Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G的回顾。高科技的可折叠智能手机

运作良好。 三星还提供了Galaxy Z Flip3 5G,这是一款更轻薄的折叠手机,采用了Z Fold3的改进机制。但不仅是折叠技术的改进,硬件也是最先进的。我们的评测揭示了这套完整的方案能做什么。
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

在我们对三星Galaxy Z Flip 的评论中,我们不得不批评其平庸的显示感觉,低劣的通话质量,以及缺乏存储扩展的问题。虽然后者在Galaxy Z Flip3 5G中仍然存在,但我们的审查将揭示其余的批评点是否已经得到解决。

我们的三星折叠手机评测样本配备了8GB内存和128GB存储,售价约为1050欧元(约合1232美元)。这意味着它必须面对装备类似的竞争对手,即使没有可折叠显示屏,其价格也是类似的。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Galaxy Z Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.70 inch 22:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 426 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 99 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, compass, gyroscope, proximity
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G GSM (GSM850, GSM900, DCS1,800, PCS1,900), 3G UMTS (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B8 (900)), 4G LTE TDD/FDD (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B3 (1,800), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B7 (2,600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 166 x 72.2
Battery
3300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.55") plus 12 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2, 1/3")
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.4, 1/3.24")
Additional features
Speakers: dual, stereo, Keyboard: on-screen, Keyboard Light: yes, USB-C cable (no power adapter), SIM tool, One UI 3.1, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (body): 1.14 W/kg, SAR value (head): 0.591 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
183 g
Price
1,049 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.2 %
09/2021
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
183 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2640x1080
88.4 %
04/2021
OnePlus 9 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
86.8 %
06/2021
Sony Xperia 1 III
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
88.7 %
03/2021
Oppo Find X3 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
193 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
82.2 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
SD 855+, Adreno 640
183 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"2636x1080
75.8 %
08/2020
Motorola Razr 2019
SD 710, Adreno 616
205 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.20"2142x876

三星在Galaxy Z Flip3 5G的框架上使用了金属。外观由康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus保护,显示屏再次被保护膜覆盖。与前代产品相比,这款折叠式手机现在有IPX8标准的防水保护,但并不防尘。

铰链本身给人以非常坚固的印象,并允许将屏幕调整到几乎任何角度。智能手机在大约135°的角度下保持稳定,只有在更平的角度下才会向后倾斜。没有锁扣机制将显示屏锁住。

打开后,Flip3 5G是我们测试领域中最薄的智能手机,也是最轻的设备,重量为138克。折叠后的最大厚度约为1.5厘米。

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

Size comparison

172 mm 72 mm 6.9 mm 205 g167.3 mm 73.6 mm 7.2 mm 183 g165 mm 71 mm 8.2 mm 186 g166 mm 72.2 mm 6.9 mm 183 g163.2 mm 73.6 mm 8.7 mm 197 g163.6 mm 74 mm 8.26 mm 193 g

连接性 - 折叠式三星手机没有SD读卡器

除了最新的SoC,三星在Z Flip3 5G中安装了8GB的内存。基本版本配备了128GB的内部存储。如果再加收大约50欧元(约59美元),还可以提供256GB的容量。

不能插入microSD卡。此外,只有一个nano SIM插槽,但也可以设置一个额外的eSIM。也支持VoWLAN和VoLTE。

USB-C端口根据2.0标准传输数据;Camera2 API支持3级,DRM Widevine L1也可用。

软件--几个第三方应用程序

Galaxy Z Flip3 5G正在运行Android 11操作系统,上面有三星的One UI 3.1界面。所提供的体验与纯粹的Android ,但用户在短暂的熟悉期后就会习惯它了。制造商使用了许多自己的应用程序,例如,在画廊应用程序的情况下。

此外,控制三星的可穿戴设备和智能家居产品的适当的应用程序已经可用。通过Galaxy Store,三星还提供了自己的应用商店。此外,也有来自微软的应用程序,但它们可以很容易地被卸载,就像前面提到的所有应用程序一样。

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 软件

通信和GNSS - 带有快速Wi-Fi的5G智能手机

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G可以通过使用GSM、3G、LTE和5G网络建立移动连接。使用LTE Cat.X,下载速度可以达到2Gb/s,上传速度可以达到300Mb/s。 20.然而,不支持毫米波5G。

在近距离内,数据可以通过NFC、蓝牙5.2和Wi-Fi 6传输。结合我们参考的Netgear Nighthawk AX12路由器,三星的翻盖手机实现了平均816 Mb/s的数据传输和800 Mb/s的数据接收的Wi-Fi速度。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1281 (635min - 1400max) MBit/s ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
816 (736min - 883max) MBit/s ∼64%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
680 (649min - 703max) MBit/s ∼53% -17%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
676 (632min - 694max) MBit/s ∼53% -17%
Motorola Razr 2019
Adreno 616, SD 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (447min - 657max) MBit/s ∼48% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
474 (405min - 541max) MBit/s ∼37% -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=285, last 2 years)
453 MBit/s ∼35% -44%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (806min - 865max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
800 (421min - 886max) MBit/s ∼95%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (635min - 854max) MBit/s ∼95% 0%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
697 (500min - 767max) MBit/s ∼83% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
605 (299min - 640max) MBit/s ∼72% -24%
Motorola Razr 2019
Adreno 616, SD 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
569 (236min - 657max) MBit/s ∼68% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=285, last 2 years)
448 MBit/s ∼53% -44%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855460421509686733809861869838862786861856875868886856863790759849862856805858839881879815874460421509686733809861869838862786861856875868886856863790759849862856805858839881879815874867849839850859757868831783739759784759758736751772837851851883818843838818831817854845827Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø799 (421-886)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (736-883)
在室内进行GPS测试
在室内进行GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
支持多频段(单频)。
支持多频段(单频)。

Z Flip3 5G可以通过GPS、伽利略、北斗和GLONASS确定其位置。QZSS和SBAS也是可用的。使用 "GPS测试 "应用程序,我们在户外实现了高达4米的精度。

在我们通常的自行车骑行中,与我们的参考设备Garmin Edge 500相比,三星智能手机在曲线上只出现了轻微的偏差。

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - GNSS(摘要
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - GNSS(摘要
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - GNSS(转折点
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - GNSS(转折点
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - GNSS(湖)。
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - GNSS(湖)。

电话和通话质量 - 清晰的连接

Z Flip3 5G的电话应用程序允许用户轻松访问数字键盘,以及查看保存的联系人和最近的通话。通话时音量很大,双方都能很好地理解。环境噪音抑制也能可靠地工作。

照相机 - Z Flip3 5G可以拍出好照片

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

三星为Galaxy Z Flip3 5G配备了一个用于自拍的1000万像素相机传感器。与Fold3 5G 相比,这不是一个显示屏下的摄像头,而是一个冲孔摄像头。用它拍摄的人像照片的图像质量非常好。它们显示了许多细节和良好的色彩,但在放大后会表现出轻微的颗粒感。有各种颜色的过滤器可用于调整图像质量。专业模式只限于主摄像头。

Z Flip3的主摄像头配备了两个1200万像素的传感器。它们都能提供非常好的照片,有大量的细节和生动的色彩。当一个传感器拍摄普通的广角和宽屏照片时,第二个传感器配备了一个超广角镜头。没有光学变焦,这意味着只能用软件来放大拍摄对象。由此产生的质量也相应适中,导致图像看起来模糊不清,细节被冲淡。Flip3的摄像头可以在低光照条件下清晰地捕捉到我们的测试对象。然而,颜色看起来太暗,细节有点模糊。专业模式可用于手动调整,允许对ISO、快门速度、照明、聚焦、白平衡和对比度进行自定义设置。

