三星Galaxy S8 Ultra评论。一个拥有巨大显示屏的超薄高端平板电脑

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Brand: Samsung

一目了然的展示。 这款巨大的三星平板电脑有一个14.6英寸的超级AMOLED显示屏，并由尖端的骁龙8代驱动。尽管电池很大，但Galaxy S8 Ultra只有5.5毫米厚。在我们下面的评论中了解它的表现。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/13/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Tablet

伴随着 Galaxy S8(11英寸)和 Galaxy S8+(12.4英寸），三星首次提供一款具有令人印象深刻的14.6英寸对角线显示屏的平板电脑：Galaxy S8 Ultra。该制造商将其描述为迄今为止有史以来最大的平板电脑。专家们会立即大喊"Galaxy 查看!"，它在2016年试图以18.4英寸显示屏和2.65公斤的重物来吸引买家。但三星并不希望这被看作是一款平板电脑，而是一款便携式电视。

Ultra平板电脑与Plus型号相当相似，但除了更大的显示屏外，它还拥有相应更大的电池和前置的双摄像头。此外，与其他两款平板电脑一样，Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑不仅有8GB内存+128GB ，售价1119.99美元和12GB内存+256GB，售价1229.99美元的变体，而且还有一个更强大的变体，16GB内存+512GB ，售价1499.99美元。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Galaxy Tab S9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

14.60 inch 16:10, 2960 x 1848 pixel 239 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi touch points, native pen support, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 219 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, geomagnetic, hall, OTG, DeX

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 326.4 x 208.6

Battery

11200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, 26 mm, 1/3.4", 1.0 µm) + 6 MPix (ultra wide, f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2) + 12 MPix (ultra wide, f/2.4)

Additional features

Speakers: Quad Stereo Speakers by AKG, Keyboard: Onscreen, S-Pen, USB-C-Cabel, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), fanless

Weight

726 g

Price

1249 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.8 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	726 g	5.5 mm	14.60"	2960x1848
85.8 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619	608 g	6.3 mm	12.40"	2560x1600
89.1 %	04/2022	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650	565 g	5.6 mm	12.60"	2560x1600
88.8 %	10/2021	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Kirin 9000E, Mali-G78 MP22	609 g	6.7 mm	12.60"	2560x1600
91.3 %	06/2021	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1, M1 8-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048
86.2 %	09/2021	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 SD 870, Adreno 650	830 g	6.2 mm	13.00"	2160x1350

外壳：超薄的Galaxy 平板电脑

虽然拥有最大的面板，但三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑是对比图中最薄的，也比它的两个姐妹型号更薄。背面的摄像头驼峰仅突出于外壳1.6毫米，因此在平面上甚至不会晃动。

那些担心这款平板电脑会因其纤细的设计而容易扭曲的人可以放心了：由盔甲铝制成的哑光一体成型的机身原来是非常稳定的，只有背面的玻璃条被打断，用于磁性锁定和为S-Pen充电。另外一块磁铁也可以用来将笔固定在顶部的纵向边缘，但这肯定不是一个运输安全的解决方案。

三星平板电脑的制造质量令人信服，尽管在纵向模式下的重量较高，但单手可以很好地握住，但从长远来看，两只手更舒适。缝隙紧密而均匀，S8 Ultra平板电脑可以经受住扭曲，没有问题。

该平板电脑的电池是永久安装的，用户无法更换。卡槽的盖子比铝制机身的颜色略深，但关闭起来很整齐。在我们的Wi-Fi变体中，该卡槽可以容纳一张microSD卡，而5G型号的背面有空间容纳一张nano-SIM卡。Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑没有IP认证，只有石墨色可供选择。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 DIN A4 ❌

硬件方面。 Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑配备了USB 3.2和microSD支持

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑有一个USB 3.2端口（Gen. 1），只要使用正确的设备，其数据速率可达5GBit/s。该接口还支持OTG，因此可以连接外部外围设备或存储媒体，还能够进行有线视频显示。底部长边上的PIN码用于连接一个可选的书套键盘（EF-DX900）。

此外，这款平板电脑还可以作为Windows PC的附加屏幕使用--这一点通过WLAN很容易实现，在简短指南的帮助下可以快速投入使用。平板电脑的触摸屏和S-Pen也可以在需要的时候使用，这是一个真正的福音，特别是对于创造性的专业人士。在我们的审查中，这与Photoshop的工作完美无缺。然而，由于WLAN的延迟，输入延迟有时有点太长。

微型SD卡读卡器

卡槽接受目前所有的microSD卡，并支持exFAT文件系统。使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60参考卡，传输率相对较高，但该平板电脑并没有穷尽其可能性。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory)	67.4 MB/s +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	53 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	40.34 MB/s -24%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	31.4 MB/s -41%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.7 (31.7-50.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.8 (59.1-89.7)

软件。长的更新周期和三星DeX

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑配备了Android 12，并使用三星自己的One UI 4.1用户界面。与Galaxy S22智能手机一样，制造商确保为平板电脑提供四年的更新和另一年的安全补丁。在这次审查时，最后一次安全更新是在5月1日，因此是最新的。

除了谷歌的应用程序，S8 Ultra平板电脑上还有Galaxy Store和其他功能应用程序。来自微软、Netflix和Spotify的第三方应用都已预装，但几乎所有这些应用都可以卸载。然而，OneDrive只能被停用。

桌面应用程序DeX可以直接使用，不需要外部显示器。

通信和GNSS：Wi-Fi 6E和5G（可选）。

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra在通信设备方面没有留下任何遗憾。最多，一个UWB芯片肯定是有用的，但除此之外，这款平板电脑还有一个现代的组合可以依靠。

结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，三星平板电脑实现了高而稳定的数据速率。然而，快速的速度是保留给6GHz频段的。遗憾的是，三星不允许在5GHz范围内也使用VHT160。

在视频会议期间，S8 Ultra以良好的语音再现而令人信服。双前置摄像头的自动取景功能工作非常准确，可以适当地显示拍摄对象。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1750 (878^min - 1870^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	864 (771^min - 896^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	722 (678^min - 737^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	630 (597^min - 669^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1250 (1126^min - 1368^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	795 (717^min - 849^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	780 (699^min - 882^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	655 (601^min - 674^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	832 (779^min - 876^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	719 (644^min - 771^max) MBit/s -14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	909 (871^min - 942^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	851 (475^min - 925^max) MBit/s -6%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1785 (1685^min - 1866^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1632 (1604^min - 1667^max) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1785 (1685-1866)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1630 (1604-1667)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø832 (779-876)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø719 (644-771)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (871-942)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø851 (475-925)

仅仅由于它的尺寸，Galaxy S8 Ultra当然不是导航任务或其他需要精确定位的应用的理想伴侣。不过，它支持四个最流行的卫星网络。根据规格，日本的QZSS也被支持，但我们无法与之建立连接。

卫星定位在室外非常快速和准确，在室内也相当不错。与之相比 Garmin Venu 2在我们用自行车进行的简短测试中，整个路线的差异只有30米，下面的详细记录也显示了对所覆盖路线的精确追踪。

照相机。S8 Ultra的正面和背面有双摄像头

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra在正面和背面都拥有双摄像头，每个摄像头也都是超广角的。三星更注重正面的设置，因为在那里，超广角提供的分辨率是另一侧对应的两倍。在良好的照明条件下，自拍是令人信服的，而且这款平板电脑在视频通话中表现得特别好。

背面的设置也提供了体面的结果，但在特写镜头中缺乏一点清晰度。由于分辨率低，超广角显示出相当差的景深。然而，这种设置更多的是用于记录目的，完全可以满足这个要求。额外的辅助LED使其更容易在昏暗的光线下使用，并能防止对焦领域的潜在阴影。

视频可以在两侧以每秒30帧的速度录制成超高清。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

Apple iPad Air 2019

Xiaomi Pad 5

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

Apple iPad Air 2019

Xiaomi Pad 5

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

Samsung Galaxy S22

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

Apple iPad Air 2019

Xiaomi Pad 5

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

Apple iPad Air 2019

Xiaomi Pad 5

Canon EOS 90D

在受控的照明条件下，三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的摄像头实现了良好的成像性能。颜色相当自然，始终保持在DeltaE 10以下。绿色调显示出最高的偏差。测试图也被很好地捕捉到，并在这个过程中被明显地重新锐化，这可能被证明对文件有好处。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: 5.89 ∆E min: 2.81 - max: 9.63 ∆E

配件和保修。还提供防盗保险

从Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的平面包装可以看出，它并没有配备电源装置。三星提供一条USB线（Type-C到Type-C），一个打开卡槽的小工具和S Pen。

可以选择购买屏幕保护膜、保护罩、配套的45瓦电源装置或书套键盘。此外，S笔可以单独购买，有五种颜色。

Samsung Care+ 保险套餐也提供了各种选项的保障，包括防盗保险。价格根据选择的选项而不同。

输入设备和操作。位置良好的指纹扫描仪

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的大型电容式触摸屏可同时识别十次触摸，并有康宁大猩猩5号玻璃保护。表面的滑行性能非常好，可以快速、准确地进行输入。

这款三星平板电脑有一个带有蓝牙功能的主动式S笔。所有已知的功能和手势都得到支持，而且只有在笔的电池充电后才能工作。如果电池没电，笔只能使用不需要蓝牙的功能。在测试中，该笔因其高精度而脱颖而出。

当S8 Ultra平板电脑以横向握持时，用拇指可以很容易地触及屏幕右侧边缘集成在显示屏上的光学指纹传感器。识别率很高，平板电脑可以快速解锁。另外，也可以通过前置摄像头设置人脸识别，速度稍快，但也不太可靠。

显示屏。巨大的120Hz超级AMOLED

迄今为止，没有任何平板电脑的显示屏比三星Galaxy S8 Ultra更大，其面板的对角线达到了令人印象深刻的14.6英寸（37.08厘米）。当与 Galaxy S8+，它仍然看起来很大。像素密度也很高，足以确保显示清晰，尽管它的PPI数是S8平板电脑系列中最低的。S8 Ultra采用60或120赫兹的固定刷新率工作，支持HDR10+和HDR10以及HLG。

Super AMOLED显示屏的亮度与S7 FE平板电脑处于同一水平。 Galaxy S7 FE平板电脑并且在传感器激活的情况下，可以达到604cd/m²的平均亮度。那些没有控制快速工作的环境光传感器的人，将回落到359 cd/m²。HDR内容的显示是令人高兴的，因为我们测得的峰值亮度为795cd/m²，明亮和黑暗区域分布均匀（APL50）。1.81cd/m²的最低亮度已经是令人愉快的低水平，但通过额外的调光功能，可以再次稍微降低到1.49cd/m²。

与其他OLED一样，Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的面板也会出现闪烁。在最低亮度下，频率在118.7和250.8赫兹之间波动。然而，除此之外，它很快就平息在一个相当稳定的240赫兹。


610 cd/m²	609 cd/m²	607 cd/m²
602 cd/m²	600 cd/m²	591 cd/m²
612 cd/m²	614 cd/m²	594 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 614 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 604.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Super AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.60	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.40	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.60	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 OLED, 2560x1600, 12.60	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 IPS mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.90	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 IPS, 2160x1350, 13.00
Screen		-25%	-15%	-6%	-5%	-49%
Brightness middle	600	619 3%	552 -8%	383 -36%	620 3%	404 -33%
Brightness	604	593 -2%	555 -8%	390 -35%	612 1%	374 -38%
Brightness Distribution	96	91 -5%	97 1%	94 -2%	96 0%	85 -11%
Black Level *		0.22				0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.7	2.6 4%	3.43 -27%	2.1 22%	1.8 33%	2.94 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.3	6.6 -25%	7.25 -37%	3.7 30%	4.9 8%	8.74 -65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	4 -122%	2 -11%	2.1 -17%	3.1 -72%	4.3 -139%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.17 ^101%	2.253 ^98%	2.14 ^103%	2214 ^0%	2.14 ^103%
CCT	6461 ^101%	6973 ^93%	6417 ^101%	6258 ^104%	6892 ^94%	7084 ^92%
Contrast		2814				1010

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra的显示屏在自然模式下产生最真实的色彩，结果非常好，几乎没有发现任何明显的偏差。预设的 "鲜艳 "模式也有类似的良好灰度再现，但色彩更加饱和。相反，该平板电脑在这里使用更大的DCI-P3色彩空间，而不是sRGB。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6875 ms rise
1.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6925 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.495 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7725 ms rise
1.495 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.772 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑在户外给人留下了良好的印象，在大多数情况下都可以很好地使用。只有阳光直射才会影响使用，特别是当你从侧面看平板电脑时，因为表面的反射相当强烈。

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的视角稳定性非常好，但在非常平坦的视角下，许多OLED典型的彩虹雾度变得稍微可见。然而，看不到真正的色彩失真，亮度的损失也很小。

性能。利用Snapdragon 8 Gen 1达到峰值性能

与它的兄弟姐妹一样，三星Galaxy S8 Ultra搭载了迄今为止Android 设备的最快SoC，即骁龙8代。根据所选择的内存配置，该芯片组有8、12甚至16GB的内存供其使用。

这款三星平板电脑的系统性能非常好，仅次于iPad Pro 12.9与 Apple M1.只是Geekbench下的多核性能比预期的要弱一些。然而，在日常使用中，Tab S8 Ultra的工作速度非常快，而且没有卡顿现象。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378	1710 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1242 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1181 - 1298, n=21)	1231 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	967 Points -22%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	955 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	656 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378	7378 Points +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=21)	3548 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	3393 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	3215 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	3131 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	1885 Points -44%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378	1186706 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (692924 - 1041980, n=18)	928953 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	889268 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	707685 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	676505 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	356422 Points -60%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	13996 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	13565 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (10140 - 17025, n=21)	13216 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	10829 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	8897 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points -38%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378	1283 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1090 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (749 - 1169, n=14)	993 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	732 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points -38%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6007 - 7665, n=15)	6951 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	6816 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	6164 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	5865 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	3608 Points -47%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378	Points -100%
System
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	10489 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9273 - 11338, n=15)	10312 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	10112 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	9124 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	7162 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points -35%
Memory
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	7365 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	7215 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5125 - 8906, n=15)	6787 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	6763 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	4637 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points -37%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	22308 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (15216 - 22308, n=15)	20338 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	12350 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	11754 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	4022 Points -82%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1291 - 1888, n=15)	1659 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	1544 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	1452 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1415 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	1283 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points -15%

AImark - Score v2.x
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	119686 Points +1869%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	114525 Points +1784%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	45392 Points +647%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1046 - 96317, n=14)	17097 Points +181%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	6078 Points
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 6865, n=6, last 2 years)	5427 Points -11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	73266 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (61568 - 81722, n=8)	72917 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021	13069 Points -82%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points -88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	8436 Points -88%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, ARM Mali-G78 MP22, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

Average of class Tablet

有了阿德雷诺730，Galaxy S8 Ultra有一个强大的GPU供其使用。与CPU和系统性能一样，三星平板电脑在Android 竞争对手中占主导地位，但总是排在 iPad Pro 12.9，而且有时会有相当大的差距。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	4975 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2325 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1805 Points -22%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1225 Points -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1195 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	334 Points -86%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	5035 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2337 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1863 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1203 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	330 Points -86%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	18303 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9519 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6399 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4199 Points -56%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	4154 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1099 Points -88%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	17221 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8833 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6259 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4211 Points -52%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	4204 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1101 Points -88%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11598 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10349 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	7588 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4058 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	42751 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21768 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16653 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4283 Points -80%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5623 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3649 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3578 Points -2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	1956 Points -46%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9630 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8799 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8365 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2938 Points -67%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14734 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12079 Points -18%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10321 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2738 Points -81%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5633 Points +54%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5265 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3651 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3523 Points -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	44 fps -63%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	588 fps +104%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	288 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	232 fps -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	226 fps -22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	224 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	55 fps -81%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	60 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	25 fps -68%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	318 fps +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	154 fps -10%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	131 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	43 fps -75%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	74 fps +48%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	59 fps +18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps -68%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	227 fps +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	92 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	32 fps -72%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	55.3 fps +98%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	42 fps +50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps +46%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	9.8 fps -65%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	150 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	57 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps -74%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	43.7 fps +62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	27 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.7 fps -75%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	63 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	22 fps -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.3 fps -79%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	67 fps +72%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	43 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps -74%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe	177 fps +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	59 fps -34%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps -79%

三星在网络冲浪方面有不错的速度，这一点得到了基准测试的证实。只有Apple 平板电脑在这一领域有自己的优势。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)	182.5 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	126.3 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	108.3 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)	107.9 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	94 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)	72.8 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	55.3 Points -56%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378	403.4 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	230.8 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)	195.6 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	184.5 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	171.2 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)	126.4 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	93.4 Points -60%
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)	85.4 Points -63%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)	221 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	173 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	155 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)	142.9 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	134 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)	97 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	83 Points -52%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)	210 runs/min +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	119 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)	104 runs/min -13%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min -35%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chome 92)	74.2 runs/min -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)	72.1 runs/min -39%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	65.5 runs/min -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	43.09 runs/min -64%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)	62789 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	48281 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)	42391 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	41256 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	33694 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)	24616 Points -49%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	17823 Points -63%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -282%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	2403 ms * -186%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)	1629 ms * -94%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	1158 ms * -38%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	1055 ms * -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)	1010 ms * -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	839 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)	495 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

三星平板电脑使用快速的UFS 3.1内存：在测试中确认了体面的速度。只有连续写入数据的速度可以更高。然而，在日常使用中，这只有在与更快的竞争对手直接比较时才会明显。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-25%	8%	79%	4%	44%	-28%
Sequential Read 256KB	1817	861 -53%	1782 -2%	2031 12%	1431 -21%	1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87) -3%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) -53%
Sequential Write 256KB	451.6	512 13%	758 68%	1559 245%	711 57%	1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87) 151%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) 18%
Random Read 4KB	238	192 -19%	232.5 -2%	310 30%	249.1 5%	281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87) 18%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) -30%
Random Write 4KB	284.9	167.5 -41%	189.2 -34%	369.7 30%	215.2 -24%	311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88) 9%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -47%

游戏。 Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑变成了一个体面的玩伴

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑搭载了性能强劲的高通Adreno 730，我们与合作伙伴 GameBench一起确认了这一点。.

尽管显示分辨率很高，但要求很高的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》，可以在持续的40 FPS下完全运行。即使你稍微降低细节水平，你仍然可以达到60 FPS。在《荒野大镖客》中，三星平板电脑以恒定的60FPS运行，但90或120赫兹的HFR设置不可用。

这款平板电脑超过700克，长时间拿着相当重，所以我们在玩的时候把S8 Ultra支在腿上或桌子边上。作为回报，巨大的屏幕表面提供了一个很好的概述，四个扬声器创造了一个吸引人的氛围。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.1.0.5408: Ø60.4 (55-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø58.9 (50-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.9.0: Ø39.9 (36-42)

排放。良好的扬声器

温度

当在最大显示亮度下空转时，三星Galaxy S8 Ultra只略微发热。即使在恒定的负载下，它也只是部分超过30度的标志。

我们用3DMark压力测试对该平板电脑的高端SoC的性能稳定性进行了测试。尽管表面积很大，但S8 Ultra无法保持性能恒定，并像大多数同样依赖骁龙8代的智能手机一样节流到类似水平。另一方面，三星平板电脑在压力测试开始时总是比采用前代芯片组的同类产品快，并在较长时间内产生几乎两倍的帧数。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø40.4 (34.9-53.1)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.55-14.1)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø7.3 (7.29-7.33)

Max. Load

Idle


33.7 °C	32.4 °C	28.3 °C
28.7 °C	29.6 °C	27.5 °C
30.1 °C	29.6 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 33.7 °C
Average: 29.7 °C


27.6 °C	27.6 °C	29.9 °C
26.3 °C	27.7 °C	27.8 °C
25.3 °C	26.8 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 29.9 °C
Average: 27.2 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的四个扬声器支持杜比全景声，并由AKG进行了微调。声音非常平衡，但可以有更多的深度。总的来说，对于平板电脑来说，声音输出是非常好的。

没有音频插孔，所以如果你想连接模拟耳机或扬声器，你必须使用一个可选的USB适配器。另外，声音也可以通过蓝牙输出。然而，与三星的惯例一样，音频编解码器的选择非常有限，只有SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC可用。当同时流向两个蓝牙接收器时，只能使用SBC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。 Galaxy 拥有11.200毫安时的S8 Ultra平板电脑

消耗功率

在功耗方面，事实证明大显示屏非常耗电，空转时需要比Galaxy S8平板电脑多出60%以上的能量，但几乎与S8+持平。然而，在高峰负荷时，Ultra平板电脑是相当经济的。

S8 Ultra平板电脑支持高达45瓦的有线充电，可以在一个半小时左右将电池充满。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.15 Watt
Idle	3.18 / 3.84 / 3.88 Watt
Load	8.04 / 10.44 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 11200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 10050 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 10000 mAh
Power Consumption		-12%	17%	-78%	-67%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	3.18	1.06 67%	2.2 31%	6.2 -95%	1.8 43%	3 6%
Idle Average *	3.84	6.25 -63%	2.6 32%	9.07 -136%	9.6 -150%	3.4 11%
Idle Maximum *	3.88	6.3 -62%	3.2 18%	9.12 -135%	9.8 -153%	4.1 -6%
Load Average *	8.04	8.76 -9%	7.1 12%	8.79 -9%	12.2 -52%	9.9 -23%
Load Maximum *	10.44	9.54 9%	11.5 -10%	12.07 -16%	12.6 -21%	13.8 -32%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø9.1 (3.64-15.9)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø6.84 (2.48-12.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.2 (13.4-15.6)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.67 (8.92-10.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.39 (3.33-4.04)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.7 (2.52-3.42)

电池寿命

功耗测量值已经表明，关于三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的电池寿命，不应期望有什么超级大奖。考虑到大面板，调整显示亮度（150cd/m²）的测试结果很好，但与较小面板的竞争对手相比，明显较弱。

然而，这似乎也是由于耗能的Wi-Fi模块（如Wi-Fi测试中所示），因为在负载下确定的数值并没有低很多。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		15h 49min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 99)		8h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 27min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 11200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 10050 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 10000 mAh
Battery Runtime		85%	7%	65%	7%	83%
Reader / Idle	949	2485 162%	1034 9%	2080 119%		2536 167%
H.264	651	1249 92%	892 37%	1367 110%	818 26%	1199 84%
WiFi v1.3	521	1020 96%	627 20%	740 42%	673 29%	1056 103%
Load	387	342 -12%	236 -39%	342 -12%	255 -34%	306 -21%

Pros

+ 巨大的AMOLED显示屏，精确的色彩管理

+ 惊人的性能

+ 可扩展的内存

+ 包括S-Pen

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 电池寿命一般

- 没有自适应刷新率

- 缺少蓝牙的音频编解码器

评语：强大的巨型平板电脑，几乎没有弱点

在审查中。三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑拥有14.6英寸Super AMOLED显示屏，在最真实的意义上是一个真正的吸引眼球的东西。但它的优势不仅是美学上的。快速的Snapdragon确保了所有领域的卓越性能，扬声器提供了良好的声音，DeX模式可以直接在设备上运行，而摄像头非常适合视频通话。

那些寻找具有大显示屏的高端平板电脑的人，不需要再去找Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑。

另一个实用的功能是，S8 Ultra平板电脑可以作为Windows PC的第二个屏幕使用，完全不需要任何电缆，但有轻微的延迟。强大的S-Pen也包含在交货中。使用microSD卡可以进一步扩展内存，这就是为什么在为平板电脑选择合适的内存配置时，内存配置应该是主要考虑因素。

三星平板电脑没有提供太多值得批评的地方。对刷新率的自适应控制肯定是可取的，而且必须对电池寿命做出妥协，这当然可以通过更新来改善。额外的防尘和防水保护也可以成为一个独特的卖点。

如果你能接受一个较小的显示屏，那么 Apple iPad Pro 12.9不一定更贵，而且拥有更大范围的优化应用程序。价格较低的是联想Tab P12 Pro，它也允许笔输入，但与三星和Apple 相比，工作起来没有那么准确。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

在发稿时，三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑通过美国亚马逊发售，有三个版本。128GB 售价1,119.99美元。 256GB为1,229.99美元，以及 512GB为1,499.99美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

90 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

65 / 70 → 92%

Weight

80 / 40-88 → 82%

Battery

86%

Display

90%

Games Performance

59 / 78 → 76%

Application Performance

88 / 92 → 95%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

85 / 91 → 93%

Camera

64 / 85 → 76%

Average

82%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 915 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S8 Ultra评论。一个拥有巨大显示屏的超薄高端平板电脑

Daniel Schmidt, 2022-05-13 (Update: 2022-05-13)