Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 智能手机评测--用潘通色看世界

Style-o-mat. 摩托罗拉新款顶级手机最重要的特点是:时尚。新颖的配色、经过潘通认证的屏幕和摄像头颜色,以及大量的定制选项,都让这款手机适合每个用户。但它的内部构造是否同样令人印象深刻呢?
5G ARM Android Smartphone

摩托罗拉(Motorola)再次对其 Edge 系列产品进行了改良:继 Edge 20 Pro之后,这些设备的价格越来越高,直到 Edge 40 Pro并最终成为摩托罗拉的顶级智能手机。今年,Edge 50 Ultra 发布了,这意味着 Edge 50 Pro 必须腾出一些空间,价格也有所下降,现在的价格正好与 Edge 20 Pro的价格:约 750 美元。

不过,它不再配备真正的旗舰处理器,摄像头也没有光学潜望镜变焦功能。如果你看一下它的规格表,就会发现低重量、纤薄机身、大屏幕和快速充电功能都为这款设备代言。

不过,在这个价格档次中,摩托罗拉必须与一些强劲的竞争对手竞争,例如 三星Galaxy S23 FE小米 14.在我们的测试过程中,Edge 50 Pro 能否跟上他们的步伐,我们拭目以待。

Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Edge 50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A715 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 444 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, 360Hz sampling rate, DC dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.2 x 72.4
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 125W (Motorola TurboPower), 50W (Motorola TurboPower wireless), 10W (reverse charging wireless)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.4, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), laser-AF, OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2); 10.0MP, f/​2.0, phase comparison-AF, OIS, telephoto lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.9, phase comparison-AF, Videos @2160p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, IP68-certified, eSIM support, , fanless, waterproof
Weight
186 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.6 %
05/2024
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720
186 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2712x1220
89.4 %
05/2023
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
199 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.5 %
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
209 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
89.8 %
01/2024
Xiaomi 14
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
193 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2670x1200
87.4 %
08/2023
Nothing Phone (2)
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
201.2 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080

外壳 - 完美集成的相机模块

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 是一款非常纤薄的智能手机,边缘呈圆形,屏幕边缘被拉过两侧。它非常适合握在手中,并且具有稳定和高质量的构造。我们只是注意到了一些小问题:屏幕上方和背面底部的金属边框边缘可以摸到,因此无法完美贴合。当你试图扭动手机时,它还会发出轻微的吱吱声。

我们测试的紫色手机背面采用了橡胶人造革材料,握感非常好,而且不易沾染指纹。此外,黑色也采用了人造皮革材料。最引人注目的颜色是月光珍珠色,由意大利珍珠母制成。

无论您最终选择哪种颜色,相机模块都安装在左上方,并以轻微的弧度与背面的其他部分分开。它与机身浑然一体,看起来并无异物感。

在重量方面,摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 比所有对比设备及其前代产品都要轻,仅重 186 克。尽管它的屏幕尺寸是同类产品中最大的。手机包装在一个散发着摩托罗拉定制香味的香盒中。手机背面的合成皮革也吸收了这种香味,触摸手机后还能闻到手上的香味。至于你是否喜欢这种香味,这可能是一个品味问题。

该手机壳通过了 IP68 防水防尘认证,因此您可以将它浸入淡水中几分钟而不会损坏手机。


尺寸比较

162.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.6 mm 201.2 g161.2 mm 74.8 mm 8.6 mm 199 g161.2 mm 72.4 mm 8.2 mm 186 g158 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 209 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 8.2 mm 193 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 大量存储空间和 DisplayPort

Edge 50 Pro 拥有 12GB 内存和 512GB 大容量存储空间,配置非常完善,可以与最新的高端手机相媲美。不过,它的大容量存储只有 UFS 2.2 闪存。稍后我们将详细介绍它在速度方面的损失。

USB 3.0 端口可确保稍快的数据传输速度,由于没有 3.5 毫米耳机插孔,它还能输出音频信号。此外,由于手机的 USB 端口支持 DisplayPort 1.4,因此还可以连接外接屏幕。手机还配备了 NFC 功能,可用于无线支付或与附近的其他设备进行通信。

