判决
三星Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA 明确将自己定位为 "高端Chromebook"，给人留下了好坏参半、但整体质量很高的印象。它在许多方面都是同类产品中的杰出代表。
首先，其出色的设计令人印象深刻--时尚、轻巧、平整。出色的 AMOLED 显示屏以其绚丽的色彩和鲜明的对比度给人留下了深刻印象，这绝对是一个加分项。此外，满足日常需求的多种端口选择，以及对于如此纤薄的设备而言令人惊讶的清晰、浑厚的音质，也是Chromebook 的优势所在。
另一方面，有几点也会给人留下不好的印象。电池续航时间可能是一个致命弱点，尤其是当明亮的显示屏和键盘照明需要大量能量时，导致电池耗尽的速度比预期的要快。对于Chromebook 来说，800 欧元左右的价格也是一个真正的挑战，可能会成为许多人的障碍。摄像头呢？遗憾的是，它的性能很差，尤其可能会让 "数字原住民 "感到失望。这几乎让人产生这样的疑问：Android 智能手机的摄像头，无论如何通常都是可用的，难道不是视频通话的更好选择吗？
总而言之，三星Galaxy Chromebook Plus 是一款Chromebook ，适合那些看重出色的显示屏、非常吸引人的轻巧设计，并愿意为此掏更多腰包的用户。如果你能忍受满载情况下电池续航时间的折衷和网络摄像头的平庸，你就会得到一款出色的技术产品。
Pros
Cons
规格
外壳和功能
三星Galaxy Chromebook Plus 非常轻薄，高度仅有 1 厘米多一点，重量约为 1.17 千克，对于一款 15.6 英寸的设备来说是超轻的。不过，由于采用了铝制外壳，它给人的感觉坚固耐用。没有任何吱吱作响的声音，屏幕铰链也运行顺畅。
它安装了一个带照明的 Chiclet 键盘，用于打字。典型的平板设备键程较短，但压力点非常清晰。大型触摸板也很舒适。接口选择合理：一个 USB-A 3.1 Gen1 和两个速度更快的 USB-C 3.1 Gen2。值得一提的还有集成的 microSD 读卡器，不过在测试中证明速度有点慢。无线连接性能良好，具有稳定的 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙功能。
此外，还配备了 210 万像素网络摄像头。 不过，可能由于显示屏边缘非常纤薄，没有为更精细的摄像头模块留出太多空间，其质量只能说一般。内置立体声扬声器也很适合日常使用，音质尚可。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Office (22.4 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 CB 14M868 | |
| Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA | |
可持续性
完全不含塑料的包装为其加分不少。不过，没有关于该产品二氧化碳排放量的信息。虽然风扇易于清洁，但没有升级选项。
显示屏
三星采用了自己的 15.6 英寸 AMOLED 面板，屏幕分辨率为全高清。对于Chromebook 而言，这是一项相当了不起的成就，因为 AMOLED 技术可确保清晰、生动的色彩和完美的黑色带来的出色对比度。一个小缺点是表面反光，这也是许多此类面板的通病。在阳光直射或背后有明亮光源的情况下，这可能会分散注意力。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 416 cd/m²
Contrast: 5748:1 (Black: 0.0722 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.271
| Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 IPS, 1920x1200, 11", 60 Hz | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 CMN 14E5, TN, 1920x1080, 14", Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 CB 14M868 AUO 208D, TN, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | ||||||
| sRGB Coverage | 54.35 | |||||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.54 | |||||
| Response Times | -462% | -589% | -620% | -627% | -507% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.8 ? | 37 ? -1221% | 35 ? -1150% | 37 ? -1221% | 39.3 ? -1304% | 30.8 ? -1000% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18.8 ? | 23 ? -22% | 24 ? -28% | 22.4 ? -19% | 9.4 ? 50% | 21.2 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 | 2000 ? | 24800 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * | 33 | 80 -142% | ||||
| Screen | -90% | -53% | -145% | -170% | -39% | |
| Brightness middle | 415 | 423.1 2% | 306 -26% | 230 -45% | 281 -32% | 344 -17% |
| Brightness | 416 | 397 -5% | 284 -32% | 204 -51% | 259 -38% | 333 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 89 -8% | 85 -12% | 81 -16% | 85 -12% | 94 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.0722 | 0.2845 -294% | 0.1871 -159% | 0.433 -500% | 0.45 -523% | 0.263 -264% |
| Contrast | 5748 | 1487 -74% | 1635 -72% | 531 -91% | 624 -89% | 1308 -77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.84 | 4.76 -24% | 4.88 -27% | 8.91 -132% | 12.4 -223% | 4 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.93 | 11.69 16% | 8.39 40% | 19.81 -42% | 21.9 -57% | 7 50% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 11.7 -333% | 6.3 -133% | 10.3 -281% | 13.2 -389% | 2 26% |
| Gamma | 2.271 97% | 2.186 101% | 2.081 106% | 2.239 98% | 2.174 101% | |
| CCT | 6995 93% | 8417 77% | 7117 91% | 11724 55% | 6757 96% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -276% /
-191% | -321% /
-160% | -383% /
-240% | -399% /
-262% | -273% /
-132% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 33 % Secondary Frequency: 500 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
亮度级别
性能
采用快速 英特尔酷睿 3 100U处理器和 8GB 内存，这款Chromebook 在日常使用中快如离弦之箭。它的性能超越了许多同类产品，即使是要求苛刻的应用程序也能轻松应对--Chrome OS 的性能储备非常充足。
不过，256 GB 内存使用的是速度较慢的 eUFS 技术，在拷贝大文件时可能会出现问题--这与Chromebook 几乎没有关系。集成的英特尔图形处理器也只能算是一般水平：对于日常使用和视频来说足够了，但对于要求苛刻的 3D 游戏来说就不太合适了。不过，Android 游戏在该设备上运行流畅。
| Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA UHD Graphics 64EUs, Core 3 100U | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 Mali-G57 MP3, Kompanio 838, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H UHD Graphics 32EUs, i3-N305, Kingston OM8PGP4128Q-AA | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 Mali-G52 MP2, Kompanio 520, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 CB 14M868 Mali-G52 MP2, Kompanio 520, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE UHD Graphics 64EUs, i3-1315U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6.4 | -67% | -41% | -76% | -6% | ||
| GPU Vulkan | 8436 | 1861 -78% | 5493 -35% | 8753 4% | ||
| Multi-Core | 6620 | 2291 -65% | 4329 -35% | 1538 -77% | 5403 -18% | |
| Single-Core | 2389 | 1003 -58% | 1146 -52% | 633 -74% | 2323 -3% | |
| CrossMark | -62% | -22% | -75% | -74% | 5% | |
| Responsiveness | 1137 | 381 -66% | 1004 -12% | 258 -77% | 268 -76% | 1308 15% |
| Creativity | 1439 | 550 -62% | 1050 -27% | 340 -76% | 350 -76% | 1421 -1% |
| Productivity | 1368 | 554 -60% | 1012 -26% | 393 -71% | 400 -71% | 1389 2% |
| Overall | 1360 | 524 -61% | 1027 -24% | 348 -74% | 357 -74% | 1391 2% |
| PCMark for Android | -62% | -30% | -68% | -64% | -8% | |
| Work 3.0 | 14174 | 10843 -24% | 11631 -18% | 6924 -51% | 6885 -51% | 12986 -8% |
| Storage 2.0 random write int. | 1.65 | 1.21 -27% | 1.59 -4% | 1.09 -34% | 1.37 -17% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. write int. | 208.14 | 76.4 -63% | 292.4 40% | 81.31 -61% | 82.5 -60% | |
| Storage 2.0 random read int. | 206.92 | 4.84 -98% | 43 -79% | 6.6 -97% | 7.5 -96% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. read int. | 3429.91 | 113.16 -97% | 374.61 -89% | 99.17 -97% | 117 -97% | |
| WebXPRT 4 | ||||||
| Overall | 259 | 138 -47% | 194 -25% | 80 -69% | 81 -69% | 243 -6% |
| GFXBench 3.1 | ||||||
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | 101 | 34 -66% | 58 -43% | 15 -85% | 15 -85% | 92 -9% |
| GFXBench | ||||||
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 11 | 3.6 -67% | 6.2 -44% | 1.4 -87% | 1.7 -85% 1.4 -87% | 11 0% |
| GPUScore: Sacred Path | ||||||
| 2560x1440 Official | 13.98 | 2.85 -80% | 5.3 -62% | 9.7 -31% | ||
| GPUScore: The Expedition | ||||||
| 2560x1440 Official | 29.65 | 7.43 -75% | 14.8 -50% | 29.1 -2% | ||
| 3DMark | ||||||
| Wild Life Extreme | 2059 | 514 -75% | 203 -90% | 204 -90% | 1983 -4% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -67% /
-65% | -40% /
-34% | -79% /
-75% | -78% /
-74% | -7% /
-4% |
排放与能源
噪音排放
三星Galaxy Chromebook Plus 在噪音方面有很多优点。在日常使用中，它的工作几乎是无声的。只有在系统达到极限时，例如在苛刻的基准测试中，风扇才会发出声音。即使在这种情况下，风扇的最大噪音值也只有 35 dB（A）左右，非常安静。
因此，Chromebook 在运行过程中始终保持低温。即使在压力测试中，表面温度也只是略有上升。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.8 / 25.8 / 26.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 29.7 / 35.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.8 dB(A) | ||
Fan noise
| Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA UHD Graphics 64EUs, Core 3 100U | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 Mali-G57 MP3, Kompanio 838, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H UHD Graphics 32EUs, i3-N305, Kingston OM8PGP4128Q-AA | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 Mali-G52 MP2, Kompanio 520, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 CB 14M868 Mali-G52 MP2, Kompanio 520, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE UHD Graphics 64EUs, i3-1315U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 14% | -5% | -1% | |||
| off / environment * | 25.8 | 24 7% | 27 -5% | 25.4 2% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 25.8 | 24 7% | 27 -5% | 25.4 2% | ||
| Idle Average * | 25.8 | 24 7% | 27 -5% | 27.2 -5% | ||
| Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 24 9% | 31 -18% | 27.2 -3% | ||
| Load Average * | 29.7 | 24 19% | 31 -4% | 29.5 1% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 35.4 | 24 32% | 32.3 9% | 36.8 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Heat distribution idle and load
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.1 °C / 73.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+4.5 °C / 8.1 F).
| Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA Intel Core 3 100U, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 MediaTek Kompanio 838, ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H Intel Core i3-N305, Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 MediaTek Kompanio 520, ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 CB 14M868 MediaTek Kompanio 520, ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE Intel Core i3-1315U, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 11% | 15% | 12% | -15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39.1 | 38.3 2% | 35.1 10% | 30.4 22% | 32 18% | 40 -2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 38.3 | 38.1 1% | 41.1 -7% | 37.1 3% | 33 14% | 50 -31% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29.1 | 31.5 -8% | 23.5 19% | 21.8 25% | 26 11% | 29.7 -2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.1 | 27.2 3% | 22.6 20% | 25.9 8% | 27 4% | 35 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
Speaker Pink Noise
Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量和电池寿命
Chromebook 通常都很经济，三星Galaxy Chromebook Plus 也不例外。不过，它的一些耗电细节值得注意。键盘背光灯是一个小耗电大户，额外消耗 4 瓦。这几乎相当于整个Chromebook 在闲置和显示屏变暗时的耗电量，约为 4.5 瓦。此外，AMOLED 显示屏的功耗最多可增加 4 瓦。
当然，所有这些都会严重影响电池寿命。在我们的测试中，在调整亮度（150 cd/m²）和不使用键盘背光的情况下，上网冲浪可以持续约 13 个小时。然而，在日常使用中，在打开背光和亮度传感器的情况下，它的续航时间约为 5 小时。这清楚地表明，即使电池容量高达 68 Wh，电池的运行时间也会因启动了哪些舒适功能而有很大的不同，有的可以持续很长时间，有的则会意外地快速耗尽。
| Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.33 Watt |
| Idle | 4.5 / 5.21 / 9.44 Watt |
| Load |
/ 43 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA Core 3 100U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, , AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 Kompanio 838, Mali-G57 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 11" | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H i3-N305, UHD Graphics 32EUs, Kingston OM8PGP4128Q-AA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 Kompanio 520, Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 CB 14M868 Kompanio 520, Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE i3-1315U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, , 1920x1200, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 50% | 39% | 29% | 40% | 3% | -77% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 1.7 62% | 2 56% | 3.03 33% | 2.9 36% | 4.85 -8% | 8.78 ? -95% | 4.63 ? -3% |
| Idle Average * | 5.21 | 4.5 14% | 3 42% | 5.7 -9% | 4.6 12% | 5.35 -3% | 10.4 ? -100% | 7.56 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.44 | 4.9 48% | 6 36% | 7.7 18% | 5.1 46% | 6.7 29% | 14.7 ? -56% | 8.98 ? 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 43 | 9.98 77% | 33 23% | 11.1 74% | 14.1 67% | 45 -5% | 67.6 ? -57% | 62.4 ? -45% |
| Load Average * | 4.37 | 10.9 | 8.7 | 11.3 | 12.5 | 49 ? | 42.3 ? |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption idle, web-surfing, stress test
| Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA Core 3 100U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, 68 Wh | Lenovo Chromebook Duet 11M889 Kompanio 838, Mali-G57 MP3, 29 Wh | Acer Chromebook Plus CB514-4H i3-N305, UHD Graphics 32EUs, 51 Wh | Asus Chromebook CM14 CM1402CM2A-EK0048 Kompanio 520, Mali-G52 MP2, 42 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 CB 14M868 Kompanio 520, Mali-G52 MP2, 46 Wh | Lenovo Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 83EK002GE i3-1315U, UHD Graphics 64EUs, 51 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 779 | 696 -11% | 660 -15% | 725 -7% | 866.6 11% | 555.4 -29% | 669 ? -14% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
作为一款高性能的高端Chromebook ，三星Galaxy Chromebook Plus 给人留下了深刻的印象。
Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Plus XE550XGA
- 05/16/2025 v8
Marc Herter
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
