联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7笔记本电脑回顾。Ryzen 5 6600HS满足良好的16:10显示屏

Name: Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7
Brand: Lenovo

值得推荐的16英寸屏幕。 通过IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7，联想创造了一个非常令人兴奋的整体包装。直到现在，我们的测试中还没有一个集成Radeon 660M的Ryzen 5 6600HS。此外，还有一个明亮的16:10显示屏，具有高sRGB覆盖率。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/21/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

考虑到其近1000欧元（约998美元）的价格，测试的16ARH7型号对于所提供的性能来说并不是非常实惠。另一方面，这台16英寸的笔记本电脑拥有高质量和一流的显示屏。根据制造商的说法，这里使用的IPS屏幕提供350 cd/m²，120 Hz和100% sRGB。2,560 x 1,600像素的分辨率也没什么可嘲笑的。作为存储解决方案，使用了512GB的NVMe固态硬盘，而DDR5工作内存，不幸的是，它是焊接的，不能扩展，提供16GB。如前所述，对于处理器，联想已经决定采用相当罕见的 Ryzen 5 6600HS它使用了 Radeon 660M.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 (IdeaPad 5 Pro Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS 6 x 3.3 - 4.5 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 42 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 660M - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1900 MHz, Memory: 1067 MHz, LPDDR5, Adrenalin 21.40.28.03

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5-6400 onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AUO B160QAN02.H, IPS, WQXGA, glossy: no, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB

, NVMe SSD

Soundcard

Realtek ALC257 @ AMD K19.4 - Audio Processor

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio port, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC

Networking

Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.4 x 356 x 251

Battery

75 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD 1080p

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0 Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100 Watt power supply, Lenovo Vantage, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.944 kg, Power Supply: 263 g

Price

1000 EUR

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

IdeaPad 5 Pro的竞争对手包括其他16英寸笔记本电脑，如华为MateBook D16，以及Acer Swift 3 SF316-51，以及LG Gram 16，以及联想瑜伽7 16IAP7这些产品都使用不同的CPU，但它们的图形加速器是相当快的 Iris Xe G7有96个EUs。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.7 %	09/2022	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	1.9 kg	18.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
83.6 %	07/2022	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.7 kg	18.4 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.4 %	10/2021	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.7 kg	15.9 mm	16.10"	1920x1080
86.3 %	09/2021	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.7 %	08/2022	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2 kg	19.2 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

由于该机箱在很大程度上与已经测试过的5 Pro 16IHU6相同，带有酷睿i5-11300H和 GeForce MX450，而且除了一个细节（USB-C 3.2 Gen2端口必须在没有雷电支持的情况下进行），连接也是类似的，我们不会在这里再次讨论机箱、连接设备和输入设备。你可以在这个的评论中找到相应的信息。.

尺寸比较

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 LG Gram 16 (2021) DIN A4 ❌

SD卡阅读器

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)	93.3 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84.7 MB/s +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	79 MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	78.6 MB/s -1%

沟通

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1372 (1168^min - 1507^max) MBit/s +73%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1735, n=76, last 2 years)	1327 MBit/s +67%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Realtek RTL8852BE	795 (722^min - 860^max) MBit/s
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 925, n=35)	786 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1576 (1376^min - 1661^max) MBit/s +102%
Average of class Multimedia (701 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)	1416 MBit/s +81%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 984, n=36)	833 MBit/s +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Realtek RTL8852BE	782 (543^min - 958^max) MBit/s

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (722-860)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1372 (1168-1507)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø781 (543-958)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1376-1661)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7: 21.83 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 30.13 ∆E

显示

16ARH7最大的亮点和购买理由之一是其出色的显示效果，在任何情况下都不会出现任何差错。


423 cd/m²	392 cd/m²	406 cd/m²
424 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	426 cd/m²
405 cd/m²	389 cd/m²	404 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO B160QAN02.H tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 426 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 409.3 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 415 cd/m²
Contrast: 1297:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.58
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.272

