge 60 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -44% | 46% | 2% | 59% | -19% | -10% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2061.8 | 1009.1 -51% | 3959.14 92% | 1973.22 -4% | 3852.89 87% | 1879 ? -9% | 2148 ? 4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 2053.4 | 809 -61% | 3833.02 87% | 2006.71 -2% | 3842.42 87% | 1357 ? -34% | 1848 ? -10% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 293 | 229.8 -22% | 309.91 6% | 358.89 22% | 439.58 50% | 290 ? -1% | 295 ? 1% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 531.3 | 303 -43% | 521.31 -2% | 487.48 -8% | 585.66 10% | 361 ? -32% | 347 ? -35% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro | |
| Fairphone 6 | |
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro | |
| Fairphone 6 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Huawei Nova 14 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Huawei Nova 14 Pro 5100 mAh | Huawei Nova 11 Pro 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 6210 mAh | Fairphone 6 4415 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -27% | 44% | 4% | 42% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 23.9 | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 15.8 | 11.5 -27% | 22.8 44% | 16.5 4% | 22.4 42% |
| Load (h) | 4.1 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
一款拥有出色照相系统的高端智能手机。遗憾的是，它也有缺点，比如电池续航时间。
Huawei Nova 14 Pro
- 02/18/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 79.3%  | Huawei Nova 14 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 8020 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote... 2. UOGNADGD 6-Pack Tempered Gla... 3. Kepuch Screen Protector Comp... List Price: 699€ | 207 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2776x1224 447 PPI P-OLED |
2. 86.4% v7 (old)  | Huawei Nova 11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 642L ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... 2. Huawei Supercharge 88W USB-C... 3. Jiajihua Compatible with Hua... List Price: 699€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2652x1200 429 PPI OLED |
3. 85.4%  | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 P... 2. beukei 3 Pack Compatible wit... 3. Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 P... List Price: 700€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2510x1156 419 PPI AMOLED |
4. 79.2%  | Fairphone 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. GXLYFG 3 Pack Tempered Glass... 2. Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. MOOISVS [2 Pack for FairPhon... List Price: 599€ | 191.4 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.31" 2484x1116 432 PPI pOLED |
5. 81.5%  | Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. Motorola Moto Edge 60 Pro 5G... 2. Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... 3. Ibywind For Motorola Edge 60... List Price: 600 Euro | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
