Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Alldocube Ultra Pad 评测--性能强大、电池容量大、缺点不多的大型Android 平板电脑

功能强大。

Alldocube Ultra Pad 凭借宽敞的 13 英寸显示屏、强大的骁龙 7+ Gen 3 处理器、大容量内存和 15,000 毫安时超大电池在测试中脱颖而出。它是工作、流媒体和日常使用的理想之选。尽管它很笨重,摄像头也不尽如人意,但它仍然物有所值。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

判决

Alldocube Ultra Pad 拥有超大、无闪烁的 13 英寸 16:10 IPS 显示屏,是工作和娱乐的理想之选。Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3处理器,搭配 12GB LPDDR5x 内存和 256GB 存储空间,可提供强大的日常性能。该平板电脑配备了 Wi-Fi 6、带视频输出功能的 USB 3.2、可选 microSD 扩展和手写笔支持,用途非常广泛。最突出的特点是它拥有 15,000 毫安时的大容量电池,在测试中可持续使用 18.5 小时,使用附带的 33 瓦电源适配器可以相对快速地充电。

不过,700 克重的铝制机身给人相当沉重的感觉,锋利的边缘和扭转测试时的轻微嘎吱声让它显得不那么高档。摄像头只能提供一般的效果,扬声器在高频方面有些吃力,但在其他方面还算稳定。尽管Android 15 是当前版本,但不太可能有重大版本升级。总的来说,在同价位的大型平板电脑中,它的性能很强,但并非完美无瑕。

Pros

+ 快速 SoC
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 超大无闪烁 IPS 显示屏
+ 可扩展内存

Cons

- 无生物识别安全选项
- 效率适中
- 最低显示亮度高
- 相当重

价格和供应情况

Alldocube Ultra Pad 的建议零售价约为 460 欧元(约合人民币 535 元),可通过阿里速卖通亚马逊(德国)购买。与键盘和触控笔捆绑销售的价格约为 500 欧元。

译者注:截至发稿时,这款平板电脑尚未在北美上市。不过,对 Alldocube 设备感兴趣的用户稍后可通过以下热门在线零售商查看其供应情况 美国亚马逊 或百思买。

Amazon Logo
$12.98
Oshmirian Screen Protector for ALLDOCUBE Ultra Pad 13inch Tablet – Tempered Glass, 9H Hardness, Anti-Scratch, Bubble-Free, HD Clear, Easy Installation
  • $19.98
    Case for ALLDOCUBE Ultra Pad 13-Inch Tablet,Shockproof PU Leather Cover with Hand Strap, Two-Fold Stand,Compatible with Ultra Pad 13" Android Tablet (Blue)
  • $13.98
    Oshmirian Paper-feel Screen Protector for ALLDOCUBE Ultra Pad – Matte Anti-Glare PET Film, Anti-Fingerprint, Scratch-Resistant, High Touch Sensitivity for Drawing & Note-Taking

Alldocube Ultra Pad 在技术上与其较小的兄弟产品 iPlay 70 mini Ultra Pad 非常相似。 iPlay 70 mini Ultra但它的显示屏更大,电池容量也更大。

这款平板电脑的建议零售价(上市时低于300欧元)有点误导消费者,因为它的售价通常要低得多,这使它成为同类产品中颇具吸引力的替代品。

规格Alldocube Ultra 衬垫

Alldocube Ultra Pad
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 8 x 1.9 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4, A720, A520
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
12.95 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1840 pixel 264 PPI, Capactive Touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 215.05 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Card Reader: microSD up tu 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Hall, Magnetometer, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 291.61 x 191.08
Battery
57.75 Wh, 15000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.85 V, Battery Cycles: 1100
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, AF); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Octa, 33W-Charger, USB-C-Cabel, Alldocube OS 4.1, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus | HDR: not supported | DRM Widevine L1 | IP42 | max. charging speed: 33 W (wired), fanless
Weight
700 g
Price
460 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和功能 - Ultra Pad,铝合金一体成型机身

Alldocube Ultra Pad 拥有近 13 英寸的显示屏,给人留下了深刻的印象,700 克的重量也不算轻。虽然边缘比较锋利,在长时间使用时可能会刺痛手掌,但整体制造质量还是不错的。

结构还不错,但内部在扭动时会发出明显的吱吱嘎嘎声。用力按压屏幕会导致轻微的波纹,不过在正常使用时不会出现这种情况。从外观上看,Ultra Pad 的屏占比高达 88%,给人留下了深刻印象。

Alldocube 配备了 256 GB 的大容量存储空间,可使用 microSD 卡进行扩展。USB 3.2 端口传输速度快,支持有线视频输出。

该产品不具备卫星定位、振动电机、NFC 和生物识别安全等功能。

尺寸比较

310 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 720 g300.6 mm 194.7 mm 6 mm 664 g293.88 mm 201.38 mm 5.79 mm 595 g291.61 mm 191.08 mm 7.6 mm 700 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620) (Angelbird V60)
37.6 MB/s +101%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 57.4, n=58, last 2 years)
36.2 MB/s +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.76 MB/s +33%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.68 MB/s

通信和操作 - 配备 Wi-Fi 6 的大型平板电脑

Alldocube Ultra Pad 没有蜂窝版本。不过,通过 Wi-Fi 6,它可以提供快速的无线性能,不过我们的参考路由器(华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000)的连接速度可能会更高一些。

触摸输入快速而准确,屏幕表面的滑动性也不错。这款平板电脑还支持 Alldocube 的专用触控笔,但必须单独购买。手写笔在书写时感觉有点硬,功能有限,但总体性能可靠。

Networking
Alldocube Ultra Pad
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
922 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
686 (min: 586) MBit/s ∼70%
Teclast T65
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
282 (min: 48) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
347 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼36%
Honor MagicPad 3
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
721 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
974 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
780 (min: 711) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 431) MBit/s ∼85%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
825 (min: 295) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
822 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
567 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
631 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼65%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Alldocube Ultra Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø906 (474-961)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø780 (711-806)
Alldocube Ultra Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø685 (586-763)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (431-879)

软件和可持续性 - Alldocube 承诺 5 年更新一次

Alldocube Ultra Pad 在谷歌Android 15 上运行,采用该公司自己的 Alldocube OS 4.1 界面,其中包括 Magic Cube AI。该助手只提供一些基本功能,如人工智能翻译。在测试时,安全补丁是最新的,日期为 2025 年 9 月 5 日。预计这款平板电脑在欧盟将接受长达 5 年的更新,不过不太可能有重大的Android 版本升级。

Alldocube 没有提供有关可持续发展的详细信息,而且该设备不是为用户维修而设计的。外包装也含有大量塑料。

相机 - Ultra Pad 质量一般

与 Ultra Pad 自拍
与 Ultra Pad 自拍

Alldocube Ultra Pad 的前后摄像头成像质量一般。前置摄像头拍摄的图像有些柔和、浑浊,而主摄像头拍摄的图像缺乏对比度,偶尔会出现明显的噪点。

前置摄像头以 30 FPS 的全高清格式录制视频,质量一般,而主摄像头支持超高清(30 FPS),效果明显更好。在平板电脑附近捕捉到的音频清晰,背景噪音小。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HaseSee5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
4.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
14 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Alldocube Ultra Pad: 6.91 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 13.96 ∆E

显示屏 - Alldocube Ultra Pad 上的无闪烁 IPS 显示屏

Alldocube Ultra Pad 配备了一块 12.95 英寸(32.89 厘米)IPS 显示屏,宽高比为 16:10,在娱乐和工作效率之间取得了良好的平衡。亮度水平相当不错,尤其适合室内使用。虽然黑度略有提升,但对比度依然清晰,令人满意。有无环境光传感器的最大亮度相同,但最低亮度异常高。

好的一面是,在示波器下显示屏完全没有闪烁。

484
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 552 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 514 cd/m² Minimum: 19.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 552 cd/m²
Contrast: 824:1 (Black: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.34
CCT: 7614 K
Alldocube Ultra Pad
IPS, 2880x1840, 13"
Teclast T65
IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"
Honor MagicPad 3
LCD, 3200x2136, 13.3"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
TFT-LCD, 2880x1800, 13.1"
Screen
-20%
2%
45%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
552
379
-31%
753
36%
779
41%
Brightness (cd/m²)
514
357
-31%
706
37%
751
46%
Brightness Distribution (%)
87
91
5%
86
-1%
90
3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.67
0.28
58%
1.23
-84%
0.43
36%
Contrast (:1)
824
1354
64%
612
-26%
1812
120%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.3
6.01
-82%
2.3
30%
1.9
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.7
13.04
-95%
5.9
12%
5
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
7
-46%
4.2
12%
2.7
44%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.253 98%
2.27 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
7614 85%
7361 88%
7391 88%
6923 94%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
748 cd/m² +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
585 cd/m² +5%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
555 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
753 cd/m² +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
581 cd/m² +5%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
553 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8163 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

改变!

