Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), 04/25/2019
Android ARM Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen

矮人星系—— 三星较小版本的顶级S10型号定价比S10 +更具吸引力。除了较小的显示屏外,还有一个电池容量也更低,减少了一个前置摄像头以及有着更少的内部存储空间。 同样,没有像S10+那样的陶瓷背板选项。 请继续阅读,了解Galaxy S10与其竞品的比较以及它如何与其他现代旗舰产品竞争。

Samsung Galaxy S10 (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9820
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.1 inch 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 551 PPI, 10点触控, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米组合耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: 最多512 GB microSD卡; 支持FAT,FAT32和exFAT文件系统, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计,气压计,陀螺仪传感器,地磁传感器,霍尔传感器,心率传感器,接近传感器, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100 and AWS. LTE Cat. 20: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1,500, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,300, 2,500, 2,600 MHz, AWS and AWS-3., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 149.9 x 70.4
Battery
12.71 Wh, 3400 mAh Lithium-Ion, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Qi 无线充电
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 双像素自动对焦,77°,f / 1.5和f /2.4,1.4μm,OIS。 12 MPix远摄,2倍放大倍率,PDAF,45°,f / 2.4,OIS。 16 MPix超广角,固定焦距,123°,f / 2.2),超高清视频
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix 双像素自动对焦,80°,f / 1.9; Camera2 API: Full
Additional features
Speakers: 双扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 充电器,USB线,2个OTG适配器,AKG耳机,快速入门指南,安全说明, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证,SAR值:Body - 1.582 W / kg,Head - 0.516 W , fanless
Weight
157 g, Power Supply: 57 g
Price
5999元 ~ 899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The Galaxy S10+ next to its smaller sibling, the Galaxy S10

Size Comparison

158 mm 73 mm 9.9 mm 193 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g155 mm 73.88 mm 7.65 mm 174 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g147.7 mm 68.7 mm 8.5 mm 163 g143.6 mm 70.9 mm 7.7 mm 177 g140.9 mm 72.97 mm 7.5 mm 176 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼94%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼94% -1%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼92% -2%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
278 MBit/s ∼41% -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=423)
224 MBit/s ∼33% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼99%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
550 MBit/s ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼82% -16%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼81% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼74% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=423)
214 MBit/s ∼36% -63%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10 - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10 - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10 - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10 - Loop
Photo taken with the ultra-wide-angle lens
Photo taken with the standard lens
Photo taken with the telephoto lens

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Our test chart photographed with the standard camera
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart photographed with the ultra-wide-angle lens
Our test chart photographed with the telephoto lens
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
709
cd/m²
698
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
713
cd/m²
707
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Curved Dynamic AMOLED
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 713 cd/m² Average: 705 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 701 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Screen
10%
12%
-5%
4%
-62%
15%
Brightness middle
701
529
-25%
639
-9%
437
-38%
567
-19%
543
-23%
569
-19%
Brightness
705
527
-25%
637
-10%
442
-37%
559
-21%
542
-23%
578
-18%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
94
-4%
95
-3%
89
-9%
92
-6%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.7
1.4
62%
1
73%
2.21
40%
3.3
11%
6.6
-78%
1.3
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.3
4
61%
2.2
79%
4.27
59%
6.1
41%
11
-7%
2.1
80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
2.2
-57%
2.1
-50%
1.1
21%
4.7
-236%
1.6
-14%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.16 102%
1.9 116%
2.307 95%
2.46 89%
1.835 120%
2.31 95%
CCT
6553 99%
6358 102%
6364 102%
6353 102%
6495 100%
6817 95%
6401 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10128 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6219 Points ∼46% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼55% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
8025 Points ∼59% -21%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7865 Points ∼58% -22%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼99% +32%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13519 Points ∼100% +33%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
13194 Points ∼98% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10128 - 10192, n=4)
10167 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4676 Points ∼35% -54%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10162 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
8786 Points ∼76% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼95% +8%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11598 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
6756 Points ∼58% -34%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
6701 Points ∼58% -34%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼78% -11%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8687 Points ∼75% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7934 Points ∼68% -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10162 - 10553, n=4)
10366 Points ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=376)
4682 Points ∼40% -54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4499 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3688 Points ∼76% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼73% -22%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4824 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
1922 Points ∼40% -57%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
1952 Points ∼40% -57%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼49% -47%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2397 Points ∼50% -47%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2272 Points ∼47% -49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4499 - 4529, n=4)
4510 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=376)
1413 Points ∼29% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
5291 Points ∼59% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
6982 Points ∼77% -8%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7193 Points ∼80% -5%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼94% +12%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8141 Points ∼90% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7595 - 7966, n=4)
7769 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=367)
5225 Points ∼58% -31%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
5736 Points ∼50% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼96% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
8115 Points ∼71% -17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7925 Points ∼69% -19%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼92% +9%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10361 Points ∼90% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11474 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (9557 - 10008, n=4)
9777 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=538)
5652 Points ∼49% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2590 Points ∼69% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2998 Points ∼80% +1%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2942 Points ∼78% -1%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2382 Points ∼63% -20%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼98% +23%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2809 Points ∼75% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3764 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2925 - 3480, n=4)
3123 Points ∼83% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=373)
1938 Points ∼51% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3697 Points ∼52% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +32%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5139 Points ∼73% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3109 Points ∼44% -42%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4187 Points ∼59% -22%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼83% +10%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4133 Points ∼58% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5810 Points ∼82% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5358 - 5418, n=4)
5379 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8206, n=373)
1701 Points ∼24% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3376 Points ∼57% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4436 Points ∼75% -3%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3070 Points ∼52% -33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3584 Points ∼61% -21%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼88% +14%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3741 Points ∼63% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5184 Points ∼88% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4529 - 4821, n=4)
4630 Points ∼78% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6312, n=374)
1589 Points ∼27% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2650 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2952 Points ∼78%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2940 Points ∼78%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2119 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼89%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3672 Points ∼97%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (3077 - 3513, n=3)
3226 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=403)
1857 Points ∼49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4843 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
14951 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3503 Points ∼23%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4514 Points ∼30%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼56%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6024 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8369 Points ∼56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4449 - 5307, n=3)
4881 Points ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=403)
2310 Points ∼15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4091 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7856 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3360 Points ∼43%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3608 Points ∼46%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼80%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4842 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6517 Points ∼83%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4052 - 4766, n=3)
4380 Points ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=403)
1944 Points ∼25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2486 Points ∼66% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +32%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2960 Points ∼79% +4%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2926 Points ∼78% +3%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2946 Points ∼78% +3%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼94% +24%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2740 Points ∼73% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3703 Points ∼99% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2854 - 3296, n=4)
3033 Points ∼81% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=453)
1847 Points ∼49% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3553 Points ∼56% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +23%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3712 Points ∼58% -28%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3017 Points ∼47% -42%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3926 Points ∼62% -24%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼82% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4275 Points ∼67% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5092 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5152 - 5206, n=4)
5180 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 6362, n=453)
1413 Points ∼22% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3244 Points ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3514 Points ∼64% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2996 Points ∼54% -32%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3656 Points ∼66% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼86% +8%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3802 Points ∼69% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4700 Points ∼85% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4383 - 4579, n=4)
4473 Points ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 5734, n=454)
1365 Points ∼25% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2600 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2885 Points ∼80%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2287 Points ∼63%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼96%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2731 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3603 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2875 - 3448, n=3)
3076 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=494)
1714 Points ∼47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4569 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3335 Points ∼33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4511 Points ∼45%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼83%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6439 Points ∼65%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8014 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4507 - 6058, n=3)
5289 Points ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1844 Points ∼19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3911 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3223 Points ∼45%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3709 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼88%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4947 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6300 Points ∼88%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4015 - 5186, n=3)
4555 Points ∼64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=496)
1603 Points ∼22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
31297 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
26851 Points ∼73% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼69% -19%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27400 Points ∼74% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
22441 Points ∼61% -28%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
21407 Points ∼58% -32%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼95% +12%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30418 Points ∼83% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
36794 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (31297 - 32308, n=4)
32016 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=655)
13978 Points ∼38% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
71292 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
48433 Points ∼30% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼67% +49%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
160199 Points ∼100% +125%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
33472 Points ∼21% -53%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
58018 Points ∼36% -19%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼53% +19%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
79818 Points ∼50% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83927 Points ∼52% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (66990 - 72022, n=4)
70156 Points ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=653)
21146 Points ∼13% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55524 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
41093 Points ∼53% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼81% +12%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77128 Points ∼100% +39%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
30176 Points ∼39% -46%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
42040 Points ∼55% -24%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼84% +16%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58651 Points ∼76% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
65330 Points ∼85% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (54087 - 56465, n=4)
55454 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=653)
17322 Points ∼22% -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
144 fps ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼67% +17%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
251 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
121 fps ∼48% -15%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
106 fps ∼42% -26%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼61% +6%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
105 fps ∼42% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
152 fps ∼61% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (96 - 143, n=4)
119 fps ∼47% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=677)
36.9 fps ∼15% -74%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (58 - 60, n=4)
59.3 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=686)
27.7 fps ∼46% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
73 fps ∼63% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼87% +18%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
115 fps ∼100% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
61 fps ∼53% -28%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
54 fps ∼47% -36%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼51% -31%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼51% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83 fps ∼72% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (67 - 85, n=4)
80.5 fps ∼70% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=583)
21.1 fps ∼18% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
45 fps ∼75% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
54 fps ∼90% +2%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
37 fps ∼62% -30%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +11%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼55% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
50 fps ∼83% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 59, n=4)
54.5 fps ∼91% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=592)
19 fps ∼32% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
46 fps ∼67% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
62 fps ∼90% +17%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
39 fps ∼57% -26%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -23%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼86% +11%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
57 fps ∼83% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 67, n=4)
60 fps ∼87% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=449)
17.3 fps ∼25% -67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
24 fps ∼41% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +93%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼83% +60%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
36 fps ∼62% +20%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
24 fps ∼41% -20%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼91% +77%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼36% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (30 - 53, n=4)
39.3 fps ∼68% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=451)
16.4 fps ∼28% -45%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼69% +50%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
35 fps ∼100% +119%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
14 fps ∼40% -12%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼63% +38%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼34% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps ∼40% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 28, n=4)
19 fps ∼54% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=167)
9.89 fps ∼28% -38%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼73% -6%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
22 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
8.6 fps ∼39% -49%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼64% -18%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼55% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps ∼64% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 17, n=4)
16.8 fps ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=166)
6.84 fps ∼31% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼90% +48%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
41 fps ∼100% +64%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
23 fps ∼56% -8%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼83% +36%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
16 fps ∼39% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
21 fps ∼51% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 26, n=4)
23.3 fps ∼57% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=171)
14.4 fps ∼35% -42%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼85% -7%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +9%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
23 fps ∼48% -48%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼77% -16%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30 fps ∼63% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps ∼77% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (41 - 46, n=4)
44.3 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=171)
16 fps ∼33% -64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
28 fps ∼67% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +20%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
38 fps ∼90% +9%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
23 fps ∼55% -34%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
26 fps ∼62% -26%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼83% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼62% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35 fps ∼83% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (35 - 43, n=4)
41 fps ∼98% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=374)
11.8 fps ∼28% -66%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
14 fps ∼37% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +65%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼82% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
22 fps ∼58% -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
15 fps ∼39% -35%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼82% +35%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼34% -43%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
19 fps ∼50% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (23 - 40, n=4)
27.3 fps ∼72% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=378)
10.6 fps ∼28% -54%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
24.45 (min: 9.63, max: 65.63) fps ∼65% -26%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35.34 fps ∼94% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (32.3 - 33, n=3)
32.6 fps ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼45% -49%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
10.52 (min: 5, max: 27.66) fps ∼33% -61%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29.68 fps ∼92% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)
30.2 fps ∼94% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼44% -48%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼93% -7%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
11.8 (min: 5.55, max: 28.23) fps ∼31% -69%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32.86 fps ∼85% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)
38.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼45% -54%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
328111 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
243861 Points ∼65% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
348178 Points ∼93% +6%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
207959 Points ∼55% -37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
209729 Points ∼56% -36%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼79% -10%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
270884 Points ∼72% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
292268 Points ∼78% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (327454 - 333277, n=4)
329572 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 459850, n=285)
139075 Points ∼37% -58%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
269219 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
217950 Points ∼79% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
257246 Points ∼94% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
179709 Points ∼65% -33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
185487 Points ∼67% -31%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼83% -15%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
229374 Points ∼83% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
226853 Points ∼82% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (269219 - 283270, n=4)
275038 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=489)
87523 Points ∼32% -67%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
1980 Score ∼40%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4716 Score ∼95%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
4967 Score ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=57)
2139 Score ∼43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
1099 Points ∼64% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼81% -1%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1711 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
1273 Points ∼74% -8%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
1202 Points ∼70% -13%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼82% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1228 Points ∼72% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1390 Points ∼81% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1012 - 1439, n=4)
1305 Points ∼76% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼44% -46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6373 Points ∼40% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼58% +26%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15875 Points ∼100% +116%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3725 Points ∼23% -49%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
6084 Points ∼38% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼50% +8%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6726 Points ∼42% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7989 Points ∼50% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7361 - 8981, n=4)
8307 Points ∼52% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼13% -73%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2669 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4169 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
4050 Points ∼89% -11%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3162 Points ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼95% -5%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2910 Points ∼64% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2317 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4306 - 4570, n=4)
4463 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼33% -67%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6234 Points ∼51% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼69% +13%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
12202 Points ∼100% +63%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
5965 Points ∼49% -20%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
5888 Points ∼48% -21%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼67% +9%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6717 Points ∼55% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8135 Points ∼67% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7476 - 8344, n=4)
7861 Points ∼64% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼24% -61%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3285 Points ∼54% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼75% +6%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6097 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3271 Points ∼54% -24%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3416 Points ∼56% -21%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼73% +3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3565 Points ∼58% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3804 Points ∼62% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4226 - 4548, n=4)
4404 Points ∼72% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=621)
1460 Points ∼24% -66%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1927 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
1436 Points ∼55% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼54% -27%
Apple iPhone XS
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2606 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
887 Points ∼34% -54%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1201 Points ∼46% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1927 - 1937, n=3)
1931 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
730 Points ∼28% -62%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
272.3 Points ∼100% +224%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
110.54 Points ∼41% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3)
88.9 Points ∼33% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
87.883 Points ∼32% +5%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼32% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
84.005 Points ∼31%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
82.61 Points ∼30% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.721 Points ∼25% -19%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
62.157 Points ∼23% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼21% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 273, n=518)
39.6 Points ∼15% -53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
43280 Points ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼57% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4)
20121 Points ∼46% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
16982 Points ∼39% -16%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
15906 Points ∼37% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points ∼35% -25%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼27% -43%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
11544 Points ∼27% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 43280, n=677)
6450 Points ∼15% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼100% -455%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
4812.6 ms * ∼45% -150%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼36% -100%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
2361 ms * ∼22% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
2295 ms * ∼21% -19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼21% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2077.8 ms * ∼19% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4)
1961 ms * ∼18% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +3%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
609.1 ms * ∼6% +68%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
159 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2)
115 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼68%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
98 Points ∼62%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
94 Points ∼59%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
77 Points ∼48%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=150)
64.2 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S9
63 Points ∼40%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
345 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
325 Points ∼94%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)
310 Points ∼90% -5%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
267 Points ∼77% -18%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼75% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
238 Points ∼69% -27%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
204 Points ∼59% -37%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼53% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points ∼47% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=328)
122 Points ∼35% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Points ∼0% -100%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S10Samsung Galaxy S9Huawei P20 ProNokia 8 SiroccoLG V40 ThinQSony Xperia XZ3OnePlus 6TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
0%
141%
-2%
-2%
-23%
-4%
41%
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
30.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
-5%
49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=410)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
34.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-56%
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
-1%
67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=410)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
24.44
23.07
-6%
160.49
557%
22.4
-8%
23.36
-4%
22.22
-9%
22
-10%
86.8 (18.2 - 250, n=39)
255%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-13%
Random Read 4KB
137.4
131
-5%
144.33
5%
140.7
2%
130.13
-5%
135.67
-1%
138.5
1%
139 (98.9 - 158, n=39)
1%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.24
206.94
7%
196.69
2%
211.6
10%
203.92
6%
196.14
2%
204.4
6%
205 (182 - 503, n=39)
6%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
831.94
815.43
-2%
831.82
0%
737.5
-11%
689.59
-17%
680.98
-18%
735.3
-12%
751 (427 - 912, n=39)
-10%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-68%
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060Tooltip
; Smooth; 0.11.0: Ø57.1 (20-60)
; Balanced; 0.11.0: Ø38.7 (19-41)
; HD; 0.11.0: Ø39.1 (11-42)
Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.7 (45-60)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø59.7 (59-60)
Max. Load
 35.4 °C34.3 °C34.6 °C 
 35.1 °C35.6 °C36.2 °C 
 34.5 °C35.8 °C37.4 °C 
Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 35.4 °C
32.9 °C34.2 °C34.3 °C
31.9 °C36.3 °C36.5 °C
32.7 °C37.3 °C35.7 °C
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.434.72528.327.13118.722.14026.726.35033.235.76322.629.28021.824.210024.423.912523.834.916018.551.820017.151.525017.858.931515.561.340014.164.55001468.863013.86780014.770.8100015.473.4125015.275.3160014.375.5200014.576.4250013.977.4315014.678.7400014.180.3500014.377.5630014.575.2800014.871.61000014.866.81250014.861160001555.4SPL26.888N0.872median 14.8median 68.8Delta1.510.23030.130.123.529.328.426.92632.826.624.824.520.723.219.535.718.644.221.451.72552.617.454.516.255.418.458.215.461.713.56513.764.213.768.414.673.414.975.914.476.414.777.114.677.414.878.314.776.914.676.51575.614.966.915.159.614.951.827.287.30.967.5median 14.9median 651.411.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S10Apple iPhone XS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.07 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.27 / 1.3 Watt
Load midlight 6.17 / 8.55 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
-0%
10%
5%
-5%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.65
-7%
0.95
-56%
0.84
-38%
0.67
-10%
0.87
-43%
0.8
-31%
Idle Average *
1.27
0.81
36%
1.34
-6%
1.54
-21%
1.26
1%
1.39
-9%
1.2
6%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
0.92
29%
1.48
-14%
1.57
-21%
1.29
1%
1.41
-8%
1.5
-15%
Load Average *
6.17
4.76
23%
4
35%
2.47
60%
3.71
40%
3.96
36%
4.8
22%
Load Maximum *
8.55
5.16
40%
5.13
40%
2.49
71%
9.3
-9%
8.6
-1%
6.2
27%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 59min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
7h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 50min
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Nokia 8 Sirocco
3260 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
52%
40%
19%
-8%
55%
Reader / Idle
1259
1182
-6%
1727
37%
1603
27%
1140
-9%
1270
1%
1936
54%
H.264
842
609
-28%
784
-7%
725
-14%
659
-22%
420
-50%
903
7%
WiFi v1.3
427
474
11%
744
74%
693
62%
510
19%
419
-2%
865
103%
Load
170
164
-4%
345
103%
317
86%
320
88%
202
19%
261
54%

Pros

+ 优秀的设计
+ 上乘的做工
+ 强大的SoC
+ 充足的RAM和内部存储空间
+ microSD卡支持
+ DUOS型号的双SIM卡功能
+ 相机表现出色
+ 优秀的OLED面板
+ 防水防尘
+ USB 3.1支持DP,HDMI和OTG
+ 不错的立体声扬声器
+ 超声波屏下指纹传感器
+ 无线充电

Cons

- 一般的续航表现
- 没有eSIM
- 不安全且令人失望的面部识别
- SoC在高负载下有降频现象
- PWM调光
- 没有aptX HD支持
三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测 (SM-G973). Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测 (SM-G973). Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

三星Galaxy S10是迄今为止我们评测过的两款S10机型中最好的。与Galaxy S10 +相比,S10在人体工程学方面更加优越,但其续航时间仍然令人失望。如果您需要一台可以续航一整天的智能手机,我们不会建议您选择S10。

尽管如此,S10较差的续航不足以阻止它成为一款出色的智能手机。三星为该设备配备了许多其竞争对手所没有的功能,而其屏幕和做工堪称典范。它的双向无线充电可能是一种噱头,但其耳机插孔和可扩展存储使S10与其同时代的产品区别明显。此外,它的双蓝牙5.0非常有用,其大量存储选项也很有用。超声波指纹传感器也很棒,并且比目前市场上的其他屏下指纹要好得多。

Exynos 9820也可以媲美其他旗舰SoC,而S10和S10 +是首批支持新Wi-Fi 6标准的智能手机之一。不幸的是,S10支持相对较少的LTE频段,我们也很难理解三星对aptX HD的坚持。

三星Galaxy S10是一款出色的旗舰智能手机,几乎没有什么弱点。尽管如此,它几乎没有任何新意,它一般的续航表现会让一些人失望。

S10也有很棒的相机,新的超广角传感器将成为许多人的心头好。然而,这三代Galaxy S系列在相机技术上没有任何巨大的飞跃,而三星的竞争对手现在已经赶上甚至超过了它。简而言之,Galaxy S10是可以买到的最好的智能手机之一,但它并没有像它的前辈那样从竞争中脱颖而出。

Samsung Galaxy S10 - 09/11/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
94%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
98%
Connectivity
67 / 70 → 96%
Weight
92%
Battery
82%
Display
88%
Games Performance
50 / 64 → 77%
Application Performance
73 / 86 → 85%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
78%
Average
81%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-04-25 (Update: 2019-04-25)