三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 评测--出色的平板电脑，惊艳因素弥补了弱点

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Brand: Samsung

对于游戏玩家来说也非常有趣！ Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的目标是将工作和休闲两个世界融为一体。在我们的测试中，这款Galaxy 平板电脑在游戏和多媒体使用方面表现出了一定的优势，在生产力领域也能与 S Pen 配合使用，表现令人信服。但这也有它的价格......

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/23/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Tablet

根据三星的说法，Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 平板电脑是同类产品中第一款为用户提供工作和休闲两不误的优质套装。因此，Tab S9 系列中的 XXL 平板电脑在设备方面只使用最好中的最好才是合理的。它配备了强大的骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy和更新的杜比 Atmos AKG 四扬声器系统。除了这些硬件升级之外，Tab S9 Ultra 还希望主要通过一些较小的细节将自己与前代产品区分开来。

与Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 相比，Tab S8 Ultra Tab S8 Ultra(建议零售价 1149 欧元起，约合人民币 1224 元）几乎可以称得上是物美价廉：2023 机型的 256 GB 版本的建议零售价为 1339 欧元（约合 1427 美元），由于不再有 128 GB 版本，其基本价格比前代产品高出 190 欧元（约合 202 美元）。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Galaxy Tab S9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 740

Memory

12 GB

Display

14.60 inch 16:10, 2960 x 1848 pixel 239 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen , native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 462 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, eSIM, Wireless Samsung DeX

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n40/n77/n78), 4G (B1/B3/B7/B8//B20/B28), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 2G (B2/B3/B5/B8), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 326.4 x 208.6

Battery

11200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, 26 mm, 1.0µm) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, wide angle lens), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm) + 12 MPix (f/2.4, wide angle lens)

Additional features

Speakers: Quad-audio system, Keyboard: OnScreen, info material, USB cable, S Pen, One UI 5.1.1, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR: 0,931 W/kg (body), 0,931 W/kg (head), fanless, waterproof

Weight

732 g

Price

1609 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
90.6 %	09/2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	732 g	5.5 mm	14.60"	2960x1848
88.8 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	726 g	5.5 mm	14.60"	2960x1848
88.8 %	08/2023	Lenovo Tab Extreme Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	740 g	7.2 mm	14.50"	3000x1876
89.1 %	09/2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	750 g	6.53 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
91.8 %	11/2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048

保护套 -Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra，IP 防护等级

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra、Tab S9+ 和 Tab S9 尺寸对比

与Tab S8 Ultra2023 代 Tab S8 Ultra 在外观上几乎没有任何变化，只是重量略微增加了 6 克（约 0.2 盎司）。与前代产品一样，超大的 14.6 英寸 OLED 显示屏使单手握持几乎成为不可能，但厚度仅为 5.5 毫米（约 0.22 英寸）的超大平板电脑同样拥有近乎荒诞的纤薄机身，给人一种非常优质和坚固的感觉。所谓的 "铠甲铝 "一体成型机身可防止变形，不会出现任何问题。不过，由于采用了块状设计，在人体工学方面也略有妥协。

那些不喜欢前代产品深石墨色的人，现在也许会喜欢米色版本的平板电脑。两个版本的三星平板电脑都采用了哑光表面，可以很好地隐藏指纹。作为首款Galaxy Tab，S9 Ultra 配备的 S Pen 现在通过了官方 IP68 认证。

正面采用康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃，类似于Lenovo Tab Extreme 和Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 。目前，最新一代的保护玻璃（Victus 1/2）似乎还不能用于 XXL 显示屏，尽管这种折衷似乎并不适合价格昂贵的 1340 欧元（约合 1428 美元）平板电脑。另一方面，由于采用了非常纤薄的显示屏边框，正面的显示屏与表面的比例达到了一流的水平，接近 91%。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab Extreme Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 最大容量为 1 TB 的三星平板电脑

三星提供各种存储配置的高端平板电脑，除 WiFi 版外，还有 5G 版：

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra - WiFi| 256 GB| 12 GB| 1,339 欧元建议零售价（约合 1,427 美元）

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra - WiFi| 512 GB| 12 GB| 1,459 欧元建议零售价（约合 1,554 美元）

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra - WiFi| 1 TB| 16 GB| 1,759 欧元建议零售价（约合 1,874 美元）

