Notebookcheck

Oppo A74 5G评测--经济实惠的5G智能手机,续航时间长

不仅仅是5G。 与名字所暗示的相反,Oppo A74 5G不仅仅是同名LTE机型的简单5G升级。除其他事项外,相机和显示屏也得到了优化。在我们的评论中,我们会发现一切是否有了更好的变化。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Oppo A74 5G (A Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Capacitive, LTPS, Panda-Glass MN338, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 162.9 x 74.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, 26 mm, 1/2.0", 0.8 µm) + 8 MPix (Ultrawide, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4) + 2 MPix (Depth, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0, 26 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, 18W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Headset, SIM-Needle, Bumper, ColorOS 11.1, 24 Months Warranty, Body-SAR: 1.29 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0922 W/kg; Single-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
190 g, Power Supply: 103 g
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
ratingversion
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %7
08/2021
Oppo A74 5G
SD 480, Adreno 619
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %7
08/2021
Vivo Y72 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.58"2408x1080
80 %7
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79 %7
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720

案例、设备和操作

Oppo A74 5G大部分由塑料制成,只有正面有熊猫玻璃保护。尽管如此,其制造质量还是给人留下了良好的印象,其特点是缝隙干净,手感舒适。然而,音量按钮却异常狭窄。

A74 5G的设备处于一个吸引人的水平。NFC已经到位,Oppo的智能手机也支持全面的双SIM卡。存储空间也可以通过microSD卡扩展,但不支持exFAT文件系统。

Wi-Fi 5是一个合适的Wi-Fi标准,与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12相结合,可以实现稳定的传输速率。A74 5G在移动中显示出普通的连接特性,并提供广泛的频率覆盖。

谷歌的Android 11与ColorOS 11.1被用作操作系统,这是该制造商的其他智能手机的老熟人。在测试时,安全更新是在2021年3月5日更新的,因此不再是最新的。A74 5G应该在三年内每季度更新一次。

OPPO A74 5G支持VoLTE以及Wi-Fi通话,拿在耳边时有良好的语音质量。扬声器回声明显,麦克风范围也只是一般。噪声抑制效果很好,但巨大的噪声会导致很窄的频率响应,这使得扬声器听起来非常不自然和空洞。

触摸屏提供了保护膜,具有良好的滑行性能。通过触摸敏感的表面快速而准确地实现了输入,较高的刷新率也使在系统中的导航变得令人愉快的流畅。电源键上的指纹扫描仪和二维面部识别可用于生物识别安全。两者的工作都相当可靠,并且有一个吸引人的解锁速度。

Size comparison

164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g164 mm 75.3 mm 8.5 mm 193 g162.9 mm 74.7 mm 8.4 mm 190 g161.81 mm 75.34 mm 8.92 mm 190 g
Cross Platform Disk Test
Sequential read
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (65.2min, 83.408P1 - 91.9max) MB/s ∼100% +1%
Oppo A74 5G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.8 (20.7min, 48.543P1 - 94.8max) MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35.4 - 88.4, n=45, last 2 years)
71.8 MB/s ∼85% -14%
Vivo Y72 5G
 
40.6 (32min, 33.982P1 - 44.6max) MB/s ∼48% -52%
Sequential write
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
41.7 (34.2min, 34.962P1 - 50.7max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
Oppo A74 5G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
39.7 (25.2min, 30.678P1 - 50.3max) MB/s ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12.3 - 52.3, n=45, last 2 years)
33.4 MB/s ∼80% -16%
Vivo Y72 5G
 
15.4 (11.2min, 11.335P1 - 24.2max) MB/s ∼37% -61%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859050.350.346.248.247.743.848.840.340.437.940.440.242.9384242.738.139.341.242.639.730.340.241.434.441.325.231.738.838.939.738.340.641.139.737.139.535.842.83341.143.842.537.140.24139.83638.138.536.840.941.840.339.44238.636.838.140.639.341.844.143.136.939.541.235.938.240.242.941.53839.739.738.738.241.139.237.237.534.736.843.13940.343.340.437.634.539.437.538.639.2394137.33839.733.134.841.941.838.436.841.243.941.339.333.939.93943.240.141.538.43544.634.535.440.74142.537.341.437.8423850.350.346.248.247.743.848.840.340.437.940.440.242.9384242.738.139.341.242.639.730.340.241.434.441.325.231.738.838.939.738.340.641.139.737.139.535.842.83341.143.842.537.140.24139.83638.138.536.840.941.840.339.44238.636.838.140.639.341.844.143.136.939.541.235.938.240.242.941.53839.739.738.738.241.139.237.237.534.736.843.13940.343.340.437.634.539.437.538.639.2394137.33839.733.134.841.941.838.436.841.243.941.339.333.939.93943.240.141.538.43544.634.535.440.74142.537.341.437.8423820.748.384.287.675.387.688.184.880.284.685.381.683.272.380.178.989.885.389.287.687.572.994.887.370.478.286.883.786.259.859.476.884.486.78986.28585.290.187.887.886.587.887.188.384.68790.287.577.791.188.687.686.784.987.186.280.983.38686.389.487.885.384.788.588.785.183.78683.861.885.18888.284.5868686.587.786.685.787.385.784.187.886.486.187.187.687.488.786.885.588.28285.686.784.986.186.986.189.98488.885.688.387.866.484.584.389.187.788.886.986.987.888.187.687.687.483.749.290.586.477.285.279.8Tooltip
; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø39.7 (25.2-50.3)
; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø83.8 (20.7-94.8)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Vivo Y72 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (333min - 351max) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Oppo A74 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
311 (151min - 363max) MBit/s ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
294 (286min - 301max) MBit/s ∼85% -5%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
350 (332min - 359max) MBit/s ∼96% +12%
Vivo Y72 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
343 (314min - 350max) MBit/s ∼94% +10%
Oppo A74 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
312 (188min - 339max) MBit/s ∼85%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360334333326327333333329324333326338305321326333337323322332328311323209188195253322322326339351373347371357364373359362364372359358371354370359360360367349373358361374361364374363360334333326327333333329324333326338305321326333337323322332328311323209188195253322322326339351373347371357364373359362364372359358371354370359360360367349373358361374361364374363360151313316299314301305305309307305310308315303265363316308324314315316321314318313319314310331358351347347345340353348349344349342342348351338360324350350337349351345347348346348344Tooltip
Oppo A74 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (188-339)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, ARM Mali-G57 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (347-374)
Oppo A74 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø306 (151-363)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, ARM Mali-G57 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (324-360)

相机 - Oppo A74 5G的额外超广角

与Oppo A74 5G自拍
与Oppo A74 5G自拍

在规格表上,背面的相机设置与Oppo的A74非常相似,但它得到了一个额外的超广角,其细节有点低,向边缘模糊,但总体上有一个体面的成像性能。我们喜欢主摄像头在黑暗中的照片,变焦的效果比4G机型好一点。

OPPO再次依靠相同的1600万像素型号的前置摄像头。视频可以用全高清录制,两边最好都是每秒30帧。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
20 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A74 5G: 10.12 ∆E min: 2.44 - max: 20.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
75.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A74 5G: 45.64 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 88.46 ∆E

显示屏 - Oppo智能手机采用LTPS面板和PWM技术

子像素结构
子像素结构
调整色温
调整色温

Oppo A74 5G的6.5英寸LTPS显示屏具有全高清+分辨率,工作频率为90赫兹。不支持HDR。亮度相当好,由于黑值较低,该智能手机提供了一个强大的对比度。

在出厂设置中,显示屏相当冷,但可以通过设置进行调整。如果你相应地提高色温,你将得到自然的色彩再现,而不必在色彩空间支持上做出妥协。

尽管是LCD,Oppo使用PWM进行亮度控制。其频率相当高,所以应该很少有用户会遇到问题。

567
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 594 cd/m² Average: 572.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.21 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 582 cd/m²
Contrast: 1663:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Oppo A74 5G
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Vivo Y72 5G
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.58
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
-10%
-38%
-101%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.6 (18.8, 20.8)
42 (19, 23)
-6%
43.6 (21.2, 22.4)
-10%
66.8 (32, 34.8)
-69%
Response Time Black / White *
17.6 (6.8, 10.8)
20 (9, 11)
-14%
29.2 (14.4, 14.8)
-66%
40.8 (19.2, 21.6)
-132%
PWM Frequency
2404 (14)
Screen
-52%
-4%
-87%
Brightness middle
582
419
-28%
550
-5%
543
-7%
Brightness
573
384
-33%
515
-10%
512
-11%
Brightness Distribution
94
87
-7%
86
-9%
85
-10%
Black Level *
0.35
0.7
-100%
0.32
9%
0.63
-80%
Contrast
1663
599
-64%
1719
3%
862
-48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.32
-84%
1.8
-0%
4.9
-172%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.4
5.06
-49%
3.1
9%
8.6
-153%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
3
-50%
2.5
-25%
6.3
-215%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.203 100%
2.28 96%
2.23 99%
CCT
6736 96%
7236 90%
6326 103%
8120 80%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-31% / -44%
-21% / -10%
-94% / -90%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 14 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15345 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

灰度(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
灰度(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩表现(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩表现(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(调整白平衡,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
在户外
在户外
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

Oppo A74 5G采用的是入门级SoC 高通骁龙480 5G并可使用6GB的工作内存。该系统提供了良好的性能,甚至比去年600系列的小机型还要快。游戏可以顺利运行,但在要求较高的游戏中,细节必须减少。我们无法确定在任何时候都会出现过度加热。

下巴一侧的扬声器表现平平,具有金属特性,随着音量的增加而变形。然而,对于日常生活中的偶尔使用,它是足够的。另外,还有一个不错的音频插孔(信噪比:73.63 dBFS)或蓝牙。

A74 5G在电池运行时间方面可以带来积极的惊喜,因为它比 4G型号并经常提供比竞争对手更好的结果。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
520 Points ∼90%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
565 Points ∼98% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
547 Points ∼95% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼82% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (504 - 520, n=6)
511 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=245, last 2 years)
578 Points ∼100% +11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1713 Points ∼87%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1772 Points ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1692 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1627 - 1713, n=6)
1671 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=245, last 2 years)
1980 Points ∼100% +16%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7016 Points ∼70%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6783 Points ∼68% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8965 Points ∼90% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6928 - 8402, n=5)
7557 Points ∼76% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=60, last 2 years)
9953 Points ∼100% +42%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6368 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8504 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points ∼72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6380 - 7713, n=2)
7047 Points ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=260, last 2 years)
7923 Points ∼93%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3625 Points ∼88%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3516 Points ∼85% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3553 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼90% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3602 - 3656, n=6)
3636 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
4136 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3825 Points ∼73%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3612 Points ∼69% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3664 Points ∼70% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3817 - 3845, n=6)
3835 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5238 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3064 Points ∼95%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3216 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3214 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼94% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3008 - 3118, n=6)
3076 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2982 Points ∼93% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2420 Points ∼92%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2419 Points ∼92% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2453 Points ∼93% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼98% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2419 - 2478, n=6)
2436 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)
2640 Points ∼100% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2287 Points ∼82%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2222 Points ∼80% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2302 Points ∼82% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼90% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2287 - 2338, n=6)
2302 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)
2791 Points ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3037 Points ∼87%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3508 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3184 Points ∼91% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼79% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3017 - 3136, n=6)
3059 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)
2819 Points ∼80% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2563 Points ∼76%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2476 Points ∼74% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2497 Points ∼74% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼79% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2536 - 2566, n=6)
2559 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3358 Points ∼100% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2448 Points ∼65%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2308 Points ∼61% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2327 Points ∼61% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼68% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2440 - 2448, n=6)
2445 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3792 Points ∼100% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3068 Points ∼91%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3325 Points ∼99% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3355 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼86% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2941 - 3098, n=6)
3060 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3027 Points ∼90% -1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
980 Points ∼35%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1102 Points ∼39% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼44% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (980 - 986, n=6)
981 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=104, last 2 years)
2836 Points ∼100% +189%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
969 Points ∼33%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1083 Points ∼37% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼41% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (969 - 978, n=6)
974 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 8672, n=100, last 2 years)
2948 Points ∼100% +204%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
99.7 (977min - 980max) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
98.9 (1240min - 1254max) % ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (99.4 - 99.8, n=6)
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (26.6 - 99.8, n=93, last 2 years)
89.9 % ∼90% -10%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
292 Points ∼33%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
321 Points ∼36% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (290 - 294, n=5)
292 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=52, last 2 years)
895 Points ∼100% +207%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
285 Points ∼32%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
312 Points ∼35% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (284 - 287, n=5)
285 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=50, last 2 years)
900 Points ∼100% +216%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
98.6 (289min - 293max) % ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (98.6 - 99.5, n=5)
99 % ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.6 - 100, n=46, last 2 years)
90.9 % ∼92% -8%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼53%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps ∼43% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼47% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 30, n=6)
18.3 fps ∼61% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=282, last 2 years)
22.9 fps ∼76% +43%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼72%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼57% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼57% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼64% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (17 - 19, n=6)
18 fps ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=281, last 2 years)
26.4 fps ∼100% +39%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10 fps ∼59%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.4 fps ∼49% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps ∼52% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼100% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (9.9 - 19, n=6)
11.5 fps ∼68% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=282, last 2 years)
15.1 fps ∼89% +51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.7 fps ∼65%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps ∼54% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼53% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼60% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6.4 - 6.7, n=6)
6.55 fps ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=282, last 2 years)
10.3 fps ∼100% +54%
Oppo A74 5GVivo Y72 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
15%
45%
44%
13%
22%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.58
955.6
94%
939.22
91%
858.19
74%
765 (427 - 999, n=86)
55%
780 (41.9 - 2037, n=290, last 2 years)
58%
Sequential Write 256KB
265.25
13.6
-95%
398.05
50%
381.69
44%
256 (13.6 - 511, n=86)
-3%
345 (11.9 - 1321, n=290, last 2 years)
30%
Random Read 4KB
153.19
164.4
7%
151.55
-1%
174.64
14%
146 (92.6 - 239, n=86)
-5%
139 (13.5 - 325, n=290, last 2 years)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
115.79
179.4
55%
162.76
41%
167.15
44%
120 (18.2 - 290, n=86)
4%
125 (5.2 - 330, n=290, last 2 years)
8%

温度

Max. Load
 36.6 °C36.3 °C36.8 °C 
 36.7 °C36.7 °C36.4 °C 
 35.9 °C36.7 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
33.6 °C35.4 °C35.5 °C
33.7 °C35.1 °C36.3 °C
33.3 °C35 °C36 °C
Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.


演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.442.42527.535.63121.1344023.930.75033.238.36320.337.38021.635.910025.53612517.735.516018.240.920015.546.925015.351.431517.657.940015.762.650016.668.263014.969.880015.269.710001675.2125015.280.9160015.383.5200014.782.1250015.180.5315015.773.3400014.770.9500014.878.3630014.875.5800015.477.71000014.575.11250014.572.11600013.858.1SPL27.490.4N0.978.5median 15.3median 70.9Delta1.19.535.944.92942.825.144.231.445.142.446.132.448.52647.821.547.41549.121.350.914.453.81457.513.559.511.964.312.265.512.666.513.471.712.275.712.37812.779.913.580.9138312.885.113.782.313.583.613.881.714.783.313.680.214.2731571.125.793.20.795median 13.5median 73110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo A74 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo A74 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Oppo A74 5G
5000 mAh
Vivo Y72 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
1223
1084
-11%
1113
-9%
1235
1%
899 (425 - 2000, n=295, last 2 years)
-26%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 91)
20h 23min

Pros

+ 90赫兹显示
+ 完整的双卡双待
+ 充足的内存

Cons

- 平庸的扬声器
- 没有对microSD的exFAT支持
- PWM

结论 - Oppo A74 5G并非一切都好

在审查中。Oppo A74 5G。测试设备由Oppo德国提供。
在审查中。Oppo A74 5G。测试设备由Oppo德国提供。

Oppo A74 5G在一些方面比 A74 LTE并依靠90赫兹的LCD,而不是60赫兹的OLED,以及其他一些东西。然而,Oppo通过使用PWM,使LC技术的一个优势没有得到发挥。SoC是更新的,这不仅意味着更高的性能,也意味着更好的效率,这反映在明显更长的电池运行时间。此外,5G版本也有一个NFC芯片。相机也被补充了一个超宽镜头。

Oppo A74 5G在正确的地方有所改进,但在其他方面做出了让步。

另一方面,制造商取消了对microSD插槽的exFAT支持,并采用了较慢的快速充电技术(18瓦)。然而,Oppo以一个吸引人的价格管理了一个好的中档智能手机。在这一领域的强大替代品是 Galaxy A32 5GRedmi Note 10 5G这两款手机也都配备了LC显示屏。

价格和可用性

OPPO A74 5G已经开始销售,价格远低于建议零售价,可以在Amazon上找到。,CyberportOtto.

Oppo A74 5G - 08/18/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
89%
Battery
93%
Display
90%
Games Performance
31 / 64 → 48%
Application Performance
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
60%
Average
77%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 193348 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18063 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oppo A74 5G评测--经济实惠的5G智能手机,续航时间长
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-08-23 (Update: 2021-08-23)