华硕 ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL 平板电脑简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: 677:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.42
CCT: 6397 K
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA IPS, 2048x1536, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M2 IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Apple iPad Mini 4 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||||||
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 386 | 369 -4% | 347 -10% | 463 20% | 425 10% | 411 6% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 364 | 346 -5% | 348 -4% | 445 22% | 402 10% | 421 16% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 88 | 86 -2% | 88 0% | 92 5% | 91 3% | 91 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.57 | 0.37 35% | 0.47 18% | 0.4 30% | 0.58 -2% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 677 | 997 47% | 985 45% | 1063 57% | 709 5% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 5.58 -69% | 1.67 49% | 6.25 -89% | 4.98 -51% | 2.15 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 6.61 7% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.67 -175% | 1.75 -3% | 6.16 -262% | 5.2 -206% | 2.72 -60% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.43 91% | 2.65 83% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6397 102% | 7927 82% | 6361 102% | 7921 82% | 7249 90% | 7012 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 70 | 95.4 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 86 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 20 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 57 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.08 / 0.31 Watt |
| Idle |  1.01 / 2.71 / 2.75 Watt |
| Load |
7.28 / 10.02 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 18 Wh | Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA 15 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE 15 Wh | Huawei MediaPad M2 18 Wh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 23 Wh | Apple iPad Mini 4 19 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -28% | -38% | -6% | -82% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.01 | 2.5 -148% | 2 -98% | 1.4 -39% | 3.33 -230% | 0.8 21% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.71 | 3.2 -18% | 3.6 -33% | 3.3 -22% | 5.01 -85% | 3.6 -33% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.75 | 3.2 -16% | 4 -45% | 3.4 -24% | 5.19 -89% | 3.9 -42% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 7.28 | 6.3 13% | 8.2 -13% | 5.5 24% | 8.32 -14% | 6.1 16% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.02 | 7.1 29% | 9.9 1% | 7 30% | 9.33 7% | 8 20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 18 Wh | Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA 15 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE 15 Wh | Huawei MediaPad M2 18 Wh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 23 Wh | Apple iPad Mini 4 19 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -25% | 13% | 26% | -10% | 12% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 19.1 | 11.3 -41% | 23.3 22% | 25.8 35% | 24.8 30% | |
| H.264 (h) | 9.6 | 7.5 -22% | 13 35% | 12.1 26% | 10.7 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7.8 | 5.7 -27% | 7.4 -5% | 8.8 13% | 7 -10% | 9 15% |
| Load (h) | 4.4 | 4 -9% | 4.4 0% | 5.7 30% | 4 -9% |
Pros
Cons
华硕设法在新的ZenPad 3 8.0改善了ZenPad S 8.0 原有的一些缺点，包括在持续工作下的降频问题以及低于平均水平的电池续航表现。不幸的是，之前的外观设计被简化了但却没有为外壳的稳定性带来改善，仅仅是处于平均水品。但另一方面，它的制造水平是不会引发任何负面评价的。
测试样机的功能可以和很多更加昂贵的竞争对手相提并论，但缺失了NFC和指纹识别，它们在例如三星Galaxy Tab S2 8.0是可以找到的。摄像头的质量也是令人失望的-我们认为ZenPad S 8.0有着更好的表现。最大的问题在软件，ZenUI在用户界面添加了很多的附加功能，但不幸的是它们有很多的Bug，所以我们在最终评分当中扣去了一份。不过幸运的是华硕依然有机会在接下来几周中通过升级替换合适的应用来解决这个问题。
ZenPad 3 8.0是一台价格相对较低，配备齐全的平板电脑，但它也没有在任何方面创立新的标准。许多小的软件Bug也影响了评测期间的用户体验。
如果你能够放弃LTE功能而且仍然想要一台华硕设备的话，在购买测试型号之前你应该考虑ZenPad S 8.0。后者和我们的测试型号很像但是有着64GB内置存储空间，更好的摄像头和独特的设计，这些都建立在富有竞争力的价格基础上，特别是因为它现在也运行Android 6.0。如果你愿意花更多的钱，那么带有出色AMOLED屏幕的三星 Galaxy Tab S2 8.0相比起测试型号来说会是一个更加吸引人的选择。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
- 10/24/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian
Price comparison