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra - 5G| 256 GB| 12 GB| 1,489 欧元建议零售价（~1,587 美元）

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra - 5G| 512 GB| 12 GB| 1,609 欧元建议零售价（~1,715 美元）

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra - 5G| 1 TB| 16 GB| 1,909 欧元建议零售价（约合 2,034 美元）。

Tab S9 Utra 提供快速 USB 3.2 连接（第一代），这也是该价位机型应有的配置。它不仅支持高达 5 Gbit/s 的数据传输，还可以使用适配器将图像输出到外部显示器。它支持微软系统喜欢的 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统，但后者只能用于读取。我们无法使用三星 980 Pro 进行复制测试，因为连接的固态硬盘无法识别。

对于下一代产品，我们希望三星能从竞争对手那里获得一些灵感，因为Lenovo Tab Extreme 就提供了两个 USB-C 端口。这对于一款以提高生产力为目的的平板电脑来说非常有用，因为它可以让 Tab S9 Ultra 与一些配件一起使用，或者在充电时作为第二个显示屏使用。不过，"第二屏幕 "功能还可以让您使用无线局域网在三星平板电脑上反射或扩展具有无线显示功能的电脑显示屏。

背面长长的底边包含我们已经知道的金属针脚，可以连接可选的三星保护盖。

microSD 读卡器

Tab S9 Ultra 的内部 UFS 4.0 存储空间可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。
在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡进行的 JPEG 拷贝测试中，传输速率可以接受，但Galaxy 平板电脑并没有充分利用它的全部功能。在跨平台磁盘测试中，Tab S9 Ultra 表现出色。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	53.47 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	53 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	48.6 MB/s -9%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.3 (32.1-51.3)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.8 (27.3-49)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (44.6-82.4)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.6 (31.3-81)

软件 -Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra，含Android 13

在本次测试中，三星将Android 13 操作系统 13 与自己的 One UI 5.1.1 版用户界面相结合，其中还包括 Bixby 智能助手、DeX 表面和 2023 年 8 月起的安全补丁。此外，三星还利用 Knox Vault 平台保护其 Ultra 平板电脑，该平台由一个安全处理器单元组成，可将密码或生物识别数据等敏感数据与主操作系统隔离。

在介绍Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 时，三星强调其Android 平板电脑的应用优化效果更好。在最常用的3,265个Android 应用程序中，有25%已经过全面优化，另有51%的应用程序在多任务处理场景下的可用性将得到改善，这些都要归功于三星实验室。作为特别赠品，Galaxy Tab S9 Utra 的用户将获得三星平板电脑独有的Android 版 Good Notes 应用程序，包括一年的免费订阅。LumaFusion、Clip Studio Paint 和 ArcSite 还为希望摆脱 iPad 的内容创作者和设计师提供了优化的平板电脑用户界面。

不过，对这家韩国制造商的高端平板电脑来说，最大的优点仍然是产品更新周期长。没有其他制造商能提供四代 One UI 和Android OS 升级以及五年的安全更新，即使是谷歌的Pixel 平板电脑。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 配备 5G 功能

虽然Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 没有提供 Wi-Fi 7，但它支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准，这意味着 6 千兆赫频段可用于无线局域网传输--至少理论上是这样。在与我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器结合使用时，三星平板电脑只能在 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段上进行连接，即使在这种情况下，Tab S9 Ultra 也不能充分利用其接收能力。我们测得的最高传输速率不到 800 Mbit/s。三星不允许在 5 GHz 范围内使用 VHT160 实现更高的传输速率。不过，三星仍有可能通过升级提供 6E 功能。

除了蓝牙 5.3 的 Wi-Fi 版本外，还可以选择购买 5G 版本的 Tab S9 Ultra，它可以使用骁龙 X70 调制解调器.除了 5G 频率外，Galaxy ，这款平板电脑还支持所有必要的 LTE 频段（在德国）。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	957 (890^min - 975^max) MBit/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	832 (779^min - 876^max) MBit/s +13%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	806 (614^min - 856^max) MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	738 (702^min - 792^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	442 (222^min - 528^max) MBit/s -40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	956 (876^min - 983^max) MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	952 (490^min - 980^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (488^min - 984^max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	909 (871^min - 942^max) MBit/s -5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	486 (175^min - 591^max) MBit/s -49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1785 (1685^min - 1866^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1635 (1256^min - 1717^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	747 (145^min - 917^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1632 (1604^min - 1667^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1132 (682^min - 1286^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	702 (225^min - 834^max) MBit/s

