Notebookcheck

诺基亚G50智能手机评测--中档手机的3年升级版

5G是肯定的。 广角摄像头、快速移动互联网、大电池--乍一看,诺基亚G50似乎拥有当今中档手机所需的一切。但它是否比竞争对手更好?我们想在测试中找到答案。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone
诺基亚G50
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Nokia G50 (G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.82 inch 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 252 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n28/​n40/​n41/​n38/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 173.8 x 77.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio; SAR: 1.149W/​kg (head), 1.126W/​kg (body), fanless
Weight
220 g
Price
280 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
78.5 %
11/2021
Nokia G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.82"1560x720
80.9 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.9 %
09/2021
Motorola Moto G60s
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
212 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.80"2480x1080
79.3 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720

箱子和设备--有大量内存的别致的东西

如果你将诺基亚G50与稍微昂贵的 诺基亚X10,唯一的区别是在细节方面:G50的屏幕分辨率较低,以及缺乏IP认证和微距镜头。诺基亚 诺基亚X10更小一些,但重量与G50一样,电池也更小。

塑料背壳有耀眼的蓝色或玫瑰色可供选择。设计很讨人喜欢,而且圆形的相机模块也很特别。稳定性还算不错。诺基亚G50是一个相当大的智能手机,也比同类设备重一些。

也有64GB的型号,但目前只有128GB大容量存储和4GB内存的型号在中欧上市。官方称,该设备的价格略低于270欧元(约合304美元)。对于这些钱,你可以得到一个USB-C端口,一个3.5毫米音频端口,NFC和2个SIM卡插槽,其中一个还可以作为microSD读卡器使用。我们用我们的参考卡Angelbird V60测试了阅读器的速度。它与同类产品持平,但并没有从其他设备中脱颖而出。

