三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G评论。11英寸格式中的最大性能

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G
Brand: Samsung

对领导的要求。 三星旨在通过其新的高端平板电脑Galaxy Tab S8 5G将竞争者甩在身后。用装甲铝制成的外壳、高端的骁龙8代SoC、120赫兹的屏幕和三星S Pen只是该制造商提供的一些硬件成分。我们在以下评论中对Galaxy Tab S8 5G进行了测试。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/04/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Tablet Touchscreen

三星通过其Galaxy Tab S8系列承诺在日常生活中提高生产力和创造力。买家可以选择14.6英寸的旗舰机Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra和12.4英寸的 Galaxy Tab S8+.这组中的第三款平板电脑是Galaxy Tab S8，它的11英寸屏幕是最实用的外形因素。

与其姐妹机型一样，Galaxy Tab S8也配备了三星的S Pen，快速的Snapdragon 8 Gen 1，并提供Wi-Fi和5G版本。我们仔细看了一下5G版本，在三星的网上商店，最小的存储配置（128GB）的价格略低于900欧元。256GB版本的价格为950欧元，而Wi-Fi版本的价格则便宜150欧元。

国际读者请注意。Galaxy Tab S8在其他国家也有不同的配置和不同的价格（例子见本评论末尾的 "价格和供应"）。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Galaxy Tab S9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

11.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, LCD, WQXGA, 16 Mio. colors, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 97.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Light Sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, Samsung Smart Switch

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (B1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G (N1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78), LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.3 x 253.8 x 165.3

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0) + 5 MPix (f/2.2), videos up to UHD 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4)

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, Samsung S Pen, USB cable (type A to C), SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

507 g

Price

899 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
90.2 %	06/2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	507 g	6.3 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
91.7 %	03/2022	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1, M1 8-Core GPU	461 g	6.1 mm	10.90"	2360x1640
86.2 %	01/2021	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618	485 g	5.8 mm	11.50"	2560x1600
88.3 %	04/2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	572 g	5.7 mm	12.40"	2800x1752
85.8 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619	608 g	6.3 mm	12.40"	2560x1600
88.7 %	11/2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650	515 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600

外壳：高质量的铝和玻璃制成的底盘

三星最小的Galaxy Tab S8平板电脑在外观和感觉方面给人留下了极好的印象，它的缝隙均匀，"无缺口 "的网络摄像头（因为它直接集成在框架中），以及牢牢固定在底盘上的物理按钮。

除了SIM卡插槽和侧面的按钮，机箱是由铠甲铝制成的，这不仅使平板电脑具有507克的低重量，而且还使其具有抗划伤性。如果你愿意，你可以不费吹灰之力就把平板电脑弯曲，但它的坚固程度足以满足日常使用。这种坚固性也适用于Galaxy Tab S8 5G的正面，它受到大猩猩Victus+玻璃的保护。这款平板电脑有三种颜色可供选择。石墨色、银色和粉金色。

附带的三星S Pen以磁力吸附在顶部框架（物理按钮旁边）和背面。后盖上的摄像头正下方有一块区域用于此目的。S笔也在那里进行无线充电。没有提供防水和防尘的IP认证。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Apple iPad Air 5 2022 DIN A4 ❌

连接性。三星S Pen和四扬声器

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G配备了一套广泛的功能。这包括带有Dolby Atmos的四扬声器，带有USB 3.2 Gen.1速度的USB-C端口，以及用高达1TB的microSD卡扩展内部存储的选项。除了所有常见的microSD文件格式外，该平板电脑还支持exFAT文件格式，因此可以保存大于4GB的文件。通过USB也可以进行有线图像输出。

三星在更多方面实现了其对生产力和创造力的承诺，其中S Pen手写笔是最明显的选择。另一项功能使用户能够将Galaxy Book Cover Keyboard连接到下壳一侧，该键盘以磁性方式停靠在那里。屏幕共享通过Miracast进行，并在快速设置栏中的智能视图选项中激活。此外，还有第二屏幕功能，它允许平板电脑作为Windows PC的第二屏幕使用。