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (1256-1717)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1132 (682-1286)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø737 (702-792)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø805 (614-856)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (490-980)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø956 (876-983)

理论上，那些想把这款 14.6 英寸的三星大平板电脑用作自己 DIY 的特斯拉仪表盘的人也可以使用 Wi-Fi 版的全球导航卫星系统模块进行导航，但 A GPS 仍是 5G 版的专利。在我们的测试中，平板电脑使用 GPS（L1）、伽利略（E1）、北斗（B）和格罗纳斯（L1）卫星系统定位。即使在室内，它也能准确无误地找到卫星，延迟时间约为 4 米（约 13 英尺）。

实际上，Tab S9 Ultra 的定位精度也非常高。为此，我们将记录的路线与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。在我们的自行车之旅记录路线中，几乎没有任何值得一提的偏差。

摄像头 - 配备双摄像头系统的三星平板电脑

前置摄像头的技术与前代产品相比几乎没有任何变化。这两个摄像头的分辨率均为 1200 万像素，在日光条件下可提供清晰度和照明度都很高的优质记录。使用广角和超广角镜头可以以 30 帧/秒的 UHD 画质录制视频。

在背面，我们已经从 Tab S8 Ultra 上了解到了 1300 万像素的摄像头。 Tab S8 Ultra的 1300 万像素摄像头。尽管考虑到非常高昂的价格，它的拍摄质量还可以更好，但应该可以满足大多数平板电脑用户的需求。无论是照度还是清晰度都无法令人信服。分辨率为 800 万像素的超广角摄像头名义上有所改进，但却显得过于模糊，尤其是在边缘区域，细节捕捉也不够吸引人。这两个镜头还显示出颗粒结构，尤其是在较暗的图像区域。虽然三星将更多的精力放在前置摄像头的设置上是合情合理的，但对于一款售价 1400 欧元的平板电脑来说，其拍摄性能还是相当令人失望的。

背面的两个传感器最大只能以 30 帧/秒的 UHD 画质录制视频，而超广角镜头则不提供 4K 选项。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Weitwinkel Weitwinkel Low Light Ultraweitwinkel Zoom 5x

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S9 Ultra

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S9 Ultra

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S9 Ultra

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S9 Ultra

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S9 Ultra

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

我们在受控光线条件下对 Tab S9 Ultra 的色彩还原进行了评估，并与实际参考色彩进行了比较。除了一些轻微的提亮之外，1300 万像素镜头在 ColorChecker Passport 中几乎没有出现任何偏差，这对于平板电脑来说值得一提。Galaxy Tab 在色彩准确度（>10）方面完全没有显示任何异常值。

配件和保修 -Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 不含充电器

正如已经在Tab S8 Ultra与 Tab S8 Ultra 一样，三星将配件限制为一条 USB 线缆（Type-C 到 Type-C）、一个用于打开卡槽的小工具和 S Pen。你还可以选择购买一个书本盖键盘（建议零售价：390 欧元，约合人民币 416 元），它具有可调节的设置角度和发光键盘，以及一个新的户外盖（建议零售价：90 欧元，约合人民币 96 元）。

三星为其高端平板电脑提供 24 个月的保修服务，您还可以以 109 欧元（约合 116 美元）的价格购买 Care+ 保险套餐。此外，三星 Care+ 还提供为期两年的防盗保护，价格为 155 欧元（约合 165 美元）。

输入设备和操作 - 配备 S Pen 的三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

从巨大的 OLED 显示屏到触摸屏的各个角落，所有输入都能准确快速地实现。得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率，平板电脑的操作感觉非常流畅。与 iPad Pro 12.9 相比，16:10 的屏幕格式使观看电影时的黑条明显减少。

附带的 S Pen 可以通过磁力吸附在外壳顶部和背面。新功能是实用的双向充电功能，无论笔指向哪个方向，都可以在连接到背面时为其充电。创作者版的 S Pen 也是新产品，与标准 S Pen 相比，它采用了结构化材料，书写角度更大。凭借 2.8 毫秒的低延迟和 120 Hz 的高刷新率，附带的三星手写笔可提供舒适的书写和绘图体验。我们无法证实一些技术论坛上提到的延迟问题。

指纹传感器位于横向显示屏的右侧边缘，用拇指即可轻松触及。与上一代和 S23 Ultra 一样，只使用了光学传感器，而不是超声波传感器。 Galaxy S23 Ultra。但我们的手指总是能被快速识别，然后面板也能很快解锁。前置摄像头允许通过生物特征人脸识别进行解锁。在测试中，相当不安全的人脸识别的响应速度和识别率都令人信服。

显示屏 -Galaxy 配备 OLED 的平板电脑

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 采用 RGB 子像素矩阵，拥有一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LCD。

Tab S9 Ultra 配备 14.6 英寸 OLED 大显示屏，分辨率为 2,960 x 1,848 像素。内置的动态 AMOLED 2X 面板目前只用于三星Galaxy 旗舰智能手机Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 也是首次采用。动态刷新率应该继续在 60 和 120 Hz 之间自动调节，但根据系统规格，Tab S9 Ultra 也使用 30 Hz，例如在 Chrome 浏览器或照片库中。在旗舰平板电脑Galaxy S23 Ultra 中，仍然没有出现高达 1 Hz 的自适应刷新率。

三星平板电脑的最大亮度规定为 950 尼特，但在 APL18 测试中，我们只能达到 900 cd/m² 的亮度。在适用于 HDR10+、HDR10 和 HLG 的面板上，HDR 内容的显示效果也相应吸引人。在没有任何暗区的纯白色显示屏上，AMOLED 显示屏在我们的测量中达到了 625 cd/m² 的稳定最高值。

为了控制显示亮度，三星采用了脉宽调制技术。在整个亮度范围内，OLED 的典型闪烁频率为 240 赫兹。尽管振幅均匀，但我们还是不能排除敏感人群感到不适的可能性。


619 cd/m²	620 cd/m²	622 cd/m²
617 cd/m²	621 cd/m²	620 cd/m²
619 cd/m²	625 cd/m²	613 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 625 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 619.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 621 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.12

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.60	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Super AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.60	Lenovo Tab Extreme OLED, 3000x1876, 14.50	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 14.00	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.90
Screen		-13%	-31%	28%	0%
Brightness middle	621	600 -3%	479 -23%	630 1%	611 -2%
Brightness	620	604 -3%	456 -26%	591 -5%	605 -2%
Brightness Distribution	98	96 -2%	90 -8%	85 -13%	92 -6%
Black Level *				0.82
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.9	2.7 -42%	3.2 -68%	0.6 68%	1.4 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.6	5.3 -15%	6.82 -48%	1 78%	3.3 28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.8 -13%	1.8 -13%	1 37%	2.3 -44%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.09 ^105%	2.28 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6602 ^98%	6461 ^101%	6794 ^96%	6624 ^98%	6930 ^94%
Contrast				768

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦水平和不同亮度调节下的测量系列

我们使用照片光谱仪和 Calman 软件对色彩还原进行了分析，结果显示 Tab S9 Ultra 与 sRGB 色彩空间的 Delta E 偏差非常小。但你必须在显示屏色彩调节中选择 "自然 "色彩模式。在这种模式下，肉眼几乎看不到任何偏差。不过，你只能在 "鲜艳 "模式下手动调节色温，这意味着你必须在精确的色彩校准和个人偏好的白平衡之间做出不必要的妥协。在 "鲜艳 "模式下，更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间将取代 sRGB。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8225 ms rise
1.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.923 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.5 ms rise
3.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.68 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 可以非常方便地在户外使用。尽管显示屏上的反光会增加阅读内容的难度，但显示内容在阳光直射下也依然清晰可辨。亮度传感器能快速识别光线条件的变化。三星提到了新的视觉增强技术。您还应该注意到，当亮度传感器关闭时，只能达到 360 cd/m² 的较低亮度。

三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的视角稳定性非常好，没有明显的色彩失真。从陡峭的视角看，亮度会明显下降，但这在日常操作中几乎不会起任何作用。