视频的质量与我们的照片样本相似。可用的分辨率是UHD和全高清,分别为30或60帧,以及30帧的高清。就像照片一样,也有一个专业模式,具有相同的设置,加上选择声音来源的选项。后者可以在手机的麦克风、USB和蓝牙之间进行切换。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-upPanoramaUltra wide-angleZoom (5x)Low-light
click to load images
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G: 7.11 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 15.16 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
49.7 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
27 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
69 ∆E
40 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
49.7 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G: 43.33 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 69.01 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括电源适配器

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G的包装盒中只配备了一根USB-C电缆和一个SIM卡工具。兼容的电源适配器和其他配件可以单独向制造商购买。

三星给予Z Flip3 5G的买家24个月的保修期。Care+保险套餐免费赠送一年。

输入设备和处理 - 尽管显示屏上有折痕,但反应灵敏

Galaxy Z Flip3 5G的主显示屏可以像任何传统的触摸屏一样使用,但与带有固定玻璃表面的机型相比,它的滑行性能略差一些。在每一个点上都能可靠地捕捉到敲击声,甚至在显示屏有褶皱的地方。另一方面,小型外部显示器对触摸的反应有点迟钝。

谷歌的GBoard可用于文本输入,并且可以通过各种方式进行定制。用于音量控制的外部按钮和带有集成指纹传感器的电源按钮有一个牢固的压力点,也能可靠地被触发。在日常测试中,用存储的指纹解锁设备通常需要多次尝试。在这方面,人脸识别的效果要好得多。

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 输入
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 输入
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 输入
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 输入

显示屏 - 明亮的AMOLED面板

子像素网格 - 外部显示
子像素网格 - 外部显示
子像素网格 - 内部显示
子像素网格 - 内部显示

三星Galaxy Z Flip3配备了6.7英寸可折叠AMOLED面板。此外,外面还有一块1.9英寸的Super AMOLED显示屏。内显示屏还支持10至120赫兹的自适应刷新率。也支持HDR10+。

根据我们的测量,在禁用环境光传感器的情况下,主显示屏实现了430cd/m²的最大亮度。在APL 50测试中,达到了非常好的1127cd/m²。最低亮度为1.99cd/m²。由于平均最大亮度为820 cd/m²,这款折叠式智能手机能够在我们的测试领域处于领先地位。

PWM 用于亮度控制,在亮度水平低于2%时,频率为120Hz。在此之上,频率范围在235.8和242.7赫兹之间。

854
cd/m²
834
cd/m²
835
cd/m²
854
cd/m²
832
cd/m²
839
cd/m²
855
cd/m²
834
cd/m²
840
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 855 cd/m² Average: 841.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 832 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.70
OnePlus 9 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Sony Xperia 1 III
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
Oppo Find X3 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Dynamic AMOLED, 2636x1080, 6.70
Motorola Razr 2019
P-OLED, 2142x876, 6.20
Screen
8%
-113%
12%
-42%
-138%
Brightness middle
832
733
-12%
537
-35%
759
-9%
705
-15%
428
-49%
Brightness
842
746
-11%
539
-36%
776
-8%
709
-16%
428
-49%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
95
-2%
94
-3%
97
0%
89
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.9
0.95
50%
4.78
-152%
0.8
58%
3.1
-63%
6.39
-236%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.3
2.01
39%
7.83
-137%
1.8
45%
5.4
-64%
10.83
-228%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.7
-21%
5.8
-314%
1.6
-14%
2.7
-93%
5
-257%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.21 100%
2.363 93%
2.23 99%
2.11 104%
2.25 98%
CCT
6453 101%
6591 99%
7982 81%
6512 100%
6264 104%
7649 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

作为典型的AMOLED,该面板的色彩再现以及对比度和黑度都非常好。该显示器还可以使用 "鲜艳 "和 "自然 "色彩配置文件进行定制。

CalMAN - 色彩准确度(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。
CalMAN - 色彩准确度(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。
CalMAN - 色彩空间(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。
CalMAN - 色彩空间(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。
CalMAN - 灰度(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。
CalMAN - 灰度(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。
CalMAN - 饱和度(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。
CalMAN - 饱和度(sRGB,配置文件 "自然")。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.4 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

由于显示亮度高,Z Flip3 5G可以在户外轻松使用。只有非常平坦的视角才会导致恼人的反射和眩光。

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 户外使用
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 户外使用
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 户外使用
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 户外使用

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G的面板是非常稳定的可视角度。这使得即使从平坦的角度观看内容,也不会因此而使颜色失真。

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 视角稳定性
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 视角稳定性
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 视角稳定性
三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 视角稳定性

性能 - 三星的高性能智能手机

三星为Galaxy Z Flip3 5G配备了高通骁龙888 5G,可提供流畅的系统运行。结合8GB的内存,在某些情况下,根据不同的学科,可以达到明显低于其他采用这种SoC的智能手机平均水平的基准测试结果。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1107 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1134 Points ∼100% +2%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1123 Points ∼99% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
738 Points ∼65% -33%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
394 Points ∼35% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=21)
1121 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=249, last 2 years)
596 Points ∼53% -46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3471 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3666 Points ∼100% +6%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3629 Points ∼99% +5%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3535 Points ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2665 Points ∼73% -23%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1448 Points ∼39% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3379 - 3810, n=21)
3599 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4829, n=249, last 2 years)
2028 Points ∼55% -42%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3926 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4544 Points ∼95% +16%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4124 Points ∼86% +5%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4415 Points ∼92% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=20)
4777 Points ∼100% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=146, last 2 years)
2188 Points ∼46% -44%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3100 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4604 Points ∼99% +49%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4662 Points ∼100% +50%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4656 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4764, n=20)
4582 Points ∼98% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=148, last 2 years)
2273 Points ∼49% -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12374 Points ∼84%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11705 Points ∼79% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11705 - 17085, n=15)
14724 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=68, last 2 years)
9959 Points ∼68% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7991 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7363 Points ∼87% -8%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2840 Points ∼34% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7991 - 9221, n=3)
8422 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=236, last 2 years)
3483 Points ∼41% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10111 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9480 Points ∼85% -6%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2857 Points ∼25% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10111 - 13263, n=3)
11212 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=236, last 2 years)
4066 Points ∼36% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4609 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4133 Points ∼90% -10%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2780 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4462 - 4609, n=3)
4556 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=236, last 2 years)
2816 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8320 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8562 Points ∼80% +3%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10642 Points ∼100% +28%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8768 Points ∼82% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6601 Points ∼62% -21%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2859 Points ∼27% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8257 - 11302, n=15)
10026 Points ∼94% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=259, last 2 years)
4237 Points ∼40% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10551 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11227 Points ∼72% +6%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
15592 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13647 Points ∼88% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7751 Points ∼50% -27%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2931 Points ∼19% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 16863, n=15)
14739 Points ∼95% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=259, last 2 years)
5444 Points ∼35% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4782 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4676 Points ∼93% -2%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5041 Points ∼100% +5%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3895 Points ∼77% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4344 Points ∼86% -9%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2634 Points ∼52% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3562 - 5344, n=15)
4792 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=257, last 2 years)
3019 Points ∼60% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7074 Points ∼74%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8347 Points ∼87% +18%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6110 Points ∼64% -14%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9540 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5141 Points ∼54% -27%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2006 Points ∼21% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=16)
8738 Points ∼92% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=260, last 2 years)
3460 Points ∼36% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7930 Points ∼64%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11050 Points ∼89% +39%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10037 Points ∼81% +27%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12394 Points ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5424 Points ∼44% -32%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1866 Points ∼15% -76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=16)
11691 Points ∼94% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=260, last 2 years)
3993 Points ∼32% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5134 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4497 Points ∼85% -12%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
2579 Points ∼49% -50%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5283 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4348 Points ∼82% -15%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2720 Points ∼51% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=16)
4723 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=260, last 2 years)
3055 Points ∼58% -40%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3958 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5736 Points ∼98% +45%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5851 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5657 Points ∼97% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=20)
5653 Points ∼97% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9386, n=113, last 2 years)
2968 Points ∼51% -25%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3959 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5737 Points ∼98% +45%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5850 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5721 Points ∼98% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=20)
5574 Points ∼95% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=109, last 2 years)
3100 Points ∼53% -22%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1236 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1497 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1559, n=15)
1503 Points ∼100% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 3059, n=61, last 2 years)
953 Points ∼63% -23%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1077 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1423 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (997 - 1555, n=15)
1417 Points ∼100% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=58, last 2 years)
931 Points ∼65% -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
