Notebookcheck

一加7 Pro智能手机评测

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), 07/21/2019
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen OnePlus

至尊享受。 一加7 Pro是该公司的新旗舰产品。该设备具有巨大的非异形屏,三个后置摄像头等等。 请继续阅读,了解这款所谓的旗舰杀手是否能达到预期效果。

OnePlus 7 Pro (7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.67 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, 10点触控, AMOLED, 90 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 239 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 通过USB Type-C输出音频, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,指南针,陀螺仪,激光传感器,接近传感器,传感器集线器
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: Bands 2, 3, 5, 8. UMTS: Bands, 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 19. LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 66., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 162.6 x 75.9
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 30瓦快充
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 万索尼IMX586,1.6μm,f / 1.6,OIS(摄像头1),800万远摄,1μm,OIS,f / 2.4(摄像头2),1600万超广角,f / 2.2( 相机3),三重自动对焦:PDAF,激光,对比度; 4K / 60 FPS的视频
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix 索尼IMX471,1μm,f / 2.0,定焦,EIS,可伸缩
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器,USB线,SIM工具,硅胶外壳, 24 Months Warranty, LTE速度:Cat.18下载(1.2 Gbps),Cat.13上传(150 Mbps, fanless
Weight
206 g, Power Supply: 126 g
Price
829 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro

Size Comparison

162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g158.01 mm 73.37 mm 8.41 mm 192 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97% +42%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 619, max: 639) MBit/s ∼93% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼93% +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% +34%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=417)
223 MBit/s ∼33% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼90% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 (min: 439, max: 508) MBit/s ∼73% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=417)
213 MBit/s ∼32% -55%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Overview
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Overview
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Loop
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Loop
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Bridge
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Photographed with the telephoto lens
Photographed with the telephoto lens
Photographed with the regular sensor
Photographed with the regular sensor
Photographed with the ultra-wide sensor
Photographed with the ultra-wide sensor
Photographed using night mode
Photographed using night mode
Photographed with the regular sensor
Photographed with the regular sensor
584
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 597 cd/m² Average: 584.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 586 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.39 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-66%
-3%
11%
-189%
-16%
Brightness middle
586
710
21%
656
12%
593
1%
435
-26%
597
2%
Brightness
584
721
23%
659
13%
587
1%
442
-24%
608
4%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
88
-9%
94
-3%
95
-2%
89
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.39
3.7
-166%
1.7
-22%
0.9
35%
6.79
-388%
2.2
-58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.7
10.3
-281%
2.8
-4%
2
26%
14.93
-453%
3.6
-33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
1.7
-6%
1.5
6%
5.4
-238%
1.6
-0%
Gamma
2.243 98%
2.1 105%
1.998 110%
2.27 97%
2.252 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6672 97%
6611 98%
6487 100%
6548 99%
7588 86%
6268 104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 122 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 122 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 122 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9457 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼77% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼56% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
13260 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points ∼65% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=10)
7597 Points ∼57% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=316)
4562 Points ∼34% -39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼98% +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8906 Points ∼79% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points ∼88% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=12)
10936 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=374)
4587 Points ∼41% -58%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼94% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼74% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
2420 Points ∼51% -30%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points ∼69% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=12)
3482 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=376)
1369 Points ∼29% -61%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8689 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=11)
9555 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=370)
5030 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼75% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼85% -7%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
10984 Points ∼85% -7%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=11)
12008 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=538)
5516 Points ∼42% -53%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2488 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3183 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=11)
2979 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2105 - 15735, n=53)
2380 Points ∼72% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5530 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4688 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5862, n=11)
5548 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=53)
2394 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4348 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4242 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=11)
4640 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=56)
2077 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼66% -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3717 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=11)
3733 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=383)
1833 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5869 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=11)
6745 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=383)
1606 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5200 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=11)
5675 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=386)
1492 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3439 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=10)
3878 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=398)
1810 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43% -57%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8415 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=10)
9416 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=398)
2191 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼51% -49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
6368 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=10)
7099 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=399)
1863 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3496 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4320, n=11)
3756 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=459)
1768 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼59% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5246 Points ∼83% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points ∼69% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=11)
6235 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=461)
1333 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼80% -20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4721 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5734, n=11)
5418 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=469)
1271 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3551 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3505 - 4454, n=10)
3910 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=492)
1677 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼71% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8248 Points ∼83% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=10)
9125 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=492)
1806 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼60% -40%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
6374 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=10)
7026 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=500)
1550 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼92% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼79% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼72% -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
35217 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points ∼89% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23877 - 45072, n=10)
31426 Points ∼89% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=651)
13704 Points ∼39% -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼44% -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼67% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
84459 Points ∼53% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points ∼40% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (103955 - 110432, n=10)
95143 Points ∼60% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=651)
20176 Points ∼13% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼80% -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
64437 Points ∼83% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points ∼67% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (63969 - 83518, n=10)
61470 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=652)
16708 Points ∼22% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼42% -42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼74% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
151 fps ∼67% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps ∼61% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=12)
160 fps ∼71% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=680)
35.2 fps ∼16% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼92% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼95% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼95% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
60 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼95% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=12)
63.3 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=683)
27.1 fps ∼43% -55%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼63% -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼93% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
79 fps ∼74% -22%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps ∼85% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=12)
95 fps ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=599)
19.5 fps ∼18% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼98% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼99% +9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
59 fps ∼98% +7%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=12)
60.5 fps ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=604)
17.9 fps ∼30% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
56 fps ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=12)
62.5 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=460)
16 fps ∼23% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
50 fps ∼85% +39%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼80% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=12)
49.2 fps ∼84% +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=463)
15.3 fps ∼26% -57%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50% +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼75% +60%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
21 fps ∼65% +40%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼62% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=11)
21.5 fps ∼67% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=163)
8.9 fps ∼28% -41%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼96% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼94% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
14 fps ∼82% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=12)
16.9 fps ∼99% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=163)
6.19 fps ∼36% -61%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼79% +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
34 fps ∼72% +48%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼68% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=11)
34.2 fps ∼73% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=164)
13.5 fps ∼29% -41%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼80% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼89% -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
37 fps ∼80% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps ∼78% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=12)
40.3 fps ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=164)
14.8 fps ∼32% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
34 fps ∼79% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps ∼77% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=12)
39.8 fps ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=389)
10.7 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼82% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +81%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
31 fps ∼82% +48%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps ∼71% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=12)
32.9 fps ∼87% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=393)
9.7 fps ∼26% -54%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
37.3 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27.02 (min: 2.8, max: 80.83) fps ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)
35.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼40% -60%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
22.73 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼84% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +42%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28.46 (min: 9.24, max: 54.37) fps ∼88% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼85% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼38% -47%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36.29 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼93% -2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
30.67 (min: 5.93, max: 132.19) fps ∼80% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)
32.2 fps ∼84% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼37% -61%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼89% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
293768 Points ∼78% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
316199 Points ∼84% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=12)
353615 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=282)
131480 Points ∼35% -64%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Score ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼99% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5020 Score ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4486 - 4969, n=3)
4806 Score ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼38% -62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼80% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
1395 Points ∼81% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1409 Points ∼81% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1431, n=11)
1321 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=613)
744 Points ∼43% -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼54% -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼59% -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
7926 Points ∼51% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7758 Points ∼50% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=11)
9109 Points ∼58% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=613)
1960 Points ∼13% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3907 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5210 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=11)
4976 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=613)
1465 Points ∼28% -72%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼71% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼72% -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8138 Points ∼70% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8572 Points ∼73% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=11)
8480 Points ∼73% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=613)
2881 Points ∼25% -68%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼91% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4330 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4701 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=11)
4716 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=617)
1432 Points ∼29% -71%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1425 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼80% +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼59% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1627 Points ∼68% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1075 - 1425, n=4)
1334 Points ∼55% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=103)
703 Points ∼29% -51%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.469 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=10)
57.1 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=89)
30.7 Points ∼49% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% +7%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=9)
60.6 runs/min ∼89% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼83% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=80)
34.5 runs/min ∼51% -44%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +40%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points ∼79% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼74% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼70% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=12)
106 Points ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=143)
63.3 Points ∼41% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +74%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼57% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=12)
22912 Points ∼53% -7%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points ∼52% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼48% -16%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)
16902 Points ∼39% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=673)
6334 Points ∼15% -74%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=693)
10747 ms * ∼100% -447%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)
2348 ms * ∼22% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=11)
2141 ms * ∼20% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009.1 ms * ∼19% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +69%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 7 ProSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusXiaomi Mi 9OnePlus 6T McLaren EditionHuawei P30 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
125%
-28%
116%
3%
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.19 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=406)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.6 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=406)
Random Write 4KB
24.8
22.7
-8%
165.32
567%
22.3
-10%
159.22
542%
26.8 (24.8 - 28.7, n=2)
8%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
174.1
135.16
-22%
149.36
-14%
145.1
-17%
174.36
0%
175 (174 - 175, n=2)
1%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
387
249.06
-36%
388.27
0%
253.3
-35%
250.82
-35%
390 (387 - 392, n=2)
1%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722)
-76%
Sequential Read 256KB
1468
811.17
-45%
666.06
-55%
733.1
-50%
849.48
-42%
1466 (1463 - 1468, n=2)
0%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722)
-82%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (58-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (59-61)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (57-61)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (52-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø29.6 (27-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø30 (29-31)
Max. Load
 47 °C45.2 °C40.6 °C 
 46 °C44.7 °C41.4 °C 
 45.2 °C43.8 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 43.8 °C
35.4 °C38.9 °C42.9 °C
36.6 °C39.5 °C42.1 °C
37.4 °C40 °C40.9 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 39.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.650.12544.645.13140.239.74037.739.95038.440.86331.933.88028.73010029.137.41252839.616026.349.920025.858.625024.463.73152465.840023.864.450022.568.963022.569.480021.773.5100021.881.8125021.179.8160022.381.3200022.180.2250021.181.4315020.980.7400020.680.6500020.878.9630020.770.6800020.967.7100002168.11250020.969.7160002163.8SPL75.633.790.9N34.92.183.1median 21.8median 69.4Delta29.94028.833.542.139.542.135.133.331.630.824.625.527.128.1262619.828.118.542.618.853.817.355.716.258.815.260.915.260.414.460.315.263.614.466.613.968.713.77213.672.313.573.113.472.313.471.113.469.913.36813.467.113.466.813.556.513.539.462.626.281.915.60.850.5median 13.9median 63.61.58hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 7 ProOnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.8 / 2.9 Watt
Load midlight 5.5 / 8.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
3700 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
17%
26%
20%
7%
12%
18%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.73
19%
1
-11%
0.67
26%
0.6
33%
0.68
24%
0.897 (0.6 - 1.3, n=11)
-0%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=749)
2%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.53
15%
1.4
22%
1.26
30%
1.3
28%
2.6
-44%
1.505 (1 - 2.35, n=11)
16%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=748)
4%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2.07
29%
1.7
41%
1.29
56%
2.1
28%
2.77
4%
1.875 (1.13 - 2.9, n=11)
35%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=749)
30%
Load Average *
5.5
6.03
-10%
4.6
16%
3.71
33%
4.5
18%
3.74
32%
4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=11)
16%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=743)
26%
Load Maximum *
8.2
9.18
-12%
6.7
18%
9.3
-13%
8.6
-5%
6.82
17%
8.87 (7.49 - 10.2, n=11)
-8%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=743)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 56min
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
3700 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-9%
-7%
18%
29%
Reader / Idle
1745
1560
-11%
1305
-25%
1650
-5%
1966
13%
H.264
802
921
15%
801
0%
1008
26%
1193
49%
WiFi v1.3
768
483
-37%
742
-3%
546
-29%
905
18%
838
9%
Load
236
187
-21%
223
-6%
194
-18%
344
46%

Pros

+ 非异形屏
+ 优质设计
+ 丰富的LTE覆盖范围
+ 3倍光学变焦
+ 快速内部存储
+ 续航时间长
+ 超快速充电

Cons

- 曲面屏容易误触
- 没有耳机插孔
- 太重
- 没有IP认证
- 没有无线充电
- Wi-Fi速度较慢
一加7 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany.
一加7 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

OnePlus 7 Pro是国产旗舰智能手机的一次令人印象深刻的尝试。该设备具有快速存储,良好的续航时间,快速充电,优质的设计,改进的指纹识别和非异形屏。哦,它也有90 Hz的刷新率,别忘了还有电动弹出式前置摄像头,这肯定会很有回头率。立体声扬声器给我们留下了深刻的印象,它们的声音浓郁而温暖。

7 Pro可能是迄今为止最昂贵的一加设备,但无论您购买哪个版本,价格仍然低于其他旗舰机。它的充电时间短,屏幕与机身比高,90 Hz显示,在某些地方的表现优于其他旗舰。

我们确实有一些要批评的地方。曲面屏的确很好看,但实用性不强,这也导致了机身的厚重。此外,7 Pro运行时温度较高,以至于某些人在长时间的游戏过程中难以握住设备。我们希望一加能够对其设备进行IP认证,并添加无线充电,因为与其他旗舰相比,这些都是7 Pro明显的短板。其他设备也提供更快的Wi-Fi,而一加对于移除耳机插孔的选择仍然看起来没有任何理由。

OnePlus 7 Pro是一款令人印象深刻的旗舰产品,功能繁多,使其与同时代的产品脱颖而出。

热管有助于防止SoC性能受到限制,并没有让855比在小米Mi 9中表现得更好。后置三摄通常也会拍摄出色的照片,不过默认的夜视模式并不出色。无论如何,自动模式仍然可以在光线不足的情况下拍摄好照片,所以这并非全是坏消息。

简而言之,7 Pro有一些弱点,但没有一个是致命的。以前的一加智能手机并没有像华为和三星设备那样在发布后几个月就降价。因此,与Galaxy S10+或P30 Pro相比,7 Pro可能会在今年年底时显得没那么有性价比。这只是一些值得记住的事情,并不应该阻止你选择7 Pro,这是一款出色的旗舰智能手机。

OnePlus 7 Pro - 06/14/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
45 / 60 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
95%
Display
93%
Games Performance
72 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
85 / 70 → 100%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
83%
Average
82%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 一加7 Pro智能手机评测
Florian Schmitt, 2019-07-21 (Update: 2019-07-21)