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AUO B160QAN02.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10	LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display		1%	2%	25%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	65	66.2 2%	66.6 2%	95.8 47%	67 3%
sRGB Coverage	98	96.4 -2%	99.5 2%	99.8 2%	95.7 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.2	68.3 2%	68.5 2%	83.8 25%	69.3 3%
Response Times		-140%	-155%	-197%	-202%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.1 ?(6.7, 7.4)	30.5 ?(14.2, 16.3) -116%	32 ?(15, 17) -127%	44 ?(19, 25) -212%	36 ?(18, 18) -155%
Response Time Black / White *	7.1 ?(3, 4.1)	18.7 ?(9.7, 9) -163%	20 ?(11, 9) -182%	20 ?(8, 12) -182%	24.8 ?(12.4, 12.4) -249%
PWM Frequency			2500 ?(10)
Screen		-25%	15%	-83%	-3%
Brightness middle	415	319 -23%	304 -27%	331 -20%	393.7 -5%
Brightness	409	317 -22%	284 -31%	309 -24%	367 -10%
Brightness Distribution	91	90 -1%	88 -3%	88 -3%	84 -8%
Black Level *	0.32	0.23 28%	0.165 48%	0.22 31%	0.38 -19%
Contrast	1297	1387 7%	1842 42%	1505 16%	1036 -20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.92	3.4 -77%	1.44 25%	4.64 -142%	1.97 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.71	8.1 -42%	3.62 37%	9.82 -72%	5.46 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.58	0.8 -38%		3.16 -445%	0.62 -7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	5.7 -54%	2.6 30%	6.9 -86%	2.1 43%
Gamma	2.272 ^97%	2.1 ^105%	2.41 ^91%	2.34 ^94%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	7132 ^91%	7433 ^87%	6527 ^100%	7904 ^82%	6461 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			68.5	75.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			99.5	100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-55% / -36%	-46% / -14%	-85% / -76%	-68% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

16英寸显示屏采用16:10格式，由于其2560 x 1600像素的相当高的分辨率，可以提供相当清晰的图像。100%的sRGB覆盖率也是可敬的，但所有的竞争对手在这里都达到了同样的效果。然而，在响应时间方面，没有一个竞争对手能够跟上IdeaPad 5的步伐。大约7毫秒的黑色到白色和14毫秒的灰色到灰色是其他游戏笔记本电脑中比较有名的。这并不奇怪，因为联想为这台16英寸的笔记本电脑配备了120-Hz的面板。

在亮度方面，IdeaPad也位居前列。平均409cd/m²的亮度是一个非常好的价值，也允许在户外使用它。视角是IPS的典型水平，所以也很宽松。

联想在高色彩准确性方面也值得称赞。在交付状态下，该显示器已经产生了非常自然的色彩，甚至可以通过校准进一步提高。0.32cd/m²的黑值和1,297:1的对比度也让人没有理由抱怨，即使它不足以成为这里的第一名。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
7.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.7 ms rise
14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

业绩

IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7的性能可以说是中档。六核处理器应该在未来几年提供足够的性能，就像16GB内存和NVMe SSD。正如预期的那样，这台16英寸设备在3D速度方面显示出一些弱点。

测试条件

预装的联想Vantage软件提供了大量的选项，可以根据你的个人喜好调整系统。在这方面特别相关的是 "电源和性能 "项目，它包括三个配置文件（见屏幕截图）。我们所有的测量都是使用 "智能冷却 "模式，并勾选 "自动切换到高性能模式 "的选项。这应该是为了让系统在高要求的任务中发挥其全部性能，而在简单的任务中，如办公、视频或网络杂务，不会出现不必要的噪音或消耗过多的电力。

处理器

Ryzen 5 6600HS是目前AMD的Rembrandt一代的六核型号，它试图以16MB L3缓存和高达4.5GHz的时钟速度来吸引客户。这款6纳米的芯片能够通过SMT在12个线程上并行工作。AMD规定TDP为35瓦，介于经典性能CPU（超过40瓦）和省电版本（低于30瓦）之间。在我们用Cinebench R15进行的循环测试中，6600HS取得了良好的数据。与许多其他笔记本电脑相比，速度保持非常稳定，这说明了冷却系统的作用。恒定的性能明显领先于酷睿i7-1260P, 酷睿i7-1165G7, 和酷睿i7-11370H.AMD芯片的性能更多的是在一个水平上。酷睿i7-12700H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS: Ø1618 (1598.91-1656.18)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø1777 (1730.55-2218.28)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1672 (1578.91-2216.93)

