三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy S10
Brand: Samsung

矮人星系—— 三星较小版本的顶级S10型号定价比S10 +更具吸引力。除了较小的显示屏外，还有一个电池容量也更低，减少了一个前置摄像头以及有着更少的内部存储空间。同样，没有像S10+那样的陶瓷背板选项。请继续阅读，了解Galaxy S10与其竞品的比较以及它如何与其他现代旗舰产品竞争。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 04/25/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S10 (Galaxy S Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9820 8 x 1.9 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.10 inch 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 551 PPI, 10点触控, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 108.5 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米组合耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: 最多512 GB microSD卡; 支持FAT，FAT32和exFAT文件系统, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，气压计，陀螺仪传感器，地磁传感器，霍尔传感器，心率传感器，接近传感器, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100 and AWS. LTE Cat. 20: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1,500, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,300, 2,500, 2,600 MHz, AWS and AWS-3., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 149.9 x 70.4

Battery

12.71 Wh, 3400 mAh Lithium-Ion, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Qi 无线充电

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 双像素自动对焦，77°，f / 1.5和f /2.4,1.4μm，OIS。 12 MPix远摄，2倍放大倍率，PDAF，45°，f / 2.4，OIS。 16 MPix超广角，固定焦距，123°，f / 2.2），超高清视频
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix 双像素自动对焦，80°，f / 1.9; Camera2 API: Full

Additional features

Speakers: 双扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 充电器，USB线，2个OTG适配器，AKG耳机，快速入门指南，安全说明, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证，SAR值：Body - 1.582 W / kg，Head - 0.516 W , fanless

Weight

157 g, Power Supply: 57 g

Price

5999 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

The Galaxy S10+ next to its smaller sibling, the Galaxy S10

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	587 MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (558^min - 592^max) MBit/s
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (492^min - 579^max) MBit/s -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	550 MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	484 (382^min - 499^max) MBit/s -16%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	474 (241^min - 497^max) MBit/s -18%
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	437 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +6%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 (655^min - 698^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s +2%
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	650 MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (612^min - 683^max) MBit/s
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	635 MBit/s -1%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	629 (621^min - 638^max) MBit/s -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	624 (593^min - 636^max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -41%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	278 MBit/s -56%

Samsung Galaxy S10; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø639 (612-683)

Samsung Galaxy S10; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (558-592)

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10 – Cycling around a lake

Photo taken with the ultra-wide-angle lens

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Our test chart photographed with the ultra-wide-angle lens

Our test chart photographed with the telephoto lens

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


709 cd/m²	698 cd/m²	708 cd/m²
702 cd/m²	701 cd/m²	702 cd/m²
713 cd/m²	707 cd/m²	705 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Curved Dynamic AMOLED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 713 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 705 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 701 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1

	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.10	Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80	Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.80	OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41	LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.40	Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00	Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.10
Screen		10%	12%	-5%	4%	-62%	15%
Brightness middle	701	529 -25%	639 -9%	437 -38%	567 -19%	543 -23%	569 -19%
Brightness	705	527 -25%	637 -10%	442 -37%	559 -21%	542 -23%	578 -18%
Brightness Distribution	98	96 -2%	94 -4%	95 -3%	89 -9%	92 -6%	95 -3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.7	1.4 62%	1 73%	2.21 40%	3.3 11%	6.6 -78%	1.3 65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.3	4 61%	2.2 79%	4.27 59%	6.1 41%	11 -7%	2.1 80%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	1.6 -14%	2.2 -57%	2.1 -50%	1.1 21%	4.7 -236%	1.6 -14%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.16 ^102%	1.9 ^116%	2.307 ^95%	2.46 ^89%	1.835 ^120%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	6553 ^99%	6358 ^102%	6364 ^102%	6353 ^102%	6495 ^100%	6817 ^95%	6401 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4499 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3688 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points -22%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4824 Points +7%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1922 Points -57%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	1952 Points -57%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2384 Points -47%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2397 Points -47%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2272 Points -49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4499 - 4529, n=4)	4510 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +16%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10162 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	8786 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +8%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11598 Points +14%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	6756 Points -34%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	6701 Points -34%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8995 Points -11%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8687 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7934 Points -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10162 - 10553, n=4)	10366 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +38%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10128 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6219 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points -26%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8025 Points -21%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7865 Points -22%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13341 Points +32%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13519 Points +33%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13194 Points +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10128 - 10192, n=4)	10167 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +7%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9750 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	5736 Points -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points +13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8115 Points -17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7925 Points -19%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10590 Points +9%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10361 Points +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11474 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (9557 - 10008, n=4)	9777 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +55%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7595 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	5291 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points +19%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	6982 Points -8%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7193 Points -5%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8487 Points +12%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8141 Points +7%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7595 - 7966, n=4)	7769 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +43%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55524 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	41093 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +12%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77128 Points +39%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	30176 Points -46%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	42040 Points -24%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64534 Points +16%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58651 Points +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	65330 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54087 - 56465, n=4)	55454 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	71292 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	48433 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +49%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	160199 Points +125%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	33472 Points -53%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	58018 Points -19%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	84998 Points +19%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	79818 Points +12%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83927 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (66990 - 72022, n=4)	70156 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	31297 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	26851 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points -19%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27400 Points -12%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	22441 Points -28%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	21407 Points -32%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35022 Points +12%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30418 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	36794 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (31297 - 32308, n=4)	32016 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3911 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3223 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3709 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6336 Points
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4947 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6300 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4015 - 5186, n=3)	4555 Points
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4569 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3335 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4511 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8272 Points
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6439 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8014 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4507 - 6058, n=3)	5289 Points
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2600 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2885 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2287 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3483 Points
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2731 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3603 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2875 - 3448, n=3)	3076 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4091 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7856 Points
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3360 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3608 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6310 Points
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4842 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6517 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4052 - 4766, n=3)	4380 Points
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4843 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	14951 Points
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3503 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4514 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8397 Points
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6024 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8369 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4449 - 5307, n=3)	4881 Points
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2650 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2952 Points
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2940 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2119 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3374 Points
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3672 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (3077 - 3513, n=3)	3226 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4383 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3244 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +26%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3514 Points -20%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2996 Points -32%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3656 Points -17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points +8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3802 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4700 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4383 - 4579, n=4)	4473 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)	2767 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5176 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3553 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +23%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3712 Points -28%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3017 Points -42%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3926 Points -24%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5241 Points +1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4275 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5092 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5152 - 5206, n=4)	5180 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)	2765 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2854 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2486 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points +32%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2960 Points +4%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2926 Points +3%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2946 Points +3%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3537 Points +24%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2740 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3703 Points +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2854 - 3296, n=4)	3033 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)	3168 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4551 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3376 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +30%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4436 Points -3%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3070 Points -33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3584 Points -21%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5189 Points +14%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3741 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5184 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4529 - 4821, n=4)	4630 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=181, last 2 years)	6766 Points +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5358 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3697 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +32%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5139 Points -4%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3109 Points -42%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4187 Points -22%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5877 Points +10%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4133 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5810 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5358 - 5418, n=4)	5379 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=180, last 2 years)	9771 Points +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2981 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2590 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points +26%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2998 Points +1%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2942 Points -1%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2382 Points -20%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3681 Points +23%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2809 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3764 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2925 - 3480, n=4)	3123 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=180, last 2 years)	4232 Points +42%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	60 fps 0%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (58 - 60, n=4)	59.3 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	143 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	144 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +17%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	251 fps +76%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	121 fps -15%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	106 fps -26%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	152 fps +6%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	105 fps -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	152 fps +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (96 - 143, n=4)	119.3 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +73%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	45 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +13%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	54 fps +2%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	37 fps -30%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +11%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps -38%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	50 fps -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 59, n=4)	54.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +36%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	73 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +18%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	115 fps +35%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	61 fps -28%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	54 fps -36%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -31%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -31%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83 fps -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (67 - 85, n=4)	80.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +65%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	30 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	24 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +93%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps +60%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	36 fps +20%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	24 fps -20%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps +77%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps -30%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	31 fps +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (30 - 53, n=4)	39.3 fps +31%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +103%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	46 fps -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +30%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	62 fps +17%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	39 fps -26%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	41 fps -23%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +11%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	41 fps -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	57 fps +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 67, n=4)	60 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +87%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	14 fps -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +65%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +35%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	22 fps -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	15 fps -35%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps +35%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps -43%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	19 fps -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (23 - 40, n=4)	27.3 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +89%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	28 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +20%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	38 fps +9%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps -34%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	26 fps -26%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	35 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (35 - 43, n=4)	41 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +71%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	25 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +48%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	41 fps +64%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps -8%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps +36%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	16 fps -36%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	21 fps -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 26, n=4)	23.3 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)	44.2 fps +77%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	44 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps -7%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps +9%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps -48%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps -16%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30 fps -32%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	37 fps -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (41 - 46, n=4)	44.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)	64.5 fps +47%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +50%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	35 fps +119%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	14 fps -12%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +38%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps -25%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 28, n=4)	19 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +106%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps -6%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	22 fps +29%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8.6 fps -49%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps -18%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 17, n=4)	16.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)	25.7 fps +51%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.35 (8.77^min - 77.53^max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps -7%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	11.8 (5.55^min - 28.23^max) fps -69%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32.86 fps -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)	38.5 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.16 (8.36^min - 61.33^max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +19%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	10.52 (5^min - 27.66^max) fps -61%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	29.68 fps +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)	30.2 fps +11%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	33.04 (9.22^min - 75.78^max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps +13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	24.45 (9.63^min - 65.63^max) fps -26%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35.34 fps +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3)	32.6 fps -1%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	328111 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	243861 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +14%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	348178 Points +6%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	207959 Points -37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	209729 Points -36%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	294488 Points -10%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	270884 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	292268 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (327454 - 333277, n=4)	329572 Points 0%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	269219 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	217950 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	257246 Points -4%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	179709 Points -33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	185487 Points -31%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	228939 Points -15%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	229374 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	226853 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (269219 - 283270, n=4)	275038 Points +2%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1980 Score
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4716 Score
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 ()	4967 Score
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4320 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3285 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points +6%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6097 Points +41%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3271 Points -24%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3416 Points -21%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4458 Points +3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3565 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3804 Points -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4226 - 4548, n=4)	4404 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +33%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7476 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6234 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +13%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	12202 Points +63%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	5965 Points -20%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	5888 Points -21%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8156 Points +9%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6717 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8135 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7476 - 8344, n=4)	7861 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +29%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4570 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2669 Points -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points -12%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4169 Points -9%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	4050 Points -11%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3162 Points -31%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4344 Points -5%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2910 Points -36%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2317 Points -49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4306 - 4570, n=4)	4463 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +37%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7361 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6373 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +26%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15875 Points +116%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3725 Points -49%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	6084 Points -17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7969 Points +8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6726 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7989 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7361 - 8981, n=4)	8307 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +92%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1385 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	1099 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1711 Points +24%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1273 Points -8%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	1202 Points -13%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1398 Points +1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1228 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1390 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1012 - 1439, n=4)	1305 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +8%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1927 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	1436 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points -27%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2606 Points +35%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	887 Points -54%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1201 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3)	1931 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years)	2240 Points +16%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	272.3 Points +224%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	110.5 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3)	88.9 Points +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	87.9 Points +5%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	86.1 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	84 Points
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	82.6 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	67.7 Points -19%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	62.2 Points -26%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	58.3 Points -31%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	43280 Points +113%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years)	33588 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20286 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4)	20121 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	16982 Points -16%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	16824 Points -17%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	15906 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	15233 Points -25%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	11584 Points -43%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	11544 Points -43%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	4813 ms * -150%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	3852 ms * -100%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	2361 ms * -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	2295 ms * -19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	2282 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2078 ms * -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4)	1961 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1924 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +17%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	609 ms * +68%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	159 Points
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2)	115 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	98 Points
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	94 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	77 Points
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	69 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9	63 Points

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	345 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	325 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)	310 Points -5%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	267 Points -18%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	260 Points -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	238 Points -27%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	204 Points -37%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	182 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	163 Points -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9	Points -100%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S10	Samsung Galaxy S9	Huawei P20 Pro	Nokia 8 Sirocco	LG V40 ThinQ	Sony Xperia XZ3	OnePlus 6T	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		0%	141%	-2%	-2%	-23%	-4%	81%	411%
Sequential Read 256KB	832	815 -2%	832 0%	738 -11%	690 -17%	681 -18%	735 -12%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) -9%	1502 ?(226 - 4512, n=216, last 2 years) 81%
Sequential Write 256KB	193.2	206.9 7%	196.7 2%	211.6 10%	203.9 6%	196.1 2%	204.4 6%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 54%	1111 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=216, last 2 years) 475%
Random Read 4KB	137.4	131 -5%	144.3 5%	140.7 2%	130.1 -5%	135.7 -1%	138.5 1%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 11%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=216, last 2 years) 80%
Random Write 4KB	24.44	23.07 -6%	160.5 557%	22.4 -8%	23.36 -4%	22.22 -9%	22 -10%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 438%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=216, last 2 years) 1009%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%			84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	34.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -56%		76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) -2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%			63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	30.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -53%		59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) -8%

PUBG Mobile

Samsung Galaxy S10; Smooth; 0.11.0: Ø57.1 (20-60)

Samsung Galaxy S10; Balanced; 0.11.0: Ø38.7 (19-41)

Samsung Galaxy S10; HD; 0.11.0: Ø39.1 (11-42)

Arena of Valor

Samsung Galaxy S10; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.7 (45-60)

Dead Trigger 2

Samsung Galaxy S10; 1.5.5: Ø59.7 (59-60)

Max. Load

Idle


35.4 °C	34.3 °C	34.6 °C
35.1 °C	35.6 °C	36.2 °C
34.5 °C	35.8 °C	37.4 °C

Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 35.4 °C


32.9 °C	34.2 °C	34.3 °C
31.9 °C	36.3 °C	36.5 °C
32.7 °C	37.3 °C	35.7 °C

Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.07 Watt
Idle	0.61 / 1.27 / 1.3 Watt
Load	6.17 / 8.55 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh	Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9820	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		24%	-0%	10%	5%	-5%	2%	-11%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	0.61	0.65 -7%	0.95 -56%	0.84 -38%	0.67 -10%	0.87 -43%	0.8 -31%	0.65 ?(0.6 - 0.73, n=4) -7%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -47%
Idle Average *	1.27	0.81 36%	1.34 -6%	1.54 -21%	1.26 1%	1.39 -9%	1.2 6%	1.455 ?(1.2 - 1.82, n=4) -15%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -14%
Idle Maximum *	1.3	0.92 29%	1.48 -14%	1.57 -21%	1.29 1%	1.41 -8%	1.5 -15%	1.675 ?(1.3 - 2.07, n=4) -29%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -25%
Load Average *	6.17	4.76 23%	4 35%	2.47 60%	3.71 40%	3.96 36%	4.8 22%	5.88 ?(5.2 - 6.17, n=4) 5%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 10%
Load Maximum *	8.55	5.16 40%	5.13 40%	2.49 71%	9.3 -9%	8.6 -1%	6.2 27%	9.44 ?(8.55 - 10.2, n=4) -10%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		20h 59min
WiFi Websurfing (Samsung Browser 9.0)		7h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 50min

	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh	Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	52%	40%	19%	-8%	55%
Reader / Idle	1259	1182 -6%	1727 37%	1603 27%	1140 -9%	1270 1%	1936 54%
H.264	842	609 -28%	784 -7%	725 -14%	659 -22%	420 -50%	903 7%
WiFi v1.3	427	474 11%	744 74%	693 62%	510 19%	419 -2%	865 103%
Load	170	164 -4%	345 103%	317 86%	320 88%	202 19%	261 54%

Pros

+ 优秀的设计

+ 上乘的做工

+ 强大的SoC

+ 充足的RAM和内部存储空间

+ microSD卡支持

+ DUOS型号的双SIM卡功能

+ 相机表现出色

+ 优秀的OLED面板

+ 防水防尘

+ USB 3.1支持DP，HDMI和OTG

+ 不错的立体声扬声器

+ 超声波屏下指纹传感器

+ 无线充电

Cons

- 一般的续航表现

- 没有eSIM

- 不安全且令人失望的面部识别

- SoC在高负载下有降频现象

- PWM调光

- 没有aptX HD支持

三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测 (SM-G973). Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

三星Galaxy S10是迄今为止我们评测过的两款S10机型中最好的。与Galaxy S10 +相比，S10在人体工程学方面更加优越，但其续航时间仍然令人失望。如果您需要一台可以续航一整天的智能手机，我们不会建议您选择S10。

尽管如此，S10较差的续航不足以阻止它成为一款出色的智能手机。三星为该设备配备了许多其竞争对手所没有的功能，而其屏幕和做工堪称典范。它的双向无线充电可能是一种噱头，但其耳机插孔和可扩展存储使S10与其同时代的产品区别明显。此外，它的双蓝牙5.0非常有用，其大量存储选项也很有用。超声波指纹传感器也很棒，并且比目前市场上的其他屏下指纹要好得多。

Exynos 9820也可以媲美其他旗舰SoC，而S10和S10 +是首批支持新Wi-Fi 6标准的智能手机之一。不幸的是，S10支持相对较少的LTE频段，我们也很难理解三星对aptX HD的坚持。

三星Galaxy S10是一款出色的旗舰智能手机，几乎没有什么弱点。尽管如此，它几乎没有任何新意，它一般的续航表现会让一些人失望。

S10也有很棒的相机，新的超广角传感器将成为许多人的心头好。然而，这三代Galaxy S系列在相机技术上没有任何巨大的飞跃，而三星的竞争对手现在已经赶上甚至超过了它。简而言之，Galaxy S10是可以买到的最好的智能手机之一，但它并没有像它的前辈那样从竞争中脱颖而出。

Samsung Galaxy S10 - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

94%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

98%

Connectivity

67 / 70 → 96%

Weight

92%

Battery

82%

Display

90%

Games Performance

50 / 64 → 77%

Application Performance

73 / 86 → 85%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

78%

Average

82%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-04-25 (Update: 2019-04-25)

三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Arena of Valor

Dead Trigger 2

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare