判决
如果您只需要笔记本电脑完成基本任务，Chromebook 是一个不错的选择。华硕Chromebook CX14 就是一个很好的例子；由于采用了被动散热系统，它可以做到完全静音。华硕还在其坚固的机身中配备了优质键盘和长效电池。仅从外观上看，您可能会认为它是一款昂贵得多的设备。
然而，这种奢侈的静音效果是以其他方面的严重妥协为代价的。即使是轻量级的 ChromeOS，CX14 所搭载的英特尔赛扬处理器的性能也达到了可接受的最低极限，多任务处理非常考验耐心。不过，最大的弱点还是显示屏：屏幕暗淡无光，可视角度不佳，与原本坚固的机身不符。归根结底，这是一款针对特定人群的设备：如果你正在寻找一款价格低廉、功能强大的工具，主要用于在图书馆或演讲厅等安静的环境中打字，而不太在意图像质量或速度，那么你可能会在这里找到合适的伴侣。而对于其他人来说，缓慢的性能和糟糕的显示效果之间的折衷可能会太大。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在欧洲，华硕Chromebook CX1405CKA 是 2025 年 5 月底才正式上市的全新设备。在撰写本文时，这款Chromebook 在我们的测试配置中以 300 欧元的价格在 Otto 等网站上市.
配备英特尔酷睿 N150 的 CX14性能稍强，在亚马逊（德国）的售价为 280 欧元（约合 326 美元）。此外，还有Chromebook Plus 版本的 CX14，售价为 380 欧元（约合 442 美元）。除了更强大的英特尔酷睿3 N355外，后者还配备了更好的IPS显示屏。
*译者注：截至 2025 年 5 月，华硕Chromebook CX14 系列（包括 CX1405CKA）正式宣布在美国上市，起售价为 279 美元。该产品还在百思买（Best Buy）和好市多（Costco）等零售商处在线销售。用户还可以查看常见的经销商，如 亚马逊 和百思买等常见转售商。
- $12.98Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film Protector, compatible with ASUS Chromebook CX14 CX1405 CX1405CKA 14" Laptop TPU TouchPad Trackpad Guard （ Not Tempered Glass Screen Protectors ）
- $265.91ASUS Chromebook CX15 Laptop, 15.6" FHD Anti-Glare Display, Intel Celeron N4500 Processor, 128GB Storage, 8GB RAM, ChromeOS, Pure Grey, CX1505CKA-AS88F-PG
规格
箱子和设备
通常情况下，"塑料外壳 "并不代表质量好。然而，这款Chromebook 却给人一种出奇的踏实感，即使紧握也不会发出嘎吱嘎吱的响声。华硕为塑料外壳设计了一种粗糙的织物纹理，这种纹理很独特，能提供良好的握持感。我们的测试机只有简单的浅灰色，但也有蓝色和深灰色的碳纤维外观版本。总之，它看起来或感觉上一点也不廉价。
接口很基本。华硕做出了一个有趣的设计选择，将所有端口都放在左侧。这可能很方便，也可能很烦人，具体取决于桌面设置。有一个 USB-C 端口，可处理所有基本功能：以 5 Gbit/s 的速度传输数据、为电池充电以及连接外部显示器。720p 网络摄像头足以偶尔进行视频聊天。
可持续性
该设备的包装包括纸板和纸张，但也有一些塑料薄膜。在使用寿命方面，Chromebook 是一个特例。这款设备的更新至少可以持续到 2031 年 6 月，但目前还没有升级硬件的计划。不过，令人惊讶的是，CX1405CKA 的打开非常容易。
输入设备
键盘的打字舒适度令人惊讶。虽然压力点相当柔软，但键程却相当宽松，远远超过一毫米。这避免了在坚硬的表面上打字的感觉，使长时间打字变得舒适。触摸板的尺寸为 10.5 × 7.5 厘米，对于 14 英寸设备来说已经足够大了。更重要的是，触摸板表面光滑，对手指动作的响应没有明显延迟。
显示屏
Chromebook 采用 1920 x 1080 像素、60 Hz 分辨率，这是 Chromebook 的标准配置。然而，显示屏的底层技术才是真正的决定因素，这也是低价的显而易见之处：华硕使用的是 TN 面板。这种设计有一个主要缺点：视角稳定性差。如果不从正面直视屏幕，色彩很快就会失真，画面也会变得苍白。
这一点在色彩还原方面也很明显。由于色域不到 sRGB 色彩空间的 60%，图像明显缺乏活力。这对于日常使用来说已经足够，但对于眼睛来说却不是一种享受。250 cd/m² 的亮度足以满足室内使用。磨砂表面有助于防止恼人的反光，但对于户外工作来说，屏幕实在是太暗了。积极的一面是，屏幕的响应时间尚可，亮度控制没有 PWM 闪烁，对眼睛很好。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 1054:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Argyll: 11.1 (sRGB) Calman: 10 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale 11.1 (Argyll) Calman: 9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
56% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.961, Argyll:
CCT: 14097 K
| Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA TN, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 IPS, 1920x1200, 11", 60 Hz | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 CMN 14E5, TN, 1920x1080, 14", Hz | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -30% | -32% | -28% | -16% | 26% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 37 ? 14% | 35 ? 19% | 37 ? 14% | 30.8 ? 29% | 2.8 ? 94% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.2 ? | 23 ? -74% | 24 ? -82% | 22.4 ? -70% | 21.2 ? -61% | 18.8 ? -42% |
| PWM Frequency | 2000 ? | 24800 ? | 60 | |||
| PWM Amplitude * | 80 | 33 | ||||
| Screen | 29% | 32% | -19% | 38% | 104% | |
| Brightness middle | 253 | 423.1 67% | 306 21% | 230 -9% | 344 36% | 415 64% |
| Brightness | 236 | 397 68% | 284 20% | 204 -14% | 333 41% | 416 76% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 85 -2% | 81 -7% | 94 8% | 97 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.2845 -19% | 0.1871 22% | 0.433 -80% | 0.263 -10% | 0.0722 70% |
| Contrast | 1054 | 1487 41% | 1635 55% | 531 -50% | 1308 24% | 5748 445% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10 | 4.76 52% | 4.88 51% | 8.91 11% | 4 60% | 3.84 62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22 | 11.69 47% | 8.39 62% | 19.81 10% | 7 68% | 13.93 37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9 | 11.7 -30% | 6.3 30% | 10.3 -14% | 2 78% | 2.7 70% |
| Gamma | 1.961 112% | 2.186 101% | 2.081 106% | 2.239 98% | 2.174 101% | 2.271 97% |
| CCT | 14097 46% | 8417 77% | 7117 91% | 11724 55% | 6757 96% | 6995 93% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
17% | 0% /
20% | -24% /
-21% | 11% /
27% | 65% /
89% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8265 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
观点分析
性能
需要明确的是：这款Chromebook 并非赛马。它配备的双核 英特尔赛扬 N4500内存。这样的组合足以完成最基本的任务，例如打开几个标签浏览网页、撰写电子邮件和观看 YouTube 视频。然而，当你尝试执行多任务时，系统很快就会开始卡顿，这对于Chromebook 来说是不寻常的。与其他廉价 Chromebook（通常使用 ARM 处理器，如 Mediatek Kompanio）相比，英特尔芯片在性能方面明显落后。
该机使用 128GB eMMC 作为内存。不过，对于日常使用来说，读写速度还是相当快的。
除非您使用云游戏服务和快速网络连接，或者玩基本 3D 图形的简单游戏，否则不要尝试在这款设备上玩游戏。
| Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), Celeron N4500, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 Mali-G57 MP3, Kompanio 838, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H UHD Graphics 32EUs, i3-N305, Kingston OM8PGP4128Q-AA | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 Mali-G52 MP2, Kompanio 520, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE UHD Graphics 64EUs, i3-1315U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA UHD Graphics 64EUs, Core 3 100U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6.4 | 112% | 288% | 489% | 541% | ||
| GPU Vulkan | 1591 | 1861 17% | 5493 245% | 8753 450% | 8436 430% | |
| Multi-Core | 757 | 2291 203% | 4329 472% | 5403 614% | 6620 775% | |
| Single-Core | 462 | 1003 117% | 1146 148% | 2323 403% | 2389 417% | |
| CrossMark | 34% | 174% | -11% | 268% | 255% | |
| Responsiveness | 360 | 381 6% | 1004 179% | 258 -28% | 1308 263% | 1137 216% |
| Creativity | 319 | 550 72% | 1050 229% | 340 7% | 1421 345% | 1439 351% |
| Productivity | 464 | 554 19% | 1012 118% | 393 -15% | 1389 199% | 1368 195% |
| Overall | 381 | 524 38% | 1027 170% | 348 -9% | 1391 265% | 1360 257% |
| PCMark for Android | -48% | 2% | -58% | 65% | 59% | |
| Work 3.0 | 7878 | 10843 38% | 11631 48% | 6924 -12% | 12986 65% | 14174 80% |
| Storage 2.0 random write int. | 2.32 | 1.21 -48% | 1.59 -31% | 1.09 -53% | 1.65 -29% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. write int. | 128.79 | 76.4 -41% | 292.4 127% | 81.31 -37% | 208.14 62% | |
| Storage 2.0 random read int. | 90.98 | 4.84 -95% | 43 -53% | 6.6 -93% | 206.92 127% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. read int. | 2205.08 | 113.16 -95% | 374.61 -83% | 99.17 -96% | 3429.91 56% | |
| WebXPRT 4 | ||||||
| Overall | 108 | 138 28% | 194 80% | 80 -26% | 243 125% | 259 140% |
| GFXBench 3.1 | ||||||
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | 22 | 34 55% | 58 164% | 15 -32% | 92 318% | 101 359% |
| GFXBench | ||||||
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 3.6 | 6.2 | 1.4 | 11 | 11 | |
| GPUScore: Sacred Path | ||||||
| 2560x1440 Official | 2.85 | 5.3 | 9.7 | 13.98 | ||
| GPUScore: The Expedition | ||||||
| 2560x1440 Official | 5.2 | 7.43 43% | 14.8 185% | 29.1 460% | 29.65 470% | |
| 3DMark | ||||||
| Wild Life Extreme | 343 | 514 50% | 203 -41% | 1983 478% | 2059 500% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
25% | 149% /
133% | -34% /
-36% | 315% /
332% | 332% /
275% |
排放和能源
温度和噪音排放
由于采用了完全被动式冷却系统，Chromebook 非常安静。由于 N4500 的 TDP 较低，即使在持续负载的情况下，其表面也几乎不会明显发热。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.5 °C / 72.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+5.1 °C / 9.2 F).
| Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA Intel Celeron N4500, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 MediaTek Kompanio 838, ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H Intel Core i3-N305, Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 MediaTek Kompanio 520, ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE Intel Core i3-1315U, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA Intel Core 3 100U, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | 7% | 11% | -21% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.1 | 38.3 -1% | 35.1 8% | 30.4 20% | 40 -5% | 39.1 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37.9 | 38.1 -1% | 41.1 -8% | 37.1 2% | 50 -32% | 38.3 -1% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 31.5 -16% | 23.5 13% | 21.8 20% | 29.7 -10% | 29.1 -7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.9 | 27.2 -5% | 22.6 13% | 25.9 -0% | 35 -35% | 28.1 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
幸运的是，内置扬声器的音量出人意料地好，绝对适合日常使用，甚至能让更大的房间也充满音效。
Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
华硕随Chromebook 提供了一个 45 瓦的电源装置。我们的测量结果表明，即使我们通过基准测试将系统性能提升到极限，该设备的总能耗也几乎没有超过 15 瓦。在正常的日常使用中，能耗甚至要低得多。
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.12 Watt |
| Idle |  2.1 / 3 / 5 Watt |
| Load |
/ 12.99 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA Celeron N4500, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 Kompanio 838, Mali-G57 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 11" | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H i3-N305, UHD Graphics 32EUs, Kingston OM8PGP4128Q-AA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 Kompanio 520, Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE i3-1315U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, , 1920x1200, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA Core 3 100U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, , AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -42% | -43% | -122% | -127% | -92% | -179% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.1 | 1.7 19% | 2 5% | 3.03 -44% | 4.85 -131% | 4.5 -114% | 5.26 ? -150% | 4.56 ? -117% |
| Idle Average * | 3 | 4.5 -50% | 3 -0% | 5.7 -90% | 5.35 -78% | 5.21 -74% | 6.16 ? -105% | 7.43 ? -148% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5 | 4.9 2% | 6 -20% | 7.7 -54% | 6.7 -34% | 9.44 -89% | 7.22 ? -44% | 8.91 ? -78% |
| Load Maximum * | 12.99 | 9.98 23% | 33 -154% | 11.1 15% | 45 -246% | 43 -231% | 21.8 ? -68% | 61.5 ? -373% |
| Load Average * | 4.37 | 10.9 | 8.7 | 12.5 | 16.2 ? | 41.2 ? |
* ... smaller is better
能耗测量
电池寿命
在我们的 Wi-Fi 上网冲浪测试中，CX14 的 42 Wh 电池可持续使用 9 个多小时。不过，Chromebook 并非高效的奇迹。直接比较显示，采用 ARM 处理器的竞争对手，如 Chromebook CM14的运行时间明显更长。
| Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA Celeron N4500, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), 42 Wh | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 Kompanio 838, Mali-G57 MP3, 29 Wh | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H i3-N305, UHD Graphics 32EUs, 51 Wh | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 Kompanio 520, Mali-G52 MP2, 42 Wh | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE i3-1315U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, 51 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA Core 3 100U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, 68 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 566.1 | 696 23% | 660 17% | 725 28% | 555.4 -2% | 779 38% | 700 ? 24% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
一方面，它有令人印象深刻的优势：完全静音和低温运行、令人惊讶的高品质制造和良好的输入设备。另一方面，它也有明显的缺点，那就是处理器的性能非常差，显示屏也只能满足基本需求。
Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA
- 07/10/2025 v8
Marc Herter
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 65.6%  | Asus Chromebook CX1405CKA Intel Celeron N4500 ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $34.99 Laptop Case Cover for ASUS C... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 3. $265.91 ASUS Chromebook CX15 Laptop,... | 1.4 kg | 20 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 TN |
2. 77.8%  | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 MediaTek Kompanio 838 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP3 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $21.99 INSOLKIDON Compatible with L... 2. $12.99 SLRIOYS 65W 45W USB C Charge... 3. $21.18 HJSFRBMA Folding Stand Funda... List Price: 450€ | 874 g | 17 mm | 10.95" 1920x1200 207 PPI IPS |
3. 79.5%  | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H Intel Core i3-N305 ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB SSD | Amazon: $299.99 List Price: 575€ | 1.4 kg | 20.5 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI IPS |
4. 78.1% v7 (old)  | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 MediaTek Kompanio 520 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 3.7 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $162.00 List Price: 319€ | 1.4 kg | 22 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI TN |
5. 81.2%  | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE Intel Core i3-1315U ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $23.95 mCover Case ONLY Compatible ... 2. $35.91 Original New for Lenovo IP F... 3. $70.00 Laptop LCD Top Cover for Len... List Price: 700€ | 1.6 kg | 21 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 |
6. 80.7%  | Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA Intel Core 3 100U ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ⎘ 8 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $22.99 Alapmk Protective Case for S... 2. $7.59 Keyboard Cover for 2024 Sams... 3. $24.99 Fintie Sleeve Case Cover for... | 1.2 kg | 11.8 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