SIM 卡插槽位于设备底部边缘,但只能安装一张 nano SIM 卡。即便如此,你也不必放弃双 SIM 卡功能,因为这款摩托罗拉手机支持 eSIM 卡。

首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C 接口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
底部:扬声器、USB-C 接口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
右:音量摇杆、待机键
右:音量摇杆、待机键
左:无连接
左:无连接

软件 - 人工智能功能和Android 14

摩托罗拉在其智能手机上安装了Android 14,但对谷歌的操作系统没有做任何改动。此外,制造商还在手机上安装了 Moto 应用程序,通过该程序可以访问手势控制和全时显示等所有附加功能。这一点相当聪明,因为有时只需进行简单的应用程序更新,就能添加新功能。

手机上预装了不少第三方赞助的应用程序,但卸载起来相对容易。总的来说,摩托罗拉对软件进行了精简,但即便如此,它还是安装了几个自己的应用程序,用于数字健康、设备支持以及Ready For,你可以用它将手机连接到显示器或电脑上。

摩托罗拉承诺在未来四年内都会提供安全补丁,这款手机肯定会在Android 15 中看到。当然,它的新人工智能功能也很重要--比如,你可以创建一个背景图片来搭配照片中的服装。

它通过了 Widevine L1 认证,因此您可以享受来自所有主流平台的高清流媒体内容。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 高速无线局域网和快速 5G

Edge 50 Pro 支持 WiFi 6E(IEEE 802.11ax),因此它一方面可以连接到较少使用的 6 GHz 频段,另一方面可以更好地应对同一区域内的许多无线信号。理论上,这种无线标准的传输速率可达 4804 MBit/s。实际上,我们在摩托罗拉手机上测得的最高传输速率约为 1,600 MBit/s,与其他设备的传输速率一致。

这意味着 Edge 50 Pro 也可以使用千兆互联网线路。全速通常只能在内部网络中使用,但这也需要相应的硬件,如路由器、网线和另一端的终端设备。无论如何,Edge 50 Pro 在连接无线局域网时速度非常快。

在靠近路由器的地方,即使是大型网站,手机也能快速加载,并能获得完整的信号。在距离接入点 10 米远的地方,中间隔着 3 面墙,它仍然能显示 100 % 的信号,网页加载速度也非常快。

在智能手机的 5G 和 4G 信号范围内,有许多频率都可以使用,因此这款手机也可以用于在全球大多数国家连接网络。在我们的测试中,它的接收效果令人印象深刻,在某些情况下甚至超过了其他高端手机。

Networking
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼62%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
824 (min: 689) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
826 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
iperf3 receive AXE11000
914 (min: 461) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1588 (min: 1465) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 1398) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi 14
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼100%
Nothing Phone (2)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1513 (min: 1097) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
799 (min: 577) MBit/s ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
662 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
696 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1546 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1375 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼79%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1600 (1384-1648)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1080 (838-1239)
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

如果您走出家门,很快就能找到您的位置,精确度为 3 米。如果设备缺少用于卫星导航的附加 SBAS 系统,通常的精确度就是这样,而摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 正是如此。

我们想知道这款智能手机在日常导航和确定位置方面到底有多出色,为此,我们带着它和 Garmin Venu 2 一起骑车旅行,进行比较--这是一款具有非常精确定位功能的智能手表。

Edge 50 Pro 没有理由退缩:手机非常精确地记录了我们的路线,即使是狭窄的小巷也没有让手机感到慌乱。除了零星的小偏差,这款摩托罗拉手表非常适合日常导航使用,即使你对它有很高的要求。

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 定位服务 - 概述
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 定位服务 - 概述
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 定位服务 - 转折点
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 定位服务 - 转折点
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 定位服务 - 桥接
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接

电话功能和通话质量 - 通话质量极佳

这款手机使用谷歌的标准电话和联系人应用程序。

它的通话质量非常好:无论我们说什么,都能很好地传递给电话另一端的人。而在我们这边,对方听起来就像站在我们身边一样。通过安装的扬声器和免提麦克风,通话也能非常清晰地传送。此外,背景噪音也得到了很好的抑制。