诺基亚G50
诺基亚G50
诺基亚G50
诺基亚G50
诺基亚G50

Size comparison

173.8 mm 77.7 mm 8.9 mm 220 g169.6 mm 75.9 mm 9.6 mm 212 g164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.8 - 55.3, n=48, last 2 years)
26.1 MB/s ∼100% +26%
Motorola Moto G60s
  (Angelbird V60)
22.9 MB/s ∼88% +11%
Nokia G50
  (Angelbird V60)
20.7 MB/s ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s ∼72% -9%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580853939.642.438.538.542.239.632.134.336.63436.136.136.730.433.62936.83532.534.135.135.835.429.436.136.933.838.931.63633.836.433.431.334.335.636.836.433.533.733.831.633.534.933.536.333.827.63533.534.335.235.933.832.432.136.734.337.633.936.437.235.533.836.735.629.533.63535.832.929.633.934.530.633.138.432.836.335.336.335.336.336.836.13535.431.639.434.735.531.930.533.336.230.73537.433.933.637.235.334.932.733.935.736.635.934.135.934.536.333.737.333.635.931.733.830.429.338.934.535.933.737.433.47.624949.749.950.74650.949.341.536.744.243.741.441.541.742.44041.139.338.242.940.735.44240.942.642.242.337.937.941.642.4404342.841.339.74238.935.540.941.142.843.636.842.242.943.635.842.341.341.640.141.542.241.740.237.242.238.643.339.741.742.241.641.737.240.239.344.243.642.14040.842.742.43646.943.543.246.245.243.345.344.238.840.54344.144.943.54145.240.744.540.342.845.639.943.443.745.543.644.544.235.944.846.644.840.943.242.64544.246.637.646464543.244.945.146.642.739.145.743.842.341.632.635.23836.535.13224.421.724.326.323.926.324.229.824.921.914.221.819.830.118.627.61524.829.818.316.717.328.611.226.322.927.516.118.822.928.226.119.427.616.630.9202723.910.122.821.828.117.215.716.822.418.827.517.723.921.627.11829.420.824.822.325.928.719.824.42026.520.332.53016.624.817.927.119.429.320.725.617.527.730.619.826.725.13331.918.119.72523.927.128.625.425.226.91215.618.824.916.216.316.624.824.52425.126.117.820.716.11927.717.418.925.72221.721.522.318.726.217.41724.418.23939.642.438.538.542.239.632.134.336.63436.136.136.730.433.62936.83532.534.135.135.835.429.436.136.933.838.931.63633.836.433.431.334.335.636.836.433.533.733.831.633.534.933.536.333.827.63533.534.335.235.933.832.432.136.734.337.633.936.437.235.533.836.735.629.533.63535.832.929.633.934.530.633.138.432.836.335.336.335.336.336.836.13535.431.639.434.735.531.930.533.336.230.73537.433.933.637.235.334.932.733.935.736.635.934.135.934.536.333.737.333.635.931.733.830.429.338.934.535.933.737.433.47.624949.749.950.74650.949.341.536.744.243.741.441.541.742.44041.139.338.242.940.735.44240.942.642.242.337.937.941.642.4404342.841.339.74238.935.540.941.142.843.636.842.242.943.635.842.341.341.640.141.542.241.740.237.242.238.643.339.741.742.241.641.737.240.239.344.243.642.14040.842.742.43646.943.543.246.245.243.345.344.238.840.54344.144.943.54145.240.744.540.342.845.639.943.443.745.543.644.544.235.944.846.644.840.943.242.64544.246.637.646464543.244.945.146.642.739.145.743.842.341.632.635.23836.535.13224.421.724.326.323.926.324.229.824.921.914.221.819.830.118.627.61524.829.818.316.717.328.611.226.322.927.516.118.822.928.226.119.427.616.630.9202723.910.122.821.828.117.215.716.822.418.827.517.723.921.627.11829.420.824.822.325.928.719.824.42026.520.332.53016.624.817.927.119.429.320.725.617.527.730.619.826.725.13331.918.119.72523.927.128.625.425.226.91215.618.824.916.216.316.624.824.52425.126.117.820.716.11927.717.418.925.72221.721.522.318.726.217.41724.418.231.179.279.777.97978.478.278.678.878.878.678.379.178.978.879.476.578.979.277.379.677.975.875.68278.275.5747978.778.979.677.877.981.976.97679.980.678.679.977.177.280.178.579.475.479.974.679.480.973.281.377.478.57878.574.478.577.379.274.477.378.77878.979.276.680.177.480.175.683.575.379.479.279.676.978.574.475.373.87877.28076.278.976.9807673.378.478.879.477.677.480.578.278.179.38176.380.479.180.280.177.479.978.679.378.779.178.778.678.478.578.462.262.362.650.663.161.863.862.434.570.661.750.785.585.185.285.382.685.585.584.785.284.985.585.585.484.985.28380.285.284.885.58585.285.485.285.186.385.284.685.585.985.185.884.385.884.585.684.785.384.985.485.385.18584.885.284.685.785.585.385.584.485.285.685.284.785.685.385.384.984.285.985.284.985.984.58585.384.7858585.685.385.484.58585.685.384.885.18685.285.384.884.786.384.882.787.784.785.585.584.385.984.786.184.984.785.685.685.384.885.58585.185.684.685.385.585.784.985.185.685.985.184.985.284.885.484.984.885.985.583.584.784.985.689.260.176.276.876.776.275.677.376.577.477.276.67677.377.476.176.676.776.477.175.577.476.977.275.976.277.57775.177.276.776.977.277.375.877.476.977.175.577.477.576.976.976.576.476.677.776.976.277.676.576.575.977.176.276.776.576.576.575.777.975.977.776.17776.576.674.578.378.176.276.676.875.678.57676.277.876.276.676.277.676.876.376.277.676.476.675.377.476.876.376.876.176.277.276.776.776.275.777.577.376787676.276.377.876.676.777.776.276.676.476.776.576.677.67776.376.277.376.876.675.976.174.572.376.9Tooltip
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (7.62-42.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø42.4 (35.4-50.9)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø23.2 (10.1-38)
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø76.3 (31.1-83.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (50.7-89.2)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø76.5 (60.1-78.5)

通信、软件和操作--诺基亚G50中的5G

诺基亚G50在Wi-Fi速度方面可以跟上这个价格区间的其他智能手机,并且由于Wi-Fi 5的存在,可以为日常使用提供足够快的网络。5G在这个价格区间还不是理所当然的,但诺基亚G50可以实现。这款智能手机足以满足4G频率的要求,但它显然不是一款可以到处使用的世界手机。

诺基亚的G50是Android-One计划的一部分,该计划通过相当接近谷歌的VanillaAndroid ,使操作系统的更新特别容易。因此,诺基亚能够保证2年的操作系统更新和3年的安全更新,即使是相对便宜的智能手机。这些期限从G50上市时就开始有效。我们测试设备上的安全更新是从2021年10月开始的,因此在测试时是最新的。

在外壳的左边有一个专门的谷歌助理按钮,指纹传感器被整合到右边的待机按钮上。它工作可靠且相当迅速。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G60s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (334min - 351max) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Nokia G50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
322 (308min - 331max) MBit/s ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s ∼82% -12%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Nokia G50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (294min - 350max) MBit/s ∼93%
Motorola Moto G60s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
327 (260min - 333max) MBit/s ∼89% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s ∼87% -6%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340329340336340348350345326295294338344348343345350347348340345347347345341345347349339348346329340336340348350345326295294338344348343345350347348340345347347345341345347349339348346308315317319318328322330325326325322328323327324325327323326322322326324331318324320321311Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø340 (294-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (308-331)

照相机--不完全清晰

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

G50的相机上没有蔡司标签,就像更昂贵的诺基亚X型号那样,但相机的技术规格与那些 诺基亚X10.一个4800万像素的主摄像头,如果需要的话,可以通过像素分选来收集更多的光线,但此时只能拍摄1200万像素的照片。此外,还有一个500万像素的广角镜头和一个200万像素的深度传感器来协助。然而,G50中没有微距相机。

主摄像头拍摄的照片还算合格,但它们在细节上看起来相当有颗粒感,有时会有明显的冲淡效果。在弱光和高对比度的情况下,黑暗区域缺乏活力,但细节仍然相当清晰。机上还有一个广角摄像头;对于快照来说,它是足够的,但你不应该把照片放大太多。

前置摄像头在光线良好的情况下可以拍摄可用的自拍,其中一些细节仍然可见。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera LandscapeWide-angle camera Low LightWide-angle camera
click to load images
ColorChecker
21.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
21 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G50: 13.92 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 24.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
44 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
34 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
75.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
82.4 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G50: 45.82 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 82.38 ∆E

显示屏 - IPS屏幕,分辨率低

根据我们的测试结果,具有扩展的720p分辨率的IPS屏幕可能不会成为发光或色彩再现方面的冠军,但有 Redmi Note 10S其全高清AMOLED屏幕。

然而,诺基亚G50的屏幕也有不错的表现。当需要时,它的亮度为525cd/m²,甚至提供了一个相当好的黑色水平,这反过来又将对比度提高到了一个高水平。

同样令人高兴的是,我们只在非常低的亮度下注意到PWM,其频率如此之高,应该不会对任何人造成任何问题。

481
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 568 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 525.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.62 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 568 cd/m²
Contrast: 2367:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.31 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
91.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.517
Nokia G50
IPS, 1560x720, 6.82
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G60s
IPS, 2480x1080, 6.80
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
26%
30%
-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52 ?(25, 27)
4.8 ?(2.4, 2.4)
91%
38 ?(19, 19)
27%
66.8 ?(32, 34.8)
-28%
Response Time Black / White *
33 ?(17, 16)
4 ?(2, 2)
88%
22 ?(11, 11)
33%
40.8 ?(19.2, 21.6)
-24%
PWM Frequency
2358000 ?(15)
250 ?(57)
-100%
Screen
42%
-1%
-29%
Brightness middle
568
706
24%
602
6%
543
-4%
Brightness
525
701
34%
564
7%
512
-2%
Brightness Distribution
85
98
15%
83
-2%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.24
0.56
-133%
0.63
-163%
Contrast
2367
1075
-55%
862
-64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.31
2.1
60%
2.23
58%
4.9
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.04
4.9
46%
3.99
56%
8.6
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.6
1.5
73%
2.6
54%
6.3
-13%
Gamma
2.517 87%
2.29 96%
2.32 95%
2.23 99%
CCT
7541 86%
6447 101%
7127 91%
8120 80%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 37%
15% / 5%
-28% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358000 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21061 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--图形性能有所下降

骁龙480在许多诺基亚设备中都能找到,这可能是由于芯片短缺的原因。制造商只是获得了大量相当普遍可用的SoC。在诺基亚的G50中,它实际上也为这个价格范围提供了合适的计算能力,但它在图形性能方面落后于同类设备,其屏幕的分辨率部分较低。因此,那些经常玩耍并希望花钱买到尽可能多的动力的用户应该到其他地方去看看。

幸运的是,最大温升相当低:36.6 °C (97.9 °F),因为绝对最大值略为明显,但没有问题。在我们的测试中,诺基亚G50的单声道扬声器相当响亮,但声音相当差,缺乏低中音,高音量时高音轰鸣。至少目前所有的编解码器包括aptX自适应都可以通过蓝牙使用。

诺基亚G50配备了一个5000毫安时的电池,在这个价格范围内的许多设备中都有。与其他设备相比,这款手机的电池在运行时间方面表现平平。然而,在我们的WLAN测试中,16:12小时仍然非常适用于日常使用,也应该足够正常使用两个工作日。该智能手机可以用最大的10瓦特充电,这意味着充电过程有时需要2个多小时。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
514 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points ∼83% -1%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
522 Points ∼85% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼77% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (504 - 520, n=7)
512 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=257, last 2 years)
613 Points ∼100% +19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1618 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points ∼81% +4%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1653 Points ∼80% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼73% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1618 - 1713, n=7)
1663 Points ∼80% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=257, last 2 years)
2073 Points ∼100% +28%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7111 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points ∼80% +16%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
8732 Points ∼85% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6928 - 8402, n=6)
7483 Points ∼73% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=79, last 2 years)
10313 Points ∼100% +45%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3666 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3120 Points ∼71% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼84% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3602 - 3666, n=7)
3640 Points ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=253, last 2 years)
4401 Points ∼100% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3872 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3335 Points ∼59% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼70% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3817 - 3872, n=7)
3840 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=253, last 2 years)
5690 Points ∼100% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3091 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2547 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3008 - 3118, n=7)
3078 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (640 - 5784, n=251, last 2 years)
3086 Points ∼100% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2476 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2587 Points ∼95% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2419 - 2478, n=7)
2442 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=223, last 2 years)
2729 Points ∼100% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2346 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2633 Points ∼91% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼87% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2287 - 2346, n=7)
2309 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=223, last 2 years)
2889 Points ∼100% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3071 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2436 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3017 - 3136, n=7)
3061 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=223, last 2 years)
2873 Points ∼94% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2587 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2682 Points ∼74% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼73% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2536 - 2587, n=7)
2563 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=255, last 2 years)
3618 Points ∼100% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2471 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2743 Points ∼65% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼61% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2440 - 2471, n=7)
2449 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=255, last 2 years)
4235 Points ∼100% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3093 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2488 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼93% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2941 - 3098, n=7)
3064 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (626 - 5793, n=255, last 2 years)
3120 Points ∼100% +1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
980 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1373 Points ∼44% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼40% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (980 - 986, n=7)
981 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=125, last 2 years)
3087 Points ∼100% +215%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
976 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1352 Points ∼42% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼38% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (969 - 978, n=7)
974 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=122, last 2 years)
3203 Points ∼100% +228%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
293 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
387 Points ∼39% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (290 - 294, n=6)
292 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=73, last 2 years)
992 Points ∼100% +239%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
288 Points ∼28%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
381 Points ∼38% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (284 - 288, n=6)
285 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=72, last 2 years)
1015 Points ∼100% +252%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼63% -34%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼53% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 30, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼66% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=266, last 2 years)
25.3 fps ∼84% -13%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
20 fps ∼67% +11%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼64% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼57% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (17 - 19, n=7)
18 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=266, last 2 years)
29.8 fps ∼100% +66%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼67% -33%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10 fps ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (9.9 - 19, n=7)
12.4 fps ∼69% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=267, last 2 years)
17 fps ∼94% -6%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.5 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7.4 fps ∼64% +14%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼59% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼54% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6.4 - 6.7, n=7)
6.54 fps ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=267, last 2 years)
11.5 fps ∼100% +77%
Nokia G50Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SMotorola Moto G60sSamsung Galaxy A32 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-23%
-28%
10%
-10%
2%
Sequential Read 256KB
514.6
498.76
-3%
498.53
-3%
858.19
67%
769 ?(427 - 1011, n=92)
49%
843 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=270, last 2 years)
64%
Sequential Write 256KB
486.6
371.98
-24%
200.54
-59%
381.69
-22%
270 ?(13.6 - 707, n=92)
-45%
382 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=270, last 2 years)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
182
110.47
-39%
123.34
-32%
174.64
-4%
147 ?(92.6 - 239, n=92)
-19%
148 ?(13.5 - 325, n=270, last 2 years)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
166.5
120.97
-27%
135.34
-19%
167.15
0%
124 ?(18.2 - 290, n=92)
-26%
138 ?(5.5 - 330, n=270, last 2 years)
-17%

温度

Max. Load
 36.1 °C33.2 °C30.8 °C 
 35.2 °C32.8 °C30.8 °C 
 34.9 °C33.2 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 33.1 °C
28.6 °C33.2 °C36.6 °C
30.1 °C33.6 °C34 °C
31.2 °C34.3 °C35.2 °C
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 33 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.


热图背面
热图背面
热力图前线
热力图前线

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.547.52542.240.33133.834.84039.138.85044.142.86334.436.28025.630.310024.23012520.229.816021.237.120017.340.325018.148.831516.155.440015.46150016.468.163017.168.380020.872.4100020.979.4125017.979.9160018.179.720001877.2250018.874.1315019.869.8400020.571.5500020.868.2630021.674.1800022.377.7100002374.71250023.869.81600024.755.4SPL32.387.7N1.669.8median 20.2median 69.8Delta210.13032.926.725.625.624.526.121.636.434.629.222.62528.217.824.918.328.818.638.917.442.214.247.815.955.912.857.81462.713.368.712.274.412.376.411.977.912.876.212.777.512.17812.978.713.28013.47913.677.213.473.113.970.5147114.266.725.288.90.775median 13.4median 711.212.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia G50Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia G50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Nokia G50
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G60s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
972
1087
12%
763
-22%
1235
27%
904 ?(442 - 1953, n=275, last 2 years)
-7%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 12min

Pros

+ 更新承诺
+ 5G能力
+ 快速的WLAN
+ 别致、稳定的外壳

Cons

- 相当重
- 相机质量一般
- 图形装置相对较慢
- 扬声器声音差

评语--5G的平均水平不错

审查中。诺基亚G50。测试设备由:
审查中。诺基亚G50。测试设备由:
数码港.com

诺基亚G50的外壳设计时尚,相当结实,你必须把它交给芬兰人。同时,这款智能手机的快速互联网和5G能力也令人信服。

诺基亚的G50是一款可靠的中端智能手机,由于有更新的承诺,它可以陪伴用户更久一些。

然而,这款智能手机在图形计算方面落后于同类手机。诺基亚G50相对较重,电池的寿命也不如其他同价位的智能手机长。由于模糊的细节和粗糙的表面绘制,相机并不真正令人信服。

总的来说,诺基亚提供了一个坚实的、相对便宜的5G中端设备,但它在竞争中有点黯然失色。的 Redmi Note 10S不提供5G,但它有一个更精细的AMOLED技术和全高清屏幕。随着三星Galaxy A32 5G你可以得到更长的运行时间和更好的扬声器。

价格和可用性

你可以直接从制造商那里获得诺基亚G50,网址是https://www.nokia.com/phones/de_de/nokia-g-50?sku=F16BYA1022033.如果你在互联网上找一找,比如在我们的借书处Cyberport,它就会便宜几欧元。,notebooksbilliger.de或在 亚马逊(美国).

Nokia G50 - 11/19/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 67%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
29 / 64 → 45%
Application Performance
72 / 86 → 84%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
52 / 90 → 58%
Camera
47%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 207612 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 诺基亚G50智能手机评测--中档手机的3年升级版
Florian Schmitt, 2021-11-24 (Update: 2021-11-24)