Notebookcheck

小米 Mi6 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich (translated by Yuchen Wang), 07/01/2017
Smartphone Touchscreen Android

内行建议。 正在寻找一台强劲的高端智能手机的用户,可以考虑一下小米Mi6。售价约400欧元(约450美元)的这款小米旗舰机型提供了丰富的功能,遗憾的是没有支持LTE-20频段。从我们的测试结果来看,第六代的Mi机型在一个方面很难与其他高端机型对抗。

Xiaomi Mi 6
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.45 GHz
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 540
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
5.15 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 428 PPI, 电容式,多点触控, LCD, IPS, 1尼特超暗模式和最高600尼特亮度, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 无3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: 无存储扩展, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 位置感应器,霍尔感应器,指南针,气压计,距离感应器, OTG, Miracast, LED状态指示灯, 计步器
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 4G 频段: FDD LTE: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8; 3G 频段: WCDMA 850/1900/2100 MHz; 2G 频段: GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 145.2 x 70.5
Battery
3350 mAh, Quickcharge 3.0
Operating System
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 4轴光学防抖, 长焦镜头 - 广角镜头
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器,欧标转接器,USB数据线,USB-C到3.5毫米转接器, MiUi 8, 12 Months Warranty, SAR n. b., fanless
Weight
168 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Price
400 EUR

 

