小米 Mi6 智能手机简短评测

Name: Xiaomi Mi 6
Brand: Xiaomi

内行建议。 正在寻找一台强劲的高端智能手机的用户，可以考虑一下小米Mi6。售价约400欧元（约450美元）的这款小米旗舰机型提供了丰富的功能，遗憾的是没有支持LTE-20频段。从我们的测试结果来看，第六代的Mi机型在一个方面很难与其他高端机型对抗。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 07/01/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Smartphone Touchscreen Android

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 6 (Mi 6 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.45 GHz, Kryo 280

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 540

Memory

6 GB

Display

5.15 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 428 PPI, 电容式，多点触控, LCD, IPS, 1尼特超暗模式和最高600尼特亮度, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 无3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: 无存储扩展, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 位置感应器，霍尔感应器，指南针，气压计，距离感应器, OTG, Miracast, LED状态指示灯, 计步器

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 4G 频段: FDD LTE: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8; 3G 频段: WCDMA 850/1900/2100 MHz; 2G 频段: GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 145.2 x 70.5

Battery

3350 mAh, Quickcharge 3.0

Operating System

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 4轴光学防抖, 长焦镜头 - 广角镜头
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器，欧标转接器，USB数据线，USB-C到3.5毫米转接器, MiUi 8, 12 Months Warranty, SAR n. b., fanless

Weight

168 g, Power Supply: 65 g

Price

400 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 MBit/s +30%
Xiaomi Mi 6 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	500 MBit/s
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (154^min) MBit/s -31%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	313 MBit/s -37%
HTC U Ultra Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB eMMC Flash	259 MBit/s -48%
Honor 8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	233 MBit/s -53%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	220 MBit/s -56%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 6 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	574 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	329 MBit/s -43%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	325 MBit/s -43%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	308 (48.8^min) MBit/s -46%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	257 MBit/s -55%
HTC U Ultra Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB eMMC Flash	247 MBit/s -57%
Honor 8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	236 MBit/s -59%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


554 cd/m²	620 cd/m²	593 cd/m²
568 cd/m²	620 cd/m²	584 cd/m²
564 cd/m²	599 cd/m²	575 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 620 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 586.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 620 cd/m²
Contrast: 2214:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.25

	Xiaomi Mi 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15	Xiaomi Mi 5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15	LG G6 IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.70	Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80	HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.70	Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.10	Honor 8 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 5.70	OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen		-5%	7%	20%	-16%	-13%	3%	-36%
Brightness middle	620	598 -4%	646 4%	566 -9%	470 -24%	547 -12%	541 -13%	421 -32%
Brightness	586	566 -3%	611 4%	564 -4%	445 -24%	556 -5%	514 -12%	430 -27%
Brightness Distribution	89	90 1%	89 0%	94 6%	88 -1%	86 -3%	91 2%	84 -6%
Black Level *	0.28	0.51 -82%	0.23 18%		0.22 21%	0.43 -54%	0.3 -7%
Contrast	2214	1173 -47%	2809 27%		2136 -4%	1272 -43%	1803 -19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.8	3.5 27%	4.5 6%	2.7 44%	5.5 -15%	4.8 -0%	3.2 33%	7.1 -48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.8	6.1 31%	8.3 6%	5.4 39%	11.9 -35%	8.8 -0%	7.2 18%	15.3 -74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.3	3.5 34%	6 -13%	3.1 42%	7.6 -43%	4.5 15%	4 25%	6.8 -28%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.29 ^96%	2.27 ^97%	2.15 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.39 ^92%	2.27 ^97%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7473 ^87%	6532 ^100%	7996 ^81%	6335 ^103%	7454 ^87%	7194 ^90%	7120 ^91%	7866 ^83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			67.74	81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			99.05	99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2315 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
20.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	25.19 MB/s
Xiaomi Mi 5	13.61 MB/s -46%
LG G6	16.58 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8	15.25 MB/s -39%
HTC U Ultra	13.7 MB/s -46%
Huawei P10	152.3 MB/s +505%
Honor 8 Pro	151.6 MB/s +502%
OnePlus 3T	74.4 MB/s +195%
HTC U11	80 MB/s +218%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	143.5 MB/s
Xiaomi Mi 5	106.8 MB/s -26%
LG G6	95.2 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8	127.2 MB/s -11%
HTC U Ultra	84.2 MB/s -41%
Huawei P10	168.4 MB/s +17%
Honor 8 Pro	166.4 MB/s +16%
OnePlus 3T	123.6 MB/s -14%
HTC U11	91.4 MB/s -36%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	196.7 MB/s
Xiaomi Mi 5	159.3 MB/s -19%
LG G6	122.8 MB/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8	193.2 MB/s -2%
HTC U Ultra	164.7 MB/s -16%
Huawei P10	189.8 MB/s -4%
Honor 8 Pro	187.1 MB/s -5%
OnePlus 3T	165.3 MB/s -16%
HTC U11	206.4 MB/s +5%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	728 MB/s
Xiaomi Mi 5	459.6 MB/s -37%
LG G6	428.7 MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8	793 MB/s +9%
HTC U Ultra	423.9 MB/s -42%
Huawei P10	738 MB/s +1%
Honor 8 Pro	738 MB/s +1%
OnePlus 3T	436.4 MB/s -40%
HTC U11	717 MB/s -2%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	181909 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	116330 Points -36%
LG G6	151751 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8	171884 Points -6%
HTC U Ultra	139017 Points -24%
Huawei P10	140084 Points -23%
Honor 8 Pro	146044 Points -20%
OnePlus 3T	159866 Points -12%
HTC U11	175032 Points -4%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	1938 Points
LG G6	1831 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1997 Points +3%
Huawei P10	1899 Points -2%
Honor 8 Pro	1853 Points -4%
HTC U11	1906 Points -2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	6714 Points
LG G6	4369 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6711 Points 0%
Huawei P10	6521 Points -3%
Honor 8 Pro	6245 Points -7%
HTC U11	6443 Points -4%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	1970 Points
HTC U Ultra	1643 Points
Huawei P10	1935 Points
OnePlus 3T	1881 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	6300 Points
HTC U Ultra	3983 Points
Huawei P10	6036 Points
OnePlus 3T	4236 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	41172 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	29246 Points -29%
LG G6	29276 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8	31532 Points -23%
HTC U Ultra	29668 Points -28%
Huawei P10	27692 Points -33%
Honor 8 Pro	25766 Points -37%
OnePlus 3T	30810 Points -25%
HTC U11	40014 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	58228 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	32613 Points -44%
LG G6	32128 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S8	36347 Points -38%
HTC U Ultra	33446 Points -43%
Huawei P10	35964 Points -38%
Honor 8 Pro	32243 Points -45%
OnePlus 3T	34494 Points -41%
HTC U11	55725 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	20330 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	21483 Points +6%
LG G6	22335 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8	21543 Points +6%
HTC U Ultra	21263 Points +5%
Huawei P10	15341 Points -25%
Honor 8 Pro	15129 Points -26%
OnePlus 3T	22426 Points +10%
HTC U11	20140 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	4978 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	3542 Points -29%
LG G6	3282 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4015 Points -19%
HTC U Ultra	2947 Points -41%
Huawei P10	2649 Points -47%
Honor 8 Pro	1865 Points -63%
OnePlus 3T	2577 Points -48%
HTC U11	4744 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	6231 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	4558 Points -27%
LG G6	4121 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4923 Points -21%
HTC U Ultra	3807 Points -39%
Huawei P10	2816 Points -55%
Honor 8 Pro	1856 Points -70%
OnePlus 3T	3310 Points -47%
HTC U11	5877 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	2921 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	1976 Points -32%
LG G6	1961 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2440 Points -16%
HTC U Ultra	1646 Points -44%
Huawei P10	2193 Points -25%
Honor 8 Pro	1896 Points -35%
OnePlus 3T	1452 Points -50%
HTC U11	2832 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	3775 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	2573 Points -32%
LG G6	2669 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3194 Points -15%
HTC U Ultra	2225 Points -41%
Huawei P10	2274 Points -40%
Honor 8 Pro	1832 Points -51%
OnePlus 3T	2221 Points -41%
HTC U11	3590 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	4072 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	2829 Points -31%
LG G6	2980 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3472 Points -15%
HTC U Ultra	2405 Points -41%
Huawei P10	2409 Points -41%
Honor 8 Pro	1746 Points -57%
OnePlus 3T	2418 Points -41%
HTC U11	3883 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	3007 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	1955 Points -35%
LG G6	1955 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2494 Points -17%
HTC U Ultra	1763 Points -41%
Huawei P10	1902 Points -37%
Honor 8 Pro	2216 Points -26%
OnePlus 3T	1728 Points -43%
HTC U11	2841 Points -6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	60 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	60 fps 0%
LG G6	46 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8	60 fps 0%
HTC U Ultra	46 fps -23%
Huawei P10	55 fps -8%
Honor 8 Pro	59 fps -2%
OnePlus 3T	59 fps -2%
HTC U11	58 fps -3%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	119 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	90 fps -24%
LG G6	75 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8	121 fps +2%
HTC U Ultra	74 fps -38%
Huawei P10	69 fps -42%
Honor 8 Pro	43 fps -64%
OnePlus 3T	91 fps -24%
HTC U11	91 fps -24%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	56 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	42 fps -25%
LG G6	27 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8	41 fps -27%
HTC U Ultra	23 fps -59%
Huawei P10	32 fps -43%
Honor 8 Pro	20 fps -64%
OnePlus 3T	45 fps -20%
HTC U11	29 fps -48%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	63 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	42 fps -33%
LG G6	38 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S8	62 fps -2%
HTC U Ultra	26 fps -59%
Huawei P10	30 fps -52%
Honor 8 Pro	29 fps -54%
OnePlus 3T	46 fps -27%
HTC U11	51 fps -19%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	42 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	31 fps -26%
LG G6	16 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy S8	23 fps -45%
HTC U Ultra	12 fps -71%
Huawei P10	25 fps -40%
Honor 8 Pro	13 fps -69%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps -24%
HTC U11	15 fps -64%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	43 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	30 fps -30%
LG G6	29 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8	24 fps -44%
HTC U Ultra	12 fps -72%
Huawei P10	24 fps -44%
Honor 8 Pro	21 fps -51%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps -26%
HTC U11	33 fps -23%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	26 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	19 fps -27%
LG G6	20 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8	25 fps -4%
HTC U Ultra	15 fps -42%
Huawei P10	15 fps -42%
Honor 8 Pro	15 fps -42%
OnePlus 3T	20 fps -23%
HTC U11	24 fps -8%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	26 fps
Xiaomi Mi 5	18 fps -31%
LG G6	11 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8	13 fps -50%
HTC U Ultra	8.4 fps -68%
Huawei P10	16 fps -38%
Honor 8 Pro	11 fps -58%
OnePlus 3T	20 fps -23%
HTC U11	13 fps -50%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	7548 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	6873 Points -9%
LG G6	5703 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6035 Points -20%
HTC U Ultra	5217 Points -31%
Huawei P10	7341 Points -3%
Honor 8 Pro	7356 Points -3%
OnePlus 3T	5664 Points -25%
HTC U11	8295 Points +10%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	733 Points
LG G6	647 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1276 Points +74%
Huawei P10	664 Points -9%
HTC U11	812 Points +11%

Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	38773 Points
LG G6	35449 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8	42183 Points +9%
Huawei P10	37968 Points -2%
HTC U11	38752 Points 0%

Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	60.1 fps
LG G6	59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8	59.8 fps 0%
Huawei P10	60.5 fps +1%
HTC U11	60 fps 0%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	32.14 fps
LG G6	24.34 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8	30.64 fps -5%
Huawei P10	23.56 fps -27%
HTC U11	36.58 fps +14%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	3694 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	2392 Points -35%
LG G6	2496 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3277 Points -11%
HTC U Ultra	2078 Points -44%
Huawei P10	2621 Points -29%
Honor 8 Pro	2985 Points -19%
OnePlus 3T	2218 Points -40%
HTC U11	3034 Points -18%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	5857 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	3638 Points -38%
LG G6	3646 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8	5386 Points -8%
HTC U Ultra	2834 Points -52%
Huawei P10	3830 Points -35%
Honor 8 Pro	4029 Points -31%
OnePlus 3T	3130 Points -47%
HTC U11	5570 Points -5%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	4054 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	1801 Points -56%
LG G6	1930 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3039 Points -25%
HTC U Ultra	1581 Points -61%
Huawei P10	2778 Points -31%
Honor 8 Pro	4277 Points +6%
OnePlus 3T	1954 Points -52%
HTC U11	2085 Points -49%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	6206 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	4522 Points -27%
LG G6	5138 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6096 Points -2%
HTC U Ultra	4591 Points -26%
Huawei P10	4115 Points -34%
Honor 8 Pro	4070 Points -34%
OnePlus 3T	4444 Points -28%
HTC U11	5976 Points -4%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	1263 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	1106 Points -12%
LG G6	1073 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1156 Points -8%
HTC U Ultra	907 Points -28%
Huawei P10	1077 Points -15%
Honor 8 Pro	1131 Points -10%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -29%
HTC U11	1221 Points -3%

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	3409 Points
Huawei P10	1909 Points -44%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	8356 Points
Huawei P10	10073 Points +21%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	15128 Points
Huawei P10	14902 Points -1%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	74793 Points
Huawei P10	47087 Points -37%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	266992 Points
Huawei P10	271402 Points +2%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	13267 Points
Huawei P10	9242 Points -30%

ANDEBench PRO
3D (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	94.8 fps
Huawei P10	52.3 fps -45%
HTC U11	102.9 fps +9%
Platform (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	328.1 Points
Huawei P10	601 Points +83%
HTC U11	707 Points +115%
Storage (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	10067 KB/s
Huawei P10	32085 KB/s +219%
HTC U11	102517 KB/s +918%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	5013 KOps/s
Huawei P10	6482 KOps/s +29%
HTC U11	6072 KOps/s +21%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	17196 MB/s
Huawei P10	21024 MB/s +22%
HTC U11	13891 MB/s -19%
Device Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	17330 Points
Huawei P10	19661 Points +13%
HTC U11	26076 Points +50%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	2668 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 5	2973 ms * -11%
LG G6	2464 ms * +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1887 ms * +29%
HTC U Ultra	4141 ms * -55%
Huawei P10	3129 ms * -17%
Honor 8 Pro	3157 ms * -18%
OnePlus 3T	2719 ms * -2%
HTC U11	2760 ms * -3%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	11909 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	8619 Points -28%
LG G6	9113 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8	12941 Points +9%
HTC U Ultra	5511 Points -54%
Huawei P10	10236 Points -14%
Honor 8 Pro	10016 Points -16%
OnePlus 3T	9798 Points -18%
HTC U11	11781 Points -1%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6	70.5 Points
Xiaomi Mi 5	54 Points -23%
LG G6	56.6 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8	65.8 Points -7%
HTC U Ultra	45.08 Points -36%
Huawei P10	57.9 Points -18%
Honor 8 Pro	58.1 Points -18%
OnePlus 3T	54.5 Points -23%
HTC U11	69.5 Points -1%

Legend

Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... in comparison

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	60 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


39.4 °C	38 °C	40.6 °C
39.5 °C	38.3 °C	39.3 °C
37.6 °C	38.2 °C	38.4 °C

Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 38.8 °C


35.5 °C	36.6 °C	38.8 °C
35.3 °C	37.6 °C	39.3 °C
35.3 °C	36 °C	38.3 °C

Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 37 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Xiaomi Mi 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.45 / 1.67 / 1.69 Watt
Load	4.07 / 8.54 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 5 3000 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh
Power Consumption		-15%	-14%	6%	-57%	-42%	-55%	-28%
Idle Minimum *	0.45	0.45 -0%	0.62 -38%	0.78 -73%	1 -122%	0.83 -84%	0.98 -118%	0.61 -36%
Idle Average *	1.67	1.68 -1%	1.43 14%	1.1 34%	2.41 -44%	2.1 -26%	2.27 -36%	1.77 -6%
Idle Maximum *	1.69	1.71 -1%	1.48 12%	1.16 31%	2.46 -46%	2.18 -29%	2.36 -40%	1.81 -7%
Load Average *	4.07	6.7 -65%	5.52 -36%	4.15 -2%	6.8 -67%	6.57 -61%	6.58 -62%	6.67 -64%
Load Maximum *	8.54	9.18 -7%	10.47 -23%	5.12 40%	8.9 -4%	9.32 -9%	10.12 -19%	10.98 -29%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		12h 19min

	Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 5 3000 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	739	504 -32%	692 -6%	719 -3%	546 -26%	966 31%	573 -22%	494 -33%

Pros

+ 出色的质感

+ 明亮，高对比度的IPS屏幕

+ 6GB内存

+ 64GB UFS闪存

+ 立体声扬声器

+ 非常优秀的系统性能

+ 快速无线模组

+ 准确的GPS模组

+ 高性能处理器和显卡

+ 蓝牙5.0

+ USB 3.0

+ 出色的电池续航

+ 价位

Cons

- 较高的重量（特别是陶瓷版）

- 双相机系统未达到高端水准

- 屏幕色彩和灰阶色差较高

- 仅防溅水

- 无SD卡扩展功能

- 应用和无线网络崩溃问题（MiUI测试版）

- 不支持LTE-20频段

- 屏幕闪烁

In review: Xiaomi Mi6. Test device provided by TradingShenzhen.

小米带来的全新高端智能手机是对Mi系列的一次成功更新。基于前代机型，这家中国生产商实现了一些进一步的优化。这台设备的屏幕，闪存，芯片组，连接性和电池续航都得到了改进。除此之外，由于尺寸没有增大它也依然适合单手握持使用。同时，Mi6还提供了接近听筒的第二个扬声器，支持立体声效果——这和我们在HTC 设备中看到的设计相似。它的相机依然是最大的弱点所在，尽管双相机的表现绝不算差，但仍然有改进空间。

当然它还有一些小瑕疵，比如IPS屏幕较高的灰度和色彩偏差，相对较高的机身重量，缺少三防功能，不支持Qi无线充电。它的内部存储也无法得到扩展。不过相比其他高端设备，小米带来了一台整体上十分吸引人的设备，特别是考虑到它400欧元（约450美元）的价位，在我们测试期间它的售价甚至低于这个数字。不过通过进口方式购买这款设备所伴随的限制和风险可能并不是所有用户都希望承担的。

很遗憾的是小米没有为Mi6设计一款支持LTE-20频段的国际机型。这将是这台今年的旗舰机型最大的实际缺陷——对于在德国和欧洲的用户来说。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Xiaomi Mi 6 - 2017-06-22 06/22/2017 v6^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

50 / 60 → 84%

Weight

91%

Battery

95%

Display

86%

Games Performance

66 / 63 → 100%

Application Performance

70 / 70 → 100%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 91 → 80%

Camera

78%

Average

81%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Mi6 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2017-07- 1 (Update: 2017-07- 1)

小米 Mi6 智能手机简短评测

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Mi 6 audio analysis

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare