Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra评论。一个拥有巨大显示屏的超薄高端平板电脑

一目了然的展示。 这款巨大的三星平板电脑有一个14.6英寸的超级AMOLED显示屏,并由尖端的骁龙8代驱动。尽管电池很大,但Galaxy S8 Ultra只有5.5毫米厚。在我们下面的评论中了解它的表现。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

伴随着 Galaxy S8(11英寸)和 Galaxy S8+(12.4英寸),三星首次提供一款具有令人印象深刻的14.6英寸对角线显示屏的平板电脑:Galaxy S8 Ultra。该制造商将其描述为迄今为止有史以来最大的平板电脑。专家们会立即大喊"Galaxy 查看!",它在2016年试图以18.4英寸显示屏和2.65公斤的重物来吸引买家。但三星并不希望这被看作是一款平板电脑,而是一款便携式电视。

Ultra平板电脑与Plus型号相当相似,但除了更大的显示屏外,它还拥有相应更大的电池和前置的双摄像头。此外,与其他两款平板电脑一样,Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑不仅有8GB内存+128GB ,售价1119.99美元和12GB内存+256GB,售价1229.99美元的变体,而且还有一个更强大的变体,16GB内存+512GB ,售价1499.99美元。


Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Galaxy Tab S Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
14.60 inch 16:10, 2960 x 1848 pixel 239 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi touch points, native pen support, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, geomagnetic, hall, OTG, DeX
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 326.4 x 208.6
Battery
11200 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, 26 mm, 1/3.4", 1.0 µm) + 6 MPix (ultra wide, f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2) + 12 MPix (ultra wide, f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Quad Stereo Speakers by AKG, Keyboard: Onscreen, S-Pen, USB-C-Cabel, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), fanless
Weight
726 g
Price
1249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.5 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
726 g5.5 mm14.60"2960x1848
85.8 %
07/2021
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
608 g6.3 mm12.40"2560x1600
88.8 %
04/2022
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
565 g5.6 mm12.60"2560x1600
88.5 %
10/2021
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Kirin 9000E, Mali-G78 MP22
609 g6.7 mm12.60"2560x1600
91.1 %
06/2021
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1, M1 8-Core GPU
682 g6.4 mm12.90"2732x2048
86.2 %
09/2021
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
SD 870, Adreno 650
830 g6.2 mm13.00"2160x1350

外壳:超薄的Galaxy 平板电脑

虽然拥有最大的面板,但三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑是对比图中最薄的,也比它的两个姐妹型号更薄。背面的摄像头驼峰仅突出于外壳1.6毫米,因此在平面上甚至不会晃动。

那些担心这款平板电脑会因其纤细的设计而容易扭曲的人可以放心了:由盔甲铝制成的哑光一体成型的机身原来是非常稳定的,只有背面的玻璃条被打断,用于磁性锁定和为S-Pen充电。另外一块磁铁也可以用来将笔固定在顶部的纵向边缘,但这肯定不是一个运输安全的解决方案。

三星平板电脑的制造质量令人信服,尽管在纵向模式下的重量较高,但单手可以很好地握住,但从长远来看,两只手更舒适。缝隙紧密而均匀,S8 Ultra平板电脑可以经受住扭曲,没有问题。

该平板电脑的电池是永久安装的,用户无法更换。卡槽的盖子比铝制机身的颜色略深,但关闭起来很整齐。在我们的Wi-Fi变体中,该卡槽可以容纳一张microSD卡,而5G型号的背面有空间容纳一张nano-SIM卡。Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑没有IP认证,只有石墨色可供选择。

与Galaxy S22的尺寸比较

尺寸比较

326.4 mm 208.6 mm 5.5 mm 726 g293.35 mm 203.98 mm 6.2 mm 830 g286.5 mm 184.7 mm 6.7 mm 609 g285.6 mm 184.5 mm 5.6 mm 565 g284.8 mm 185 mm 6.3 mm 608 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.4 mm 682 g

硬件方面。 Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑配备了USB 3.2和microSD支持

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑有一个USB 3.2端口(Gen. 1),只要使用正确的设备,其数据速率可达5GBit/s。该接口还支持OTG,因此可以连接外部外围设备或存储媒体,还能够进行有线视频显示。底部长边上的PIN码用于连接一个可选的书套键盘(EF-DX900)。

此外,这款平板电脑还可以作为Windows PC的附加屏幕使用--这一点通过WLAN很容易实现,在简短指南的帮助下可以快速投入使用。平板电脑的触摸屏和S-Pen也可以在需要的时候使用,这是一个真正的福音,特别是对于创造性的专业人士。在我们的审查中,这与Photoshop的工作完美无缺。然而,由于WLAN的延迟,输入延迟有时有点太长。

顶部:电源、音量、麦克风、卡槽
顶部:电源、音量、麦克风、卡槽
左边:扬声器、麦克风、音箱
左边:扬声器、麦克风、音箱
右:扬声器、USB、扬声器
右:扬声器、USB、扬声器
底部边缘。键盘盖的密码
底部边缘。键盘盖的密码

微型SD卡读卡器

卡槽接受目前所有的microSD卡,并支持exFAT文件系统。使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60参考卡,传输率相对较高,但该平板电脑并没有穷尽其可能性。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory)
67.4 MB/s ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
53 MB/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40.34 MB/s ∼60% -24%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
31.4 MB/s ∼47% -41%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.7 (31.7-50.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.8 (59.1-89.7)

软件。长的更新周期和三星DeX

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑配备了Android 12,并使用三星自己的One UI 4.1用户界面。与Galaxy S22智能手机一样,制造商确保为平板电脑提供四年的更新和另一年的安全补丁。在这次审查时,最后一次安全更新是在5月1日,因此是最新的。

除了谷歌的应用程序,S8 Ultra平板电脑上还有Galaxy Store和其他功能应用程序。来自微软、Netflix和Spotify的第三方应用都已预装,但几乎所有这些应用都可以卸载。然而,OneDrive只能被停用。

桌面应用程序DeX可以直接使用,不需要外部显示器。

通信和GNSS:Wi-Fi 6E和5G(可选)。

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra在通信设备方面没有留下任何遗憾。最多,一个UWB芯片肯定是有用的,但除此之外,这款平板电脑还有一个现代的组合可以依靠。

结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,三星平板电脑实现了高而稳定的数据速率。然而,快速的速度是保留给6GHz频段的。遗憾的是,三星不允许在5GHz范围内也使用VHT160。

在视频会议期间,S8 Ultra以良好的语音再现而令人信服。双前置摄像头的自动取景功能工作非常准确,可以适当地显示拍摄对象。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1750 (878min - 1870max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
864 (771min - 896max) MBit/s ∼49%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
722 (678min - 737max) MBit/s ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
630 (597min - 669max) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1250 (1126min - 1368max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
795 (717min - 849max) MBit/s ∼64%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
780 (699min - 882max) MBit/s ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655 (601min - 674max) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
832 (779min - 876max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
719 (644min - 771max) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
909 (871min - 942max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
851 (475min - 925max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1785 (1685min - 1866max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1632 (1604min - 1667max) MBit/s ∼100%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1785 (1685-1866)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 6GHz 6E; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1630 (1604-1667)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø832 (779-876)
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø719 (644-771)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (871-942)
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø851 (475-925)
GPS测试:在室内
在室内
GPS测试:户外
户外活动
GPSTest。全球导航卫星系统概述
全球导航卫星系统

仅仅由于它的尺寸,Galaxy S8 Ultra当然不是导航任务或其他需要精确定位的应用的理想伴侣。不过,它支持四个最流行的卫星网络。根据规格,日本的QZSS也被支持,但我们无法与之建立连接。

卫星定位在室外非常快速和准确,在室内也相当不错。与之相比 Garmin Venu 2在我们用自行车进行的简短测试中,整个路线的差异只有30米,下面的详细记录也显示了对所覆盖路线的精确追踪。

GNSS试骑:环湖
GNSS试骑:环湖
全球卫星导航系统测试:循环
全球卫星导航系统测试:循环
全球卫星导航系统测试之旅:总结
全球卫星导航系统测试之旅:总结

照相机。S8 Ultra的正面和背面有双摄像头

与Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑自拍
与Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑自拍

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra在正面和背面都拥有双摄像头,每个摄像头也都是超广角的。三星更注重正面的设置,因为在那里,超广角提供的分辨率是另一侧对应的两倍。在良好的照明条件下,自拍是令人信服的,而且这款平板电脑在视频通话中表现得特别好。

背面的设置也提供了体面的结果,但在特写镜头中缺乏一点清晰度。由于分辨率低,超广角显示出相当差的景深。然而,这种设置更多的是用于记录目的,完全可以满足这个要求。额外的辅助LED使其更容易在昏暗的光线下使用,并能防止对焦领域的潜在阴影。

视频可以在两侧以每秒30帧的速度录制成超高清。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

在受控的照明条件下,三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的摄像头实现了良好的成像性能。颜色相当自然,始终保持在DeltaE 10以下。绿色调显示出最高的偏差。测试图也被很好地捕捉到,并在这个过程中被明显地重新锐化,这可能被证明对文件有好处。

ColorChecker
4.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: 5.89 ∆E min: 2.81 - max: 9.63 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
49 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra: 47.46 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 93.71 ∆E

配件和保修。还提供防盗保险

从Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的平面包装可以看出,它并没有配备电源装置。三星提供一条USB线(Type-C到Type-C),一个打开卡槽的小工具和S Pen。

可以选择购买屏幕保护膜、保护罩、配套的45瓦电源装置或书套键盘。此外,S笔可以单独购买,有五种颜色。

Samsung Care+ 保险套餐也提供了各种选项的保障,包括防盗保险。价格根据选择的选项而不同。

输入设备和操作。位置良好的指纹扫描仪

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的大型电容式触摸屏可同时识别十次触摸,并有康宁大猩猩5号玻璃保护。表面的滑行性能非常好,可以快速、准确地进行输入。

这款三星平板电脑有一个带有蓝牙功能的主动式S笔。所有已知的功能和手势都得到支持,而且只有在笔的电池充电后才能工作。如果电池没电,笔只能使用不需要蓝牙的功能。在测试中,该笔因其高精度而脱颖而出。

当S8 Ultra平板电脑以横向握持时,用拇指可以很容易地触及屏幕右侧边缘集成在显示屏上的光学指纹传感器。识别率很高,平板电脑可以快速解锁。另外,也可以通过前置摄像头设置人脸识别,速度稍快,但也不太可靠。

 

显示屏。巨大的120Hz超级AMOLED

子像素网格
子像素网格

迄今为止,没有任何平板电脑的显示屏比三星Galaxy S8 Ultra更大,其面板的对角线达到了令人印象深刻的14.6英寸(37.08厘米)。当与 Galaxy S8+,它仍然看起来很大。像素密度也很高,足以确保显示清晰,尽管它的PPI数是S8平板电脑系列中最低的。S8 Ultra采用60或120赫兹的固定刷新率工作,支持HDR10+和HDR10以及HLG。

Super AMOLED显示屏的亮度与S7 FE平板电脑处于同一水平。 Galaxy S7 FE平板电脑并且在传感器激活的情况下,可以达到604cd/m²的平均亮度。那些没有控制快速工作的环境光传感器的人,将回落到359 cd/m²。HDR内容的显示是令人高兴的,因为我们测得的峰值亮度为795cd/m²,明亮和黑暗区域分布均匀(APL50)。1.81cd/m²的最低亮度已经是令人愉快的低水平,但通过额外的调光功能,可以再次稍微降低到1.49cd/m²。

与其他OLED一样,Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的面板也会出现闪烁。在最低亮度下,频率在118.7和250.8赫兹之间波动。然而,除此之外,它很快就平息在一个相当稳定的240赫兹。

610
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 614 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 604.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Super AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.60
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.40
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.60
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
OLED, 2560x1600, 12.60
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
IPS mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.90
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
IPS, 2160x1350, 13.00
Screen
-25%
-15%
-6%
-5%
-49%
Brightness middle
600
619
3%
552
-8%
383
-36%
620
3%
404
-33%
Brightness
604
593
-2%
555
-8%
390
-35%
612
1%
374
-38%
Brightness Distribution
96
91
-5%
97
1%
94
-2%
96
0%
85
-11%
Black Level *
0.22
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.7
2.6
4%
3.43
-27%
2.1
22%
1.8
33%
2.94
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.3
6.6
-25%
7.25
-37%
3.7
30%
4.9
8%
8.74
-65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
4
-122%
2
-11%
2.1
-17%
3.1
-72%
4.3
-139%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.17 101%
2.253 98%
2.14 103%
2214 0%
2.14 103%
CCT
6461 101%
6973 93%
6417 101%
6258 104%
6892 94%
7084 92%
Contrast
2814
1010

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小亮度
分钟。
25%的亮度
25%
50%的亮度
50%
75%的亮度st
75%
最大手动亮度
100%

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra的显示屏在自然模式下产生最真实的色彩,结果非常好,几乎没有发现任何明显的偏差。预设的 "鲜艳 "模式也有类似的良好灰度再现,但色彩更加饱和。相反,该平板电脑在这里使用更大的DCI-P3色彩空间,而不是sRGB。

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6875 ms rise
↘ 0.6925 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.495 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7725 ms rise
↘ 0.772 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑在户外给人留下了良好的印象,在大多数情况下都可以很好地使用。只有阳光直射才会影响使用,特别是当你从侧面看平板电脑时,因为表面的反射相当强烈。

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的视角稳定性非常好,但在非常平坦的视角下,许多OLED典型的彩虹雾度变得稍微可见。然而,看不到真正的色彩失真,亮度的损失也很小。

性能。利用Snapdragon 8 Gen 1达到峰值性能

与它的兄弟姐妹一样,三星Galaxy S8 Ultra搭载了迄今为止Android 设备的最快SoC,即骁龙8代。根据所选择的内存配置,该芯片组有8、12甚至16GB的内存供其使用。

这款三星平板电脑的系统性能非常好,仅次于iPad Pro 12.9Apple M1.只是Geekbench下的多核性能比预期的要弱一些。然而,在日常使用中,Tab S8 Ultra的工作速度非常快,而且没有卡顿现象。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1710 Points ∼84% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
1242 Points ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1182 - 1267, n=12)
1228 Points ∼60% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
967 Points ∼47% -22%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
955 Points ∼47% -23%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=47, last 2 years)
679 Points ∼33% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
656 Points ∼32% -47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
7378 Points ∼26% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=12)
3551 Points ∼12% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
3393 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
3215 Points ∼11% -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
3131 Points ∼11% -8%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=47, last 2 years)
2308 Points ∼8% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1885 Points ∼7% -44%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1186706 Points ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (821646 - 1041980, n=12)
944318 Points ∼80% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
889268 Points ∼75%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
707685 Points ∼60% -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
676505 Points ∼57% -24%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1186706, n=24, last 2 years)
553815 Points ∼47% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
356422 Points ∼30% -60%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
13996 Points ∼75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (12144 - 17025, n=12)
13752 Points ∼74% -2%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
13565 Points ∼73% -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10829 Points ∼58% -23%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=23, last 2 years)
9035 Points ∼49% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
8897 Points ∼48% -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1283 Points ∼56% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
1090 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (811 - 1169, n=7)
1029 Points ∼45% -6%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 1283, n=13, last 2 years)
834 Points ∼36% -23%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
732 Points ∼32% -33%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
6816 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6007 - 7147, n=9)
6719 Points ∼80% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
6164 Points ∼73% -10%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
5865 Points ∼69% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
3608 Points ∼43% -47%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 6908, n=28, last 2 years)
3418 Points ∼40% -50%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
Points ∼0% -100%
System
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10489 Points ∼53% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9273 - 10926, n=9)
10212 Points ∼52% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
10112 Points ∼51%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
9124 Points ∼46% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
7162 Points ∼36% -29%
Average of class Tablet (1492 - 10926, n=28, last 2 years)
6069 Points ∼31% -40%
Memory
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
7365 Points ∼81% +9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
7215 Points ∼80% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
6763 Points ∼75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5125 - 7357, n=9)
6287 Points ∼70% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4637 Points ∼51% -31%
Average of class Tablet (675 - 8167, n=28, last 2 years)
3790 Points ∼42% -44%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
22308 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (15216 - 22308, n=9)
19982 Points ∼69% -10%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
12350 Points ∼43% -45%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
11754 Points ∼41% -47%
Average of class Tablet (542 - 22308, n=28, last 2 years)
6430 Points ∼22% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4022 Points ∼14% -82%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1291 - 1888, n=9)
1605 Points ∼67% +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
1544 Points ∼65% +9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
1452 Points ∼61% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
1415 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1283 Points ∼54% -9%
Average of class Tablet (730 - 1581, n=28, last 2 years)
1183 Points ∼49% -16%
AImark - Score v2.x
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
119686 Points ∼42% +1869%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
114525 Points ∼40% +1784%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
45392 Points ∼16% +647%
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=22, last 2 years)
31292 Points ∼11% +415%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5783 - 96317, n=8)
25718 Points ∼9% +323%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
6078 Points ∼2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
Points ∼0% -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
73266 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (63613 - 73266, n=3)
68586 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Tablet (1535 - 73266, n=8, last 2 years)
14162 Points ∼19% -81%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
13069 Points ∼18% -82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
8436 Points ∼12% -88%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, ARM Mali-G78 MP22, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash

有了 阿德雷诺730,Galaxy S8 Ultra有一个强大的GPU供其使用。与CPU和系统性能一样,三星平板电脑在Android 竞争对手中占主导地位,但总是排在 iPad Pro 12.9,而且有时会有相当大的差距。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
4975 Points ∼100% +114%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2325 Points ∼47%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1805 Points ∼36% -22%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1225 Points ∼25% -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1195 Points ∼24% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
334 Points ∼7% -86%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
5035 Points ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2337 Points ∼46%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1863 Points ∼37% -20%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1232 Points ∼24% -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1203 Points ∼24% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
330 Points ∼7% -86%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
18303 Points ∼100% +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9519 Points ∼52%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6399 Points ∼35% -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4199 Points ∼23% -56%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4154 Points ∼23% -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1099 Points ∼6% -88%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
17221 Points ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8833 Points ∼51%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6259 Points ∼36% -29%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4211 Points ∼24% -52%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4204 Points ∼24% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1101 Points ∼6% -88%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11598 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10349 Points ∼89%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
7588 Points ∼65% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4058 Points ∼35% -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
42751 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21768 Points ∼51%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16653 Points ∼39% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4283 Points ∼10% -80%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5623 Points ∼100% +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3649 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3578 Points ∼64% -2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
1956 Points ∼35% -46%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9630 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8799 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8365 Points ∼87% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2938 Points ∼31% -67%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14734 Points ∼100%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12079 Points ∼82% -18%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10321 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2738 Points ∼19% -81%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5633 Points ∼100% +54%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5265 Points ∼93% +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3651 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3523 Points ∼63% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps ∼51% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44 fps ∼37% -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
588 fps ∼100% +104%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
288 fps ∼49%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
232 fps ∼39% -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
226 fps ∼38% -22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
224 fps ∼38% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps ∼9% -81%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
115 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼69%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps ∼68% -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps ∼53% -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼52% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼22% -68%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
318 fps ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps ∼54%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps ∼48% -10%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps ∼42% -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
131 fps ∼41% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼14% -75%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
74 fps ∼100% +48%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
59 fps ∼80% +18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼78% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps ∼68%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps ∼66% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼22% -68%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
227 fps ∼100% +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps ∼51%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps ∼49% -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps ∼42% -17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
92 fps ∼41% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps ∼14% -72%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
55.3 fps ∼100% +98%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
42 fps ∼76% +50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps ∼74% +46%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼54% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.8 fps ∼18% -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
150 fps ∼100% +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼45%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps ∼43% -6%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼39% -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
57 fps ∼38% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps ∼12% -74%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
43.7 fps ∼100% +62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼69% +11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
27 fps ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps ∼62%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps ∼46% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.7 fps ∼15% -75%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
63 fps ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps ∼56%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼49% -11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
22 fps ∼35% -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps ∼35% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.3 fps ∼12% -79%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
67 fps ∼100% +72%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼66% +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
43 fps ∼64% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼58%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps ∼48% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼15% -74%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
177 fps ∼100% +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps ∼43% -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
59 fps ∼33% -34%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼32% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼11% -79%

三星在网络冲浪方面有不错的速度,这一点得到了基准测试的证实。只有Apple 平板电脑在这一领域有自己的优势。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
182.5 Points ∼100% +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)
126.3 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (84.1 - 126.3, n=10)
109.2 Points ∼60% -14%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
108.3 Points ∼59% -14%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
94 Points ∼52% -26%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 184.3, n=34, last 2 years)
78.5 Points ∼43% -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
72.8 Points ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
55.3 Points ∼30% -56%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
403.4 Points ∼100% +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)
230.8 Points ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)
195.6 Points ∼48% -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
184.5 Points ∼46% -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
171.2 Points ∼42% -26%
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=41, last 2 years)
140.2 Points ∼35% -39%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
126.4 Points ∼31% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
93.4 Points ∼23% -60%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
221 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)
173 Points ∼78%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
155 Points ∼70% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (119 - 193, n=9)
154.7 Points ∼70% -11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
134 Points ∼61% -23%
Average of class Tablet (24 - 254, n=42, last 2 years)
100.9 Points ∼46% -42%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
97 Points ∼44% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
83 Points ∼38% -52%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
210 runs/min ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)
119 runs/min ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (73.5 - 129.3, n=10)
112.5 runs/min ∼54% -5%
Average of class Tablet (12.2 - 255, n=33, last 2 years)
81.9 runs/min ∼39% -31%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chome 92)
74.2 runs/min ∼35% -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
72.1 runs/min ∼34% -39%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
65.5 runs/min ∼31% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
43.09 runs/min ∼21% -64%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
62789 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)
48281 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (29750 - 50626, n=10)
43002 Points ∼68% -11%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
41256 Points ∼66% -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
33694 Points ∼54% -30%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
24616 Points ∼39% -49%
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=40, last 2 years)
24616 Points ∼39% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
17823 Points ∼28% -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=43, last 2 years)
3981 ms * ∼100% -374%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
2403 ms * ∼60% -186%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
1629 ms * ∼41% -94%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)
1158 ms * ∼29% -38%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
1055 ms * ∼27% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (819 - 1330, n=10)
964 ms * ∼24% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)
839 ms * ∼21%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
495 ms * ∼12% +41%

* ... smaller is better

三星平板电脑使用快速的UFS 3.1内存:在测试中确认了体面的速度。只有连续写入数据的速度可以更高。然而,在日常使用中,这只有在与更快的竞争对手直接比较时才会明显。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 UltraSamsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5GLenovo Tab P12 ProHuawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021Lenovo Yoga Tab 13Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
8%
79%
4%
25%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
1817
861
-53%
1782
-2%
2031
12%
1431
-21%
1771 ?(1330 - 2037, n=42)
-3%
685 ?(123.3 - 2031, n=39, last 2 years)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
451.6
512
13%
758
68%
1559
245%
711
57%
899 ?(452 - 1559, n=42)
99%
362 ?(67.4 - 1559, n=39, last 2 years)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
238
192
-19%
232.5
-2%
310
30%
249.1
5%
260 ?(181 - 325, n=42)
9%
118.6 ?(10.1 - 310, n=39, last 2 years)
-50%
Random Write 4KB
284.9
167.5
-41%
189.2
-34%
369.7
30%
215.2
-24%
264 ?(218 - 449, n=43)
-7%
103.8 ?(4.27 - 370, n=39, last 2 years)
-64%

游戏。 Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑变成了一个体面的玩伴

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑搭载了性能强劲的高通Adreno 730,我们与合作伙伴 GameBench一起确认了这一点。.

尽管显示分辨率很高,但要求很高的游戏,如《PUBG Mobile》,可以在持续的40 FPS下完全运行。即使你稍微降低细节水平,你仍然可以达到60 FPS。在《荒野大镖客》中,三星平板电脑以恒定的60FPS运行,但90或120赫兹的HFR设置不可用。

这款平板电脑超过700克,长时间拿着相当重,所以我们在玩的时候把S8 Ultra支在腿上或桌子边上。作为回报,巨大的屏幕表面提供了一个很好的概述,四个扬声器创造了一个吸引人的氛围。


英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.1.0.5408: Ø60.4 (55-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø58.9 (50-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.9.0: Ø39.9 (36-42)

排放。良好的扬声器

温度

当在最大显示亮度下空转时,三星Galaxy S8 Ultra只略微发热。即使在恒定的负载下,它也只是部分超过30度的标志。

我们用3DMark压力测试对该平板电脑的高端SoC的性能稳定性进行了测试。尽管表面积很大,但S8 Ultra无法保持性能恒定,并像大多数同样依赖骁龙8代的智能手机一样节流到类似水平。 另一方面,三星平板电脑在压力测试开始时总是比采用前代芯片组的同类产品快,并在较长时间内产生几乎两倍的帧数。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø40.4 (34.9-53.1)
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.55-14.1)
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø7.3 (7.29-7.33)
Max. Load
 33.7 °C32.4 °C28.3 °C 
 28.7 °C29.6 °C27.5 °C 
 30.1 °C29.6 °C27.7 °C 
Maximum: 33.7 °C
Average: 29.7 °C
27.6 °C27.6 °C29.9 °C
26.3 °C27.7 °C27.8 °C
25.3 °C26.8 °C26 °C
Maximum: 29.9 °C
Average: 27.2 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.

发言人

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的四个扬声器支持杜比全景声,并由AKG进行了微调。声音非常平衡,但可以有更多的深度。总的来说,对于平板电脑来说,声音输出是非常好的。

没有音频插孔,所以如果你想连接模拟耳机或扬声器,你必须使用一个可选的USB适配器。另外,声音也可以通过蓝牙输出。然而,与三星的惯例一样,音频编解码器的选择非常有限,只有SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC可用。当同时流向两个蓝牙接收器时,只能使用SBC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.429.8252828.63132.624.94027.723.3503434.86327268023.636.810022.340.312517.748.716016.163.120012.861.525013.1663151271.5400970.75001171.663010.772.580010.373.7100010.974.3125012.168.8160011.867.620001269.1250011.873.2315011.981.3400012.980.7500013.374.8630013.477800013.575.91000013.677.21250014.8701600014.160.1SPL24.688N0.677median 12.8median 71.5Delta1.15.349.348.943.950.537.142.237.943.643.848.131.835.72839.627.95323.557.123.861.119.664.3196917.57415.274.516.877.72179.122.382.518.781.717.380.915.880.715.872.817.464.918.469.820.277.120.377.420.17721.476.621.870.521.369.421.86631.689.91.688median 20.1median 741.85.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 UltraLenovo Tab P12 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理。 Galaxy 拥有11.200毫安时的S8 Ultra平板电脑

消耗功率

在功耗方面,事实证明大显示屏非常耗电,空转时需要比Galaxy S8平板电脑多出60%以上的能量,但几乎与S8+持平。然而,在高峰负荷时,Ultra平板电脑是相当经济的。

S8 Ultra平板电脑支持高达45瓦的有线充电,可以在一个半小时左右将电池充满。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.18 / 3.84 / 3.88 Watt
Load midlight 8.04 / 10.44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
11200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
10200 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
10050 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10000 mAh
Power Consumption
-12%
17%
-78%
-67%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
3.18
1.06
67%
2.2
31%
6.2
-95%
1.8
43%
3
6%
Idle Average *
3.84
6.25
-63%
2.6
32%
9.07
-136%
9.6
-150%
3.4
11%
Idle Maximum *
3.88
6.3
-62%
3.2
18%
9.12
-135%
9.8
-153%
4.1
-6%
Load Average *
8.04
8.76
-9%
7.1
12%
8.79
-9%
12.2
-52%
9.9
-23%
Load Maximum *
10.44
9.54
9%
11.5
-10%
12.07
-16%
12.6
-21%
13.8
-32%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø9.1 (3.64-15.9)
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø6.84 (2.48-12.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.2 (13.4-15.6)
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.67 (8.92-10.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø3.39 (3.33-4.04)
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 1min: Ø2.7 (2.52-3.42)

电池寿命

功耗测量值已经表明,关于三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑的电池寿命,不应期望有什么超级大奖。考虑到大面板,调整显示亮度(150cd/m²)的测试结果很好,但与较小面板的竞争对手相比,明显较弱。

然而,这似乎也是由于耗能的Wi-Fi模块(如Wi-Fi测试中所示),因为在负载下确定的数值并没有低很多。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 49min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 99)
8h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 27min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
11200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
10200 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
10050 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
85%
7%
65%
7%
83%
Reader / Idle
949
2485
162%
1034
9%
2080
119%
2536
167%
H.264
651
1249
92%
892
37%
1367
110%
818
26%
1199
84%
WiFi v1.3
521
1020
96%
627
20%
740
42%
673
29%
1056
103%
Load
387
342
-12%
236
-39%
342
-12%
255
-34%
306
-21%

Pros

+ 巨大的AMOLED显示屏,精确的色彩管理
+ 惊人的性能
+ 可扩展的内存
+ 包括S-Pen
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 电池寿命一般
- 没有自适应刷新率
- 缺少蓝牙的音频编解码器

评语:强大的巨型平板电脑,几乎没有弱点

在审查中。三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。
在审查中。三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。

三星Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑拥有14.6英寸Super AMOLED显示屏,在最真实的意义上是一个真正的吸引眼球的东西。但它的优势不仅是美学上的。快速的Snapdragon确保了所有领域的卓越性能,扬声器提供了良好的声音,DeX模式可以直接在设备上运行,而摄像头非常适合视频通话。

那些寻找具有大显示屏的高端平板电脑的人,不需要再去找Galaxy S8 Ultra平板电脑。

另一个实用的功能是,S8 Ultra平板电脑可以作为Windows PC的第二个屏幕使用,完全不需要任何电缆,但有轻微的延迟。强大的S-Pen也包含在交货中。使用microSD卡可以进一步扩展内存,这就是为什么在为平板电脑选择合适的内存配置时,内存配置应该是主要考虑因素。

三星平板电脑没有提供太多值得批评的地方。对刷新率的自适应控制肯定是可取的,而且必须对电池寿命做出妥协,这当然可以通过更新来改善。额外的防尘和防水保护也可以成为一个独特的卖点。

如果你能接受一个较小的显示屏,那么 Apple iPad Pro 12.9不一定更贵,而且拥有更大范围的优化应用程序。价格较低的是 联想Tab P12 Pro,它也允许笔输入,但与三星和Apple 相比,工作起来没有那么准确。