116 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼52% -48%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼52% -48%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
57 fps ∼49% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=15)
103 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
61.7 fps ∼53% -47%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
175 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
258 fps ∼100% +47%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
230 fps ∼89% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼64% -5%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
65 fps ∼25% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 290, n=15)
248 fps ∼96% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=204, last 2 years)
117 fps ∼45% -33%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
90 fps ∼98%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼65% -33%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼60% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
56 fps ∼61% -38%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
40 fps ∼43% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 120, n=15)
92.3 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps ∼53% -45%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
104 fps ∼69%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
151 fps ∼100% +45%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
127 fps ∼84% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
73 fps ∼48% -30%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
32 fps ∼21% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 177, n=15)
143 fps ∼95% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=203, last 2 years)
68.1 fps ∼45% -35%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
61 fps ∼86%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼80% -7%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps ∼51% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼58% -33%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
30 fps ∼42% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=15)
70.9 fps ∼100% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=201, last 2 years)
38.3 fps ∼54% -37%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
75 fps ∼76%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
69 fps ∼70% -8%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
93 fps ∼94% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼52% -32%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
23 fps ∼23% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 121, n=15)
98.9 fps ∼100% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=201, last 2 years)
46.8 fps ∼47% -38%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
35 fps ∼78%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps ∼80% +3%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼62% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼56% -29%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼36% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=15)
45 fps ∼100% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=200, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼54% -31%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
44 fps ∼74%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
59 fps ∼99% +34%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼92% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
31 fps ∼52% -30%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼22% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 72, n=15)
59.5 fps ∼100% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=200, last 2 years)
28.2 fps ∼47% -36%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
43 fps ∼78%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼100% +28%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
53 fps ∼96% +23%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
38 fps ∼69% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
23 fps ∼42% -47%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
17 fps ∼31% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=20)
55.1 fps ∼100% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼44% -44%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
46 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
63 fps ∼88% +37%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
66 fps ∼92% +43%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
72 fps ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
16 fps ∼22% -65%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼19% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=21)
71 fps ∼99% +54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
28.4 fps ∼39% -38%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
32 fps ∼76%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps ∼100% +31%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
37 fps ∼88% +16%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
25 fps ∼60% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
34 fps ∼81% +6%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
11 fps ∼26% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=20)
37.4 fps ∼89% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
16.2 fps ∼39% -49%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
19 fps ∼49%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼72% +47%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
27 fps ∼69% +42%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼72% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
39 fps ∼100% +105%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5.2 fps ∼13% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=20)
27.7 fps ∼71% +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11 fps ∼28% -42%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
636471 Points ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 815441, n=12)
774425 Points ∼100% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=58, last 2 years)
502616 Points ∼65% -21%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
569595 Points ∼79%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
718779 Points ∼100% +26%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
673630 Points ∼94% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
463291 Points ∼64% -19%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
205722 Points ∼29% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (569595 - 740847, n=11)
683568 Points ∼95% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=178, last 2 years)
346046 Points ∼48% -39%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5908 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6959 Points ∼100% +18%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6822 Points ∼98% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4998 Points ∼72% -15%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2970 Points ∼43% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5908 - 6959, n=15)
6507 Points ∼94% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 7123, n=189, last 2 years)
3806 Points ∼55% -36%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11319 Points ∼96%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11774 Points ∼100% +4%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11438 Points ∼97% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8507 Points ∼72% -25%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5678 Points ∼48% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9696 - 11774, n=15)
10888 Points ∼92% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=189, last 2 years)
6883 Points ∼58% -39%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6208 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9044 Points ∼100% +46%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8220 Points ∼91% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5434 Points ∼60% -12%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
3368 Points ∼37% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=15)
7341 Points ∼81% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=189, last 2 years)
4527 Points ∼50% -27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9399 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13463 Points ∼95% +43%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
14211 Points ∼100% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9334 Points ∼66% -1%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
3112 Points ∼22% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=15)
13581 Points ∼96% +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15739, n=189, last 2 years)
5945 Points ∼42% -37%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1845 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1633 Points ∼89% -11%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1621 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1446 Points ∼78% -22%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1307 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=15)
1699 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=189, last 2 years)
1302 Points ∼71% -29%

Z Flip3 5G在浏览器基准测试中取得了非常好的成绩,使其在我们的测试领域处于领先地位。因此,网站可以非常流畅地滚动,媒体内容也可以快速获得。

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93)
197.67 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (119 - 210, n=14)
167 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
139.44 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
124.52 Points ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
113.88 Points ∼58% -42%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=187, last 2 years)
95.6 Points ∼48% -52%
Motorola Razr 2019 (Chrome 83)
54.208 Points ∼27% -73%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93)
156 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 166, n=13)
140 Points ∼90% -10%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
129 Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 4689)
103 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
98 Points ∼63% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=193, last 2 years)
80.9 Points ∼52% -48%
Motorola Razr 2019 (Chrome 83)
57 Points ∼37% -63%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93)
36969 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 46075, n=15)
34811 Points ∼94% -6%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
27914 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
26829 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
23781 Points ∼64% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=201, last 2 years)
18720 Points ∼51% -49%
Motorola Razr 2019 (Chrome 83)
9771 Points ∼26% -74%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=203, last 2 years)
3764 ms * ∼100% -296%
Motorola Razr 2019 (Chrome 83)
3557.6 ms * ∼95% -274%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
2076.8 ms * ∼55% -119%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
1808 ms * ∼48% -90%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
1645.9 ms * ∼44% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (919 - 1841, n=15)
1368 ms * ∼36% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93)
950 ms * ∼25%

* ... smaller is better

我们测试的三星手机配置了128GB的UFS 3.1存储。后者实现了良好的读取和写入速度,仅略低于我们测试的其他设备的平均值。

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GOnePlus 9 ProSony Xperia 1 IIIOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy Z FlipMotorola Razr 2019Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
11%
4%
-22%
-70%
-6%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
1619.57
1995
23%
1947.6
20%
1778.9
10%
1442.56
-11%
510.2
-68%
1582 ?(1330 - 1790, n=23)
-2%
807 ?(41.9 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
749.82
769
3%
742
-1%
759.29
1%
523.39
-30%
186.4
-75%
761 ?(527 - 1095, n=23)
1%
365 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
-51%
Random Read 4KB
276.6
258.7
-6%
267.8
-3%
273.33
-1%
184.51
-33%
88.6
-68%
234 ?(133 - 317, n=23)
-15%
142 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
-49%
Random Write 4KB
250.56
254.3
1%
316.8
26%
267.15
7%
212.87
-15%
80.1
-68%
230 ?(121 - 306, n=23)
-8%
132 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
-47%

游戏--流畅的游戏没有问题

一个Qualcomm Adreno 660,负责显示三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G中的图像内容。这个内部图形单元也适用于要求较高的游戏,它可以在任何时候都能流畅地运行这些游戏。

我们测试的标题,ArmajetPUBG Mobile,即使在高图形设置下,也没有表现出任何卡顿或类似的情况。使用触摸屏来控制游戏也没有问题。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版

排放 - 负载下性能稳定

温度

Galaxy Z Flip3 5G的表面温度在负载下上升到35.9°C(约97°F)。因此,这款三星智能手机只是适度升温,可以一直拿在手里,没有任何问题。在长时间的Wild Life耐力压力测试中,性能也能保持稳定。

3DMark Wild Life stress test

0510152023.722.220.820.920.920.920.820.820.820.920.920.920.820.920.920.820.820.920.920.923.722.220.820.920.920.920.820.820.820.920.920.920.820.920.920.820.820.920.920.95.495.485.485.485.485.495.55.55.495.495.485.485.495.495.485.485.495.495.485.48Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.1 (20.8-23.7)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.49 (5.48-5.5)
Max. Load
 35.2 °C35.3 °C32.6 °C 
 35.4 °C34.8 °C31.7 °C 
 34.6 °C35.2 °C30.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
29.6 °C35 °C35.5 °C
29.5 °C33.5 °C35.9 °C
29.1 °C33.1 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 32.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
热图-内部
热图-内部
热图-外观
热图-外观

发言人

Galaxy Z Flip3的扬声器提供相对较高的音量和以较高音调为主的声谱。这使得它们很适合用于语音再现。然而,当涉及到复杂的媒体内容,如音乐时,应该倾向于使用外部扬声器或耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.541.42526.226.13128.222.14028.325.55024.635.66322.524.68030.325.81002625.412520.130.81602147.720017.349.125015.555.131519.357.340019.562.750014.567.663014.167.580014.770.1100014.671.9125015.874.3160015.175.1200013.275.7250013.776.4315013.281.4400013.880.5500013.777.6630013.574.9800013.476.11000013.4751250013.471.41600012.462.3SPL26.888.6N0.873.5median 14.5median 71.4Delta2.5104344.236.835.836.829.930.631.83432.32930.225.521.829.322.523.93014.241.111.346.611.754.29.757.19.358.211.861.613.761.317.363.416.269.511.169.610.373.110.471.711.668.212.670.313.970.415.268.915.663.916.367.716.565.116.461.317.154.670.970.660.268.865.971.426.481.126.125.712.522.219.226.50.848.4median 13.9median 63.42.48.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GOnePlus 9 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 9 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 在Wi-Fi下9小时

能源消耗

Galaxy Z Flip3 5G在负载情况下最大功耗为5.89瓦,在我们的空闲情况下平均功耗为0.74瓦,是一款非常节俭的智能手机。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.46 / 0.74 / 0.78 Watt
Load midlight 4.73 / 5.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
3300 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
3300 mAh
Motorola Razr 2019
2510 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-149%
-85%
-23%
-40%
-88%
-86%
Idle Minimum *
0.46
1.6
-248%
0.93
-102%
0.59
-28%
0.7
-52%
1.055 ?(0.46 - 1.8, n=18)
-129%
0.953 ?(0.37 - 2.5, n=217, last 2 years)
-107%
Idle Average *
0.74
2
-170%
1.54
-108%
0.88
-19%
1.2
-62%
1.531 ?(0.74 - 2.6, n=18)
-107%
1.806 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=217, last 2 years)
-144%
Idle Maximum *
0.78
2.4
-208%
1.69
-117%
0.95
-22%
1.8
-131%
1.706 ?(0.78 - 3.1, n=18)
-119%
2.04 ?(0.69 - 4.2, n=217, last 2 years)
-162%
Load Average *
4.73
6.2
-31%
6.38
-35%
4.97
-5%
3.2
32%
5.5 ?(4.21 - 6.44, n=18)
-16%
4.48 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=217, last 2 years)
5%
Load Maximum *
5.89
11
-87%
9.58
-63%
8.37
-42%
5.2
12%
9.84 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=18)
-67%
7.32 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=217, last 2 years)
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910114.534.640.9484.34.331.3153.95.054.464.240.7991.974.510.7864.820.8311.4752.224.91.0542.813.645.855.80.7533.870.9435.577.157.165.623.121.2634.964.360.8822.541.4315.315.330.7781.0382.635.225.255.445.510.9534.155.653.910.9710.7980.8678.798.578.118.868.729.268.7910.18.968.829.198.941.95110.19.7410.50.921.0056.168.838.768.568.157.263.3711.20.88110.50.82711.210.65.730.9470.8651111.410.55.2910.90.86711.11.0121.088.551.9772.287.040.8429.569.610.8510.710.910.41.8643.6111.21.4513.76.696.76.686.696.680.7714.750.926.676.696.576.686.696.696.676.686.696.676.676.691.1190.9284.54.516.686.696.586.676.684.460.8721.0310.8380.8031.4471.4922.92Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.09 (0.753-11.4)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213144.548.6812.512.212.913.313.113.813.213.513.313.313.413.513.31312.912.712.712.512.612.812.412.612.412.412.812.612.414.412.56.296.055.976.226.236.196.315.765.795.946.07665.946.015.915.725.935.995.936.035.965.895.995.995.945.955.885.835.945.95.965.995.594.548.6812.512.212.913.313.113.813.213.513.313.313.413.513.31312.912.712.712.512.612.812.412.612.412.412.812.612.414.412.56.296.055.976.226.236.196.315.765.795.946.07665.946.015.915.725.935.995.936.035.965.895.995.995.945.955.885.835.945.95.965.995.590.560.6060.6240.9060.6810.6030.6660.6370.6290.640.5770.6410.620.6370.670.6320.6120.850.6050.7030.6070.5880.610.6490.9190.6380.6030.5810.6010.6850.5830.5820.5831.1080.7030.6670.5940.6140.6040.6990.6160.620.5780.6650.7360.7010.6140.5740.5810.6840.5810.580.5920.7180.6150.5650.580.5830.6110.5990.588Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.1 (4.54-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø0.644 (0.56-1.108)

