评语：不只是游戏玩家的平板电脑
Alldocube iPlay 70 mini Ultra证明，性能强劲、运行时间长的产品不一定非得是旗舰平板电脑。虽然它无法与真正的高端产品相媲美，但其骁龙 SoC 处理器足以轻松应对大多数游戏。LTPS 面板在亮度、对比度和无闪烁操作方面给人留下了深刻印象，只是其微弱的校准功能使原本清晰的显示体验变得黯淡无光。
该平板电脑不仅提供宽敞、快速的内部存储空间，还支持通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。由于采用了 USB 3.2 接口，数据传输同样迅速。
不足之处是，在持续负载的情况下，设备会明显发热。此外，它还缺乏指纹识别、面部识别和 GNSS 支持。尽管扬声器采用了 DTS 品牌，但无法提供令人信服的音效。尽管如此，考虑到它的价格，iPlay 70 mini Ultra 总体上证明是一款非常可靠的平板电脑。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Alldocube iPlay 70 mini Ultra 的官方标价为 400 欧元（约合 435 美元），但在亚马逊上的售价一般略低于 300 欧元（约合 325 美元）。如果打折，价格有时会进一步降至约 269 欧元（约合 290 美元）。
- $209.99ALLDOCUBE iPlay 70 mini Pro 8.4 inch Android 15 Tablet, MediaTek Dimensity MT8791 Tab, 90Hz Reflex, 16GB+256GB (1 TB), 1920x1200 FHD, Widevine L1 6050mAh, WiFi6 BT5.4, 5MP/13MP, 4G LTE, 6 Axis Gyro
- $89.99ALLDOCUBE Android 15 Tablet, 8.7" iPlay 60 Mini Tab, 90Hz Reflex, 400Nits, Octa-Core CPU, Widewine L1, Dual Speakers, 4000mAh, 4G LTE+2.4G/5G WiFi+BT 5.0, GPS, 800×1340HD, 12GB+64GB(512GB TF)
Alldocube iPlay 70 mini Ultra 的名字有点啰嗦，但它却是一款配备 8.8 英寸显示屏的小巧平板电脑。性能由 骁龙 7+ Gen 3的骁龙 7+ Gen 3 处理器，并辅以大容量内存配置。这款平板电脑的原价为 400 欧元（约合 435 美元），现在的售价约为 300 欧元（约合 325 美元）。
规格 - Alldocube iPlay 70 mini Ultra
外壳和功能 - 铝制一体成型平板电脑
iPlay 70 mini Ultra 仅提供深灰色版本，采用纤薄的一体式机身设计，仅重 335 克。其 83% 的屏占比非常吸引人，制造质量和材料都给人留下了坚实的印象。不过，由于采用了低温多晶硅（LTPS）技术，对显示屏施加强大的压力会产生明显的波纹效应。
除了 12GB 内存和 256GB 内部存储空间外，Alldocube 平板电脑还支持通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。USB 3.2（Gen.1）端口可提供快速数据传输，并允许有线视频输出。附带的 ERM 振动电机感觉很强劲，但有些松软。不提供生物识别验证方法。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 58.4, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Angelbird V60) | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
软件和可持续性 - iPlay 70 mini Ultra 预装Android 14
Alldocube iPlay 70 mini Ultra 配备了谷歌Android 14，并使用了制造商的 Alldocube OS 3.0L 界面。该公司没有提供有关软件更新支持的信息，尽管能源标签上标明支持五年更新。显示为五年。这是否包括Android 的重大升级似乎不太可能。在测试时，安全补丁的日期是 2025 年 6 月 5 日，这是合理的最新日期。
Alldocube 没有提供任何有关可持续发展的详细信息，也没有提供备件或维修指南。不过，包装在很大程度上避免了塑料的使用。
摄像头--不是 Alldocube 平板电脑的核心优势
iPlay 70 mini Ultra 的前置摄像头只适合基本的视频通话，既不能提供高细节，也不能提供强大的弱光性能。它可以录制 30 FPS 的全高清视频。
后置主摄像头也是如此。在光线充足的条件下，它足以满足拍摄文件的需要，但却无法拍摄出有吸引力的照片。在弱光环境下，图像噪点明显。积极的一面是，它支持最高 30 FPS 的超高清视频录制。
相机应用本身只能提供有限的设置，而且一些菜单翻译执行得很差。
显示屏 - iPlay 70 mini Ultra，采用无闪烁 LTPS 显示屏
Alldocube 平板电脑配备了 8.8 英寸 LTPS 面板，图像清晰、生动。虽然亮度不是特别高，但在室内绰绰有余，在室外阴暗处也能正常使用。黑阶略有提升，但平板电脑仍能实现清晰的对比度。另一方面，最低亮度还可以再低一些。
精确的色彩还原并不是该设备的强项。即使在 "自然 "模式下，图像也显得偏冷，色彩饱和度过高。不过，在日常使用中，这通常不会成为主要缺点。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 555 cd/m²
Contrast: 1207:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 9.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
CCT: 9616 K
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra LTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7" | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU LTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches IPS, 1340x800, 8.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 10% | 22% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle | 555 | 486 -12% | 441 -21% | 499 -10% |
| Brightness | 523 | 462 -12% | 420 -20% | 479 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 91 3% | 90 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.35 24% | 0.5 -9% | 0.37 20% |
| Contrast | 1207 | 1389 15% | 882 -27% | 1349 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 6.2 3% | 1.08 83% | 3.68 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.6 | 10.4 17% | 2.52 80% | 6.82 46% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.1 | 5.7 37% | 1.1 88% | 1.9 79% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.12 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.184 101% |
| CCT | 9616 68% | 7911 82% | 6655 98% | 6787 96% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra | |
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8316 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.305 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.253 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.145 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.52 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). | ||
Alldocube iPlay 70 mini Ultra 的进一步测量结果
| Networking | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -65% | 45% | -84% | -28% | -39% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1996.56 | 916.45 -54% | 3984.3 100% | 289 -86% | 1733 ? -13% | 1516 ? -24% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1866.05 | 398.32 -79% | 3483.56 87% | 263.6 -86% | 1166 ? -38% | 1108 ? -41% |
| Random Read 4KB | 392.27 | 182.74 -53% | 355.12 -9% | 71.1 -82% | 286 ? -27% | 227 ? -42% |
| Random Write 4KB | 474.41 | 128.92 -73% | 483.73 2% | 82.7 -83% | 314 ? -34% | 243 ? -49% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Alldocube iPlay 70 mini Ultra是一款小巧的平板电脑，其性能、电池续航时间和显示质量都非常出色。以其适中的市场价格，很难找到比它技术能力更强的对手。
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
- 08/13/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84%  | Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $359.99 ALLDOCUBE iPlay 70 mini Ultr... 2. $209.99 ALLDOCUBE iPlay 70 mini Pro ... 3. $89.99 ALLDOCUBE Android 15 Tablet,... List Price: 400€ | 335 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI LTPS |
2. 84.1% v7 (old)  | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $112.78 List Price: 179€ | 332 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 8.70" 1340x800 179 PPI LCD TFT |
3. 86.5%  | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 Callyue Case for Lenovo Legi... 2. $12.99 Bkinew Clear Case for 2025 L... 3. $11.49 elitegadget Case for Lenovo ... List Price: 599€ | 350 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI LTPS |
4. 76.8%  | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | List Price: 150€ | 373 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 8.70" 1340x800 179 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
