Notebookcheck Logo

Honor 70评论 - 纤细的手机节省了SoC的费用

别致。 Honor 70以其不寻常的外观吸引了人们的注意。在我们的测试中,这款奢侈的手机令人信服,但也显示出一些可能成为问题的节约措施......
5G Android ARM Smartphone
Honor 70

Honor 是回来了华为的前分包商现在完全独立。中国人已经推出了 Honor Magic4 Pro魔法4 Lite并证明他们可以在没有前母公司的情况下制造出好的手机,现在终于有了与谷歌服务的无限Android 。

Honor 70是这个新的、但又老式的制造商组合中的一个高价位中档设备,它带来了一些有趣的功能,如快速充电、大量的屏幕空间和高分辨率的广角摄像头。因此,让我们通过我们的综合测试课程来测试这款手机,看看它与类似价格的手机相比如何。

Honor 70 (70 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 8 x 1.9 - 2.5 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 16:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 161.4 x 73.3
Battery
4800 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 66 Watt charging (Honor SuperCharge)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 54 MPix f/​1.9, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @1080p
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, screen protector, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.790W/​kg (head), 1.190W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
178 g
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.9 %
10/2022
Honor 70
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
178 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86.6 %
10/2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85 %
05/2022
Realme GT 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
199.8 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.62"2400x1080
87.4 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
172 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.6 %
07/2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080

Honor 70的设计以不寻常的相机单元为主,它实际上由两个大的圆形元素组成,它们相互排列在一起。此外,在白色型号上有一个装饰有菱形图案的背面,可以折射光线。另一方面,绿色和黑色的变体则覆盖着亚光玻璃,散发出天鹅绒般的光泽。

整个东西看起来非常高质量,并过渡到一个带有轻微曲线的框架。屏幕的边缘也是弯曲的,占据了正面的91%,所以边缘相当纤细。

Honor 70的手感很好,材料的过渡略显明显,但总体上令人愉快。这款手机的重量为178克,就其屏幕尺寸而言相当轻。当底盘扭曲时,可以听到吱吱声,但总的来说,Honor 已经建立了一个稳定的智能手机。

Honor 70
Honor 70
Honor 70
Honor 70
Honor 70
Honor 70

尺寸比较

164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 203 g162.9 mm 75.8 mm 8.6 mm 199.8 g161.4 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 178 g159.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.3 mm 193.5 g158.48 mm 71.99 mm 7.45 mm 172 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 -Honor 70上没有microSD。

Honor 70有两个存储版本,即128GB或256GB的大容量存储,两种情况下都配有8GB的内存。制造商对128GB型号的价格为549欧元,存储升级需要额外花费50欧元。

用于谷歌支付的NFC当然也在其中,但没有微型SD读卡器来扩展存储。

左边:没有连接
左边:没有连接
右边。音量摇杆,待机按钮
右边。音量摇杆,待机按钮
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器

软件 - 大量定制,有时很麻烦

该软件基于Android 12,但Honor 将其MagicUI放在上面,改变了外观和操作的许多方面。

在大多数领域也有自己的应用程序,例如,电话或日历,最终提供与标准Android 软件相同的功能,但外观和操作方式不同。如果你喜欢用谷歌的应用程序工作,你可以简单地安装它们,但Honor 的应用程序只能停用,不能完全删除。

一些第三方应用程序也被预装为广告。

该软件在各方面的设计都不尽如人意:在主屏幕上添加小工具有点复杂。因此,我们希望看到频繁的更新以改善功能。

然而,Honor 在这方面还没有那么好的定位:Honor 70仍然配备了2022年7月的安全补丁,在测试时已经明显过期。两代新软件和三年安全补丁的更新承诺充其量也是标准的。

软件Honor 70
软件Honor 70
软件Honor 70
软件Honor 70

通信和GNSS - 不稳定的WiFi

Honor 70使用一个USB-C端口进行充电和数据传输。这在内部是与USB2.0连接的。

Honor 手机支持许多4G频率,但对于现实世界的手机来说,这还不够:例如,一些在美国使用的频段就没有。

Honor 70是一款5G手机。在这个范围内,频率多样性也很好,但在前往遥远的国家时可能无法接入5G网络。不过,全球最重要的频段,特别是n77和n78,都可以使用。

在我们的城市环境抽样测试中,4G网络的信号强度相当好,但不能完全跟上高端手机的速度。

WiFi 6可作为最大的WLAN标准。因此,Honor 70本身实现了可接受的传输速率,但在我们与参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的测试中,它们波动强烈,而且在整体上也落后于对比设备。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (777min - 812max) MBit/s +123%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
775 (699min - 873max) MBit/s +116%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
651 MBit/s +82%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 (295min - 555max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
909 (846min - 929max) MBit/s +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844 (744min - 917max) MBit/s +1%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
834 (643min - 939max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
687 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1670 (610min - 1889max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1536 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
800 (597min - 1400max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (817min - 939max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (737min - 887max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Honor 70; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (295-555)
Honor 70; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (643-939)
GPS室外测试
GPS室外测试
可用的卫星
可用的卫星

所有全球重要的系统都支持卫星导航,但没有SBAS来提高精度。

当智能手机在户外使用时,需要一段时间才能达到3米的体面定位精度。

我们的实际跟踪测试包括骑自行车,我们也把专门的Garmin Venu 2智能手表作为对比设备。Honor 70在这里表现得相当好,除了轻微的滑动。这款智能手机很适合日常导航。

追踪Garmin Venu 2:概述
追踪Garmin Venu 2:概述
定位Garmin Venu 2:转向
定位Garmin Venu 2:转向
定位Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
定位Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
定位Honor 70: 概述
定位Honor 70: 概述
定位Honor 70: 转机
定位Honor 70: 转机
定位Honor 70: 桥梁
定位Honor 70: 桥梁

电话功能和语音质量 - 良好的麦克风

Honor 它使用自己的手机应用程序,但如果你不喜欢它,可以很容易地用谷歌的应用程序来代替它。

语音质量是相当不同的,这取决于你是使用听筒还是使用扬声器进行免提通话:听筒可以很清楚地再现对方的声音,声音很大,有时还有点轰轰烈烈,而扬声器的声音要薄得多,而且不那么明显。

另一方面,麦克风总是做得非常好,把非常安静和非常响亮的讲话都调节到对方的正常水平,还能过滤掉背景噪音。

照相机 - 在弱光下很好

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

Honor 70的不寻常的两部分相机模块容纳了一个5400万像素的相机传感器(索尼IMX 800)作为主相机。它没有光学图像稳定器,但这在这个价格范围内并不普遍。此外,还有一个5000万像素的广角摄像头,也可用于微距拍摄,以及一个低分辨率的支持摄像头,不能拍摄自己的照片。

那么,高分辨率的传感器已经出现了,这是否也能带来良好的图片质量呢?的确,Honor 70在许多场景中都能很好地提亮图案,而且色彩总体上也令人信服,既不会太夸张,也不会太沉闷。然而,在图像清晰度和细节水平方面,你注意到你是在中端;高端智能手机在这里只是提供了更多。

然而,在弱光下,我们非常喜欢这种结果。该算法选择了一个良好的色彩平衡,非常自然地显示了蜡烛的火焰,即使在放大的情况下,图像也相对清晰。

视频可以以最高4K和30帧的速度录制。 视频质量令人满意,但自动对焦时不时有点慢,必须重新调整。

尽管分辨率很高,但广角摄像头拍出的照片细节非常浑浊,而且镜头变形在边缘非常明显。然而,该相机对于快照来说是足够的。

前面有一个3200万像素的传感器,很茂盛。它可以拍出很好的自拍,即使在放大时也显得非常详细。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle
click to load images

主摄像头的印象在实验室的固定照明条件下也得到了证实:细节上的锐度略微太低,但总体上图像不错。许多细节在1勒克斯下仍然可见。

ColorChecker
22.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 70: 12.37 ∆E min: 3.21 - max: 26.09 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 70: 7.96 ∆E min: 1.47 - max: 15.39 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括快速充电器

Honor 70违背了这一趋势,仍然配备了一个充电器,这也使手机的最大充电功率达到66瓦。

包装中还包括一条USB-C电缆和一个SIM卡工具。令人高兴的是,制造商还包括一个显示箔和一个保护罩。

制造商为Honor 70提供24个月的保修。 保修期.

输入和操作 - 性能良好的屏幕内指纹识别器

触摸屏可以非常精细地操作,并提供一个愉快的表面。在我们的测试中,被拉到边缘的屏幕并没有引起任何类似无意操作的问题:手机甚至可以识别停留在边缘的手部边缘,并直接忽略它们进行触摸操作。

指纹扫描仪位于手机屏幕的下方。它的工作非常可靠,但离下边缘有点近,所以你必须不时地伸手去摸。通过前置摄像头进行的人脸识别也很可靠,但不像带有红外传感器的系统那样可以防伪。

键盘纵向模式
键盘纵向模式
键盘横向模式
键盘横向模式

显示屏 - 明亮的OLED,在Honor 70的直流调光。

子像素结构
子像素结构

Honor 在其高价位的中端设备上依靠OLED屏幕,它可以拥有扩大的全高清分辨率和120赫兹的最大帧率。在我们的测试中,该屏幕提供了相当平常的亮度,但它的亮度并不像人们期望的OLED屏幕那样均匀。

在我们对PWM闪烁的测量中,我们看到了一条振幅曲线,其方向与屏幕的帧率一致。在这里,Honor 可能依靠直流调光控制来避免振幅的强烈波动。因此,该显示器也应该适用于更敏感的用户。

721
cd/m²
751
cd/m²
824
cd/m²
716
cd/m²
749
cd/m²
803
cd/m²
714
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
808
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 824 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 758.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 749 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.143
Honor 70
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Realme GT 2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.62
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
-1%
-22%
19%
9%
Brightness middle
749
781
4%
759
1%
954
27%
620
-17%
Brightness
758
782
3%
756
0%
961
27%
625
-18%
Brightness Distribution
87
94
8%
98
13%
98
13%
98
13%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.72
2
-16%
2.14
-24%
1.5
13%
1.24
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.96
2.9
2%
5.68
-92%
2.5
16%
2.31
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.3
-5%
2.8
-27%
1.8
18%
1.7
23%
Gamma
2.143 103%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.318 95%
CCT
6767 96%
6852 95%
6517 100%
6254 104%
6325 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 61 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 61 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 61 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

亮度0
亮度0
亮度25%
亮度25%
亮度50%
亮度50%
亮度75%
亮度75%
亮度100%
亮度100%

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

在使用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行测量时,我们注意到了非常好的色彩表现。我们为此使用了颜色模式 "正常";在这里可以获得最精确的结果。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外,由于高对比度和良好的亮度,即使在晴天,显示屏仍然容易阅读。然而,应避免阳光直射。

由于采用了OLED屏幕,平视角度下的图像再现也非常好。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

表现 - 本来可以有更多的表现

随着 高通骁龙778G+Honor 选择的SoC也被用于 Nothing Phone (1)但也被用于价格更低廉的 摩托罗拉Edge 30.由于像realme GT 2这样的智能手机在Honor 70的价格范围内也有,所以 realme GT 2,或 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion与去年的高端处理器提供,Honor 70在我们的基准测试中时不时地有点落后。

然而,与高端SoC约20%的性能差距并不巨大,Honor 70的功率很容易满足我们测试中的大多数应用。在日常使用中,只有当你运行非常复杂的应用程序或同时执行众多任务时,你才会注意到差异。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1158 Points +42%
Realme GT 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1130 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +12%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (813 - 826, n=3)
821 Points +1%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
813 Points
Multi-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3544 Points +21%
Realme GT 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3477 Points +19%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (2872 - 2998, n=3)
2933 Points 0%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2929 Points
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points 0%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
829929 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points +4%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (553328 - 582264, n=3)
564791 Points +1%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
558781 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (11662 - 15194, n=3)
13225 Points +3%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
12820 Points
Realme GT 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12804 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12136 Points -5%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -9%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
828 Points +13%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (730 - 760, n=3)
741 Points +2%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
730 Points
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
612 Points -16%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6382 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +12%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points +3%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5150 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (4768 - 5150, n=3)
4950 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points -7%
System
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10909 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (10424 - 10940, n=3)
10758 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9864 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -11%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points -15%
Memory
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6569 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +1%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6203 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (4762 - 6203, n=3)
5243 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points -23%
Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14811 Points +115%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +106%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (6893 - 8175, n=3)
7528 Points +9%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points +9%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6893 Points
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1728 Points +15%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points +6%
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1509 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (1273 - 1511, n=3)
1431 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -16%
AImark - Score v2.x
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
139804 Points
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
71546 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (5777 - 139804, n=3)
50468 Points -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points -85%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5823 Points -96%

与高端SoC的差异在GPU方面更加明显,因此那些运行图形密集型应用程序或经常玩耍的人将在这个价格范围内找到比Honor 70更好的智能手机。

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1521 Points +105%
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1498 Points +102%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1205 Points +62%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
742 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -8%
Wild Life Extreme
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1548 Points +108%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1519 Points +104%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1291 Points +74%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
743 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -7%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5896 Points +121%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5764 Points +116%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4194 Points +57%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2666 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2576 Points -3%
Wild Life Score
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5886 Points +121%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5688 Points +113%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4179 Points +57%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2666 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2570 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2854 Points +9%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2625 Points
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5665 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5412 Points -4%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4513 Points 0%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4505 Points
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5040 Points +3%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4971 Points +1%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4912 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4518 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10930 Points +82%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8353 Points +39%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5990 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5759 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8677 Points +52%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7256 Points +27%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5711 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5428 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5305 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5060 Points -5%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5546 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5345 Points -4%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4603 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4265 Points -7%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +2%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
111 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
185 fps +31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps 0%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
141 fps
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps +76%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps +47%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +3%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +74%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps +51%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps +1%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +81%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +44%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +12%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps +58%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +7%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +77%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +47%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +10%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +77%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +6%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +71%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +57%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +5%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +86%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +71%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +50%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps +7%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +84%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +78%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +53%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +13%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps +89%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +76%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +8%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps

在上网时,测试设备的速度非常快,加载网站的速度很快,而且通常在滚动时加载图片。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +6%
Honor 70 (Chrome 106)
100.428 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
100.393 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (73.7 - 100.4, n=3)
88.1 Points -12%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points -27%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.8 Points -48%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +68%
Honor 70 (Chome 106)
63.69 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (53.7 - 66.5, n=3)
61.3 runs/min -4%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
54.1 runs/min -15%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -16%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +5%
Honor 70 (Chrome 106)
127 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (102 - 127, n=3)
115 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points -20%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
37446 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +2%
Honor 70 (Chrome 106)
32794 Points
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (24488 - 32794, n=3)
29797 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -45%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (1236 - 1796, n=3)
1456 ms * -18%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444 ms * -17%
Honor 70 (Chrome 106)
1236.1 ms *
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
1117.9 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

有趣的是,Honor ,在其较高价位的中档手机中只使用了UFS 2.2内存,这比所有对比设备中的UFS 3.1内存要慢。这导致在实践中出现相当大的速度差异,至少在线性写入和读取过程中,人们也注意到这一点。

Honor 70Xiaomi 11TRealme GT 2Motorola Edge 30 FusionNothing Phone (1)Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
32%
25%
35%
-7%
29%
Sequential Read 256KB
974.1
1790
84%
1914.4
97%
1870.18
92%
1638
68%
Sequential Write 256KB
776.2
942
21%
776
0%
689.24
-11%
1351.9
74%
696 ?(369 - 913, n=23)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
227.4
139.3
-39%
283.6
25%
248.86
9%
240.6
6%
Random Write 4KB
251.3
133.3
-47%
267.3
6%
276.74
10%
228.2
-9%

游戏 - 60帧是可能的

在游戏时,Honor 70并没有最佳地使用其120赫兹的屏幕,但至少60帧往往是相当稳定的:例如,在PUBG MobileArmajet的最低设置下。在更复杂的游戏中,帧率会下降,或者受到游戏的限制。我们用GameBench的软件测量帧率.

通过触摸屏和位置传感器的控制工作没有问题。

总的来说,Honor 70很容易玩,尽管它肯定不能满足游戏爱好者的要求。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Honor 70; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60.4 (59-61)
Honor 70; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.2.0: Ø59.5 (55-61)
Honor 70; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø39.4 (37-41)

排放 - 变得温暖,但不节流

温度

在摄像机周围的上部区域,可以感受到高达44.5℃的最高负荷温度。这是相当热的,但还不至于让人不舒服。

SoC似乎没有受到温度上升的影响:3DMark压力测试没有显示出性能下降,即使在运行了20次苛刻的基准测试之后。

Max. Load
 42.8 °C38.8 °C34.6 °C 
 44.4 °C39.3 °C34.9 °C 
 44.5 °C38.5 °C35.2 °C 
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
35 °C37.7 °C42.3 °C
35 °C38.1 °C43.4 °C
34.9 °C38.6 °C43.1 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 %
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 % -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 70
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 %
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % -1%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 % -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.9 % -22%
051015202530Tooltip
Honor 70 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.43 (4.43-4.44)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.08 (6.98-7.67)
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.86 (7.09-9.1)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14)
Honor 70 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.8 (15.7-16)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.6 (23.7-24.8)
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29 (25.4-34.3)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)

演讲者

令人遗憾的是,只有一个扬声器:所有的对比设备都配有立体声扬声器,或者至少将听筒作为第二个扬声器,以创造更多的声音音量。

Honor 70的最大音量也相当平庸,整体声音是平衡的,但总是有点遥远和高音重的感觉。听音乐时不会产生真正的聚会感觉。

外部音频设备也可以通过USB-C端口和蓝牙5.2连接。支持SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD编解码器,但缺少aptX Adaptive等更现代的编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.238.52540.341.93131.534.14030.336.35033.740.46323.728.38022.420.910022.719.512515.521.91601938.220015.346.625014.351.731513.955.140015.258.150015.760.863015.363.180018.364.5100017.169.612501874.2160014.872.2200014.370.6250014.269.4315014.966.2400015.362.750001663.9630016.961800016.2671000017.168.31250016.267.51600016.650.3SPL28.180.6N145.9median 15.7median 63.1Delta1.18.743.942.834.532.927.729.928.530.533.232.626.321.623.418.222.522.215.426.214.637.112.345.213.351.911.655.17.557.811.46515.26814.769.811.872.71273.810.3769.374.910.875.314.775.714.368.714.963.4156615.465.616.860.316.157.81751.425.984.30.755.4median 14.6median 652.19.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 70Nothing Phone (1)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 70 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nothing Phone (1) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--充电快,但也很快就空了

能源消耗

在能源消耗方面,Honor 70证明在所有性能水平上都相当贪婪:在满负荷情况下需要高达8.9瓦特,最低为1.3瓦特。

4,800毫安时的电池可以用高达66瓦的功率进行充电,因此最多只需要一个多小时,直到电池再次充满。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.6 / 2.1 Watt
Load midlight 5.3 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor 70
4800 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
4400 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
12%
23%
23%
17%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
0.78
40%
0.83
36%
1
23%
1.067 ?(0.9 - 1.3, n=3)
18%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.86
-16%
1.72
-8%
1.2
25%
1.333 ?(1.2 - 1.6, n=3)
17%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
1.88
10%
1.75
17%
1.5
29%
1.7 ?(1.5 - 2.1, n=3)
19%
Load Average *
5.3
3.98
25%
2.76
48%
4.2
21%
4.37 ?(3.6 - 5.3, n=3)
18%
Load Maximum *
8.9
8.78
1%
6.74
24%
7.4
17%
7.8 ?(7.1 - 8.9, n=3)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

012345678910Tooltip
Honor 70: Ø5.36 (2.48-10.2)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

0123456Tooltip
Honor 70; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.5 (5.26-6.08)
Honor 70; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.58 (1.445-2.1)

电池寿命

它的电池容量略低于,例如 小米11Trealme GT 2和相当高的手机功耗,在电池运行时间上也很明显:Honor 70在这里只能达到平庸的水平。

在Wi-Fi测试中测得的13:14小时还不错,完全可以满足一个密集的工作日,但即使在这个价格范围内,也有智能手机的持续时间明显更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 21min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 18min
Honor 70
4800 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Realme GT 2
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
4400 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
21%
-14%
5%
Reader / Idle
2001
2244
12%
1813
-9%
H.264
944
1450
54%
1059
12%
WiFi v1.3
794
813
2%
964
21%
686
-14%
926
17%
Load
258
267
3%
259
0%

Pros

+ 良好的弱光照片
+ 良好的自拍质量
+ 准确的跟踪
+ 纤细、别致的设计
+ 快速充电技术
+ 准确的指纹扫描仪
+ 明亮的OLED屏幕,具有直流调光功能

Cons

- 平庸的单声道扬声器
- 只有平均的电池寿命
- 不太稳定的无线网络
- 部分繁琐的软件
- 更新政策薄弱
- 内存相对较慢

结论 - 初期问题

在审查中。 Honor 70.测试设备由德国Honor 提供。
在审查中。 Honor 70.测试设备由德国Honor 提供。

Honor 70的亮点当然是相机设置,它可以用一个大的主传感器来说服人,在图像清晰度方面不能提供高端质量,但在低光下可以拍摄非常好的照片。Honor在Magic4 Pro中已经使用的 "伟大的图像算法",在Magic4 Pro中也有很大的贡献。Honor Magic4 Pro.自拍相机也能让我们信服。

纤细而独立的设计,带有直流调光的明亮的OLED屏幕,良好的跟踪功能,以及快速充电技术也是为Honor 70说话的要点。

然而,我们不想掩盖我们在测试中注意到的消极方面:单声道扬声器听起来相当重的高音,Wi-Fi连接不太稳定,而且在电池寿命方面,在这个价格范围内有更好的智能手机。

然而,Honor ,特别是在软件和定期更新方面,仍需迎头赶上:未来的安全补丁和改进必须更快,否则竞争对手将拉开距离。

Honor 70提供了良好的摄像设备和独立的设计,但在电池寿命和声音质量方面不得不做出让步。

如果你正在寻找替代方案:更多的性能和不寻常的生物聚合物的设计是由 realme GT 2.如果你在寻找替代方案:更多的性能和不寻常的生物聚合物设计由realme GT 2提供。 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion提供纯粹的Android ,也有一个相当好的自拍相机。

价格和可用性

Honor 70可以直接从制造商那里购买。https://www.hihonor.com/de/phones/honor-70/buy/根据内存配置的不同,你需要支付550或600欧元。不过,你会得到Honor Earbuds 3 Pro和一个箱子作为礼物。

如果你想省钱,你也可以从amazon.de获得该设备那里的128GB版本在测试时仅售不到500欧元。另一方面,256GB版本在amazon.de的价格为600欧元.

Honor 70 - 10/21/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 70%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
53 / 64 → 83%
Application Performance
74 / 86 → 86%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
73%
Average
78%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Honor 70评论 - 纤细的手机节省了SoC的费用
Florian Schmitt, 2022-10-25 (Update: 2022-10-25)