Notebookcheck Logo

Honor X8评测 - 经济实惠的中档智能手机,配备64MP摄像头

储蓄包。 Honor X8以一个大的液晶屏幕、大量的存储空间和一个以高分辨率64MP传感器为核心的四摄像头来展现自己。然而,我们在测试中也注意到了一些小的隐患。我们将找出它们是什么,以及X8是否仍然值得购买。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Honor X8 (X Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.70 inch 19.9:9, 2388 x 1080 pixel 391 PPI, Capacitive, TFT-LCD, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 97.83 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.45 x 163.4 x 74.7
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8) + 5 MPix (f/2.2) + 2 MPix (f/2.4) + 2 MPix (f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, Magic UI 4.2, 24 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0.84 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.24 W/kg; DRM Widevine L3, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1), fanless
Weight
177 g, Power Supply: 70 g
Price
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.5 %
07/2022
Honor X8
SD 680, Adreno 610
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2388x1080
79 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"2400x1080
76.5 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
195 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.8 %
04/2022
realme 9i
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2412x1080

外壳和功能 -Honor X8,有音频插孔,但没有microSD插槽

Honor X8以吸引人的直截了当的设计而令人信服,有黑色、银色和蓝色可供选择。制造质量很好,以紧密和均匀的缝隙令人信服;即使用力按压显示屏,也几乎看不到任何波纹。

显示屏与表面的比例(89%)确实不错,只是下巴一侧的边框有点厚。虽然Honor ,但没有声明对灰尘和水的渗透有特殊保护,SIM卡托盘有一个小的橡胶密封。

在这个价格范围内,功能上的大飞跃是不值得期待的。因此,Honor 依靠一个支持OTG的USB 2.0端口也就不奇怪了。由于存储容量大,缺乏microSD插槽是可以接受的。X8还拥有一个音频插孔和一个FM收音机接收器。然而,缺乏DRM认证是不可理解的。

尺寸比较

165.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.8 mm 195 g164.4 mm 75.7 mm 8.4 mm 190 g161.95 mm 75.53 mm 8.92 mm 181 g163.4 mm 74.7 mm 7.45 mm 177 g

通信、软件和操作--在Honor 智能手机中只有Android 11

Honor X8搭载的是谷歌Android 11和内部的Magic UI 4.2用户界面。在测试时,安全更新截至2022年3月1日,因此还没有完全达到最新水平。可能,Honor ,目标是半年一次的更新节奏,但该公司至今不想对此做出具体声明。不幸的是,这也适用于可能升级到Android 12。

Honor X8的Wi-Fi 5模块工作速度合理,但在与我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000结合使用时,其传输性能不是很稳定。然而,这并没有对日常使用产生负面影响。频率覆盖仅限于欧洲的必要频段,所以X8不是一个环球旅行者。

Honor 智能手机放在耳边时,语音质量很好,但对环境噪音的抑制却相当平庸。在扬声器模式下,用户的声音会有一些回响,但可懂度仍然不错。X8有一个双SIM卡插槽(2个nano-SIM卡),支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。

屏幕保护膜在出厂时就已经贴好了,可以实现体面的滑翔性能。指纹扫描仪位于电源键上,具有很高的识别率。解锁速度相当好;通过前置摄像头进行的面部识别可作为一种替代或补充。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
293 (284min - 301max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
333 (299min - 358max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
356 (293min - 370max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
realme 9i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
306 (89min - 380max) MBit/s ∼86% +1%
Honor X8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
303 (108min - 372max) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (300min - 339max) MBit/s ∼100% +33%
realme 9i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
268 (181min - 318max) MBit/s ∼82% +9%
Honor X8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
247 (47min - 312max) MBit/s ∼75%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Honor X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø247 (47-312)
realme 9i Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø268 (181-318)
Honor X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (108-372)
realme 9i Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (89-380)

摄像机 -Honor X8,带四种光学元件

与Honor X8自拍
与Honor X8自拍

在Honor X8的正面,一个1600万像素的摄像头被嵌入到显示屏中,即使在背光下也能拍摄高对比度和平衡的自拍。拍出的照片对于打印来说不够细致,但对于社交媒体来说确实不错。虚化和美颜滤镜也在其中。

标称的四摄像头(长宽比:4:3,1:1,或全画幅)可以依靠64MP镜头。用它拍摄的照片显示出相对较多的动态,但特写镜头的细节并不总是被最佳地捕捉。超广角当然不是一个亮点,但它显示了相当多的畸变,在外围区域变得有点模糊。微距和深度镜头也出现在规格表上,但它们在日常使用中没有提供任何真正的附加价值。

X8能以30FPS的全高清方式录制视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
8.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor X8: 6.24 ∆E min: 2.39 - max: 9.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.8 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
53 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
65 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
89.9 ∆E
70.5 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor X8: 46.35 ∆E min: 12.97 - max: 89.88 ∆E

显示 -Honor X8中的90赫兹面板

子像素结构
子像素结构

Honor X8有一个6.7英寸的TFT液晶显示屏,由于采用了全高清+分辨率,像素密度很高。当环境光传感器被停用时,显示屏的亮度与竞争对手持平。如果它被激活,屏幕中央的亮度略低,为495 cd/m²,而APL18的测量值略高(516 cd/m²)。

不幸的是,显示器的黑值(0.82cd/m²)增加,阻碍了清晰的对比度。尽管如此,色彩的再现基本上是准确的。刷新率可以设置为60或90赫兹。另外,系统也可以在这两种设置之间自动切换。

445
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 545 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 469.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.32 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 510 cd/m²
Contrast: 622:1 (Black: 0.82 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.45
Honor X8
TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Redmi 10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
realme 9i
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Response Times
-71%
-50%
-20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.94 ?(13.65, 15.29)
42 ?(22.8, 19.2)
-45%
47 ?(27, 20)
-62%
34 ?(17, 17)
-17%
Response Time Black / White *
14.62 ?(5.589, 9.032)
28.8 ?(16.4, 12.4)
-97%
20 ?(9, 11)
-37%
18 ?(7, 11)
-23%
PWM Frequency
Screen
54%
2%
-4%
Brightness middle
510
542
6%
553
8%
508
0%
Brightness
469
518
10%
506
8%
513
9%
Brightness Distribution
78
93
19%
87
12%
97
24%
Black Level *
0.82
0.22
73%
0.44
46%
0.6
27%
Contrast
622
2464
296%
1257
102%
847
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.5
3
-20%
4.64
-86%
3.68
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
6.7
-16%
7.86
-36%
8.36
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
1.4
66%
5.6
-37%
5.7
-39%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.27 97%
2.18 101%
2.153 102%
CCT
6307 103%
6450 101%
8002 81%
7733 84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / 29%
-24% / -8%
-12% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.589 ms rise
↘ 9.032 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.65 ms rise
↘ 15.29 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

灰度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
户外活动
户外活动
视角
视角

性能、排放和电池寿命

Honor X8依靠的是一个 骁龙680 4G它可以使用6GB的LPDDR4x工作内存。图形加速是由 阿德雷诺610集成到SoC中。该芯片组仍然是最新的,但也使用了相当老的Cortex核心。Honor 智能手机管理一个吸引人的系统速度,然而,那些喜欢游戏的人将不得不满足于减少的细节和帧率。

虽然X8在负载下会明显发热,但SoC的冷却功能足以确保性能稳定。内存提供高传输率,这在这个价格范围内并不是理所当然的,因为许多竞争对手使用的是甚至更老的eMMC内存。

Honor X8的扬声器有非常明显的高中音,听起来还是相当不错的,但听觉享受并没有上来。音频插孔可以发挥得更好,并以非常低的噪音(信噪比:98.77 dBFS)说服人。

4,000毫安时的电池提供了非常好的运行时间,很容易让用户度过一天。附带的33瓦电源适配器也允许快速为Honor X8充电。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
379 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
365 Points ∼53% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
155 Points ∼23% -59%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
374 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (374 - 384, n=8)
379 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=272, last 2 years)
683 Points ∼100% +80%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
1571 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points ∼57% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
586 Points ∼26% -63%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1557 Points ∼70% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1557 - 1738, n=8)
1625 Points ∼73% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=272, last 2 years)
2221 Points ∼100% +41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
7645 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8842 Points ∼87% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4966 Points ∼49% -35%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8730 Points ∼85% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5884 - 8730, n=8)
7028 Points ∼69% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=172, last 2 years)
10218 Points ∼100% +34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
2135 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1833 Points ∼36% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1295 Points ∼26% -39%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2166 Points ∼43% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2085 - 2190, n=7)
2162 Points ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13341, n=233, last 2 years)
5077 Points ∼100% +138%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
2040 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1713 Points ∼24% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1175 Points ∼16% -42%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2046 Points ∼28% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1931 - 2096, n=7)
2038 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=233, last 2 years)
7267 Points ∼100% +256%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
2552 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2426 Points ∼74% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2015 Points ∼62% -21%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2722 Points ∼83% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2552 - 2866, n=7)
2723 Points ∼83% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=231, last 2 years)
3270 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1394 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
888 Points ∼36%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1332 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1332 - 1365, n=7)
1349 Points ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=186, last 2 years)
2495 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1250 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
771 Points ∼30%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1159 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1154 - 1188, n=7)
1170 Points ∼45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=186, last 2 years)
2572 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2339 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1899 Points ∼66%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2789 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2683 - 2930, n=7)
2785 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=186, last 2 years)
2870 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
1347 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1416 Points ∼35% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
916 Points ∼22% -32%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1353 Points ∼33% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1347 - 1372, n=8)
1359 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=246, last 2 years)
4090 Points ∼100% +204%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
1186 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points ∼24% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
791 Points ∼15% -33%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1185 Points ∼23% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1175 - 1242, n=8)
1194 Points ∼23% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=246, last 2 years)
5217 Points ∼100% +340%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
2571 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼74% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2054 Points ∼63% -20%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2683 Points ∼82% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2571 - 2853, n=8)
2710 Points ∼83% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=246, last 2 years)
3265 Points ∼100% +27%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
456 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
712 Points ∼23% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
513 Points ∼17% +13%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
446 Points ∼14% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (445 - 457, n=8)
450 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3101 Points ∼100% +580%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
442 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
721 Points ∼21% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
509 Points ∼15% +15%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
417 Points ∼12% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (417 - 463, n=8)
440 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=206, last 2 years)
3420 Points ∼100% +674%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
127 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
182 Points ∼18% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
139 Points ∼14% +9%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
108 Points ∼11% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (22 - 127, n=9)
110.7 Points ∼11% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=162, last 2 years)
996 Points ∼100% +684%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
124 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181 Points ∼18% +46%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
112 Points ∼11% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (112 - 124, n=7)
121.1 Points ∼12% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=157, last 2 years)
985 Points ∼100% +694%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
7.8 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9 fps ∼31% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5.3 fps ∼18% -32%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps ∼29% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (7.8 - 17, n=8)
10.7 fps ∼37% +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 104, n=267, last 2 years)
29.3 fps ∼100% +276%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
9.5 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼28% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.1 fps ∼17% -36%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.7 fps ∼28% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5.1 - 9.8, n=8)
9.08 fps ∼26% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=268, last 2 years)
35.1 fps ∼100% +269%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
4.6 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5.9 fps ∼29% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3.3 fps ∼16% -28%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5.1 fps ∼25% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4.6 - 11, n=8)
6.35 fps ∼31% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=268, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼100% +343%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
3.2 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼26% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼16% -31%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.3 fps ∼25% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1.4 - 3.3, n=8)
3.01 fps ∼22% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=268, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼100% +319%
Honor X8Xiaomi Redmi 10Samsung Galaxy A13 4Grealme 9iAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-57%
-58%
2%
-29%
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB
926.58
321.3
-65%
308.5
-67%
976
5%
775 ?(427 - 1011, n=102)
-16%
946 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=265, last 2 years)
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
510.25
178
-65%
236.8
-54%
719
41%
290 ?(13.6 - 719, n=102)
-43%
501 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=265, last 2 years)
-2%
Random Read 4KB
189.38
100.7
-47%
104.4
-45%
176.8
-7%
150.4 ?(92.6 - 239, n=102)
-21%
171.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=265, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
195.75
95.8
-51%
67.3
-66%
137.4
-30%
129.8 ?(18.2 - 290, n=102)
-34%
167.7 ?(30.3 - 475, n=266, last 2 years)
-14%