电池寿命

在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中,这款来自三星的折叠式智能手机实现了约9小时的运行时间。这意味着它很好地利用了其3300毫安时的电池,但它不能像其前辈那样持续很长时间,即 Galaxy Z Flip.

Z Flip3 5G支持快速充电,这需要一个单独的电源适配器,容量为15瓦。使用适当的充电站,可以实现高达10瓦的无线充电。

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 01min
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
3300 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
3300 mAh
Motorola Razr 2019
2510 mAh
Sony Xperia 1 III
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
541
1002
85%
757
40%
647
20%
469
-13%
534
-1%

Pros

+ 明亮的OLED显示屏,刷新率为120 Hz
+ 系统运行速度快
+ 符合IPX8标准的防水性
+ 良好的相机性能

Cons

- 没有存储扩展
- 只有USB 2.0
- 电池寿命应该更好

结论--三星完美的可折叠产品

在审查中。三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G。测试设备由:德国三星公司
在审查中。三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G。测试设备由:德国三星公司

与更大的Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ,Z Flip3 5G被证明是其前辈的全面改进版。明亮的显示屏,极其流畅的系统,以及良好的相机质量,几乎使这款手机的独特功能逐渐被遗忘。

三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G是一款技术成熟的智能手机,由于其可折叠屏幕,可以以特别紧凑的方式存储。

但可折叠屏幕也给人留下了良好的印象。虽然你不得不忍受折痕处的轻微波纹,但这并不影响内容的再现和触摸屏的反应速度。

因此,Galaxy Z Fold3 5G是一款彻底成功的智能手机,只是让我们希望有更长的电池寿命,也许还有一个存储卡读卡器。即使你对折叠功能不感兴趣,这款三星手机也能轻松地与竞争对手如OnePlus 9 ProOppo Find X3 Pro

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时, 三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G在亚马逊(约925美元)百思买(约999美元) 等卖家处广泛销售,例如。

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - 09/20/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
90%
Battery
85%
Display
91%
Games Performance
53 / 64 → 83%
Application Performance
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
77%
Average
81%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 432 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18108 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Z Flip3 5G的回顾。高科技的可折叠智能手机
Mike Wobker, 2021-09-24 (Update: 2021-09-24)