图像显示细节:黑电平/对比度 - 基于计算值和主观判断(暗色图像/电影序列中的浓黑、图像清晰度?


灰度(色温:最高暖色,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
灰度(色温:最高暖色,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩(色温:最高暖色,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩(色温:最高暖色,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色温:最高暖色,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色温:最高暖色,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.314 ms rise
↘ 9.904 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.668 ms rise
↘ 19.86 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
在阴天的户外
室外
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 配备骁龙 7+Gen 3 的 Ultra Pad

Alldocube Ultra Pad 配备了 骁龙 7+ Gen 3和 12GB LPDDR5x 内存,图形处理器为 Adreno 732.系统整体性能稳定,在运行要求苛刻的游戏时仅出现轻微减速。

在压力测试中,SoC 的性能基本保持稳定。表面温度偶尔会超过 40°C,即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持在安全范围内。

扬声器提供了不错的音效,但清晰度稍有欠缺。

Ultra Pad 配备了 15,000 毫安时的大容量电池,在我们的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中实现了 18.5 小时的超长续航时间。不过,如果效率更高,续航时间可能会更长。使用随机附带的 33 瓦电源适配器,平板电脑在 131 分钟内完全充满电(60 分钟内充满 50%,98 分钟内充满 80%)。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2216 Points +18%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1880 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1168 - 1893, n=4)
1702 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 4128, n=101, last 2 years)
1431 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1368 Points -27%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
462 Points -75%
Multi-Core
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6749 Points +33%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
5067 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (3865 - 5089, n=4)
4712 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 16544, n=101, last 2 years)
4592 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
3921 Points -23%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1521 Points -70%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
19364 Points +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (11279 - 11654, n=4)
11472 Points 0%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
11443 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (368 - 32525, n=92, last 2 years)
7277 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
4975 Points -57%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
564 Points -95%
Wild Life Extreme
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5192 Points +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (2937 - 3098, n=3)
2994 Points +2%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
2947 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 9391, n=95, last 2 years)
2350 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1422 Points -52%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
156 Points -95%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5178 Points +74%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
2981 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (2844 - 3107, n=3)
2977 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (99 - 11105, n=94, last 2 years)
2513 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1404 Points -53%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
154 Points -95%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
60 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (47 - 72, n=4)
58.3 fps +8%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
54 fps
Average of class Tablet
  (4.8 - 122, n=99, last 2 years)
38.5 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
24 fps -56%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
6.6 fps -88%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
203 fps +46%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
139 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (130 - 139, n=4)
134.5 fps -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (4.2 - 340, n=99, last 2 years)
93.2 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
56 fps -60%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
7.4 fps -95%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
45 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (29 - 60, n=4)
42.5 fps +21%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
35 fps
Average of class Tablet
  (2.9 - 106.4, n=99, last 2 years)
27.6 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
15 fps -57%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
4.2 fps -88%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
83 fps +60%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
52 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (49 - 53, n=4)
51 fps -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (1.5 - 125, n=99, last 2 years)
35.6 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
23 fps -56%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2.7 fps -95%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
37 fps +61%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
23 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (22 - 23, n=4)
22.8 fps -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (0.64 - 55.1, n=99, last 2 years)
16.3 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
9.9 fps -57%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1.2 fps -95%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 5295, n=25, last 2 years)
727 Points +76%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
498 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (413 - 439, n=2)
426 Points +3%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
413 Points
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
166 Points -60%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 41155, n=25, last 2 years)
3774 Points +812%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
493 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (414 - 442, n=2)
428 Points +3%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
414 Points
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
194 Points -53%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57388, n=25, last 2 years)
5378 Points +464%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1127 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (954 - 1019, n=2)
987 Points +3%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
954 Points
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
206 Points -78%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
259.582 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (119.9 - 260, n=4)
202 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet
  (22.3 - 395, n=71, last 2 years)
146.1 Points -44%
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
72.031 Points -72%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1489057 Points +11%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1344908 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1095324 - 1408366, n=3)
1282866 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 3475590, n=73, last 2 years)
1143367 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
Points -100%
Alldocube Ultra PadTeclast T65Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-60%
-46%
-31%
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3497.29
983
-72%
1686.77
-52%
1757 ?(950 - 3497, n=114)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
2674.36
574
-79%
999.78
-63%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
311.12
173
-44%
228.91
-26%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
360.44
203
-44%
211.53
-41%
Max. Load
 42.4 °C42.6 °C40.7 °C 
 36.8 °C40.1 °C35.5 °C 
 37.1 °C37.8 °C36.8 °C 
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
38.8 °C43 °C41.8 °C
34.7 °C40.1 °C37.2 °C
33.9 °C36.9 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94.1 % +1%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92.8 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 %
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.1 %
Teclast T65
Mali-G57 MP1, T7280 (T620), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.5 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.4 %
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76.8 % -22%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.3 (8.2-8.38)
Alldocube Ultra Pad Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø59.8 (58-62.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.6 (26.3-27.9)
Alldocube Ultra Pad Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø7.08 (7.01-7.13)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.938.22524.335.83120.740.34018.134.15030.839.56321.733.48014.827.410017.238.112514.35316017.163.420014.360.225014.262.831514.562.24001360.150011.870.163013.271.680010.972.5100011.772.3125011.476.7160011.775.5200012.376.725001378.1315012.871.6400012.465.7500013.969.5630013.575.180001367.61000013.669.41250013.771.4160001367.2SPL24.885.8N0.666.6median 13median 69.5Delta1.24.640.833.230.129.426.726.127.826.635.933.228.326.428.834.227.344.617.249.616.35914.759.612.860.413.263.312.663.512.367.712.271.512.172.712.37512.376.312.177.41275.212.274.71376.413.176.313.174.513.568.313.467.813.465.313.554.713.352.12586.40.667.6median 13.1median 67.81.77.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAlldocube Ultra PadSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alldocube Ultra Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)
18h 28min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Alldocube Ultra Pad
15000 mAh
18.5 h
Teclast T65
8000 mAh
13.7 h
Honor MagicPad 3
12450 mAh
22.6 h
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
10090 mAh
18.9 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

测试中:Alldocube Ultra Pad。
测试中:Alldocube Ultra Pad。

Alldocube Ultra Pad 的 13 英寸无闪烁大显示屏、强劲的性能、充足的内存和出色的电池续航能力给人留下了深刻印象。Wi-Fi 6 和 USB 3.2 提供了可靠的连接性。不过,它在重量、摄像头和可持续性方面的弱点也很明显。总的来说,这是一款功能强大但尚未完全完善的Android 平板电脑。

Alldocube Ultra Pad - 10/28/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
50 / 69 → 73%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 83%
Battery
91%
Display
76%
Games Performance
44 / 65 → 68%
Application Performance
79 / 92 → 86%
AI Performance
28%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
86 / 91 → 95%
Camera
49 / 90 → 54%
Average
59%
83%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
94.2%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
39.2%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 33.1%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
82.9%
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Alldocube Ultra Pad
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.98
Oshmirian Screen Protector f...
2. $19.98
Case for ALLDOCUBE Ultra Pad...
3. $13.98
Oshmirian Paper-feel Screen ...
List Price: 460€
700 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.95"
2880x1840
264 PPI
IPS
2.
74%
Teclast T65
Teclast T65
UNISOC T7280 (T620) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $189.99
List Price: 270€
720 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash13.40"
1920x1200
169 PPI
IPS
3.
85.9%
Honor MagicPad 3
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $31.82
Magnetic PU Leather Flip Tab...
2. $33.99
Magnetic Detachable Wireless...
3. $99.99
JZCZMCE Keyboard Case for Ho...
List Price: 700€
595 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.30"
3200x2136
289 PPI
LCD
4.
81.8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $429.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 12...
2. $549.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 1...
3. $469.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 25...
List Price: 789€
664 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.10"
2880x1800
259 PPI
TFT-LCD

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Alldocube Ultra Pad 评测--性能强大、电池容量大、缺点不多的大型Android 平板电脑
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-10-29 (Update: 2025-10-29)