性能 -Galaxy 配备高通 SoC 的 Tab S9 Ultra

Tab S9 Ultra 的性能来自快速的骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy12 或 16 GB 内存。不出所料，Tab S9 Ultra 在我们的基准测试中表现非常出色。在 Geekbench 测量中，高通 SoC 明显领先于联发科 Dimensity 9000的联想 Tab Extreme.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1890 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1598 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1542 - 1598, n=7)	1561 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1389 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1242 Points -22%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1217 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points -58%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	8524 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4906 - 5198, n=7)	5020 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	4989 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	4367 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	3736 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	3393 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points -53%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1416727 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1086936 - 1286774, n=8)	1181107 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1112212 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1005158 Points -10%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	950385 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	889268 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points -59%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	16584 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (15270 - 17267, n=8)	16185 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	15983 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	13996 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	13407 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points -45%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1584 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1263 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1120 - 1332, n=8)	1239 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1098 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1090 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	948 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points -47%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8541 - 9337, n=8)	8859 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	8784 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	7589 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	7255 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	6816 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points -59%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	Points -100%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1374 - 14401, n=8)	12462 Points +807%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	12132 Points +783%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	10112 Points +636%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	9398 Points +584%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points +376%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1374 Points
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8467 - 9212, n=8)	8823 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	8738 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	8726 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	7900 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	6763 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points -51%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	31738 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (21505 - 31928, n=8)	28672 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	22308 Points -30%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	19973 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	19574 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points -79%
Web
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1907 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1460 - 2032, n=8)	1768 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1584 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1574 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1415 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points -24%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1216 - 156427, n=6)	27143 Points +2032%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=39, last 2 years)	5325 Points +318%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1283 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1273 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	73266 Points +358%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	30392 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	15986 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1267 - 16702, n=8)	14423 Points -10%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	13748 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points -44%

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	5534 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (5149 - 5652, n=6)	5408 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	4690 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	4513 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)	2287 Points -59%
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	2079 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1984 - 2107, n=6)	2048 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1798 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1777 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)	812 Points -61%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy

Average of class Tablet

图形加速由高通 Adreno 740.在 GFXbench 中，Tab S9 Ultra 在离屏测试中达到了强大的数值，尽管仍略低于 Galaxy S23 Ultra.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6909 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3489 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2463 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2361 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2325 Points -33%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6919 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3563 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2488 Points -30%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2345 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2337 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	25317 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14789 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9785 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9519 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8621 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14098 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11937 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8799 Points -38%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24172 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17683 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14734 Points -39%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5748 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5647 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3651 Points -36%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	873 fps +107%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	447 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	421 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	294 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	288 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +14%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	494 fps +119%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	265 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	217 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps -24%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +51%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -34%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	340 fps +101%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	175 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	169 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	149 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -32%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	48 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -10%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -42%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	214 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	102 fps -9%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -39%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	70 fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	39 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -13%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	90 fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps -8%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -29%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	241 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -25%

在日常操作中，在 Chrome 浏览器中冲浪非常流畅，没有任何较长时间的延迟。这也反映在浏览器基准测试中，Tab S9 Ultra 与前代产品相比有了大幅提升前代产品.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	225.315 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	192.313 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8)	173.4 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	127.177 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	126.3 Points -34%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	105.645 Points -45%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points -56%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	227 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8)	165.5 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	151 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	100 Points -34%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	99 Points -34%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)	85.7 Points -43%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	342 Points +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (183 - 243, n=3)	219 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	183 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	173 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	121 Points -34%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points -34%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	376 runs/min +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	191 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6)	168.7 runs/min -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	119 runs/min -38%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	110 runs/min -42%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min -60%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	74614 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	62837 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8)	59058 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	48281 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	47420 Points -25%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	40762 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points -63%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -406%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	1121.3 ms * -77%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	1103.4 ms * -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	839 ms * -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8)	795 ms * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	634.3 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	450.9 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

三星平板电脑快速的 UFS 4.0 存储确保了超过 3,000 MB/s 的高数值。不过，Tab S9 Ultra 在写入小数据块时略显薄弱。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	Lenovo Tab Extreme	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-27%	8%	24%	67%	-56%
Sequential Read 256KB	3367.33	1817 -46%	1914.4 -43%	1983.47 -41%	3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19) 10%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) -75%
Sequential Write 256KB	1891.49	451.6 -76%	1585 -16%	1873.45 -1%	3042 ?(1524 - 3678, n=19) 61%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) -72%
Random Read 4KB	449.37	238 -47%	330.7 -26%	374.54 -17%	416 ?(268 - 480, n=19) -7%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) -63%
Random Write 4KB	174.32	284.9 63%	380.6 118%	446.71 156%	530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=19) 204%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -13%

游戏 -Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 达到 120 帧/秒

我们使用GameBench 的应用程序来确定准确的帧速率，并评估 Tab S9 Ultra 是否也适合 HFR 游戏。Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 是否也适合 HFR 游戏。尽管显示屏分辨率很高，但 Adreno 740应该可以提供相当强大的游戏性能。

在目前最高的图形设置（UHD）下，《PUBG Mobile》的显示帧率稳定在 40 帧/秒，而在 60 帧/秒时，显示的细节（HD）稍差。在低图形设置下，也支持 90 帧/秒选项。幸运的是，像《Armajet》（我们的第二款游戏）这样专门为此设计的游戏都能达到面板的原生刷新率，Tab S9 Ultra 也能相对稳定地保持 120 帧/秒。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra; Armajet: Ø119.1 (107-120)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.5 (84-91)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.5 (47-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (36-41)

排放 - 三星平板电脑保持凉爽

温度

三星平板电脑的外壳在不同位置有不同程度的发热，但发热并不明显。Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的新型双向热量分布确保了足够的散热，即使在持续负载的情况下也不会出现严重的节流现象。3DMark 测试显示，在较长的负载阶段，性能下降约为 25%。Tab S9 Ultra 的内部蒸汽冷却室的运行效率明显低于其他笔记本电脑。联想 Tab Extreme.

Max. Load

Idle


41.3 °C	36.8 °C	33.8 °C
36.7 °C	33.4 °C	32.6 °C
34.6 °C	34.2 °C	33.3 °C

Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 35.2 °C


34.6 °C	42.6 °C	42.7 °C
33.4 °C	34.1 °C	38.3 °C
32 °C	34.1 °C	33.8 °C

Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 36.2 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.8 (56.7-76)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø40.4 (34.9-53.1)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.7 (46.6-47.1)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.1 (55.9-56.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.4 (18.2-23.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.55-14.1)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.2-14.3)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.7 (14.7-14.8)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	99.6 (14.7^min - 14.8^max) % +28%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	99.5 (14.2^min - 14.3^max) % +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	77.6 (18.2^min - 23.4^max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	67.9 (9.55^min - 14.1^max) % -12%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	65.1 (27.1^min - 41.5^max) % -16%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	99 (55.9^min - 56.5^max) % +33%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	98.9 (46.6^min - 47.1^max) % +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	74.7 (56.7^min - 76^max) %
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	69.6 (82.8^min - 119^max) % -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	65.8 (34.9^min - 53.1^max) % -12%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	74.6 (113.6^min - 152.4^max) %

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

发言人

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 为用户提供了四个扬声器，根据三星的说法，这四个扬声器的体积增大了约 20%。其中两个位于平板电脑的左侧边缘，两个位于右侧边缘。四个扬声器产生的音质非常吸引人，中音和高音以线性方式产生。低音也很明显。

虽然有些用户会非常怀念通过 3.5 毫米音频端口输出音频的选项，但音频内容可以通过 USB-C 端口的适配器输出。在无线输出方面，蓝牙 5.3 支持有限的 SBC、AAC、aptX、SSC 和 LDAC 音频编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab Extreme audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 -Galaxy 配备 11,200 mAh 电池的 Tab S9 Ultra

耗电量

容量为 11,200 毫安时的大容量电池提供动力。它的最大充电功率为 45 瓦。根据制造商的说法，Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 可使用可选的 45 瓦快速充电器（建议零售价：50 欧元，约合 53 美元）在大约 1.5 小时内完全充满电。

在闲置状态下，这款 14.6 英寸大平板电脑的耗电量与前代产品持平。在负载情况下，我们使用 Burnout 基准测试的新设置显示，与 Tab S8 Ultra 相比，功耗明显更高。 Tab S8 Ultra.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.21 Watt
Idle	3.17 / 3.68 / 3.91 Watt
Load	15.83 / 15.84 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 11200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 11200 mAh	Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh
Power Consumption		16%	16%	-46%	-73%
Idle Minimum *	3.17	3.18 -0%	2.6 18%	2.57 19%	2.54 20%
Idle Average *	3.68	3.84 -4%	3 18%	8.65 -135%	11.24 -205%
Idle Maximum *	3.91	3.88 1%	3.4 13%	8.71 -123%	11.48 -194%
Load Average *	15.83	8.04 49%	9.5 40%	14.98 5%	12.97 18%
Load Maximum *	15.84	10.44 34%	16.9 -7%	14.99 5%	16.6 -5%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy: Ø9.63 (3.89-15.7)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000: Ø9.78 (6.33-16.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.2 (8.89-14.4)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.2 (15.3-16.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.63 (3.57-3.74)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.2 (3.01-3.66)

电池寿命

在调整亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 明显领先于去年的一代产品。去年的一代产品在无线局域网测试中为 10.5 小时，在视频重现测试中为近 12 小时。由于采用了大尺寸 OLED 面板，运行时间只能达到平均水平。但尤其是在负载情况下，达到的数值并不差。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 23min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 116)		10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 16min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 11200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 11200 mAh	Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh
Battery Runtime		-8%	-1%	44%	12%
Reader / Idle	1043	949 -9%	1059 2%		1839 76%
H.264	704	651 -8%	745 6%		816 16%
WiFi v1.3	623	521 -16%	664 7%	898 44%	671 8%
Load	376	387 3%	306 -19%		173 -54%

Pros

+ 高品质外观

+ 精美的 OLED 面板

+ 高性能

+ 更新周期长

+ IP 等级

+ 功能强大的 S Pen

Cons

- 不包括充电器

- 缺乏高级特性（WiFi 7、LTPO 技术等）

- 轻微节流

- 对 BT 编解码器的支持可能更好

三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的评价

测试三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra。测试设备由 NBB.com (notebooksbilliger.de) 提供

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的结构非常纤薄，尤其是 14.6 英寸超大 AMOLED 面板周围的显示屏边框非常小，让人惊叹不已。这款三星平板电脑的起售价超过 1,300 欧元（约合 1,385 美元），肯定不是为讨价还价者准备的，但除了外观吸引人之外，它还为购买者提供了很多其他价值。

虽然 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra的缺点是电池续航时间较短，但三星在第二代 XXL 平板电脑中弥补了这一不足。尽管 Tab S9 Ultra 的续航时间仍未达到 Apple iPad Pro 12.9的水平，但我们的电池测试结果已经达到了令人满意的范围。除了电池续航时间外，Tab S8 Ultra 的继任者不仅在性能上，而且在细节上也有了很大的改进。例如，我们可以在这里提到 S Pen 实用的双向充电功能。

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 并没有给人太多抱怨的理由。有能力的用户将获得目前最好的平板电脑之一，包括长期更新支持。

有点遗憾的是，尽管市场建议零售价很高，但三星并没有为其高端平板电脑提供最好中的最好。例如，我们错过了 Tab S9 系列旗舰产品中的超声波指纹传感器，或对一些最新技术标准的支持，如 WiFi 7 或 LTPO 面板。我们还发现，彩色显示屏的调节选项有限，也有一定的改进空间。小米的 Pad 6 Max和 MIUI。

除了 Tab S9 Ultra 之外，联想还推出了一款有趣的替代产品。拥有两个 USB 端口的 Tab Extreme提供了比三星平板电脑更多的灵活性，同时还拥有丰富的可选配件。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

在Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 时，可在三星在线商店购买，起价约 1200 美元。例如，BestBuy 也提供相同价格的产品。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra - 2023-09-22 09/22/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

71 / 70 → 100%

Weight

79 / 40-88 → 82%

Battery

88%

Display

91%

Games Performance

71 / 78 → 91%

Application Performance

93 / 92 → 100%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

90 / 91 → 98%

Camera

65 / 85 → 76%

Average

84%

91%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 评测--出色的平板电脑，惊艳因素弥补了弱点

Marcus Herbrich, 2023-09-23 (Update: 2023-09-23)