Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G评论。11英寸格式中的最大性能

对领导的要求。 三星旨在通过其新的高端平板电脑Galaxy Tab S8 5G将竞争者甩在身后。用装甲铝制成的外壳、高端的骁龙8代SoC、120赫兹的屏幕和三星S Pen只是该制造商提供的一些硬件成分。我们在以下评论中对Galaxy Tab S8 5G进行了测试。
5G Android Tablet Touchscreen

三星通过其Galaxy Tab S8系列承诺在日常生活中提高生产力和创造力。买家可以选择14.6英寸的旗舰机Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra和12.4英寸的 Galaxy Tab S8+.这组中的第三款平板电脑是Galaxy Tab S8,它的11英寸屏幕是最实用的外形因素。

与其姐妹机型一样,Galaxy Tab S8也配备了三星的S Pen,快速的Snapdragon 8 Gen 1,并提供Wi-Fi和5G版本。我们仔细看了一下5G版本,在三星的网上商店,最小的存储配置(128GB)的价格略低于900欧元。256GB版本的价格为950欧元,而Wi-Fi版本的价格则便宜150欧元。

国际读者请注意。Galaxy Tab S8在其他国家也有不同的配置和不同的价格(例子见本评论末尾的 "价格和供应")。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Galaxy Tab S Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
11.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, LCD, WQXGA, 16 Mio. colors, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 97.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Light Sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, Samsung Smart Switch
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (B1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G (N1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78), LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.3 x 253.8 x 165.3
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0) + 5 MPix (f/2.2), videos up to UHD [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, Samsung S Pen, USB cable (type A to C), SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
507 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90.2 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
507 g6.3 mm11.00"2560x1600
91.7 %
03/2022
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1, M1 8-Core GPU
461 g6.1 mm10.90"2360x1640
85.9 %
01/2021
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
485 g5.8 mm11.50"2560x1600
88 %
04/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
572 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
85.8 %
07/2021
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
608 g6.3 mm12.40"2560x1600
88.7 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
515 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600

外壳:高质量的铝和玻璃制成的底盘

三星最小的Galaxy Tab S8平板电脑在外观和感觉方面给人留下了极好的印象,它的缝隙均匀,"无缺口 "的网络摄像头(因为它直接集成在框架中),以及牢牢固定在底盘上的物理按钮。

除了SIM卡插槽和侧面的按钮,机箱是由铠甲铝制成的,这不仅使平板电脑具有507克的低重量,而且还使其具有抗划伤性。如果你愿意,你可以不费吹灰之力就把平板电脑弯曲,但它的坚固程度足以满足日常使用。这种坚固性也适用于Galaxy Tab S8 5G的正面,它受到大猩猩Victus+玻璃的保护。这款平板电脑有三种颜色可供选择。石墨色、银色和粉金色。

附带的三星S Pen以磁力吸附在顶部框架(物理按钮旁边)和背面。后盖上的摄像头正下方有一块区域用于此目的。S笔也在那里进行无线充电。没有提供防水和防尘的IP认证。

尺寸比较

284.8 mm 185 mm 6.3 mm 608 g285 mm 185 mm 5.7 mm 572 g264.28 mm 171.4 mm 5.8 mm 485 g254.69 mm 166.25 mm 6.85 mm 515 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 6.3 mm 507 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 6.1 mm 461 g

连接性。三星S Pen和四扬声器

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G配备了一套广泛的功能。这包括带有Dolby Atmos的四扬声器,带有USB 3.2 Gen.1速度的USB-C端口,以及用高达1TB的microSD卡扩展内部存储的选项。除了所有常见的microSD文件格式外,该平板电脑还支持exFAT文件格式,因此可以保存大于4GB的文件。通过USB也可以进行有线图像输出。

三星在更多方面实现了其对生产力和创造力的承诺,其中S Pen手写笔是最明显的选择。另一项功能使用户能够将Galaxy Book Cover Keyboard连接到下壳一侧,该键盘以磁性方式停靠在那里。屏幕共享通过Miracast进行,并在快速设置栏中的智能视图选项中激活。此外,还有第二屏幕功能,它允许平板电脑作为Windows PC的第二屏幕使用。

左边:扬声器、麦克风
左边:扬声器、麦克风
右边:扬声器,USB-C 3.1 Gen.1
右边:扬声器,USB-C 3.1 Gen.1
顶部:SIM/MicroSD插槽,麦克风,音量摇杆,功能键
顶部:SIM/MicroSD插槽,麦克风,音量摇杆,功能键
底部。Pogo pin连接器
底部。Pogo pin连接器

微型SD卡读卡器

当用我们的Angelbird V60参考卡(读取率高达280 MB/s,写入率高达160 MB/s)进行基准测试时,三星Galaxy Tab S8实现了稳固的传输率,与Galaxy Tab S8+的传输率非常吻合。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
53.8 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
52.6 MB/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40.34 MB/s ∼75% -23%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24.4 MB/s ∼45% -54%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.2 (28.5-49.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.9 (32.7-51)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø80.6 (46.7-90.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.1 (43.7-86.2)

软件:5年的安全更新和三星DeX

三星正在关注Galaxy Tab S8 5G的寿命,承诺将提供多达四代的Android 操作系统升级以及五年的安全更新。目前没有其他制造商在Android 设备领域提供更多的服务。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G运行Android 12和三星4.1版的用户界面OneUI。DeX,也被称为 "Desktop eXperience",为用户提供了第二个用户界面。它在布局和操作方面类似于Windows,在与S Pen和可选的三星书本封面一起使用时,几乎与桌面操作系统一样。该平板电脑可以通过三星智能开关接收来自其他兼容的三星Galaxy 设备的内容。

在测试时(5月中旬),Android 的安全更新是2022年5月的,因此是最新的。另一层安全是以三星Knox Vault平台的形式出现的,它可以保护敏感数据(如密码)免受网络攻击。

通信和GNSS:5G、WiFi 6E和蓝牙5.2

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G使用WiFi 6E,就像更昂贵的Galaxy Tab S8+Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra,这一功能是目前平板电脑领域的主要例外。与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000等支持WiFi 6E的路由器结合使用,在测试中实现了非常快的传输速率,峰值为1802 Mbps。在WiFi 6网络中,数据传输也同样稳定,仍然取得了超过800兆比特/秒的坚实速率。

三星Galaxy Tab S8的5G版本覆盖了广泛的频率范围,有5个3G频段,19个4G频段和13个5G频段,所以应该几乎没有任何接收问题。该平板电脑还支持蓝牙5.2,但不支持NFC。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (829min - 888max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
777 (381min - 863max) MBit/s ∼90%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
645 (630min - 659max) MBit/s ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
630 (597min - 669max) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
827 (708min - 899max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
767 (747min - 777max) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655 (601min - 674max) MBit/s ∼79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
555 (508min - 597max) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
831 (779min - 861max) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
769 (744min - 780max) MBit/s ∼93% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
715 (339min - 767max) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
959 (486min - 977max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
896 (774min - 935max) MBit/s ∼93% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
843 (599min - 944max) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1802 (884min - 1853max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1797 (920min - 1830max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1611 (1577min - 1636max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1598 (1441min - 1641max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1773 (884-1853)
; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1577-1636)
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø702 (339-767)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø843 (599-944)
室内的GPS信号
室内的GPS信号
GPS信号输出
GPS信号输出

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G使用卫星导航服务,从GPS(B1)、Glonass(B1)、北斗(B1、B1C)、伽利略(B1)到QZSS来确定其位置。在测试中,该平板电脑在室内和室外都能确定其当前位置,精确度为3米,而且在这两种情况下定位功能都非常迅速。

在实际使用中,这款平板电脑也能提供准确的导航数据,正如我们短暂的自行车之旅所显示的那样。三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G追踪近10公里的路线,几乎与Garmin Venu 2一样准确。

GNSS试骑:环湖航行
GNSS试骑:环湖航行
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:总结
GNSS试骑:总结

照相机。良好的双摄像头,1300万像素

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Galaxy Tab S8 5G的自拍相机分辨率为1200万像素,在日光下提供非常坚实的图像质量,因此也很适合在自动取景支持下进行视频聊天。在人像模式下,自拍相机具有虚化效果。不幸的是,脸部的边缘没有显示得太明显,因此,主体和背景之间没有明显的分离。

后面是一个双摄像头,由一个F2.0光圈的1300万像素广角传感器和一个600万像素的超广角传感器(F2.2)组成。在日光下,主摄像头拍摄的照片很有吸引力,细节丰富而清晰。在照片实验室里,灰度和颜色的捕捉相当准确。即使只有很少的余光,产生的照片仍然很细致。其他平板电脑就不一样了,比如说小米Pad 5也是如此,它们在这里的表现要差得多。超广角摄像头的质量稍稍落后于主摄像头,因为周边区域相当模糊和嘈杂。

自拍相机和主相机都能以最高4K UHD每秒30帧的速度录制视频,而超广角相机则被限制在30FPS的全高清。与前置摄像头不同,后置双摄像头具有视频稳定功能,并能提供体面的图像质量。然而,用户不能在拍摄过程中切换镜头。

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用广角相机拍照
用广角相机拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G: 6.79 ∆E min: 0.84 - max: 12.86 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
80.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G: 46.31 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 80.85 ∆E

配件和保修。45瓦的电源需要额外费用

购买时,三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G附带三星S Pen、一条USB线(Type C到Type C)、一个SIM卡工具以及快速启动指南和保修信息。进一步的配件,如书套、耳机和智能手表,可以在三星的商店购买。配套的45瓦电源适配器也在那里提供,价格约为50欧元。

在德国,三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G有两年的保修期。三星还通过其Care+套餐提供扩展保护,防止损坏和被盗,其费用可能因地区而异。

输入设备和操作。功能键中的指纹传感器

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G迅速而准确地实现了输入,无论它们是直接在显示屏上还是通过S Pen进行的。由于其高达120赫兹的自适应刷新率,这款平板电脑显示的内容非常流畅,给人的印象是它甚至没有受到任何测试任务的挑战。

S笔可以识别4096个压力级别,因此可以进行非常精确的书写和绘画。要创建笔记或草图,你可以点击显示屏右侧边缘的小笔图标,然后启动笔记应用程序。笔的菜单也可以用来拍摄屏幕截图,并为这些截图配上文字。同时,它还具有快速启动栏的功能,因为你可以将其他应用程序添加到列表中。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G的指纹传感器位于Bixby或功能键中,可以可靠地解锁平板电脑。还可以通过二维人脸识别进行生物认证,这也具有快速的响应时间。

横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘

显示。锐利和色彩准确的TFT屏幕

子像素网格
子像素网格

如果我们以像素密度为基准,Galaxy Tab S8 5G在其2560x1600的TFT屏幕上以274 PPI显示内容,这比 Galaxy Tab S8+(266 PPI)和 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra(239 PPI)。它也比对比设备的平均536cd/m²更亮。可以在显示设置中启用蓝光过滤器,以增加使用的便利性。

通过均匀分布的明暗图像区域(APL18),TFT屏幕实现了552 cd/m²的最大亮度,在禁用亮度传感器的情况下保持在467 cd/m²。在最低的亮度设置下,显示屏仍然以6.78 cd/m²的亮度闪耀(如果在输入设置中启用了额外的调光,则为5.38 cd/m²)。在测试中,我们确实注意到了显示屏的闪烁,但这只在亮度设置为2%或更低时发生,所以在实践中应该不是一个问题。

550
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 559 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 536 cd/m² Minimum: 5.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 551 cd/m²
Contrast: 918:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
91.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
LCD, 2560x1600, 11.00
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.40
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.40
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen
5%
-37%
-50%
-10%
-4%
Brightness middle
551
529
-4%
372
-32%
459
-17%
619
12%
497
-10%
Brightness
536
490
-9%
375
-30%
462
-14%
593
11%
475
-11%
Brightness Distribution
93
86
-8%
95
2%
97
4%
91
-2%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.6
0.37
38%
0.22
63%
0.42
30%
Contrast
918
1430
56%
2814
207%
1183
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.35
4%
1.8
-29%
2.2
-57%
2.6
-86%
1.4
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.6
2.45
56%
4.2
25%
4.9
12%
6.6
-18%
3
46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
2.1
-91%
2.8
-155%
3.6
-227%
4
-264%
2.3
-109%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.183 101%
2.29 96%
2.09 105%
2.17 101%
2.25 98%
CCT
6621 98%
6939 94%
6718 97%
6558 99%
6973 93%
6744 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 62870 Hz ≤ 2 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 62870 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 2 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 62870 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21751 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小的亮度
最小的亮度
25%的亮度
25%
50%的亮度
50%
75%的亮度
75%
最大手动亮度
100%

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示

预设图像模式 "鲜艳 "和 "自然 "可以在显示设置中选择。后者提供最准确的色彩再现,尽管它只涵盖了较小的sRGB色彩空间,而不是DCI-P3色彩空间。自然 "图像模式下的色彩保真度,最大Delta-E为1.4,属于理想范围,色温和RGB平衡也是如此。

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
灰度(配置文件:生动,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
灰度(配置文件:生动,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(配置文件:生动,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(配置文件:生动,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.499 ms rise
↘ 14.63 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.14 ms rise
↘ 26.03 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.7 ms).

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G在户外表现良好。但由于亮度不足,最好在阴凉处使用该平板电脑,以便毫无困难地看到内容。

在阳光直射下的户外使用
在阳光直射下的户外使用
在户外阴凉处使用
在户外阴凉处使用

TFT面板的可视角度稳定性很好。在较平坦的视角下,显示器的亮度略有下降,但可读性仍然很高,色彩再现也没有变化。

视角
视角

性能。配备骁龙8代的三星平板电脑

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G配备了最快的Android SoC,即骁龙8代和它的 阿德雷诺730因此,这款平板电脑轻松地通过了我们的基准测试。在合成基准测试中,它几乎总是处于领先地位,例如在AnTuTu v9中得到927000分。然而,像所有其他配备骁龙8代的平板电脑一样,它被迫向iPad Air 5 2022认输。 Apple iPad Air 5 2022和它的 Apple M1.Android SoC的人工智能计算也不是很好,从其AImark分数中可以看出。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
1719 Points ∼84% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1182 - 1298, n=17)
1234 Points ∼60% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
1226 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
1182 Points ∼58% -4%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1019 Points ∼50% -17%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=44, last 2 years)
703 Points ∼34% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
656 Points ∼32% -46%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
523 Points ∼26% -57%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
7034 Points ∼24% +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=17)
3571 Points ∼12% +9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
3317 Points ∼12% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
3293 Points ∼11% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
3269 Points ∼11%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=44, last 2 years)
2408 Points ∼8% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1885 Points ∼7% -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
1764 Points ∼6% -46%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
1040908 Points ∼88% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (821646 - 1041980, n=14)
946438 Points ∼80% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
927884 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
821646 Points ∼69% -11%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
704209 Points ∼59% -24%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1186706, n=25, last 2 years)
540119 Points ∼46% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
356422 Points ∼30% -62%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
341542 Points ∼29% -63%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
13740 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
13711 Points ∼74% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (12062 - 17025, n=16)
13611 Points ∼73% -1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
11694 Points ∼63% -15%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=24, last 2 years)
8932 Points ∼48% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
8897 Points ∼48% -35%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
1266 Points ∼55% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
1069 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (811 - 1169, n=10)
1030 Points ∼45% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
999 Points ∼43% -7%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 1283, n=13, last 2 years)
834 Points ∼36% -22%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
780 Points ∼34% -27%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
6908 Points ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6007 - 7567, n=11)
6808 Points ∼81% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
6283 Points ∼74% -9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
6139 Points ∼73% -11%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 6908, n=26, last 2 years)
3626 Points ∼43% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
3608 Points ∼43% -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3421 Points ∼40% -50%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
10926 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9273 - 10990, n=11)
10216 Points ∼52% -6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10171 Points ∼52% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
9273 Points ∼47% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
7162 Points ∼36% -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
6753 Points ∼34% -38%
Average of class Tablet (1492 - 10926, n=26, last 2 years)
6456 Points ∼33% -41%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8167 Points ∼90% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
6940 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5125 - 7806, n=11)
6493 Points ∼72% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
5739 Points ∼63% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4637 Points ∼51% -33%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
4053 Points ∼45% -42%
Average of class Tablet (675 - 8167, n=26, last 2 years)
4014 Points ∼44% -42%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
22283 Points ∼77% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (15216 - 22308, n=11)
20142 Points ∼70% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
18998 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
12118 Points ∼42% -36%
Average of class Tablet (542 - 22308, n=26, last 2 years)
6886 Points ∼24% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4022 Points ∼14% -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3875 Points ∼13% -80%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1291 - 1888, n=11)
1624 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
1581 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1411 Points ∼59% -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
1291 Points ∼54% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
1291 Points ∼54% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1283 Points ∼54% -19%
Average of class Tablet (772 - 1581, n=26, last 2 years)
1235 Points ∼52% -22%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
118331 Points ∼41% +1832%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
45392 Points ∼16% +641%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
34522 Points ∼12% +464%
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=23, last 2 years)
30230 Points ∼11% +394%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5783 - 96317, n=11)
20508 Points ∼7% +235%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
6124 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
5783 Points ∼2% -6%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
Points ∼0% -100%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Qualcomm Adreno 618, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G也被证明是GPU重度测试中最快的Android 平板电脑之一。特别是在GFXBench中,它可以充分挖掘其120赫兹屏幕的潜力。Apple iPad Air 5 2022在3DMark Wild Life中仍然表现得更好一些。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
4144 Points ∼100% +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2493 Points ∼60% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2205 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1235 Points ∼30% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
334 Points ∼8% -85%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
4913 Points ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2473 Points ∼50% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2287 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1228 Points ∼25% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
330 Points ∼7% -86%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
18309 Points ∼100% +102%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9052 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8798 Points ∼48% -3%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4290 Points ∼23% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1099 Points ∼6% -88%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
637 Points ∼3% -93%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
10018 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8859 Points ∼88% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8630 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4273 Points ∼43% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1101 Points ∼11% -87%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
736 Points ∼7% -91%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10486 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10215 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9728 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9728 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4058 Points ∼39% -60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3668 Points ∼35% -64%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20770 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17283 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17283 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14054 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4283 Points ∼21% -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3756 Points ∼18% -82%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5552 Points ∼100% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3728 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3728 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3676 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3578 Points ∼64% -3%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3390 Points ∼61% -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8945 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8844 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8374 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2938 Points ∼33% -67%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2626 Points ∼29% -71%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14871 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13039 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10563 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2738 Points ∼18% -82%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2469 Points ∼17% -83%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5634 Points ∼100% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3735 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3728 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3523 Points ∼63% -6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3380 Points ∼60% -10%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼99% -1%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
55 fps ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44 fps ∼37% -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
557 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
334 fps ∼60% -12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
229 fps ∼41% -40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
85 fps ∼15% -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps ∼10% -86%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps ∼70% -30%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼52% -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
25 fps ∼22% -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼22% -78%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
317 fps ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
209 fps ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
163 fps ∼51% -22%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
137 fps ∼43% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼14% -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
42 fps ∼13% -80%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps ∼57% -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16 fps ∼18% -82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼18% -82%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
229 fps ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
146 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼53% -17%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps ∼42% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps ∼14% -78%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
30 fps ∼13% -79%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps ∼72% -9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼52% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.8 fps ∼16% -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
9.7 fps ∼16% -79%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
153.5 fps ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps ∼47% -13%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼38% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps ∼12% -78%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
17 fps ∼11% -80%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps ∼53% -6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps ∼35% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.7 fps ∼11% -80%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6.5 fps ∼11% -81%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60.9 fps ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps ∼61% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps ∼38% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.3 fps ∼12% -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6.6 fps ∼11% -81%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼73% -12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼55% -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
10 fps ∼17% -80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼17% -80%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
149 fps ∼100% +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps ∼62% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼40% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼13% -78%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16 fps ∼11% -82%

Galaxy Tab S8 5G在浏览器性能方面也处于领先地位。网站的加载速度非常快,在测试中没有出现延迟或其他意外停顿。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
184.3 Points ∼100% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)
121.695 Points ∼66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (77.3 - 126.3, n=12)
105.3 Points ∼57% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
95.424 Points ∼52% -22%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
80 Points ∼43% -34%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 184.3, n=34, last 2 years)
79.1 Points ∼43% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
55.3 Points ∼30% -55%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
47.58 Points ∼26% -61%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
435.6 Points ∼100% +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)
231.41 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
206.89 Points ∼47% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
206.89 Points ∼47% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)
195.6 Points ∼45% -15%
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=38, last 2 years)
147 Points ∼34% -36%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
134.7 Points ∼31% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
93.4 Points ∼21% -60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
84.4 Points ∼19% -64%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
254 Points ∼100% +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)
155 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
151 Points ∼59% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (101 - 193, n=11)
148.2 Points ∼58% -4%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
121 Points ∼48% -22%
Average of class Tablet (24 - 254, n=39, last 2 years)
103.3 Points ∼41% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
83 Points ∼33% -46%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
67 Points ∼26% -57%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
255 runs/min ∼100% +120%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)
116 runs/min ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=12)
104.5 runs/min ∼41% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
99.7 runs/min ∼39% -14%
Average of class Tablet (12.6 - 255, n=32, last 2 years)
84.4 runs/min ∼33% -27%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
68.9 runs/min ∼27% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
43.09 runs/min ∼17% -63%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
41.4 runs/min ∼16% -64%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
66974 Points ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)
48205 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
41829 Points ∼62% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=13)
41274 Points ∼62% -14%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
30367 Points ∼45% -37%
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=38, last 2 years)
25916 Points ∼39% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
17823 Points ∼27% -63%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
16476 Points ∼25% -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=40, last 2 years)
3492 ms * ∼100% -304%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
2888 ms * ∼83% -234%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
2403 ms * ∼69% -178%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1447 ms * ∼41% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (819 - 1440, n=12)
1033 ms * ∼30% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
936.3 ms * ∼27% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)
864.6 ms * ∼25%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
499 ms * ∼14% +42%

* ... smaller is better

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的UFS 3.1设备确保了短的加载时间。4K的随机读/写甚至高于平均水平。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GLenovo Tab P11 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5GSamsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5GXiaomi Pad 5 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-62%
3%
-39%
2%
-10%
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
1517.98
486.8
-68%
1726.34
14%
861
-43%
1684
11%
1572 ?(1030 - 1898, n=35)
4%
714 ?(123.3 - 2031, n=37, last 2 years)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
1026.82
192.3
-81%
1374.65
34%
512
-50%
772
-25%
759 ?(233 - 1095, n=35)
-26%
381 ?(87.2 - 1559, n=37, last 2 years)
-63%
Random Read 4KB
263.23
136.3
-48%
202.35
-23%
192
-27%
289.3
10%
234 ?(126.2 - 322, n=35)
-11%
123.2 ?(10.1 - 310, n=37, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Write 4KB
256.83
123.3
-52%
218.02
-15%
167.5
-35%
281.5
10%
235 ?(121.4 - 323, n=35)
-8%
110.5 ?(4.27 - 370, n=37, last 2 years)
-57%
AndroBench 3-5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB
1517.98 MB/s ∼88%
Sequential Write 256KB
1026.82 MB/s ∼75%
Random Read 4KB
263.23 MB/s ∼91%
Random Write 4KB
256.83 MB/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB
1726.34 MB/s ∼100%
Sequential Write 256KB
1374.65 MB/s ∼100%
Random Read 4KB
202.35 MB/s ∼70%
Random Write 4KB
218.02 MB/s ∼77%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB
1684 MB/s ∼98%
Sequential Write 256KB
772 MB/s ∼56%
Random Read 4KB
289.3 MB/s ∼100%
Random Write 4KB
281.5 MB/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB
861 MB/s ∼50%
Sequential Write 256KB
512 MB/s ∼37%
Random Read 4KB
192 MB/s ∼66%
Random Write 4KB
167.5 MB/s ∼60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB
486.8 MB/s ∼28%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.3 MB/s ∼14%
Random Read 4KB
136.3 MB/s ∼47%
Random Write 4KB
123.3 MB/s ∼44%
Average of class Tablet
 