温度

Max. Load
 36.2 °C35.7 °C40 °C 
 35.8 °C36 °C39.5 °C 
 36.4 °C34.4 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
33.4 °C35.2 °C35.8 °C
33.5 °C35.2 °C36.7 °C
33.6 °C34.4 °C36.4 °C
Maximum: 36.7 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203938.22524.4353120.430.34018.336.25030.738.86325.536.38023.935.510018.134.31252035.316025.241.120016.847.525014.451.83151749.240011.857.650012.963.463014.666.980013.670.2100012.274.7125013.676160013.874.9200013.474.2250013.473.7315013.478400013.586.8500013.482630013.575800013.276.41000013.579.41250013.668.71600013.358.2SPL25.991N0.779median 13.5median 70.2Delta1.61141.543.435.538.831.730.930.835.532.235.925.12619.423.720.92617.630.215.837.71340.411.743.910.65510.561.711.96813.874.815.478.212.780.81679.812.478.611.676.113.175.713.174.113.775.714.270.114.76715.369.315.967.216.56617.161.626.1880.769.9median 13.8median 681.812.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor X8realme 9i
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor X8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

realme 9i audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
realme 9i
5000 mAh
1056 min ∼40% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=273, last 2 years)
907 min ∼34% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
864 min ∼33% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
858 min ∼33% 0%
Honor X8
4000 mAh
858 min ∼33%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 103)
14h 18min

Pros

+ 像样的相机设置
+ 快速内存
+ 良好的音频插孔质量

Cons

- 没有DRM认证
- 不确定的更新政策
- 面板的高黑值

结论--良好的中产阶级,有小的不足之处

在审查中。 Honor X8.测试设备由德国Honor 提供。
在审查中。 Honor X8.测试设备由德国Honor 提供。

在技术上,Honor X8做得很好,并提供了非常有吸引力的性价比。90赫兹的面板具有体面的亮度,内存容量大,工作速度快,音频插孔具有低噪音播放,电池提供良好的运行时间,还包括快速充电。

Honor

X8在技术上绝对是一款好的智能手机,但不明确的更新政策让人讨厌

在这个价格范围内,5G仍然不是强制性的,Honor ,这并不孤单。DRM认证的情况则不同,这本来是必须的。不明确的更新供应政策也让人恼火,尤其是Honor 智能手机还是用Android 11发货的。至少Android 12应该是可用的。与所有来自Honor 的新智能手机一样,谷歌服务再次被包含在X8中。

替代品是realme 9i或三星Galaxy A13。

价格和可用性

在测试时,Honor 商店里,Honor X8的价格已经降至210欧元。并以实物形式提供进一步的折扣。另外,它也可以在亚马逊Otto可用

Honor X8 - 07/12/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 65%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
85%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 82%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
61%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Honor X8评测 - 经济实惠的中档智能手机,配备64MP摄像头
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-07-15 (Update: 2022-07-15)