Xiaomi Mi 6
Xiaomi Mi 6
Xiaomi Mi 6
Xiaomi Mi 6

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
574 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼57% -43%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼57% -43%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼77%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼53% -31%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼48% -37%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s ∼40% -48%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
233 MBit/s ∼36% -53%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -56%
GPS Xiaomi Mi6
GPS Xiaomi Mi6
GPS Xiaomi Mi6
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
554
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
593
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 620 cd/m² Average: 586.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 620 cd/m²
Contrast: 2214:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Mi 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Xiaomi Mi 5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-12%
7%
22%
-11%
-15%
4%
-27%
Brightness
586
566
-3%
611
4%
564
-4%
445
-24%
556
-5%
514
-12%
430
-27%
Brightness Distribution
89
90
1%
89
0%
94
6%
88
-1%
86
-3%
91
2%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.28
0.51
-82%
0.23
18%
0.22
21%
0.43
-54%
0.3
-7%
Contrast
2214
1173
-47%
2809
27%
2136
-4%
1272
-43%
1803
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.8
3.5
27%
4.5
6%
2.7
44%
5.5
-15%
4.8
-0%
3.2
33%
7.1
-48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
3.5
34%
6
-13%
3.1
42%
7.6
-43%
4.5
15%
4
25%
6.8
-28%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.29 105%
2.27 106%
2.15 112%
2.2 109%
2.39 100%
2.27 106%
2.23 108%
CCT
7473 87%
6532 100%
7996 81%
6335 103%
7454 87%
7194 90%
7120 91%
7866 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5885 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).
AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
25.19 MB/s ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 5
13.61 MB/s ∼9% -46%
LG G6
16.58 MB/s ∼11% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8
15.25 MB/s ∼10% -39%
HTC U Ultra
13.7 MB/s ∼9% -46%
Huawei P10
152.31 MB/s ∼100% +505%
Honor 8 Pro
151.6 MB/s ∼100% +502%
OnePlus 3T
74.39 MB/s ∼49% +195%
HTC U11
79.97 MB/s ∼53% +217%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
143.49 MB/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 5
106.78 MB/s ∼62% -26%
LG G6
95.19 MB/s ∼55% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8
127.17 MB/s ∼73% -11%
HTC U Ultra
84.2 MB/s ∼49% -41%
Huawei P10
168.42 MB/s ∼97% +17%
Honor 8 Pro
166.4 MB/s ∼96% +16%
OnePlus 3T
123.57 MB/s ∼71% -14%
HTC U11
91.45 MB/s ∼53% -36%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
196.7 MB/s ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 5
159.29 MB/s ∼77% -19%
LG G6
122.85 MB/s ∼60% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8
193.23 MB/s ∼94% -2%
HTC U Ultra
164.7 MB/s ∼80% -16%
Huawei P10
189.83 MB/s ∼92% -3%
Honor 8 Pro
187.1 MB/s ∼91% -5%
OnePlus 3T
165.3 MB/s ∼80% -16%
HTC U11
206.41 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
728.2 MB/s ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 5
459.64 MB/s ∼58% -37%
LG G6
428.67 MB/s ∼54% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8
792.86 MB/s ∼100% +9%
HTC U Ultra
423.9 MB/s ∼53% -42%
Huawei P10
737.65 MB/s ∼93% +1%
Honor 8 Pro
737.8 MB/s ∼93% +1%
OnePlus 3T
436.43 MB/s ∼55% -40%
HTC U11
717.33 MB/s ∼90% -1%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
181909 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 5
116330 Points ∼51% -36%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% -6%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% -24%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% -23%
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points ∼64% -20%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼70% -12%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% -4%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
6714 Points ∼42%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼27% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼42% 0%
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points ∼39% -7%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼40% -4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
1938 Points ∼40%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼38% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼41% +3%
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points ∼38% -4%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼39% -2%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
6300 Points ∼23%
HTC U Ultra
3983 Points ∼14%
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼22%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1970 Points ∼35%
HTC U Ultra
1643 Points ∼29%
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼34%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
3007 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1955 Points ∼65% -35%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼82% -17%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼58% -41%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% -37%
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points ∼73% -26%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼57% -43%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼94% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
4072 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2829 Points ∼53% -31%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64% -15%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% -41%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% -41%
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points ∼32% -57%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% -41%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
3775 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2573 Points ∼66% -32%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼82% -15%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼57% -41%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% -40%
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points ∼47% -51%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% -41%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
2921 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1976 Points ∼66% -32%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼65% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼81% -16%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼55% -44%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼73% -25%
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points ∼63% -35%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼48% -50%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼94% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
6231 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4558 Points ∼59% -27%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼64% -21%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼49% -39%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% -55%
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points ∼24% -70%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% -47%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
4978 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3542 Points ∼71% -29%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼81% -19%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼59% -41%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% -47%
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points ∼37% -63%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼52% -48%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼95% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
20330 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 5
21483 Points ∼31% +6%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼32% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼31% +6%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼31% +5%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼22% -25%
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points ∼22% -26%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼32% +10%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼29% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
58228 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Mi 5
32613 Points ∼7% -44%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% -38%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% -43%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% -38%
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points ∼7% -45%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% -41%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
41172 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 5
29246 Points ∼15% -29%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼16% -23%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼15% -28%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% -33%
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points ∼13% -37%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% -25%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
119 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Mi 5
90 fps ∼7% -24%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼9% +2%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼6% -38%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% -42%
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps ∼3% -64%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% -24%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% -24%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
60 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Mi 5
60 fps ∼13% 0%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼13% 0%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% -23%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% -8%
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps ∼13% -2%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% -2%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -3%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
63 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps ∼8% -33%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11% -2%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% -59%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% -52%
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps ∼5% -54%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% -27%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -19%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps ∼12% -25%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼11% -27%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% -59%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% -43%
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps ∼5% -64%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12% -20%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -48%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
43 fps ∼10%
Xiaomi Mi 5
30 fps ∼7% -30%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼6% -44%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% -72%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% -44%
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps ∼5% -51%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% -26%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% -23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
42 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 5
31 fps ∼18% -26%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼13% -45%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% -71%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% -40%
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps ∼7% -69%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% -24%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -64%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼7%
Xiaomi Mi 5
19 fps ∼5% -27%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼7% -4%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% -42%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% -42%
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps ∼4% -42%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼6% -23%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7% -8%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼1%
Xiaomi Mi 5
18 fps ∼1% -31%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼0% -50%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% -68%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼0% -38%
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps ∼0% -58%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼1% -23%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼0% -50%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
7548 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 5
6873 Points ∼83% -9%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼69% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼73% -20%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼63% -31%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% -3%
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points ∼89% -3%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼68% -25%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼100% +10%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
733 Points ∼39%
LG G6
647 Points ∼35% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1276 Points ∼68% +74%
Huawei P10
664 Points ∼35% -9%
HTC U11
812 Points ∼43% +11%
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
38773 Points ∼88%
LG G6
35449 Points ∼80% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points ∼96% +9%
Huawei P10
37968 Points ∼86% -2%
HTC U11
38752 Points ∼88% 0%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
60.1 fps ∼99%
LG G6
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
59.8 fps ∼99% 0%
Huawei P10
60.5 fps ∼100% +1%
HTC U11
60 fps ∼99% 0%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
32.14 fps ∼88%
LG G6
24.34 fps ∼67% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps ∼84% -5%
Huawei P10
23.56 fps ∼64% -27%
HTC U11
36.58 fps ∼100% +14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
1263 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1106 Points ∼72% -12%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼70% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼75% -8%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼59% -28%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% -15%
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points ∼73% -10%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -29%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼79% -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
6206 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4522 Points ∼53% -27%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼71% -2%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼53% -26%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% -34%
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points ∼47% -34%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% -28%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼69% -4%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
4054 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1801 Points ∼41% -56%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% -25%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -61%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼63% -31%
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points ∼97% +6%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼44% -52%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% -49%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
5857 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3638 Points ∼55% -38%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼82% -8%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼43% -52%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% -35%
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points ∼61% -31%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -47%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼85% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
3694 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2392 Points ∼63% -35%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼86% -11%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% -44%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼69% -29%
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points ∼79% -19%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼59% -40%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% -18%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
3409 Points ∼100%
Huawei P10
1909 Points ∼56% -44%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
8356 Points ∼81%
Huawei P10
10073 Points ∼98% +21%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
15128 Points ∼25%
Huawei P10
14902 Points ∼25% -1%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
74793 Points ∼55%
Huawei P10
47087 Points ∼34% -37%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
266992 Points ∼98%
Huawei P10
271402 Points ∼100% +2%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
13267 Points ∼100%
Huawei P10
9242 Points ∼70% -30%
ANDEBench PRO
3D (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
94.8 fps ∼72%
Huawei P10
52.25 fps ∼40% -45%
HTC U11
102.9 fps ∼79% +9%
Platform (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
328.1 Points ∼5%
Huawei P10
601.3 Points ∼9% +83%
HTC U11
707.2 Points ∼10% +116%
Storage (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
10067 KB/s ∼10%
Huawei P10
32085 KB/s ∼31% +219%
HTC U11
102517 KB/s ∼100% +918%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
5013 KOps/s ∼62%
Huawei P10
6482 KOps/s ∼80% +29%
HTC U11
6072 KOps/s ∼75% +21%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
17196 MB/s ∼82%
Huawei P10
21024 MB/s ∼100% +22%
HTC U11
13891 MB/s ∼66% -19%
Device Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
17330 Points ∼66%
Huawei P10
19661 Points ∼75% +13%
HTC U11
26076 Points ∼100% +50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
2667.5 ms * ∼4%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2973.3 ms * ∼5% -11%
LG G6
2464.2 ms * ∼4% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1886.6 ms * ∼3% +29%
HTC U Ultra
4141 ms * ∼7% -55%
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼5% -17%
Honor 8 Pro
3156.7 ms * ∼5% -18%
OnePlus 3T
2719.3 ms * ∼5% -2%
HTC U11
2760.3 ms * ∼5% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
11909 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 5
8619 Points ∼17% -28%
LG G6
9113 Points ∼18% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8
12941 Points ∼26% +9%
HTC U Ultra
5511 Points ∼11% -54%
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼21% -14%
Honor 8 Pro
10016 Points ∼20% -16%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼20% -18%
HTC U11
11781 Points ∼24% -1%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
70.453 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 5
53.969 Points ∼16% -23%
LG G6
56.628 Points ∼17% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8
65.846 Points ∼20% -7%
HTC U Ultra
45.084 Points ∼14% -36%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼17% -18%
Honor 8 Pro
58.065 Points ∼17% -18%
OnePlus 3T
54.526 Points ∼16% -23%
HTC U11
69.51 Points ∼21% -1%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
Max. Load
 39.4 °C38 °C40.6 °C 
 39.5 °C38.3 °C39.3 °C 
 37.6 °C38.2 °C38.4 °C 
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 38.8 °C
35.5 °C36.6 °C38.8 °C
35.3 °C37.6 °C39.3 °C
35.3 °C36 °C38.3 °C
Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 37 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.639.12525.434.93125.332.14032.9325033.631.86331.630.48028.4281002723.912520.825.41602236.820021.344.825020.85231521.252.540019.456.550019.562.863017.766.380017.964.9100017.865.9125017.368.5160017.467.5200016.770250017.272315018.271.6400017.976.3500017.675630017.769.9800017.869.41000017.967.41250018.165.51600018.254.6SPL3082.3N1.352.8median 17.9Xiaomi Mi 6median 65.9Delta1.38.530.929.330.926.229.126.228.627.828.629.832.629.828.826.728.82628.8262424.92424.824.724.830.722.130.729.220.829.236.120.136.141.719.841.748.72148.753.321.753.357.420.557.462.62162.662.118.462.165.71765.767.717.367.766.915.266.970.315.570.371.21571.27314.97378.515.178.581.314.681.373.914.673.973.114.673.17214.6726014.66048.214.648.28628.88657.31.257.3median 62.6HTC U Ultramedian 17median 62.612.2312.231.635.225.433.125.329.932.92533.629.231.631.228.426.9272620.833.92243.521.349.920.854.821.257.519.462.319.566.417.767.317.96417.863.217.364.917.462.516.756.317.26018.26117.963.217.662.817.760.317.861.617.962.518.164.518.255.83075.61.336.8median 17.9Huawei P10 Plusmedian 61.61.34.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Xiaomi Mi 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.45 / 1.67 / 1.69 Watt
Load midlight 4.07 / 8.54 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Power Consumption
-15%
-14%
6%
-57%
-42%
-55%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.45
0.45
-0%
0.62
-38%
0.78
-73%
1
-122%
0.83
-84%
0.98
-118%
0.61
-36%
Idle Average *
1.67
1.68
-1%
1.43
14%
1.1
34%
2.41
-44%
2.1
-26%
2.27
-36%
1.77
-6%
Idle Maximum *
1.69
1.71
-1%
1.48
12%
1.16
31%
2.46
-46%
2.18
-29%
2.36
-40%
1.81
-7%
Load Average *
4.07
6.7
-65%
5.52
-36%
4.15
-2%
6.8
-67%
6.57
-61%
6.58
-62%
6.67
-64%
Load Maximum *
8.54
9.18
-7%
10.47
-23%
5.12
40%
8.9
-4%
9.32
-9%
10.12
-19%
10.98
-29%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3
12h 19min
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
739
504
-32%
692
-6%
719
-3%
546
-26%
966
31%
573
-22%
494
-33%

Pros

+ 出色的质感
+ 明亮,高对比度的IPS屏幕
+ 6GB内存
+ 64GB UFS闪存
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 非常优秀的系统性能
+ 快速无线模组
+ 准确的GPS模组
+ 高性能处理器和显卡
+ 蓝牙5.0
+ USB 3.0
+ 出色的电池续航
+ 价位

Cons

- 较高的重量(特别是陶瓷版)
- 双相机系统未达到高端水准
- 屏幕色彩和灰阶色差较高
- 仅防溅水
- 无SD卡扩展功能
- 应用和无线网络崩溃问题(MiUI测试版)
- 不支持LTE-20频段
- 屏幕闪烁
In review: Xiaomi Mi6. Test device provided by TradingShenzhen.
In review: Xiaomi Mi6. Test device provided by TradingShenzhen.

小米带来的全新高端智能手机是对Mi系列的一次成功更新。基于前代机型,这家中国生产商实现了一些进一步的优化。这台设备的屏幕,闪存,芯片组,连接性和电池续航都得到了改进。除此之外,由于尺寸没有增大它也依然适合单手握持使用。同时,Mi6还提供了接近听筒的第二个扬声器,支持立体声效果——这和我们在HTC 设备中看到的设计相似。它的相机依然是最大的弱点所在,尽管双相机的表现绝不算差,但仍然有改进空间。

当然它还有一些小瑕疵,比如IPS屏幕较高的灰度和色彩偏差,相对较高的机身重量,缺少三防功能,不支持Qi无线充电。它的内部存储也无法得到扩展。不过相比其他高端设备,小米带来了一台整体上十分吸引人的设备,特别是考虑到它400欧元(约450美元)的价位,在我们测试期间它的售价甚至低于这个数字。不过通过进口方式购买这款设备所伴随的限制和风险可能并不是所有用户都希望承担的。

很遗憾的是小米没有为Mi6设计一款支持LTE-20频段的国际机型。这将是这台今年的旗舰机型最大的实际缺陷——对于在德国和欧洲的用户来说。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Xiaomi Mi 6 - 06/22/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 60 → 84%
Weight
91%
Battery
95%
Display
86%
Games Performance
66 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
70 / 70 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
78%
Average
81%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 Mi6 智能手机简短评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-07- 1 (Update: 2017-07- 1)