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø926 (914.45-1017.58)

LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø596 (474.78-805.25)

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1260 (1158.65-1837.9)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	85.9 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	83.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	76.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	66.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	66.9 pt
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	58.3 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	46.9 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)	14189 Points +55%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	11202 Points +23%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	10648 (7494.09^min - 10648^max) Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	9131 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	9131 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	6182 Points -32%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	4652 Points -49%
Single Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	1784 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	1736 Points +18%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)	1713 Points +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	1556 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	1465 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	1465 Points 0%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1311 Points -11%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)	5352 Points +36%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	4248 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	4056 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	3935 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	3935 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	2299 Points -42%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1847 Points -53%
CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	672 Points +16%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)	646 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	645 Points +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	601 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	577 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	577 Points 0%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	518 Points -10%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)	2321 Points +40%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	2218 (1730.6^min - 2218^max) Points +34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	2217 (1578.91^min - 2216.93^max) Points +34%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	1838 (1158.65^min - 1837.9^max) Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	1656 (1598.91^min - 1656.18^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	1656 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	1018 (914.45^min - 1017.58^max) Points -39%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	805 Points -51%
CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)	251 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	244 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	235 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	235 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	232 Points -1%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	205 Points -13%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	771 Seconds * -135%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	507 Seconds * -55%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	343 Seconds * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	328 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	328 Seconds * -0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	286 Seconds * +13%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)	265 Seconds * +19%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)	57411 MIPS +29%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	50976 MIPS +15%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	44499 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	44476 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	44476 MIPS 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	27015 MIPS -39%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	22300 MIPS -50%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	5716 MIPS +7%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)	5639 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	5516 MIPS +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	5393 MIPS +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	5318 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	5318 MIPS 0%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5113 MIPS -4%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)	11372 Points +58%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	11321 Points +57%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	10452 Points +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	7195 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	7195 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	6115 Points -15%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5163 Points -28%
Single-Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	1777 Points +19%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)	1758 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	1744 Points +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	1607 Points +8%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1500 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	1493 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	1493 Points 0%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)	15.6 fps +30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	13.8 fps +15%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	12.5 fps +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	12 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	12 fps 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	7.7 fps -36%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5.63 fps -53%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	65.3 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	65.3 s * -0%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)	48 s * +26%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	47.9 s * +27%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	45.9 s * +30%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	41.1 s * +37%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	36.4 s * +44%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.625 sec * -18%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	0.548 sec * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	0.53 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	0.53 sec * -0%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)	0.4811 sec * +9%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P	0.4612 sec * +13%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4509 sec * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6157

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

34414

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

19 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.74 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1656 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

118 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

235 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia	92.7 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	86.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	81.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS	81.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66.9 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)	12788 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	11862 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	11862 KRay/s 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11042 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7948 KRay/s -33%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4894 KRay/s -59%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	73047 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	73047 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)	65480 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	56156 Points -23%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	43394 Points -41%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23249 Points -68%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)	3047 MB/s +26%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2693 MB/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	2421 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	2421 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2155 MB/s -11%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1573 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	97156 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)	92085 Points +19%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	79538 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	77275 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	77275 Points 0%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50442 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	9140 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	9140 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)	9055 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7567 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5748 Points -37%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4038 Points -56%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	39992 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	39992 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)	33558 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	27706 Points -31%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	21407 Points -46%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	14077 Points -65%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	99760 MB/s +153%
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)	76070 MB/s +93%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58344 MB/s +48%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44573 MB/s +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	39487 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	39487 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)	868 MB/s +38%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	721 MB/s +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	631 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	631 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	621 MB/s -2%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	287 MB/s -55%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)	6829 KRay/s +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	6223 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	6223 KRay/s 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5951 KRay/s -4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4339 KRay/s -30%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2579 KRay/s -59%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44296 MPixel/s +64%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	43652 MPixel/s +61%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38728 MPixel/s +43%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)	36824 MPixel/s +36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	27081 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	27081 MPixel/s 0%

系统性能

根据PCMark 10，IdeaPad 5 Pro在系统性能方面排名第二，仅仅勉强落后于华为MateBook D16。这台电脑在主观上的反应也很舒适快速。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)	6602 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	6041 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5855 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	5830 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	5459 Points -7%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4917 Points -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	11644 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	11251 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)	10473 Points +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	10241 Points +1%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	10149 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10090 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	8822 Points
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)	8709 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	7558 Points -14%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	7388 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	6932 Points -21%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	6888 Points -22%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)	8686 Points +42%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	6897 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	6800 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6121 Points
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	5838 Points -5%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4616 Points -25%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1864 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years)	1701 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	1684 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1790 Points
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)	1622 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	1600 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1959 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years)	1893 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	1872 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1812 Points
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)	1462 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	1427 Points

PCMark 10 Score		5855 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66400 MB/s +28%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64091 MB/s +24%
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)	61455 MB/s +19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58627 MB/s +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	51793 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	51793 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66708 MB/s +47%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62442 MB/s +38%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)	60555 MB/s +34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57124 MB/s +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	45229 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	45229 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	91272 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	91272 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66479 MB/s -27%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)	63628 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59311 MB/s -35%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58689 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	117.6 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS ()	117.6 ns * -0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	109.5 ns * +7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	104.5 ns * +11%
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)	102.3 ns * +13%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	92.6 ns * +21%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

这台16英寸笔记本电脑在延迟方面暴露出一些小的弱点。根据LatencyMon工具，这台笔记本电脑--像它的许多竞争对手一样--并不理想地适合实时处理音频和视频。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	824.9 μs * -18%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	803.5 μs * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	700.3 μs *
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	435.4 μs * +38%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	420.3 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

该存储解决方案提供了一个混合性能。虽然我们测量的性能值、连续读写时的速度等都很有说服力，但在用DiskSpd进行长期测试后，我们看到一些强烈的变化。然而，除非你对三星的512GB M.2固态硬盘（PM9A1型号）提出一些持续的苛刻要求，否则你不应该注意到这个问题。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6711 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4984 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 365.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 292.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3454 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2769 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 66.19 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 126.8 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	90.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	78 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	74.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	70.4 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	67.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	55.7 pt
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	46.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1472 - 4572, n=39)	3501 MB/s +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3304 (3226.68^min - 3303.54^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)	2872 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	2086 (2067.43^min - 2086.04^max) MB/s -37%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2012 (2006.14^min - 2011.76^max) MB/s -39%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1730 (1725.12^min - 1730.26^max) MB/s -48%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	915 (911^min - 915.46^max) MB/s -72%
seq write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1148 - 4434, n=39)	3289 MB/s +20%
Average of class Multimedia (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)	2977 MB/s +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2744 (2673.45^min - 2744.12^max) MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2489 (1082.97^min - 2488.9^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	2439 (2306.66^min - 2438.93^max) MB/s -11%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1438 (1113.25^min - 1437.81^max) MB/s -48%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	886 (874.58^min - 886.14^max) MB/s -68%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6708 (6289.36^min - 6707.53^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (3387 - 6793, n=39)	6077 MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)	5217 MB/s -22%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	3445 (3030.59^min - 3444.78^max) MB/s -49%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	2996 (2553.28^min - 2996.08^max) MB/s -55%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2883 (2661.83^min - 2882.85^max) MB/s -57%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	989 (886.37^min - 989.44^max) MB/s -85%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4857 (4816.12^min - 4857.21^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1146 - 5091, n=39)	4428 MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)	3947 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	3110 (3096.65^min - 3109.94^max) MB/s -36%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2496 (2283.43^min - 2496.07^max) MB/s -49%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1911 (1287.86^min - 1911.3^max) MB/s -61%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	887 (882.81^min - 887.42^max) MB/s -82%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (37.6 - 92.9, n=39)	71.9 MB/s +13%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)	64.5 MB/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	63.4 (62.32^min - 63.43^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	57.1 (55.75^min - 57.09^max) MB/s -10%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	54.3 (54.16^min - 54.32^max) MB/s -14%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	53.3 (52.75^min - 53.25^max) MB/s -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	43.1 (42.42^min - 43.05^max) MB/s -32%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	273 (267.01^min - 272.55^max) MB/s +117%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	208 (205.9^min - 208.09^max) MB/s +65%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (125.7 - 241, n=39)	180.3 MB/s +43%
Average of class Multimedia (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)	178.7 MB/s +42%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	178 (175.48^min - 177.72^max) MB/s +42%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	169.5 (166.2^min - 169.54^max) MB/s +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	125.7 (123.79^min - 125.73^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2139 (1104.16^min - 2139.02^max) MB/s +160%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (477 - 3426, n=39)	2058 MB/s +150%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1391 (1387.88^min - 1390.66^max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Multimedia (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)	1350 MB/s +64%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	824 (773.56^min - 823.76^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	727 (678.66^min - 726.52^max) MB/s -12%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	428 (425.72^min - 427.51^max) MB/s -48%
4k q32 t16 write
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1641 (1097.57^min - 1640.78^max) MB/s +449%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (253 - 3567, n=39)	1535 MB/s +413%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1241 (928.82^min - 1240.76^max) MB/s +315%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)	1067 MB/s +257%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	592 (162.65^min - 592.1^max) MB/s +98%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	366 (310.36^min - 366.25^max) MB/s +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	299 (286.49^min - 298.92^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (3573 - 8620, n=38)	5933 Points +40%
Average of class Multimedia (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)	5067 Points +19%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4934 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4247 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	4039 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	3822 Points -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2644 Points -38%
Score Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1079 - 3224, n=38)	2099 Points +55%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1915 Points +41%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)	1695 Points +25%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1477 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1357 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	1090 Points -20%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	865 Points -36%
Score Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1258 - 4036, n=38)	2819 Points +24%
Average of class Multimedia (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)	2567 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2279 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	2209 Points -3%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2060 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1839 Points -19%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1358 Points -40%
Seq Read
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4687.88 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (2629 - 5546, n=38)	4658 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)	4005 MB/s -15%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2808 MB/s -40%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2802 MB/s -40%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	2730.33 MB/s -42%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2015 MB/s -57%
Seq Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1108 - 3925, n=38)	2766 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2697.07 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)	2553 MB/s -5%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2345 MB/s -13%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1879 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	1708.72 MB/s -37%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1055 MB/s -61%
4K Read
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	73.9 MB/s +21%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (39.2 - 85.1, n=38)	67.8 MB/s +11%
Average of class Multimedia (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)	62.7 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	61.12 MB/s
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	61.03 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	58.52 MB/s -4%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	50.2 MB/s -18%
4K Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	248.56 MB/s +98%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	223.2 MB/s +78%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	215.46 MB/s +71%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)	188.5 MB/s +50%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (105.4 - 216, n=38)	174.9 MB/s +39%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	138.6 MB/s +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	125.7 MB/s
4K-64 Read
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1584 MB/s +91%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (533 - 2783, n=38)	1566 MB/s +89%
Average of class Multimedia (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)	1231 MB/s +49%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1135.53 MB/s +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	827.56 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	758.75 MB/s -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	589 MB/s -29%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1010 - 3480, n=38)	2393 MB/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)	2123 MB/s +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1884.06 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	1822.41 MB/s -3%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1687 MB/s -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1402.68 MB/s -26%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1029 MB/s -45%
Access Time Read
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.073 ms *
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	0.063 ms * +14%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)	0.0578 ms * +21%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	0.056 ms * +23%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (0.023 - 0.089, n=37)	0.048 ms * +34%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	0.035 ms * +52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	0.025 ms * +66%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK	0.396 ms * -890%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)	0.05992 ms * -50%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.04 ms *
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	0.039 ms * +2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (0.02 - 0.076, n=38)	0.03368 ms * +16%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	0.028 ms * +30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	0.016 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7: Ø6024 (3280.52-6727.42)

图形卡

由于16ARH7不提供专门的显卡，集成在处理器中的Radeon 660M必须处理所有的图形计算。正如3D测量结果所显示的，其性能与英特尔的一些Tiger Lake 和Alder Lake型号中集成的96 EUs的Iris Xe Graphics G7相似。然而，根据我们的经验，驱动支持将倾向于为AMD说话（关键词：游戏）。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41.8 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Radeon 660M	39.8 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	39 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37 pt
Average AMD Radeon 660M	36.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)	18929 Points +175%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	6944 Points +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	6904 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Radeon 660M	6883 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	6813 Points -1%
Average AMD Radeon 660M (5314 - 7014, n=6)	6358 Points -8%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	6305 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 150699, n=60, last 2 years)	58293 Points +74%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Radeon 660M	33433 Points
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33402 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30101 Points -10%
Average AMD Radeon 660M (21857 - 33949, n=6)	29610 Points -11%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29609 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27125 Points -19%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)	14005 Points +180%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	5771 Points +16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	5710 Points +14%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	5654 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Radeon 660M	4993 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	4961 Points -1%
Average AMD Radeon 660M (3447 - 4993, n=6)	4550 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)	5310 Points +236%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	1747 Points +11%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	1717 Points +9%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	1664 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	1601 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Radeon 660M	1580 Points
Average AMD Radeon 660M (1149 - 1588, n=6)	1466 Points -7%

3DMark 11 Performance		7360 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		169560 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		24524 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4664 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1776 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

Radeon 660M不能被视为游戏显卡的事实不应该令人惊讶。即使将分辨率从原生的2,560 x 1,600像素降低到全高清，即1,920 x 1,080，许多现代游戏在最低细节设置下也会出现卡顿（例如。战争之神, Elex 2, 和毁灭之光2).要想获得半点流畅的图像，你必须降低分辨率，或者将自己限制在较老的或计算强度较低的游戏中。这样你就可以在中高细节设置下玩这些游戏（例如。Dota 2, 星球大战中队, 和 GRID Legends).

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=92, last 2 years)	93.9 fps +228%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H	35 fps +22%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	33.3 fps +16%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P	29.1 (26^min) fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS	28.6 (25^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 660M (18.5 - 28.6, n=6)	24 fps -16%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	16.7 (6.22^min, 6.26^P0.1, 6.88^P1) fps -42%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps +231%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	17 fps +11%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	15.6 (7.78^min, 7.8^P0.1, 8.11^P1) fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS	15.3 (12^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 660M (12.3 - 17.9, n=6)	15.1 fps -1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H	14 (13^min, 13^P1) fps -8%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P	13.7 (12^min) fps -10%

与CPU的性能相比，GPU的性能在较长的时间内并不稳定。在我们60分钟的测试中，用的测试中，我们看到了一些帧率的变化。Witcher 3(FHD/Ultra)，我们看到了一些帧率的变化，你可以在下面的图表中看到。另一方面，LG Gram 16不得不在更强大和更频繁的性能跳跃中挣扎。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M: Ø18.2 (14-20)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14 (13-15)

LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø15.5 (8-20)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	133.9	118.5	40	17.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	93.2	58.5	28.6	15.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	114.5	98.5	65.8	55.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	53.4	23.8	16.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	49.2	37.4	33.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	63	30	26
Strange Brigade (2018)	114.4	43.3	33.9	28.6
Hunt Showdown (2020)	70.8	24.2	19.2
Doom Eternal (2020)	86.9	36.2	34.2
Gears Tactics (2020)	132	47.4	28.5
Death Stranding (2020)	58.1	30.6	29.1
Crysis Remastered (2020)	88.1	39.2	10.9
Serious Sam 4 (2020)	113	29.2	24.1
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)	48.2	20.7	19.1
Star Wars Squadrons (2020)	170.4	66.6	57.4
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	49	26	22
Dirt 5 (2020)	68.6	24.2	17.8
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	52	26	19
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)	64.7	21.2	21.1
Hitman 3 (2021)	91.1	34.5	30.5
Outriders (2021)	35.3	30.4	27.9
Resident Evil Village (2021)	75.3	33.4	29.9
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)	70			38.9
Days Gone (2021)	50	25.3	22.2
Deathloop (2021)	45.5	23.3	18.1
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)	53.6	32.7	26.4
Far Cry 6 (2021)	50	21	18
Back 4 Blood (2021)	104.3	40.4	34.3
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	0 game wont start	0 game wont start	0 game wont start
Riders Republic (2021)	56	30	23
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	92	39	32
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)	102	57.1	38.9
Halo Infinite (2021)	39.6	20.3	17.1
God of War (2022)	21.7	17.5	12.6
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	45	35	30
Dying Light 2 (2022)	19.7	15.4	12.4
GRID Legends (2022)	71	53.4	40.4
Elden Ring (2022)	39.6	29.9	26.9
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	27	24	15
Elex 2 (2022)	22.5	19.3	15.8
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	25.9	24	23.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	34.2	27	17.6
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)	0 game wont start (crash)
F1 22 (2022)	48	42	28
The Quarry (2022)	24.5	18	14.4

排放

噪声排放

IdeaPad 5 Pro在较长的时间内保持非常安静。在空闲运行期间，风扇经常保持关闭状态。当它们打开时，水平相当低，为26至28 dB(A)，这几乎不会使任何人感到不安。在负载情况下，这台16英寸笔记本电脑也相当安静，在《Witcher 3 》和压力测试期间，我们只测量到来自该设备的35分贝（A）。另一方面，在3DMark 06基准测试中，噪音水平有点令人吃惊，风扇转速达到44 dB(A)，对应的噪音水平明显更明显。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 26 / 28 dB(A)
Load		44 / 35 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Noise		-3%	1%	7%	3%
off / environment *	25	24.2 3%	26 -4%	26 -4%	23.6 6%
Idle Minimum *	25	24.2 3%	26 -4%	26 -4%	23.6 6%
Idle Average *	26	25.8 1%	26 -0%	26 -0%	23.6 9%
Idle Maximum *	28	30.5 -9%	27.7 1%	26 7%	23.6 16%
Load Average *	44	39.8 10%	32.7 26%	30.8 30%	37.7 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	35	39.8 -14%			40 -14%
Load Maximum *	35	39.8 -14%	39 -11%	31.1 11%	40.2 -15%

* ... smaller is better

温度

温度发展与竞争对手相似。机箱顶部的最高温度为46 °C（115 °F），底部的最高温度为48 °C（118 °F），既不是特别高也不是特别低。在空闲运行时，整个机箱的温度保持在30 °C (86 °F)以上，因此它非常适合舒适的写作或网上冲浪。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46 °C	44 °C	43 °C
42 °C	43 °C	38 °C
33 °C	36 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 39.4 °C


45 °C	48 °C	46 °C
41 °C	47 °C	37 °C
34 °C	35 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 40.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


26 °C	27 °C	25 °C
27 °C	28 °C	25 °C
26 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 28 °C
Average: 26 °C


26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	26 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Average: 25.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39 °C	38 °C	38 °C
37 °C	38 °C	33 °C
30 °C	31 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 34.6 °C


39 °C	40 °C	39 °C
37 °C	41 °C	33 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 35.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.2 °C / -13 F).

	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Heat		-1%	-3%	5%	22%
Maximum Upper Side *	46	41.8 9%	40 13%	46.9 -2%	39 15%
Maximum Bottom *	48	47.3 1%	47 2%	45.1 6%	34.2 29%
Idle Upper Side *	28	28.3 -1%	30.1 -8%	26.4 6%	21.2 24%
Idle Bottom *	27	30.2 -12%	31.6 -17%	24.1 11%	21.6 20%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

虽然Radeon 660M在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中以1900 MHz的最高速度运行，但在Furmark和Prime95工具的全负荷下，其时钟速度达到了约1060 MHz。同时，Ryzen 5 6600HS达到了约3.0 GHz，而不是3.4 GHz，这对于一个较长的压力情况来说是一个坚实的结果。

