Notebookcheck

一加6T智能手机评测

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), 11/25/2018
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

第六元素。 一加刚刚发布了他们最新的旗舰级杀手,这与我们在8月份评测的上一代产品有所不同。值得注意的是,得益于更小的刘海,6T的屏幕变得更大,但它也去掉了耳机接口。6T延续了6的相机,价格也与6几乎相同,尽管基础型号价格有所上涨,但是这换来了存储大小的翻倍。我们的评测将告诉你一加6T是否有着和前代一样出色的性价比。

OnePlus 6T (6 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 630
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.41 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, 电容触摸屏, Optic AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: Audio output over USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint sensor, Gyroscope, Hall sensor, Proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, UMTS, LTE: Band – 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 157.5 x 74.8
Battery
14.06 Wh, 3700 mAh Lithium-Ion, OnePlus Fast Charge
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Main camera - Sony IMX 519, 20 MP, OIS, f/1.7, 1.22 μm pixel size. Secondary sensor: Sony IMX 376K, f/1.7, 1 μm pixel size
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Sony IMX 371, 16 MP, f/2.0, 1 μm pixel size
Additional features
Speakers: 1, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, Fast charger, USB Type-A to Type-C cable, USB Type-C to 3.5 mm jack adapter, Silicone case, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, LTE: Cat. 16 downloads - 1 GBit/s; Cat. 13 uploads – 150 MBit/s, fanless
Weight
185 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% +4%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% -1%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=303)
210 MBit/s ∼31% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼100% +36%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼95% +29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼93% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼80% +9%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=303)
205 MBit/s ∼32% -57%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø629 (621-638)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø466 (241-497)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Overview
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Overview
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Bridge
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with night mode disabled
Photos taken with night mode enabled
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
Photo taken at 1x zoom
Photo taken at 2x zoom
Photo taken with the OnePlus 6T
433
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 454 cd/m² Average: 441.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 437 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.21 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.307
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Screen
-6%
9%
-10%
28%
30%
Brightness middle
437
430
-2%
565
29%
477
9%
656
50%
569
30%
Brightness
442
437
-1%
571
29%
453
2%
659
49%
578
31%
Brightness Distribution
95
87
-8%
96
1%
86
-9%
88
-7%
95
0%
Black Level *
0.33
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.21
2.3
-4%
2.3
-4%
2.1
5%
1.7
23%
1.3
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.27
4.6
-8%
4.8
-12%
8.2
-92%
2.8
34%
2.1
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
2.4
-14%
1.9
10%
1.6
24%
1.7
19%
1.6
24%
Gamma
2.307 95%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.28 96%
1.998 110%
2.31 95%
CCT
6353 102%
6160 106%
6332 103%
6425 101%
6487 100%
6401 102%
Contrast
1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8943 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
13341 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -54%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼56% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)
13635 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼31% -66%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
8995 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼80% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼76% -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼60% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)
8655 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼38% -52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
2384 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼79% +58%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points ∼100% +100%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼40% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)
2417 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼27% -47%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
8487 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼63% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)
8018 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼54% -46%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
10590 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼55% -45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)
10123 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼47% -53%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
3681 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
3566 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2546 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2713 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
2942 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)
3110 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
5877 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
5547 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3792 Points ∼65% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5651 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
3109 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)
5494 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
5189 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
4937 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3420 Points ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4555 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro
3070 Points ∼59% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)
4646 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
3374 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6
3555 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2561 Points ∼72% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2721 Points ∼77% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points ∼83% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
2940 Points ∼83% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)
3081 Points ∼87% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼48% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
8397 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 6
8014 Points ∼77% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4797 Points ∼46% -43%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7609 Points ∼73% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
3503 Points ∼34% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)
7720 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
6310 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6
6267 Points ∼94% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4018 Points ∼60% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5438 Points ∼82% -14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei P20 Pro
3360 Points ∼50% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)
5771 Points ∼87% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
3537 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points ∼84% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)
3268 Points ∼90% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼45% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
5241 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼68% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)
4944 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
4734 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)
4424 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
3483 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)
3129 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
8272 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼40% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)
7818 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
6336 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)
5843 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
35022 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼93% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼71% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points ∼75% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)
33400 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼35% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
84998 Points ∼53%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼29% -45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points ∼100% +88%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼21% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)
80111 Points ∼50% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
64534 Points ∼83%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼80% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼51% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼39% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)
60990 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼19% -77%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
152 fps ∼67%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼66% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼65% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼66% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps ∼100% +49%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼54% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)
144 fps ∼64% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼14% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
60 fps ∼96%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)
62.7 fps ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼40% -58%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼55%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼62% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼69% +25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼66% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps ∼100% +81%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼57% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)
73 fps ∼68% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼16% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)
55 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% -73%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼85%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼81% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼68% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼84% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps ∼100% +17%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼56% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)
54.4 fps ∼78% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼21% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
53 fps ∼90%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼92% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼41% -55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼95% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps ∼100% +11%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼61% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)
46.5 fps ∼79% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼24% -74%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
22 fps ∼69%
OnePlus 6
23 fps ∼72% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
25 fps ∼78% +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps ∼100% +46%
Huawei P20 Pro
14 fps ∼44% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)
19.8 fps ∼62% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼32% -54%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
14 fps ∼86%
OnePlus 6
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps ∼100% +16%
Huawei P20 Pro
8.6 fps ∼53% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)
15.4 fps ∼94% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼40% -54%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
34 fps ∼72%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼74% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
40 fps ∼85% +18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps ∼100% +38%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼49% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)
28.5 fps ∼61% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼31% -58%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
37 fps ∼97%
OnePlus 6
38 fps ∼100% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
38 fps ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps ∼97% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼61% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)
35 fps ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼41% -58%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
35 fps ∼88%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼70% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps ∼100% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼58% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)
34 fps ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼25% -72%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
31 fps ∼84%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼38% -55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps ∼84% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼59% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)
28.3 fps ∼76% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼24% -71%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
35.34 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6
35.26 (min: 20.31, max: 62.64) fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
24.45 (min: 9.63, max: 65.63) fps ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (24.5 - 35.3, n=4)
31.4 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 651, n=36)
32.4 fps ∼92% -8%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
29.68 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6
26.15 (min: 15.32, max: 59.39) fps ∼88% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
10.52 (min: 5, max: 27.66) fps ∼35% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15.8 - 29.7, n=4)
22.3 fps ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 606, n=34)
28.8 fps ∼97% -3%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
32.86 fps ∼91%
OnePlus 6
28.35 (min: 16.41, max: 60.76) fps ∼79% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro
11.8 (min: 5.55, max: 28.23) fps ∼33% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21.3 - 32.9, n=4)
27.7 fps ∼77% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=32)
36.1 fps ∼100% +10%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
294488 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼88% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼83% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼81% -16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼69% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)
275958 Points ∼91% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼39% -60%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
228939 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼96% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼98% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)
223967 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=387)
75990 Points ∼33% -67%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
4716 Score ∼100%
OnePlus 6
4710 Score ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
1980 Score ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4598 - 4731, n=4)
4689 Score ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=39)
1773 Score ∼38% -62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
1398 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼64% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼81% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼74% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)
1348 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼40% -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
7969 Points ∼51%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼51% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼41% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points ∼100% +96%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼24% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)
7816 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
4344 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points ∼42% -58%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)
3594 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼29% -71%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
8156 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼70% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼55% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼72% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points ∼100% +43%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼51% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)
7657 Points ∼66% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼22% -69%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
4458 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼88% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼67% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼88% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼67% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)
4099 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼26% -72%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
1201 Points ∼50%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼49% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼62% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2407 Points ∼100% +100%
Huawei P20 Pro
887 Points ∼37% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5)
1179 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼29% -42%

Legend

 
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +217%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼32% +2%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)
76.9 Points ∼28% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼25% -19%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼21% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼13% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +156%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼39% +1%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)
15431 Points ∼36% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼34% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼27% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=557)
5556 Points ∼13% -67%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼100% -403%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼34% -69%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼28% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)
2874 ms * ∼25% -26%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼21% -7%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼18% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼5% +74%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
98 Points ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)
84.5 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points ∼48%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼41%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +33%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼73% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (260 - 291, n=21)
233 Points ∼67% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% -19%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼52% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼47% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼32% -57%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 6TOnePlus 6Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumHuawei P20 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
2%
-4%
161%
81%
-57%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.5 (51.3 - 72.4, n=5)
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=317)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80 (75.4 - 83.2, n=5)
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=317)
Random Write 4KB
22
21.8
-1%
22.74
3%
21.75
-1%
160.49
630%
92.1 (19.5 - 164, n=17)
319%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-27%
Random Read 4KB
138.5
137
-1%
129.68
-6%
135.99
-2%
144.33
4%
141 (132 - 158, n=17)
2%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.4
201.4
-1%
204.94
0%
170.98
-16%
196.69
-4%
202 (192 - 212, n=17)
-1%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB
735.3
725.6
-1%
818.69
11%
748.59
2%
831.82
13%
767 (675 - 853, n=17)
4%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-69%
Shadow Fight 3
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 9: Legends
 SettingsValue
 High Quality30 fps
 Standard / low30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 SettingsValue
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Load
 48.6 °C45.2 °C41.7 °C 
 46.8 °C44.5 °C42.3 °C 
 45.8 °C43.9 °C41.8 °C 
Maximum: 48.6 °C
Average: 44.5 °C
36 °C38.9 °C42 °C
36.1 °C39.4 °C38.9 °C
37.1 °C40.3 °C41.5 °C
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.3292538.131.33128.5284031.428.55036.634.26324.628.68024.126.510020.523.11251927.316016.939.920019.151.425016.652.431513.9554001559.550014.659.163012.357.480011.858.6100011.863.8125011.968.6160011.469.5200011.270250011.573.3315011.370.5400010.968.7500010.568.6630010.766800010.665.21000010.566.41250010.655.71600010.638.9SPL64.357.22480.5N16.810.40.545.3median 11.8median 59.5Delta2.28.422.924.324.224.125.12522.230.227.739.917.420.717.517.214.918.61419.514.732.112.243.413.649.513.153.910.857.29.754.29.357.19.6628.2668.168.1869.97.771.37.875.17.874.47.869.47.864.47.857.48.159.78.157.98.147.98.129.257.920.681.69.90.343.5median 8.1median 57.42.211hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 6TOnePlus 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 6T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 2.1 Watt
Load midlight 4.2 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
19%
-26%
-8%
15%
-19%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.6
14%
0.68
3%
0.67
4%
1
-43%
0.84
-20%
0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19)
-15%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=635)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.1
1
9%
0.95
14%
2.5
-127%
1.4
-27%
1.54
-40%
1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19)
-57%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=634)
-56%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
1.6
24%
1.09
48%
2.51
-20%
1.7
19%
1.57
25%
2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19)
-0%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=635)
5%
Load Average *
4.2
4.3
-2%
4.58
-9%
4.3
-2%
4.6
-10%
2.47
41%
4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19)
-14%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=629)
4%
Load Maximum *
8.3
8.6
-4%
5.16
38%
6.87
17%
6.7
19%
2.49
70%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19)
-11%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=629)
31%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 16min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 21min
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-26%
-30%
-18%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1936
1806
-7%
1343
-31%
1347
-30%
1305
-33%
1727
-11%
H.264
903
791
-12%
674
-25%
520
-42%
801
-11%
784
-13%
WiFi v1.3
865
762
-12%
521
-40%
547
-37%
742
-14%
744
-14%
Load
261
246
-6%
237
-9%
235
-10%
223
-15%
345
32%

Pros

+ 强劲的性能
+ 足够大的存储空间
+ GPS精确度可圈可点
+ 最新且流畅的软件
+ 60帧的游戏体验
+ 不错的续航
+ 坚固的机身

Cons

- 没有耳机接口
- Wi-Fi速度慢(目前)
- 屏下指纹并不可靠
- 无SD卡槽
- 外放一般
- 无防尘防水

总结

The OnePlus 6T review. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany.
The OnePlus 6T review. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

没错,一加6T是一款真正的旗舰级杀手,它既有着一切你需要的配置,又具有超强的续航。起售价的确高于前代,但这换来了存储大小的翻倍。不幸的是,与一加6的后置指纹相比,6T的屏下指纹识别速度较慢而且准确度低。

我们之前解释过了6T最重要的一些功能,但是还有许多关于这台手机的信息未被透露。例如,6T保留了流畅的操作系统,内置了暗色主题和与前代相同的简约UI设计。同时,得益于更大的电池,续航变得更加出色,而快充则与前代同样优秀。

“一加6T是一款优雅且可靠的旗舰手机,它有着卓越的性能和领先同级的续航。然而,反应迟钝的屏下指纹和耳机接口的缺失让我们觉得6T并不比它的前代更值得购买。”

对于一加6用户来说,升级到6T并不值得,特别是6T的新功能没有比6更加便利。我们估计屏下指纹技术会在未来的8-12个月内成熟很多,但就现在来看,屏下指纹所提供的便利并不能遮盖住它的缺点。6T的大部分硬件与6相同,所以你应该只能感受到软件上的不同,更有可能这种所谓的不同只是一剂安慰剂。

更小的刘海也不能成为你的换机理由,特别是考虑到6T移除了耳机接口。简而言之,6T是一款出色的旗舰智能手机,它的存在使得其他更加昂贵的手机有些尴尬。但是,如果你已经拥有了一加6,升级的意义并不大。

 

 

OnePlus 6T - 11/08/2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 60 → 78%
Weight
89%
Battery
97%
Display
90%
Games Performance
54 / 63 → 85%
Application Performance
78 / 70 → 100%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Camera
88%
Average
82%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 一加6T智能手机评测
Florian Schmitt, 2018-11-25 (Update: 2018-11-25)