微型SD卡读卡器

当用我们的Angelbird V60参考卡（读取率高达280 MB/s，写入率高达160 MB/s）进行基准测试时，三星Galaxy Tab S8实现了稳固的传输率，与Galaxy Tab S8+的传输率非常吻合。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	53.8 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	52.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	40.34 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	24.4 MB/s -54%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.2 (28.5-49.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.9 (32.7-51)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø80.6 (46.7-90.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.1 (43.7-86.2)

软件：5年的安全更新和三星DeX

三星正在关注Galaxy Tab S8 5G的寿命，承诺将提供多达四代的Android 操作系统升级以及五年的安全更新。目前没有其他制造商在Android 设备领域提供更多的服务。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G运行Android 12和三星4.1版的用户界面OneUI。DeX，也被称为 "Desktop eXperience"，为用户提供了第二个用户界面。它在布局和操作方面类似于Windows，在与S Pen和可选的三星书本封面一起使用时，几乎与桌面操作系统一样。该平板电脑可以通过三星智能开关接收来自其他兼容的三星Galaxy 设备的内容。

在测试时（5月中旬），Android 的安全更新是2022年5月的，因此是最新的。另一层安全是以三星Knox Vault平台的形式出现的，它可以保护敏感数据（如密码）免受网络攻击。

通信和GNSS：5G、WiFi 6E和蓝牙5.2

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G使用WiFi 6E，就像更昂贵的Galaxy Tab S8+和 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra，这一功能是目前平板电脑领域的主要例外。与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000等支持WiFi 6E的路由器结合使用，在测试中实现了非常快的传输速率，峰值为1802 Mbps。在WiFi 6网络中，数据传输也同样稳定，仍然取得了超过800兆比特/秒的坚实速率。

三星Galaxy Tab S8的5G版本覆盖了广泛的频率范围，有5个3G频段，19个4G频段和13个5G频段，所以应该几乎没有任何接收问题。该平板电脑还支持蓝牙5.2，但不支持NFC。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	864 (829^min - 888^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	777 (381^min - 863^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	645 (630^min - 659^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	630 (597^min - 669^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	827 (708^min - 899^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	767 (747^min - 777^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	655 (601^min - 674^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	555 (508^min - 597^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	831 (779^min - 861^max) MBit/s +16%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	769 (744^min - 780^max) MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	715 (339^min - 767^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	959 (486^min - 977^max) MBit/s +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	896 (774^min - 935^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	843 (599^min - 944^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1802 (884^min - 1853^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1797 (920^min - 1830^max) MBit/s 0%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1611 (1577^min - 1636^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1598 (1441^min - 1641^max) MBit/s -1%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1773 (884-1853)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1577-1636)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø702 (339-767)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø843 (599-944)

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G使用卫星导航服务，从GPS（B1）、Glonass（B1）、北斗（B1、B1C）、伽利略（B1）到QZSS来确定其位置。在测试中，该平板电脑在室内和室外都能确定其当前位置，精确度为3米，而且在这两种情况下定位功能都非常迅速。

在实际使用中，这款平板电脑也能提供准确的导航数据，正如我们短暂的自行车之旅所显示的那样。三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G追踪近10公里的路线，几乎与Garmin Venu 2一样准确。

照相机。良好的双摄像头，1300万像素

Galaxy Tab S8 5G的自拍相机分辨率为1200万像素，在日光下提供非常坚实的图像质量，因此也很适合在自动取景支持下进行视频聊天。在人像模式下，自拍相机具有虚化效果。不幸的是，脸部的边缘没有显示得太明显，因此，主体和背景之间没有明显的分离。

后面是一个双摄像头，由一个F2.0光圈的1300万像素广角传感器和一个600万像素的超广角传感器（F2.2）组成。在日光下，主摄像头拍摄的照片很有吸引力，细节丰富而清晰。在照片实验室里，灰度和颜色的捕捉相当准确。即使只有很少的余光，产生的照片仍然很细致。其他平板电脑就不一样了，比如说小米Pad 5也是如此，它们在这里的表现要差得多。超广角摄像头的质量稍稍落后于主摄像头，因为周边区域相当模糊和嘈杂。

自拍相机和主相机都能以最高4K UHD每秒30帧的速度录制视频，而超广角相机则被限制在30FPS的全高清。与前置摄像头不同，后置双摄像头具有视频稳定功能，并能提供体面的图像质量。然而，用户不能在拍摄过程中切换镜头。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

Xiaomi Pad 5

Apple iPad 2021

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

Xiaomi Pad 5

Apple iPad 2021

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

Oppo Find X5 Pro

Google Pixel 6 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

Xiaomi Pad 5

Apple iPad 2021

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

Xiaomi Pad 5

Apple iPad 2021

Canon EOS 90D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G: 6.79 ∆E min: 0.84 - max: 12.86 ∆E

配件和保修。45瓦的电源需要额外费用

购买时，三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G附带三星S Pen、一条USB线（Type C到Type C）、一个SIM卡工具以及快速启动指南和保修信息。进一步的配件，如书套、耳机和智能手表，可以在三星的商店购买。配套的45瓦电源适配器也在那里提供，价格约为50欧元。

在德国，三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G有两年的保修期。三星还通过其Care+套餐提供扩展保护，防止损坏和被盗，其费用可能因地区而异。

输入设备和操作。功能键中的指纹传感器

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G迅速而准确地实现了输入，无论它们是直接在显示屏上还是通过S Pen进行的。由于其高达120赫兹的自适应刷新率，这款平板电脑显示的内容非常流畅，给人的印象是它甚至没有受到任何测试任务的挑战。

S笔可以识别4096个压力级别，因此可以进行非常精确的书写和绘画。要创建笔记或草图，你可以点击显示屏右侧边缘的小笔图标，然后启动笔记应用程序。笔的菜单也可以用来拍摄屏幕截图，并为这些截图配上文字。同时，它还具有快速启动栏的功能，因为你可以将其他应用程序添加到列表中。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G的指纹传感器位于Bixby或功能键中，可以可靠地解锁平板电脑。还可以通过二维人脸识别进行生物认证，这也具有快速的响应时间。

显示。锐利和色彩准确的TFT屏幕

如果我们以像素密度为基准，Galaxy Tab S8 5G在其2560x1600的TFT屏幕上以274 PPI显示内容，这比 Galaxy Tab S8+(266 PPI)和 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra(239 PPI)。它也比对比设备的平均536cd/m²更亮。可以在显示设置中启用蓝光过滤器，以增加使用的便利性。

通过均匀分布的明暗图像区域（APL18），TFT屏幕实现了552 cd/m²的最大亮度，在禁用亮度传感器的情况下保持在467 cd/m²。在最低的亮度设置下，显示屏仍然以6.78 cd/m²的亮度闪耀（如果在输入设置中启用了额外的调光，则为5.38 cd/m²）。在测试中，我们确实注意到了显示屏的闪烁，但这只在亮度设置为2%或更低时发生，所以在实践中应该不是一个问题。


550 cd/m²	559 cd/m²	524 cd/m²
538 cd/m²	551 cd/m²	521 cd/m²
528 cd/m²	531 cd/m²	522 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 559 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 536 cd/m² Minimum: 5.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 551 cd/m²
Contrast: 918:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G LCD, 2560x1600, 11.00	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.40	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.40	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen		5%	-37%	-50%	-10%	-4%
Brightness middle	551	529 -4%	372 -32%	459 -17%	619 12%	497 -10%
Brightness	536	490 -9%	375 -30%	462 -14%	593 11%	475 -11%
Brightness Distribution	93	86 -8%	95 2%	97 4%	91 -2%	89 -4%
Black Level *	0.6	0.37 38%			0.22 63%	0.42 30%
Contrast	918	1430 56%			2814 207%	1183 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	1.35 4%	1.8 -29%	2.2 -57%	2.6 -86%	1.4 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.6	2.45 56%	4.2 25%	4.9 12%	6.6 -18%	3 46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.1	2.1 -91%	2.8 -155%	3.6 -227%	4 -264%	2.3 -109%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.183 ^101%	2.29 ^96%	2.09 ^105%	2.17 ^101%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6621 ^98%	6939 ^94%	6718 ^97%	6558 ^99%	6973 ^93%	6744 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

62870 Hz

≤ 2 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 62870 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 2 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 62870 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示

预设图像模式 "鲜艳 "和 "自然 "可以在显示设置中选择。后者提供最准确的色彩再现，尽管它只涵盖了较小的sRGB色彩空间，而不是DCI-P3色彩空间。自然 "图像模式下的色彩保真度，最大Delta-E为1.4，属于理想范围，色温和RGB平衡也是如此。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.499 ms rise
10.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.63 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.14 ms rise
47.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.03 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G在户外表现良好。但由于亮度不足，最好在阴凉处使用该平板电脑，以便毫无困难地看到内容。

TFT面板的可视角度稳定性很好。在较平坦的视角下，显示器的亮度略有下降，但可读性仍然很高，色彩再现也没有变化。

性能。配备骁龙8代的三星平板电脑

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G配备了最快的Android SoC，即骁龙8代和它的阿德雷诺730因此，这款平板电脑轻松地通过了我们的基准测试。在合成基准测试中，它几乎总是处于领先地位，例如在AnTuTu v9中得到927000分。然而，像所有其他配备骁龙8代的平板电脑一样，它被迫向iPad Air 5 2022认输。 Apple iPad Air 5 2022和它的 Apple M1.Android SoC的人工智能计算也不是很好，从其AImark分数中可以看出。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1719 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1181 - 1298, n=21)	1231 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1226 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	1182 Points -4%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	1019 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	656 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	523 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	7034 Points +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=21)	3548 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	3317 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	3293 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	3269 Points
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	1885 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	1764 Points -46%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1040908 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (692924 - 1041980, n=18)	928953 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	927884 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	821646 Points -11%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	704209 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	356422 Points -62%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	341542 Points -63%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	13740 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	13711 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (10140 - 17025, n=21)	13216 Points -4%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	11694 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	8897 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points -36%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1266 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1069 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	999 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (749 - 1169, n=14)	993 Points -7%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	780 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points -37%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6007 - 7665, n=15)	6951 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6908 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	6283 Points -9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	6139 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	3608 Points -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3421 Points -50%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	10926 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9273 - 11338, n=15)	10312 Points -6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	10171 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	9273 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	7162 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	6753 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points -40%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	8167 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6940 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5125 - 8906, n=15)	6787 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	5739 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	4637 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	4053 Points -42%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	22283 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (15216 - 22308, n=15)	20338 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	18998 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	12118 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	4022 Points -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3875 Points -80%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1291 - 1888, n=15)	1659 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1581 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	1411 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	1291 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	1291 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	1283 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points -24%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	118331 Points +1832%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	45392 Points +641%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	34522 Points +464%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1046 - 96317, n=14)	17097 Points +179%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6124 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	5783 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 6865, n=6, last 2 years)	5427 Points -11%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	Points -100%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 64 GB SSD

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Qualcomm Adreno 618, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

Average of class Tablet

三星的Galaxy Tab S8 5G也被证明是GPU重度测试中最快的Android 平板电脑之一。特别是在GFXBench中，它可以充分挖掘其120赫兹屏幕的潜力。Apple iPad Air 5 2022在3DMark Wild Life中仍然表现得更好一些。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4144 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2493 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2205 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1235 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	334 Points -85%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4913 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2473 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2287 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1228 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	330 Points -86%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	18309 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9052 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8798 Points -3%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4290 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1099 Points -88%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	637 Points -93%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	10018 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8859 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8630 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4273 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1101 Points -87%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	736 Points -91%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10486 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10215 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9728 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9728 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4058 Points -60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3668 Points -64%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20770 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17283 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17283 Points -17%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14054 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4283 Points -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3756 Points -82%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5552 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3728 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3728 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3676 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3578 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3390 Points -8%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8945 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8844 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8374 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2938 Points -67%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2626 Points -71%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14871 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13039 Points -12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10563 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2738 Points -82%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2469 Points -83%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5634 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3735 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3728 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3523 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3380 Points -10%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -50%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	55 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	44 fps -63%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	557 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	381 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	334 fps -12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	229 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	85 fps -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	55 fps -86%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -22%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -30%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	25 fps -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	25 fps -78%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	209 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	163 fps -22%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	137 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	43 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	42 fps -80%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -33%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	16 fps -82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps -82%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	229 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	146 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps -17%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	32 fps -78%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	30 fps -79%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	9.8 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	9.7 fps -79%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	153.5 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -13%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps -78%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	17 fps -80%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.7 fps -80%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.5 fps -81%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60.9 fps +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.3 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.6 fps -81%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	10 fps -80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps -80%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	149 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps -78%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	16 fps -82%

Galaxy Tab S8 5G在浏览器性能方面也处于领先地位。网站的加载速度非常快，在测试中没有出现延迟或其他意外停顿。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	184.3 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	121.695 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)	107.9 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	95.424 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points -30%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	80 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	55.3 Points -55%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	47.58 Points -61%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	435.6 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	231.41 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	206.89 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	206.89 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)	195.6 Points -15%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	134.7 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	93.4 Points -60%
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)	85.4 Points -63%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	84.4 Points -64%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	254 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	155 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	151 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)	142.9 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	121 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	83 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	67 Points -57%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	255 runs/min +120%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	116 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)	104 runs/min -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	99.7 runs/min -14%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min -33%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	68.9 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	43.09 runs/min -63%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	41.4 runs/min -64%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	66974 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	48205 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)	42391 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	41829 Points -13%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	30367 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	17823 Points -63%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	16476 Points -66%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -271%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	2888 ms * -234%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	2403 ms * -178%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	1447 ms * -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)	1010 ms * -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	936.3 ms * -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	864.6 ms *
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	499 ms * +42%

* ... smaller is better

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的UFS 3.1设备确保了短的加载时间。4K的随机读/写甚至高于平均水平。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-62%	3%	-39%	2%	-8%	-43%
Sequential Read 256KB	1517.98	486.8 -68%	1726.34 14%	861 -43%	1684 11%	1599 ?(1030 - 3134, n=56) 5%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) -44%
Sequential Write 256KB	1026.82	192.3 -81%	1374.65 34%	512 -50%	772 -25%	777 ?(233 - 1332, n=56) -24%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) -48%
Random Read 4KB	263.23	136.3 -48%	202.35 -23%	192 -27%	289.3 10%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=56) -7%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	256.83	123.3 -52%	218.02 -15%	167.5 -35%	281.5 10%	245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=56) -5%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -41%

AndroBench 3-5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB	1517.98 MB/s ∼88%
Sequential Write 256KB	1026.82 MB/s ∼75%
Random Read 4KB	263.23 MB/s ∼91%
Random Write 4KB	256.83 MB/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB	1726.34 MB/s ∼100%
Sequential Write 256KB	1374.65 MB/s ∼100%
Random Read 4KB	202.35 MB/s ∼70%
Random Write 4KB	218.02 MB/s ∼77%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB	1684 MB/s ∼98%
Sequential Write 256KB	772 MB/s ∼56%
Random Read 4KB	289.3 MB/s ∼100%
Random Write 4KB	281.5 MB/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB	861 MB/s ∼50%
Sequential Write 256KB	512 MB/s ∼37%
Random Read 4KB	192 MB/s ∼66%
Random Write 4KB	167.5 MB/s ∼60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Sequential Read 256KB	486.8 MB/s ∼28%
Sequential Write 256KB	192.3 MB/s ∼14%
Random Read 4KB	136.3 MB/s ∼47%
Random Write 4KB	123.3 MB/s ∼44%
Average of class Tablet
Sequential Read 256KB	850 (min: 163) MB/s ∼49%
Sequential Write 256KB	532 (min: 78.2) MB/s ∼39%
Random Read 4KB	167 (min: 18.4) MB/s ∼58%
Random Write 4KB	150.8 (min: 8.23) MB/s ∼54%

游戏。强大的游戏平台

的骁龙8代1，四个扬声器和120赫兹的屏幕使Galaxy Tab S8 5G成为一个强大的游戏机。我们用Gamebench工具确定了测试游戏的帧率。工具确定的测试游戏，都运行得非常流畅，并伴有强烈的环绕声。

然而，这款平板电脑在游戏中不能完全利用120赫兹屏幕的优势。在Armajet和PUBG Mobile（图形设置为HD/High）中，每秒超过60帧是不可能的。该 Galaxy Tab S8+和 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra在这里偶尔会达到明显更高的FPS数字。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60 (58-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G; PUBG Mobile; 1.9.0: Ø30 (29-31)

排放。强大的环绕声

温度

在运行中，Galaxy Tab S8 5G即使在持续的负载下也能保持在30℃以下，因此不会出现不舒服的温度。因为一个骁龙8代1由于该平板电脑使用了骁龙8代，节流几乎是不可避免的。不过，由于外壳较大，负载下出现的节流现象并不像许多配备相同SoC的智能手机那样明显。此外，由于仍有如此多的剩余功率可供利用，用户在正常使用下不会注意到节流。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.1 (37.3-50)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.5 (35-55.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.9 (10.2-13.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.8 (9.93-14.9)

Max. Load

Idle


30.5 °C	30.1 °C	30 °C
30.3 °C	29.2 °C	29.4 °C
26.1 °C	25.8 °C	27.3 °C

Maximum: 30.5 °C
Average: 28.7 °C


29.1 °C	29.2 °C	31.1 °C
29.2 °C	29.1 °C	29.7 °C
25.5 °C	26.3 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 31.1 °C
Average: 28.4 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

Galaxy Tab S8 5G的两个窄边上共有四个Dolby Atmos扬声器，可播放高达89.4 dB(A)的声音，产生强大的声音，中音和高音非常平衡。虽然低音调有些欠缺，但在声音组合中仍比许多其他平板电脑明显得多。

由于Galaxy Tab S8 5G缺乏3.5毫米插孔，有线音频设备（如耳机）必须通过USB-C适配器连接，而三星并没有在其平板电脑中包含这个适配器。蓝牙音频编解码器AAC、aptX、LDAC和SBC可用于通过蓝牙5.2进行音频输出，这是一个有点稀疏的选择。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。Galaxy Tab S8拥有最佳的电池寿命

消耗功率

三星Galaxy Tab S8系列中最小的平板电脑也有最小的电池：8000毫安时的电池，可以用最大的45瓦特充电。相应的电源适配器只需支付附加费用，在三星网络商店的价格约为50欧元（其他地区的货币价格可能略有不同）。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G在耗电方面受到限制。与对比设备相比，它的耗电量明显较低，尤其是在空转时，因此更加平衡。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.07 Watt
Idle	1.19 / 4.38 / 4.45 Watt
Load	7.85 / 6.67 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro 8600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G 10090 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 8600 mAh
Power Consumption		-62%	-3%	-35%	-26%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	1.19	1.65 -39%	1.55 -30%	3.08 -159%	1.06 11%	1.14 4%
Idle Average *	4.38	8.1 -85%	4.91 -12%	3.69 16%	6.25 -43%	4.3 2%
Idle Maximum *	4.45	9.4 -111%	5.02 -13%	3.76 16%	6.3 -42%	4.31 3%
Load Average *	7.85	9.5 -21%	4.38 44%	7.72 2%	8.76 -12%	8.09 -3%
Load Maximum *	6.67	10.4 -56%	6.81 -2%	9.87 -48%	9.54 -43%	10.32 -55%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.61 (2.12-13.6)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø8.51 (3.67-15)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.97 (6.63-14.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (13.2-15.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.14 (2.07-3.63)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.42 (3.31-4.05)

电池寿命

Galaxy Tab S8 5G对其8000毫安时的电池进行了最佳利用，因为它的电池运行时间比其姐妹机型Tab S8+要长得多。Galaxy Tab S8+和 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra。两者都有更大的电池（10090和11220毫安时），但它们也必须为大得多的显示屏供电。

总的来说，Galaxy Tab S8 5G的运行时间比其他Galaxy Tab S8机型长约三分之一，在模拟网络浏览时持续约16小时，在播放视频时持续近14小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		36h 10min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 31min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro 8600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G 10090 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 8600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-30%	-13%	-38%	19%	8%
Reader / Idle	2170		1641 -24%	846 -61%	2485 15%	3013 39%
H.264	831		851 2%	607 -27%	1249 50%	1009 21%
WiFi v1.3	966	646 -33%	624 -35%	437 -55%	1020 6%	921 -5%
Load	331	245 -26%	348 5%	309 -7%	342 3%	255 -23%

Pros

+ 120赫兹面板

+ 高质量的做工

+ 更新保证

+ 快速的WiFi 6E

+ 直观的笔输入

+ 用于键盘的对接端口

+ 性能非常稳固

+ 四个Dolby Atmos扬声器

+ 电池运行时间长

Cons

- 不包括电源适配器

- 用于蓝牙的音频编解码器很少

- 没有OLED屏幕

- 部分游戏帧率低

对三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的评价

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G是市场上最好的Android 平板电脑之一。它只有11英寸，是Galaxy Tab S8系列中最小的平板电脑，但除了外形和显示屏外，它与更大、更昂贵的Galaxy Tab S8+ 和Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 的区别少得令人惊讶。

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G采用了相同的摄像头，并有三星未来更新的承诺（4年的操作系统升级，5年的安全更新），使用相同的高端SoC与Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 ，并支持高达45瓦的快速充电。此外，还有直观的三星S笔，正如三星所承诺的那样，它可以将Android 平板电脑变成一个创意站。三星的DeX桌面模式可以通过可选的对接键盘得到充分的利用。

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G拥有强大的性能和功能，是目前最好的Android 片之一。

就物理尺寸而言，三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G是三款Galaxy Tab S8平板电脑中最实用的一款，也实现了最长的电池运行时间。仅这一点就应该吸引大多数买家。另一个积极的方面是，Galaxy Tab S8 5G是一款支持HDR10的平板电脑，具有120赫兹。然而，与它的姐妹机型不同，它使用的是TFT而不是OLED面板。颜色不是很鲜艳，但就整体图像质量而言，没有什么可抱怨的。这也适用于亮度，Galaxy Tab S8+和Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra的亮度大致相同。

Galaxy Tab S8 5G只有几个缺点。TFT面板肯定可以更亮，而且考虑到购买价格，可以包括一个电源。更多的蓝牙编解码器也会对该平板电脑有利。

三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G的替代产品有，例如 Apple iPad Air 5 2022和联想Tab P11 Pro，它们更便宜，性能基准和功能相似。在产品支持方面，Apple'的iPad Air 5 2022也比三星表现得略好。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

三星的官方网站提供三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G（与S8+和S8 Ultra并列）的各种配置，价格不一，取决于购买的国家。例如。

美国, 起价为699.00美元
英国, 起价为799.99英镑
加拿大, 起价为899.99加元
澳大利亚, 起价为1,449.00澳元
新西兰, 起价为 NZ$ 1,449.00

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G - 2022-06-01 06/01/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

70 / 70 → 99%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

90%

Display

88%

Games Performance

58 / 78 → 75%

Application Performance

85 / 92 → 93%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 91%

Camera

61 / 85 → 71%

Average

82%

90%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 888 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G评论。11英寸格式中的最大性能

Manuel Masiero, 2022-06- 4 (Update: 2022-06- 4)