相机 - 镜头很多,但没有潜望镜变焦镜头

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

Edge 50 Pro 采用 5000 万像素摄像头作为主摄像头,最大光圈为 f/1.4。这意味着你无需任何软件帮助就能获得漂亮的模糊效果,而且还能确保在阴暗环境下的高得光率。此外,光学图像稳定器还能防止拍摄时晃动。

用这款相机拍摄的照片色彩艳丽,这是因为 Pantone 认证了这款手机的相机:所有色彩值都是按照 Pantone 确定的标准记录和再现的。它的细节水平很高,HDR 功能能可靠地照亮暗部,而不会灼伤图像的亮部。不过,在我们周围环境照片的某些区域,您会发现阳光照射区域略微过亮。

在光线很暗、对比度很高的情况下,照片也能很好地变亮,同时,烛火依然清晰可辨,不会曝光过度。图像清晰度非常高。

手机背面还有一个 1300 万像素的超广角镜头。它能呈现出良好的色彩,但细节会丢失。此外,该手机还可以使用 1000 万像素的长焦镜头进行超近距离拍摄,该镜头还带有光学图像稳定器,并增加了手机的焦距范围。该设备还可将其用于可选的混合变焦,即提高数字变焦的质量。

录制的视频最高可达 4K,而 Edge 40 Pro 已经可以录制 8K 视频。自动对焦和曝光调整工作速度很快,而且基本不可见。拍摄出的图像清晰锐利,对靠近镜头的物体有很好的虚化效果。拍摄时可以切换镜头,但有时会很不稳定,自动对焦也不总是很精确。不过,这大大增加了手机的创作可能性。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightUltra-wide-angle camera

我们利用实验室检查了手机摄像头在可控光线条件下的表现。为此,我们在全棚光照和 1 勒克斯光照条件下拍摄了测试图。

测试图表的中间部分看起来仍然相当清晰,但边缘部分的清晰度略有下降。红色背景前的文字看起来有点模糊,但总体而言,清晰度不错。在 1 勒克斯条件下,图像清晰度急剧下降,几乎无法辨认细节,画面也只是稍微变亮。

ColorChecker
19 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 50 Pro: 14.04 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 21.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.9 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
50.4 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
53 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
59.3 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
36 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 50 Pro: 37.98 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 59.28 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括充电器

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 的包装盒包括一个充电器、USB 数据线、硅胶保护套和一个用于打开 SIM 卡插槽的 SIM 卡工具。在摩托罗拉的网站上找不到这款智能手机的任何特殊配件。

制造商为这款手机提供 12 个月的标准保修。您可以通过 MotoCare 扩大保修范围,例如在显示屏损坏时提供保护或延长手机保修期。在特定情况下,您可以为非通过 motorola.com 直接购买的设备申请 MotoCare 计划。

输入设备和操作 - 精确的触摸屏

这款手机使用谷歌标准键盘 GBoard。如果不喜欢,可以通过 PlayStore 下载并安装其他键盘应用程序。只是要警惕不可信的供应商。

触摸屏的输入扫描频率高达每秒 360 次,反应快速可靠。其边缘的手掌识别功能非常精确,因此可以避免大多数意外或不必要的输入。硬件按键位于设备的右侧,它们由金属制成,你可以很好地触摸到它们。

指纹传感器集成在显示屏上。即使在熄屏状态下,它的反应也相当可靠。不过,解锁手机时会有轻微延迟。此外,传感器位于屏幕下方。这有时会导致在不调整握持方式的情况下很难触碰到它。

您还可以通过面部识别解锁手机,但这只是一种二维方法,使用的是前置摄像头,没有任何额外的传感器。尽管如此,它的工作速度还是相当快,而且屏幕亮度通常也足以在较暗的环境中识别人脸。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 大量潘通色像素

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

这款智能手机的 P-OLED 屏幕具有 2,712 x 1,220 像素的超高分辨率,超过了前代产品。此外,该屏幕直径达 6.7 英寸,非常大,亮度高达 1,086 cd/m²(描绘全白屏幕)。当显示较小的区域时,屏幕实际上会更亮--在 APL18 测试中,我们测得的亮度为 1,453 cd/m²。

这意味着 HDR 内容可以充分显示,面板的 Pantone 验证确保了准确的色彩描绘:与相机一样,Pantone 也确保了色彩的准确描绘。

事实上,我们非常喜欢它的色彩描绘,与 sRGB 色彩空间相比,它也非常准确。我们注意到几乎没有任何相关偏差,这意味着该显示器非常适合专业评估色调。

屏幕的最高显示频率为 144 Hz,与刷新率为 165 Hz 的前代屏幕相比,在最佳状态下显示速度稍慢。不过,在日常使用中你应该不会注意到这种差异。

1086
cd/m²
1053
cd/m²
1026
cd/m²
1080
cd/m²
1064
cd/m²
1002
cd/m²
1075
cd/m²
954
cd/m²
1005
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1086 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1038.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.631 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 1064 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.70
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Dynamic AMOLED x2, 2340x1080, 6.40
Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.36
Nothing Phone (2)
OLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Screen
-1%
-20%
1%
6%
Brightness middle
1064
1056
-1%
897
-16%
1043
-2%
951
-11%
Brightness
1038
1055
2%
908
-13%
1052
1%
948
-9%
Brightness Distribution
88
92
5%
97
10%
96
9%
98
11%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.17
1.28
-9%
2.2
-88%
1.1
6%
1
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.47
2.85
-15%
3.1
-26%
2.8
-13%
2.2
11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.7
15%
1.7
15%
1.9
5%
1.6
20%
Gamma
2.238 98%
2.206 100%
2.08 106%
2.23 99%
2.203 100%
CCT
6423 101%
6320 103%
6617 98%
6740 96%
6516 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 714 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 714 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 714 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

在亮度很低的情况下,我们测得闪烁频率为 714 cd/m²。摩托罗拉公司表示,该屏幕采用了直流调光技术。

在查看不同亮度水平的截图时,你只能看到亮度的轻微波动,这意味着对于敏感的人来说,使用该显示屏也没有问题。不过,购买前试用一下也无妨。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

在室外,得益于明亮的屏幕,手机即使在白天也清晰可见。阳光直射会产生反光,但即便如此,屏幕内容仍然清晰可见。当然,在阴凉处使用设备会更舒适。

除了亮度的一些微小变化外,即使从非常平的角度观看,手机屏幕上的内容仍然清晰可见。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能--本可更上一层楼

如果你看看摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 的 SoC(动力装置),你可能会有些失望:它的前辈们都采用了高端的骁龙 8 系列 SoC,而 Edge 50 Pro 却只配备了骁龙 7 代 3 SoC。

尽管 Edge 50 Pro 仍能提供强劲的动力,但它的性能往往赶不上前代产品 Edge 40 Pro。 Edge 40 Pro在我们的基准测试中,许多同价位的对比设备都比它快得多。特别是在人工智能计算方面,这款处理器落后了。

现在的问题是,在日常使用中,你是否会真正注意到性能上的这种差异:这取决于您打算如何使用手机以及您的期望值是什么。在任何情况下都可以流畅地浏览手机。多任务处理也不会给 SoC 带来任何问题。

只有当您进行非常复杂的计算并经常使用专门的人工智能应用程序时,您才会注意到它们的运行速度会变慢。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points +87%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1719 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1601 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=117, last 2 years)
1357 Points +18%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1147 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
1147 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points +121%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4584 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3938 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=117, last 2 years)
3767 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
3129 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
3129 Points 0%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points +158%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=56, last 2 years)
1220708 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1124908 Points +47%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
767395 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
767395 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17620 Points +16%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
16612 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
15165 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
15165 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15130 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
13573 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=201, last 2 years)
11960 Points -21%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points +53%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1116 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
888 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=159, last 2 years)
851 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
778 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
759 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
759 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10370 Points +72%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7839 Points +30%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7466 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7179 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
6028 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
6028 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=156, last 2 years)
5959 Points -1%
System
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15741 Points +40%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12171 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
11239 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
11239 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11159 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11081 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=156, last 2 years)
9890 Points -12%
Memory
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11252 Points +97%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8458 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7614 Points +33%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
6601 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=156, last 2 years)
6470 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
5719 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
5719 Points 0%
Graphics
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
31876 Points +140%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
26837 Points +102%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19110 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17941 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=156, last 2 years)
15017 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
13308 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
13308 Points 0%
Web
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2048 Points +33%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1919 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1755 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1572 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
1543 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=156, last 2 years)
1529 Points -1%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=144, last 2 years)
21424 Points +138%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18370 Points +104%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15782 Points +76%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13807 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10374 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
8985 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
8985 Points 0%
AImark - Score v3.x
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
128240 Points +17786%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=110, last 2 years)
17435 Points +2332%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1381 Points +93%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
941 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
717 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  ()
717 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
0 Points -100%

它的 GPU 性能也很强劲,但没有顶级性能。不过,即使是要求苛刻的图形处理,在屏幕的原生分辨率下也能流畅运行,只有 4K 或 1440p 才会让手机开始卡顿。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points +226%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3503 Points +141%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2538 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1451 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points +222%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3280 Points +123%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1474 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points +256%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6440 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6350 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4752 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps +209%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
479 fps +175%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 fps +101%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps +25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
174 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +55%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps +44%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -23%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +209%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
301 fps +181%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps +97%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
135 fps +26%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +102%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +48%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps +214%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +155%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +60%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +255%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +245%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +81%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +244%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +215%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +119%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +56%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +265%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +165%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +22%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +203%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +55%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +50%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps +263%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
151 fps +165%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps +245%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +155%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps +9%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 是一款上网速度非常快的智能手机:网页加载速度超快,通常在滚动时图片已经加载完毕。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points +75%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
178.548 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ()
123.2 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
123.193 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=163, last 2 years)
110.2 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
100.8 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
13.847 Points -89%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
264 runs/min +80%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
162 runs/min +10%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
147 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ()
147 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
137 runs/min -7%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=147, last 2 years)
114.2 runs/min -22%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chome 112)
70.4 runs/min -52%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points +90%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
147 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
130 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
103 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ()
103 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=154, last 2 years)
102.2 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
99 Points -4%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
243 Points +35%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
204 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
180 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ()
180 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
147 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=109, last 2 years)
139.2 Points -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points +75%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
52931 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
51202 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
39130 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ()
39130 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=208, last 2 years)
33762 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
31254 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=163, last 2 years)
1519 ms * -32%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
1265.2 ms * -10%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
1150 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ()
1150 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
840.3 ms * +27%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
755.5 ms * +34%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

这款手机的存储空间清楚地表明,摩托罗拉对其顶级设备的预算十分紧张:它只使用了相对较慢的 UFS 2.2 闪存,而它的前代产品已经使用了最新的 UFS 4.0,速度几乎快了三倍。因此,与其他顶级手机相比,摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 的数据传输和加载时间往往感觉相当缓慢。

Motorola Edge 50 ProMotorola Edge 40 ProSamsung Galaxy S23 FEXiaomi 14Nothing Phone (2)Average 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
122%
7%
123%
32%
-13%
3%
Sequential Read 256KB
1023.6
3434.4
236%
1657.44
62%
3385.74
231%
1949.5
90%
Sequential Write 256KB
1025.9
2887.4
181%
994.67
-3%
2906.65
183%
1517.6
48%
911 ?(795 - 1026, n=2)
-11%
Random Read 4KB
337
451.3
34%
322.32
-4%
420.99
25%
287.5
-15%
292 ?(247 - 337, n=2)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
390.2
539
38%
288.23
-26%
594.78
52%
403.8
3%
306 ?(222 - 390, n=2)
-22%

游戏 - 通常可以达到 60 赫兹

如果你希望用手机的 144 Hz 全帧频玩游戏,那么你会失望的。这与设备的性能绝无关系--相反,制造商通常不允许游戏开发者使用最大帧数,因为他们担心这会导致高温和高电池消耗。

在大多数游戏中,最高帧数只能达到 60fps,例如在玩其他设备上允许 120fps 的《源氏冲击》时,或者在《PUBG Mobile》中,我们看到最高帧数为 90fps 甚至更高。

不过,如果不选择最高设置,智能手机也能稳定地达到 60fps。在中低设置下,您可以非常流畅地玩游戏,没有一款游戏的帧数低于 34fps。我们使用GameBench软件套件测量了帧率。

此外,反应灵敏的触摸屏和功能良好的位置传感器也确保了操作的可靠性。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø59.4 (51-60)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø51.6 (34-60)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.1.0: Ø59 (45-60)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø59.7 (58-60)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.1.0: Ø39.6 (35-41)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; Diablo Immortal; 2.3.1: Ø59.5 (56-60)

排放物 - 外壳明显发热

温度

我们将 Edge 50 Pro 带到测试实验室,让它在连续最大负载下运行 Burnout 基准测试。一小时后,我们查看了机箱的温度。在室温下,我们测得绝对最高温度为 105.98 °F(41.1 °C)。

不过,在较高的环境温度下,例如在气候较热的地区或夏天,温度可能会更高。SoC 似乎对此略有影响,我们在多次重复基准测试时发现,在 "野外生活 "压力测试中出现了一些掉帧现象。

Max. Load
 41.1 °C39.6 °C37.2 °C 
 41 °C40 °C37.6 °C 
 41.1 °C39.1 °C37.6 °C 
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
37.2 °C38.6 °C38.3 °C
37.9 °C40.2 °C39.9 °C
35.5 °C39.9 °C41.1 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.9 % -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.7 % -26%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.2 % -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 %
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.3 % -12%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.6 % -24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.5 % -26%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.78 (8.73-8.83)
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.2 (14.8-19.9)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.59 (7.53-10.2)
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø10.3 (10.2-11.6)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (28.6-32.3)
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.5 (51.6-78.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø30.9 (26.6-38.1)
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (38.2-63.4)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

底部边缘的扬声器无需单独工作,因为它有听筒的支持。这使得立体声成为可能。扬声器的音量并不大,但足以充满一个中等大小的房间。

虽然没有低音,但仍能听到一些中低音。由于中高音也相当线性,因此音像效果总体不错。这意味着高音不会被过分强调,声音也相当温暖。

这意味着您可以通过手机扬声器享受音乐和电影音效--只是没有那么震撼。

如果你想连接耳机或外置扬声器,可以通过手机的 USB-C 端口和必要的适配器来实现,也可以选择蓝牙。摩托罗拉为此提供了全面的音频编解码器选择,从 SBC 和 AAC 到 LHDC V5、aptX Adaptive 和 Opus,不一而足。这样,您几乎可以连接任何蓝牙音频设备,并获得最佳音质。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.739.62533.234.83129.330.54032.337.15040.740.56332.644.78019.74010016.944.512515.537.516013.337.42009.635.825011.836.93159.243.54008.752.85001157.363013.259.680013.760.5100014.865.2125013.765.8160010.667.7200010.969.2250012.365.5315013.763.1400013.668.6500013.972.6630014.469.2800015.664.81000015.964.3125001662.61600016.752.7SPL25.879.1N0.741.9median 13.7median 62.6Delta2.19.74036.135.933.733.52834.532.136.533.927.526.720.319.420.321.220.632.122.337.217.936.513.842.215.149.112.555.711.958.611.661.914.467.514.370.212.472.710.473.810.672.11171.511.569.812.265.112.962.413.567.814.3701571.815.764.916.647.125.281.90.749.7median 13.8median 64.92.111.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 50 ProNothing Phone (2)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nothing Phone (2) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 快速充电和无线支持

耗电量

在空闲模式下,Edge 50 Pro 比同类设备更耗电,但在负载情况下却相当省电。

因此,Edge 智能手机支持高达 125 瓦的有线充电。手机随附一个相应的充电器,只需不到一个小时就能充满电。不过,最大的好处是,当设备电量不足而你又赶时间时,只需充电几分钟,就有足够的电量使用几个小时。

如果你喜欢用无线方式为手机供电,则可以使用高达 50 瓦的功率。此外,其他设备也可以通过摩托罗拉 Edge 50 以高达 10 瓦的功率进行无线充电,这对 TWS 耳机等设备非常有用。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 4.8 / 6.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
4600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-63%
-2%
-6%
0%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.7
22%
0.69
23%
0.51
43%
0.9
-0%
0.9 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
1.3
0.8
38%
1.15
12%
0.89
32%
1.1
15%
1.3 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.3
19%
1.26
21%
0.92
42%
1.4
12%
1.6 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
4.8
10
-108%
15.93
-232%
9.08
-89%
5
-4%
4.8 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
6.7
13.7
-104%
16.09
-140%
9.11
-36%
10.4
-55%
6.7 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.65 (0.953-6.75)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.161 (1.066-1.56)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.17 (4.82-5.42)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.161 (1.066-1.56)

运行时间

电池容量为 4,500 毫安时,因此比 Edge 40 Pro 和其他一些对比设备稍弱。不过,这在续航时间方面并不明显,因为摩托罗拉在这方面做得很好:您可以在网上冲浪长达 16:19 小时,应该可以应付一天的高强度使用。

如果你喜欢看电影,并将其存储在手机的内置存储空间中,例如从主要的流媒体服务提供商下载,那么在屏幕熄灭之前,你可以在屏幕前停留长达 18:40 小时。这还不够看完所有 8 部《哈利-波特》电影,但无论如何,在《魔法石》、《火焰杯》和《死亡圣器》之间稍作休息,加载并放松一下可能会更健康。

最突出的是它的超长负载运行时间,即使在没有电源插座的情况下也能保证超过 5 小时的游戏时间。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
31h 35min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 02min
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
4600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
-28%
27%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1895
2102
11%
1575
-17%
2926
54%
1744
-8%
H.264
1120
1062
-5%
1083
-3%
1674
49%
1245
11%
WiFi v1.3
979
984
1%
815
-17%
1092
12%
909
-7%
Load
302
297
-2%
73
-76%
277
-8%
268
-11%

Pros

+ 美观、稳定的外壳...
+ ...通过 IP 认证
+ 存储空间大
+ 灵活的摄像系统
+ 明亮的 AMOLED...
+ ... 色彩显示效果好
+ 高速无线局域网
+ 精确的定位服务
+ USB 端口支持 DisplayPort
+ 快速充电,无线充电
+ 运行时间长
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 支持 eSIM

Cons

- 无光学潜望镜变焦
- 在极差的照明条件下相机性能较弱
- 没有 8K 视频录制功能
- SoC 性能相对较弱
- 存储速度相对较慢
- 预装臃肿软件
- 个性化的香味包装

评价--降级后仍能给人留下深刻印象

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 评测。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供:德国摩托罗拉公司。
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 评测。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供:德国摩托罗拉公司。

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 是当前手机市场上的又一力作,因为它最终以适中的价格提供了出色的性能和连接选项以及高端功能。

在许多方面,这款手机都非常成功:它的外壳与智能手机几乎无缝集成的摄像头模块和可选的珠光表面处理、高速无线局域网、精确的定位服务以及明亮的高分辨率屏幕(拥有精确的色彩还原和 Pantone 认证)。

这款手机的电池可持续使用很长时间,如果需要,还可以快速充电--尽管我们建议通过设备设置降低充电功率,以改善电池的长期健康状况。

另一方面,我们不得不批评摩托罗拉的命名系统非常混乱:虽然今年推出功能更强大的 Ultra 机型是件好事,但 Pro 机型近年来一直是顶级机型,因此降级 Pro 机型并不合理。当然,制造商也可以想出一个不同的名字来更好地描述它的定位--与前代产品相比也是如此。

这是因为 Edge 50 Pro 比 Edge 40 Pro 便宜得多。 Edge 40 Pro但从性能上看,为了节省成本,它也面临着一些降级,如 SoC 速度更慢、存储速度更慢。在摄像头方面,它也节省了一两百万像素--至少主摄像头的光圈非常大。它的照片总体看起来不错,但你不得不继续忍受没有潜望镜变焦的烦恼。

摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 提供了物美价廉的连接功能,因此甚至可以与某些高端手机相媲美。

它的前身 Edge 40 Pro它的性能更好,但存储空间更小。小米 14 Pro 小米 14同样是一款极具吸引力的高端手机,它还提供强劲的动力和非常明亮的屏幕。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时,摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 尚未在美国上市。它的零售价可能在 750 美元左右。您可以通过制造商的亚马逊商店查看摩托罗拉的所有手机。

Motorola Edge 50 Pro - 05/07/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
57 / 70 → 81%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
50 / 64 → 78%
Application Performance
82 / 86 → 95%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
76%
Average
81%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 智能手机评测--用潘通色看世界
Florian Schmitt, 2024-05-10 (Update: 2024-05-28)