联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7笔记本电脑回顾。Ryzen 5 6600HS满足良好的16:10显示屏

考虑到其近1000欧元(约998美元)的价格,测试的16ARH7型号对于所提供的性能来说并不是非常实惠。另一方面,这台16英寸的笔记本电脑拥有高质量和一流的显示屏。根据制造商的说法,这里使用的IPS屏幕提供350 cd/m²,120 Hz和100% sRGB。2,560 x 1,600像素的分辨率也没什么可嘲笑的。作为存储解决方案,使用了512GB的NVMe固态硬盘,而DDR5工作内存,不幸的是,它是焊接的,不能扩展,提供16GB。如前所述,对于处理器,联想已经决定采用相当罕见的 Ryzen 5 6600HS它使用了 Radeon 660M.
IdeaPad 5 Pro的竞争对手包括其他16英寸笔记本电脑,如 华为MateBook D16,以及Acer Swift 3 SF316-51,以及LG Gram 16,以及联想瑜伽7 16IAP7这些产品都使用不同的CPU,但它们的图形加速器是相当快的 Iris Xe G7有96个EUs。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.7 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
83.6 % | 07/2022 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.4 % | 10/2021 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % | 09/2021 | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.7 % | 08/2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
由于该机箱在很大程度上与已经测试过的5 Pro 16IHU6相同,带有 酷睿i5-11300H和 GeForce MX450,而且除了一个细节(USB-C 3.2 Gen2端口必须在没有雷电支持的情况下进行),连接也是类似的,我们不会在这里再次讨论机箱、连接设备和输入设备。你可以在这个 的评论中找到相应的信息。.
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 226, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1648, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (620 - 916, n=21) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (701 - 1740, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (624 - 982, n=22) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
网络摄像头

显示
16ARH7最大的亮点和购买理由之一是其出色的显示效果,在任何情况下都不会出现任何差错。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 415 cd/m²
Contrast: 1297:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.92 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 0.58
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.272
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AUO B160QAN02.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 2% | 25% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 66.2 2% | 66.6 2% | 95.8 47% | 67 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 98 | 96.4 -2% | 99.5 2% | 99.8 2% | 95.7 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 68.3 2% | 68.5 2% | 83.8 25% | 69.3 3% |
Response Times | -140% | -155% | -197% | -202% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14.1 ? | 30.5 ? -116% | 32 ? -127% | 44 ? -212% | 36 ? -155% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.1 ? | 18.7 ? -163% | 20 ? -182% | 20 ? -182% | 24.8 ? -249% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | ||||
Screen | -25% | 15% | -83% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 415 | 319 -23% | 304 -27% | 331 -20% | 393.7 -5% |
Brightness | 409 | 317 -22% | 284 -31% | 309 -24% | 367 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 88 -3% | 88 -3% | 84 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.23 28% | 0.165 48% | 0.22 31% | 0.38 -19% |
Contrast | 1297 | 1387 7% | 1842 42% | 1505 16% | 1036 -20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.92 | 3.4 -77% | 1.44 25% | 4.64 -142% | 1.97 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.71 | 8.1 -42% | 3.62 37% | 9.82 -72% | 5.46 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.58 | 0.8 -38% | 3.16 -445% | 0.62 -7% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 5.7 -54% | 2.6 30% | 6.9 -86% | 2.1 43% |
Gamma | 2.272 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.41 91% | 2.34 94% | 2.1 105% |
CCT | 7132 91% | 7433 87% | 6527 100% | 7904 82% | 6461 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68.5 | 75.1 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 | 100 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -55% /
-36% | -46% /
-14% | -85% /
-76% | -68% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.7 ms rise | |
↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
业绩
IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7的性能可以说是中档。六核处理器应该在未来几年提供足够的性能,就像16GB内存和NVMe SSD。正如预期的那样,这台16英寸设备在3D速度方面显示出一些弱点。
测试条件
处理器
Ryzen 5 6600HS是目前AMD的Rembrandt一代的六核型号,它试图以16MB L3缓存和高达4.5GHz的时钟速度来吸引客户。这款6纳米的芯片能够通过SMT在12个线程上并行工作。AMD规定TDP为35瓦,介于经典性能CPU(超过40瓦)和省电版本(低于30瓦)之间。在我们用Cinebench R15进行的循环测试中,6600HS取得了良好的数据。与许多其他笔记本电脑相比,速度保持非常稳定,这说明了冷却系统的作用。恒定的性能明显领先于 酷睿i7-1260P, 酷睿i7-1165G7, 和 酷睿i7-11370H.AMD芯片的性能更多的是在一个水平上。 酷睿i7-12700H.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (3127 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (819 - 2110, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 11768, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (316 - 812, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (570 - 4703, n=108, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (119 - 308, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 956, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Multimedia (11813 - 119900, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2898 - 7163, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3307 - 20053, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (843 - 2137, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.12 - 30.5, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 89.1, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.994, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (2677 - 27340, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (12762 - 136048, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (841 - 6681, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31314 - 134321, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (7417 - 68591, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 151546, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (228 - 1901, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Average of class Multimedia (1501 - 14155, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 52727, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
系统性能
根据PCMark 10,IdeaPad 5 Pro在系统性能方面排名第二,仅仅勉强落后于华为MateBook D16。这台电脑在主观上的反应也很舒适快速。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4039 - 8083, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8448 - 12144, n=84, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (5462 - 11186, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3861 - 11777, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (970 - 2146, n=79, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (921 - 2064, n=79, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (933 - 2865, n=79, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2234, n=79, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 Score | 5855 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 92447, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 79656, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=87, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 133.9, n=88, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
该存储解决方案提供了一个混合性能。虽然我们测量的性能值、连续读写时的速度等都很有说服力,但在用DiskSpd进行长期测试后,我们看到一些强烈的变化。然而,除非你对三星的512GB M.2固态硬盘(PM9A1型号)提出一些持续的苛刻要求,否则你不应该注意到这个问题。
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
由于16ARH7不提供专门的显卡,集成在处理器中的Radeon 660M必须处理所有的图形计算。正如3D测量结果所显示的,其性能与英特尔的一些Tiger Lake 和Alder Lake型号中集成的96 EUs的Iris Xe Graphics G7相似。然而,根据我们的经验,驱动支持将倾向于为AMD说话(关键词:游戏)。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average AMD Radeon 660M |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (1679 - 60250, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average AMD Radeon 660M (5314 - 7014, n=6) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (10124 - 150699, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average AMD Radeon 660M (21857 - 33949, n=6) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (1368 - 46022, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average AMD Radeon 660M (3447 - 4993, n=6) | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (373 - 17620, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average AMD Radeon 660M (1149 - 1588, n=6) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7360 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 169560 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24524 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike S |