演讲者

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

消耗功率

耗电量也不明显。就所提供的性能而言，在空闲运行时4至13瓦，在负载下43至88瓦是可以的。附带的、令人愉快的、紧凑而轻巧的100瓦电源的尺寸是足够的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / Watt
Idle	4 / 7 / 13 Watt
Load	61 / 88 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-20%	18%	16%	-11%	-46%
Idle Minimum *	4	6.1 -53%	4.8 -20%	3.8 5%	6.6 -65%	7.29 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=96, last 2 years) -82%
Idle Average *	7	10.6 -51%	7.4 -6%	9 -29%	8.3 -19%	11.8 ?(4.6 - 43, n=96, last 2 years) -69%
Idle Maximum *	13	11.5 12%	9 31%	11.3 13%	9.8 25%	14.6 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=96, last 2 years) -12%
Load Average *	61	65.5 -7%	34.9 43%	35.2 42%	66 -8%	77.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=95, last 2 years) -27%
Witcher 3 ultra *	42.8	61.2 -43%	34.9 18%		52 -21%
Load Maximum *	88	68.4 22%	51.4 42%	43.5 51%	67.1 24%	121 ?(47.7 - 247, n=95, last 2 years) -38%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø42.8 (41.7-54)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø62.7 (38.5-89.4)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø58.3 (57.1-75.7)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø77.7 (74.6-79.5)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø40.1 (39.2-52.4)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø38.4 (31.8-75.7)

电池寿命

除了显示质量外，IdeaPad 5 Pro的另一个优势在于电池寿命。在我们的标准化WLAN测试中，亮度降低到150cd/m²，75瓦的电池（竞争对手：56至80瓦）持续了近10小时。因此，长时间的旅行不应该给笔记本电脑带来任何问题。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

9h 48min

	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M, 75 Wh	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-28%	-1%	60%	-19%	-3%
WiFi v1.3	588	424 -28%	585 -1%	943 60%	475 -19%	572 ?(274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years) -3%
Reader / Idle			1205	1713	734	933 ?(506 - 1571, n=25, last 2 years)
H.264			615	1204		710 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra			130			81.8 ?(57 - 104, n=5, last 2 years)
Load			103	258	113	97.7 ?(39 - 215, n=76, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 明亮的16:10显示屏

+ 坚固的金属外壳

+ 良好的输入设备

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 焊接的RAM不能扩展

- 平庸的WLAN性能

- 微弱的网络摄像头

判决书

IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7是一款成功的全能型产品，除了3D应用之外，它总是能达到良好或非常好的效果。

这要从优雅的金属外壳说起，它不是特别轻，但相当坚固，给人以高质量的印象。输入设备也比许多竞争对手的好。键盘和触摸板都很有吸引力和舒适。此外，Ryzen 5 6600HS的性能 Ryzen 5 6600HS很容易跟上英特尔竞争对手的步伐。

充足的电池寿命和明亮的16:10屏幕也赢得了额外的积极分数，它还具有高色彩准确性、短响应和清晰的图像显示（2,560 x 1,600像素）。

简而言之，那些正在寻找一个具有良好显示效果的多功能和移动的16英寸笔记本电脑的人在这里完全是正确的地址。

价格和可用性

例如，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7可从亚马逊购买，价格为1169美元.

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 - 2022-09-20 09/20/2022 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

85%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

62 / 80 → 78%

Weight

64 / 20-72 → 84%

Battery

88 / 95 → 93%

Display

91%

Games Performance

66 / 90 → 73%

Application Performance

95 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

88%

Noise

89 / 95 → 93%

Audio

74%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Average

78%

86%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7笔记本电脑回顾。Ryzen 5 6600HS满足良好的16:10显示屏

Florian Glaser, 2022-09-21 (Update: 2022-09-21)

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7笔记本电脑回顾。Ryzen 5 6600HS满足良好的16:10显示屏

潜在的竞争对手比较

尺寸比较

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

显示

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

业绩

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

演讲者

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 audio analysis

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 audio analysis

电源管理

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决书

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare