Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A03 智能手机评测--价格低廉的Galaxy ,具有快速的无线网络。

下一代的廉价。 前代产品有点落后于它的时代,但三星通过Galaxy A03在低价手机领域明显赶上了。快速的Wi-Fi和新的摄像头是否足以真正撼动竞争者?
Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy A03
Samsung Galaxy A03 (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, 2.5D curved, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 166.6 x 75.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 7.8 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.790W/​kg (head), 0.840W/​kg (body), fanless
Weight
196 g
Price
160 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
74.6 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A03
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
196 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
73.6 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
196 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75.1 %
05/2022
Motorola Moto G22
Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
77 %
04/2022
Nokia G11
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
190 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

外壳和设备 - 更多的内存和快速的microSD读取器

三星有几款入门级手机,而Galaxy A03是目前最便宜的手机之一。因此,韩国人只能以不到160欧元的价格提供一个相当简单的塑料外壳,这并不令人惊讶。相较于 Galaxy A03s相比,它提供了一个相当别致的交叉线图案。外壳的稳定性也给人以高质量的感觉,所以智能手机几乎不能被扭曲。然而,正面的压力会很快传到屏幕上。

与去年相比,在重量和尺寸方面没有任何变化。

Galaxy A03比它的前辈提供了更多的存储空间:它有64GB的大容量存储和4GB的内存,但它在欧洲并没有变得更加昂贵。同样,有NFC,在这个价格范围内不一定是理所当然的事。然而,在USB端口方面有一个退步,似乎有点令人费解:现在又安装了一个微型USB端口,而不是USB-C端口,其插头不能从各个方向插入。现在是时候让制造商在廉价手机中也最终埋葬这个过时的USB端口了。

微型SD读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽分开。它在复制测试和CPDT基准测试中都取得了非常好的速率,因此microSD卡可以很好地用于内存扩展。

三星Galaxy A03
三星Galaxy A03
三星Galaxy A03
三星Galaxy A03
三星Galaxy A03

尺寸比较

166.6 mm 75.9 mm 9.2 mm 196 g166.5 mm 75.9 mm 9.2 mm 196 g164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g164 mm 75 mm 8.5 mm 185 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A03
  (Angelbird V60)
54.5 MB/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  (Angelbird V60)
50 MB/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=85, last 2 years)
26.5 MB/s ∼49% -51%
Nokia G11
  (Angelbird V60)
25.3 MB/s ∼46% -54%
Motorola Moto G22
  (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s ∼45% -55%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A03 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø29.5 (11.9-42)
Samsung Galaxy A03s PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.4 (18.7-39.4)
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.9 (20.7-46.1)
Nokia G11 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28 (9.9-43.7)
Samsung Galaxy A03 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø74.5 (32.2-81.8)
Samsung Galaxy A03s PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø55.2 (10.2-58.9)
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (27.9-75.8)
Nokia G11 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (34.1-83.1)

通信、软件和操作 - 最后的WiFi 5

如果 Galaxy A03s只配备了WiFi 4,后续产品终于有了WiFi 5,现在即使在廉价的入门级产品中也很常见。Galaxy A03表现良好,但在传输速率上有两个轻微的下降。

LTE频率仍然不多,所以国外的移动互联网成为一场赌博。在我们的测试中,接收情况总体上是不错的,但Galaxy A03确实在个别时候出现了信号不足的情况。

Android 11与三星OneUI 3.1被预装在智能手机上。在我们的测试中,我们收到了5月份的最新安全补丁的更新。根据三星的说法, 12仍将到来,但在今年下半年之前不应指望它。此外, 13可能将在明年为这款手机发布。Android Android

60赫兹的触摸屏可以快速操作。指纹传感器是完全没有的。解锁只能通过面部识别,但这只是一个有点不安全的软件解决方案,不能用于直接解锁网上银行等应用程序。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A03s
802.11 b/g/n
52.5 (42min - 65max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A03s
802.11 b/g/n
55.5 (50min - 63max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto G22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
370 (351min - 376max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A03
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (220min - 355max) MBit/s ∼86%
Nokia G11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
311 (219min - 345max) MBit/s ∼84% -2%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Moto G22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
326 (305min - 332max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A03
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
311 (297min - 319max) MBit/s ∼95%
Nokia G11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
298 (283min - 313max) MBit/s ∼91% -4%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (297-319)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (220-355)

照相机 - 不再有微距相机

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

Galaxy A03的摄像系统与A03的摄像系统相比,是前进了一步还是退步了一步? Galaxy A03s?这是一个有趣的问题,乍一看很难回答:一方面,相机的分辨率大大提高,达到4800万像素,但另一方面,它通常只使用四分之一的分辨率,但由于像素较大,感光度更高。此外,Galaxy A03不再有一个专门的微距相机。

让我们仔细看看图像质量:在直接比较中,两款智能手机的照片看起来非常相似。Galaxy A03再次提供了体面的动态效果,即使在更困难的情况下,但细节很快就会模糊不清。额外的感光性在照片中几乎看不出来。与高端手机相机相比,明显较低的图像清晰度和像素化区域是明显的。

视频仍然可以以最高1080p和30帧的速度录制。自动对焦和曝光补偿的速度令人满意,但图像清晰度在低光下迅速下降,视频开始出现噪音。总的来说,这两代智能手机在摄影方面处于差不多的水平。

用500万像素的前置摄像头拍摄的照片相当不错,但动态范围可以更高,你不应该把照片放大太多,因为细节会丢失。不过,自拍是可以用于社交媒体的。


Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
20 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
20 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A03: 13.64 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.52 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
38 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
38 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
62 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
69.4 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
66.4 ∆E
66.4 ∆E
50 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A03: 43.6 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 69.39 ∆E

显示屏 - 更加明亮,但有蓝色偏光

子像素结构
子像素结构

Galaxy A03的屏幕具有扩大的720p分辨率,因此在手机的价格范围内属于标准水平。

显示屏比前代产品更亮一些,但平均亮度为419cd/m²,仍然落后于Moto G22的屏幕。 摩托G22诺基亚G11后面。我们喜欢低黑值,这实际上使黑暗区域显得相当深,也实现了良好的对比度。

与对比领域中的所有手机一样,色彩再现相当不准确。灰度中也有严重的偏蓝。另一方面,我们没有注意到任何PWM,所以即使是那些对闪烁敏感的人也可以毫无问题地使用这款手机的屏幕。

424
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 419.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 443 cd/m²
Contrast: 1641:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.99 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.174
Samsung Galaxy A03
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A03s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Motorola Moto G22
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia G11
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
4%
8%
6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58 ?(27, 31)
54 ?(27, 27)
7%
46 ?(25, 21)
21%
48 ?(27, 21)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
32 ?(19, 13)
32 ?(17, 15)
-0%
34 ?(19, 15)
-6%
34 ?(19, 15)
-6%
PWM Frequency
807 ?(10)
Screen
-12%
-15%
-16%
Brightness middle
443
383
-14%
451
2%
502
13%
Brightness
419
354
-16%
431
3%
486
16%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
90
0%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.34
-26%
0.5
-85%
0.53
-96%
Contrast
1641
1126
-31%
902
-45%
947
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.99
5.09
-2%
5.82
-17%
5.73
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.01
9.25
-3%
9.3
-3%
8.72
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.4
6.5
-2%
5
22%
6.8
-6%
Gamma
2.174 101%
2.261 97%
2.776 79%
2.352 94%
CCT
8495 77%
8152 80%
7683 85%
8800 74%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -9%
-4% / -11%
-5% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21751 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 更大的功率,更多的运行时间

使用 统一的T606作为SoC,三星为Galaxy A03做出了一个坚实的选择,这意味着与A03s相比有明显的性能优势。 Galaxy A03s.这款智能手机在日常使用中更加灵活,在一个有点复杂的背景应用程序中不会立即下降到膝盖上。照片有时在网站上加载得相当快,所以用Galaxy A03浏览也会相当不错。

要求高的游戏玩家将不得不另寻他处,但那些只想玩愤怒的小鸟或糖果粉碎机等较简单游戏的人将获得足够的性能。

eMMC存储在这个价格范围内也很常见,但与更高端的智能手机相比,它的速度仍然很烦人,而且明显延长了加载时间和数据传输。

长时间的高负荷导致明显的发热,但它仍然在可接受的范围内。

底部边缘的单声道扬声器是非常重的高音,不能真正在较长时间内提供良好的音乐质量。机上有一个3.5毫米音频插孔和蓝牙5.0,可以通过它们轻松连接外部音频设备。然而,最新的aptX编解码器不能用于蓝牙。

5,000毫安时的电池足以保证良好的运行时间,但比前代产品的运行时间短很多。然而,18:17小时的无线网络冲浪,你也应该在手机的中等负荷下度过两个工作日。充电的最大功率为7.8瓦,所以当手机没电时,你不应该着急:充满电可能需要3小时。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
303 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
172 Points ∼25% -43%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
172 Points ∼25% -43%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
311 Points ∼46% +3%
Average UNISOC T606
  (273 - 313, n=5)
302 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=258, last 2 years)
681 Points ∼100% +125%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1151 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼40% -23%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
947 Points ∼43% -18%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
1113 Points ∼50% -3%
Average UNISOC T606
  (708 - 1185, n=5)
1066 Points ∼48% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=258, last 2 years)
2225 Points ∼100% +93%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6721 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5059 Points ∼49% -25%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4922 Points ∼48% -27%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
7912 Points ∼77% +18%
Average UNISOC T606
  (6721 - 7912, n=4)
7398 Points ∼72% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=152, last 2 years)
10221 Points ∼100% +52%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
954 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
457 Points ∼18% -52%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
453 Points ∼18% -53%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
962 Points ∼38% +1%
Average UNISOC T606
  (945 - 963, n=4)
956 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=180, last 2 years)
2534 Points ∼100% +166%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
813 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
387 Points ∼15% -52%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
383 Points ∼15% -53%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
817 Points ∼31% 0%
Average UNISOC T606
  (806 - 823, n=4)
815 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=179, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼100% +224%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2438 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1238 Points ∼43% -49%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1265 Points ∼44% -48%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
2535 Points ∼89% +4%
Average UNISOC T606
  (2379 - 2535, n=4)
2435 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=179, last 2 years)
2861 Points ∼100% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
962 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
522 Points ∼13% -46%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
536 Points ∼13% -44%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
969 Points ∼23% +1%
Average UNISOC T606
  (959 - 969, n=4)
965 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=235, last 2 years)
4157 Points ∼100% +332%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
818 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
447 Points ∼8% -45%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
460 Points ∼9% -44%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
820 Points ∼16% 0%
Average UNISOC T606
  (814 - 825, n=4)
819 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=235, last 2 years)
5276 Points ∼100% +545%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2515 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1259 Points ∼39% -50%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1283 Points ∼39% -49%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
2667 Points ∼82% +6%
Average UNISOC T606
  (2484 - 2667, n=4)
2556 Points ∼78% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=235, last 2 years)
3268 Points ∼100% +30%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
402 Points ∼13%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
394 Points ∼12% -2%
Average UNISOC T606
  (394 - 402, n=3)
398 Points ∼12% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=186, last 2 years)
3203 Points ∼100% +697%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
406 Points ∼12%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
392 Points ∼11% -3%
Average UNISOC T606
  (392 - 406, n=3)
397 Points ∼11% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=190, last 2 years)
3513 Points ∼100% +765%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
114 Points ∼11%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
112 Points ∼11% -2%
Average UNISOC T606
  (111 - 114, n=3)
112.3 Points ∼11% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=145, last 2 years)
1026 Points ∼100% +800%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
109 Points ∼11%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
109 Points ∼11% 0%
Average UNISOC T606
  (109 - 110, n=3)
109.3 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=141, last 2 years)
1012 Points ∼100% +828%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
9.9 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
7.5 fps ∼26% -24%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7 fps ∼24% -29%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
9.6 fps ∼33% -3%
Average UNISOC T606
  (9.5 - 9.9, n=4)
9.65 fps ∼33% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 104, n=254, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼100% +197%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1.9 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼12% +116%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4 fps ∼11% +111%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
5.3 fps ∼15% +179%
Average UNISOC T606
  (1.9 - 5.3, n=4)
4.4 fps ∼13% +132%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=255, last 2 years)
35.1 fps ∼100% +1747%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼23% -24%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5 fps ∼25% -19%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
6 fps ∼29% -3%
Average UNISOC T606
  (6 - 6.2, n=4)
6.08 fps ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=255, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼100% +229%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
0.85 fps ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.5 fps ∼11% +76%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼11% +76%
Nokia G11
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
1.9 fps ∼14% +124%
Average UNISOC T606
  (0.85 - 2, n=4)
1.663 fps ∼12% +96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=255, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼100% +1476%
Samsung Galaxy A03Samsung Galaxy A03sMotorola Moto G22Nokia G11Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-42%
-7%
-15%
190%
Sequential Read 256KB
250
279.8
12%
215.45
-14%
252.7
1%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=188)
9%
942 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=249, last 2 years)
277%
Sequential Write 256KB
188.3
86.8
-54%
112.78
-40%
187.6
0%
176.7 ?(40 - 274, n=188)
-6%
482 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=249, last 2 years)
156%
Random Read 4KB
70.5
64
-9%
39.32
-44%
48.2
-32%
58.9 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=188)
-16%
168.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=249, last 2 years)
139%
Random Write 4KB
56.5
48.7
-14%
16.34
-71%
59
4%
30.8 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=188)
-45%
162.3 ?(56.5 - 458, n=250, last 2 years)
187%

温度

Max. Load
 41 °C35 °C31.7 °C 
 41.3 °C34.9 °C31.9 °C 
 41 °C35.6 °C31.9 °C 
Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 36 °C
33.6 °C34.3 °C37.7 °C
33 °C34.7 °C41.4 °C
31.7 °C35 °C41.9 °C
Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.240.62533.935.63127304032.431.7503632.76330.928.98019.419.610019.919.912515.513.916015.914.920012.323.225012.93331512.940.44009.946.150010.251.563013.457.18001763.2100014.269.3125012.871.6160011.774.9200010.273250011.668.231501366.440001570.150001671630014.666.5800015.262.91000015.970.41250016.364.61600016.654.6SPL26.281.9N0.746.9median 14.2median 63.2Delta1.915.341.543.635.540.431.731.230.834.632.235.825.128.619.424.120.928.217.632.615.837.91338.211.738.610.646.710.550.611.957.313.868.615.474.612.774.11674.612.470.111.666.113.16613.168.713.77114.271.714.772.415.364.915.964.716.557.917.146.726.182.60.752.7median 13.8median 64.91.812.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A03Nokia G11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A03 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Nokia G11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Samsung Galaxy A03
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A03s
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G22
5000 mAh
Nokia G11
5050 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
1097
1193
9%
1101
0%
1053
-4%
907 ?(438 - 1953, n=256, last 2 years)
-17%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
18h 17min

Pros

+ 不错的系统性能
+ 运行时间长
+ 快速、专用的microSD插槽
+ 无PWM的显示屏

Cons

- 微型USB接口
- 没有指纹识别器
- 充电速度慢
- 部分无线信号较弱

结论--老问题过去了,新问题来了

在审查中。三星Galaxy A03
在审查中。三星Galaxy A03

三星通过Galaxy A03向正确的方向迈出了一步,并再次接近了竞争对手。尽管Galaxy A03绝不是性价比的赢家,但它是一款可靠的入门级手机,终于也提供了更快的网络、更多的内存和合理的性能率。

电池运行时间也仍然令人信服,但前代的 Galaxy A03s仍然有鼻子有眼。你还得到了一个快速的microSD读卡器,一个在这个价格范围内还算不错的主摄像头,以及一个相当明亮的无PWM显示屏。

长的运行时间和良好的系统性能使Galaxy A03成为一款体面的入门级手机。然而,在购买之前,你应该考虑这款智能手机的问题所在。

我们对重新引入的microUSB端口、充电速度慢、可用的LTE频率少以及缺少指纹传感器感到恼火。总而言之,这款价格低廉的Galaxy 手机提供了一些好的和坏的特征,所以你应该在购买前仔细检查你是否能接受这些缺点。

更具说服力的是 诺基亚G11:它可以通过指纹解锁,甚至提供90赫兹的屏幕,但我们不喜欢它的相机。廉价的小米红米手机也是一个很好的选择;其中一些手机提供更多的功能。

价格和可用性

在测试时,三星Galaxy A03在网上的售价约为137欧元。另外。amazon.comnotebooksbilliger.de也有该设备的报价。

Samsung Galaxy A03 - 06/03/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
78%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
39 / 70 → 55%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
83%
Games Performance
12 / 64 → 18%
Application Performance
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 90 → 60%
Camera
46%
Average
68%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A03 智能手机评测--价格低廉的Galaxy ,具有快速的无线网络。
Florian Schmitt, 2022-06- 6 (Update: 2022-06- 6)