Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar诺基亚G11 Plus评测--廉价4G手机中的好相机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.2 % | 07/2023 | Nokia G11 Plus T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 192 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
| 77 % | 04/2022 | Nokia G11 T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 190 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 79 % | 04/2023 | Motorola Moto G13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 183.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.9 % | 07/2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 201 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
外壳和设备 - 坚固的塑料
与 诺基亚G11与诺基亚G11一样，该机采用了质量上乘、设计精美的塑料外壳，带有轻微的波纹图案和简洁的材质过渡。这款手机比前代产品重2克，体积略大，但屏幕也略大。
IP52认证是该机的一项新功能，它至少保证了对粗糙污垢和溅水的防护。这款手机的结构非常稳定，但在受压或扭动时会发出轻微的吱吱声。有灰色和蓝色两种颜色可供选择。
诺基亚G11 Plus可选配3GB内存和32GB大容量存储空间或4GB内存和64GB大容量存储空间。在中欧地区，目前几乎只能买到存储空间较小的版本，价格约为150欧元。
遗憾的是，该机没有用于非接触式支付的NFC功能，但除了两个SIM卡插槽外，还有一个microSD插槽。在我们使用参考microSD卡Angelbird V60进行的测试中，读卡器的传输速率处于较低水平。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia G11 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Nokia G11 Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 诺基亚手机中稳定的无线局域网
目前最快的无线局域网标准是WiFi 5，诺基亚G11 Plus的传输速率通常在300-350 MBit/s左右。在我们使用华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000路由器进行的测试中，传输速率非常稳定。
G11 Plus仍然不支持5G，但这对于这样一款廉价手机来说并不罕见。4G频率也不多，所以当您进一步旅行时，应该检查手机是否可以连接到目的地国家的网络。在我们的测试中，诺基亚G11 Plus在短时间的移动信号测试中被证明是相当可靠的，尽管它没有达到高端手机的接收强度。
诺基亚承诺为G11 Plus提供两次主要的操作系统更新和三年的安全补丁，这一点非常好。不过，Android 13的更新已经发布，因此之后可能只会提供Android 14。一如既往，诺基亚的Android ，但你不得不忍受一些广告应用程序。得益于Widevine L1，流媒体内容也可以高清观看。
同样，90 Hz的屏幕使操作更加流畅，尽管缓慢的SoC有时会产生卡顿。与诺基亚G11相比，指纹传感器移到了背面。 诺基亚G11与诺基亚G11相比，该机的指纹传感器被移至机身背面，但仍能完美工作，只是解锁时需要短暂等待。面部识别仅基于2D图像，因此很容易受到操纵，正如我们已经报道的那样。 已经报道过.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 | |
摄像头 - 大幅升级
诺基亚G11 Plus配备了5000万像素的新主摄像头，但作为回报，诺基亚G11仍配备的200万像素微距镜头被取消。这并不是一个很大的损失，因为它的分辨率太低，几乎不能有意义地使用。剩下的200万像素摄像头本应为人像照片提供深度信息，但也几乎没有增加任何价值。实际上，诺基亚G11 Plus只有一个摄像头可用于拍照。
该摄像头可拍摄5,000万像素的照片，但只能在特殊模式下拍摄；默认情况下使用1/4的分辨率，并为此创建更大的像素。虽然拍摄植物的照片看起来还不错，细节清晰度和动态效果对于这样一款廉价手机来说还算合格，但拍摄周围环境的照片时却出现了奇怪的黄色雾气。不过，对于这样一款廉价手机而言，细节显示仍然不错。在弱光环境下，清晰度明显下降，在暗处几乎无法辨认出任何东西。
视频最高可录制1080p和30帧/秒。亮度调节很快，但有明显的渐变。自动对焦时不时需要一点时间，直到再次产生清晰的图像。
前置摄像头分辨率为800万像素。即使在光线良好的情况下，自拍照在放大后看起来也有点暗淡和颗粒感。此外，在暗处也无法拍摄。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
显示屏 - 几乎没有亮度
诺基亚G11 Plus的IPS屏幕分辨率为1,600 x 720像素，这在同类产品中是很常见的，但其屏幕分辨率却只有1,600 x 720像素。 三星Galaxy A14 LTE显示全高清也是可能的。遗憾的是，诺基亚并没有安装特别亮的屏幕。在我们使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中，它甚至没有达到400 cd/m²。因此，室外使用可能会很困难，尤其是在明亮的日子里。
即使在很低的亮度下，我们也没有注意到 PWM，但却明显偏蓝，导致色彩还原不准确。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 1317:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.639
| Nokia G11 Plus IPS, 1600x720, 6.52 | Nokia G11 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Motorola Moto G13 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -29% | -29% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.7 ? | 48 ? -1% | 48.5 ? -2% | 35.55 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.8 ? | 34 ? -56% | 33.8 ? -55% | 15.68 ? 28% |
| PWM Frequency | 343500 | |||
| Screen | -2% | 24% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 395 | 502 27% | 555 41% | 465 18% |
| Brightness | 385 | 486 26% | 553 44% | 439 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 93 -1% | 89 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.53 -77% | 0.29 3% | 0.47 -57% |
| Contrast | 1317 | 947 -28% | 1914 45% | 989 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.21 | 5.73 8% | 5.17 17% | 8.5 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.61 | 8.72 18% | 10.61 -0% | 15.8 -49% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 6.8 18% | 4.5 46% | 11.8 -42% |
| Gamma | 2.639 83% | 2.352 94% | 2.131 103% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7999 81% | 8800 74% | 7380 88% | 10757 60% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-7% | -3% /
14% | 2% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 日常使用中出现卡顿
产品 Unisoc T606已经作为SoC安装在 诺基亚G11因此，两者的性能水平相似也就不足为奇了。与同价位手机相比，该机的性能相当低，在浏览菜单时已经出现卡顿，即使是简单的应用程序也需要很长时间才能加载。
这也是由于在存储方面仅使用了慢速eMMC闪存，这在同价位产品中是正常的。
在较长的加载时间下，手机会明显发热：我们测得的温度高达48.5 °C。这一点非常明显。SoC在重负载时也会略有节流：在3DMark压力测试中，我们测得的性能仍为开始时的95.4%。
诺基亚G11 Plus背面有一个单声道扬声器，一个小塑料旋钮可以防止手机完全平放在桌面上并覆盖扬声器。不过，在柔软的表面上仍会出现这种情况。
扬声器可以发出相当大的声音，但听起来高音很重，分辨力不强，几乎听不到单个乐器的声音。3.5毫米音频接口可用于连接外部音频设备或蓝牙，可使用最必要的编解码器。通过aptX HD和LDAC，还可以实现更高质量的音频传输。
诺基亚G11 Plus的充电功率仅为10瓦，而之前的诺基亚G11支持18瓦特。由于5,000毫安时的电池容量与前代产品几乎一样大，因此充满电所需的时间要长得多，即长达3小时。在我们的Wi-Fi电池测试中，G11 Plus的续航时间为17:18小时，可以轻松满足一天的工作、学习或大学生活。如果不经常使用手机，第二天的电量也是足够的。
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=9) | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (473 - 5538, n=219, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1318, n=9) | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 19783, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 7912, n=9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (9.5 - 11, n=8) | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.9 - 175, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (1.9 - 5.5, n=8) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 100, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (6 - 7.1, n=8) | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 72, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 2, n=8) | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.38 - 33, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (0.8 - 0.85, n=4) | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (9871 - 12642, n=4) | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | Nokia G11 | Motorola Moto G13 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 19% | -12% | -45% | 280% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 270.6 | 252.7 -7% | 281.1 4% | 298.69 10% | 242 ? -11% | 1284 ? 375% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196 | 187.6 -4% | 244.7 25% | 200.17 2% | 100.5 ? -49% | 902 ? 360% |
| Random Read 4KB | 81.5 | 48.2 -41% | 99.4 22% | 55.9 -31% | 43.1 ? -47% | 225 ? 176% |
| Random Write 4KB | 77.1 | 59 -23% | 94.9 23% | 55.86 -28% | 22.1 ? -71% | 239 ? 210% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
发言人
Nokia G11 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Average of class Smartphone (424 - 1502, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Pros
Cons
评价 - 相机和软件更新令人信服
诺基亚G11 Plus的主摄像头比上一代产品更好，屏幕也稍大一些。在其他方面，诺基亚G11 Plus与诺基亚G11相比没有任何变化。 诺基亚G11但也有一些缺点：电池容量略小，在运行时间方面几乎没有任何变化。更令人讨厌的是充电速度更慢和屏幕更暗。
我们喜欢这款手机的定期更新，实际上每月都有更新，而且应该持续到2026年。对于这样一款廉价手机来说，这是一件好事。手机壳很漂亮，非常坚固，甚至具有基本的防水功能。我们还喜欢纯净的Android 、稳定的WLAN连接和可靠的指纹传感器。
在性能方面，您不能对这个价位的手机抱有太高的期望，扬声器也只是权宜之计。至少最重要的蓝牙编解码器是可用的，因此您也可以顺利连接更高品质的耳机。
诺基亚G11 Plus拥有同价位手机中不错的摄像头，但在充电功率和屏幕亮度方面有所欠缺。
如果摄像头不是那么重要，您也可以选择 诺基亚G11会更省钱。三星 三星Galaxy A14屏幕分辨率更高。
价格和供货情况
在测试期间，诺基亚G11 Plus在美国亚马逊等互联网零售商的售价约为330美元。
Nokia G11 Plus
-
07/13/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