Sequential Read 256KB
714 (min: 123.3) MB/s ∼41%
Sequential Write 256KB
381 (min: 87.2) MB/s ∼28%
Random Read 4KB
123.2 (min: 10.1) MB/s ∼43%
Random Write 4KB
110.5 (min: 4.27) MB/s ∼39%

游戏。强大的游戏平台

骁龙8代1,四个扬声器和120赫兹的屏幕使Galaxy Tab S8 5G成为一个强大的游戏机。我们用Gamebench工具确定了测试游戏的帧率。工具确定的测试游戏,都运行得非常流畅,并伴有强烈的环绕声。

然而,这款平板电脑在游戏中不能完全利用120赫兹屏幕的优势。在Armajet和PUBG Mobile(图形设置为HD/High)中,每秒超过60帧是不可能的。该 Galaxy Tab S8+Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra在这里偶尔会达到明显更高的FPS数字。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60 (58-61)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.9.0: Ø30 (29-31)

排放。强大的环绕声

温度

在运行中,Galaxy Tab S8 5G即使在持续的负载下也能保持在30℃以下,因此不会出现不舒服的温度。因为一个 骁龙8代1由于该平板电脑使用了骁龙8代,节流几乎是不可避免的。不过,由于外壳较大,负载下出现的节流现象并不像许多配备相同SoC的智能手机那样明显。此外,由于仍有如此多的剩余功率可供利用,用户在正常使用下不会注意到节流。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.1 (37.3-50)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.5 (35-55.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.9 (10.2-13.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.8 (9.93-14.9)
Max. Load
 30.5 °C30.1 °C30 °C 
 30.3 °C29.2 °C29.4 °C 
 26.1 °C25.8 °C27.3 °C 
Maximum: 30.5 °C
Average: 28.7 °C
29.1 °C29.2 °C31.1 °C
29.2 °C29.1 °C29.7 °C
25.5 °C26.3 °C26 °C
Maximum: 31.1 °C
Average: 28.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.

发言人

Galaxy Tab S8 5G的两个窄边上共有四个Dolby Atmos扬声器,可播放高达89.4 dB(A)的声音,产生强大的声音,中音和高音非常平衡。虽然低音调有些欠缺,但在声音组合中仍比许多其他平板电脑明显得多。

由于Galaxy Tab S8 5G缺乏3.5毫米插孔,有线音频设备(如耳机)必须通过USB-C适配器连接,而三星并没有在其平板电脑中包含这个适配器。蓝牙音频编解码器AAC、aptX、LDAC和SBC可用于通过蓝牙5.2进行音频输出,这是一个有点稀疏的选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.437.5252832.53132.626.34027.729.7503445.1632730.58023.635.510022.341.512517.748.416016.159.220012.859.625013.163.23151267.9400968.1500117363010.77480010.376.4100010.978.6125012.175.6160011.871.820001268.7250011.874.7315011.980.8400012.982.9500013.379.1630013.473.1800013.577.21000013.674.81250014.862.71600014.158.1SPL24.689.4N0.682.2median 12.8median 73Delta1.16.626.926.621.921.521.923.619.823.621.619.92321.723.126.622.540.520.452.924.656.515.859.214.158.115.961.518.265.715.564.311.565.810.166.99.568.89.770.710.271.910.871.910.975.611.276.211.578.111.772.711.867.511.864.2126511.466.810.558.424.184.80.557.9median 11.7median 65.82.85.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GApple iPad Air 5 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理。Galaxy Tab S8拥有最佳的电池寿命

消耗功率

三星Galaxy Tab S8系列中最小的平板电脑也有最小的电池:8000毫安时的电池,可以用最大的45瓦特充电。相应的电源适配器只需支付附加费用,在三星网络商店的价格约为50欧元(其他地区的货币价格可能略有不同)。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G在耗电方面受到限制。与对比设备相比,它的耗电量明显较低,尤其是在空转时,因此更加平衡。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.07 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.19 / 4.38 / 4.45 Watt
Load midlight 7.85 / 6.67 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
8600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
10090 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Power Consumption
-62%
-3%
-35%
-26%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
1.19
1.65
-39%
1.55
-30%
3.08
-159%
1.06
11%
1.14
4%
Idle Average *
4.38
8.1
-85%
4.91
-12%
3.69
16%
6.25
-43%
4.3
2%
Idle Maximum *
4.45
9.4
-111%
5.02
-13%
3.76
16%
6.3
-42%
4.31
3%
Load Average *
7.85
9.5
-21%
4.38
44%
7.72
2%
8.76
-12%
8.09
-3%
Load Maximum *
6.67
10.4
-56%
6.81
-2%
9.87
-48%
9.54
-43%
10.32
-55%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.61 (2.12-13.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø8.51 (3.67-15)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.97 (6.63-14.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (13.2-15.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø2.14 (2.07-3.63)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø3.42 (3.31-4.05)

电池寿命

Galaxy Tab S8 5G对其8000毫安时的电池进行了最佳利用,因为它的电池运行时间比其姐妹机型Tab S8+要长得多。Galaxy Tab S8+Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra。两者都有更大的电池(10090和11220毫安时),但它们也必须为大得多的显示屏供电。

总的来说,Galaxy Tab S8 5G的运行时间比其他Galaxy Tab S8机型长约三分之一,在模拟网络浏览时持续约16小时,在播放视频时持续近14小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 10min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 31min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
8600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
10090 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-30%
-13%
-38%
19%
8%
Reader / Idle
2170
1641
-24%
846
-61%
2485
15%
3013
39%
H.264
831
851
2%
607
-27%
1249
50%
1009
21%
WiFi v1.3
966
646
-33%
624
-35%
437
-55%
1020
6%
921
-5%
Load
331
245
-26%
348
5%
309
-7%
342
3%
255
-23%

Pros

+ 120赫兹面板
+ 高质量的做工
+ 更新保证
+ 快速的WiFi 6E
+ 直观的笔输入
+ 用于键盘的对接端口
+ 性能非常稳固
+ 四个Dolby Atmos扬声器
+ 电池运行时间长

Cons

- 不包括电源适配器
- 用于蓝牙的音频编解码器很少
- 没有OLED屏幕
- 部分游戏帧率低

对三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的评价

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的回顾。测试设备由以下单位提供
三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的回顾。测试设备由以下单位提供

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G是市场上最好的Android 平板电脑之一。它只有11英寸,是Galaxy Tab S8系列中最小的平板电脑,但除了外形和显示屏外,它与更大、更昂贵的Galaxy Tab S8+Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 的区别少得令人惊讶。

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G采用了相同的摄像头,并有三星未来更新的承诺(4年的操作系统升级,5年的安全更新),使用相同的高端SoC与Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 ,并支持高达45瓦的快速充电。此外,还有直观的三星S笔,正如三星所承诺的那样,它可以将Android 平板电脑变成一个创意站。三星的DeX桌面模式可以通过可选的对接键盘得到充分的利用。

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G拥有强大的性能和功能,是目前最好的Android 片之一。

就物理尺寸而言,三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G是三款Galaxy Tab S8平板电脑中最实用的一款,也实现了最长的电池运行时间。仅这一点就应该吸引大多数买家。另一个积极的方面是,Galaxy Tab S8 5G是一款支持HDR10的平板电脑,具有120赫兹。然而,与它的姐妹机型不同,它使用的是TFT而不是OLED面板。颜色不是很鲜艳,但就整体图像质量而言,没有什么可抱怨的。这也适用于亮度,Galaxy Tab S8+和Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra的亮度大致相同。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G只有几个缺点。TFT面板肯定可以更亮,而且考虑到购买价格,可以包括一个电源。更多的蓝牙编解码器也会对该平板电脑有利。

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的替代产品有,例如 Apple iPad Air 5 2022联想Tab P11 Pro,它们更便宜,性能基准和功能相似。在产品支持方面,Apple'的iPad Air 5 2022也比三星